Shane
Wed Jul 14 11:16:04 CDT 2004
"siljaline" <siljaline@invalid.com> wrote in message
news:OPhxmebaEHA.644@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> "Joan Archer" <archer_joan@NOSPAM.com> wrote:
> > Silj, Heirloom is having a lot of problems with it, don't know whether
you
> > have seen his post regarding the problems. I can't remember when he
first
> > posted but there is a thread in here "Re: Spyware Blaster 13/07/2004
> > 6:10PM
> > Joan
>
> Hi Joan,
> But Loom admits he's one of the few with problems, it would seem to me
> that under Win 9x Spyware Blaster installs and runs fine.
> I really wish I could get to the root of this, remind that a major thrust
of the
> earlier release was to solve Win 9x issues.
>
And just for the record, Silj, I don't bother uninstalling previous
versions. Don't with ZA either. No problems. I reckon Heirloom's problem is
due to hardware corrosion due to high levels of Sulphuric Acid in the
vicinity of his..........
btw haven't replied to the e-mail as it's on the other computer.
Basically, if once booted, if you d-click either C:\ERUNT\Regbckup.lnk or
C:\ERUNT\Run_ERU.bat, ERUNT should not run again (unless meanwhile midnight
has passed). If it's making just one backup per day it's working properly,
and if it isn't, it's not. On Monday the backup would saved to
C:\ERDNT\Monday - wherein will be the 'log' if it's working, but the 'log'
contains only the output of DATE /T for purposes of comparison. Maybe I
should call it %day%.dat. Yes, I think I will.
Thanks for testing this for me.
Shane