.net framework 2.0 Sp1

In cleaning up my programs I noticed that .net framework 2.0 Sp1 was taking
up 2700megs of space and I would like to know if it is safe to remove it or
is it a core program because I have ver 3.5 installed also

Patrick
Fri May 09 07:49:22 PDT 2008

"Ted Moes" <TedMoes@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:E77847A7-1BC9-4BD0-BFAD-8F51D3A4FCEE@microsoft.com...
> In cleaning up my programs I noticed that .net framework 2.0 Sp1 was
> taking
> up 2700megs of space and I would like to know if it is safe to remove it
> or
> is it a core program because I have ver 3.5 installed also

They are different things entirely and 3 does not replace 1, 1.1 or 2.x.

To give an example, this system (a Thinkpad) has a very handy
location-switching utility (Access Connections) that requires .NET v.2.
Version 1 and 3 are also present, but I ran into a problem that required
removal of v.2 and Access Connections wouldn't work till I reinstalled it.

So, no, you shouldn't remove it just because you have a later version.
The names are a bit misleading, as it was usual for later versions to
supercede earlier ones, but in this case they don't.

HTH
-pk

TedMoes
Fri May 09 08:04:01 PDT 2008

thnanks for the info

"Patrick Keenan" wrote:

> "Ted Moes" <TedMoes@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:E77847A7-1BC9-4BD0-BFAD-8F51D3A4FCEE@microsoft.com...
> > In cleaning up my programs I noticed that .net framework 2.0 Sp1 was
> > taking
> > up 2700megs of space and I would like to know if it is safe to remove it
> > or
> > is it a core program because I have ver 3.5 installed also
>
> They are different things entirely and 3 does not replace 1, 1.1 or 2.x.
>
> To give an example, this system (a Thinkpad) has a very handy
> location-switching utility (Access Connections) that requires .NET v.2.
> Version 1 and 3 are also present, but I ran into a problem that required
> removal of v.2 and Access Connections wouldn't work till I reinstalled it.
>
> So, no, you shouldn't remove it just because you have a later version.
> The names are a bit misleading, as it was usual for later versions to
> supercede earlier ones, but in this case they don't.
>
> HTH
> -pk
>
>
>

JS
Fri May 09 08:45:51 PDT 2008

One thing worth looking into is to check if you have the Developer (SDK)
editions installed as they consume much more disk space.

For the normal user, the disk space used for .NET 2.x is 66MB installed
size.
The download file is named NetFx20SP1_x86.exe (23.6MB)
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=79bc3b77-e02c-4ad3-aacf-a7633f706ba5&DisplayLang=en

For the developers .Net 2.x is identified by the letters 'SDK':
and is over 300MB when installed.
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=FE6F2099-B7B4-4F47-A244-C96D69C35DEC&displaylang=en

Note the difference in the file download size (354MB) vs (23.6MB)

JS

"Ted Moes" <TedMoes@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:E77847A7-1BC9-4BD0-BFAD-8F51D3A4FCEE@microsoft.com...
> In cleaning up my programs I noticed that .net framework 2.0 Sp1 was
> taking
> up 2700megs of space and I would like to know if it is safe to remove it
> or
> is it a core program because I have ver 3.5 installed also