Heirloom
Sun Mar 18 23:37:06 CDT 2007
Ah, you need not be offended, please, Joanie. As stated, that was just
MHO. The have, however, had a rather poor reputation (earned or not)
amongst the Me users. I know, much of that probably stemmed from some poor
coding, or at worst, malcoding, by a number of aspiring authors.
Heirloom, old and still don't use
one.....heavy on the humble
"Joan Archer" <archer_joan@NOSPAM.com> wrote in message
news:Oik6RrXaHHA.4948@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
> Guilty on the screensaver charge me lord <g> but I like mine, it's MY
> Picture folder and it's like having my own film show on. I can come back
> in here and just sit sometimes looking at the different photos, and
> sometimes be surprised forgetting I had a particular photo on here <g>
> (don't want to forget what you look like)
>
> Feeling nicely full at the moment, Kelly took me out for Mothers Day
> Sunday lunch over the pub <g>
> Joan
>
>
>
> Heirloom wrote:
>> Regardless of origin (and this one would be, IMHO, highly suspect),
>> there is no way I would waste cpu cycles on such superfluous 'eye
>> candy.' Not to mention the fact that screensavers are of little or no use
>> on a
>> modern monitor..........
>> Heirloom, old and the simplest
>> machine, that will do the job adequately, is the best.
>
>