Suzanne
Mon Nov 17 08:34:25 CST 2003
Well, it does balance them; it just doesn't balance them according to your
definition of "balancing." <g> I really do think a table might better serve
your needs here.
--
Suzanne S. Barnhill
Microsoft MVP (Word)
Words into Type
Fairhope, Alabama USA
Word MVP FAQ site:
http://www.mvps.org/word
Email cannot be acknowledged; please post all follow-ups to the newsgroup so
all may benefit.
"Crazy man" <alcoNOSPAM@bigfoot.com> wrote in message
news:bpa260$8rc$1@sparta.btinternet.com...
> Thanks Suzanne, thought you would appear :-)
>
> Shame Word doesn't have option to balance rows / or columns!
>
> Phil
>
> "Suzanne S. Barnhill" <sbarnhill@mvps.org> wrote in message
> news:%23$58CSGrDHA.2692@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> > There's a Compatibility setting that might be relevant: Tools | Options
|
> > Compatibility: "Don't balance columns for continuous section starts."
Make
> > sure this isn't checked. If that isn't the problem, check on your
> paragraph
> > formatting to make sure that "Keep with next" or "Keep lines together"
are
> > not a factor (and of course ascertain that there are not any column
> breaks).
> >
> > But note that nothing you can do (short of inserting column breaks
> manually,
> > with Ctrl+Shift+Enter--and you will need them for *every* column) will
> give
> > the effect you want, since Word will always fill all columns as full as
> > possible. I would suggest that for the layout you're attempting, a
> 10-column
> > table would be more appropriate.
> >
> > --
> > Suzanne S. Barnhill
> > Microsoft MVP (Word)
> > Words into Type
> > Fairhope, Alabama USA
> > Word MVP FAQ site:
http://www.mvps.org/word
> > Email cannot be acknowledged; please post all follow-ups to the
newsgroup
> so
> > all may benefit.
> >
> > "Crazy man" <alcoNOSPAM@bigfoot.com> wrote in message
> > news:bp822g$hj9$1@hercules.btinternet.com...
> > > > Be sure non printing characters's (Ctrl + Shift + 8) are on and go
to
> > > > the ¶ to the right of the very last number: Select
> > > > Insert/Break/Continuous and that should even up your columns.
> > >
> > > No, same result, column 10 still empty!
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>