Re: Blaster Virus by Mike
Mike
Wed Aug 13 12:10:21 CDT 2003
Figgs,
Without the use of a sledgehammer and crowbar the patch won't install. What
does concern me is the worry about just one vulnerability whereas there is a
continual day on day need to be vigilant, not just on a slow news day when the
press and TV decide to publicise a particular worm. I wonder how many of
those posting today will be updating their AV signatures and downloading
patches tomorrow or next week let alone next month.
Loads of virus generated problems are being posted at the moment. None of
course due to Blaster but rather due to the installation of ten or more
patches at the same time, or the problems caused by Live Update (full
_RESTORE\TEMP folder) or the Witch Doctor (oem*.inf files), etc. etc.
Whilst it is commendable that so many want to check their systems today I
would be far happier if they were to continue to do so even on days when worms
and trojans aren't newsworthy.
Cheers,
Mike
(Who has a long overdue e-mail being written in another window <g>)
Heather <figgyd@nospam.com> wrote:
> Hi Mike.......the thought crosses my mind that these people didn't read
> the data on the Blaster patch and perhaps downloaded it.......even tho
> not needed. Would that cause these problems???