Question

I am thinking of creating an own net for the servers so that they listen among if, but in turn, some of these servers, they should
see the internal net for the users.

I have all the servers with two net cards:

NIC1: 10.0.100.x
NIC2: 172.16.0.x

My doubt.
Server1 with 10.0.100.11 / 172.16.0.11
Server2 with 10.0.100.12 / 172.16.0.12
Server3 with 10.0.100.13 / 172.16.0.13

If I throw a process - do we put a robocopy - from Server1 to Server2 and do I want that he goes for the net 172.16.0.x, as I make
it??,
do I need a router?, to configure the switch??, static routes???

Thank you and forgive the nuisances.

Meinolf
Fri May 02 05:58:15 PDT 2008

Hello Justo,

What will be the reason for making your live more complicated, instead of
using one network? PLease describe more in detail what you like to achive.

If the servers are also DC's, multihoming is a really bad decision, can/will
create a lot of problems.

Best regards

Meinolf Weber
Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers
no rights.
** Please do NOT email, only reply to Newsgroups
** HELP us help YOU!!! http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/mul_crss.htm

> I am thinking of creating an own net for the servers so that they
> listen among if, but in turn, some of these servers, they should see
> the internal net for the users.
>
> I have all the servers with two net cards:
>
> NIC1: 10.0.100.x
> NIC2: 172.16.0.x
> My doubt.
> Server1 with 10.0.100.11 / 172.16.0.11
> Server2 with 10.0.100.12 / 172.16.0.12
> Server3 with 10.0.100.13 / 172.16.0.13
> If I throw a process - do we put a robocopy - from Server1 to Server2
> and do I want that he goes for the net 172.16.0.x, as I make
>
> it??,
>
> do I need a router?, to configure the switch??, static routes???
>
> Thank you and forgive the nuisances.
>

Justo
Sat May 03 04:45:03 PDT 2008

Good morning

I need that some servers Windows 2003 ST / EE can carry out synchronization tasks, such as robocopy, replicacion SQL, replication
Lotus Dominos, etc. through a second NIC that not this in the range of LAN. These servers have 2 NICs, uan public for all the users
and another that is private and it is the one that I want to configure to carry out these works.

An example:

Server1 with 10.0.100.11 / 172.16.0.11
Server2 with 10.0.100.12 / 172.16.0.12
Server3 with 10.0.100.13 / 172.16.0.13

If I want to throw a robocopy from Server1 to Server2, I see it easy, since instead of putting a name NetBios I configure it for IP.
But and if I want to synchronize SQL from Server1 to Server2??, as I make it???

Not you if I explain to myself and excuse me for my English.
Thank you.


<Meinolf Weber> wrote in message news:ff16fb669838d8ca7a7c1590cac0@msnews.microsoft.com...
> Hello Justo,
>
> What will be the reason for making your live more complicated, instead of using one network? PLease describe more in detail what
> you like to achive.
>
> If the servers are also DC's, multihoming is a really bad decision, can/will create a lot of problems.
>
> Best regards
>
> Meinolf Weber
> Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
> ** Please do NOT email, only reply to Newsgroups
> ** HELP us help YOU!!! http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/mul_crss.htm
>
>> I am thinking of creating an own net for the servers so that they
>> listen among if, but in turn, some of these servers, they should see
>> the internal net for the users.
>>
>> I have all the servers with two net cards:
>>
>> NIC1: 10.0.100.x
>> NIC2: 172.16.0.x
>> My doubt.
>> Server1 with 10.0.100.11 / 172.16.0.11
>> Server2 with 10.0.100.12 / 172.16.0.12
>> Server3 with 10.0.100.13 / 172.16.0.13
>> If I throw a process - do we put a robocopy - from Server1 to Server2
>> and do I want that he goes for the net 172.16.0.x, as I make
>>
>> it??,
>>
>> do I need a router?, to configure the switch??, static routes???
>>
>> Thank you and forgive the nuisances.
>>
>
>

Ace
Sat May 03 17:37:26 PDT 2008

In news:%23wLbhMRrIHA.3420@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl,
Justo <justo@hotmail.com> typed:
> Good morning
>
> I need that some servers Windows 2003 ST / EE can carry out
> synchronization tasks, such as robocopy, replicacion SQL, replication
> Lotus Dominos, etc. through a second NIC that not this in the range
> of LAN. These servers have 2 NICs, uan public for all the users and
> another that is private and it is the one that I want to configure to
> carry out these works.
> An example:
>
> Server1 with 10.0.100.11 / 172.16.0.11
> Server2 with 10.0.100.12 / 172.16.0.12
> Server3 with 10.0.100.13 / 172.16.0.13
>
> If I want to throw a robocopy from Server1 to Server2, I see it easy,
> since instead of putting a name NetBios I configure it for IP. But
> and if I want to synchronize SQL from Server1 to Server2??, as I make
> it???
> Not you if I explain to myself and excuse me for my English.
> Thank you.
>
>

No problem about your English. Meinolf previously asked if these servers are
domain controllers. Are they? If so, using an extra non-teamed NIC on them
is inviting problems. If for non-domain controllers, setting up a separate
NIC will require some steps, one of which is to disable NetBIOS on the extra
NIC because it causes duplicate name errors. However SQL requires NetBIOS,
so this will cause a problem with SQL. I don't believe Lotus Dominos uses
NetBIOS, but I believe Robocopy does, that is depending on how you configure
Robocopy to communicate. I'm not even sure Lotus Dominos will allow you to
replicate a copy while the databases are in use.

Have you considered using Cluster Services? This sounds like your better
bet.

--
Regards,
Ace

This posting is provided "AS-IS" with no warranties or guarantees and
confers no rights.

Ace Fekay, MCSE 2003 & 2000, MCSA 2003 & 2000, MCSE+I, MCT,
MVP Microsoft MVP - Directory Services
Microsoft Certified Trainer

For urgent issues, you may want to contact Microsoft PSS directly. Please
check http://support.microsoft.com for regional support phone numbers.

Infinite Diversities in Infinite Combinations