John
Sun Apr 20 04:40:32 PDT 2008
As you suspect they have been incorporated within SP3 and, as such, have
been installed for you. While I know any users install the public betas I
certainly wouldn't be installing it on a machine that is used for anything
other than testing beta software. Luckily I haven't had any problems with XP
SP3 beta, but many testers have, and the last thing anyone wants is a main
machine that keeps crashing.
--
--
John Barnett MVP
Associate Expert
Windows Desktop Experience
Web:
http://xphelpandsupport.mvps.org
Web:
http://vistasupport.mvps.org
The information in this mail/post is supplied "as is". No warranty of any
kind, either expressed or implied, is made in relation to the accuracy,
reliability or content of this mail/post. The Author shall not be liable for
any direct, indirect, incidental or consequential damages arising out of the
use of, or inability to use, information or opinions expressed in this
mail/post..
"occam" <occam@razor.dot.com> wrote in message
news:u1oFgMtoIHA.5836@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>I recently installed SP3 (well, ok, the RC2 'Refresh' version)
>
> Today when I checked Windows Update ('custom' option), I discovered to my
> horror that the 10 'optional' updates normally parked there which I shun
> (including .NET 3.0, .Net 3.5, etc) were no longer being offered.
>
> Is this because they are now installed with SP3, or no longer necessary?
>
> Me Worried? Yes.
>
> Anyone else notice this?