Spywareblaster Update 1/28/07

Tutorials Win: Microsoft Windows Forum

- Previous
  - 1
    - Make Free Pc to Phone Calls..!! Make Free Unlimited Phone Calls Yes its true..International and national both. Free Calls to India too and other 50 countries.!! Check them at- http://freepctophonecalls.blogspot.com/ Tag: Spywareblaster Update 1/28/07 Tag: 293337
  - 2
    - test test Tag: Spywareblaster Update 1/28/07 Tag: 293313
  - 3
    - test test Tag: Spywareblaster Update 1/28/07 Tag: 293312
  - 4
    - upgrade?Nvidia AGP8x FX5200 etc.? I am using the GE Force4 MX440 and it works for email, YouTube, and the WinME MovieMaker program still handles our old Sony VX1000 camcorder. Occasionally I crank out small win9x swdev projects mainly with VC++4.0 (yeah, its ancient, like me). On the shelf are DevStudio 5(win98se) and VisualStudio6(NT4). Stuff on the shelf seems to rarely come off the shelf. I thought I should do a little housecleaning and I discovered I also have an unused Kaser FX5200 128 MB Nvidia graphic card. It's box says it has some nice nview Multi-Display capabilities and "TV-out support (NTSC/PAL) TV system". Will it support a decent flatscreen? This homebuilt is on a Gigabyte 7VT600P-RZC mob, 400 watt MGE psu(should I get a bigger PSU?), 1 GB DDR RAM(Should I add 1 or 2 GB RAM?). CPU is an Athlon XP 1066 MHz. HTH Oceanside Bob Tag: Spywareblaster Update 1/28/07 Tag: 293301
  - 5
    - SUPERAntiSpyware Professional & Windows Task Manager Hi folks! Does anyone know what the run line commands are for SUPERAntiSpyware Professional to use in Windows Task Manager? C:\PROGRA~1\SUPERA~1\SUPERA~2.EXE (+ what to make it run Quick Scan, Complete Scan and Custom Scan) Thanks in advance! -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com Tag: Spywareblaster Update 1/28/07 Tag: 293296
  - 6
    - SUPERAntiSpyware Professional & Windows Task Manager Hi folks! Does anyone know what the run line commands are for SUPERAntiSpyware Professional to use in Windows Task Manager? C:\PROGRA~1\SUPERA~1\SUPERA~2.EXE (+ what to make it run Quick Scan, Complete Scan and Custom Scan) Thanks in advance! -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com Tag: Spywareblaster Update 1/28/07 Tag: 293295
  - 7
    - SUPERAntiSpyware Professional & Windows Task Manager Hi folks! Does anyone know what the run line commands are for SUPERAntiSpyware Professional to use in Windows Task Manager? C:\PROGRA~1\SUPERA~1\SUPERA~2.EXE (+ what to make it run Quick Scan, Complete Scan and Custom Scan) Thanks in advance! -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com Tag: Spywareblaster Update 1/28/07 Tag: 293294
  - 8
    - WinMe Setup.exe I try to run the setup.exe from the cd ( files were copied from the hd to this cd) It checks drive C: and then the message comes on is "Insert Disk 1" and then click ok to continue or cancell to exit setup. Does it means this cd is no good at all? Any help would be appreciated? Tag: Spywareblaster Update 1/28/07 Tag: 293286
  - 9
    - zone alarm question I have ZA version 6.1.744.001. When I tried to update to more recent versions I experienced all sorts of problems. This version seems to work well, but I was wondering if there is some compelling reason to abandon it in favor of some other firewall. Any ideas? Tag: Spywareblaster Update 1/28/07 Tag: 293253
  - 10
    - annoying sounds in ME Hi, I have an older pc running ME. One day i was just exploring this unit and found a way to change the 'sounds' on it. I chose the 'animal' type sounds. But I just want to go back to defaults or other sounds of my choosing. I hate these monkey, tiger, jungle type sounds every time I click with my mouse somewhere for a command. ANy ideas? I am used to using my xp pc's and cant remember what I did with this one. NOTE* THis never bothered me before, but i unmuted my pc to listen to music and remembered that I still have these annoying sounds. THanks in advance Tag: Spywareblaster Update 1/28/07 Tag: 293250
  - 11
    - Runtime to Terminate I tried to install a freeware utility called BurnAwareFree version. Install process was ok. When I clicked the icon to run the program. The answer is bit funny. I never had it like this before. "Program C:\Windows\msiexec.exe. This application has requested the Runtime to terminate it in an unusual way". and it closes down. Any help would be appreciated? Tag: Spywareblaster Update 1/28/07 Tag: 293247
  - 12
    - SUPERAntiSpyware? Notwithstanding the prolonged scanning time for a complete scan (24.31 min. on my pc) and longer download time for updates, this program in overall performance is worthy of replacing Ad-Aware SE Personal for WinME, IMHO. I would appreciate other views or concurrence, for that matter. Harry. Tag: Spywareblaster Update 1/28/07 Tag: 293246
  - 13
    - Speed Up Your Computer By Cleaning Your Registry What is the registry? The registry is a database that stores information necessary to configure the system for your computers users, applications, and hardware devices. Why does it need to be cleaned (repaired)? Every time you install software on your computer, change a system setting, delete a program, all the changes are kept in the registry. Over time, your registry grows, however, it also can end up fragmented and full of unwanted registry items. These unwanted items occur by removing attributes of programs or deleting programs you no longer want without using the Add or Remove Programs function. Some programs do not always come with proper uninstall programs, so you are only able to delete a portion of the program. Or possibly you have moved a file, and now the program that used this file is unable to find it or it's an orphan file left over from an unsuccessful attempt to delete a program completely. In short, over time you end up with numerous misplaced files and objects which your computer can not process, this can slow your computer considerably, make start-up take forever and sometimes cause errors that will "crash" your computer.... Registry Repair: http://groups.google.com/group/regrepairsbv Tag: Spywareblaster Update 1/28/07 Tag: 293241
  - 14
    - Computer shuts down automatically. I don't understand this and I have no idea what is causing my computer to shut down while its in the process of loading Windows. to show more detail this how it goes: after the computer's bios runs it's test it then goes in to access the hard drive to load Windows but the usual loading Windows ME screen does not appear but now a black screen showing information about two driver's is displayed and at the bottom of the second one is a blinking cursor that blinks for a few seconds then the computer automatically shuts down. what could this possibly mean? please help. -- Ushnell Tag: Spywareblaster Update 1/28/07 Tag: 293240
  - 15
    - Windows Media Player-No Audio Windows Media Player for Windows Me I suddenly lost audio through Windows Media Player. It will not play my audio CDs. This is what I have done. I tried installing my Sound Blaster Live driver. It processed through until it stopped and sent this message: â??File Driver6.CAB on Windows Me edition is needed.â?? At this point I did not know what to do next and aborted the driver installation. I then went to the Dell troubleshooting diagnostics for audio and it told me to search for the following files: midi=mmsystem.dll wave=mmsystem.dll I did a search and the files were not listed. The Dell diagnostics told me to contact my manufacturer if the files were missing. So, can someone assist me what to do next? Thanks, Jerry Reeder Tag: Spywareblaster Update 1/28/07 Tag: 293230
  - 16
    - Reinstalling Windows Me It sounded like it was too easy!! Successfully reinstalled Windows Me this morning, subsequently taking several hours downloading all the updates. In the process of downloading required utilities, I ran into a memory problem which made no sense. However I have subsequently found out that previous partitions appear to have remained, although they are not recognized in MY COMPUTER. Background: This is a 10 GB Compaq Laptop which is shipped with the O/S on the C: drive and the Recovery System on D:. A couple of years ago, I had created a new partition to house all of my data files., OE Message store, tmp and temp. Currently, MY COMPUTER shows C: at 4.86 GB and D: at 2.72 GB, however SYSTEMS INFORMATION shows the following; 3 Partitions Size 9.37 GB Partition Disk#0 (Partition #0) Size 4.88 GB Partition Disk#0 (Partition #1) Size 2.73 GB Partition Disk #0 (Partition #2) Size 1.75 GB BootIt NG shows the following; MBR Entry 0 Partition 4997nMB FAT-32 Data Partition 1796 MB FAT-32 MBR Entry 1 Partition 2793 MB Extended System_S Volume 2793 MB FAT-32 I had thought I understood that the Compaq Recovery Discs would reformat my computer and restore to a Factory level. Obviously not so. I'm ready to start over but this time I need a little more guidance as to how to do it properly. Was I supposed to format C: and D: separately before starting? D0 I use the startup disk for this or should I use BootIt NG to format and wipe everything clean? I'm on my way out for the evening and will be busy tomorrow afternoon but will be ready to tackle this thereafter. Thanks Tag: Spywareblaster Update 1/28/07 Tag: 293222
  - 17
    - AdAware SE Personal Build I just read the tail end of the recent thread regarding AdAware SE and would appreciate if someone wouldn't mind taking a few minutes more and clarifying this for me. My version of AdAware is SE1R210.27.12.2007. Any time I check for updates I'm told that I am up to date. A visit to the Lavasoft website explains that support for this version expired December 31, 2007 but that I should replace it with AdAware 2007. The problem is that 2007 requires Windows 2000 or better. Mike has explained to Heather that Lavasoft has fixed the problem with the dated definitions and that she can download new definitions for AdAware SE from the Lavasoft site. I do indeed see where the DOWNLOAD button is on the webpage that Mike referenced but Lavasoft is still saying that they no longer support AdAware SE. So the question is, did Lavasoft simply fix the issues related to dated definitions or is AdAware SE now back with full support. Given that this 'puter operates with Windows Me, it would appear to me that either SE remains supported otherwise I must uninstall it because I won't be able to run AdAware 2007. Am I right or did I miss something? Dan Tag: Spywareblaster Update 1/28/07 Tag: 293206
  - 18
    - XP Installation Can I install XP over ME withoput deleting ME? If yes how is it done? Tag: Spywareblaster Update 1/28/07 Tag: 293189
  - 19
    - power-down stuck in "re-boot"... hello, trying to offer some long distance help to a friend who's running ME on a P3-450. He may have inadvertently caused this problem from a windows tweak, but his computer now does not do an auto shut-down from the "start" menu, as it did before, but simply re-boots. Is there is a windows tweak that could affect this, or is it more likely a BIOS problem? thanks for any suggestions... Paul Tag: Spywareblaster Update 1/28/07 Tag: 293151
  - 20
    - dll error message missing file Hi when i turn on my pc when it goes in to my desktop i am getting a error messagec:\windows\llfcdadll im just wondering if anybody can help me on finding the missing file it is saying that the file is missing so if somebody could help that would be great thanks lapointe420 Tag: Spywareblaster Update 1/28/07 Tag: 293143
  - 21
    - Right Click Menu Disappeared Experimenting with Ad-Aware, my right-click function for the desktop went 'out of order'. I can do without, but would like to restore it, if possible. The question is 'how'? My post in the IE browser ng hasn't found any takers yet. Harry. Tag: Spywareblaster Update 1/28/07 Tag: 293139
  - 22
    - msvcrt.dll missing I uninstalled some programs that I do not use anymore (not related to microsoft) and when I restarted the computer it says MSVCRT.DLL was not found. I did not receive a ME disk and not sure how to resotore this dll file so i can start Windows ME. Tag: Spywareblaster Update 1/28/07 Tag: 293117
  - 23
    - Religious Nutcase on the loose! I see that we have a religious nut on the loose. Posting under the name of others to proselytize and foist their religious beliefs onto others. I hope Microsoft clears the crap off the servers and bans them from posting here forever. John Tag: Spywareblaster Update 1/28/07 Tag: 293050
  - 24
    - Ad-Aware SE Personal 1.06R1 updates Greetings, Any one else notice a lag in the weekly updates of AdAware since Christmas? My last update was 12/27/2007.. Tks, RTS Tag: Spywareblaster Update 1/28/07 Tag: 293048
  - 25
    - System Restore has a CreateRestore option? I ask (again) because, IMHO, it doesn't make good sense for it not to and Andy Rathbone, in his books Windows Me for Dummies, describes System Restore as having a CreateRestore point as well as an option to select a prior creation. Our WinME computer, working pretty well for eight years now, has no such option or I sure as he!! can't find it.... Another peculiarity was, at first I could not get the Movie Maker to work with our Sony VX1000 camcorder. I got some support from MS which fixed that. And I found one of the Sony Blue Ray RW DVDs worked well with winME although Sony said it shouldn't. I think a lot of us have seen that kind of good news several times. Can someone tell me if my SystemRestore is "off" or is it just me? Tag: Spywareblaster Update 1/28/07 Tag: 293025
- Next
  - 1
    - Hotfixes and Updates for Me I have a six-year-old Dell with Windows Me that I would like to give to a friend or close acquaintance, but first I want to remove personal stuff like letters (no porn, nothing that shouldn't be seen by anybody, but of no business to others). I understand that the Format command will accomplish as much as I need, but Format will also remove the operating system (won't it?). I have all the CDs that came with this machine when I bought it new, so I ought to be able to restore Windows Me. But what about all the modifications that took place before MS stopped support for Me? Can I get the hotfixes, etc., that bring this computer up to the level it was when MS discontinued support? TIA. Ken Bland Tag: Spywareblaster Update 1/28/07 Tag: 293014
  - 2
    - New Computer, ME incompatable, XP is only upgrade In Microsofts great wisdom, they made the XP professional upgrade require windows already be installed. I have a new computer so it started without windows. Not knowing a way around the problem, I installed (or at least tried to) Windows ME. It halts due to a lack of compatable drivers. Restart it and it comes up without the CD (actually DVD) drive. Yes the drive works, its the one Windows ME was installed from. Now I have an extremely limited Windows ME with no way to access the XP professional disk. Anyone know of a work around? Tag: Spywareblaster Update 1/28/07 Tag: 293001
  - 3
    - Registry Defragmenters Hello: There have been a few threads recently on the use of registry cleaners. While some people like them and have not had any bad experiences with them, the consensus seems to be that such tools should be avoided by inexperienced users. I have also seen registry defragmenter utilities available, both as part of commercial software, as well as shareware and freeware. Does the advice to avoid registry cleaners also apply to registry defragmenters - that is to avoid them? Is it best simply to not touch the registry (other than using a tool like System Restore)? Thanks, O.J. Tag: Spywareblaster Update 1/28/07 Tag: 292985
  - 4
    - Service pack for ME I'm not sure I understand, if there are no service packs for ME ,how can I update my USB ports speed. This is what I was told I would need to do if I want this media player to work. Tag: Spywareblaster Update 1/28/07 Tag: 292969
  - 5
    - Help, my System Restore has no Create a Restore Point option..(NDE). Help, my WinME System Restore has no 'Create a Restore Point' option... I know this is incredibly late to notice but it is true. I see no option to (manually) create a Restore Point. I do get "automatic" creation of restore points usually once a day, occasionally twice, occasionally none. I thought that was a bit odd but it has "worked" for me so far. In thelast 3 months I have used Restore points 3 or 4 times to recover from odd ball system (Near Death Experience) behavior I finally got to checking Andy Rathbone's Microsoft Windows Me For DUMMIES, both volumes, and it is pretty clear that I should. In the first 5 or more years I've been using this computer I rarely if at all (deliberately) used it. Now I find it indispensable and I would like more control over the making and deleting of my Restore Points. Anybody heard of this problem? Is this fixable with just editing the registry? What is it's module name / cab file ? ?? Thank you very very much. Tag: Spywareblaster Update 1/28/07 Tag: 292952
  - 6
    - Problem reinstalling winME Is there something about installing winME that causes it to freeze exactly 10% in to the Copy Files portion of the install. Or is it my harddrive, and what should I do about it? I banged my IBM Thjnkpad 600E laptop really hard, and winME won't start anymore, but DOS will, from a rescue disk**. Whether I should have or not, I ran DOS scandisk for many hours, and until today, kept finding 1 or 2 or 8 clusters that scandisk disabled, although for the last few passes, they were just clusters that it thought ran slow and it expected to fail soon. During all of this, I used a recovery disk to start DOS, and on about 5 occasions then used a legitimate ME update CD to try to install ME. Everything went fine during the install until the middle of the Copy Files portion, and then every time, always at the 10% mark, TEN percent, the install freezes. The CD light goes off but the HD light stays on, without blinking at all, and I can even hear the sound of the hard drive, buzz for 2 seconds, silence for two seconds (three times) then silent for 5 seconds and start again. The buzz is more like a boozz. :) The only way to stop this is to turn off the computer. Other than running scandisk, which each time marks a few clusters not to be used, except this last time when it found none to complain about, i haven't used the laptop for anything, so maybe there is a bad spot on the HD that scandisk can't find??? and maybe the install gets to the same bad spot always somewhere in the 10% portion of copy files. Does that seem likely? Should I delete some files I can do without, so that there will be more good space, and then I might see it not freeze until 15 or 20%? but how can I make sure the OS stores files on this newly available space, instead of where it is storing them now? What can I do? **Wouldn't it be better in this situation if winME provided a method to start DOS without a rescue disk, straight from the hard drive? That's how win3.1, 95 and 98 worked. If you are inclined to email me for some reason, remove NOPSAM :-) Tag: Spywareblaster Update 1/28/07 Tag: 292942
  - 7
    - service pack 3 is there a service pack 3 for windows ME, I get that message when I try to plug in a MP4 video player. Tag: Spywareblaster Update 1/28/07 Tag: 292934
  - 8
    - My Control Panel is Missing and I can't Open Outlook Express When the old yr left so did my Control Panel. Also, I can't get in Outlook Express but rather am getting error messages. Help this novice please. GardenGranny Tag: Spywareblaster Update 1/28/07 Tag: 292932
  - 9
    - OT--ever heard of this???? http://axisaccess.com/?dl=1 Since this should work with Me, I'll post here. Has anyone ever heard of this or tried it?? One would probably have to have broadband to get it, but, to me, it is one of those 'too good to be true' things. Heirloom, old and very unsure Tag: Spywareblaster Update 1/28/07 Tag: 292922
  - 10
    - Windows 9x/98SE, Me Updates/Patches/Downloads I know Microsoft has removed the online support for Windows 95, 98, 98SE & ME. However, I have a ton of learning CDs for my 3-year-old and they are Windows 3.1 or Windows 95 only (some of them). So, I need to be able to get the patches/updates for Win95-WinMe somehow. Can anyone point me in the right direction? Thanks, Brian -- Brian Millikan Computer/Software Engineer Microsoft Control Applications (Dialog-Based) Specialist / Hardware Driver Development / User-Level Hardware Device Interfaces Tag: Spywareblaster Update 1/28/07 Tag: 292919
  - 11
    - Transformation of files At one time or another some data files in my documents folder were 'converted' from their 'original' status to individual JPEG and GIF images and JScript Files, which I would have to 'find an association for'. I am using FoxitReader and AdobeAcrobat 6 interchangeably, could that have caused it? If so, (or if not), what (other) remedy is there? Hoping for a miracle... Harry. Tag: Spywareblaster Update 1/28/07 Tag: 292917
  - 12
    - M'I-5 Persecutio n my r esponse to the harassmen t -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- -= my. response to the harassment -= -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- My first reaction in 1990/91 was. to assume that if I broke contact then they would not be able to follow and. would lose interest. So I did the things that have been suggested by other people;. I sold my television, stopped listening to the radio and tried to. withdraw away from the sources of abuse as much as possible. I reasoned that they must. have more important things to deal with and that normal people would simply leave me alone. if it were made difficult. for them to continue their harassment. I reckoned without the sheer vindictiveness of the abusers. They did. not let up but. instead "got to" people around me, mainly people at work, to do their dirty work for them. I went to see my GP, who refused to. believe what he was being told,. and refused to direct me on to anyone who could be of practical assistance. It was not until three years had passed that the. GP admitted the matter was outside his competence and. suggested going to the police. In. the summer of 1994 we called in counter-surveillance experts from a private detective agency to sweep our house and telephone. for bugging devices. They conducted a thorough search and. found nothing; but as noted above, since the existence of. surveillance was being forced in my face by the harassers, you would expect them to have taken the. possibility of a counter-surveillance sweep into. account when planning the type of devices to be. employed. In Easter 1995. I made a complaint to my local Police station in London, but the police have not expressed any. intention to do anything about the continuing harassment ("we're. not saying it's happening and we're not saying it isn't happening" were the words used).. I think the officer I spoke to at Easter wasn't aware of it happening,. although other members of the police. force obviously do know. From. April 1995 until the present time the matter has been discussed in a lot of. detail on the Usenet (Internet) "uk.misc" newsgroup. That discussion has given birth to the article which you are now reading.. My hopes in posting to Usenet were that wider. publicizing would discourage the security services from. continuing their harassment, and "draw people out" into concurring with the truth of what was being said. Neither of those. have followed, but the discussion has served a purpose in. allowing this structured report. to be created. 9162 Tag: Spywareblaster Update 1/28/07 Tag: 292916
  - 13
    - M,I.5,Pers ecution , p urpose in publici zing it; cens orship in u k.* news groups -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= -= purpose in publicizing it; censorship in uk.*. newsgroups -= -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= The postings to uk.misc newsgroup generated a very defensive reaction. from Usenet. readers in the UK. So much so, that they tried strenuously to suppress what was being said, both. by breaking the rules of netiquette in their responses on. the forum, and directly by action to revoke the account from which the. postings were issued. Yet the postings were within. the normal boundaries of behaviour for uk.misc, and other less partisan spectators did not. see justice in the censorship which was. effected, as the following excerpt shows; :Karen. Lofstrom (lofstrom@lava.net) wrote :>It does seem that the. frequency and the size of his posts are :>approaching net abuse. However,. IMHO, they aren't quite there yet. If :>his postmaster were to act. in this instance, it would raise troubling :>censorship. issues. The inescapable conclusion of the. censorship effected on the uk.* newsgroups is that the British are intent on. their wrongdoing remaining concealed, and therefore seek to. subvert and suppress freedom of speech, not only in their own country where the media shows xenophobic bias. and bile against all perceived enemies within and. without, but also in other countries. which have their own statutes to guarantee the basic human right of. free speech. It is absolutely necessary to bring their hate. campaign out into the open where it can be placed under scrutiny and the harassers seen for. what they are. That is the only way of making. it impossible for the security services to carry it out. There is a. wider dimension, though. Xenophobia as demonstrated by. British people and institutions over the last few years belongs to the same stable as racial hatred. In one case,. two youths on a Tube train. made that racism explicit by referring to their victim as a "soft toy, not up to British Standards".. Doubtless others victimize partly on the. basis of race (isn?t it odd that they chose to torment someone who is. not ethnically English?) while expressing their abuse in terms of another genetic attribute,. namely mental illness. All xenophobia on a genetic basis is wrong, but. while racial insults are illegal, abusing the mentally. ill is neither against the law nor subject to similar condemnation when it is. exposed. 6732 Tag: Spywareblaster Update 1/28/07 Tag: 292915
  - 14
    - M.I'5`Persecut ion - a buse in set-u p situatio ns and in publ ic -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- -=. abuse in set-up situations and in public -= -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Strangers in. the street have recognized me on sight many times, and shown awareness of the current thread of. abuse. To give you one example, in 1992 I was seriously ill, and a manager at work somewhat humorously said. that "it wasn't fair". that people were bullying me. A few days later, I attended for the first time a clinic in London as an outpatient,. and on my way out was accosted by someone. who asked if "they had paid my fare", with emphasis on the word "fare".. He repeated the word several times in this different context; that they should. have paid my "fare", each time emphasizing the word. For two. and a half years from the time their harassment started until November 1992 I refused to see a. psychiatrist, because I reasoned that I was not ill of my own action or. fault, but through the stress caused by harassment,. and that a lessening of the illness would have to be consequent to a removal of its immediate. cause, in other words a cessation of harassment. I also reasoned that since. they were taunting me with jokes about mental illness, if. I were to seek treatment then the abusers would think that. they had "won" and been proved "right". Remember, the constant theme of any. persecution is, "we must destroy you because you're X", whether X is a racial. or other attribute. In this case the X was "we persecute you because you have brain disease". The similarity. of this logic to Nazi attitudes to the. mentally ill is striking. The same manager who'd said "it wasn't fair". asked me in winter 1992 why I didn't seek help. from a psychiatrist; was it, he asked, because "they would think they had won" if I sought treatment?. That was something I'd never said at work.... again, taken separately it proves nothing, but many such things over a period of months proves. conclusively that people in the company knew what was going on, and. in quite a lot of detail. Usually. harassment in public lacks the level of finesse of "paying your fare". Most people's imagination does. not go beyond moronic parroting of the current term of denigration.. That is not surprising given the average level of the abusers; if they do. not have the intelligence to distinguish wrong from right then neither will they have the. capacity for anything other than mindless repetition of a monosyllabic. term calculated to fit into their. minds. The first incidents of verbal. assault in public were in again in the summer of 1990, although they increased in frequency and venom with time. In. July 1990. the first public incident occurred on a tube train on the Northern line. Two men and their girlfriends recognised me; the women. sprang to my defence, saying "He. looks perfectly normal, he doesn't look ill". Their boyfriends of course knew better, and followed the. party line; one of them made reference to an "operation", apparently to work. at the tube station but implicitly to a visit that I had made to hospital a couple of. weeks previously. In August 1990 going home from. college, soon after getting on a tube train at Gloucester Road I. was followed by a group of four youths, who started a chant. of abuse. That they were targeting me was confirmed by other people in the carriage, one of. whom asked the other "who are they going on at, is it the bloke who just got on?" to which the second. replied "yes, I think so". I. was tempted to reply, but as in every other instance the abusers are enabled in their cowardice by physically outnumbering the abused;. any confrontation would result in my being beaten up, followed. by a complaint to the police that "he. attacked us", and of course he's ill, so he must have been imagining that we. were getting at him. Shitty, aren't they? But the shittiness. of the four youths on the tube train is as nothing compared to the episode on the. National Express coach to Dover in the summer of 1992. While going on holiday to the. Continent I was verbally set upon by. a couple travelling sitting a few rows behind. The boy did the talking, his. female companion contributing only a continuous empty giggling noise. He. spoke loudly to ensure other people on the coach heard, always about "they" and "this bloke" but never naming either the abusers. or the person he was talking about. He said "they". had "found somebody from his school, and he was always really stressed at school".. They must have dug deep to find enemies there;. perhaps someone who dropped out of school, someone who didn't do too well later, who was jealous and. keen to get their own back? The boy also said "he was in a bed and breakfast. for only one night and they. got him". By a not unexpected coincidence I had been in a B&B in Oxford a week previously,. which had been booked from work; other things lead me to the conclusion that. the company's offices were bugged for most of the 2 1/2 years that I was there, so "they" would have known a. room in the B&B had been booked. (But I'll. bet "they" didn't tell the company's managers their offices were bugged, did. they?). After. a few minutes of this I went back to where they were sitting and asked where they were. travelling. The boy named a village in France, and the girl's giggling suddenly ceased;. presumably it permeated to her brain cell what. the purpose of the boy's abuse was. This and other set-up situations are obviously. calculated to provoke a direct confrontation which would. bring in the police, with the abusers claiming that they were the ones attacked. Again in 1992, outside. the house where I was living in Oxford I was physically attacked. by someone - not punched, just grabbed by the coat, with some verbals thrown in. for good measure. That was something the people at work shouldn't have. known about.... but soon after a couple of people were talking right in front of me about, "I heard he was. attacked". The UK police have a responsibility for preventing assault. occurring, but they do not seem to take any interest in meeting. that responsibility. I suppose their attitude is that harassment does not. come within their remit unless it involves physical assault, and they will. only become involved once that happens. That is of course quite the. wrong attitude for them to take, but as I now understand, the police investigate only the crime they wish to investigate;. if they do not take your complaints seriously then there is nothing you can. do to make them take. action. 4302 Tag: Spywareblaster Update 1/28/07 Tag: 292912
  - 15
    - M'I-5,Persec ution ' w hy won' t t he Briti sh polic e do t heir jo b an d p ut a st op to i t? -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- -= why won't. the British police do their job and put a stop to it? -= -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- The British police obviously do know what is. taking place. Besides my interpretations of what individual officers have said. which forces that conclusion, it. would be inconceivable for them to be unaware of something on this. scale. If they know,. then they will know that the abusers have broken laws in the UK and abroad. Recently. the UK introduced laws against electronic spying which carry a penalty of. several years jail if caught. If the police know illegal harassment is taking. place, and do nothing about it, then they are failing in their. responsibilities. Last Easter (1995) I went into the local police station. in London and spoke to an officer about the harassment against me. But. I couldn't provide tangible evidence; what people said, in many cases years. ago, is beyond proof, and without something to support my statements I cannot expect. a police officer to take the complaint. seriously. The current situation with regard to the police is not one. which allows a breakthrough in dealing with the problem. On the one hand, most. individual officers at a local police. station may not know about the ongoing assaults, so a complaint at that level will not yield results. Yet the police as. an organisation do know. of the harassment, and they must be aware that a complaint has. been made at a police station. So it is clearly their duty to take preventative action against the. continuing molestation, but because the criminals are operating on behalf. of a state agency, the police are not carrying out. their duty. 1872 Tag: Spywareblaster Update 1/28/07 Tag: 292911
  - 16
    - M I-5'Persecut ion ' why wo n't the Brit ish p olice do th eir job an d p ut a st op to i t? -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- -= why. won't the British police do their job and put a stop to it? -= -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- The British police. obviously do know what is taking place. Besides my interpretations of what individual officers have said. which forces that conclusion, it would be. inconceivable for them to be unaware of something on this. scale. If they know, then they will know that the. abusers have broken laws in the UK and abroad. Recently the UK introduced laws against electronic. spying which carry a penalty of. several years jail if caught. If the police know illegal harassment is taking place, and do nothing. about it, then they are failing in. their responsibilities. Last Easter (1995) I went. into the local police station in London and spoke to an. officer about the harassment against me. But I couldn't provide tangible evidence; what. people said, in many cases years ago, is beyond proof, and without. something to support my statements I cannot expect a police officer. to take the complaint seriously. The. current situation with regard to the police is not one which allows a breakthrough in dealing with the. problem. On the one hand, most individual officers. at a local police station may not know about the ongoing assaults, so a complaint at that level will not yield results.. Yet the police as an organisation do know of the harassment, and. they must be aware that a complaint has been made. at a police station. So it is clearly their duty to take preventative action against the. continuing molestation, but because the criminals are. operating on behalf of a state agency, the police are not carrying. out their duty. 1872 Tag: Spywareblaster Update 1/28/07 Tag: 292910
  - 17
    - M`I 5`Persecutio n - B ernard Le vin express es his v iews The. article of which part is reproduced below was penned by Bernard Levin for the Features section of the Times on 21 September. 1991. To my mind, it described the situation at the time and in particular a recent. meeting with a friend, during which. I for the first time admitted to someone other than my GP that I had been subjected to. a conspiracy of harassment over the previous year. and a half. >There is a madman running loose about London, called David Campbell;. I have >no reason to believe that he is violent, but he should certainly. be >approached with caution. You may know him by the. curious glitter in his >eyes and a persistent trembling of his hands; if that. does not suffice, you >will find him attempting to thrust no fewer. than 48 books into your arms, >all hardbacks, with a promise that, if you should return to the. same >meeting-place. next year, he will heave another 80 at you. > >If, by now, the police have arrived and are keeping a close. watch on him, >you may feel sufficiently emboldened to examine the books. The. jackets are >a model of uncluttered typography,. elegantly and simply laid out; there is >an unobtrusive colophon of a rising. sun, probably not picked at random. >Gaining confidence. - the lunatic is smiling by now, and the policemen, who >know about such things, have significantly removed their helmets. - you >could do worse than take the. jacket off the first book in the pile. The >only word possible to describe. the binding is sumptuous; real cloth in a >glorious shade. of dark green, with the title and author in black and gold >on. the spine. > >Look at it more closely; your eyes do not deceive you -. it truly does have >real top-bands and tail-bands, in yellow, and, for. good measure, a silk >marker ribbon in a lighter green. The. paper is cream-wove and acid-free, >and the book. is sewn, not glued. > >Throughout the encounter, I. should have mentioned, our loony has been >chattering away, although what he is trying to say. is almost impossible to >understand; after a time,. however, he becomes sufficiently coherent to make >clear that he is trying to sell the books. to you. Well, now, such quality >in bookmaking. today can only be for collectors' limited editions at a >fearsome price. - #30, #40, #50? > >No, no, he says, the glitter. more powerful than ever and the trembling of >his hands rapidly. spreading throughout his entire body; no, no - the books >are priced variously at #7, #8 or #9,. with the top price #12. > >At this, the policemen understandably put their helmets back on; one. of >them draws his truncheon and the other can. be heard summoning >reinforcements on his. walkie-talkie. The madman bursts into tears, and >swears it is all. true. > >And. it is. > >David Campbell has acquired the. entire rights to the whole of the >Everyman's Library, which died a lingering and. shameful death a decade or >so ago, and he proposes to. start it all over again - 48 volumes this >September and 80 more next year, in editions I. have described, at the >prices specified. He proposes to launch his amazing. venture simultaneously >in Britain and the United States,. with the massive firepower of Random >Century at his back. in this country, and the dashing cavalry of Knopf >across the water, and no one who loves literature. and courage will forbear >to. cheer. At the time this article was written I. had believed for some time that columnists. in the Times and other journalists had been making references to my situation. Nothing unusual about this you. may think, plenty of people have the same sort of ideas and obviously the papers. aren't writing about them, so why. should my beliefs not be as false as those of others? What makes this article so extraordinary is that three or. four days immediately. preceding its publication, I had a meeting with a friend, during the course of which we discussed. the media persecution, and in particular that by. Times columnists. It seemed to me, reading the article by Levin in Saturday?s paper, that he was. describing in some detail his "artist?s impression" of that. meeting. Most telling are the final sentences, when he writes, "The madman. bursts into tears, and swears it is all. true. And it is." Although I did not "burst into tears" (he seems to be using a bit of. poetic licence and exaggerating) I did try hard to convince my friend that it was all true;. and I am able to concur with Mr Levin, because, of. course, it is. At the beginning of the piece Levin reveals a. fear of being attacked by the "irrational" subject of his story, saying "I have. no reason to believe that he is violent, but he should certainly. be approached with caution". This goes back to the xenophobic propaganda of "defence". against a "threat" which was seen at the very beginning. of the harassment. The impression of a "madman running loose". who needs to be controlled through an agency which assigns to itself the mantle of the "police" is also one. which had been expressed. elsewhere. In the final paragraph of this extract,. his reference to Everyman?s Library as having "died a. lingering and shameful death a decade or so ago" shows clearly. what sort of conclusion they wish to their campaign. They want a permanent solution, and as. they are prevented from achieving that solution directly, they waste significant resources on methods which have. been repeatedly shown to be. ineffective for such a purpose. 1872 Tag: Spywareblaster Update 1/28/07 Tag: 292909
  - 18
    - M-I,5`Pe rsecution ` Berna rd Levin expre sses h is views The article of which part is reproduced below was. penned by Bernard Levin for the Features section of the. Times on 21 September 1991. To my mind, it described the situation at the time and. in particular a recent meeting with a friend, during which I for the first. time admitted to someone other than my GP that I had been. subjected to a conspiracy of harassment over the previous year. and a half. >There is a. madman running loose about London, called David Campbell; I have >no reason to believe. that he is violent, but he should certainly be >approached. with caution. You may know him by the curious glitter in his >eyes and a persistent trembling of his. hands; if that does not suffice, you >will find him attempting to. thrust no fewer than 48 books into your arms, >all hardbacks, with a. promise that, if you should return to the same >meeting-place next year, he will heave another. 80 at you. > >If, by now, the police have arrived and are keeping a close watch on. him, >you may. feel sufficiently emboldened to examine the books. The jackets are >a model of. uncluttered typography, elegantly and simply laid out; there is >an. unobtrusive colophon of a rising sun, probably not picked at random. >Gaining confidence - the lunatic is. smiling by now, and the policemen, who >know about such things, have. significantly removed their helmets - you >could do worse than take the jacket off. the first book in the pile. The >only word possible to describe the binding is sumptuous;. real cloth in a >glorious shade of dark green, with the title and author. in black and gold >on. the spine. > >Look at it more closely; your eyes do not deceive you - it truly. does have >real top-bands and tail-bands, in. yellow, and, for good measure, a silk >marker ribbon in a lighter green.. The paper is cream-wove and acid-free, >and the book. is sewn, not glued. > >Throughout the encounter, I should have mentioned, our loony has. been >chattering. away, although what he is trying to say is almost impossible to >understand; after a time, however, he becomes sufficiently coherent to. make >clear that he is trying. to sell the books to you. Well, now, such quality >in bookmaking today can only be for collectors' limited. editions at a >fearsome price - #30, #40,. #50? > >No, no, he says, the glitter more powerful than. ever and the trembling of >his hands rapidly spreading throughout his entire. body; no, no - the books >are priced variously at. #7, #8 or #9, with the top price #12. > >At this, the policemen. understandably put their helmets back on; one of >them draws his truncheon and the. other can be heard summoning >reinforcements on. his walkie-talkie. The madman bursts into tears, and >swears it is all. true. > >And. it is. > >David. Campbell has acquired the entire rights to the whole of the >Everyman's. Library, which died a lingering and shameful death a decade or >so ago, and he proposes to start it. all over again - 48 volumes this >September and 80 more next. year, in editions I have described, at the >prices specified.. He proposes to launch his amazing venture simultaneously >in Britain and the United States, with the massive firepower. of Random >Century at his back in this country, and. the dashing cavalry of Knopf >across. the water, and no one who loves literature and courage will forbear >to. cheer. At the. time this article was written I had believed for some time that columnists in the Times and other journalists had been making. references to my situation. Nothing. unusual about this you may think, plenty of people have the same sort of ideas. and obviously the papers aren't writing about them, so. why should my beliefs not be as false as those of others? What makes this article so extraordinary is that three. or four days immediately preceding its publication, I. had a meeting with a friend, during the course. of which we discussed the media persecution, and in particular that. by Times columnists. It seemed to me, reading the article by Levin in Saturday?s paper, that he was. describing in some detail his "artist?s impression". of that meeting. Most telling are the final sentences, when. he writes, "The madman bursts into tears, and swears it is all true. And. it is." Although I did not "burst into tears" (he seems to be using a bit of poetic licence and exaggerating) I did try. hard to convince my friend that it was all true; and I am. able to concur with Mr Levin, because, of. course, it is. At the beginning. of the piece Levin reveals a fear of being attacked by the "irrational" subject of his. story, saying "I have no reason to believe that he is violent, but. he should certainly be approached with caution". This goes back to the. xenophobic propaganda of "defence" against a "threat" which was seen at the very beginning of the harassment. The impression of. a "madman running loose" who needs to be controlled through an. agency which assigns to itself the. mantle of the "police" is also one which had been expressed. elsewhere. In the final. paragraph of this extract, his reference to Everyman?s Library as having "died a lingering and shameful death a. decade or so ago" shows clearly what sort of conclusion they wish to their. campaign. They want a permanent solution, and as they are prevented from. achieving that solution directly, they waste significant. resources on methods which have been repeatedly shown to be ineffective for such a. purpose. 6732 Tag: Spywareblaster Update 1/28/07 Tag: 292908
  - 19
    - M.I'5-Per secution ` who knows abou t it ? -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- -= who knows about it?. =- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Many people know, both in the establishment and media, and. among the general public. Despite an absence of its target from the UK for. more than two years, the. echoes of paranoia can still be heard loud and clear from across. the water. When it started in 1990, the only people who knew were those in BBC television who were spying. on my home, and a few radio broadcasters. There were a. few cases of public harassment, but very little compared to the situation that. developed a couple of years later. The list today includes BBC. TV staff (newsreaders such as Martyn Lewis, Michael Buerk, Nicholas Witchell), people. from radio stations such as Chris Tarrant of Capital and Radio 1 DJs, people in the print. media, but also many people in the general public.. All united in a conspiracy which breaks the laws which the UK does have regarding. harassment, and all completely uncaring for any semblance of. decency or elementary respect for individual. rights. The British police (obviously) do know the nature of the harassment. and in all probability the identity of those behind it. Some time ago I made. a complaint to my local police station in London, without. positive result. The UK police are failing in their duty to see the law. enforced in not checking. the abuse. 4302 Tag: Spywareblaster Update 1/28/07 Tag: 292907
  - 20
    - M-I 5`P ersecution . how and w hy di d it st art? -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- -= how and why did it. start? -= -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- The harassment didn't start by itself, so someone. must have been there at the outset to give it a firm push and set the "animals" after me. It. looks as if I was set up in June 1990, and the timing. indicates someone from university. was responsible. >One thing which has been missing from this discussion. is this simple >prognosis: that maybe he is. right and that, despite his admitted >mental condition, there really is a campaign against him organised. by >now-influential ex-students of. his university. In May or June 1990, Alan Freeman on Radio 1 read out a letter from. someone who. had known me for a few years, who wrote of the one who "wore out his welcome with random precision" (from the Pink Floyd song). Freeman went. on to say to the writer "that's a hell of. a letter you wrote there". The indication is strongly that people I had parted. from soon before nursed a grudge against me and were trying to. cause trouble for me. The suggestion is that Freeman might have shown the letter. to other people, and things could have snowballed from there. Right from the start. the real source (security services presumed). didn't announce themselves as the origin,. but let the "talkers", the radio DJs, believe that they were the originators. Think. about it; if you announce, "we're MI5 and we have a campaign against this bloke" then people might not go along. with it; but if you say, "everyone else. is getting at this bloke because he 'deserves' it" then people will join in with. fewer qualms. >Why would "they" wish to. assassinate your character? It's the classic case of hitting a. cripple to prove you're stronger. Why would the security. services expend hundreds of thousands of pounds and more than six years. of manpower to try to kill a British citizen? Because they are motivated by people who knew me at university. and feel personal animosity; because they. knew me to be emotionally weak, and it is in the nature of bullies to. prey on those known to be weak; and because they can rely on the complicity of the establishment,. which the security services manipulate and derive funding from. This. is England's biggest humiliation today,. and the British security services are intent on preventing their humiliation becoming reality by. continuing their campaign of attempted murder. to suppress the truth from becoming public. 1872 Tag: Spywareblaster Update 1/28/07 Tag: 292906
  - 21
    - M I`5'Persec ution , cos t of th e operation -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= -= MI5: cost of. the operation -= -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Here's what a couple of other people. on Usenet (uk.misc) had to say regarding the cost of running. such an operation... PO: >Have some sense, grow up and smell reality. What you are talking. about PO: >would take loads of planning, tens of thousands of. pounds and lots of PO: >people involved in the planning, execution. and maintenance of it. You PO: >must have a very high opinion of. yourself to think you are worth it. PM: >But why? And why you? Do. you realize how much it would cost to keep PM: >one person under. continuous surveillance for five years? Think about PM: >all the man/hours. Say they. _just_ allocated a two man team and a PM: >supervisor.. OK., Supervisor's salary, say, #30,000 a year. Two men, PM: >#20,000 a year each. But they'd need to work in shifts. -- so it would PM: >be. six men at #20,000 (which with on-costs would work out at more like PM: >#30,000 to the. employer.) PM:. > PM: >So, we're. talking #30,000 x 6. #180,000. plus say, #40,000 for the PM: >supervisor.. #220,000. Then you've got the hardware involved. And PM: >any transcription. that needs doing. You don't think the 'Big Boss' PM: >would listen to. hours and hours of tapes, do you. PM:. > PM: >So, all in all, you. couldn't actually do the job for much less than PM: >a quarter million a year. Over five years. What are you doing. that makes PM: >it worth. the while of the state to spend over one and a quarter million PM:. >on you? Those are. pretty much the sort of calculations that went through my head once I stopped to consider what it must be costing them to. run this operation. The. partial answer is, there have been periods when the intensity has been greater, and times when little has. happened. In fact, for much of 1993 and the first half of 1994, very. little happened. Although I don't think that was for reasons of. money - if they can tap into the taxpayer they're not going to be short of. resources, are they? The more complete answer is in the enormity of. what they're doing. Relative to the cost to British pride of seeing their country. humiliated for the persecution of their own citizens, isn't is worth the cost of four or. five people to try to bring. things to a close in the manner they would wish? To the government a million or. two is quite honestly nothing - if they can convince themselves of the necessity of. what they're doing, resources will not be the. limiting factor. 9162 Tag: Spywareblaster Update 1/28/07 Tag: 292905
  - 22
    - M,I.5 Pe rsecution Capital R adio - Chris Tarra nt -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-= -=. Capital Radio - Chris Tarrant -= -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-= Capital Radio DJs have been "in on it". from the start. One of the first things I heard in the summer of 1990 was from a Capital DJ who said,. "If he listens to Capital then he can't be all bad" (supportive, you see.. We're not bastards). Much of what came over the radio in 1990 is now so. far away the precise details. have been obliterated by time. No diary was kept of the details,. and although archives if they exist may give pointers, the ambiguity of what broadcasters said would leave that open. to re-interpretation. In spring 1994, Chris Tarrant on his. Capital morning show made an aside to someone else in the studio, about a person. he didn't identify. He said, "You. know this bloke? He says we're trying to kill him. We should be done for attempted. manslaughter". That mirrored something I had said. a day or two before. What Tarrant said was understood by the staff member in the studio he. was saying it to; they said, "Oh no, don't say that" to Tarrant.. If any archives exist of the morning show (probably unlikely) then it. could be found there; what he said was so out of context that he. would be very hard put to find an explanation. A couple of days later, someone at the. site where I was working repeated the remark although in a different way; they said there. had been people in a computer room when automatic fire extinguishers went off. and those people were. "thinking of suing for attempted manslaughter". Finally, this isn't confined. to the established radio stations. In 1990 after I had listened to a pirate radio. station in South London for about half an hour, there was an audible phone call in. the background, followed by total silence. for a few moments, then shrieks of laughter. "So what are we supposed to say now? Deadly torture? He's going to talk to us now,. isn't he?", which meant that they could hear what I would say in my. room. 6732 Tag: Spywareblaster Update 1/28/07 Tag: 292904
  - 23
    - M I-5 Pers ecution bugg ing an d counter-surveilla nce -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- -= MI5: bugging. and counter-surveillance -= -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- PO: >Did you ever look for the bugs in your house ? If not, why not. ? I mean if PO: >I thought. that was happening to me, I'd search the place from top to bottom, PO: >I mean I live there I would know if anything was out of place. If. I was PO: >really suspicious, I would. call in one of those bug detection teams which PO: >have those machines that pick up the transmitted radio waves.. This PO: >reminds. me of BUGS, that new programme on BBC1 on That's exactly what. we did. We went to a competent, professional detective agency in London, paid them over 400 quid to debug our. house. They used scanner devices which go to over 1 GHz and would pick. up any nearby transmitter in that range,. they also checked the phones and found nothing... but if the tap. was at the exchange, then they wouldn't find anything, would. they? CS: >Doesn't this suggest. to you that there are, in fact, no bugs to be found? You can. assume that they've done this sort of thing to other people in more "serious". cases, where they would know the targets would suspect the presence of electronic surveillance. So. they will have developed techniques and devices which. are not readily detectable either by visual inspection or by electronic means. What those techniques. might be, I couldn't guess. In this case,. the existence of bugging devices was clear from the beginning, and they "rubbed it in" with what was said. by the boy on the coach. It was almost as if they wanted counter-surveillance people to. be called in, who they. knew would fail to detect the bugging devices, causing loss of credibility. to the other things I would have to say relating to the harassment. I did. all the things someone in my situation would do to try to find the bugs. In addition to calling in. professional help using electronic counter-surveillance, I made a close visual inspection of. electrical equipment, plus any. points where audio or video surveillance devices might have. been concealed. Of course, I found nothing. Normal surveillance "mini-cameras" are. quite noticeable and require visible supporting circuitry. It seems to me the best place to put a. small video surveillance device would be additional to a piece of electronic equipment such. as a TV or video. It would be necessary. to physically break in to a property to fit such. a device. 4302 Tag: Spywareblaster Update 1/28/07 Tag: 292903
  - 24
    - M'I.5'Per secution ' th e BBC, televisio n a nd ra dio -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-= -= the. BBC, television and radio -= -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-= The first incident in June 1990 was when a BBC. newsreader made what seemed to be a reaction. to something which had happened in my home, and out of context of what they. were reading. My first reaction was disbelief; nothing of the sort had ever happened before,. the idea that such a thing could occur had not crossed my mind, yet. there was no doubt of what had just taken place. My disbelief eroded as this. recurred time after time. Besides the. news, offenders included shows such as Crimewatch (!), Newsnight, and "entertainment" shows. There seems to be very little. moral understanding among the people. who make these programmes; they just assume they will never. be caught, so they carry on without a thought for the illegality or amorality of what they do. The only time I ever heard a word. raised in doubt was by Paxman being interviewed by someone. else (I think by Clive Anderson) back in 1990; referring to the "watching". he said it troubled him, and. when asked by the host what you could do about it, replied "Well, you could just switch it. off" (meaning the surveillance monitor in the studio). He clearly didn't let his doubts stand in the way of. continued surreptitious. spying from his own or other people's shows, though. Now you're convinced this. is a troll, aren't you? This story has been the subject of much debate on the. uk.* Usenet newsgroups for over a year, and some readers believe. it to be an invention (it has even been suggested that a group of psychology. students are responsible!), others think it symptomatic of. a derangement of the author, and a few give it credence. Quite a few people do know. part or all of the story already, so this text will fill in the gaps in their knowledge. For the rest,. what may persuade you. of the third possibility is that some of the incidents detailed are checkable against any archives. of radio and TV programmes that exist; that the incidents involve. named people (even if those hiding in the shadows have not made their. identity or affiliations evident), and those people may be. persuaded to come out with the truth; and that the campaign of harassment is continuing today both in the. UK and on the American continent, in a none-too-secret fashion;. by its nature the significant risk of exposure increases with. time. On several occasions people said to. my face that harassment from the TV was happening. On the first day I worked in Oxford, I spent the evening in. the local pub with. the company's technical director Ian, and Phil, another employee. Ian made a few references to me and. said to Phil, as if in an aside, "Is he the bloke who's been on TV?" to which. Phil replied, "Yes, I think. so". I made a. number of efforts to find the bugs, without success; last year we employed professional counter-surveillance people to scan for bugs. (see later) again. without result. In autumn 1990 I disposed of my TV and watched virtually no television for the next three. years. But harassment from TV stations has gone. on for over six years and continues to this day. This is something that many. people obviously know is happening; yet the TV staff have the morality of paedophiles, that because. they're getting away with it they feel. no wrong. Other people who were involved. in the abuse in 1990 were DJs on BBC radio stations, notably disc jockeys from Radio 1 and other stations (see. the following section). Again,. since they don't have sense in the first place they can't be expect to have the moral sense not to be part of. criminal harassment. 1872 Tag: Spywareblaster Update 1/28/07 Tag: 292902
  - 25
    - Error on Kernell32.DLL Encountered the following error: *ANNCLIST has caused an error in Kernell32.DLL. Annclist will now close. If you continue to experience problems try restarting your computer.* Actions: I restarted the computer, same window appeared with the above notice. I also *restored to 12/26/07.* Same problem ocurred after system was restored. Problems ocurred when: I have noticed two instances when the above problem window shows up: 1) When the window appears to log on my password. 2) When running a thorough scan of Adaware SE - it gets stuck on 97,575 files and it does not get any further. Any advice will be appreciated. Running Win Me, IE 6 SP1 Tag: Spywareblaster Update 1/28/07 Tag: 292890

Alias

Top