Computer shuts down automatically.

Tutorials Win: Microsoft Windows Forum

- Previous
  - 1
    - Windows Media Player-No Audio Windows Media Player for Windows Me I suddenly lost audio through Windows Media Player. It will not play my audio CDs. This is what I have done. I tried installing my Sound Blaster Live driver. It processed through until it stopped and sent this message: â??File Driver6.CAB on Windows Me edition is needed.â?? At this point I did not know what to do next and aborted the driver installation. I then went to the Dell troubleshooting diagnostics for audio and it told me to search for the following files: midi=mmsystem.dll wave=mmsystem.dll I did a search and the files were not listed. The Dell diagnostics told me to contact my manufacturer if the files were missing. So, can someone assist me what to do next? Thanks, Jerry Reeder Tag: Computer shuts down automatically. Tag: 293230
  - 2
    - Reinstalling Windows Me It sounded like it was too easy!! Successfully reinstalled Windows Me this morning, subsequently taking several hours downloading all the updates. In the process of downloading required utilities, I ran into a memory problem which made no sense. However I have subsequently found out that previous partitions appear to have remained, although they are not recognized in MY COMPUTER. Background: This is a 10 GB Compaq Laptop which is shipped with the O/S on the C: drive and the Recovery System on D:. A couple of years ago, I had created a new partition to house all of my data files., OE Message store, tmp and temp. Currently, MY COMPUTER shows C: at 4.86 GB and D: at 2.72 GB, however SYSTEMS INFORMATION shows the following; 3 Partitions Size 9.37 GB Partition Disk#0 (Partition #0) Size 4.88 GB Partition Disk#0 (Partition #1) Size 2.73 GB Partition Disk #0 (Partition #2) Size 1.75 GB BootIt NG shows the following; MBR Entry 0 Partition 4997nMB FAT-32 Data Partition 1796 MB FAT-32 MBR Entry 1 Partition 2793 MB Extended System_S Volume 2793 MB FAT-32 I had thought I understood that the Compaq Recovery Discs would reformat my computer and restore to a Factory level. Obviously not so. I'm ready to start over but this time I need a little more guidance as to how to do it properly. Was I supposed to format C: and D: separately before starting? D0 I use the startup disk for this or should I use BootIt NG to format and wipe everything clean? I'm on my way out for the evening and will be busy tomorrow afternoon but will be ready to tackle this thereafter. Thanks Tag: Computer shuts down automatically. Tag: 293222
  - 3
    - AdAware SE Personal Build I just read the tail end of the recent thread regarding AdAware SE and would appreciate if someone wouldn't mind taking a few minutes more and clarifying this for me. My version of AdAware is SE1R210.27.12.2007. Any time I check for updates I'm told that I am up to date. A visit to the Lavasoft website explains that support for this version expired December 31, 2007 but that I should replace it with AdAware 2007. The problem is that 2007 requires Windows 2000 or better. Mike has explained to Heather that Lavasoft has fixed the problem with the dated definitions and that she can download new definitions for AdAware SE from the Lavasoft site. I do indeed see where the DOWNLOAD button is on the webpage that Mike referenced but Lavasoft is still saying that they no longer support AdAware SE. So the question is, did Lavasoft simply fix the issues related to dated definitions or is AdAware SE now back with full support. Given that this 'puter operates with Windows Me, it would appear to me that either SE remains supported otherwise I must uninstall it because I won't be able to run AdAware 2007. Am I right or did I miss something? Dan Tag: Computer shuts down automatically. Tag: 293206
  - 4
    - XP Installation Can I install XP over ME withoput deleting ME? If yes how is it done? Tag: Computer shuts down automatically. Tag: 293189
  - 5
    - power-down stuck in "re-boot"... hello, trying to offer some long distance help to a friend who's running ME on a P3-450. He may have inadvertently caused this problem from a windows tweak, but his computer now does not do an auto shut-down from the "start" menu, as it did before, but simply re-boots. Is there is a windows tweak that could affect this, or is it more likely a BIOS problem? thanks for any suggestions... Paul Tag: Computer shuts down automatically. Tag: 293151
  - 6
    - dll error message missing file Hi when i turn on my pc when it goes in to my desktop i am getting a error messagec:\windows\llfcdadll im just wondering if anybody can help me on finding the missing file it is saying that the file is missing so if somebody could help that would be great thanks lapointe420 Tag: Computer shuts down automatically. Tag: 293143
  - 7
    - Right Click Menu Disappeared Experimenting with Ad-Aware, my right-click function for the desktop went 'out of order'. I can do without, but would like to restore it, if possible. The question is 'how'? My post in the IE browser ng hasn't found any takers yet. Harry. Tag: Computer shuts down automatically. Tag: 293139
  - 8
    - msvcrt.dll missing I uninstalled some programs that I do not use anymore (not related to microsoft) and when I restarted the computer it says MSVCRT.DLL was not found. I did not receive a ME disk and not sure how to resotore this dll file so i can start Windows ME. Tag: Computer shuts down automatically. Tag: 293117
  - 9
    - Religious Nutcase on the loose! I see that we have a religious nut on the loose. Posting under the name of others to proselytize and foist their religious beliefs onto others. I hope Microsoft clears the crap off the servers and bans them from posting here forever. John Tag: Computer shuts down automatically. Tag: 293050
  - 10
    - Ad-Aware SE Personal 1.06R1 updates Greetings, Any one else notice a lag in the weekly updates of AdAware since Christmas? My last update was 12/27/2007.. Tks, RTS Tag: Computer shuts down automatically. Tag: 293048
  - 11
    - System Restore has a CreateRestore option? I ask (again) because, IMHO, it doesn't make good sense for it not to and Andy Rathbone, in his books Windows Me for Dummies, describes System Restore as having a CreateRestore point as well as an option to select a prior creation. Our WinME computer, working pretty well for eight years now, has no such option or I sure as he!! can't find it.... Another peculiarity was, at first I could not get the Movie Maker to work with our Sony VX1000 camcorder. I got some support from MS which fixed that. And I found one of the Sony Blue Ray RW DVDs worked well with winME although Sony said it shouldn't. I think a lot of us have seen that kind of good news several times. Can someone tell me if my SystemRestore is "off" or is it just me? Tag: Computer shuts down automatically. Tag: 293025
  - 12
    - Hotfixes and Updates for Me I have a six-year-old Dell with Windows Me that I would like to give to a friend or close acquaintance, but first I want to remove personal stuff like letters (no porn, nothing that shouldn't be seen by anybody, but of no business to others). I understand that the Format command will accomplish as much as I need, but Format will also remove the operating system (won't it?). I have all the CDs that came with this machine when I bought it new, so I ought to be able to restore Windows Me. But what about all the modifications that took place before MS stopped support for Me? Can I get the hotfixes, etc., that bring this computer up to the level it was when MS discontinued support? TIA. Ken Bland Tag: Computer shuts down automatically. Tag: 293014
  - 13
    - New Computer, ME incompatable, XP is only upgrade In Microsofts great wisdom, they made the XP professional upgrade require windows already be installed. I have a new computer so it started without windows. Not knowing a way around the problem, I installed (or at least tried to) Windows ME. It halts due to a lack of compatable drivers. Restart it and it comes up without the CD (actually DVD) drive. Yes the drive works, its the one Windows ME was installed from. Now I have an extremely limited Windows ME with no way to access the XP professional disk. Anyone know of a work around? Tag: Computer shuts down automatically. Tag: 293001
  - 14
    - Registry Defragmenters Hello: There have been a few threads recently on the use of registry cleaners. While some people like them and have not had any bad experiences with them, the consensus seems to be that such tools should be avoided by inexperienced users. I have also seen registry defragmenter utilities available, both as part of commercial software, as well as shareware and freeware. Does the advice to avoid registry cleaners also apply to registry defragmenters - that is to avoid them? Is it best simply to not touch the registry (other than using a tool like System Restore)? Thanks, O.J. Tag: Computer shuts down automatically. Tag: 292985
  - 15
    - Service pack for ME I'm not sure I understand, if there are no service packs for ME ,how can I update my USB ports speed. This is what I was told I would need to do if I want this media player to work. Tag: Computer shuts down automatically. Tag: 292969
  - 16
    - Help, my System Restore has no Create a Restore Point option..(NDE). Help, my WinME System Restore has no 'Create a Restore Point' option... I know this is incredibly late to notice but it is true. I see no option to (manually) create a Restore Point. I do get "automatic" creation of restore points usually once a day, occasionally twice, occasionally none. I thought that was a bit odd but it has "worked" for me so far. In thelast 3 months I have used Restore points 3 or 4 times to recover from odd ball system (Near Death Experience) behavior I finally got to checking Andy Rathbone's Microsoft Windows Me For DUMMIES, both volumes, and it is pretty clear that I should. In the first 5 or more years I've been using this computer I rarely if at all (deliberately) used it. Now I find it indispensable and I would like more control over the making and deleting of my Restore Points. Anybody heard of this problem? Is this fixable with just editing the registry? What is it's module name / cab file ? ?? Thank you very very much. Tag: Computer shuts down automatically. Tag: 292952
  - 17
    - Problem reinstalling winME Is there something about installing winME that causes it to freeze exactly 10% in to the Copy Files portion of the install. Or is it my harddrive, and what should I do about it? I banged my IBM Thjnkpad 600E laptop really hard, and winME won't start anymore, but DOS will, from a rescue disk**. Whether I should have or not, I ran DOS scandisk for many hours, and until today, kept finding 1 or 2 or 8 clusters that scandisk disabled, although for the last few passes, they were just clusters that it thought ran slow and it expected to fail soon. During all of this, I used a recovery disk to start DOS, and on about 5 occasions then used a legitimate ME update CD to try to install ME. Everything went fine during the install until the middle of the Copy Files portion, and then every time, always at the 10% mark, TEN percent, the install freezes. The CD light goes off but the HD light stays on, without blinking at all, and I can even hear the sound of the hard drive, buzz for 2 seconds, silence for two seconds (three times) then silent for 5 seconds and start again. The buzz is more like a boozz. :) The only way to stop this is to turn off the computer. Other than running scandisk, which each time marks a few clusters not to be used, except this last time when it found none to complain about, i haven't used the laptop for anything, so maybe there is a bad spot on the HD that scandisk can't find??? and maybe the install gets to the same bad spot always somewhere in the 10% portion of copy files. Does that seem likely? Should I delete some files I can do without, so that there will be more good space, and then I might see it not freeze until 15 or 20%? but how can I make sure the OS stores files on this newly available space, instead of where it is storing them now? What can I do? **Wouldn't it be better in this situation if winME provided a method to start DOS without a rescue disk, straight from the hard drive? That's how win3.1, 95 and 98 worked. If you are inclined to email me for some reason, remove NOPSAM :-) Tag: Computer shuts down automatically. Tag: 292942
  - 18
    - service pack 3 is there a service pack 3 for windows ME, I get that message when I try to plug in a MP4 video player. Tag: Computer shuts down automatically. Tag: 292934
  - 19
    - My Control Panel is Missing and I can't Open Outlook Express When the old yr left so did my Control Panel. Also, I can't get in Outlook Express but rather am getting error messages. Help this novice please. GardenGranny Tag: Computer shuts down automatically. Tag: 292932
  - 20
    - OT--ever heard of this???? http://axisaccess.com/?dl=1 Since this should work with Me, I'll post here. Has anyone ever heard of this or tried it?? One would probably have to have broadband to get it, but, to me, it is one of those 'too good to be true' things. Heirloom, old and very unsure Tag: Computer shuts down automatically. Tag: 292922
  - 21
    - Windows 9x/98SE, Me Updates/Patches/Downloads I know Microsoft has removed the online support for Windows 95, 98, 98SE & ME. However, I have a ton of learning CDs for my 3-year-old and they are Windows 3.1 or Windows 95 only (some of them). So, I need to be able to get the patches/updates for Win95-WinMe somehow. Can anyone point me in the right direction? Thanks, Brian -- Brian Millikan Computer/Software Engineer Microsoft Control Applications (Dialog-Based) Specialist / Hardware Driver Development / User-Level Hardware Device Interfaces Tag: Computer shuts down automatically. Tag: 292919
  - 22
    - Transformation of files At one time or another some data files in my documents folder were 'converted' from their 'original' status to individual JPEG and GIF images and JScript Files, which I would have to 'find an association for'. I am using FoxitReader and AdobeAcrobat 6 interchangeably, could that have caused it? If so, (or if not), what (other) remedy is there? Hoping for a miracle... Harry. Tag: Computer shuts down automatically. Tag: 292917
  - 23
    - M'I-5 Persecutio n my r esponse to the harassmen t -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- -= my. response to the harassment -= -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- My first reaction in 1990/91 was. to assume that if I broke contact then they would not be able to follow and. would lose interest. So I did the things that have been suggested by other people;. I sold my television, stopped listening to the radio and tried to. withdraw away from the sources of abuse as much as possible. I reasoned that they must. have more important things to deal with and that normal people would simply leave me alone. if it were made difficult. for them to continue their harassment. I reckoned without the sheer vindictiveness of the abusers. They did. not let up but. instead "got to" people around me, mainly people at work, to do their dirty work for them. I went to see my GP, who refused to. believe what he was being told,. and refused to direct me on to anyone who could be of practical assistance. It was not until three years had passed that the. GP admitted the matter was outside his competence and. suggested going to the police. In. the summer of 1994 we called in counter-surveillance experts from a private detective agency to sweep our house and telephone. for bugging devices. They conducted a thorough search and. found nothing; but as noted above, since the existence of. surveillance was being forced in my face by the harassers, you would expect them to have taken the. possibility of a counter-surveillance sweep into. account when planning the type of devices to be. employed. In Easter 1995. I made a complaint to my local Police station in London, but the police have not expressed any. intention to do anything about the continuing harassment ("we're. not saying it's happening and we're not saying it isn't happening" were the words used).. I think the officer I spoke to at Easter wasn't aware of it happening,. although other members of the police. force obviously do know. From. April 1995 until the present time the matter has been discussed in a lot of. detail on the Usenet (Internet) "uk.misc" newsgroup. That discussion has given birth to the article which you are now reading.. My hopes in posting to Usenet were that wider. publicizing would discourage the security services from. continuing their harassment, and "draw people out" into concurring with the truth of what was being said. Neither of those. have followed, but the discussion has served a purpose in. allowing this structured report. to be created. 9162 Tag: Computer shuts down automatically. Tag: 292916
  - 24
    - M,I.5,Pers ecution , p urpose in publici zing it; cens orship in u k.* news groups -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= -= purpose in publicizing it; censorship in uk.*. newsgroups -= -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= The postings to uk.misc newsgroup generated a very defensive reaction. from Usenet. readers in the UK. So much so, that they tried strenuously to suppress what was being said, both. by breaking the rules of netiquette in their responses on. the forum, and directly by action to revoke the account from which the. postings were issued. Yet the postings were within. the normal boundaries of behaviour for uk.misc, and other less partisan spectators did not. see justice in the censorship which was. effected, as the following excerpt shows; :Karen. Lofstrom (lofstrom@lava.net) wrote :>It does seem that the. frequency and the size of his posts are :>approaching net abuse. However,. IMHO, they aren't quite there yet. If :>his postmaster were to act. in this instance, it would raise troubling :>censorship. issues. The inescapable conclusion of the. censorship effected on the uk.* newsgroups is that the British are intent on. their wrongdoing remaining concealed, and therefore seek to. subvert and suppress freedom of speech, not only in their own country where the media shows xenophobic bias. and bile against all perceived enemies within and. without, but also in other countries. which have their own statutes to guarantee the basic human right of. free speech. It is absolutely necessary to bring their hate. campaign out into the open where it can be placed under scrutiny and the harassers seen for. what they are. That is the only way of making. it impossible for the security services to carry it out. There is a. wider dimension, though. Xenophobia as demonstrated by. British people and institutions over the last few years belongs to the same stable as racial hatred. In one case,. two youths on a Tube train. made that racism explicit by referring to their victim as a "soft toy, not up to British Standards".. Doubtless others victimize partly on the. basis of race (isn?t it odd that they chose to torment someone who is. not ethnically English?) while expressing their abuse in terms of another genetic attribute,. namely mental illness. All xenophobia on a genetic basis is wrong, but. while racial insults are illegal, abusing the mentally. ill is neither against the law nor subject to similar condemnation when it is. exposed. 6732 Tag: Computer shuts down automatically. Tag: 292915
  - 25
    - M.I'5`Persecut ion - a buse in set-u p situatio ns and in publ ic -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- -=. abuse in set-up situations and in public -= -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Strangers in. the street have recognized me on sight many times, and shown awareness of the current thread of. abuse. To give you one example, in 1992 I was seriously ill, and a manager at work somewhat humorously said. that "it wasn't fair". that people were bullying me. A few days later, I attended for the first time a clinic in London as an outpatient,. and on my way out was accosted by someone. who asked if "they had paid my fare", with emphasis on the word "fare".. He repeated the word several times in this different context; that they should. have paid my "fare", each time emphasizing the word. For two. and a half years from the time their harassment started until November 1992 I refused to see a. psychiatrist, because I reasoned that I was not ill of my own action or. fault, but through the stress caused by harassment,. and that a lessening of the illness would have to be consequent to a removal of its immediate. cause, in other words a cessation of harassment. I also reasoned that since. they were taunting me with jokes about mental illness, if. I were to seek treatment then the abusers would think that. they had "won" and been proved "right". Remember, the constant theme of any. persecution is, "we must destroy you because you're X", whether X is a racial. or other attribute. In this case the X was "we persecute you because you have brain disease". The similarity. of this logic to Nazi attitudes to the. mentally ill is striking. The same manager who'd said "it wasn't fair". asked me in winter 1992 why I didn't seek help. from a psychiatrist; was it, he asked, because "they would think they had won" if I sought treatment?. That was something I'd never said at work.... again, taken separately it proves nothing, but many such things over a period of months proves. conclusively that people in the company knew what was going on, and. in quite a lot of detail. Usually. harassment in public lacks the level of finesse of "paying your fare". Most people's imagination does. not go beyond moronic parroting of the current term of denigration.. That is not surprising given the average level of the abusers; if they do. not have the intelligence to distinguish wrong from right then neither will they have the. capacity for anything other than mindless repetition of a monosyllabic. term calculated to fit into their. minds. The first incidents of verbal. assault in public were in again in the summer of 1990, although they increased in frequency and venom with time. In. July 1990. the first public incident occurred on a tube train on the Northern line. Two men and their girlfriends recognised me; the women. sprang to my defence, saying "He. looks perfectly normal, he doesn't look ill". Their boyfriends of course knew better, and followed the. party line; one of them made reference to an "operation", apparently to work. at the tube station but implicitly to a visit that I had made to hospital a couple of. weeks previously. In August 1990 going home from. college, soon after getting on a tube train at Gloucester Road I. was followed by a group of four youths, who started a chant. of abuse. That they were targeting me was confirmed by other people in the carriage, one of. whom asked the other "who are they going on at, is it the bloke who just got on?" to which the second. replied "yes, I think so". I. was tempted to reply, but as in every other instance the abusers are enabled in their cowardice by physically outnumbering the abused;. any confrontation would result in my being beaten up, followed. by a complaint to the police that "he. attacked us", and of course he's ill, so he must have been imagining that we. were getting at him. Shitty, aren't they? But the shittiness. of the four youths on the tube train is as nothing compared to the episode on the. National Express coach to Dover in the summer of 1992. While going on holiday to the. Continent I was verbally set upon by. a couple travelling sitting a few rows behind. The boy did the talking, his. female companion contributing only a continuous empty giggling noise. He. spoke loudly to ensure other people on the coach heard, always about "they" and "this bloke" but never naming either the abusers. or the person he was talking about. He said "they". had "found somebody from his school, and he was always really stressed at school".. They must have dug deep to find enemies there;. perhaps someone who dropped out of school, someone who didn't do too well later, who was jealous and. keen to get their own back? The boy also said "he was in a bed and breakfast. for only one night and they. got him". By a not unexpected coincidence I had been in a B&B in Oxford a week previously,. which had been booked from work; other things lead me to the conclusion that. the company's offices were bugged for most of the 2 1/2 years that I was there, so "they" would have known a. room in the B&B had been booked. (But I'll. bet "they" didn't tell the company's managers their offices were bugged, did. they?). After. a few minutes of this I went back to where they were sitting and asked where they were. travelling. The boy named a village in France, and the girl's giggling suddenly ceased;. presumably it permeated to her brain cell what. the purpose of the boy's abuse was. This and other set-up situations are obviously. calculated to provoke a direct confrontation which would. bring in the police, with the abusers claiming that they were the ones attacked. Again in 1992, outside. the house where I was living in Oxford I was physically attacked. by someone - not punched, just grabbed by the coat, with some verbals thrown in. for good measure. That was something the people at work shouldn't have. known about.... but soon after a couple of people were talking right in front of me about, "I heard he was. attacked". The UK police have a responsibility for preventing assault. occurring, but they do not seem to take any interest in meeting. that responsibility. I suppose their attitude is that harassment does not. come within their remit unless it involves physical assault, and they will. only become involved once that happens. That is of course quite the. wrong attitude for them to take, but as I now understand, the police investigate only the crime they wish to investigate;. if they do not take your complaints seriously then there is nothing you can. do to make them take. action. 4302 Tag: Computer shuts down automatically. Tag: 292912
- Next
  - 1
    - M'I-5,Persec ution ' w hy won' t t he Briti sh polic e do t heir jo b an d p ut a st op to i t? -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- -= why won't. the British police do their job and put a stop to it? -= -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- The British police obviously do know what is. taking place. Besides my interpretations of what individual officers have said. which forces that conclusion, it. would be inconceivable for them to be unaware of something on this. scale. If they know,. then they will know that the abusers have broken laws in the UK and abroad. Recently. the UK introduced laws against electronic spying which carry a penalty of. several years jail if caught. If the police know illegal harassment is taking. place, and do nothing about it, then they are failing in their. responsibilities. Last Easter (1995) I went into the local police station. in London and spoke to an officer about the harassment against me. But. I couldn't provide tangible evidence; what people said, in many cases years. ago, is beyond proof, and without something to support my statements I cannot expect. a police officer to take the complaint. seriously. The current situation with regard to the police is not one. which allows a breakthrough in dealing with the problem. On the one hand, most. individual officers at a local police. station may not know about the ongoing assaults, so a complaint at that level will not yield results. Yet the police as. an organisation do know. of the harassment, and they must be aware that a complaint has. been made at a police station. So it is clearly their duty to take preventative action against the. continuing molestation, but because the criminals are operating on behalf. of a state agency, the police are not carrying out. their duty. 1872 Tag: Computer shuts down automatically. Tag: 292911
  - 2
    - M I-5'Persecut ion ' why wo n't the Brit ish p olice do th eir job an d p ut a st op to i t? -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- -= why. won't the British police do their job and put a stop to it? -= -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- The British police. obviously do know what is taking place. Besides my interpretations of what individual officers have said. which forces that conclusion, it would be. inconceivable for them to be unaware of something on this. scale. If they know, then they will know that the. abusers have broken laws in the UK and abroad. Recently the UK introduced laws against electronic. spying which carry a penalty of. several years jail if caught. If the police know illegal harassment is taking place, and do nothing. about it, then they are failing in. their responsibilities. Last Easter (1995) I went. into the local police station in London and spoke to an. officer about the harassment against me. But I couldn't provide tangible evidence; what. people said, in many cases years ago, is beyond proof, and without. something to support my statements I cannot expect a police officer. to take the complaint seriously. The. current situation with regard to the police is not one which allows a breakthrough in dealing with the. problem. On the one hand, most individual officers. at a local police station may not know about the ongoing assaults, so a complaint at that level will not yield results.. Yet the police as an organisation do know of the harassment, and. they must be aware that a complaint has been made. at a police station. So it is clearly their duty to take preventative action against the. continuing molestation, but because the criminals are. operating on behalf of a state agency, the police are not carrying. out their duty. 1872 Tag: Computer shuts down automatically. Tag: 292910
  - 3
    - M`I 5`Persecutio n - B ernard Le vin express es his v iews The. article of which part is reproduced below was penned by Bernard Levin for the Features section of the Times on 21 September. 1991. To my mind, it described the situation at the time and in particular a recent. meeting with a friend, during which. I for the first time admitted to someone other than my GP that I had been subjected to. a conspiracy of harassment over the previous year. and a half. >There is a madman running loose about London, called David Campbell;. I have >no reason to believe that he is violent, but he should certainly. be >approached with caution. You may know him by the. curious glitter in his >eyes and a persistent trembling of his hands; if that. does not suffice, you >will find him attempting to thrust no fewer. than 48 books into your arms, >all hardbacks, with a promise that, if you should return to the. same >meeting-place. next year, he will heave another 80 at you. > >If, by now, the police have arrived and are keeping a close. watch on him, >you may feel sufficiently emboldened to examine the books. The. jackets are >a model of uncluttered typography,. elegantly and simply laid out; there is >an unobtrusive colophon of a rising. sun, probably not picked at random. >Gaining confidence. - the lunatic is smiling by now, and the policemen, who >know about such things, have significantly removed their helmets. - you >could do worse than take the. jacket off the first book in the pile. The >only word possible to describe. the binding is sumptuous; real cloth in a >glorious shade. of dark green, with the title and author in black and gold >on. the spine. > >Look at it more closely; your eyes do not deceive you -. it truly does have >real top-bands and tail-bands, in yellow, and, for. good measure, a silk >marker ribbon in a lighter green. The. paper is cream-wove and acid-free, >and the book. is sewn, not glued. > >Throughout the encounter, I. should have mentioned, our loony has been >chattering away, although what he is trying to say. is almost impossible to >understand; after a time,. however, he becomes sufficiently coherent to make >clear that he is trying to sell the books. to you. Well, now, such quality >in bookmaking. today can only be for collectors' limited editions at a >fearsome price. - #30, #40, #50? > >No, no, he says, the glitter. more powerful than ever and the trembling of >his hands rapidly. spreading throughout his entire body; no, no - the books >are priced variously at #7, #8 or #9,. with the top price #12. > >At this, the policemen understandably put their helmets back on; one. of >them draws his truncheon and the other can. be heard summoning >reinforcements on his. walkie-talkie. The madman bursts into tears, and >swears it is all. true. > >And. it is. > >David Campbell has acquired the. entire rights to the whole of the >Everyman's Library, which died a lingering and. shameful death a decade or >so ago, and he proposes to. start it all over again - 48 volumes this >September and 80 more next year, in editions I. have described, at the >prices specified. He proposes to launch his amazing. venture simultaneously >in Britain and the United States,. with the massive firepower of Random >Century at his back. in this country, and the dashing cavalry of Knopf >across the water, and no one who loves literature. and courage will forbear >to. cheer. At the time this article was written I. had believed for some time that columnists. in the Times and other journalists had been making references to my situation. Nothing unusual about this you. may think, plenty of people have the same sort of ideas and obviously the papers. aren't writing about them, so why. should my beliefs not be as false as those of others? What makes this article so extraordinary is that three or. four days immediately. preceding its publication, I had a meeting with a friend, during the course of which we discussed. the media persecution, and in particular that by. Times columnists. It seemed to me, reading the article by Levin in Saturday?s paper, that he was. describing in some detail his "artist?s impression" of that. meeting. Most telling are the final sentences, when he writes, "The madman. bursts into tears, and swears it is all. true. And it is." Although I did not "burst into tears" (he seems to be using a bit of. poetic licence and exaggerating) I did try hard to convince my friend that it was all true;. and I am able to concur with Mr Levin, because, of. course, it is. At the beginning of the piece Levin reveals a. fear of being attacked by the "irrational" subject of his story, saying "I have. no reason to believe that he is violent, but he should certainly. be approached with caution". This goes back to the xenophobic propaganda of "defence". against a "threat" which was seen at the very beginning. of the harassment. The impression of a "madman running loose". who needs to be controlled through an agency which assigns to itself the mantle of the "police" is also one. which had been expressed. elsewhere. In the final paragraph of this extract,. his reference to Everyman?s Library as having "died a. lingering and shameful death a decade or so ago" shows clearly. what sort of conclusion they wish to their campaign. They want a permanent solution, and as. they are prevented from achieving that solution directly, they waste significant resources on methods which have. been repeatedly shown to be. ineffective for such a purpose. 1872 Tag: Computer shuts down automatically. Tag: 292909
  - 4
    - M-I,5`Pe rsecution ` Berna rd Levin expre sses h is views The article of which part is reproduced below was. penned by Bernard Levin for the Features section of the. Times on 21 September 1991. To my mind, it described the situation at the time and. in particular a recent meeting with a friend, during which I for the first. time admitted to someone other than my GP that I had been. subjected to a conspiracy of harassment over the previous year. and a half. >There is a. madman running loose about London, called David Campbell; I have >no reason to believe. that he is violent, but he should certainly be >approached. with caution. You may know him by the curious glitter in his >eyes and a persistent trembling of his. hands; if that does not suffice, you >will find him attempting to. thrust no fewer than 48 books into your arms, >all hardbacks, with a. promise that, if you should return to the same >meeting-place next year, he will heave another. 80 at you. > >If, by now, the police have arrived and are keeping a close watch on. him, >you may. feel sufficiently emboldened to examine the books. The jackets are >a model of. uncluttered typography, elegantly and simply laid out; there is >an. unobtrusive colophon of a rising sun, probably not picked at random. >Gaining confidence - the lunatic is. smiling by now, and the policemen, who >know about such things, have. significantly removed their helmets - you >could do worse than take the jacket off. the first book in the pile. The >only word possible to describe the binding is sumptuous;. real cloth in a >glorious shade of dark green, with the title and author. in black and gold >on. the spine. > >Look at it more closely; your eyes do not deceive you - it truly. does have >real top-bands and tail-bands, in. yellow, and, for good measure, a silk >marker ribbon in a lighter green.. The paper is cream-wove and acid-free, >and the book. is sewn, not glued. > >Throughout the encounter, I should have mentioned, our loony has. been >chattering. away, although what he is trying to say is almost impossible to >understand; after a time, however, he becomes sufficiently coherent to. make >clear that he is trying. to sell the books to you. Well, now, such quality >in bookmaking today can only be for collectors' limited. editions at a >fearsome price - #30, #40,. #50? > >No, no, he says, the glitter more powerful than. ever and the trembling of >his hands rapidly spreading throughout his entire. body; no, no - the books >are priced variously at. #7, #8 or #9, with the top price #12. > >At this, the policemen. understandably put their helmets back on; one of >them draws his truncheon and the. other can be heard summoning >reinforcements on. his walkie-talkie. The madman bursts into tears, and >swears it is all. true. > >And. it is. > >David. Campbell has acquired the entire rights to the whole of the >Everyman's. Library, which died a lingering and shameful death a decade or >so ago, and he proposes to start it. all over again - 48 volumes this >September and 80 more next. year, in editions I have described, at the >prices specified.. He proposes to launch his amazing venture simultaneously >in Britain and the United States, with the massive firepower. of Random >Century at his back in this country, and. the dashing cavalry of Knopf >across. the water, and no one who loves literature and courage will forbear >to. cheer. At the. time this article was written I had believed for some time that columnists in the Times and other journalists had been making. references to my situation. Nothing. unusual about this you may think, plenty of people have the same sort of ideas. and obviously the papers aren't writing about them, so. why should my beliefs not be as false as those of others? What makes this article so extraordinary is that three. or four days immediately preceding its publication, I. had a meeting with a friend, during the course. of which we discussed the media persecution, and in particular that. by Times columnists. It seemed to me, reading the article by Levin in Saturday?s paper, that he was. describing in some detail his "artist?s impression". of that meeting. Most telling are the final sentences, when. he writes, "The madman bursts into tears, and swears it is all true. And. it is." Although I did not "burst into tears" (he seems to be using a bit of poetic licence and exaggerating) I did try. hard to convince my friend that it was all true; and I am. able to concur with Mr Levin, because, of. course, it is. At the beginning. of the piece Levin reveals a fear of being attacked by the "irrational" subject of his. story, saying "I have no reason to believe that he is violent, but. he should certainly be approached with caution". This goes back to the. xenophobic propaganda of "defence" against a "threat" which was seen at the very beginning of the harassment. The impression of. a "madman running loose" who needs to be controlled through an. agency which assigns to itself the. mantle of the "police" is also one which had been expressed. elsewhere. In the final. paragraph of this extract, his reference to Everyman?s Library as having "died a lingering and shameful death a. decade or so ago" shows clearly what sort of conclusion they wish to their. campaign. They want a permanent solution, and as they are prevented from. achieving that solution directly, they waste significant. resources on methods which have been repeatedly shown to be ineffective for such a. purpose. 6732 Tag: Computer shuts down automatically. Tag: 292908
  - 5
    - M.I'5-Per secution ` who knows abou t it ? -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- -= who knows about it?. =- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Many people know, both in the establishment and media, and. among the general public. Despite an absence of its target from the UK for. more than two years, the. echoes of paranoia can still be heard loud and clear from across. the water. When it started in 1990, the only people who knew were those in BBC television who were spying. on my home, and a few radio broadcasters. There were a. few cases of public harassment, but very little compared to the situation that. developed a couple of years later. The list today includes BBC. TV staff (newsreaders such as Martyn Lewis, Michael Buerk, Nicholas Witchell), people. from radio stations such as Chris Tarrant of Capital and Radio 1 DJs, people in the print. media, but also many people in the general public.. All united in a conspiracy which breaks the laws which the UK does have regarding. harassment, and all completely uncaring for any semblance of. decency or elementary respect for individual. rights. The British police (obviously) do know the nature of the harassment. and in all probability the identity of those behind it. Some time ago I made. a complaint to my local police station in London, without. positive result. The UK police are failing in their duty to see the law. enforced in not checking. the abuse. 4302 Tag: Computer shuts down automatically. Tag: 292907
  - 6
    - M-I 5`P ersecution . how and w hy di d it st art? -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- -= how and why did it. start? -= -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- The harassment didn't start by itself, so someone. must have been there at the outset to give it a firm push and set the "animals" after me. It. looks as if I was set up in June 1990, and the timing. indicates someone from university. was responsible. >One thing which has been missing from this discussion. is this simple >prognosis: that maybe he is. right and that, despite his admitted >mental condition, there really is a campaign against him organised. by >now-influential ex-students of. his university. In May or June 1990, Alan Freeman on Radio 1 read out a letter from. someone who. had known me for a few years, who wrote of the one who "wore out his welcome with random precision" (from the Pink Floyd song). Freeman went. on to say to the writer "that's a hell of. a letter you wrote there". The indication is strongly that people I had parted. from soon before nursed a grudge against me and were trying to. cause trouble for me. The suggestion is that Freeman might have shown the letter. to other people, and things could have snowballed from there. Right from the start. the real source (security services presumed). didn't announce themselves as the origin,. but let the "talkers", the radio DJs, believe that they were the originators. Think. about it; if you announce, "we're MI5 and we have a campaign against this bloke" then people might not go along. with it; but if you say, "everyone else. is getting at this bloke because he 'deserves' it" then people will join in with. fewer qualms. >Why would "they" wish to. assassinate your character? It's the classic case of hitting a. cripple to prove you're stronger. Why would the security. services expend hundreds of thousands of pounds and more than six years. of manpower to try to kill a British citizen? Because they are motivated by people who knew me at university. and feel personal animosity; because they. knew me to be emotionally weak, and it is in the nature of bullies to. prey on those known to be weak; and because they can rely on the complicity of the establishment,. which the security services manipulate and derive funding from. This. is England's biggest humiliation today,. and the British security services are intent on preventing their humiliation becoming reality by. continuing their campaign of attempted murder. to suppress the truth from becoming public. 1872 Tag: Computer shuts down automatically. Tag: 292906
  - 7
    - M I`5'Persec ution , cos t of th e operation -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= -= MI5: cost of. the operation -= -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Here's what a couple of other people. on Usenet (uk.misc) had to say regarding the cost of running. such an operation... PO: >Have some sense, grow up and smell reality. What you are talking. about PO: >would take loads of planning, tens of thousands of. pounds and lots of PO: >people involved in the planning, execution. and maintenance of it. You PO: >must have a very high opinion of. yourself to think you are worth it. PM: >But why? And why you? Do. you realize how much it would cost to keep PM: >one person under. continuous surveillance for five years? Think about PM: >all the man/hours. Say they. _just_ allocated a two man team and a PM: >supervisor.. OK., Supervisor's salary, say, #30,000 a year. Two men, PM: >#20,000 a year each. But they'd need to work in shifts. -- so it would PM: >be. six men at #20,000 (which with on-costs would work out at more like PM: >#30,000 to the. employer.) PM:. > PM: >So, we're. talking #30,000 x 6. #180,000. plus say, #40,000 for the PM: >supervisor.. #220,000. Then you've got the hardware involved. And PM: >any transcription. that needs doing. You don't think the 'Big Boss' PM: >would listen to. hours and hours of tapes, do you. PM:. > PM: >So, all in all, you. couldn't actually do the job for much less than PM: >a quarter million a year. Over five years. What are you doing. that makes PM: >it worth. the while of the state to spend over one and a quarter million PM:. >on you? Those are. pretty much the sort of calculations that went through my head once I stopped to consider what it must be costing them to. run this operation. The. partial answer is, there have been periods when the intensity has been greater, and times when little has. happened. In fact, for much of 1993 and the first half of 1994, very. little happened. Although I don't think that was for reasons of. money - if they can tap into the taxpayer they're not going to be short of. resources, are they? The more complete answer is in the enormity of. what they're doing. Relative to the cost to British pride of seeing their country. humiliated for the persecution of their own citizens, isn't is worth the cost of four or. five people to try to bring. things to a close in the manner they would wish? To the government a million or. two is quite honestly nothing - if they can convince themselves of the necessity of. what they're doing, resources will not be the. limiting factor. 9162 Tag: Computer shuts down automatically. Tag: 292905
  - 8
    - M,I.5 Pe rsecution Capital R adio - Chris Tarra nt -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-= -=. Capital Radio - Chris Tarrant -= -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-= Capital Radio DJs have been "in on it". from the start. One of the first things I heard in the summer of 1990 was from a Capital DJ who said,. "If he listens to Capital then he can't be all bad" (supportive, you see.. We're not bastards). Much of what came over the radio in 1990 is now so. far away the precise details. have been obliterated by time. No diary was kept of the details,. and although archives if they exist may give pointers, the ambiguity of what broadcasters said would leave that open. to re-interpretation. In spring 1994, Chris Tarrant on his. Capital morning show made an aside to someone else in the studio, about a person. he didn't identify. He said, "You. know this bloke? He says we're trying to kill him. We should be done for attempted. manslaughter". That mirrored something I had said. a day or two before. What Tarrant said was understood by the staff member in the studio he. was saying it to; they said, "Oh no, don't say that" to Tarrant.. If any archives exist of the morning show (probably unlikely) then it. could be found there; what he said was so out of context that he. would be very hard put to find an explanation. A couple of days later, someone at the. site where I was working repeated the remark although in a different way; they said there. had been people in a computer room when automatic fire extinguishers went off. and those people were. "thinking of suing for attempted manslaughter". Finally, this isn't confined. to the established radio stations. In 1990 after I had listened to a pirate radio. station in South London for about half an hour, there was an audible phone call in. the background, followed by total silence. for a few moments, then shrieks of laughter. "So what are we supposed to say now? Deadly torture? He's going to talk to us now,. isn't he?", which meant that they could hear what I would say in my. room. 6732 Tag: Computer shuts down automatically. Tag: 292904
  - 9
    - M I-5 Pers ecution bugg ing an d counter-surveilla nce -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- -= MI5: bugging. and counter-surveillance -= -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- PO: >Did you ever look for the bugs in your house ? If not, why not. ? I mean if PO: >I thought. that was happening to me, I'd search the place from top to bottom, PO: >I mean I live there I would know if anything was out of place. If. I was PO: >really suspicious, I would. call in one of those bug detection teams which PO: >have those machines that pick up the transmitted radio waves.. This PO: >reminds. me of BUGS, that new programme on BBC1 on That's exactly what. we did. We went to a competent, professional detective agency in London, paid them over 400 quid to debug our. house. They used scanner devices which go to over 1 GHz and would pick. up any nearby transmitter in that range,. they also checked the phones and found nothing... but if the tap. was at the exchange, then they wouldn't find anything, would. they? CS: >Doesn't this suggest. to you that there are, in fact, no bugs to be found? You can. assume that they've done this sort of thing to other people in more "serious". cases, where they would know the targets would suspect the presence of electronic surveillance. So. they will have developed techniques and devices which. are not readily detectable either by visual inspection or by electronic means. What those techniques. might be, I couldn't guess. In this case,. the existence of bugging devices was clear from the beginning, and they "rubbed it in" with what was said. by the boy on the coach. It was almost as if they wanted counter-surveillance people to. be called in, who they. knew would fail to detect the bugging devices, causing loss of credibility. to the other things I would have to say relating to the harassment. I did. all the things someone in my situation would do to try to find the bugs. In addition to calling in. professional help using electronic counter-surveillance, I made a close visual inspection of. electrical equipment, plus any. points where audio or video surveillance devices might have. been concealed. Of course, I found nothing. Normal surveillance "mini-cameras" are. quite noticeable and require visible supporting circuitry. It seems to me the best place to put a. small video surveillance device would be additional to a piece of electronic equipment such. as a TV or video. It would be necessary. to physically break in to a property to fit such. a device. 4302 Tag: Computer shuts down automatically. Tag: 292903
  - 10
    - M'I.5'Per secution ' th e BBC, televisio n a nd ra dio -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-= -= the. BBC, television and radio -= -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-= The first incident in June 1990 was when a BBC. newsreader made what seemed to be a reaction. to something which had happened in my home, and out of context of what they. were reading. My first reaction was disbelief; nothing of the sort had ever happened before,. the idea that such a thing could occur had not crossed my mind, yet. there was no doubt of what had just taken place. My disbelief eroded as this. recurred time after time. Besides the. news, offenders included shows such as Crimewatch (!), Newsnight, and "entertainment" shows. There seems to be very little. moral understanding among the people. who make these programmes; they just assume they will never. be caught, so they carry on without a thought for the illegality or amorality of what they do. The only time I ever heard a word. raised in doubt was by Paxman being interviewed by someone. else (I think by Clive Anderson) back in 1990; referring to the "watching". he said it troubled him, and. when asked by the host what you could do about it, replied "Well, you could just switch it. off" (meaning the surveillance monitor in the studio). He clearly didn't let his doubts stand in the way of. continued surreptitious. spying from his own or other people's shows, though. Now you're convinced this. is a troll, aren't you? This story has been the subject of much debate on the. uk.* Usenet newsgroups for over a year, and some readers believe. it to be an invention (it has even been suggested that a group of psychology. students are responsible!), others think it symptomatic of. a derangement of the author, and a few give it credence. Quite a few people do know. part or all of the story already, so this text will fill in the gaps in their knowledge. For the rest,. what may persuade you. of the third possibility is that some of the incidents detailed are checkable against any archives. of radio and TV programmes that exist; that the incidents involve. named people (even if those hiding in the shadows have not made their. identity or affiliations evident), and those people may be. persuaded to come out with the truth; and that the campaign of harassment is continuing today both in the. UK and on the American continent, in a none-too-secret fashion;. by its nature the significant risk of exposure increases with. time. On several occasions people said to. my face that harassment from the TV was happening. On the first day I worked in Oxford, I spent the evening in. the local pub with. the company's technical director Ian, and Phil, another employee. Ian made a few references to me and. said to Phil, as if in an aside, "Is he the bloke who's been on TV?" to which. Phil replied, "Yes, I think. so". I made a. number of efforts to find the bugs, without success; last year we employed professional counter-surveillance people to scan for bugs. (see later) again. without result. In autumn 1990 I disposed of my TV and watched virtually no television for the next three. years. But harassment from TV stations has gone. on for over six years and continues to this day. This is something that many. people obviously know is happening; yet the TV staff have the morality of paedophiles, that because. they're getting away with it they feel. no wrong. Other people who were involved. in the abuse in 1990 were DJs on BBC radio stations, notably disc jockeys from Radio 1 and other stations (see. the following section). Again,. since they don't have sense in the first place they can't be expect to have the moral sense not to be part of. criminal harassment. 1872 Tag: Computer shuts down automatically. Tag: 292902
  - 11
    - Error on Kernell32.DLL Encountered the following error: *ANNCLIST has caused an error in Kernell32.DLL. Annclist will now close. If you continue to experience problems try restarting your computer.* Actions: I restarted the computer, same window appeared with the above notice. I also *restored to 12/26/07.* Same problem ocurred after system was restored. Problems ocurred when: I have noticed two instances when the above problem window shows up: 1) When the window appears to log on my password. 2) When running a thorough scan of Adaware SE - it gets stuck on 97,575 files and it does not get any further. Any advice will be appreciated. Running Win Me, IE 6 SP1 Tag: Computer shuts down automatically. Tag: 292890
  - 12
    - Itunes not compatible I just got an ipod and found out that Windows ME is not compatible with itunes. Is it worth the $100 to upgrade to Windows XP or should I just get a new computer? I mostly use my pc for e-mail and storage of pictures, old files, etc. Any advice is greatly appreciated! Tag: Computer shuts down automatically. Tag: 292883
  - 13
    - M`I 5`Persecution ` B BC New scasters L ie & D eny Theyre Wat ching Me MI5 Persecution: BBC Newscasters Lie & Deny They're Watching. Me Central to. the persecution campaign waged against me for some nine years now by the Security Service is their use. of the media, and in particular the broadcast media, to make. clear to me that I am under surveillance and being watched within my own home, even by. BBC newscasters while they read the news. This is really an act. of arrogance; MI5 and their tools in the television and radio are so. sure that they can never be caught, that they have many times made explicity clear on broadcast programmes that they. are as capable of seeing me. as I am of seeing the broadcast pictures. Even when they have known I am. taping the programmes they still carry on this practice; for examples of TVand radio presenters caught. "in action", see the Evidence area. of my website. If you wish to. reply to this article...... then please include your name and fax number! I. provide the means for recipients to send me their thoughts on the topics discussed,. but ask that you provide me with your fax. number or email address if you require a response. Also would you please send not more. than one or two pages, if by fax.. Thank-you! It started. with a Newscaster, and it continues with Newscasters today The very first incident in the story started. with a reaction by an ITN newscaster, Sue Carpenter, in. June of 1990, almost nine years ago now. She reacted to what she saw in my living room at home as she. read the news. My mother had brought an apple for me into the room,. whereupon the newsreader smirked and giggled, apparently. finding this funny. I couldn't believe what I was seeing. I carried on. watching news and other television programmes to see if. presenters would show signs of "interactive watching"; to my surprise, this happened again and. again. Unfortunately, I did. not have my wits sufficiently about me to videotape these programmes, and it is now almost impossible to obtain. recordings dating back to 1990. However, I have been busy recording everything Ive watched the. last couple of years, and the taping has yielded. some nuggets, which you will find if you point your Web browser at the "evidence" area of. my website, whose URL address is given above. Strangely it is not. particularly the BBC who are "after me" at the moment. (with the exception of occasional fire from Nicholas Witchell), but that supposed paragon. of virtue and decency Jon Snow of Channel Four TV News (he actually works for ITN), who. once claimed hed turned down MI5s offer of a tax-free salary. I will cover. Snows recent actions. in a future article. BBCs Hidden. Shame The first ever Usenet post (internet newsgroup article). on the subject of the MI5 bugging / BBC watching occurred, as stated in a previous. article, in early May 1995. It is. reproduced here; Date: Thu. May 4 18:27:24 1995 Newsgroups:. alt.conspiracy Subject: BBC's. Hidden Shame Remember the two-way televisions in George Orwell's. 1984? The ones which watched you back? Which you could never get rid. of, only the sound could be. turned down? Well the country which brought Orwell into the world. has made his nightmare follow into the world after him. Since 1990 the. British have been. waging war against one of their own citizens using surveillance to invade privacy and a campaign of abuse in the transmitted media. in their efforts to humiliate their. "victim". I suppose "BBCs Hidden Shame" is. more of a wish than a fact. It may be hidden, but the BBC and. other media and security organisations seem to have no shame. whatever in their anti-social, not to say criminal, actions. Nor do the. general public, who seem quite happy to parrot the vilest obscenities without much hesitation. or apparently thought. Martyn Lewis,. Nicholas Witchell and the rest Most of the harassment occurred in 1990-92, when. I wasnt making any recordings, and the BBC wont release copies of. current affairs programmes from that period..... so although I can remember there were many incidents in that time, even many specifics, I. cant dig up the actual programmes to flesh out the. bones. This year, there has. been at least one incident with Nicholas Witchell as newsreader, which. I have successfully recorded and digitized, i.e.. converted into a computer Quicktime movie file. This has not yet found its way. onto my website (Im a busy man, dontcha know) but you can be sure I. will let the readership of these articles know when that clip makes it onto the web. The Witchell clip was. recorded on Saturday 10 April 1999 at 7pm, and. shows Witchell trying to restrain his features from collapsing into a smirk. First his upper lip quivers for several minutes,. then with the non-excuse of a non-joke his. entire face twists into a grin. It looks as if he finds me so funny,. that he allows himself to submerge any pretence. at professionalism in a sea of MI5-inspired sarcasm and harassment. The two BBC. newscasters whose reactions to me I can remember most vividly over the. years are Martyn Lewis and Nicholas Witchell. I can remember thinking. years ago that Michael Buerk was also seeing me at home; and if the other two are watching then there would be no. reason why he wouldnt be doing the same; but in all honesty. I cannot remember a single clear instance of his reacting through facial or verbal expression to. me. I can remember several instances. of Martyn Lewis reacting to what he saw of me, however. In early 1992 I was watching the BBC news with Lewis. on a small black-and-white portable TV at my then home in Oxford. I. threw a term of abuse at Lewis; he flinched, then gave a grin and made a. comment from which I. understood that he had been on my side, but might have changed his mind as a result of what Id just. said to him. And in spring 1991 I. remember Martyn Lewis clearly reacting to what he saw of me at my then accommodation in Woking, Surrey, by continuing to. stare at. some fixed point near the camera after the news had finished - presumably this is where the monitor interactively showing. pictures of my room. was located. Why would BBC and other Newscasters Watch and Harass Me,. Watching Them? This is a very difficult. question, and I dont actually know the answer. It is a matter of record that the Secret Services are. very much part of the Establishment. The recent exposure of the "MI6. Agent List" on the internet, and its coverage in the newspapers, reveals how much MI5 and. MI6 are. recruited from the ranks of the Establishment. Obviously the relationship is bi-directional; the. Establishment influences MI5/MI6, but the secret services (well, perhaps not so secret now we know who. works for MI6!!!) also influence the machinery of power and. information dissemination i.e. media in this. country. So they must have a lot of covert leverage. with the BBC and ITN. Some of this. leverage is obviously through bribery. It is a matter of record that. MI5 tried some years ago to "buy" Jon Snow of Channel Four TV.. He turned them down - obviously they must have approached other media people as well,. and from the lack of other reports of people turning them down, it may be presumed that some other. journalists will have accepted the. sugared carrots put before them. Ironically, Jon Snow has been taking part in the recent "watching" actions. against me - but why he has allowed himself to. be used by the secret services is something which I do not know. Perhaps the Security Service uses blackmail to twist arms. of journalists into co-operating with them? I have. always thought there was something slightly. odd about Martyn Lewiss demeanour. At the time of the Ron Davies "rough trade". scandal it was reported that MI5 had known all about Davies predilections and the sham of his pretence to be a. happily married man. Perhaps MI5 have been able to dig. something up from Martyn Lewiss private life to blackmail him into acting on their. behalf? And if there wasnt anything. before the "newscaster watching" started then there most certainly is something. now.... once theyve started watching, the newscasters. will surely wish their activities to remain covered-up, and co-operate. with the security service. "Newscaster Watching". Deliberately Constructed to Mimic Schizophrenia Presumably this is. the first case in history of television journalists actually taking. part in acts of real-time, live spying and reacting against. one of their viewers. What you have to understand, though, is that I was quite mentally. healthy in June 1990, certainly relative to November 1992, when. after two and a half years of harassment I was finally admitted to hospital as an out-patient. MI5 decided from the outset that they. would make me mad; they constructed the media harassment to resemble. what would be reported by a person with. mental illness; and then they carried on years of abuse to inflict on me. the condition which they wished to use as an excuse to cover up their. abuses. I sold. my portable TV in autumn 1990 and stopped watching television regularly. I realise now that this may. have been a mistake. What I should have done was. to watch TV and listen to the radio, but tape-record everything and make a note of what each. excerpt meant to me. I would then be in a much stronger position as regards to evidence that. I am now. That is what I am trying to do now, but unsurprisingly. the TV/radio presenters have stopped getting at me, now they. know they are being recorded. When I started publicising my case on internet newsgroups in 1995, I. was met with the disbelief one might expect. to be accorded to a mentally ill person. who talks about "newscaster watching" and media persecution. Some newsgroup participants thought I had. started a "troll", an invention made to obtain a reaction; one bright. spark even suggested a group of psychology students were. behind the articles. But most people thought the articles were symptomatic of derangement - and. that is exactly what MI5 want people to think.. MI5 chose me as a target because I was mildly mentally ill at the. outset in 1990, although I stress my illness then was very mild in comparison with November 1992, and because they knew. that enough abuse would (a) make me much more seriously ill, and (b). once I was more ill, they would "get away" with. a harassment deliberately constructed to look like the symptoms of paranoid. schizophrenia. Martyn. Lewis Denies & Lies, But Wont in Writing In February 1997 I wrote to. BBC Viewer & Listener Correspondence and asked them to investigate the claim that their. newscasters had engaged in "real-time spying" on me. They replied. that they had asked Martyn Lewis and Michael Buerk whether they. had engaged in such practices, and that they had. both made verbal denials to VLC, but were refusing to put their denials. in writing. To me it looks. as if Lewis and Buerk are happy to lie verbally but not in writing, because written falsehoods would place them unambiguously in. the wrong, whereas they can try to talk their way out. of verbal lies if they are ever caught, or perhaps even deny the verbal lies completely?. If they lie without shame, then. why would they have any shame about future lies about. lying? BBC-VLC also said that the BBC. "would never engage in any form of surveillance activity" such as that described. Clearly Martyn. Lewis and the rest have lied. to their own organisations personnel about their criminal actions. So. much for the "objective", "truthful" BBC, a nest of shabby. liars. Summons against the BBC, for Nuisance caused by. Newscaster Spying In March 1997 I issued a civil summons against the BBC, seeking. injunction against further "newscaster. spying", and token damages for what the BBC had done to me until that date.. The purpose of the summons was to try to "smoke out" the BBC, since obviously I did not have good. evidence which would be necessary for either a. civil or criminal case to be made against them. My summons. was worded as follows; 1. The plaintiff is and was at all material times. residing at [home address]. At some time prior to or during June 1990, persons. of unknown identity entered. Plaintiff's premises and installed concealed television equipment. in said premises. 2. A campaign of harassment was launched against the. Plaintiff by the persons of unknown. identity, which in part took the form of instigating harassment by BBC TV newscasters. (including specifically Michael Buerk and Martyn Lewis) as they read news bulletins, by. making direct and personal comments to. Plaintiff. 3. The campaigns purpose. was to subject Plaintiff to great mental stress and induce mental breakdown. As a result of. it Plaintiff did indeed suffer from. severe mental strain in 1990-97. 4. In order to avoid the mental strain being caused to. him the Plaintiff has been compelled to stop watching BBC. TV news. Defendant therefore committed the tort of private nuisance, since normal use of home. was interfered. with. 5. Plaintiff. claims a permanent injunction prohibiting further nuisance, and. damages for nuisance suffered limited to 5,000. Naturally, my attempt to smoke-out the BBC and. its lying newscasters failed. The BBCs litigation department sought to have my. summons struck out; and they succeeded in doing so, on the grounds. of my action "disclosing no reasonable cause of action". I was also. prevented from issuing further civil claims against the. BBC without leave of the Court. Apparently litigants-in-person frequently / usually. have their claims struck out with. this wording, regardless of the merit of their claims. BBC Suppresses my Claims. of "Watching by Newscasters" BBCs staff magazine Ariel ran my advert "BBC. Newsreaders Spying on my home" for one issue in. the Personal category on 8/July/1997 before it was spotted and axed by editor Robin. Reynolds; please see webpage;. http://www.pair.com/spook/evidence/plaint/ariel.htm Clearly the BBC will not allow claims of. its wrongdoing to be made public in. the media channels it controls. On several occasions people said to my face that harassment. from the TV was happening. On the first day I worked in Oxford, I spent the. evening in the local pub the. Rose and Crown with the company's technical director Ian, and Phil, another employee. Ian made a few. references to me and said to Phil, as if in an. aside, "Is he the bloke who's been on TV?" to which Phil replied, "Yes,. I think so". The reader might think that mere "watching" by newscasters etc might be. a relatively benign happening. But it. is not; it is part of MI5s framework of harassment and. lies. On many occasions the reactions of the BBCs newscasters to me has been in the nature of sarcasm, implicit. contempt and abuse. This is visible in Witchells news programme mentioned above,. where he. engages in abuse by laughing at me during his newsreading. It was particularly visible. in the early period of 1990-92, and as late as Autumn 1993,. when during a Newsnight broadcast Jeremy Paxman interviewed a football person. about soccer hooliganism, and the interviewee gave vent to an unsubtle rant about "theyre idiots, theyre just. idiots, keep up the surveillance". Paxman. started grinning, showing he understood and was taking part in the abuse being perpetrated on. that programme. Conclusion The MI5 Persecution started with harassment. by television newscasters, and today harassment by. TV and radio presenters still forms a key part of MI5s activities against me. When this business. started in June 1990 I was in relatively good. health of mind. Years of persecution by the secret police and their mouthpieces in the. state-run BBC and other media eroded my health. until MI5 achieved their aim of seeing me rendered mentally ill in November 1992. The diagnosis which was. forced on me unfortunately and ironically meant. that my reports of the harassment are disregarded, because the mentally ill. are second-class citizens in todays Britain. Yet TV and radio harassment continues, albeit. in a reduced form, despite my taping all the. programmes I watch, resulting in my being able to obtain and demonstrate objectively on the website. instances of media presenters attacking me. Unfortunately these. recorded instances are quite tenuous; I might understand them, the presenters understand what it is. theyre doing, but despite. many thousands of people knowing the truth of the "newscaster watching", the omerta. continues and they continue to refuse to admit the truth of the matter. It is a terrible. indictment of British society that there is not. even one decent person willing to speak out. I look forward to the day when the truth does finally emerge, and. the mass corruption which has allowed. the MI5 persecution to take place is finally purged and the Establishment. criminals caught and appropriately punished. 5423 Tag: Computer shuts down automatically. Tag: 292882
  - 14
    - M'I.5'Persecution , Fou r Yea rs of MI5 Persecuti on Pos ts on Inte rnet New sgroups Four Years. of "MI5 Persecution" Posts on Internet Newsgroups For. approximately the first three years of the MI5 persecution, from June 1990 until late 1992, I kept as quiet as possible, in the. hope that by not reacting, MI5s interest in me would decrease and they. would simply go away of their. own accord. This is the sort of behaviour some people employ against bullies; if the bullies arent getting a reaction, then. they might simply go away and victimize someone. else. Unfortunately,. this tactic didnt work. The quieter I became, the more shrill and hysterical the noise from the Security Service operatives.. For about two years I didnt watch TV news at all. Yet this only. heightened their obsessed fixation;. they continued to follow me wherever I went, they continued. to induce harassment at work by managers and fellow workers, and they continued. to encourage me to commit suicide. They seemed to regard my refusal to react as a crime which they would have to. "put right" by ever more extreme forms of. abuse. Finally, in 1995, I changed tactics radically. Since late. 1994 I had had accounts with internet. providers in Ontario, Canada. I discovered the cornucopia of internet newsgroups, on every topic. from consumer electronics, to politics and legal topics, and I. discovered online services such as Compuserve and AOL. In May 1995, I made the first. posting to the conspiracy newsgroup, on the. subject of "BBCs Hidden Shame". BBC's. Hidden Shame The internet newsgroup discussion, which has now. reached its fourth anniversary, started with an article in. alt.conspiracy, which I reproduce here. Date: Thu May 4 18:27:24. 1995 Newsgroups:. alt.conspiracy Subject:. BBC's Hidden Shame Remember the two-way televisions in George Orwell's 1984? The. ones which watched you back? Which you could. never get rid of, only the sound could be turned down? Well the country which brought Orwell into the world. has made his nightmare follow into the world. after him. Since 1990 the British have been waging war against one of their own citizens using surveillance to. invade privacy and a campaign of abuse in the transmitted media. in their efforts to humiliate their "victim". And the most remarkable thing about it is that what they. do is not even illegal - the UK has no laws to protect the privacy of its citizens, nor does it. proscribe harassment or abuse except in the. case of racial abuse. A lot of people in England know this to be going on, yet so far they have. maintained perfect "omerta"; not a sound, not a. squeak has escaped into the English press, and for all the covert harassment absolutely nothing has come. out into the public domain. Have the British gone mad?. I think we should be told At this. point, I did not name MI5 as my persecutors. I was still unsure that they were. the ones responsible for the "psychological terrorism". In followup posts however I did name. them; and the persecutors have never denied the claim; so I. think my guess is valid. (The Security Service Tribunal in. 1997 have said "no determination in your favour was made", but it is a well established fact that. MI5 lies routinely to the Tribunal which has never found in favour. of a plaintiff, so no conclusions can be drawn. from this.) This first post was made to. alt.conspiracy, but further posts were made to the UK-local newsgroups, in. particular uk.misc but also uk.legal and uk.politics (which. is now called uk.politics.misc). Some time ago I tried to. take the battle to the Compuserve forums, UKPOLITICS (which is now called UKCURRENT - current affairs), but my articles were censored. by the forum operators. Such censorship is impossible. on the internet newsgroups. Police. Refuse to Act I have complained several times to the Metropolitan Police, who. have each time. refused to help. From:. Green <Green@guidion.demon.co.uk> Newsgroups:. uk.misc,uk.politics,alt.politics.british,soc.culture.british Subject: Re: MI5 Persecution: Why Aren't the. British Police Doing Their Job? Reply-To:. Green@guidion.demon.co.uk Date:. Sun Apr 7 21:13:30 1996 In article. <DpIE0r.736.0.bloor@torfree.net> bu765@torfree.net "Mike Corley" writes: >Last Easter (1995) I went into the local police station in London and spoke. to >an officer about the harassment against me. But I couldn't. provide tangible >evidence; what people said,. in many cases years ago, is beyond proof, and >without something to support my. statements I cannot expect a police officer to >take the. complaint seriously. This in itself dos not suggest that the police have it. in for you. The old bill operates on extremely tight. spending limits forced on them by that pillock Michael Howard, and without evidence, they often. have higher priorities than chasing something that cannot. go to court. I doubt that the police are actually. being leant on, but they probably realise that if they looked into this, they would be leant on hard. The. met always stays away from anything. that looks like it has Defence, Security or secret service interest already, because they realise that they are below these government agencies. in the general pecking. order. If I walked into. my local nick and complained that MI5 were snooping on me, they would show me the door without even looking at my evidence, because. that bored desk seargant with. only five years to go before he retires doesn't want to start fucking about with somebody who has incurred. the wrath of Stella Rimington. He would rather deal with the lost dogs and driving licence. producers, eat his cheese and pickle sandwiches and piss off home at the end of his shift than have some. high ranking spook having a go at his boss and getting. him a bollocking. In. short, you have earned much sympathy but little surprise. Just remember that saying about the enemy of. your enemies. Most recently, I wrote in. March 1999 to Charing Cross Police Station CID. They did not acknowledge or reply to my letter. When I. phoned them up,. the detective Id written to treated me to a sadly not unusual display of police. bigotry, with an uneducated rant about "your paranoid rubbish". It would be nice to think that such uneducated bigotry is something. other than wholly typical of police behaviour, but unfortunately that is. an illusion that is. rapidly dispelled. Uncorruptible Jon Snow of Channel Four. News From. previous articles the reader will know what I think Jon Snow has recently been watching me while. he reads Channel Four News in the evening.. Recently I digitized a few moments of one such broadcast, where his face twists into a smile, without there. being anything in the news broadcast to cause merriment. Here is a usenet post. from some time ago on MI5s "bought and paid for" tools in the so-called "free". press. Peter. Harding (harding@ermine.ox.ac.uk) wrote: : I was at speakers' corner on Sunday.. There was one chap who was bellowing : about something or other, I don't know what, but one. thing he said to : someone. caught my ear: : "BBC, MI5,. same thing." Can't disagree with that. sentiment. Wasn't it. documented that MI5 sometimes "bought" journalists and broadcasters? I remember reading a report by. some jouralist who had been offered an extra tax-free income by. MI5 to become their covert mouthpiece, and had refused. ............................................................................. > :. >mouthpiece, and had refused. >. : > :. It was Jon Snow of Channel 4. > > Was it reported in any of. the papers? It has been reported several times. The most recent was in Private. Eye, a. few months back. As I recall they also wanted information from him; journalists would be a natural choice for. members of the Security Service and the Secret Intelligence. Service for information sources. > It might be interesting. to see what he had to say regarding their >. attempt to recruit him. He was most concerned that many others. would have accepted such an offer. However, we. can probably make an educated guess as to some of those who. accepted: Nigel West (Rupert Allason, MP) and Chapman Pincher would come near to the. top of the list. -- \/ David Boothroyd. Socialist and. election analyst. Omne ignotum pro magnifico. British Elections and. Politics at http://www.qmw.ac.uk/~laws/election/home.html I wish I was in North Dakota. Next General Election must be. before 22nd May '97 The House of Commons now : C 324, Lab. 272, L Dem 25, UU 9, PC 4, SDLP 4, SNP 4, UDUP 3, Ind 1, Ind UU 1, Spkrs 4.. Government majority = 1. Telephone Tate 6125. Corrupt Security Service agents steal millions from. taxpayers Money is of course a. factor in the grand equation which is the MI5 persecution. It costs. money for the Security Service to "buy" people in the media etc. But that is only a small part of. their expenditure of taxpayers resources. Most of the expenditure is directly on. the salaries if the. agents involved; and in this post I put forward the theory that MI5 are trying to draw out. their involvement for as long as possible, very cynically, to maximise their income and line. their own pockets. At each stage they have tried to pretend that I am something. out of the ordinary. Either I was very stupid ("he's an idiot"). or very clever ("he's like a genius"). Either I was a threat to Western civilization (Levin once referred to me as the. next Hitler) or I was completely defenceless. ("a soft toy"). Now, it should. be obvious to any person with common-sense that I am not out of the ordinary in any way.. I have an IQ which is average for the Web, I am racially white European, and there are plenty of other people. with schizophrenia or epilepsy out there who haven't. been targeted for MI5 attention, so why me? I think the answer is that the MI5 agents who. harass me have cynically exploited the situation by painting me as extraordinary in order. to assure themselves of well-paid employment. funded by the ordinary British taxpayer. To put it bluntly, they are stealing millions of pounds from the taxpayer to. feed their own pockets. This assertion is supported by the observation that it's the same agents who. are doing the harassment. Six months ago in a. local hospital I was harassed by someone whose face I had seen (he had stared straight at me. aggressively, at the time I just thought it was some. nutter but it turns out he was one of "them") aboard a KLM flight a couple of years ago. It's presumably been the same people most of the time. I've seen. the way contractors act when they don't want their positions. terminated. Would these agents really want to. lose their well-paid employment harassing me? Presumably they are promising their bosses a "breakthrough" (ie my demise) real-soon-now and. have been for the last seven years, while all the while these MI5 agents. skim millions off the. taxpayer. I wouldn't mind a job like. that. Perhaps if I persecute myself a little bit, like standing in. front of a mirror and shouting mindless obscenities, do you reckon I'd get a slice of. the caky Service Tribunal. This year Nick Brooks, current Tribunal Secretary, confirmed to me that he could not think of a. single case where the Tribunal. had found in favour of a complainant. Here is my usenet. post from two years ago. Subject: MI5: "It. wasn't us" Newsgroups:. uk.misc,uk.legal Organization:. Toronto Free-Net "The Security Service Tribunal have now investigated your complaint and. have asked me to. inform you that no determination in your favour has been made on your. complaint." Signed. ER Wilson, Tribunal Secretary Well that's. a relief then. All that spamming for nothing eh. Gaw blimey, if they say they're not doing it then. it can't be them, can it? In a recent letter to Mr Brooks I expressed the opinion. that the Tribunal were unable to fulfil their responsibilities in. the face of MI5 falsehoods. Nevertheless, I do intend to make another. complaint to the Tribunal. in the near future, despite the Tribunal appearing to be a toothless. watchdog. Discrimination. against a Unit Minority MI5 have been very clear in. their instructions as to what I should do. They. have openly shouted at me the word "suicide", and also from the other abuse. it is clear that they want my existence terminated. This point is covered in more detail in a. previous article. The following post describes. the xenophobic nature of MI5s campaign against me. They have refined their bigotry down to a unit minority,. yet they make use of the discrimination against the. mentally ill which is a feature of current British. society. Subject: Re:. MI5 says "Kill Yourself" Newsgroups:. uk.misc,uk.legal,uk.politics.misc,uk.media References:. <zlsiida.4248.3258FE24@fs1.mcc.ac.uk> <53eeev$cmg@axalotl.demon.co.uk> Organization:. Toronto Free-Net Distribution: iain@hotch.demon.co.uk. (Iain L M Hotchkies) wrote: >Indeed. If. you've ever had a 'conversation' with someone suffering >from florid. schizophrenia, you'll know how difficult it can be to >'argue'. with them. I don't have florid symptoms. But. I'm in a difficult situation, because those people who don't. know, aren't going to believe, and those who do, they just go along with the crowd. It's never a good idea to go against the grain,. and the grain here is defined by. interests in the establishment and the media. Even people who could say out loud what was happening won't, because then there's. a risk that they'll be seen as traitors. and ostracised. Usually this type of. 'hidden abuse' is racial and targetted at a racial minority within a country. You. keep the minorities out of the good jobs, but you don't admit discrimination. exists. It happens everywhere, not just in Britain. The persecution. that is going on now is in reality a refined form of racism. Instead of "nigger". it's "nutter", and abusing the mentally ill is still socially acceptable today.. In 50 years it might not be, but today there isn't any. social or legal sanction against it. So really they've refined racial harassment down to a minority of. one. The words may be different, but the. methods are the same. 3953 Tag: Computer shuts down automatically. Tag: 292881
  - 15
    - M-I,5-Persec ution . MI 5 Was te Taxpayer Milli ons on Poi ntless Hate-Campa ign MI5 Persecution. Update: Friday 30 April, 1999 If You. Intend To Reply, Please Read This Please.... keep your. response to one page!. Faxes over a page or two will be deleted without. being read. Somewhere between 0 and. 100% The last few days there have been no. clear recordable instances of abuse. However, while travelling on the Underground, while. walking around near my home and going to friends homes, I am constantly. troubled by thoughts that those people over there might be about to. get at me; that the couple sitting in the. opposite seats laughing are in fact laughing at me; et. cetera, et cetera. A comment by. a scientist to the BSE inquiry sticks in my mind. He described the possible scale of the epidemic as. "between 0% and 100%". It might not be happening, it might not happen at. all, to any discernable degree.... or it might be total. Without. clear recording, which seems to have become impossible. the last couple of weeks, there is no way of knowing whether the harassment. really is continuing, whether we have entered a temporary hiatus, or whether. perhaps it has perhaps stopped for now. But for the time being I think there arent any reasons. to dicontinue these faxes. I only re-started them six weeks ago. in response to a resumption of MI5 harassment; and I. think I will need to be more convinced of absence of persecution. before I discontinue my complaints. The Newscasters. are still watching In. the last few weeks there have been at least a couple of fairly overt instances of "interactive watching". by newscasters. I reported this in a previous. "MI5 Persecution Update". These instances are really very rare compared to 1990-91, when. there were many dozens of such occurrences. Undoubtedly the reduction is due. to my practice of videotaping everything. I see. Recently I had the opportunity of showing this years "happenings" (Jon. Snow/Nicholas Witchell) to my psychiatrist, and he agreed that in. both cases the newscasters were expressing merriment without visible cause, and that objectively it. might be possible for my claims to be true -. although of course other people reported similar. thoughts to him, and this thinking is usually a symptom of. illness. Read About. the MI5 Persecution on the World Wide Web The March 1998 issue (number 42) of .net Magazine reviews the. website describing it as. an "excellent site". Since August 11, 1996 over 50,000 people have. browsed this website. You are encouraged to read. the web pages which include a FAQ (frequently asked questions) section outlining the nature of. the persecutors,. their methods of harassment through the media, people at work and among. the general public an evidence section, which carries audio and. video clips of media and workplace harassment, rated according. to how directly I think they refer to me objective descriptions. of the state security agencies involved scanned texts of the complaints I. have made to media and state security agencies. involved posts which have been made to netnews over the last. four years on this topic Keith Hill MP (Labour - Streatham), my elected representative,. as ever refuses to. help. MI5 Waste Taxpayer. Millions on Pointless Hate-Campaign Recently I was talking to an independent observer. about the nature and purpose. of the perceived campaign of persecution against me. The person I spoke to, a highly intelligent man, said he was struck. by the utter pointlessness of the perceived campaign against me.. He also said that, if my theories were in fact true, many people would have to. be involved, in the. surveillance itself, and in the technical side of the delivery of information. from my home to TV studios for example, if the "interactive watching" were happening. as described. He voiced these thoughts without any prompting from me; but both I and other observers had arrived. at pretty much the same. conclusions, some years ago. I saw a team of four. men at Toronto Airport in 1993 To carry out the surveillance alone, full-time, would. employ four or five men, or their equivalent in terms of man-hours.. Each man would "work" an eight-hour shift, so. you would need at least three men doing the surveillance, plus. a connecting link / manager. An indicator that this estimate is correct arrived in. 1993, when I was accosted by one of a group of four men at. Toronto Airport; he said, laughing, "if he tries to run away well find him". Plainly. these were the men who had been involved in the intrusive surveillance of me for the preceding. three years. On other occasions, I have seen the. same man on two or three occasions. On one such occasion, at Ottawas Civic Hospital in. November 1996; he gave his name to the doctor as "Alan Holdsworth" or some such; my hearing is. not very good sometimes and I am not sure of the. surname, although I am sure "Alan" was his first name. I saw exactly the. same man again in Ottawa, at the airport, in July 1998. Obviously, other people must be "working". with this person; he would not be the sole agent. employed in this case. Usenet readers views on the Cost to MI5 of. Running the Campaign Here's what a couple of other people. on internet newsgroups / Usenet (uk.misc) had to say regarding the cost of running. such an operation... PO: >Have some sense, grow up and smell. reality. What you are talking about PO: >would take loads. of planning, tens of thousands of pounds and lots of PO: >people involved. in the planning, execution and maintenance of it. You PO: >must have a very high opinion of yourself to think you are worth. it. and...... PM: >But why? And why you? Do you realize how much it. would cost to keep PM: >one person under continuous surveillance for five. years? Think about PM: >all the man/hours. Say they _just_ allocated. a two man team and a PM: >supervisor. OK., Supervisor's. salary, say, #30,000 a year. Two men, PM: >#20,000 a. year each. But they'd need to work in shifts -- so it would PM:. >be six men at #20,000 (which with on-costs would work out at more like PM: >#30,000 to. the employer.) PM:. > PM: >So, we're talking #30,000. x 6. #180,000. plus say, #40,000 for the PM: >supervisor. #220,000. Then you've got. the hardware involved. And PM: >any. transcription that needs doing. You don't think the 'Big Boss' PM: >would listen to hours and. hours of tapes, do you. PM:. > PM: >So, all in all, you couldn't actually do the job for much less. than PM:. >a quarter million a year. Over five years. What are you doing that makes PM: >it worth the while of the state to spend over one and a quarter. million PM:. >on you? Those are. pretty much the sort of calculations that went through my head once I stopped to consider what it must be costing them to. run this operation. At the very least, a quarter million a year - and probably. much more,. given the intrusive and human-resource-intensive methods employed. Times nine years. Equals. well over two million pounds - and probably much,. much more. Its wasteful for someone with my skills to be. unemployed The wastefulness. of the MI5 campaign against me is not just that of futile expenditure on their side. It is also extremely. wasteful for someone with my talents to be unemployed and on. a disability pension. I am highly qualified in numerate disciplines, yet. am unable to work, specifically because of the MI5 hate-campaign against me. It is. a terrible waste of resources for a supposedly efficient economy. like that of the UK to be squandering the talents of a skilled and. capable worker. I made every effort to remain in employment for as. long as I could, but ultimately I was. defeated by MI5s employment of massive resources specifically targeted on my workplaces with. the sole aim of seeing me evicted from those workplaces. You might expect. this sort of behaviour from the Stasi or. some other secret police force in a communist country where labour is cheap, and the governments aim on seeing. its citizens confined; but for a supposedly free. and efficient economy like Britains, the wastefulness resulting. both directly and indirectly from the Security Services activities is simply criminal, and should never be. allowed. The international. dimension means the costs are multiplied many times overoer had any sense, then they have surely taken leave of them. over the last. nine years. Four years of persecution. in Canada The persecution re-started within. less than five minutes of my arrival in Canada, as. documented above, and in the "frequently asked questions" article on the website. The words, "if he tries to. run away well find him" spoken by one. of the harassers at Toronto Airport are now imprinted. on my mind. A year later I emigrated to Canada, intending to find a. job and settle there, hoping that MI5s. interest in me might dim with time. I did manage to find work there, but my hopes. of avoiding Security Service interest were ground. into dust. As detailed above, I saw the same man in November 1996 and July 1998, both times in. Ottawa. Apart from these encounters, there were numerous incidents between 1994 and 1998 of. harassment, of an identical nature and in most cases using identical. words to what had occurred in the UK. It. became quite clear to me that the permanent surveillance and harassment operation which MI5 had subjected me to. in England. was being continued. For a team of four or. five men to be employed overseas must cost a lot more than if they operate in. their home country. And for MI5 to continue the operation for a period of over. four years, continuously, must cost many hundreds of thousands of pounds. This. confirms my belief that the state is funding the campaign against mehat the. Security Service receives current annual funding of #160M. Divided by 1850. staff, works out at #86,000. But. the unit annual cost of each "watcher" must be much higher than this, especially. given the frequently mobile and overseas nature of their actions of the last few years. A very. conservative figure might be a little over #100,000 pa for each of a team of five people, or. half a million pounds per year. For nine. years, so far. So the most conservative estimate of the. surveillance element alone is perhaps four or five million pounds since. 1990. This guesstimate is of course. theoretical - I am not privy to inside details of how MI5 split their funding. But to take. some other examples, the cost of a US. counter-surveillance specialist per day is USD 5,000. Even if the agents permanently assigned to. me are not of this calibre - even if they. employ specialists when difficult work planting bugs etc is encountered - their salary and support costs. must still be very high. The. individual agents are doing well for themselves as they are well-paid to exercise psychopathic instincts which. in any sane society would. see them in prison; but the taxpayers who must fund this terribly wasteful exercise are being "done" out of hundreds of thousands of. pounds each. year. It must be emphasised that the above. estimates are highly conservative. Besides the surveillance operation, it. must carry a high cost in man-hours to propagate covert. slanders through the population; to setup and maintain. the "interactive watching" links to TV and radio stations, which these organisations continue desparately to "lie. and deny"; and to. induce antipathy in co-workers which would not otherwise exist. Why they are wasting Millions of. Pounds on a "Nobody from South London" As remarked in the. prologue to this article, it is really most extraordinary that the Security Service spends. a chunk of its budget, every year for nine years so far, on a. meaningless campaign against a "nobody from South London". That they. are spending such a large amount of money has been confirmed. to me on several occasions, usually by oblique references to "its costing this country millions". The. supposed "logic" behind the persecution. is that MI5 wish to avoid their harassment of me, and. the involvement of the UK media, to be made public; yet as the reader will appreciate. that is a circular argument, "theyre doing it because they want to keep. it secret and avoid humiliation for themselves and their country" begs the question, "why. did they start doing it in the first place?", to which in truth I myself do not. know the answer. Plainly MI5 with its rich. budget can afford half a million pounds a year to waste on a "nobody from South London". Some time ago I. was talking to a British surveillance professional. on Compuserve who told me "this work costs a lot of money and is usally because the. person I am following has done something (usually criminal) to warrant all this. money and time being spent." Yet in this particular case it is plainly not. the "victims fault" that the harassment is taking place. The hate-campaign. against me is. completely the creation of the obsessive psychologies of the MI5 agents who have made themselves. my persecutors; it is obviously a "personal" campaign for them, and for years. they misuse taxpayer funding to feed their. insane, unnatural and fixated fantasies. 2483 Tag: Computer shuts down automatically. Tag: 292880
  - 16
    - M,I.5,P ersecution ' Com paring t he MI 5 Persecuti on wit h Germ an Fina l So lution MI5 Persecution Update:. Friday 16 April, 1999 If You Intend. To Reply, Please Read This Please.... keep your response to one page!. Faxes over a page or two. will be deleted. without being read. BBC newscaster Nicholas Witchell cant stop. himself laughing During 1990-91 there were. very many instances of "interactive television" where newscasters and other. TV presenters saw on a screen before them what was happening in my home, and reacted, frequently. by laughing. at me. During this period I unfortunately did not record these programmes. For the last year or two, I. have been recording everything I watch, and there has been a drastic. decrease in such incidents. However, on occasion, television presenters do. still engage in "interactive watching" and react to what. they see. This has been evident with Jon Snow of Channel Four News. recently - a particularly interesting case, since it has been. established that he cannot be corrupted by money (it is well-documented. that MI5 offered him a tax-free salary and he turned them down). I wonder what. device MI5 are using to encourage him to do the "interactive. watching"? On. Saturday 10 April 1999 at 7pm, Nicholas Witchell on BBC2 News reacted when. he saw that I was watching the programme, and I have his reactions stored safely on videotape. I have watched this tape several times. and I am entirely. confident that my evaluation of his reactions is correct. For several minutes his upper lip quivered in mirth as he attempted. to keep a straight face. Then finally his self-control evaporated through. the excuse of a weak joke and. his face collapsed into a grin. The strange thing is that I dont know why he was laughing at. me, what I had done recently. to "deserve" to be laughed at. The MI5 persecutors usually manage to invent some justification as to why. people should laugh at and/or abuse me ("hes an X",. "it was so funny" etc), so Mr Witchell could have been laughing. for any number of reasons. Perhaps he found the views. I have been expressing in these articles amusing? I suppose if youre paid enough money and ordered to. laugh then even the most innocuous thing becomes. funny. Jon Snow of Channel. Four News cant stop himself smirking, either. On. 12 February 1999 I was watching Channel Four News presented by Jon Snow. As usual, I was recording the programme,. so that if anything out of the ordinary happened, Id be able to. go back and watch it again. Now, Jon Snow, by. his own claim, is uncorruptible. He says he turned down an. offer of a substantial tax-free salary from MI5 - they wanted to make him their mouthpiece, and he told them where to get. off. So you will. be most surprised to learn that Jon Snow "interactively watched" me that evening, and on. many other evenings. Approximately fifteen. minutes into the programme, he announced that the US President would be making a live appearance at about. 7.30pm; I looked at the clock on the mantelpiece; and Snow saw me looking at the clock,. and visibly tried to suppress a. smirk. Uncorruptible, are you, Mister Snow? If. not money, then why are you watching me, Mister Snow? Are they forcing you to watch me? Cant. you turn the monitor off,. Mister Snow? Keith Hill MP (Labour - Streatham),. my elected representative, as ever refuses. to help. Comparing the MI5 Persecution with. German "Final Solution" It. might seem offensive to compare the mass murder of millions of civilians in wartime with the peacetime persecution of. merely one person. Yet the comparison. has been coursing through my mind for several years now, because the. brutality of German intent to "sub-humans" is very much. comparable to the brutality of British intent to someone they vituperate and term "not up to British standards". The. methods may differ, but the persecutors. mindset is the same. The Germans first targeted the mentally. disabled, too During. WW2 millions of ethnic Russians, Poles, Jews, mentally ill, gypsies and other minorities were rounded up and murdered. in purpose-built camps by. the German regime, in the name of "racial superiority". Fifty years on, the British. Secret Police, MI5, instituted a campaign of mass hysteria;. but in their cowardice, limited their activities to one single victim. It is instructive to. note that the early German "cleansing" effort was directed primarily not at Jews, but at the mentally ill. The. Nazis set up the T4 project. in the thirties to "cleanse" away 70,000 mentally disabled people, including schizophrenics and epileptics.. After WW2 the Jews with their media influence used the reaction from the. holocaust to roll back anti-semitism in. the Western countries; however, the mentally ill are today still a persecuted group in the modern Western world. as they were under the Nazis. (the current Jewish home secretary in the UK intends to bring in laws for incarceration without any criminal charge for. some mentally ill people - he protects his own minority,. but does nothing for the other minorities in todays society), and this. continuing bias forms a central cause for the current acts of persecution in. the UK. Widespread knowledge of what is happening. to the "un-British" minority In both the German persecution. of the thirties and early forties, and the current British persecution, many, many people. are well aware of whats happening. There is widespread complicity through inaction. of populace; and in a substantial. proportion of the mainstread population, the persecution had/has widespread enthusiastic. support; yet in both the German case in. the 1940s and the British today, the existence of persecution is a mass secret which must be. never admitted out loud. In the recent Lawrence case this. "secret bigotry" has been termed "institutionalised racism", and that is a very good. word for what the British are doing today The persecutory attitudes. and omerta regarding them are so. deeply ingrained in the national psyche that they define the national. mood During WW2 many Germans knew minorities. were disappearing, and through inaction quietly condoned their government's mass murder. of "un-German" minorities and. inferior "foreigners"; and in the 1990s, similarly, many. English people know what the MI5 British Secret Police have been doing, and not only condone it, but. actively take part, because of xenophobia against the "un-British" unit minority that. is the target of "British" actions. This attitude by the British persecutors has. been made explicit through the. words "he's not up to British standards"; the British seem to have found their very own "untermenschen". to victimise. Why. these obsessive "holy wars" happen This. type of aggression occurs when the majority is threatened or humiliated in some way,. economically, militarily or culturally. In pre-WW2 Germany. the threat was primarily economic and military, following Germany's humiliating defeat in the first world war. and the reparations it was forced to pay. In modern Britain,. one might guess that the majority English who are behind the persecution feel pressured by the. swiftly diminishing status of. Britain in the world, and the rapidly increasing coloured colonisation of their country, which in time will. see the ethnic English a minority in their own land,. and their more antisocial elements, unable to reply to. the obvious threat, instead project their aggression onto. another, weaker, unit minority In both cases there is a whiff of "holy war" or irrational. obsession with the persecution. Certainly the German behaviour fifty years. ago bordered on the not-quite-sane, and. the current British behaviour towards their chosen victim is strongly. tinged with a leave-taking of reason. And the choices open to the victims are the same, since MI5. will never allow me to escape them, "if he tries to run. away we'll find him", just like the commandant of Auschwitz telling the new arrivals, "the only escape. is through. the chimney". The Victim Will Destroy Us if We Dont. Destroy Him First The persecutors propaganda is the same.. Fifty years ago the Germans said, "if we don't do it to the Jews then the. Jews will do it to us"; and MI5's propaganda in the early nineties concentrated on their victim. as a "monster". aesome "untermenschen" minority. "We. are decent fellows" say the Brutal Persecutors During the course of researching this article I. read part of the very interesting book, "Hitler - A Study in Tyranny", by Alan Bullock.. This volume contains a quote. from Himmler on the "Final Solution"; "Most of you know what it means when a. hundred corpses are lying side by side, or. five hundred or one thousand. To have stuck it out, and at the same time. .... to have remained decent fellows, that is what has made us hard. This is a page of glory in. our history which has never been written and. is never to be written." In the MI5 persecution, too, there is a. thread of deliberate brutality to the sick and vulnerable, while. the persecutors maintain that "we are decent. fellows". There is almost a conscious schizophrenia in the self-attitudes of the Security Service. operatives and those in the public who they. employ against me, which reflects the contradiction evident in the German attitude above.. On the one hand, they stoop to the lowest and most base behaviour; yet at the. same time, the MI5 operatives tell themselves that since. they are civilised British people, then surely they must by definition be "decent fellows". Any indecency. is made the fault of the. victim; "hes making us persecute him, so we need feel no guilt". Yet the conduct is atypical of the way these peoples. see their normal modes of behaviour. Befslaughter was not typical of normal. German behaviour up to that point. Similarly, the current MI5. abuse goes against the. grain of British self-image as being "reserved" and "decent", since they are using terms of abuse which are common among. blacks and other supposedly less-developed races, but not among. the English. Conclusion The ultimate aim of. both persecutions is the humiliation and physical extinction of the persecuted group.. The Germans did this in a very direct way; the British Secret. Police MI5 are acting indirectly and relying on self-extinction. of their target, because in peacetime and in the current somewhat false climate. of "political correctness" more direct methods are impossible. If MI5 undertook more direct. action the mass "omerta" would be broken. I have. written this article with sincerity to show how a historically recent. persecution in another country parallels what is being done in this country today. In both cases, the. evil-doers are of their countries establishments, and rely on widespread. tacit support to maintain the persecution and omerta around. it. While the holocaust was undoubtedly the greater evil, it is important to be aware of. the fact that had the Germans not been defeated fifty. years ago, their plans would have gone through to total completion.. In Britain today no force threatens the "permanent government" of which the Security Service. forms a part; and it looks very unlikely that the. wrongs perpetrated by the MI5 secret police will ever be revealed to. public view, and the British secret state brought to justice for. its evil actions. 1013 Tag: Computer shuts down automatically. Tag: 292879
  - 17
    - Spywareblaster Update, 12/24/07 Alias Tag: Computer shuts down automatically. Tag: 292867
  - 18
    - The Problems of Registry Cleaners Hello: As was discussed in a recent thread here, registry cleaners can do more harm than good. There are 2 recent articles on this topic in the Usenet group "microsoft.public.windowsxp.general" , under the thread subjects of "Which Registry Cleaner" and "reg cleaners". Both reflected the recent postings in this newsgroup to avoid registry cleaners altogether. One post referenced an interesting forum thread at: http://aumha.net/viewtopic.php?t=28099 , which discussed the many problems that such utilities can cause. FYI. Cheers, O.J. Tag: Computer shuts down automatically. Tag: 292864
  - 19
    - Error: could not locate inf file Since installation of updates from automatic Microsoft Security Updates when I open one of the a user account (my wife, my children, and I have different user accounts) I get this message on the screen. At the top of the prompt it says- Advanced INF Install ERROR: could not locate INF file 'C:Windows\inf\GETPUSo.INF' Can you tell me what this means and how to repair it? Tag: Computer shuts down automatically. Tag: 292858
  - 20
    - Slow XP Computer Most of us have a slow XP computer. We bought it recently, and have done nothing in the way of keeping it cleaned. We have bigger hard drives, so we store more stuff. And the more stuff we store, the larger the chance is we are getting bogged down. And since we are always deleting files, creating new files, installing software, and uninstalling software, we are going to have some issues where the computer gets overloaded with the data on it, and the result is a slow XP computer. Good news, though! There is a simple fix. But before I tell you about it, let me go over some of the typical solutions you may hear. Update the Windows system: You should do this. But this does not cause the slowness. It just helps protect you from security issues. You have a virus: OK, this could be the cause. But most likely it is not. You should have an antivirus software installed already. If not, go do it. Viruses could get into the computer, and start launching programs and attacks from within your computer, which in turn would slow it down. But this would be very rare. This will not cause the slow XP computer.... Registry Repair: http://groups.google.com/group/regrepairsbv Tag: Computer shuts down automatically. Tag: 292841
  - 21
    - Routers I'm thinking of changing from wired to wireless and would like some clarification from the experts in the NG. Currently I have a Desktop connected by wire in an Office and a laptop connected by wire in another room. A new laptop is replacing the old laptop but because it has 802.11 b,g,n, I'm thinking of going wireless and when I say that I mean the Desktop would probably remained "wired" but the laptop would go wireless. From what I understand I should purchase an "N' Router but these vary significantly in price. So I'm looking for input in terms of what I should be considering. Specifically, we are connected via cable with download speeds up to 8 Mbps. The "G" series Routers vary with speeds up to 54 Mbps while the "N" series Routers vary with speeds up to 300 Mbps. If my connection only allows up to 8 Mbps, why is any of the above router speeds important? As usual I would appreciate any feedback that would enlighten me on this subject. Dan Tag: Computer shuts down automatically. Tag: 292830
  - 22
    - WU v4 for WinMe For those who need to know - and are still interested - the Windows Updates for WinMe are still currently available at the MS WinMe WU site, in spite of being out of Support by some 18 months. Just did a Clean Install (failed HDD) and all 10+ Critical Updates/Service Packs and 45+ WinMe updates (inc. some 34 language fixes) are there. Using broadband, it wasn't very much slower than using the MS Security CD (2004) and all (seemingly) installed in their correct sequence. Let's hope that MS keep them available for a few more years yet. It would be a shame to pull them for the sake of a few hundred MB or so of web space. Have noticed also that the KB articles for WinMe have recently been pruned somewhat, but at least support is still there. Thanks MS - please don't abandon us altogether. Mart Tag: Computer shuts down automatically. Tag: 292826
  - 23