Easy question....how many USB ports are on some of the newer motherboards?
Six on the back....plus more on headers?

What about SATA ports, have they gone much beyond four?

-John O

Re: # of USB ports by Paul

Paul
Fri May 09 08:40:24 PDT 2008

JohnO wrote:
> Easy question....how many USB ports are on some of the newer motherboards?
> Six on the back....plus more on headers?
>
> What about SATA ports, have they gone much beyond four?
>
> -John O
>

You can use the "advanced search" on the Newegg motherboard page to
get this information.

Intel motherboards:

For SATA, 4+4 or 6+2 might be max (Southbridge plus a separate
controller). Intel Southbridges have six SATA. For USB, I see one
with 8 ports on the back.

AMD motherboards:

For AMD motherboards, 6 USB on the back looks like the limit.
And perhaps 6 SATA.

HTH,
Paul


Re: # of USB ports by JohnO

JohnO
Fri May 09 10:06:43 PDT 2008


"Paul" <nospam@needed.com> wrote in message news:g01r6n$3ja$1@aioe.org...
> JohnO wrote:
>> Easy question....how many USB ports are on some of the newer
>> motherboards? Six on the back....plus more on headers?
>>
>> What about SATA ports, have they gone much beyond four?
>>
>> -John O
>
> You can use the "advanced search" on the Newegg motherboard page to
> get this information.

Aha, a new resource. Thanks!



Re: # of USB ports by OldDuke

OldDuke
Sat May 10 17:59:12 PDT 2008

On Fri, 9 May 2008 10:35:13 -0400, "JohnO"
<johno@!NOOSPAM!heathkit.com> wrote:

>Easy question....how many USB ports are on some of the newer motherboards?
>Six on the back....plus more on headers?
>
>What about SATA ports, have they gone much beyond four?
>
>-John O
>
This question has NOTHING to do with XP and is out of place HERE.

Ask elsewhere


Re: # of USB ports by JohnO

JohnO
Sun May 11 08:25:04 PDT 2008


"OldDuke" <none@nobody.net> wrote in message
news:b6hc24hbtjdpoaiuh43de930g20nj2bq5i@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 9 May 2008 10:35:13 -0400, "JohnO"
> <johno@!NOOSPAM!heathkit.com> wrote:
>
>>Easy question....how many USB ports are on some of the newer motherboards?
>>Six on the back....plus more on headers?
>>
>>What about SATA ports, have they gone much beyond four?
>>
>>-John O
>>
> This question has NOTHING to do with XP and is out of place HERE.
>
> Ask elsewhere
>

How many USB ports does Win XP/Vista support? Not devices (127) but ports.
And, can I add 127 devices to each port within Win XP?

-John O



Re: # of USB ports by Big

Big
Sun May 11 08:36:40 PDT 2008

JohnO wrote:
> "OldDuke" <none@nobody.net> wrote in message
> news:b6hc24hbtjdpoaiuh43de930g20nj2bq5i@4ax.com...
>> On Fri, 9 May 2008 10:35:13 -0400, "JohnO"
>> <johno@!NOOSPAM!heathkit.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Easy question....how many USB ports are on some of the newer motherboards?
>>> Six on the back....plus more on headers?
>>>
>>> What about SATA ports, have they gone much beyond four?
>>>
>>> -John O
>>>
>> This question has NOTHING to do with XP and is out of place HERE.
>>
>> Ask elsewhere
>>
>
> How many USB ports does Win XP/Vista support? Not devices (127) but ports.
> And, can I add 127 devices to each port within Win XP?
>
> -John O
>
>
You need 127*X ports?
My god man, what are you running? A factory?

Re: # of USB ports by JohnO

JohnO
Sun May 11 16:58:51 PDT 2008


"Big Al" <BigAl@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:coEVj.3530$5b3.2658@trnddc05...
> JohnO wrote:
>> "OldDuke" <none@nobody.net> wrote in message
>> news:b6hc24hbtjdpoaiuh43de930g20nj2bq5i@4ax.com...
>>> On Fri, 9 May 2008 10:35:13 -0400, "JohnO"
>>> <johno@!NOOSPAM!heathkit.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Easy question....how many USB ports are on some of the newer
>>>> motherboards?
>>>> Six on the back....plus more on headers?
>>>>
>>>> What about SATA ports, have they gone much beyond four?
>>>>
>>>> -John O
>>>>
>>> This question has NOTHING to do with XP and is out of place HERE.
>>>
>>> Ask elsewhere
>>>
>>
>> How many USB ports does Win XP/Vista support? Not devices (127) but
>> ports. And, can I add 127 devices to each port within Win XP?
>>
>> -John O
> You need 127*X ports?
> My god man, what are you running? A factory?

LOL, no. It's just a point of interest. It all gets back to the 'hub' and
'root hub' stuff that I can't wrap my brain around.

-John O



Re: # of USB ports by M

M
Mon May 12 01:10:30 PDT 2008


"OldDuke" <none@nobody.net> wrote in message
news:b6hc24hbtjdpoaiuh43de930g20nj2bq5i@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 9 May 2008 10:35:13 -0400, "JohnO"
> <johno@!NOOSPAM!heathkit.com> wrote:
>
>>Easy question....how many USB ports are on some of the newer motherboards?
>>Six on the back....plus more on headers?
>>
>>What about SATA ports, have they gone much beyond four?
>>
>>-John O
>>
> This question has NOTHING to do with XP and is out of place HERE.
>
> Ask elsewhere
>

OldDuke is our resident mentally retarded fuckwit.

Ignore him - everyone else does.



Re: # of USB ports by M

M
Mon May 12 01:13:56 PDT 2008


"JohnO" <johno@!NOOSPAM!heathkit.com> wrote in message
news:%23r%23tft3sIHA.3780@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>
> "OldDuke" <none@nobody.net> wrote in message
> news:b6hc24hbtjdpoaiuh43de930g20nj2bq5i@4ax.com...
>> On Fri, 9 May 2008 10:35:13 -0400, "JohnO"
>> <johno@!NOOSPAM!heathkit.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Easy question....how many USB ports are on some of the newer
>>>motherboards?
>>>Six on the back....plus more on headers?
>>>
>>>What about SATA ports, have they gone much beyond four?
>>>
>>>-John O
>>>
>> This question has NOTHING to do with XP and is out of place HERE.
>>
>> Ask elsewhere
>>
>
> How many USB ports does Win XP/Vista support? Not devices (127) but ports.
> And, can I add 127 devices to each port within Win XP?
>
>
I assume your question is theoretical.

USB supports up to 127 peripheral devices which can be connected with USB
hubs to expand the number of connectors. The hubs can be connected more or
less in any configuration that you please, but the hub tree must be
dendritic* and there can be no more than 15 hubs between the host and any
peripheral.

*The A and B connector configuration forces this topology.



Re: # of USB ports by JohnO

JohnO
Wed May 14 08:08:34 PDT 2008

>> How many USB ports does Win XP/Vista support? Not devices (127) but
>> ports. And, can I add 127 devices to each port within Win XP?
>>
>>
> I assume your question is theoretical.
>
> USB supports up to 127 peripheral devices which can be connected with USB
> hubs to expand the number of connectors. The hubs can be connected more
> or less in any configuration that you please, but the hub tree must be
> dendritic* and there can be no more than 15 hubs between the host and any
> peripheral.
>
> *The A and B connector configuration forces this topology.
>

Thanks, I found some collaborating info at usbmadesimple.co.uk.

Can I do the 127-thing on *each* of my two physical laptop USB ports, and
each of the six ports on the rear of my desktop mobo? Or, is there just one
root hub in there being split into several physical ports by an internal
hub...using up one of my allowed hubs in the dendritic chain? This kind of
thing is hard to google.

And yes, the question is academic, but only partially. I'm writing a
tutorial and hands-on lab, the end-user will connect a few devices and we'll
use Microsoft's UVCView USB utility to examine the ports and devices and the
power they're claiming. The theory says "127", but the practical application
is fuzzy and I don't see anyone explaining it.

(reminds me of the commonly quoted file name size limit: 254/255...everyone
quoted the MS-provided number, but nobody bothered to try it. I did, and the
results were different than what MS implied. Today most of us know that
"C:\" and takes away three of that 254...)

-John O




Re: # of USB ports by JohnO

JohnO
Wed May 14 09:09:10 PDT 2008


"JohnO" <johno@!NOOSPAM!heathkit.com> wrote in message
news:uiGhRSdtIHA.672@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>>> How many USB ports does Win XP/Vista support? Not devices (127) but
>>> ports. And, can I add 127 devices to each port within Win XP?
>>>
>>>
>> I assume your question is theoretical.
>>
>> USB supports up to 127 peripheral devices which can be connected with USB
>> hubs to expand the number of connectors. The hubs can be connected more
>> or less in any configuration that you please, but the hub tree must be
>> dendritic* and there can be no more than 15 hubs between the host and any
>> peripheral.
>>
>> *The A and B connector configuration forces this topology.
>>
>
> Thanks, I found some collaborating info at usbmadesimple.co.uk.
>
> Can I do the 127-thing on *each* of my two physical laptop USB ports, and
> each of the six ports on the rear of my desktop mobo? Or, is there just
> one root hub in there being split into several physical ports by an
> internal hub...using up one of my allowed hubs in the dendritic chain?
> This kind of thing is hard to google.
>
> And yes, the question is academic, but only partially. I'm writing a
> tutorial and hands-on lab, the end-user will connect a few devices and
> we'll use Microsoft's UVCView USB utility to examine the ports and devices
> and the power they're claiming. The theory says "127", but the practical
> application is fuzzy and I don't see anyone explaining it.
>
> (reminds me of the commonly quoted file name size limit:
> 254/255...everyone quoted the MS-provided number, but nobody bothered to
> try it. I did, and the results were different than what MS implied. Today
> most of us know that "C:\" and takes away three of that 254...)
>
> -John O
>

<answering my own question...>

Per wiki: "USB host may have multiple host controllers and each host
controller may provide one or more USB ports. Up to 127 devices, including
the hub devices, may be connected to a single host controller."

So, my Intel mobo could handle 889 devices.

<wondering how to get the purchase order approved to test this>

-John O



Re: # of USB ports by Bob

Bob
Wed May 14 09:19:00 PDT 2008



JohnO wrote:

> "JohnO" <johno@!NOOSPAM!heathkit.com> wrote in message
> news:uiGhRSdtIHA.672@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>
>>>>How many USB ports does Win XP/Vista support? Not devices (127) but
>>>>ports. And, can I add 127 devices to each port within Win XP?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>I assume your question is theoretical.
>>>
>>>USB supports up to 127 peripheral devices which can be connected with USB
>>>hubs to expand the number of connectors. The hubs can be connected more
>>>or less in any configuration that you please, but the hub tree must be
>>>dendritic* and there can be no more than 15 hubs between the host and any
>>>peripheral.
>>>
>>>*The A and B connector configuration forces this topology.
>>>
>>
>>Thanks, I found some collaborating info at usbmadesimple.co.uk.
>>
>>Can I do the 127-thing on *each* of my two physical laptop USB ports, and
>>each of the six ports on the rear of my desktop mobo? Or, is there just
>>one root hub in there being split into several physical ports by an
>>internal hub...using up one of my allowed hubs in the dendritic chain?
>>This kind of thing is hard to google.
>>
>>And yes, the question is academic, but only partially. I'm writing a
>>tutorial and hands-on lab, the end-user will connect a few devices and
>>we'll use Microsoft's UVCView USB utility to examine the ports and devices
>>and the power they're claiming. The theory says "127", but the practical
>>application is fuzzy and I don't see anyone explaining it.
>>
>>(reminds me of the commonly quoted file name size limit:
>>254/255...everyone quoted the MS-provided number, but nobody bothered to
>>try it. I did, and the results were different than what MS implied. Today
>>most of us know that "C:\" and takes away three of that 254...)
>>
>>-John O
>>
>
>
> <answering my own question...>
>
> Per wiki: "USB host may have multiple host controllers and each host
> controller may provide one or more USB ports. Up to 127 devices, including
> the hub devices, may be connected to a single host controller."
>
> So, my Intel mobo could handle 889 devices.
>
> <wondering how to get the purchase order approved to test this>
>
> -John O
>

I think you will be having "severe propagation and timing issues" a long
time before you get to 127 devices. Much less stacking the wiring and
hubs to accomodate nearly 900 USB items. ;-)


Re: # of USB ports by JohnO

JohnO
Wed May 14 11:32:26 PDT 2008


"Bob I" <birelan@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:eDaU54dtIHA.524@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>
>
> JohnO wrote:
>
>> "JohnO" <johno@!NOOSPAM!heathkit.com> wrote in message
>> news:uiGhRSdtIHA.672@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>>
>>>>>How many USB ports does Win XP/Vista support? Not devices (127) but
>>>>>ports. And, can I add 127 devices to each port within Win XP?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>I assume your question is theoretical.
>>>>
>>>>USB supports up to 127 peripheral devices which can be connected with
>>>>USB hubs to expand the number of connectors. The hubs can be connected
>>>>more or less in any configuration that you please, but the hub tree must
>>>>be dendritic* and there can be no more than 15 hubs between the host and
>>>>any peripheral.
>>>>
>>>>*The A and B connector configuration forces this topology.
>>>>
>>>
>>>Thanks, I found some collaborating info at usbmadesimple.co.uk.
>>>
>>>Can I do the 127-thing on *each* of my two physical laptop USB ports, and
>>>each of the six ports on the rear of my desktop mobo? Or, is there just
>>>one root hub in there being split into several physical ports by an
>>>internal hub...using up one of my allowed hubs in the dendritic chain?
>>>This kind of thing is hard to google.
>>>
>>>And yes, the question is academic, but only partially. I'm writing a
>>>tutorial and hands-on lab, the end-user will connect a few devices and
>>>we'll use Microsoft's UVCView USB utility to examine the ports and
>>>devices and the power they're claiming. The theory says "127", but the
>>>practical application is fuzzy and I don't see anyone explaining it.
>>>
>>>(reminds me of the commonly quoted file name size limit:
>>>254/255...everyone quoted the MS-provided number, but nobody bothered to
>>>try it. I did, and the results were different than what MS implied. Today
>>>most of us know that "C:\" and takes away three of that 254...)
>>>
>>>-John O
>>>
>>
>>
>> <answering my own question...>
>>
>> Per wiki: "USB host may have multiple host controllers and each host
>> controller may provide one or more USB ports. Up to 127 devices,
>> including the hub devices, may be connected to a single host controller."
>>
>> So, my Intel mobo could handle 889 devices.
>>
>> <wondering how to get the purchase order approved to test this>
>>
>> -John O
>
> I think you will be having "severe propagation and timing issues" a long
> time before you get to 127 devices. Much less stacking the wiring and hubs
> to accomodate nearly 900 USB items. ;-)
>

You're not helping the cause, Bob, even though you're certainly right. :-)
I remember reading about someone building a 127-device system back when USB
was new, it was mostly keyboards and mice and hubs, and a stunt at a Comdex
or something.

-John O




Re: # of USB ports by Bob

Bob
Wed May 14 12:30:19 PDT 2008



JohnO wrote:
> "Bob I" <birelan@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:eDaU54dtIHA.524@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>
>>
>>JohnO wrote:
>>
>>
>>>"JohnO" <johno@!NOOSPAM!heathkit.com> wrote in message
>>>news:uiGhRSdtIHA.672@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>>>
>>>
>>>>>>How many USB ports does Win XP/Vista support? Not devices (127) but
>>>>>>ports. And, can I add 127 devices to each port within Win XP?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>I assume your question is theoretical.
>>>>>
>>>>>USB supports up to 127 peripheral devices which can be connected with
>>>>>USB hubs to expand the number of connectors. The hubs can be connected
>>>>>more or less in any configuration that you please, but the hub tree must
>>>>>be dendritic* and there can be no more than 15 hubs between the host and
>>>>>any peripheral.
>>>>>
>>>>>*The A and B connector configuration forces this topology.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Thanks, I found some collaborating info at usbmadesimple.co.uk.
>>>>
>>>>Can I do the 127-thing on *each* of my two physical laptop USB ports, and
>>>>each of the six ports on the rear of my desktop mobo? Or, is there just
>>>>one root hub in there being split into several physical ports by an
>>>>internal hub...using up one of my allowed hubs in the dendritic chain?
>>>>This kind of thing is hard to google.
>>>>
>>>>And yes, the question is academic, but only partially. I'm writing a
>>>>tutorial and hands-on lab, the end-user will connect a few devices and
>>>>we'll use Microsoft's UVCView USB utility to examine the ports and
>>>>devices and the power they're claiming. The theory says "127", but the
>>>>practical application is fuzzy and I don't see anyone explaining it.
>>>>
>>>>(reminds me of the commonly quoted file name size limit:
>>>>254/255...everyone quoted the MS-provided number, but nobody bothered to
>>>>try it. I did, and the results were different than what MS implied. Today
>>>>most of us know that "C:\" and takes away three of that 254...)
>>>>
>>>>-John O
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>><answering my own question...>
>>>
>>>Per wiki: "USB host may have multiple host controllers and each host
>>>controller may provide one or more USB ports. Up to 127 devices,
>>>including the hub devices, may be connected to a single host controller."
>>>
>>>So, my Intel mobo could handle 889 devices.
>>>
>>><wondering how to get the purchase order approved to test this>
>>>
>>>-John O
>>
>>I think you will be having "severe propagation and timing issues" a long
>>time before you get to 127 devices. Much less stacking the wiring and hubs
>>to accomodate nearly 900 USB items. ;-)
>>
>
>
> You're not helping the cause, Bob, even though you're certainly right. :-)
> I remember reading about someone building a 127-device system back when USB
> was new, it was mostly keyboards and mice and hubs, and a stunt at a Comdex
> or something.
>
> -John O
>
>
Quick hunt on google yielded 111 devices at Comdex in 1998

http://www.zisman.ca/Articles/1999/USB.html