Re: IPHLPAPI.DLL file cannot start by anonymous
anonymous
Mon Jan 12 16:52:41 CST 2004
Thank you, Joan! I went to get help from AOL and the tech
told me that it was a Windows problem. He also said that I
needed a new copy of IPHLPAPI to resolve this and gave me
the link to download a new copy etc...the instructions
said to download the new file to my desktop, backup the
old IPHLPAPI (I don't think I did this correctly - how is
this done?) and then copy the new file to the old
location. Windows won't let me replace the old file, which
goes back to what you said about not being able to replace
or copy the old file. GRRRRRR. So I guess what I'm trying
to ask is - do I bug Microsoft or AOL about this??
>-----Original Message-----
>Courtesy of MikeM.
>Joan
>
>For most folks this problem is caused by installing AOL9
since AOL 9 uses
>a
>different version of iphlpapi.dll than is included with
Win Me and fails
>to
>install it correctly. It appears that after over three
years AOL's
>programmers have yet to understand and appreciate the
benefits of system
>file
>protection whether it be in Win Me or perhaps even XP.
You can check this
>for
>yourself where you will find that AOL have put a version
of iphlpapi.dll
>in
>the Program Files/Common Files/AOL/ACS/winme folder which
differs from
>that in
>the windows\system folder.
>
>Since the copy of iphlpapi.dll in the windows\system
folder is protected
>from
>alteration or deletion by Win Me's System File Protection
(SFP) it cannot
>simply be replaced by the copy in the AOL folder. Whilst
there are ways
>of
>defeating SFP so that AOL's file can be added to the
system folder I
>personally feel this is a problem that needs to be
remedied by AOL. All
>they
>need to do is to supply the necessary certificate and the
version in the
>system folder can be replaced.
>
>You may want to consider using System Restore to solve
this problem by
>rolling back your system to before the problem started
and dumping AOL 9
>until
>AOL can get things working correctly (just don't hold
your breath)
>provided
>that that was not more than a few days ago.
>