http://www.lavasoftsupport.com/index.php?showtopic=48708

Silj``

--
siljaline

MS - MVP Windows (IE/OE) 2003/04 AH-VSOP
________________________________________
Security Tools Updates
http://forum.aumha.org/viewforum.php?f=31

(Reply to group, as return address
is invalid - that we may all benefit)

Re: Ad-aware [01R344] /10.10.2004/ >Build v6.181 Only< by Webster72n

Webster72n
Mon Oct 11 20:26:05 CDT 2004


Wrong build for me but good work on your part.
You deserve the number one rating here.

Harry, old and trying to keep up.


"siljaline" <siljaline@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:e15fRS$rEHA.4004@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> http://www.lavasoftsupport.com/index.php?showtopic=48708
>
> Silj``
>
> --
> siljaline
>
> MS - MVP Windows (IE/OE) 2003/04 AH-VSOP
> ________________________________________
> Security Tools Updates
> http://forum.aumha.org/viewforum.php?f=31
>
> (Reply to group, as return address
> is invalid - that we may all benefit)
>
>



Re: Ad-aware [01R344] /10.10.2004/ >Build v6.181 Only< by siljaline

siljaline
Mon Oct 11 20:29:25 CDT 2004

"Webster72n" <hbethke@copper.net> wrote
> Wrong build for me but good work on your part.
> You deserve the number one rating here.

<gush> ;) Thanks, Harry -

Silj

--
siljaline

MS - MVP Windows (IE/OE) 2003/04 AH-VSOP
________________________________________
Security Tools Updates
http://forum.aumha.org/viewforum.php?f=31

(Reply to group, as return address
is invalid - that we may all benefit)



Re: Ad-aware [01R344] /10.10.2004/ >Build v6.181 Only< by Webster72n

Webster72n
Mon Oct 11 21:20:05 CDT 2004


U r welcome, Silj.

Harry.


"siljaline" <siljaline@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:ufzDqr$rEHA.2008@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> "Webster72n" <hbethke@copper.net> wrote
> > Wrong build for me but good work on your part.
> > You deserve the number one rating here.
>
> <gush> ;) Thanks, Harry -
>
> Silj
>
> --
> siljaline
>
> MS - MVP Windows (IE/OE) 2003/04 AH-VSOP
> ________________________________________
> Security Tools Updates
> http://forum.aumha.org/viewforum.php?f=31
>
> (Reply to group, as return address
> is invalid - that we may all benefit)
>
>