Mike
Sat Oct 07 03:01:38 CDT 2006
Interesting. I wonder then what triggered this update for both Ed and
yourself? I'd be tempted to say that MS had updated the detection
mechanism in some way (this has always been an unsatisfactory update) but
don't think that has been the case as the file dates appear the same as
they used to be. I say unsatisfactory as it doesn't replace all
vulnerable copies of gdiplus.dll but rather alerts the user that they need
to check. A useful tool, on any system, for this is gdiscan.exe. For
more details including a download link see
http://isc.sans.org/gdiscan.php
--
Mike
Mart <mart(NoSpam)@nospam.nospam> wrote:
> Oddly enough Mike, my 'relatively' clean and fairly recent (26 Nov
> 2005) installation of WinMe (definitely sans Office) fired this very
> same update, two days ago on 05 Oct 2006 too, via the Auto-update
> option. The WU history just shows it as "Automatic update"
>
> And I haven't (as far as I am aware) installed anything new for
> several months. The previous intermediate updates were the manual
> ones around 1st July 2006. I thought I covered all the earlier WinMe
> updates when I installed it back in November.
>
> In fact, I was just pleased to see that auto-update was still actually
> functioning despite the 'discontinuance of support' announcement.