http://news.softpedia.com/news/No-Surprise-in-XP-Outperforming-Vista-the-Same-Is-Valid-for-Windows-2000-95-and-3-11-82457.shtml

Re: No Surprise in XP Outperforming Vista, the Same Is Valid for Windows 2000, 95 and 3.11 by Lil'

Lil'
Thu Apr 03 20:01:46 PDT 2008

"oh great" <oh@great.ge> wrote in message
news:47f58762@newsgate.x-privat.org...
> http://news.softpedia.com/news/No-Surprise-in-XP-Outperforming-Vista-the-Same-Is-Valid-for-Windows-2000-95-and-3-11-82457.shtml
>

Another viewpoint is to make the current windows reasonably fast in
comparison to the past windows, you have to update the hardware. True for
all past versions of windows. 3.0 to ME, and the other version of windows
in the NT line to Vista.
--
Dave

How about a tax to support any military conflict/police action over 3 months
old?

An actual war, we can do what's been done in the past.



Re: No Surprise in XP Outperforming Vista, the Same Is Valid for by Holz

Holz
Thu Apr 03 21:42:16 PDT 2008

On Fri, 4 Apr 2008 04:36:49 +0300
"oh great" <oh@great.ge> wrote:

> http://news.softpedia.com/news/No-Surprise-in-XP-Outperforming-Vista-the-Same-Is-Valid-for-Windows-2000-95-and-3-11-82457.shtml
>
>

The faster everyone understands that VISTA is garbage, the better we
will be. It is bad, it stinks, it's garbage, it should have never been
released.

--
Jerry McGuire: Help me, help you...
:-)


Re: No Surprise in XP Outperforming Vista, the Same Is Valid for by Frank

Frank
Thu Apr 03 22:39:37 PDT 2008

Holz wrote:

> On Fri, 4 Apr 2008 04:36:49 +0300
> "oh great" <oh@great.ge> wrote:
>
>
>>http://news.softpedia.com/news/No-Surprise-in-XP-Outperforming-Vista-the-Same-Is-Valid-for-Windows-2000-95-and-3-11-82457.shtml
>>
>>
>
>
> The faster everyone understands that VISTA is garbage, the better we
> will be.

How would a broke POS lying linux loser like you know anything at all
about Vista?

It is bad, it stinks, it's garbage, it should have never been
> released.

Wrong, dogie breadth...you should have never been released from the
mental institution...LOL!
Craw back into that open sores sh*thole you came out of.
Frank
>

Re: No Surprise in XP Outperforming Vista, the Same Is Valid for Windows 2000, 95 and 3.11 by HeyBub

HeyBub
Fri Apr 04 06:33:07 PDT 2008

Holz wrote:
>
> The faster everyone understands that VISTA is garbage, the better we
> will be. It is bad, it stinks, it's garbage, it should have never been
> released.

And this matters to you because?

The reason I ask is that there may be either a pill or a twelve-step program
available to you.



Re: No Surprise in XP Outperforming Vista, the Same Is Valid for by George

George
Fri Apr 04 06:51:04 PDT 2008

Holz wrote:

> The faster everyone understands that VISTA is garbage, the better we
> will be. It is bad, it stinks, it's garbage, it should have never been
> released.

I have seen comments like this one since Windows 3.1 was released. I
personally never use a just released OS.


Re: No Surprise in XP Outperforming Vista, the Same Is Valid for Windows 2000, 95 and 3.11 by NoStop

NoStop
Fri Apr 04 06:56:32 PDT 2008

Frank wrote:

> Holz wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 4 Apr 2008 04:36:49 +0300
>> "oh great" <oh@great.ge> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>http://news.softpedia.com/news/No-Surprise-in-XP-Outperforming-Vista-the-Same-Is-Valid-for-Windows-2000-95-and-3-11-82457.shtml
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> The faster everyone understands that VISTA is garbage, the better we
>> will be.
>
> How would a broke POS lying linux loser like you know anything at all
> about Vista?
>
I've seen it on every PC sold at Best Buy. That is those that weren't hung
up with a blue screen.

> It is bad, it stinks, it's garbage, it should have never been
>> released.
>
> Wrong, dogie breadth...you should have never been released from the
> mental institution...LOL!
> Craw back into that open sores sh*thole you came out of.

Is "craw" another word you made up like "proly"? Is the newsreader you use
also "open sores"? Are you autistic Francis? Get your T-Shirt here ...

http://bumperstickermagnet.com/autism.html?gclid=CJm5kIrHwZICFQY_agodzwWMbA

> Frank

Cheers and LOVE!

--

"Linux is a very complete and sophisticated operating system. And there is a
lot of work being done to improve it in and of itself, particularly to make
it easier to use and easier for people to set up on their personal
computers."

--Paul Maritz, senior vice-president of platforms and applications,
Microsoft

Latest Patch for MS Word ...
http://tinyurl.com/2cpbev

How to get help at Microsoft Support ...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0C2SIZ5qsSQ

Re: No Surprise in XP Outperforming Vista, the Same Is Valid for by Frank

Frank
Fri Apr 04 07:49:38 PDT 2008

NoStop, a known lying linux troll wrote:

...hehehe what a great advertisement you are for that open sores POS toy
os urbuttoo...LOL!
Craw back into that hole you keep sticking your fat pointy head out of
(when it's not up RS's hairy arse that is!)...LOL!
Loser!
Frank

Re: No Surprise in XP Outperforming Vista, the Same Is Valid for by kurttrail

kurttrail
Fri Apr 04 08:10:44 PDT 2008

Frank wrote:
> NoStop, a known lying linux troll wrote:
>
> ...hehehe

Every time I read that I here Jon Stewart's GW Bush impression.

> what a great advertisement you are for that open sores POS toy
> os urbuttoo...LOL!

Much better an advertisement than you are for your Anal Vistula.

> Craw back into that hole you keep sticking your fat pointy head out of
> (when it's not up RS's hairy arse that is!)...LOL!

And how do you know that RS has a "hairy arse?" Have you been there ?

> Loser!
> Frank

You are a loser, baby. You've lost your mind, and you cannot remember
where you left it.

--
Peace!
Kurt
Former Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei!"


Re: No Surprise in XP Outperforming Vista, the Same Is Valid for by Alias

Alias
Fri Apr 04 08:53:24 PDT 2008

George wrote:
> Holz wrote:
>
>> The faster everyone understands that VISTA is garbage, the better we
>> will be. It is bad, it stinks, it's garbage, it should have never been
>> released.
>
> I have seen comments like this one since Windows 3.1 was released. I
> personally never use a just released OS.
>

And the comments have been true about Windows Millennium and Vista.

Alias

Re: No Surprise in XP Outperforming Vista, the Same Is Valid for by Frank

Frank
Fri Apr 04 09:12:37 PDT 2008

Alias wrote:

> George wrote:
>
>> Holz wrote:
>>
>>> The faster everyone understands that VISTA is garbage, the better we
>>> will be. It is bad, it stinks, it's garbage, it should have never been
>>> released.
>>
>>
>> I have seen comments like this one since Windows 3.1 was released. I
>> personally never use a just released OS.
>>
>
> And the comments have been true about Windows Millennium and Vista.
>
> Alias

No, but the comments about you being a sheep-fukkin POS lying linux
troll and a real loser are precisely true.
Frank

Re: No Surprise in XP Outperforming Vista, the Same Is Valid for by Alias

Alias
Fri Apr 04 09:19:17 PDT 2008

Frank wrote:
> Alias wrote:
>
>> George wrote:
>>
>>> Holz wrote:
>>>
>>>> The faster everyone understands that VISTA is garbage, the better we
>>>> will be. It is bad, it stinks, it's garbage, it should have never been
>>>> released.
>>>
>>>
>>> I have seen comments like this one since Windows 3.1 was released. I
>>> personally never use a just released OS.
>>>
>>
>> And the comments have been true about Windows Millennium and Vista.
>>
>> Alias
>
> No, but the comments about you being a sheep-fukkin POS lying linux
> troll and a real loser are precisely true.
> Frank

You got it backwards again, Frank.

Alias

Re: No Surprise in XP Outperforming Vista, the Same Is Valid for by kurttrail

kurttrail
Fri Apr 04 09:26:32 PDT 2008

Alias wrote:
> George wrote:
>> Holz wrote:
>>
>>> The faster everyone understands that VISTA is garbage, the better we
>>> will be. It is bad, it stinks, it's garbage, it should have never been
>>> released.
>>
>> I have seen comments like this one since Windows 3.1 was released. I
>> personally never use a just released OS.
>>
>
> And the comments have been true about Windows Millennium and Vista.
>
> Alias

What's the difference between ME and Vista?

It took MS more than 5 years longer to shat out Vista, than it took to
shat out ME.

--
Peace!
Kurt
Former Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei!"


Re: No Surprise in XP Outperforming Vista, the Same Is Valid for Windows 2000, 95 and 3.11 by C

C
Fri Apr 04 18:33:42 PDT 2008



"Holz" <holz@my-laptop.nowhere> wrote in message
news:20080403214216.23d7fdf8@laptop...
> On Fri, 4 Apr 2008 04:36:49 +0300
> "oh great" <oh@great.ge> wrote:
>
>> http://news.softpedia.com/news/No-Surprise-in-XP-Outperforming-Vista-the-Same-Is-Valid-for-Windows-2000-95-and-3-11-82457.shtml
>>
>>
>
> The faster everyone understands that VISTA is garbage, the better we
> will be. It is bad, it stinks, it's garbage, it should have never been
> released.
>
> --
> Jerry McGuire: Help me, help you...
> :-)
>
Holz,

Yes, you are correct inasmuch as it's bad, it stinks and it's garbage
only for those who are incapable of understanding how to use it and/or
unwilling to learn how to use it.

C.B.


--
It is the responsibility and duty of everyone to help the underprivileged
and unfortunate among us.