HTC Touch Audio Manager

Hello

I have an HTC Touch and when I play my albums, for some reason it seems to
play them in alphabetical order, instead of the original order, to ensure
this, I even copied the tracks, so the filenames would be in the original
order - but for some reason it uses the track name to sort the order of
play - has anyone else noticed this, or do I need to adjust some setting?

Kind regards

Ricky

Thomas
Sat Apr 05 01:03:41 PDT 2008

RickyP,

> has anyone else noticed this, or do I need to adjust some setting?
>

Absolutely I have noticed that. Makes that software a useless piece of
sh*t whose developers never ever listened to music on a portable
device.

--
Thomas Borchert, Sat, 05 Apr 2008 10:02 +0200

RickyP
Sat Apr 05 02:12:28 PDT 2008

May have to revert yo WMP in that case, shame, because it's nice
interface...

"Thomas Borchert" <borchert_thomas@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:VA.0000783f.0040d932@hotmail.com...
> RickyP,
>
>> has anyone else noticed this, or do I need to adjust some setting?
>>
>
> Absolutely I have noticed that. Makes that software a useless piece of
> sh*t whose developers never ever listened to music on a portable
> device.
>
> --
> Thomas Borchert, Sat, 05 Apr 2008 10:02 +0200
>

Jeff
Sat Apr 05 05:40:40 PDT 2008

I hate that interface,
WMP is way better

"RickyP" <ricky@msn.com> wrote in message
news:14FDF25C-9828-4788-AF9E-A48C0298F63F@microsoft.com...
> May have to revert yo WMP in that case, shame, because it's nice
> interface...
>
> "Thomas Borchert" <borchert_thomas@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:VA.0000783f.0040d932@hotmail.com...
>> RickyP,
>>
>>> has anyone else noticed this, or do I need to adjust some setting?
>>>
>>
>> Absolutely I have noticed that. Makes that software a useless piece of
>> sh*t whose developers never ever listened to music on a portable
>> device.
>>
>> --
>> Thomas Borchert, Sat, 05 Apr 2008 10:02 +0200
>>
>

RickyP
Sat Apr 05 06:07:47 PDT 2008

however I heard that WMP has a larger memory footprint?

"Jeff" <S.Cerevisiae@hmm.edu> wrote in message
news:OD2zDpxlIHA.1280@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>I hate that interface,
> WMP is way better
>
> "RickyP" <ricky@msn.com> wrote in message
> news:14FDF25C-9828-4788-AF9E-A48C0298F63F@microsoft.com...
>> May have to revert yo WMP in that case, shame, because it's nice
>> interface...
>>
>> "Thomas Borchert" <borchert_thomas@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:VA.0000783f.0040d932@hotmail.com...
>>> RickyP,
>>>
>>>> has anyone else noticed this, or do I need to adjust some setting?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Absolutely I have noticed that. Makes that software a useless piece of
>>> sh*t whose developers never ever listened to music on a portable
>>> device.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Thomas Borchert, Sat, 05 Apr 2008 10:02 +0200
>>>
>>
>

Roger
Sat Apr 05 06:34:32 PDT 2008


"RickyP" <ricky@msn.com> wrote in message
news:BCCF7388-04F0-4C7F-8F69-07C0459D6043@microsoft.com...
> however I heard that WMP has a larger memory footprint?

WMP does not interfer with other programs I use at the same time so I have
found no reason to quit using WMP. I wish I could say that about other
Microsoft products though.

BTW here is a neat site that makes use of WMP.
http://www.thestreamcenter.com/pda/

Werner
Tue Apr 08 06:18:26 PDT 2008

Not that much when playing back audio.

Nevertheless, it has quite high CPU usage and a lot of other disadvantages.
You may want to check out my multimedia-related roundups for a more thorough
elaboration on alternative, WAY better players like Coreplayer, TCPMP or
even iPlay.

--


--
Werner "Menneisyys" Ruotsalainen - Microsoft MVP - Windows - Mobile Devices
Please see the Pocket PC Mag Expert Blog (including mine) at
http://www.pocketpcmag.com/blogs/ - you will definitely like it.


"RickyP" <ricky@msn.com> wrote in message
news:BCCF7388-04F0-4C7F-8F69-07C0459D6043@microsoft.com...
> however I heard that WMP has a larger memory footprint?
>
> "Jeff" <S.Cerevisiae@hmm.edu> wrote in message
> news:OD2zDpxlIHA.1280@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>>I hate that interface,
>> WMP is way better
>>
>> "RickyP" <ricky@msn.com> wrote in message
>> news:14FDF25C-9828-4788-AF9E-A48C0298F63F@microsoft.com...
>>> May have to revert yo WMP in that case, shame, because it's nice
>>> interface...
>>>
>>> "Thomas Borchert" <borchert_thomas@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:VA.0000783f.0040d932@hotmail.com...
>>>> RickyP,
>>>>
>>>>> has anyone else noticed this, or do I need to adjust some setting?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Absolutely I have noticed that. Makes that software a useless piece of
>>>> sh*t whose developers never ever listened to music on a portable
>>>> device.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Thomas Borchert, Sat, 05 Apr 2008 10:02 +0200
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

RickyP
Tue Apr 08 11:36:25 PDT 2008

Hello Werner

Thanks for your post, will check your site out.
"Werner "Menneisyys" Ruotsalainen [MVP - Windows - Mobile Devices]"
<!ei.maileja@kiitos!> wrote in message
news:u2NBcsXmIHA.4208@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
> Not that much when playing back audio.
>
> Nevertheless, it has quite high CPU usage and a lot of other
> disadvantages. You may want to check out my multimedia-related roundups
> for a more thorough elaboration on alternative, WAY better players like
> Coreplayer, TCPMP or even iPlay.
>
> --
>
>
> --
> Werner "Menneisyys" Ruotsalainen - Microsoft MVP - Windows - Mobile
> Devices
> Please see the Pocket PC Mag Expert Blog (including mine) at
> http://www.pocketpcmag.com/blogs/ - you will definitely like it.
>
>
> "RickyP" <ricky@msn.com> wrote in message
> news:BCCF7388-04F0-4C7F-8F69-07C0459D6043@microsoft.com...
>> however I heard that WMP has a larger memory footprint?
>>
>> "Jeff" <S.Cerevisiae@hmm.edu> wrote in message
>> news:OD2zDpxlIHA.1280@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>>>I hate that interface,
>>> WMP is way better
>>>
>>> "RickyP" <ricky@msn.com> wrote in message
>>> news:14FDF25C-9828-4788-AF9E-A48C0298F63F@microsoft.com...
>>>> May have to revert yo WMP in that case, shame, because it's nice
>>>> interface...
>>>>
>>>> "Thomas Borchert" <borchert_thomas@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:VA.0000783f.0040d932@hotmail.com...
>>>>> RickyP,
>>>>>
>>>>>> has anyone else noticed this, or do I need to adjust some setting?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Absolutely I have noticed that. Makes that software a useless piece of
>>>>> sh*t whose developers never ever listened to music on a portable
>>>>> device.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Thomas Borchert, Sat, 05 Apr 2008 10:02 +0200
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>

RickyP
Tue Apr 08 11:36:46 PDT 2008

Hello Werner

Thanks for your post, will check your site out. Byt he way, what your site
address?

Kind regards

Ricky

"Werner "Menneisyys" Ruotsalainen [MVP - Windows - Mobile Devices]"
<!ei.maileja@kiitos!> wrote in message
news:u2NBcsXmIHA.4208@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
> Not that much when playing back audio.
>
> Nevertheless, it has quite high CPU usage and a lot of other
> disadvantages. You may want to check out my multimedia-related roundups
> for a more thorough elaboration on alternative, WAY better players like
> Coreplayer, TCPMP or even iPlay.
>
> --
>
>
> --
> Werner "Menneisyys" Ruotsalainen - Microsoft MVP - Windows - Mobile
> Devices
> Please see the Pocket PC Mag Expert Blog (including mine) at
> http://www.pocketpcmag.com/blogs/ - you will definitely like it.
>
>
> "RickyP" <ricky@msn.com> wrote in message
> news:BCCF7388-04F0-4C7F-8F69-07C0459D6043@microsoft.com...
>> however I heard that WMP has a larger memory footprint?
>>
>> "Jeff" <S.Cerevisiae@hmm.edu> wrote in message
>> news:OD2zDpxlIHA.1280@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>>>I hate that interface,
>>> WMP is way better
>>>
>>> "RickyP" <ricky@msn.com> wrote in message
>>> news:14FDF25C-9828-4788-AF9E-A48C0298F63F@microsoft.com...
>>>> May have to revert yo WMP in that case, shame, because it's nice
>>>> interface...
>>>>
>>>> "Thomas Borchert" <borchert_thomas@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:VA.0000783f.0040d932@hotmail.com...
>>>>> RickyP,
>>>>>
>>>>>> has anyone else noticed this, or do I need to adjust some setting?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Absolutely I have noticed that. Makes that software a useless piece of
>>>>> sh*t whose developers never ever listened to music on a portable
>>>>> device.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Thomas Borchert, Sat, 05 Apr 2008 10:02 +0200
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>

Roger
Wed Apr 09 08:56:20 PDT 2008


"Werner "Menneisyys" Ruotsalainen [MVP - Windows - Mobile Devices]"
<!ei.maileja@kiitos!> wrote in message
news:u2NBcsXmIHA.4208@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
> Not that much when playing back audio.
>
> Nevertheless, it has quite high CPU usage and a lot of other
disadvantages.
> You may want to check out my multimedia-related roundups for a more
thorough
> elaboration on alternative, WAY better players like Coreplayer, TCPMP or
> even iPlay.

Do you have any recomendations for a player that does streaming mp3s? If
you want to see if a player can play steaming mp3s there are a links to
steaming mp3s at:
http://www.thestreamcenter.com/pda/?state=PA

Thanks

RickyP
Tue Apr 08 11:36:51 PDT 2008

Hello Werner

Thanks for your post, will check your site out. Byt he way, what your site
address?

Kind regards

Ricky

"Werner "Menneisyys" Ruotsalainen [MVP - Windows - Mobile Devices]"
<!ei.maileja@kiitos!> wrote in message
news:u2NBcsXmIHA.4208@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
> Not that much when playing back audio.
>
> Nevertheless, it has quite high CPU usage and a lot of other
> disadvantages. You may want to check out my multimedia-related roundups
> for a more thorough elaboration on alternative, WAY better players like
> Coreplayer, TCPMP or even iPlay.
>
> --
>
>
> --
> Werner "Menneisyys" Ruotsalainen - Microsoft MVP - Windows - Mobile
> Devices
> Please see the Pocket PC Mag Expert Blog (including mine) at
> http://www.pocketpcmag.com/blogs/ - you will definitely like it.
>
>
> "RickyP" <ricky@msn.com> wrote in message
> news:BCCF7388-04F0-4C7F-8F69-07C0459D6043@microsoft.com...
>> however I heard that WMP has a larger memory footprint?
>>
>> "Jeff" <S.Cerevisiae@hmm.edu> wrote in message
>> news:OD2zDpxlIHA.1280@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>>>I hate that interface,
>>> WMP is way better
>>>
>>> "RickyP" <ricky@msn.com> wrote in message
>>> news:14FDF25C-9828-4788-AF9E-A48C0298F63F@microsoft.com...
>>>> May have to revert yo WMP in that case, shame, because it's nice
>>>> interface...
>>>>
>>>> "Thomas Borchert" <borchert_thomas@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:VA.0000783f.0040d932@hotmail.com...
>>>>> RickyP,
>>>>>
>>>>>> has anyone else noticed this, or do I need to adjust some setting?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Absolutely I have noticed that. Makes that software a useless piece of
>>>>> sh*t whose developers never ever listened to music on a portable
>>>>> device.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Thomas Borchert, Sat, 05 Apr 2008 10:02 +0200
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>

Werner
Thu Apr 10 01:47:57 PDT 2008

There are a lot of them; see my Radio / Streaming Bibles.

--


--
Werner "Menneisyys" Ruotsalainen - Microsoft MVP - Windows - Mobile Devices
Please see the Pocket PC Mag Expert Blog (including mine) at
http://www.pocketpcmag.com/blogs/ - you will definitely like it.


"Roger 2008" <rwpcs@att.net> wrote in message
news:WeCdnXRQKJS5emHanZ2dnUVZ_oOnnZ2d@giganews.com...
>
> "Werner "Menneisyys" Ruotsalainen [MVP - Windows - Mobile Devices]"
> <!ei.maileja@kiitos!> wrote in message
> news:u2NBcsXmIHA.4208@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>> Not that much when playing back audio.
>>
>> Nevertheless, it has quite high CPU usage and a lot of other
> disadvantages.
>> You may want to check out my multimedia-related roundups for a more
> thorough
>> elaboration on alternative, WAY better players like Coreplayer, TCPMP or
>> even iPlay.
>
> Do you have any recomendations for a player that does streaming mp3s? If
> you want to see if a player can play steaming mp3s there are a links to
> steaming mp3s at:
> http://www.thestreamcenter.com/pda/?state=PA
>
> Thanks
>
>

Werner
Thu Apr 10 02:11:06 PDT 2008

See my sig

--


--
Werner "Menneisyys" Ruotsalainen - Microsoft MVP - Windows - Mobile Devices
Please see the Pocket PC Mag Expert Blog (including mine) at
http://www.pocketpcmag.com/blogs/ - you will definitely like it.


"RickyP" <ricky@msn.com> wrote in message
news:%23tO6NKomIHA.1052@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
> Hello Werner
>
> Thanks for your post, will check your site out. Byt he way, what your
> site
> address?
>
> Kind regards
>
> Ricky
>
> "Werner "Menneisyys" Ruotsalainen [MVP - Windows - Mobile Devices]"
> <!ei.maileja@kiitos!> wrote in message
> news:u2NBcsXmIHA.4208@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>> Not that much when playing back audio.
>>
>> Nevertheless, it has quite high CPU usage and a lot of other
>> disadvantages. You may want to check out my multimedia-related roundups
>> for a more thorough elaboration on alternative, WAY better players like
>> Coreplayer, TCPMP or even iPlay.
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>> --
>> Werner "Menneisyys" Ruotsalainen - Microsoft MVP - Windows - Mobile
>> Devices
>> Please see the Pocket PC Mag Expert Blog (including mine) at
>> http://www.pocketpcmag.com/blogs/ - you will definitely like it.
>>
>>
>> "RickyP" <ricky@msn.com> wrote in message
>> news:BCCF7388-04F0-4C7F-8F69-07C0459D6043@microsoft.com...
>>> however I heard that WMP has a larger memory footprint?
>>>
>>> "Jeff" <S.Cerevisiae@hmm.edu> wrote in message
>>> news:OD2zDpxlIHA.1280@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>>>>I hate that interface,
>>>> WMP is way better
>>>>
>>>> "RickyP" <ricky@msn.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:14FDF25C-9828-4788-AF9E-A48C0298F63F@microsoft.com...
>>>>> May have to revert yo WMP in that case, shame, because it's nice
>>>>> interface...
>>>>>
>>>>> "Thomas Borchert" <borchert_thomas@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:VA.0000783f.0040d932@hotmail.com...
>>>>>> RickyP,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> has anyone else noticed this, or do I need to adjust some setting?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Absolutely I have noticed that. Makes that software a useless piece
>>>>>> of
>>>>>> sh*t whose developers never ever listened to music on a portable
>>>>>> device.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Thomas Borchert, Sat, 05 Apr 2008 10:02 +0200
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>