webster72n
Sun Dec 11 14:38:20 CST 2005
May I respectfully disagree with your assessment of WinME, Justin?
I have experienced my share of problems, but they were 99% of the time due
to my own mishandling of the system and not fully understanding its
workings.
All those who tell you otherwise, don't know enough and surely a lot less
than Mike, who knows it inside out in detail.
Off course, you are entitled to your own opinion, which doesn't mean it has
to be the right one.
Have a nice day.
Harry.
"Justin" <Acurajustin1978@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1134331466.846987.240950@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
>
> Mike M wrote:
> > > God damn Win ME is a peice of shit...
> >
> > Not at all although the PC you are working with may well be. However
> > given your prejudice I see little point in responding further.
> >
> > > SOmebody must have been on crack when ME was designed.
> >
> > No, but you may well be. Win Me was by far the best of the Win 9x
> > systems. Rock solid and with few problems for many with its main
failing
> > being the lack of drivers for older hardware and of course few drivers
for
> > more modern hardware released since Win Me was marketed. Of course NT
> > based systems are far better than Win Me having a much more stable core
> > and not having to make do with the backward compatibility built in to
Win
> > Me that can be the cause of several problems.
> > --
> > Mike Maltby
> > mike.maltby@gmail.com
> >
>
> You're right... There is little point in responding further. I posted
> this problem on a tech board and everyone agreed ME was the worst OS
> ever. So you're outvoted ont hat one.
> The PC is fine. The hard drive checked out.
> No, Win ME is NOT more stable. I don't know where you're getting that
> from. Coming from experrience WinME was generally the root of every
> problem I've encountered, where it was in the equation.
>
