Hello Everyone,

We're running SBS 2003 internally and we have several Internet
domain names forwarded to 2 web sites being hosted by a web hosting
company on our behalf. All employee email accounts are hosted at the
aforementioned web hosting company's mail servers.
All employees' email programs are configured to retrieve email and
send mail using POP3/SMTP from the web hosting company's respective
server addresses and ports.
Can I setup Exchange as included with SBS 2003 for employees to
have a shared calendar, shared address book, etc. without affecting the
email addresses and domain names currently in use? Are there any
caveats to doing this, especially considering most workstations are
WinXP SP2 and one owner's laptop is Vista Business (Outlook 2K/2003 vs
Windows Vista Mail)? Do we need to standardize and force everyone to
run the same version of Outlook?

Notes:
It is a small (<10 employees) family-owned office with 2 members of
the same family operating 2 different businesses with 2 different names,
2 different domain names (FQDNs), and 2 different email address name
pools, but sharing 1 network, server, etc. That is one of the reasons
why we decided to host Web sites and email off site. But now, they want
a shared calendar (for appointments, etc.), etc. Please Help!

Thanks,
Fred
<><

Re: Complicated Exchange Question. Please Un-complicate Me. by Lanwench

Lanwench
Tue May 13 13:17:23 PDT 2008

F3 <f3_evans@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Hello Everyone,
>
> We're running SBS 2003 internally and we have several Internet
> domain names forwarded to 2 web sites being hosted by a web hosting
> company on our behalf. All employee email accounts are hosted at the
> aforementioned web hosting company's mail servers.
> All employees' email programs are configured to retrieve email and
> send mail using POP3/SMTP from the web hosting company's respective
> server addresses and ports.
> Can I setup Exchange as included with SBS 2003 for employees to
> have a shared calendar, shared address book, etc. without affecting
> the email addresses and domain names currently in use?

No, not really. You really don't want to mix Internet mail & Exchange in the
same mail profile.

> Are there any
> caveats to doing this, especially considering most workstations are
> WinXP SP2 and one owner's laptop is Vista Business (Outlook 2K/2003 vs
> Windows Vista Mail)?

That doesn't matter - you can simply install Outlook 2003 on everyone's
computer. It should be there already if you joined the domain the "SBS
way" - using the /connectcomputer wizard.

> Do we need to standardize and force everyone to
> run the same version of Outlook?

Yes, if you really want things to work properly and give everyone access to
all the features.
>
> Notes:
> It is a small (<10 employees) family-owned office with 2 members
> of the same family operating 2 different businesses with 2 different
> names, 2 different domain names (FQDNs), and 2 different email
> address name pools, but sharing 1 network, server, etc. That is one
> of the reasons why we decided to host Web sites and email off site. But
> now, they want a shared calendar (for appointments, etc.), etc. Please
> Help!
> Thanks,
> Fred
> <><

The best bet is to stop using the hosting company for mail. There is no
benefit to doing this. Bite the bullet and host your domain(s) mail directly
on the server, the way the deities intended. You and your users will *all*
appreciate the features they get with this at the end of the day.

See http://www.msexchange.org/tutorials/MF002.html for info on how hosting
your own mail works...since you're using SBS, though, you configure the
server side using the CEICW.
http://www.msexchange.org/tutorials/MF010.html explains how you host for
additional domains

Don't be afraid of Exchange...and don't go for a mix 'n match configuration
in the belief that it will be easier, because it won't.




Re: Complicated Exchange Question. Please Un-complicate Me. by Buck

Buck
Tue May 13 17:14:42 PDT 2008


On Tue, 13 May 2008 16:17:23 -0400, "Lanwench [MVP - Exchange]"
<lanwench@heybuddy.donotsendme.unsolicitedmailatyahoo.com> wrote:

>F3 <f3_evans@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> Hello Everyone,
>>
>> We're running SBS 2003 internally and we have several Internet
>> domain names forwarded to 2 web sites being hosted by a web hosting
>> company on our behalf. All employee email accounts are hosted at the
>> aforementioned web hosting company's mail servers.
>> All employees' email programs are configured to retrieve email and
>> send mail using POP3/SMTP from the web hosting company's respective
>> server addresses and ports.
>> Can I setup Exchange as included with SBS 2003 for employees to
>> have a shared calendar, shared address book, etc. without affecting
>> the email addresses and domain names currently in use?
>
>No, not really. You really don't want to mix Internet mail & Exchange in the
>same mail profile.
>
>> Are there any
>> caveats to doing this, especially considering most workstations are
>> WinXP SP2 and one owner's laptop is Vista Business (Outlook 2K/2003 vs
>> Windows Vista Mail)?
>
>That doesn't matter - you can simply install Outlook 2003 on everyone's
>computer. It should be there already if you joined the domain the "SBS
>way" - using the /connectcomputer wizard.
>
>> Do we need to standardize and force everyone to
>> run the same version of Outlook?
>
>Yes, if you really want things to work properly and give everyone access to
>all the features.
>>
>> Notes:
>> It is a small (<10 employees) family-owned office with 2 members
>> of the same family operating 2 different businesses with 2 different
>> names, 2 different domain names (FQDNs), and 2 different email
>> address name pools, but sharing 1 network, server, etc. That is one
>> of the reasons why we decided to host Web sites and email off site. But
>> now, they want a shared calendar (for appointments, etc.), etc. Please
>> Help!
>> Thanks,
>> Fred
>> <><
>
>The best bet is to stop using the hosting company for mail. There is no
>benefit to doing this. Bite the bullet and host your domain(s) mail directly
>on the server, the way the deities intended. You and your users will *all*
>appreciate the features they get with this at the end of the day.
>
>See http://www.msexchange.org/tutorials/MF002.html for info on how hosting
>your own mail works...since you're using SBS, though, you configure the
>server side using the CEICW.
>http://www.msexchange.org/tutorials/MF010.html explains how you host for
>additional domains
>
>Don't be afraid of Exchange...and don't go for a mix 'n match configuration
>in the belief that it will be easier, because it won't.
>
>
Lanwench,

This is OT, however I want to say your constant info and insight has
helped me tremendously to effectively implement and maintain the SBS
2003's I'm taking care of for my customers.

Thank You,

Buck

Re: Complicated Exchange Question. Please Un-complicate Me. by Lanwench

Lanwench
Wed May 14 06:14:30 PDT 2008

Buck Rogers <buck@rogers.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 13 May 2008 16:17:23 -0400, "Lanwench [MVP - Exchange]"
> <lanwench@heybuddy.donotsendme.unsolicitedmailatyahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> F3 <f3_evans@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hello Everyone,
>>>
>>> We're running SBS 2003 internally and we have several Internet
>>> domain names forwarded to 2 web sites being hosted by a web hosting
>>> company on our behalf. All employee email accounts are hosted at
>>> the aforementioned web hosting company's mail servers.
>>> All employees' email programs are configured to retrieve email
>>> and send mail using POP3/SMTP from the web hosting company's
>>> respective server addresses and ports.
>>> Can I setup Exchange as included with SBS 2003 for employees to
>>> have a shared calendar, shared address book, etc. without affecting
>>> the email addresses and domain names currently in use?
>>
>> No, not really. You really don't want to mix Internet mail &
>> Exchange in the same mail profile.
>>
>>> Are there any
>>> caveats to doing this, especially considering most workstations are
>>> WinXP SP2 and one owner's laptop is Vista Business (Outlook 2K/2003
>>> vs Windows Vista Mail)?
>>
>> That doesn't matter - you can simply install Outlook 2003 on
>> everyone's computer. It should be there already if you joined the
>> domain the "SBS
>> way" - using the /connectcomputer wizard.
>>
>>> Do we need to standardize and force everyone to
>>> run the same version of Outlook?
>>
>> Yes, if you really want things to work properly and give everyone
>> access to all the features.
>>>
>>> Notes:
>>> It is a small (<10 employees) family-owned office with 2 members
>>> of the same family operating 2 different businesses with 2 different
>>> names, 2 different domain names (FQDNs), and 2 different email
>>> address name pools, but sharing 1 network, server, etc. That is one
>>> of the reasons why we decided to host Web sites and email off site.
>>> But now, they want a shared calendar (for appointments, etc.), etc.
>>> Please Help!
>>> Thanks,
>>> Fred
>>> <><
>>
>> The best bet is to stop using the hosting company for mail. There is
>> no benefit to doing this. Bite the bullet and host your domain(s)
>> mail directly on the server, the way the deities intended. You and
>> your users will *all* appreciate the features they get with this at
>> the end of the day.
>>
>> See http://www.msexchange.org/tutorials/MF002.html for info on how
>> hosting your own mail works...since you're using SBS, though, you
>> configure the server side using the CEICW.
>> http://www.msexchange.org/tutorials/MF010.html explains how you host
>> for additional domains
>>
>> Don't be afraid of Exchange...and don't go for a mix 'n match
>> configuration in the belief that it will be easier, because it won't.
>>
>>
> Lanwench,
>
> This is OT, however I want to say your constant info and insight has
> helped me tremendously to effectively implement and maintain the SBS
> 2003's I'm taking care of for my customers.
>
> Thank You,
>
> Buck

Why, thank you, Buck. I really appreciate the nice feedback! :-)