I wish to save WORD Docs. on flash drive on "Compatabilty Mode". Please
e-mail answer at tdtm@sympatico.ca.
PS I usually find the title in Documents (VISTA), right-click, press SEND TO
> E (removable). When I insert drive in Windows XP Pro, I click "My Comp.", a
box comes up with the saved icons; but, they are not WORD icons (something
strange!) and it usually says 1 Kb. I click on icon and get nothing. Please
help. Thank you.

Re: How do I save Office Doc. on flash drive? by Gordon

Gordon
Thu May 15 14:49:05 PDT 2008

"Charles M. Rizzo" <Charles M. Rizzo@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in
message news:FD02CBB8-54D2-48AE-A3F5-8BD34177858A@microsoft.com...
>I wish to save WORD Docs. on flash drive on "Compatabilty Mode". Please
> e-mail answer at tdtm@sympatico.ca.
> PS I usually find the title in Documents (VISTA), right-click, press SEND
> TO
>> E (removable). When I insert drive in Windows XP Pro, I click "My Comp.",
>> a
> box comes up with the saved icons; but, they are not WORD icons (something
> strange!) and it usually says 1 Kb. I click on icon and get nothing.
> Please
> help. Thank you.


Ummm not QUITE sure what you are talking about - just do File-Save As (or in
Office 2007, Office Button-Save As...)


Re: How do I save Office Doc. on flash drive? by Terry

Terry
Thu May 15 15:14:58 PDT 2008

Don't ever save to a flash drive or any other form of removable drive. It is
the easiest way to corrupt and lose your document. Always save to the HDD
and then COPY to the rem media.

--
Terry Farrell - MSWord MVP

"Charles M. Rizzo" <Charles M. Rizzo@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in
message news:FD02CBB8-54D2-48AE-A3F5-8BD34177858A@microsoft.com...
>I wish to save WORD Docs. on flash drive on "Compatabilty Mode". Please
> e-mail answer at tdtm@sympatico.ca.
> PS I usually find the title in Documents (VISTA), right-click, press SEND
> TO
>> E (removable). When I insert drive in Windows XP Pro, I click "My Comp.",
>> a
> box comes up with the saved icons; but, they are not WORD icons (something
> strange!) and it usually says 1 Kb. I click on icon and get nothing.
> Please
> help. Thank you.


Re: How do I save Office Doc. on flash drive? by Graham

Graham
Thu May 15 22:25:36 PDT 2008

To which end, see the macro at the end of
http://www.gmayor.com/automatically_backup.htm

--
<>>< ><<> ><<> <>>< ><<> <>>< <>><<>
Graham Mayor - Word MVP

My web site www.gmayor.com
Word MVP web site http://word.mvps.org
<>>< ><<> ><<> <>>< ><<> <>>< <>><<>


Terry Farrell wrote:
> Don't ever save to a flash drive or any other form of removable
> drive. It is the easiest way to corrupt and lose your document.
> Always save to the HDD and then COPY to the rem media.
>
>
> "Charles M. Rizzo" <Charles M. Rizzo@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote
> in message news:FD02CBB8-54D2-48AE-A3F5-8BD34177858A@microsoft.com...
>> I wish to save WORD Docs. on flash drive on "Compatabilty Mode".
>> Please e-mail answer at tdtm@sympatico.ca.
>> PS I usually find the title in Documents (VISTA), right-click, press
>> SEND TO
>>> E (removable). When I insert drive in Windows XP Pro, I click "My
>>> Comp.", a
>> box comes up with the saved icons; but, they are not WORD icons
>> (something strange!) and it usually says 1 Kb. I click on icon and
>> get nothing. Please
>> help. Thank you.



Re: How do I save Office Doc. on flash drive? by Gordon

Gordon
Thu May 15 23:37:50 PDT 2008

"Terry Farrell" <terryfarrell@msn.com> wrote in message
news:8ADF9D7E-BF88-4671-BEA4-97A22F115BDD@microsoft.com...
> Don't ever save to a flash drive or any other form of removable drive. It
> is the easiest way to corrupt and lose your document. Always save to the
> HDD and then COPY to the rem media.

Why not? What's the difference between saving to a slave HDD and saving to a
memory stick that's connected to the USB bus?
I agree that in the old days of 1.44 MB floppy disks, that was a definite
no no, but in this day and age of 1, 2, 4 or 8 GB memory sticks? I think
technology has superceded that argument.


Re: How do I save Office Doc. on flash drive? by Terry

Terry
Fri May 16 02:14:12 PDT 2008

Not at all and this post is an example of why not to do it.

Perhaps some of the newest FAST flash drives used on a fast motherboard with
up to date BIOS MAY be safer. But be assured that we still regularly see
posts complaining of documents lost/corrupted through using a flash drive.

Some of the newer flash drives and motherboard combinations will let you use
them as bootable drives and these may possibly be OK. But the majority of
users will still be using equipment that doesn't support fast, bootable
drives and just are not as good as a HDD for saving.

Word still has a very complex save routine which entails writing and
over-writing temp files in the target folder as it builds up the final file.
Flash drives and most other removable media just aren't up to the task.

Also, when you save to a folder, it becomes the 'active' folder for Word and
remains so until you redirect Word to a different folder. If the folder
happens to be REM media, if you pull the media it can really screw up Word.

Finally, many flash drives do not have an activity indicator and the users
pull the drive as soon as Word thinks it has finished saving, where in
reality, some data is still in memory being written to the flash drive
(which is still slow compared to the installed memory). Hence, the document
save is never completed.

Terry Farrell

"Gordon" <gbplinux@gmail.com.invalid> wrote in message
news:g0ja3k$bt0$1@news.mixmin.net...
> "Terry Farrell" <terryfarrell@msn.com> wrote in message
> news:8ADF9D7E-BF88-4671-BEA4-97A22F115BDD@microsoft.com...
>> Don't ever save to a flash drive or any other form of removable drive. It
>> is the easiest way to corrupt and lose your document. Always save to the
>> HDD and then COPY to the rem media.
>
> Why not? What's the difference between saving to a slave HDD and saving to
> a memory stick that's connected to the USB bus?
> I agree that in the old days of 1.44 MB floppy disks, that was a definite
> no no, but in this day and age of 1, 2, 4 or 8 GB memory sticks? I think
> technology has superceded that argument.