Check Box Form Field Value in If Then Else Calculation

Tutorials Win: Microsoft Windows Forum

- Previous
  - 1
    - PageNum and NumPages I am building complex documents that need Page X of Y in the footer, and this is happening all in VBA. I am combining documents in code, and cannot have the pagenum and numpages fields linked when the document is completed, because it is combined with other documents. So I will get a final document and need to write my own page numbers in the footer. Every page will be in its own section and linktoprevious will always be false. I do not see a Pages collection to loop through. Does anybody have a sample of how I might do this? Use bookmarks perhaps? I just want to loop from page to page and fill in the bookmark with Page X of Y. Please help! Derek Tag: Check Box Form Field Value in If Then Else Calculation Tag: 101900
  - 2
    - Need Macro to Lock all Links I need a macro which will lock all links in the document on screen. For Word 2003. There are two ways we can do this manually: 1. Select the entire document and press Ctrl+F11 2. Edit-Links-(Select all links in document), click Locked under "update method for selected link") But I need a macro to do this since the users who need to take these actions may find the process confusing. I haven't been able to record a macro to do this. Can anyone provide me with the code to do this? Tag: Check Box Form Field Value in If Then Else Calculation Tag: 101897
  - 3
    - =?Utf-8?Q?Mscomm_PortOpen_error_=E2=80=93_does_any?= Hi Everybody: Iâ??ve run across this error on several computers and much has been written about it on the web but no one seems to understand what causes it or how to fix it. The problem became evident when I was trying to use the â??Dialerâ?? sample code in Visual Basic. ALL the ports came back with a â??Run-time error 8012 device not openâ?? even when the statement before it is: â??MSComm1.PortOpen=Trueâ?? and of course the state before it is â??MScomm1.ComPort = 3â?? the port number to my modem. Similar problems exist on the HyperTerminal. The HyperTerminal wonâ??t work on COM 3 my modem port number, it will work on GTW V.92 Voicemodem the name associated with the modem, and of course non of the other port numbers wonâ??t work either. Iâ??ve tried changing the port number of my modem and in the Visual Basic sample program, but the problems remained the same. Does anyone really know how to fix this problem? Thanks Kurt Tag: Check Box Form Field Value in If Then Else Calculation Tag: 101893
  - 4
    - Include several nonbreaking spaces in an expression Dear Experts: I came up with the following macro to insert a nonbreaking space between the =A7-symbol followed by any number of blank spaces (usually one or two) and any following number. For example: =A7nonbreakingspace138 (=A7 138). It is running fine. See the code below. Sub InsertNonBreakingSpace() Dim rngStory As Range For Each rngStory In ActiveDocument.StoryRanges With rngStory.Find .Text =3D "(=A7) {1;}([0-9])" .MatchWildcards =3D True .Execute Replace:=3DwdReplaceAll, ReplaceWith:=3D"\1^s\2" End With Next rngStory End Sub But now I would like to expand the macro to insert a nonbreaking space not only after the =A7-symbol but also after the number (can be a number with one, two, three, four etc. digits) that immediatley follows the first nonbreaking space as in: =A7-NonbreakingSpace-138-NonbreakingSpace-Corporate Code (=A7 138 Corporate Code) I did not manage to re-write my code to include the second nonbreaking space. Help is appreciated. Thank you very much in advance. Tag: Check Box Form Field Value in If Then Else Calculation Tag: 101891
  - 5
    - Identify Active Formfield Item Number? I am creating a locked Word 2003 document containing a number of (un-bookmarked) Text Form Fields. Owing to a problem with the limited availability of number formats for the Text Form Field (see previous Discussion Group question), I need to run a Macro on exiting the field to reformat the Result. The Macro will something like the following: Sub FieldFormatter() With ActiveDocument Dim X as Integer ' Item number of the Text Form Field that ran the Macro X = ?????????????????????????????????? ' WHAT? HELP! .FormFields(X).Result = Format(.FormFields(X).Result, "Â£#,##0") End With End Sub Can anyone please advise me as to how I can identify the Item number for the FormField (Text Form Field) that called the Macro? All contributions will be gladly accepted! Paul J Tag: Check Box Form Field Value in If Then Else Calculation Tag: 101888
  - 6
    - Macro help (open doc from template - then close template) Hi all, Can anyone help please. I have the following macro which runs based on a selection of 'Y' or 'N' in an excel spreadsheet which opens a word doc from a word template. My question is how can this be modified to open the word doc based on the template, but close the actual template once the new doc is openend. Currently when you save the new document, it also asks if you wish to save ythe template(basically overwrite), which leave the document template open to be overtyped!! Sub GetWordDocument() Dim oWordApp As Object Dim oDoc As Object Dim sFilename As String Set oWordApp = CreateObject("Word.Application") If Range("G3").Value = "Y" Then sFilename = "M:\001_Quality\Manual advice Notes\Template\ST011AFO Issue 1 Advice note AND Customs invoice.dot" Else sFilename = "M:\001_Quality\Manual advice Notes\Template\ST011FO Issue 4 Manual Advice Note.dot" End If Set oDoc = oWordApp.Documents.Add(sFilename) oWordApp.Visible = True Set oDoc = Nothing Set oWordApp = Nothing End Sub Private Sub CommandButton1_Click() End Sub THANKS ALL Tag: Check Box Form Field Value in If Then Else Calculation Tag: 101887
  - 7
    - this key is already associated with an element of this collection A macro I'm creating (see partial code below) reads tab-delimited fields from a text file. The strange thing is that after I shut it down then start it up again for testing, I receive the message "This key is already associated with an element of this collection"--almost as if the process is kept in memory from the previous session. The hangup occurs on the line that reads "arrHeaderNames(intCtr)" at the end. Then, even more strange, when I bump the yellow highlighted step indicator back up about three lines to "Line Input #1," it runs OK. Thanks in advance for any thoughts. 'get some key values from source file and assign them to main variables Open strPathWkFile For Input As #1 Line Input #1, strScrap arrHeaderNames = Split(strScrap, Chr(9)) For intCtr = LBound(arrHeaderNames) To UBound(arrHeaderNames) colHeader.Add Item:=Trim(str(intCtr)), Key:=arrHeaderNames(intCtr) Next intCtr intCtr = 0 Do While Not EOF(1) intCtr = intCtr + 1 Line Input #1, strScrap arrFieldData = Split(strScrap, Chr(9)) strLead_ID = arrFieldData(Val(colHeader.Item("Lead_ID"))) I even tried changing the value of intCtr in the troubled line from 0 to 1 but to no avail. -- Bryan Tag: Check Box Form Field Value in If Then Else Calculation Tag: 101885
  - 8
    - Word templates on new server are inaccessible when old server is o A group of Word templates was created on SERVER1 some years ago. The original server location is reflected in the file location field code in the footer as \\SERVER1\[template location]. A couple of years ago, the templates were MOVED to \\SERVER2\[template location] where users have been accessing them without a problem using Word 2003. There is no copy of the templates on SERVER1. After decommissioning SERVER1, it was turned off. Afterwards, users reported that Word would hang when they tried to create new documents from the templates. This was remedied by turning SERVER1 back on again. QUESTIONS: How could access to the templates be impeded by turning off SERVER1 when the templates no longer reside there? Is there somehow a hidden pointer to SERVER1 within the template code that redirects back to SERVER2? The following obvious causes have been ruled out: 1. Both file locations for Word templates (user and workgroup) are pointing to SERVER2. 2. Checking the VBA editor within Word, there is no hard-coding in any of the templates (including normal.dot) that points to SERVER1. 3. There are no startup macros or templates in ..\Office11\Startup. Users DO share a network normal.dot. Autotext entries in this template are updated by a single person, the same person who created the templates on SERVER1. A search of the VBA code for normal.dot does not reveal any pointers to SERVER1. The goal is to decommission SERVER1 without impeding access to the templates on SERVER2. Any assistance in this regard would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Clark Tag: Check Box Form Field Value in If Then Else Calculation Tag: 101878
  - 9
    - VBA file/save I have a .dot that I'd like nun a macro to rename <file name>.dot to <file name_><textbox41>.doc & set the directory to H:\my Documents and have it appear in the und user's file/save dialog box. I'm a novice, so please be verbose. Thanks John Tag: Check Box Form Field Value in If Then Else Calculation Tag: 101873
  - 10
    - Text Form Field - Number Format Problem I am creating a (Word 2003) protected form using Text Form Fields to accept input (and to perform a calculation on previously input Number fields). The Number Format dropdown box in the Text Form Field Options menu where the Type is Number, offers only a limited set of number of available formats. One of these formats, Â£#,##0.00;(Â£#,##0.00), can be edited to Â£#,##0;(Â£#,##0) to allow input of values of whole Pounds (Sterling) only. HOWEVER, I am not happy with the format of the negative values (i.e. in parentheses) and I would REALLY prefer to use "Â£,0;-Â£,0". I am able to use my prefered number format to display the result in the Calculation type of Text Form Field - but I have been unable to see how I can apply this format to a(n input) Number type Text Form Field. Can anybody help, please? PJ Tag: Check Box Form Field Value in If Then Else Calculation Tag: 101866
  - 11
    - Set Active Printer using automation in word for C# How to set the active printer in late binding for word.application using C#? Try the following, cannot work: Parameters = new Object[2]; Parameters[0] = printername; Parameters[1] = 1; String[] argNames = new String[] { "Printer", "DoNotSetAsSysDefault" }; wordApplication.GetType().InvokeMember("FilePrintSetup", BindingFlags.InvokeMethod, null, wordApplication, Parameters, null, null, argNames); Thanks. Tag: Check Box Form Field Value in If Then Else Calculation Tag: 101864
  - 12
    - Need troubleshooting help with 3 lines of VBA code This crashes Word 2007 even though it works with previous versions. Current doc is just standing for the name of the currently active document. Sub FollowLink() Selection.Hyperlinks(1).Follow Documents("current.doc").Close End Sub Any one got any idea why? Tag: Check Box Form Field Value in If Then Else Calculation Tag: 101858
  - 13
    - AutoClose and file path in footer Hi I would like to create a AutoClose macro that enters the file path in the footer of page 1. Any ideas? Tag: Check Box Form Field Value in If Then Else Calculation Tag: 101855
  - 14
    - Mail merge and AutoNew Hi I have a template that merges data from an Excel document and I need to create a AutoNew macro in it. I have created the AutoNew macro and it works fine if I open up the document and run it through Visual Basic. If I open up the template to create a new document it asks me to accept the SQL command that gets the information from Excel and then it seems like it forgets to run the AutoNew macro. Have anyone seen this problem before and is there a way around it? Tag: Check Box Form Field Value in If Then Else Calculation Tag: 101847
  - 15
    - Save Document oddity I have used macros similar to the following to insert (in this instance) the path at the foot of a document. However testing this in Word 2007 has thrown up an anomaly in that the check for whether the document is saved is completely ignored inevitably causing an error at the line pPathname= if the document has not already been saved. This always worked in Word 2003, however on testing again in Word 2003 (my PC currently has both Word 2003 and 2007 installed in parallel) it no longer worked there either. Following a reboot, it worked again in 2003, but not in 2007, and then on closing 2007 and reopening 2003 it no longer works there. Reboot and open 2007 without first opening 2003 and it still doesn't work :( Initially I thought that the presence of both versions was the problem, but my laptop only has 2007 and it doesn't work there either. Any ideas? I am trying to like 2007 ..... honest .... but it seems to throw up one problem after another. On an entirely different note my laptop's Word 2007 has an AddIns tab on the Ribbon, that of my desktop doesn't. My desktop has Acrobat 8.1 instead. I guess that may be getting in the way, in the inimitable manner Adobe has of screwing with Word :( ? Sub InsrtPath() Dim pPathname As String Dim pFoldername As String With ActiveDocument If Not .Saved Then .Save End If pPathname = Left$(.FullName, (Len(.FullName) - Len(.Name) - 1)) pFoldername = Right$(pPathname, (Len(pPathname) - InStrRev(pPathname, "\"))) End With Selection.TypeText pPathname End Sub -- <>>< ><<> ><<> <>>< ><<> <>>< <>><<> Graham Mayor - Word MVP My web site www.gmayor.com Word MVP web site http://word.mvps.org <>>< ><<> ><<> <>>< ><<> <>>< <>><<> Tag: Check Box Form Field Value in If Then Else Calculation Tag: 101839
  - 16
    - Reading a .txt file Hey guys, I have a ms word document that contains a table. I'm looking for a script that will read variables from a .txt file (output from another program) and insert them into my word document (report) I cannot seem to find anything on the web. Thanks Tag: Check Box Form Field Value in If Then Else Calculation Tag: 101830
  - 17
    - mscomm not opening Hi Everybody: I've been trying to get the Dialer software example that came with VB to work. I changed the port number to match my modem port number and I keep getting the "The device not open " error message after the "MSComm1.PortOpen = True" is executed. There is no sound that generally heard when a modem port is opened. Does anyone have a suggestion? Thanks KAB Tag: Check Box Form Field Value in If Then Else Calculation Tag: 101827
  - 18
    - Word 2003 ActiveDocument.Name Hi group I have a macro that uses the ActiveDocument.Name property, but it seems that when I create a new document based on the template that holds this macro, the new document is not always the active document. I would assume that when you create a new document, this would automatically be set as the active document, but I can see it happens many times, that the new document it placed behind one or more documents currently opened in Word, and one of these is the active document instead of the newly created one. How can I force the newly created document always to be the active document? Best regards Hans-Henrik Tag: Check Box Form Field Value in If Then Else Calculation Tag: 101825
  - 19
    - Inserting a field that users cannot edit I am using custom doc properties to store some values and update several fields in a word document after a particular event. I do not want users to be able to overwrite any of the fields by typing. I believe that this can be accomplished by selecting the field and pressing ctrl+shift+F11, but how can I accomplish this programatically? (These are fields as in ActiveDocument.Fields) Thanks! Tag: Check Box Form Field Value in If Then Else Calculation Tag: 101820
  - 20
    - Tidy up Checking text before inclusion in my club bulletin, I use a 'Tidy up' macro to get rid of white space, make sure there is a space after a period and comma and not before, etc, etc. With MVP help it also makes sure there is not a space after a full stop and comma in a figure, as in £1,000.00 The only remaining problem is to make sure there are not spaces in URLs. Any suggestions? Francis Hookham Tag: Check Box Form Field Value in If Then Else Calculation Tag: 101819
  - 21
    - What's changed in vba in Word 2007? Hi folks, According to a friend, this macro works fine in Word 2003 but causes a crash in Word 2007. The name boat-03 is the name of the current active document. Sub FollowLink() Selection.Hyperlinks(1).Follow Documents("boat-03.doc").Close End Sub I personally don't have Word 2007 to test it myself. Can anyone shed any light on this? Tag: Check Box Form Field Value in If Then Else Calculation Tag: 101815
  - 22
    - Styles help I was working with Russ on this but I had a family emergency and gone for 5 days. I have the following macro but canâ??t get it to work right. When I run the macro for example it converts "^dLISTNUM 24 \l 2" to the word "Heading 2". It doesn't see that as an Outline Number style and make it â??1.2â??. Dim SearchRange As Range Set SearchRange = ActiveDocument.Range SearchRange.TextRetrievalMode.IncludeFieldCodes = True With SearchRange.Find .Forward = True .Wrap = wdFindStop .ClearFormatting .Format = True .Text = "^dLISTNUM ^#^# \l ^#" .Replacement.Text = "" While .Execute SearchRange.Text = "Heading " & SearchRange.Characters.Last.Previous SearchRange.Select Selection.Style = ActiveDocument.Styles("Heading " & _ SearchRange.Characters.Last) SearchRange.SetRange Start:=SearchRange.End, _ End:=ActiveDocument.Range.End Wend End With LEU Tag: Check Box Form Field Value in If Then Else Calculation Tag: 101790
  - 23
    - MI5 Persecution: Stasi 21/4/96 (16220) Subject: Chief Constable Alderson Condemns "Stasi" MI5 Newsgroups:uk.misc,uk.politics,uk.media,uk.legal,soc.culture.british Organization: Toronto Free-Net Summary: Keywords: John Alderson, former Chief Constable of Devon and Cornwall, had the following to say about the expansion of the Security Service's powers, in a recent magazine article; "It is fatal to let the secret service into the area of ordinary crime. MI5 is not under the same restraints as the police. They infiltrate organisations, people's jobs and lives. They operate almost like a cancer." "At the moment the acorn of a Stasi [the former East German communists' secret service] has been planted. It is there for future governments to build on." The message is clear. Criminal subversion and criminal harassment by an unpoliced minority not subject to the law, "infiltration of people's jobs and lives" is with us today. 16220 Tag: Check Box Form Field Value in If Then Else Calculation Tag: 101788
  - 24
    - MI5 Persecution: Leant On 7/4/96 (14706) From: Green <Green@guidion.demon.co.uk> Newsgroups: uk.misc,uk.politics,alt.politics.british,soc.culture.british Subject: Re: MI5 Persecution: Why Aren't the British Police Doing Their Job? Reply-To: Green@guidion.demon.co.uk Date: Sun Apr 7 21:13:30 1996 In article <DpIE0r.736.0.bloor@torfree.net> bu765@torfree.net "Mike Corley" writes: > Last Easter (1995) I went into the local police station in London and spoke to > an officer about the harassment against me. But I couldn't provide tangible > evidence; what people said, in many cases years ago, is beyond proof, and > without something to support my statements I cannot expect a police officer to > take the complaint seriously. This in itself dos not suggest that the police have it in for you. The old bill operates on extremely tight spending limits forced on them by that pillock Michael Howard, and without evidence, they often have higher priorities than chasing something that cannot go to court. I doubt that the police are actually being leant on, but they probably realise that if they looked into this, they would be leant on hard. The met always stays away from anything that looks like it has Defence, Security or secret service interest already, because they realise that they are below these government agencies in the general pecking order. This attitude was made clear in a TV show where a left wing comedian heckled some aristocratic Tory candidate in a local election. The police officer gave the comic a ticking off, even though you could see that this young copper sympathised with the comedian, and regarded the Tory as an upper-crust wanker. He said, and I quote "I'm giving you the ticking off and not him because he's a Lord and I'm a Police Constable." If I walked into my local nick and complained that MI5 were snooping on me, they would show me the door without even looking at my evidence, because that bored desk seargant with only five years to go before he retires doesn't want to start fucking about with somebody who has incurred the wrath of Stella Rimington. He would rather deal with the lost dogs and driving licence producers, eat his cheese and pickle sandwiches and piss off home at the end of his shift than have some high ranking spook having a go at his boss and getting him a bollocking. In short, you have earned much sympathy but little surprise. Just remember that saying about the enemy of your enemies. Have a nice day. ******************************************* QUOTE OF THE DAY****************** * You have just read the opinons of : * "Common sense is merely the set * * * of prejudices a person acquires* ========================================================================= Subject: Re: MI5 Persecution: Why Aren't the British Police Doing Their Job? Newsgroups: uk.misc,uk.politics,alt.politics.british,soc.culture.british Followup-To: uk.misc,uk.politics,alt.politics.british,soc.culture.british References: <DpIE0r.736.0.bloor@torfree.net> Organization: Toronto Free-Net Distribution: >This in itself dos not suggest that the police have it in for you. >The old bill operates on extremely tight spending limits forced on >them by that pillock Michael Howard, and without evidence, they >often have higher priorities than chasing something that cannot go >to court. I think the police know well what's going on. It is up to them to do something about it. They know I've made a complaint at a police station. I could probably do more to try to help myself (I think someone suggested making a written complaint to the chief constable) but even then I nthink they would not take action. > >I doubt that the police are actually being leant on, but they probably >realise that if they looked into this, they would be leant on hard. >The met always stays away from anything that looks like it has Defence, >Security or secret service interest already, because they realise that >they are below these government agencies in the general pecking order. > So we have a situation where the security service breaks the law, everyone knows MI5 breaks the law, and the police won't investigate crimes that would otherwise earn a jail sentence. Oh good, I'm really glad the UK is a democracy. (<sarcasm>, for those of you who didn't catch that) >If I walked into my local nick and complained that MI5 were snooping on me, >they would show me the door without even looking at my evidence, because >that bored desk seargant with only five years to go before he retires >doesn't want to start fucking about with somebody who has incurred the >wrath of Stella Rimington. He would rather deal with the lost dogs and >driving licence producers, eat his cheese and pickle sandwiches and piss >off home at the end of his shift than have some high ranking spook having >a go at his boss and getting him a bollocking. In this case I think it is 'high-ranking' police officers who are aware of the persecution, they know a complaint has been made, and they're doing nothing. What is more, I don't think there is anything I can do that would make them take action, both because they may be being 'leant on' and through the wider view that it could be deleterious to the state to have a persecution by state organs exposed. They're wrong in taking that point of view, because sooner or later this will all out anyway, and they it will be n years of police inaction (n>=6) that will be questioned. > >In short, you have earned much sympathy but little surprise. Just remember >that saying about the enemy of your enemies. > >Have a nice day. 14706 Tag: Check Box Form Field Value in If Then Else Calculation Tag: 101787
  - 25
    - MI5 Persecution: Shoot to Kill 4/4/96 (13192) Newsgroups: uk.misc,uk.politics,alt.politics.british,soc.culture.british From: jbaker@pobox.com (Jill Baker) Subject: Re: MI5 Persecution: How and Why Did it Start? Reply-To: jbaker@pobox.com Date: Thu Apr 4 05:03:01 1996 jbaker@pobox.com (Jill Baker) wrote: >bu765@torfree.net (Mike Corley) wrote: >>Why would >>the security services expend hundreds of thousands of pounds and more than fiv >>years of manpower to try to kill a British citizen? Because ... >So why didn't they just shoot you dead? >It would have been a lot cheaper. Please make the effort to respond to this point Mike. It was a serious question. Jill (my opinions are entirely my own, no-one else's) ================================================================= Subject: Re: MI5 Persecution: How and Why Did it Start? Newsgroups: uk.misc,uk.politics,alt.politics.british,soc.culture.british Followup-To: uk.misc,uk.politics,alt.politics.british,soc.culture.british References: <Dp5IAr.1EB.0.bloor@torfree.net> Organization: Toronto Free-Net Distribution: jbaker@pobox.com (Jill Baker) wrote: >bu765@torfree.net (Mike Corley) wrote: >>Why would >>the security services expend hundreds of thousands of pounds and more than fiv >>years of manpower to try to kill a British citizen? Because ... >So why didn't they just shoot you dead? >It would have been a lot cheaper. I think there are two reasons nobody has taken physical action as opposed to verbal; a) A lot of people "know". Perhaps you the reader might not know, but lots of people in the media etc do. Remember, I was born in the UK and lived there until a couple of years ago. I don't think these people would condone state-sponsored murder of someone who might be seen on a good day as one of their own. b) Rather than doind anything directly, they're going for spying, verbal harassment, media harassment, every form of persecution short of the physical. Because as soon as anything turns physical, the police become involved; and unless it turns physical, the police can shrug and say 'not our problem'. So they persecute you and try to get you to react, either by hitting one of them (in which case I clearly find myself in the wrong as far as the police are concerned), or by trying to harm myself (in which case they can pretend they weren't responsible). It's a pretty unproductive form of harassment actually, because if you don't react then they're wasting they're time. Or perhaps they're just cheap bullies and trying to wreck someone's life, without any ulterior motive? 13192 Tag: Check Box Form Field Value in If Then Else Calculation Tag: 101786
- Next
  - 1
    - MI5 Persecution: Email Cruelty 11/3/96 (11678) From: D.S.Toube@qmw.ac.uk (David Toube) Newsgroups: uk.misc,uk.politics,uk.legal,uk.media,soc.culture.british Subject: Re: Why Censorship Must Not Be Allowed on Uk.* Reply-To: D.S.Toube@qmw.ac.uk Date: Mon Mar 11 11:47:13 1996 A OSHINEYE <TA5330@QMWCC7.qmw.ac.uk> wrote: :D.S.Toube@qmw.ac.uk (David Toube) wrote: :>I would also be very pleased if Mike Corley would not mailbomb me :>via my university account with messages entitled 'This Is What :>You Get For Censorship', thus closing down the entire college :>email system. :> :>Although it does not personally inconvenience me, it is rather :>dull for the college. :When did this happen? BTW you can always use Pegasus Mail to send all :email from Corley's address back to him and see how he likes it. :--Ade : This weekend. The result, Mike Corley will be gratified to hear, was that all users of the college system were prevented from using email. I suspect that there is no stopping Mike Corley. If mail is automatically returned to him, he will return it back to you tenfold. If he is thrown off his account, as he surely will be, he will find another one. I do not care whether Mike Corley has an email account or not. It is a matter of supreme indifference to me whether his fanciful account of persecution is aired or not. If he thinks that he has been persecuted by M15 and Chris Tarrant, then that is a matter for him. But there is a world of difference between repeatedly spamming usenet - which is unacceptable - and setting up a Web Site containing his post, which is entirely acceptable. Then it will be possible to choose whether or not to partake of his fantasy. However although I would not like to see the censorship of posts because they demonstrate evidence of mental illness, I suspect that Mike Corley will inevitably be censored by his ISP following a number of complaints of usenet abuse and mailbombing. ---- David Toube Lecturer in Law QMW, University of London WWW: http://www.qmw.ac.uk/~ugtl027/index.html David Boothroyd's British Elections Home Page WWW: http://www.qmw.ac.uk/~laws/election/home.html 11678 Tag: Check Box Form Field Value in If Then Else Calculation Tag: 101785
  - 2
    - MI5 Persecution: Jeff Rooker MP 5/3/96 (10164) From: rael@midnight.org (Rael A. Fenchurch) Newsgroups: uk.misc,uk.politics,uk.media,uk.legal,alt.politics.british Subject: Re: Persecution in the U.K. Date: Tue Mar 5 04:37:52 1996 Mike, >"go away" replies, and one from a Labour MP saying he was aware of my situation >but wouldn't help me because he regarded me as the "bad guy". Gee thanks, they >do this and then offload the shame they should feel onto you by telling you "oh >but it's your fault". It's a mad world. Do you happen to have a copy of this MPs letter? After all, a scanned copy of it would lend great weight to your case here. At the moment, you've offered us nothing in the way of evidence, which is one of the main reasons we all think you've truly gone fishing. So? Rael... ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- --- Rael A. Fenchurch (rael@midnight.org, http://www.midnight.org/rael/) --- --- "I don't think compassion's the language of our time" --- --- "Doubt or Die" --- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- ========================================================================== From: Andy Howard <andy@kiss100.demon.co.uk> Newsgroups: uk.misc,uk.politics,uk.media,uk.legal,alt.politics.british Subject: Re: Persecution in the U.K. Reply-To: andy@kiss100.demon.co.uk Date: Tue Mar 5 06:06:15 1996 In article: <DnrMsq.239.0.bloor@torfree.net> bu765@torfree.net (Mike Corley) wr I got a few > "go away" replies, and one from a Labour MP saying he was aware of my situatio > but wouldn't help me because he regarded me as the "bad guy". Which Labour MP Mike? > -- --------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Andy Howard EMail andy@kiss100.demon.co.uk | | My opinions, not my employer's (Jolly nice people though they are). | | If my employers shared my opinions... Well, frankly I'd be amazed | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ==================================================================== Subject: Re: Persecution in the U.K. Newsgroups: uk.misc,uk.politics,uk.media,uk.legal,alt.politics.british,soc.culture.br$ Followup-To: uk.misc,uk.politics,uk.media,uk.legal,alt.politics.british,soc.culture.b$ References: <DnFtLs.E37.0.bloor@torfree.net> <4h45nq$87o_002@leeds.ac.uk> <4h6gkb$ivc$ Organization: Toronto Free-Net Distribution: Mike Corley (bu765@torfree.net) wrote: : >Do you happen to have a copy of this MPs letter? After all, a scanned : >copy of it would lend great weight to your case here. At the moment, : >you've offered us nothing in the way of evidence, which is one of the : >main reasons we all think you've truly gone fishing. So? : The letter was by email, not on paper. (In addition to snail-mailing, I : emailed all the relevant addresses I could find.) I'll see if I can find : it, I keep a record of most of this correspondence so I may still have it. I'm afraid I don't have a copy of the correspondence. In future I will keep useful letters, so with luck there may be a "next time". The MP was Jeff Rooker, Labour MP. Having looked again at the Labour web page I find he doesn't have an address listed, but I have a record of his address as having been jeff.rooker@geo2.poptel.org.uk. I don't know where I got the address from. I'm so disorganised! ==================================================================== Newsgroups: uk.misc,uk.politics,uk.media,uk.legal,alt.politics.british From: J.J.Smith@ftel.co.uk (John J Smith) Subject: Re: Persecution in the U.K. X-Nntp-Posting-Host: death-on-the-rock.ftel.co.uk Message-ID: <Dnw49L.D1H@ftel.co.uk> Sender: smid@death-on-the-rock.ftel.co.uk (RFC931) Organization: Fujitsu Telecommunications Europe Ltd References: <DnFtLs.E37.0.bloor@torfree.net> <DnrMsq.239.0.bloor@torfree.net> <Dnsrnu.Jr1.0.bloor@torfree.net> <DntKEo.86E.0.bloor@torfree.net> Date: Thu, 7 Mar 1996 09:12:56 GMT Lines: 54 In article <DntKEo.86E.0.bloor@torfree.net>, Mike Corley <bu765@torfree.net> wrote: >Mike Corley (bu765@torfree.net) wrote: >: >Do you happen to have a copy of this MPs letter? After all, a scanned >: >copy of it would lend great weight to your case here. At the moment, >: >you've offered us nothing in the way of evidence, which is one of the >: >main reasons we all think you've truly gone fishing. So? > >: The letter was by email, not on paper. (In addition to snail-mailing, I >: emailed all the relevant addresses I could find.) I'll see if I can find >: it, I keep a record of most of this correspondence so I may still have it. > >I'm afraid I don't have a copy of the correspondence. In future I will keep >useful letters, so with luck there may be a "next time". Don't believe you. Because that might be proof, and we just *cant* have that. >The MP was Jeff Rooker, Labour MP. Having looked again at the Labour web page I >find he doesn't have an address listed, but I have a record of his address as >having been jeff.rooker@geo2.poptel.org.uk. I don't know where I got the >address from. I'm so disorganised! I did Email this MP yesterday. This is what I wrote: Smid>I am sorry to bother you, but there is a person with a known Smid>personality disorder on the internet usenet, claiming that you Smid>as an MP have backed up his claims that he is being persecuted Smid>by MI5. Smid>His name is Mike Corely, and posts from canada (email address Smid>available if you require). Smid> Smid>He claims that you have told him that his claims that the Smid>"television is watching him", are justified, yet cannot find the Smid>email in which he did so.. Smid>I'd be interested in what you have said to him, because we have Smid>had a long term battle to convince him that he really is schizophrenic Smid>and that Chris Tarrent, MI5 and Martin Lewis from News On Ten are Smid>persecuting him... If you do have the original Email, then that'd Smid>be nice... Smid>If you nothing of this subject, it would not suprise me, however. His reply, surpise, suprise was: MP>No idea what you are on about. I am getting really sick of some of MP>the junk on E mail. I just dump it so he may have contacted MP>but as to an answer I 've better things to do. Your move, Mike. Smid 10164 Tag: Check Box Form Field Value in If Then Else Calculation Tag: 101784
  - 3
    - MI5 Persecution: Flight or fight 7/1/96 (8650) From: huge@axalotl.demon.co.uk (Hugh Davies) Newsgroups: uk.misc Subject: Re: persecution rant (re-post) Reply-To: huge@axalotl.demon.co.uk Date: Sun Jan 7 04:43:41 1996 Yo, Mike, Happy New Year! Haven't you killed yourself yet? In article <DKMIs5.158.0.bloor@torfree.net>, bu765@torfree.net (Mike Corley) wri >For anyone who hasn't yet read this, There is no-one in the known Universe who hasn't read this at least 5 times. >and really really wants to then here No-one wants to read it, Mike. It's drivel. >is the article that was posted last year in this newsgroup.... Over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over again.... -- Regards, Huge. ================================================== Subject: persecution rant (re-post) Newsgroups: uk.misc Organization: Toronto Free-Net Summary: Keywords: >Yo, Mike, Happy New Year! Haven't you killed yourself yet? But I can't, you see then I wouldn't know how things would turn out ("we're only doing this because we don't know how it's all going to end" - logic error in line 100) >There is no-one in the known Universe who hasn't read this at least 5 times. It doesn't seem to have done a whole lot of good since the good old persecution stuff is still going on. Over Christmas I was flying BA and got hassled by a couple of people on the flight (sounds like something you've heard before, doesn't it?). All the usual stuff about the town I'd been staying, "he doesn't know who we are", self-justification that we're doing it because he's a "nutter" etc. Real friendly like. Also a fairly obvious wind-up and attempt to get some reaction. I think they're trying quite hard to get a reaction. If I hit someone on a flight over the Atlantic, am I actually breaking any laws, and if so whose? Is a BA aircraft British territory subject to British laws while it's in mid-flight? It is really tempting to "reply" and that's obviously what they want, so who am I to refuse a blow to the head for people who ask for it so consistently? 8650 Tag: Check Box Form Field Value in If Then Else Calculation Tag: 101783
  - 4
    - MI5 Persecution: Dihydrocodeine 26/11/95 (7136) From: michaelm@easynet.co.uk (michaelm@easynet.co.uk) Newsgroups: uk.misc,uk.media,uk.politics,alt.politics.british,alt.radio.uk Subject: Re: Britain's Shame (repost) Date: Sun, 26 Nov 1995 09:19:13 GMT Organization: ------------ Lines: 89 Message-ID: <817374781.20251@michaelm.easynet.co.uk> References: <DIM34L.755.0.bloor@torfree.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: michaelm.easynet.co.uk X-NNTP-Posting-Host: michaelm.easynet.co.uk X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82 bu765@torfree.net (Mike Corblymee) wrote: | In June 1990 a horrifying campaign of harassment was initiated in London by | what are believed to be elements of the security services. The harassment has | continued for over five years, starting from the broadcast and print media, | and encompassing abuse through set-up situations and by people in public | places. It has been brought to the attention of the police and they are aware | what is happening, but are not taking any action to prevent it. <whopping great snip of 884 lines> corley, you puzzle me! i've narrowed your possible motives down to one or more of the following: 1) you work on behalf of the british government with a hidden agenda of furthering the largely right wing (most to hide) censorship brigade's cause, "a drug-crazed psycho posting dangerous nonsense - how very very sad - but in the public interest,we must act." draft internet (censorship) bills rolling off hm govt's banders at this very moment, I don't doubt it! 2) you work for the daily mail which has started to feel the "internet pinch" as it suddenly clicks in the chronically adled minds of yet more and more of their readers - that shudder-inducing realisation that the entire editorial staff at the mail are scaremongering, imbecilic, blood-leeching , totalitarian twats - can any else sense a coordinated campaign on its way ??- "Mail urges (their) government to act - internet safety endangered by uncontrolled surfing lunatics - boys hands blown off by internet maniacs - net porn responsible for 392323rd rape " .net porn responsible for 392324th rape " .net porn responsible for 392325th rape " .net porn responsible for 392326th rape " .net porn responsible for 392327th rape " net porn responsible for 392328th rape " .net porn responsible for 392329th rape " <yawn> .net porn responsible for 392330th rape " .net porn responsible for 392331st rape " .net porn responsible for 392332nd rape " net porn responsible for 392333rd rape " <yawn> .net porn responsible for 392334th rape " .net porn responsible for 392335th rape " .net porn responsible for 392336th rape " .net porn responsible for 392337th rape " net porn responsible for 392338th rape " etcetera, straight from the old nag's mouth.. lee-potter (and english), take particular note.. (how ever you two common ********* managed to avoid encarceration for what was, quite evidently,wilful contempt of court in the regina v taylforth & knights case, is frankly beyond me.. those dreaded and now all too familiar words "endemic corruption" were muttered by at least one Q.C. >3) you (at least) believe there's (some) substance to your claim(s) and you >have a genuine axe to grind. If so, bloody well go for it, but scrape the >heavy layer of steaming dung off the top (that's assuming you're even >capable of distinguishing fantasy from reality.) 4) you (as an email address) are serving as some bizarre "educational" programme orchestrated by the psychiatric industry - ever keen to justify enforced electrical lobotomies, electroshock and dwugs .All poised for the echo? - "corley frigging well needs lobotomising" 5) you're just clinically insane with absolutely no comprehension or insight into the consequences you will possibly face as a result of repeatedly posting what, certainly on the face of it, looks like complete and utter bullshit. 6) you're some weirdo prankster(s) - probably a group of student psychiatrists having a cheap crack whilst high as kites on pilfered dihydrocodeine. 7) You are infact working for the ss yourself, gauging public awareness of the extent and methods of bugging - infinity transmitters, microwave surveillance devices, satellite tracking equipment, 'chipping' of black crims, say no more. 8) You're fuelling the central usenet administration committee, who, it is believed, are keen to see the introduction of a wide-reaching framework of self-created powers relating to posting cancellation. (see the 'son of RFC1036') my bet's on (5) - but just fuck off corley- irritate the lard-arsed canucks instead. The cia's financing of "professor" cameron's brain-washing experiments in montreal.. would be a good starting point ... or perhaps "professor" watts and his widely admired masterful double eye-jabbing trick - a couple of wallops with an icepick. such a waste of perfectly edible four year old hispanics !!!!.. Perhaps the old marylebone rd posse could fill us in with a few more facts on this one...?? You are all on the .net now ????? A very warm welcome :-) ... christmas rapidly approaching.. >business booming?? Do we all get a look in at flotation ??!! ====================================================== From: Gulliver <kst2co@herts.ac.uk> Newsgroups: uk.misc,uk.media,uk.politics,alt.politics.british,alt.radio.uk Subject: Re: Britain's Shame (repost) Date: Sun, 26 Nov 1995 18:25:32 +0000 Organization: University of Hertfordshire Lines: 12 Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.951126182156.16879B-100000@altair.herts.ac.uk> References: <DIM34L.755.0.bloor@torfree.net> <817343873snz@objmedia.demon.co.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: altair.herts.ac.uk Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII In-Reply-To: <817343873snz@objmedia.demon.co.uk> Actually, upon thinking about Mike's story it reminds me of someone I heard about who suffered from a persecution copmlex. He was an immigrant from some Eastern Bloc country who believed that 30 years after he emigrated the KGB were still after him. He would blame them if he had difficulty unlocking his car for instance (he reckoned they were putting something into the locks!). Something is very wrong, probably in Mike's head but what the hell, loonies make life more fun! -- Angus Gulliver ======================================================= Subject: Castrate the depraved MI5 buggers now Newsgroups: uk.misc Organization: Toronto Free-Net >Something is very wrong, probably in Mike's head but what the hell, >loonies make life more fun! Something is very wrong when the security services abandon their usual target of politicians and the well-known, to pursue the hitherto unknown nonentities such as myself. >corley, you puzzle me! Why? Because of my pathological truthfulness? >3) you (at least) believe there's (some) substance to your claim(s) and you >have a genuine axe to grind. If so, bloody well go for it, but scrape the >heavy layer of steaming dung off the top (that's assuming you're even >capable of distinguishing fantasy from reality.) Bloody well go for it I will. I think the "standard spiel" is quite studded with facts actually. There's plenty of "meat" there if the appropriate people can be motivated to get their act together and pursue the case. >my bet's on (5) - but just fuck off corley- irritate the lard-arsed canucks >instead. The cia's financing of "professor" cameron's brain-washing the lard-arsed canucks (?) are irritating me, but you don't want to hear about that >business booming?? Do we all get a look in at flotation ??!! 7136 Tag: Check Box Form Field Value in If Then Else Calculation Tag: 101782
  - 5
    - A content control like MS's citation, bibliography, TOC, etc.? In Word 2007, inserting a bibliography, citation or table of contents adds content controls that have features I'd like to use too. But I don't see how. Insert a bibliography or table of contents, click in it, and you'll see commands where the title would be. Add a citation, click in it, and you'll see a drop-down list in which the entries are commands. Is there a way for us to create such high-powered content controls, too? I didn't see documentation on how to add commands to content controls, so I thought I'd use Visual Studio to peek at those super controls and see what's going on. But the ContentControls collection doesn't see them. John Tag: Check Box Form Field Value in If Then Else Calculation Tag: 101781
  - 6
    - MI5 Persecution: A new Kafka? 3/10/95 (5622) Newsgroups: uk.misc,soc.culture.british,uk.media,uk.politics From: jackson@soldev.tti.com (Dick Jackson) Subject: Re: What it's like to be watched by the security services Message-ID: <1995Oct13.225312.6514@ttinews.tti.com> Sender: usenet@ttinews.tti.com (Usenet Admin) Nntp-Posting-Host: soldev Organization: Citicorp-TTI at Santa Monica (CA) by the Sea References: <DFy9tB.3JK.0.bloor@torfree.net> <813188298snz129.os2.7@blackcat.demon.co.uk> <DGE7uJ.8tF.0.bloor@torfree.net> Date: Fri, 13 Oct 1995 22:53:12 GMT Lines: 34 In article <DGE7uJ.8tF.0.bloor@torfree.net> bu765@torfree.net (Mike Corley) writes: > >Strangers in the street have recognized me on sight many times, and shown >awareness of the current thread of abuse. To give you one example, in 1992 >I was seriously ill, and a manager at work somewhat humouroursly said that >"it wasn't fair" that people were bullying me. A few days later, I >attended for the first time a clinic in London as an outpatient, and on my >way out was accosted by someone who asked if "they had paid my fare", with >emphasis on the word "fare". He repeated the word several times in this >different context; that they should have paid my "fare", each time >emphasising the word. > >For two and a half years from the time their harassment started until >November 1992 I refused to see a psychiatrist, because I reasoned that I >was not ill of my own action or fault, but through the stress caused by >harassment, and that a lessening of the illness would have to be >consequent to a removal of its immediate cause, in other words a cessation >of harassment. I also reasoned that since they were taunting me with jokes >about mental illness, if I were to seek treatment then the abusers would >think that they had "won" and been proved "right". <I've deleted a lot, but I think this gives the idea> I have so far not contributed to this tread, it has been unpleasant in my opinion. However, I was struck by the resemblance of the above passages to the writing of Franz Kafka. Viz. while from an objective viewpoint it seems to refer to a abnormal world, in a strange way it does resonate strongly at other levels. Mr. Corley, have you tried to write for publication? I honestly think it might lead somewhere positive. Dick Jackson (serious for a change and expecting to get beaten up) 5622 Tag: Check Box Form Field Value in If Then Else Calculation Tag: 101780
  - 7
    - MI5 Persecution: Do they fear truth? 3/10/95 (4108) From: flames@flames.cityscape.co.uk (Peter Krüger) Newsgroups: uk.misc,soc.culture.british,uk.politics,alt.politics.british Subject: Re: What it's like to be watched by the security services Date: 3 Oct 1995 15:38:20 GMT Organization: Steinkrug Publications Lines: 66 Message-ID: <44rldc$nrm@news.cityscape.co.uk> References: <DFus24.HxB.0.bloor@torfree.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: aa040.du.pipex.com X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.92.6+ In article <DFus24.HxB.0.bloor@torfree.net>, bu765@torfree.net (Mike Corley) says: > >It completely mystifies me how it can be done. One night in June 1992 I >was in a bed-and-breakfast in Oxford (some hard facts now, you?ll be >bored of the generalisations). I booked the B&B from the office phone. >So if they had the office bugged, or the phone system bugged, they could >have heard the call. If it was as late as 1992 then there was already a system available to feed digital video out of a domestic TV via the mains. Each raster of video was preceded by a sixteen bit address which identified the television set. All that was needed was a decoder box plugged into the mains somewhere between your room and the grid transformer. The signal was decoded and then fed down to the phone line. They probably even had a PC which enabled them to see the picture as well. By 1992 the technology had moved on from slowscan to near real time video with the advent of devices from Brooktree and Harris etc. >the newsreader reacted. Breathed deeply, as if in psychological relief. Maybe, or perhaps as if in:- sci.psychology.announce sci.psychology.consciousness sci.psychology.journals.psyche sci.psychology.journals.psycoloquy sci.psychology.misc sci.psychology.personality sci.psychology.psychotherapy sci.psychology.research sci.psychology.theory >I can't describe to you what goes through your mind when you know >someone on TV is "seeing" you the viewer. You?re doing OK so far. >Your instinct is to switch the TV off, to change channel, Not much point unless you switch off the TV at the mains >like an ostrich, Looks like Ostrich farming is going to catch on in the UK as you may have seen in some of the other uk newsgroups >The one time I did directly ask someone in the company who knew what was >going on, first he spewed wool about, "well we have to think what is >reality and what is proof anyway", then went into barefaced denial liar >mode. It opens your eyes, if they can't say out loud what they keep >saying in a disguised fashion, they must fear exposure, they must fear >the truth. wool_ barefaced_ denial_ liar_ eyes_ fashion_ fear_ exposure, How is your mother these days Mike? And BTW - How is the thesis coming along? Peter Kruger ------------------------------------------------------------ http://www.gold.net/flames/ flames@flames.cityscape.co.uk 4108 Tag: Check Box Form Field Value in If Then Else Calculation Tag: 101779
  - 8
    - MI5 Persecution: Grievous Bodily Harm 2/10/95 (2594) From: jeibisch@revolver.demon.co.uk (James Eibisch) Newsgroups: uk.misc,soc.culture.british,uk.politics,uk.media,rec.arts.tv.uk.misc Subject: Re: Auntie gets it in the emails Reply-To: jeibisch@revolver.demon.co.uk Date: Mon Oct 2 19:44:19 1995 lig0007@queens-belfast.ac.uk (TOM OATES) wrote: >However, I'm pleased to say that, in the past couple of days, Mike Corley has >stopped doing it and he appears (I say this cautiously) to be acting more >reasonably. True, his postings are still based on paranoid delusions. >However, so long as he doesn't go back to his old practices of multiple, >identical, unreadable postings, I'm sure that most people on this newsgroup >are willing to put up with him. Time to come out of the woodwork of this thread (or variations thereof)... I find it annoying that discussion of Mike's situation is spread over multiple threads - it makes it hard to follow, and especially to follow up. If it could be consolidated into one thread on relevant newsgroups (I'm reading this on uk.media btw). I'm a little surprised with the volume of abuse Mike has received, but believe strongly in freedom of speech if such a thing were to exist, which clearly includes abuse as much as anything. One thing which has been missing from this discussion is this simple prognosis: that maybe Mike is right and that, despite his admitted mental condition, there really is a campaign against him organised by now-influential ex-students of his university. Does anyone remember the TV series GBH, a fictional account of security service and governmental power games? Fictional, certainly, but one of the most powerful pieces of TV drama I've seen in many years, fascinating and quite believable, even. The fact is, as Mike has pointed out (oh, so many times :-), that the security services _do_ have the influence, contacts, resources, and time to conduct such a campaign of surveillance and even psychological terror if they so chose. If they have this power, then they will surely use it We still don't have all the facts from Mike, and the most pertinent here I think would be about his time at university - the people who took against him, the ringleaders. We need to know far more about Mike: his political and social affiliations, put in context with his univeristy years, the enemies he made, the reasons people ganged up on him at the very early stages. I don't subscribe to conspiracy theories generally, but I know there is far more that goes on in the universities, old boy's clubs, civil and secret services and Parliament than is ever made public. Mike, I leave it to you to construct a _single_ thread in a relevant newsgroup about this topic and keep to this thread to give us new information and answer questions about your situation. Ignore the 'Mike Corley is a nutter' posts unless they are relevant. Give us more detail. Who knows? It may be true, stranger things have happened. _ James Eibisch ('v') N : E : T : A : D : E : L : I : C : A Reading, U.K. (,_,) http://metro.turnpike.net/J/jeibisch/ ======= ------------------------------- Tue, 03 Oct 1995 04:01:34 uk.misc Thread 3 of 14 Lines 58 Re: Auntie gets it in the emails Respno 16 of 16 J.J.Smith@ftel.co.uk John J Smith at Fujitsu Telecommunications Europe Ltd In article <812677261.12841@revolver.demon.co.uk>, James Eibisch <jeibisch@revolver.demon.co.uk> wrote: >lig0007@queens-belfast.ac.uk (TOM OATES) wrote: >One thing which has been missing from this discussion is this simple >prognosis: that maybe Mike is right and that, despite his admitted >mental condition, there really is a campaign against him organised by >now-influential ex-students of his university. We're trying to find this out on uk.misc. He's posted some *new* *huge* replies (which I'd have to give up my day job to reply to), detailing some things like: a) Mike Corley is *not* his real name b) Exactly what the "abuse" is (it seems be such things, as taking completely unrelated newspaper articles, striving to make them a disgusting insult, then redirecting against himself). c) How he came to the conclusion. I think he's doing rather better nowadays.. >Does anyone remember the TV series GBH, a fictional account of security >service and governmental power games? Fictional, certainly, but one of >the most powerful pieces of TV drama I've seen in many years, >fascinating and quite believable, even. This would be a point, apart from the fact that this was directed against someone of political importance. I don't believe Mike is... >The fact is, as Mike has pointed out (oh, so many times :-), that the >security services _do_ have the influence, contacts, resources, and time >to conduct such a campaign of surveillance and even psychological terror >if they so chose. If they have this power, then they will surely use it >at some point against some people. It appears he has formed the Security Service conclusion, because they are the only ones capable of doing it. A "searching for an enemy capable of it". >We still don't have all the facts from Mike, and the most pertinent here >I think would be about his time at university - the people who took >against him, the ringleaders. We need to know far more about Mike: his >political and social affiliations, put in context with his univeristy >years, the enemies he made, the reasons people ganged up on him at the >very early stages. I'm beginning to think that we never will get all the facts from Mike. We may, however, get enough... >Mike, I leave it to you to construct a _single_ thread in a relevant >newsgroup about this topic and keep to this thread to give us new >information and answer questions about your situation. Ignore the 'Mike >Corley is a nutter' posts unless they are relevant. Uk.misc, me boy... Smid ========================================================== From: flames@flames.cityscape.co.uk (Peter Kr|ger) Newsgroups: uk.misc,soc.culture.british,uk.media,uk.politics,alt.politics.british,alt.conspiracy Subject: Re: What it's like to be watched by the security services Date: Tue Oct 3 15:41:54 1995 In article <44rrrh$t6v@news.ox.ac.uk>, idaniel@jesus.ox.ac.uk (Illtud Daniel) says: > >And what do you mean when you state that the symptoms are too >'textbook'? Are the textbooks wrong? I think what is meant by 'textbook' is that some of the symptoms of 'illness' displayed in the posts seem to have been lifted from textbooks describing mental instability and personality disorders. I must admit I haven't seen Mike's postings before has he only just started posting again? Peter Kruger ------------------------------------------------------------ http://www.gold.net/flames/ flames@flames.cityscape.co.uk 2594 Tag: Check Box Form Field Value in If Then Else Calculation Tag: 101778
  - 9
    - MI5 Persecution: Goldfish and Piranha 29/9/95 (1080) I just thought I'd let you know what I've been reading into the "Crusader" spam. I don't want to post this to usenet because somebody might try to tie that in to my posts in some way (someone already has, in uk.misc). First of all, I'd like to ask you to believe that my phone line in my apartment is bugged, and has been for many months. I have moved a couple of times this year, but "they" have faithfully been on my trail. Anyway, let's suppose my phone line is bugged. Now, when I talk to my internet service provider, it's over a SLIP (now PPP) connection. So if you wanted to bug what was said, either you'd listen in over the line and have to decode the transmission, or you could go to the service provider (more difficult) and ask them to decode a particular user's connection. OK, so now they're listening to everything I do over my SLIP/PPP connection. A couple of months ago I was messing around with faking articles through nntp servers and through anonymous remailers. I chose a nice inconspicuous newsgroup for my little tests, something no-one would ever notice. Guess which newsgroup I chose??? Yes, _FISH_!!! or rec.aquaria to be precise And guess what articles I tried to post? Goldfish, Koi carp and, you'll never guess... PIRANHA!!! The goldfish article and the Koi went through, but the piranha didn';t appear. by now you probably think this is too silly for words. But if you look in the papers a few eeks ago you will find John Major, Tonny Blair and Paddy Ashdown sharing a "private joke" about Major's sunburnt goldfish. We haven't had anything about Koi yet (they must be too dull ). Now, sent by someone who clearly knew what they were doing (they chose an Italian backbone site for their launch point) we have many thousands of messages to people all over the globe. All about piranha, and with the punchline "that gives you something to think about, doesn't it?" The way it works is that they're trying to kill two birds with one stone again. I don't knoiw why they should be against these national alliance people, but my interpretation is that they simultaneously try to discredit them, and stem the flow of Corley articles. ================================================================= In article <DFnE55.8tF.0.bloor@torfree.net>, Mike Corley <bu765@torfree.net> wrote: > >John J Smith (J.J.Smith@ftel.co.uk) wrote: > >: b) we do know who you are. Or are you someone else we don't know about? >: You are currently known as "That bloody persistant net nutter, who's >: expanding from uk.misc to the rest of the world". > >I think the point I was trying to make is that I could tell you things >from my personal life, at home and at work, which would add credibility >to my story. But if I named people, then (a) they would object violently >to being included in this shenanigans, and (b) I would be revealing my >identity which would be bad for my personal life and my work life. Of >course some people in my personal life, and at work, do know who "mike >corley" is. But at least we're observing a studied silence for now. :People can always be called "MR X", to save them being named. : :I'm completely perplexed as to what you mean by b). Revealing identity? :To who? And why would this be bad for any part of your life when you :already have a less than respectful reputation here? I'll just enumerate one or two things that I can still remember. Sometime around August/Sept 1992 I was living in a house in Oxford, and coming out of the house was physically attacked by someone - not punched, just grabbed by the coat, with some verbals thrown in for good measure. That was something the people at work shouldn't have known about... but soon after a couple of people were talking right in front of me about, "yeah, I heard he was attacked". Again, one I went for a walk in some woods outside Oxford. The next day, at work, someone said "you know he went to the forest yesterday". I don't want to put details on usenet of what happened because to do so would be to risk it happening again. If you put ideas in peoples' heads then you can find them reflecting back at you, and I don't want that. Also I can't remember that much from three years ago. From november 1992 I started taking "major tranquilizers" and just blotted the whole thing from my mind. >This is a feature time and time again, that the security services >(presumed) get at you by manipulating other people around you to get at >you. If you have their contacts, manpower, resources and technology then >you can do that sort of thing. :But why? Are you a threat? They pretend they "have" to get at me. After the first few weeks they had to find a reason to spy and abuse. You can't abuse someone unless they're in the wrong in some way. What I did "wrong" was to be ill. So it became "nutter" and "monster" and "he's going to attack us" coupled with "ha ha ha, he can't do anything to defend himself, it was so funny". That obvious contradiction within their propaganda is something they blithely ignore. :So, the Security Services never *actually* appear, and you assume that :they get someone else to do your dirty work. This is a bit of a big :logical step, here: That person doesn't like me, or is causing me trouble, :it's not because they've got problems themselves, it must be the "Security :Services". Yes. Because people are infallible. Or is there more? A single source is indicated because of the range of harassment. BBC + Capital + manipulated_public_at_large + set_up_situations, what does that add up to? Add in the technology to carry out the covert spying and the manpower and knowhow to follow you around for five years without being spotted. It smells very much of the security services, because there is no other organization (to my knowledge) which does the things I've seen these people do. Remember, they have deliberately chosen the softest of soft targets to victimize. They purposely chose a mentally ill person who they thought would be likely to kill himself anyway, so that they could get away with murder. And in all likelihood it will have started as a personal vendetta by someone. Who could that be? I don't know, but I can give you some clues. The first possibility (deep breath) is that someone from my college set me up. Six years ago I graduated from university in the UK, during the last year there I was steadily getting more and more ill. I know that I was talking in my sleep; although I don't know what I was saying, it got me a reputation, and if someone from my college talked afterwards to the "wrong" people then that could be the reason for all that has followed. I think that's the strongest contender for source. Directly beneath my room lived another bloke who frequently had his friends round late at night, after the time that I went to sleep. So they could have heard what I was saying in my sleep, and that could have got me the reputation for "talking to myself". What I don't know is why that should have rebounded a year after I left. You'd think it would have happened sooner; it's a bit odd to wait for a year and then start abuse. That leads me to question what in particular happened around May/June 1990 for them to start then. >What I don't know is how it looks from the other side, from the side of >the people who are being manipulated to get at me. On a couple of >occasions I have challenged people to tell the truth of the matter, but >they have alwats ducked the challenge. :Have you ever considered the possibility, that you have made a mistake, and :the people don't know what you are talking about? Yes. I am currently considering the possibility that some people around me know only what is being posted on Usenet, and have not been "contacted" by "them". But I _know_ that others have been contacted. :What words? Are they in common use? Could they be a catchphrase of a :popular comedian?: "Nice to see you, to see you nice"? In England the all-time No. 1 is "nutter". Easter this year, returning home from Clapham police station to report five years of harassment ("we're not saying it's happening and we're not saying it isn't happening"), another "not happening" incident of harassment when a cowardly little slut did her country proud by yelling "nutter, nutter, nutter" in the face of the hated enemy. What can you do about that? You can't yell abuse back in their face, because they know they're supported by their peers, by the media, by the murderers in the security forces. You can't put them down when the fascist establishment is on their side. You can't hit them, because they would deny their abuse, they would deny knowing anything, and bring charges against the "nutter" who attacked them "at random". >You know, you're >passing saomeone, they're hardly going to construct an argument for your >benefit, so they work a word of abuse into the conversation which they >can giggle at. :Abuse such as what? We're all adults here, we can take it. Is this abuse :aimed at you? How can you tell it is? I think I've said already what the words are. Thing is, at any given time the language is consistent. In January everyone's calling you X, then a few weeks later people stop calling you X and start calling you Y. You can tell it's aimed at me, because when people repeatedly say the same words are you walk past, then laugh, you would have to be hard of understanding not to recognize it. >Or they repeat something that's been said somewhere else... the PE thing >being a case in point. PE says it, then other people pick up the refrain. :Remind me who PE is again. PE = "Private Eye" >: >To give you an example, which I mentioned in another posting. In around >: >October 1992, Private Eye ran a cover with the heading "Major's support >: >lowest ever", with John calling to Norma on the cover "come back, Norma". >: >Only one obvious interpretation to that, isn';;t there? I certainly >: >thought so when I saw that cover. Wrongo!! Down the pub with people from work >: >Simon says to phil, "don';t you think it's wrong then?" phil says, "well >: >private eye are usuallyright"..."hislop strikes again.. > >: Erm. Mike? Heeeelllllooo? What are you on about. What is the other >: interpretation then? Norma having an affair? Seems a bit wrong, with the >: heading "Majors support Lowest ever"... > >No, this one isn't obvious , it really does need to be explained. I >certainly didn't understand it when I first saw it. You see, the kernel >of vitriol is in the words "come back". At the time, the themes of >abuse were centred around interpretations of those two words (stretch your >mind a little bit, I don't have to spell it out for you, surely). :You did in your mail item. : :You seem to be scouting about something called a "Double Entendre". The :inference being "Come" = Ejaculation, "Back" = Anus (not the first part :of the body I would have went for, I would have foolishly gone for "Back", :silly old me). : :You see to have picked a sodomy double entendre out of a Private Eye :headline. They are everywhere. The English language has much double :meaning in it, and if you put your mind to it, you could pull a double :entendre out of a randomly chosen page of the bible. So what? >The point is that when Simon pointed it out to Phil, he did recognise >what it meant after a moment's thought... and so did I... and so did the >people who repeated it several times later... so however murky it may >seem to you, that is the meaning they intended it to have... I still don't really know if the meaning was intended when that headline was written, or if it was simply "found" after the fact. The reason I think it might be the former is that I got quite a lot of abuse along the lines of "sound-alike" or "double-entendre" at work, in particularly from Steve. So "double" inevitably came to mean split-personality, "two people in one"; "back" inevitably came to mean "backside", "come" inevitably meant you-know- what, "split" (well, we'd better split now) again you can guess, "bent" (of a similar bent), the list goes on forever. These aren't "nice" double- entendres intended for comedy, they're nasty words to humiliate and cause pain. If I could turn the clock back three years then I would sue my former employers for harassment and I would almost certainly win. I had to take pills after a year of Oxford, so they wouldn't be able to lie their way out of it. Actually, I could still take them to court - the main obstacle being that three years after the fact is a bit late and much of what happened, the details that would be necessary for a case to go to court, has just been obliterated by time. : Smid ============================================== From: flames@flames.cityscape.co.uk (Peter Kr|ger) Newsgroups: uk.misc,soc.culture.british,alt.conspiracy,uk.media,uk.legal Subject: Re: Mike Corley - a (helpful) suggestion Date: Mon Oct 2 05:43:42 1995 In article <812551172snz@objmedia.demon.co.uk>, Snail <snail@objmedia.demon.co.uk> says: >Indeed, I feel that my Usenet access is censored simply because I don't want >to download groups he is partaking in, because of his behaviour. > >I wasn't that bothered, but I am starting to get seriously pissed off >with him. Which takes a lot. Hi Snail This person Corley seems quite interesting for three reasons. I put the following at the end of a post in another thread just to see if he was reading any other threads in uk.media. It seems he is probably not. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Heres an interesting little story from back in the early days of CCD technology. There was this miniature camera which was designed to fit behind the infrared receiver lens of the remote control system (just beside the IR sensor itself) the camera clocked out the data in 256 lines of 256 pixels from a Fairchild chip and fed it out, a line at a time, into the VBI within the TV set itself. The signal could be picked up remotely from a standard license detector van from where it was stripped out of the surrounding RF signal and relayed back to the TV station where it was displayed as a slowscan monochrome image in a corner of the news readers monitor. 1080 Tag: Check Box Form Field Value in If Then Else Calculation Tag: 101777
  - 10
    - Print 2 Separate Documents Duplex Is there a way to send to separate one page documents to a duplexing printer, and send some kind of code so the printer knows to print the second single page document on the back side of the paper? Tag: Check Box Form Field Value in If Then Else Calculation Tag: 101774
  - 11
    - controling a never ending loop code Hi, I have code that I want to put into a loop. In essence, this loop could be never ending (and that is what I want to actually happen). However in reallity I want to be able to stop and start the loop at will. So really i think I need a non-modal form with 2 buttons (stop and start). Now doing the start button is easy, but what code would I need in the stop button to stop the 'start' code from running? Hope that makes sense and thanks for any help/pointers. Steve. Tag: Check Box Form Field Value in If Then Else Calculation Tag: 101770
  - 12
    - InsertFile (include text) or AddFromFile (master) We need to print and send some standard information with each proposal that we send out. So our people open the proposal, print it, then open the information document, print that out, then possibly a third document, and print that out. I'd like to set up a template so they open a blank document, just click a button that says "Include file" that runs a macro that lets them select each file, then links it to the document. If I use InsertFile, I lose the formatting. I can't change all the source documents to have a section break at the beginning. I thought of using Master Documents (ONLY FOR PRINTING!), figured I would use AddFromFile method with READONLY = TRUE to protect the included documents. But setting READONLY = true doesn't seem to protect the documents from being modified, so I'm afraid it won't keep them from getting corrupted. I don't really care what happens to the master document as long as the source documents stay safe. Any idea? Or should I just give up? Tag: Check Box Form Field Value in If Then Else Calculation Tag: 101765
  - 13
    - dropdown list in Word 2000 Is there a limit to the number of items that can be listed in a dropdown list; can a Word dropdown list be created from an Excel list? Tag: Check Box Form Field Value in If Then Else Calculation Tag: 101761
  - 14
    - Reason for not including images in .rtf I am trying to display some HTML body in a richtextbox. Therefor I convert the *.html file to *.rtf using the wordobject ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 'body html is a plain html file 'savertf is the path & file to save to Dim savertf As String = sLocalpath & lbl_ourref.Text & ".rtf" Dim objWord As New Word.Application With objWord .DisplayAlerts = Word.WdAlertLevel.wdAlertsNone .Documents.Open(Bodyhtml) 'savehtm) .ActiveDocument.SaveAs(savertf, 6) .ActiveDocument.Close() .Quit() end with --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I've noticed that when using Word(2003) to save .html as .rtf-file Word sometimes includes the images in the .rtf-file, but other times it does not. I've tested this with 'www.google.com' (images are included) and 'www.forkyou.nl' (images are not included) The actions taken are identical in Word('Open File'--'Save File As (RTF)' Does anyone know the reason why this difference occurs, or a way to always include the images in the RTF?? Tag: Check Box Form Field Value in If Then Else Calculation Tag: 101747
  - 15
    - Find out which type of footer is used on the current page in a given section Hi all, I am writing some code that places a picture in a document. This works perfect. I only have one question. I am setting the width of the picture to a fixed number. Then I want to check if the hight of this picture still fits on the current page. If it doesn't, I need to calculate the maximum possible height and change the width accordingly. I know I can use the Information(wdVerticalPositionRelativeToPage) to find out on what the top position is of my picture relative to the top of the page. This document has multiple sections with different for primary - and first pages. Some footers have a style with spacebefore to make the space on the page smaller then other pages. Therefor I can't just use the bottom margin of the current section. I need something like the vertical position of the selection relative to the bottom of the page but AFAIK there's no property to get this info. I can find out on which section I am working with the information property but I can't seem to figure out on which sectionpage I am working. I need this in order to find out how much space is available on the current page (pageheight - (top margin + bottom margin + space before on current footer)). Does anybody have a clue on how to solve this or perhaps a suggestion for another technique that may lead to the same results? TIA, Renate Tag: Check Box Form Field Value in If Then Else Calculation Tag: 101746
  - 16
    - Filling a protected form I have a protected form that I wish to fill in using VBA but I keep get the message that I am trying to type into a protected area. I can manually type text into this form so why can't I do the same in VBA When I record a macro as I type into the form I get something like Sub Macro2() ' ' Macro2 Macro ' Macro recorded 22/06/07 by Fred Schreuder ' Windows(1).Activate Selection.TypeText Text:="Consignee" Windows(2).Activate End Sub but if I then try to run the macro I get an error about a protect area. I am not trying to bypass any protection I just want to be able to automatically fillin the form as I would do when I type in the data. Can some please tell me if this is possible with trying to unprotect the document. thanks Fred Tag: Check Box Form Field Value in If Then Else Calculation Tag: 101742
  - 17
    - Multiple text selection in Word Hi everyone! I have a small problem; please help me to solve it if somebody knows. I have to find and select all occurrences of any string in Word document. I'm working with Word document by OLE. The sample code is : If (oWord_FoundRange.Find.Execute("Any string", , , , , , True)) Then oWord_FoundRange.Select End If oWord_Document.Activate But it selects only the first occurrence of searching string. I have to highlight all occurrences. In addition, I have not to change the document, colors etc. On other words, I have to simulate the same behavior like check box of the Word 2003 of the Find window "Select all elements, found in". Please, help me! Thanks! Igor. Tag: Check Box Form Field Value in If Then Else Calculation Tag: 101741
  - 18
    - Bizarre table behaviour - can you explain? Hi, This is Word 2002... but I'd be surprised if it was unique to Word 2002... Fed up with the DocumentMap not handling tables, I wrote my own outliner that selectively shows and hides rows... worked a treat. Then I discovered I needed some extra columns - but I've no screen estate left, so I thought why not use a similar trick to show/hide one of a pair of columns (well, alternate between v. small and "normal" width :) Works OK BUT... I only need one column of the pair at a time, so I set up a double-click show/hide routine. First, I hide a column by setting the font to hidden and then setting the width to something small, then I show the other column by first setting the width to "normal" AND ONLY THEN un-setting the font hidden attribute. ***** THE WEiRD BIT ****** What is weird is that when a previously "hidden" column is shown the text ALWAYS appears in the "narrow" column (thereby causing the row height to go crazy) even though I set the width first, before I unhide the text (it does sort itself out a moment later, but it's hell on the eyes and it takes time...) Turning off screenupdating for the duration doesn't help, and no amount of extra DoEvents calls or explicit repaginates will stop it... (all desperate measures I admit...). WHY? More to the point, can I stop it? Thanks Julian PS I have just "purged" the template and reimported all modules, so I'm confident there are no lurking corruptions... Here's the code that does the business... Sub toggleColumns(ByRef selDoc As Document, ByRef selCell As Cell) Dim aCol As Column Dim aCell As Cell Application.ScreenUpdating = False Set aCol = selCell.Range.Columns(1) showHideColumn aCol:=aCol, show:=False ' First hide a column If selCell.ColumnIndex = scratchColIdx Then Set aCol = selCell.Range.Rows(1).Cells(structureColIdx).Column ElseIf selCell.ColumnIndex = structureColIdx Then Set aCol = selCell.Range.Rows(1).Cells(scratchColIdx).Column End If showHideColumn aCol:=aCol, show:=True ' then show the other one Application.ScreenUpdating = True End Sub Sub showHideColumn(ByRef aCol As Column, ByVal show As Boolean) Dim aCell As Cell Dim oldSel As Range If aCol Is Nothing Then Exit Sub Set oldSel = Selection.Range aCol.PreferredWidthType = wdPreferredWidthPoints Select Case show Case True aCol.Select aCol.PreferredWidth = InchesToPoints(3.01) Selection.Font.Hidden = False Case False aCol.Select Selection.Font.Hidden = True aCol.PreferredWidth = InchesToPoints(0.01) End Select oldSel.Select End Sub Tag: Check Box Form Field Value in If Then Else Calculation Tag: 101736
  - 19
    - Automate bookmark naming of formfields I have a macro that adds a row (with formfields) to a 3 column table. Is there a way I can take care of the naming convention for the formfields? Eg. When the macro is used the first time....the first row is inserted with 3 formfields - Column1 formfield would have a bookmark name: text1 Column2 formfield would have a bookmark name: text2 Column3 formfield would have a bookmark name: text3.... If the macro is used again...the second row is inserted with 3 formfields - Column1 formfield would have a bookmark name: text4 Column2 formfield would have a bookmark name: text5 Column3 formfield would have a bookmark name: text6....and so on... All help is appreciated! Tag: Check Box Form Field Value in If Then Else Calculation Tag: 101731
  - 20
    - printing VB macros Is there any way (i.e., a macro or builtin) to print all the macros in a VB project? Or to copy them to a Word file? (Particularly where there are many modules and itâ??s a bit of a pain to copy and paste all the modules into Word manually.) Iâ??m using Word 2003 at the office, but Word 97 at home. Tag: Check Box Form Field Value in If Then Else Calculation Tag: 101729
  - 21
    - Converting numbered list to text How can I convert the numbers in a numbered list to text by code? I can't use copy and paste as text because I can't lose the format of the text. Tag: Check Box Form Field Value in If Then Else Calculation Tag: 101726
  - 22
    - Not able to jump to bookmark Hello ! I want to generate an automated invoice in Word with data from Access. VBA in Access triggers the function, calls Word and should jump to certain bookmarks and enter text. (please see the code fragments below) Jumping to bookmarks works perfectly well in Word and with Word macros. But calling the code from Access returns several errors when trying to jump to a bookmark. Everything else (entering text, etc.) works ! The errors tell me "Runtime error 5102" and "Runtime error 5101". Would be great if anyone could help me with this issue ! Thanks in advance ! Best, Konstantin Here is the code: (it's not finished yet !) Sub CreateInvoice(company_id As Integer, date_start As Date, date_end As Date) Dim db As Database Dim wdobj As Object Dim rst As Recordset Dim sqlCompanyAddress As String Set db = CurrentDb() Set wdobj = CreateObject("word.application") With wdobj .Visible = True .Documents.Add Template:="C:\Templates\Invoice.dot", _ NewTemplate:=False, DocumentType:=0 sqlCompanyAddress = "SELECT " & _ "tblCompany.Company, tblAddress.Department, tblAddress.Street, " & _ "tblAddress.PostCode, tblAddress.City, tblCountry.Name " & _ "FROM tblCountry INNER JOIN " & _ "(tblCompany INNER JOIN tblAddress ON tblCompany.ID = tblAddress.Company_ID) " & _ "ON tblCountry.ID = tblAddress.Country_ID " & _ "WHERE (((tblAddress.BillingAddress)=True))" Set rst = db.OpenRecordset(sqlCompanyAddress) .selection.Goto What:=wdGoToBookmark, Name:="address" .selection.TypeText rst!company & Chr(13) & rst!Department & Chr(13) & rst!Street & _ Chr(13) & Chr(13) & rst!PostCode & " " & rst!City If rst!Name <> "Deutschland" Then .selection.TypeText = Chr(13) & rst!Name End If End With End Sub Tag: Check Box Form Field Value in If Then Else Calculation Tag: 101724
  - 23
    - Problems unprotecting template, running a macro and reprotecting Good morning, I have a template that contains 3 macro buttons. I have the template password protected but I would still like users to be able to use the macro buttons. I keep running into two problems: 1. The macro buttons do not work at all when the template is password protected 2. If I protect the form and then save it and reopen it the macro buttons again do not work. But if I reopen the document and then reprotect it (with out a password) the macros work fine. Here are the macros I am trying to run: A) Option Explicit Sub add_page() If ActiveDocument.ProtectionType <> wdNoProtection Then ActiveDocument.Unprotect Password:="summer" End If Selection.EndKey Unit:=wdStory ActiveDocument.AttachedTemplate.AutoTextEntries("AddTable").Insert _ Where:=Selection.Range, RichText:=True ActiveDocument.Fields.Update ActiveDocument.Protect Type:=wdAllowOnlyFormFields, _ NoReset:=True ActiveDocument.Bookmarks("Notes2").Range.Fields(1).Result.Select End Sub B) Sub Information() If ActiveDocument.ProtectionType <> wdNoProtection Then ActiveDocument.Unprotect Password:="summer" End If frmInformation.Show If ActiveDocument.ProtectionType = wdNoProtection Then ActiveDocument.Protect Type:=wdAllowOnlyFormFields, _ NoReset:=True End If End Sub C) Sub FormsSpellCheck() ' If document is protected, Unprotect it. If ActiveDocument.ProtectionType <> wdNoProtection Then ActiveDocument.Unprotect Password:="summer" End If ' Set the language for the document. Selection.WholeStory Selection.LanguageID = wdEnglishUS Selection.NoProofing = False ' Perform Spelling/Grammar check. If Options.CheckGrammarWithSpelling = True Then ActiveDocument.CheckGrammar Else ActiveDocument.CheckSpelling End If ' ReProtect the document. If ActiveDocument.ProtectionType = wdNoProtection Then ActiveDocument.Protect Type:=wdAllowOnlyFormFields, _ NoReset:=True End If End Sub Any guidance would be greatly appreciated! Warm Regards, SMOO Tag: Check Box Form Field Value in If Then Else Calculation Tag: 101721
  - 24
    - Timer Control for Word VBA I would like to add a timer control to my Word Macros... similar to the Timer Control in VB6. Is there a control available for Word VBA? And if so... what is the reference or component that needs to be added? Thanks Tag: Check Box Form Field Value in If Then Else Calculation Tag: 101719
  - 25
    - TextBox.Value Format Hi, I have a textbox (txtPhone) that I want to have the end user enter the phone number into. What I want to do is have the 10 numbers display back to the user like: ###-###-#### or (###) ###-#### or ###.###.#### (which I can do, no problem) ... My problem is, if the user goes back to modify the number on the form before they hit "continue" I can NOT get the 10 numbers to be stored again by themselves. If I do myphone = Val(txt.Phone.value) myphone = "0" ... how do I get the txtPhone.Value to be stored as ########## and display as something else (similar to a mask). Here is my code: If Not IsNumeric(txtPhone.Text) Then If txtPhone.Text = "" Then Exit Sub Else MsgBox ("Please type numbers only") txtPhone.Text = "" cancel = True End If ElseIf txtPhone.Text = "" Then 'txtPhone = "###-###-####" Then txtPhone.Text = "" ElseIf txtPhone.TextLength <> 10 Then MsgBox ("Phone Numbers should be 10 digits") cancel = True Else txtPhone.Text = Right(Format(txtPhone.Text, "(###) ### ####"), 15) End If Thanks, Elaine Tag: Check Box Form Field Value in If Then Else Calculation Tag: 101713

I would like to use the Checked/Unchecked value of a Check Box Form Field in
a Word protected form in a calculated field without having to use a macro,
but I can't figure out what to use as the value for the conditional
statement. Using Word 2003.

{IF {Check1} = (What do I put here) "Value if True" "Value if False"}
--
Jan Pahls

Top

RE: Check Box Form Field Value in If Then Else Calculation by david

david
Tue Jun 26 14:43:05 CDT 2007

Jan:

I don't believe this can be done without VBA. If anyone knows a way, I hope
they post it. But AFAIK the Word GUI doesn't know whether or not a checkbox
is checked. In other words, there's no "value" you can test for that reflects
the state of the check box.

Bear
--
Windows XP, Word 2000

"Jan Pahls" wrote:

> I would like to use the Checked/Unchecked value of a Check Box Form Field in
> a Word protected form in a calculated field without having to use a macro,
> but I can't figure out what to use as the value for the conditional
> statement. Using Word 2003.
>
> {IF {Check1} = (What do I put here) "Value if True" "Value if False"}
> --
> Jan Pahls

Top

RE: Check Box Form Field Value in If Then Else Calculation by JanPahls

JanPahls
Tue Jun 26 14:49:01 CDT 2007

That's what I was figured, but I had to ask. I'm trying to avoid macros so I
can distribute a protected form without all the hassles involved with Macro
Security.
--
Jan Pahls

"Bear" wrote:

> Jan:
>
> I don't believe this can be done without VBA. If anyone knows a way, I hope
> they post it. But AFAIK the Word GUI doesn't know whether or not a checkbox
> is checked. In other words, there's no "value" you can test for that reflects
> the state of the check box.
>
> Bear
> --
> Windows XP, Word 2000
>
>
> "Jan Pahls" wrote:
>
> > I would like to use the Checked/Unchecked value of a Check Box Form Field in
> > a Word protected form in a calculated field without having to use a macro,
> > but I can't figure out what to use as the value for the conditional
> > statement. Using Word 2003.
> >
> > {IF {Check1} = (What do I put here) "Value if True" "Value if False"}
> > --
> > Jan Pahls

Top