Re: Microsoft .NET by Ken
Ken
Fri Jul 04 12:59:20 PDT 2008
On Fri, 4 Jul 2008 07:44:01 -0700, Lawson
<Lawson@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:
> Is it necessary to have Microsoft .NET framwork 1.1, 2.0, and 3.0? It seems
> a little redundant to me. Can the older versions be removed safely without
> any performance issues? Just wondering.
No. Some programs requiring the .net framework require specific
versions. It's best to keep them all. Besides, they use a tiny amount
of disk space.
--
Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP - Windows Desktop Experience
Please Reply to the Newsgroup