IPSM on WinCE 5.0 ?

Hi all,

is anyone able to run the IPSM on WinCE5.0 ?
We have IPSM 3.7 Gold and PXA270, but are always getting the following error:
"PSMFSD_MountDisk: FG_Init failed! status=bc"

Intel Premier support wasn't much helpful, just said that although v3.7
supports complete PXA family (including PXA27x), but doesn't support CE5.0.
This might be the true reason, but I just wanted to check if anyone here's
able to run it.

Thanks,
Martin

Jordan
Mon Dec 13 16:36:39 CST 2004

Hi Martin,

We have IPSM 3.7 running under WinCE5.0 on our PXA271 & PXA272 boards.

What processor are you using? I suspect the PXA27x...

If you are using the PXA27x have you implemented the flash size workaround?

It is listed in the IPSM 3.7 GOLD issues document, (Issue Tracking #: SCR
560)


Regards,
Jordan Moss

"Martin Malik" <mmalik {_at_} gotive.com> wrote in message
news:376343C3-1238-4FA9-AD5E-73CDCC3588D1@microsoft.com...
> Hi all,
>
> is anyone able to run the IPSM on WinCE5.0 ?
> We have IPSM 3.7 Gold and PXA270, but are always getting the following
> error:
> "PSMFSD_MountDisk: FG_Init failed! status=bc"
>
> Intel Premier support wasn't much helpful, just said that although v3.7
> supports complete PXA family (including PXA27x), but doesn't support
> CE5.0.
> This might be the true reason, but I just wanted to check if anyone here's
> able to run it.
>
> Thanks,
> Martin

mmalik
Tue Dec 14 03:29:01 CST 2004

Hello Jordan,

thanks for your response.
Yes, we do have the PXA270 C0 Stepping CPU.
We're currently using a L30T flash (top) and the document says that the
erratum affects only "bottom boot" type of flashes. Anyway, I have already
tried to implement this workaround, but without success.

Regards,
Martin

"Jordan Moss" wrote:

> Hi Martin,
>
> We have IPSM 3.7 running under WinCE5.0 on our PXA271 & PXA272 boards.
>
> What processor are you using? I suspect the PXA27x...
>
> If you are using the PXA27x have you implemented the flash size workaround?
>
> It is listed in the IPSM 3.7 GOLD issues document, (Issue Tracking #: SCR
> 560)
>
>
> Regards,
> Jordan Moss
>
> "Martin Malik" <mmalik {_at_} gotive.com> wrote in message
> news:376343C3-1238-4FA9-AD5E-73CDCC3588D1@microsoft.com...
> > Hi all,
> >
> > is anyone able to run the IPSM on WinCE5.0 ?
> > We have IPSM 3.7 Gold and PXA270, but are always getting the following
> > error:
> > "PSMFSD_MountDisk: FG_Init failed! status=bc"
> >
> > Intel Premier support wasn't much helpful, just said that although v3.7
> > supports complete PXA family (including PXA27x), but doesn't support
> > CE5.0.
> > This might be the true reason, but I just wanted to check if anyone here's
> > able to run it.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Martin
>
>
>

mmalik
Tue Dec 14 06:13:01 CST 2004

It seems I was abke to fix it.
I decreased the ManagedAreaLength in order to skip the boot blocks at the top.

"Martin Malik" wrote:

> Hello Jordan,
>
> thanks for your response.
> Yes, we do have the PXA270 C0 Stepping CPU.
> We're currently using a L30T flash (top) and the document says that the
> erratum affects only "bottom boot" type of flashes. Anyway, I have already
> tried to implement this workaround, but without success.
>
> Regards,
> Martin
>
> "Jordan Moss" wrote:
>
> > Hi Martin,
> >
> > We have IPSM 3.7 running under WinCE5.0 on our PXA271 & PXA272 boards.
> >
> > What processor are you using? I suspect the PXA27x...
> >
> > If you are using the PXA27x have you implemented the flash size workaround?
> >
> > It is listed in the IPSM 3.7 GOLD issues document, (Issue Tracking #: SCR
> > 560)
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> > Jordan Moss
> >
> > "Martin Malik" <mmalik {_at_} gotive.com> wrote in message
> > news:376343C3-1238-4FA9-AD5E-73CDCC3588D1@microsoft.com...
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > is anyone able to run the IPSM on WinCE5.0 ?
> > > We have IPSM 3.7 Gold and PXA270, but are always getting the following
> > > error:
> > > "PSMFSD_MountDisk: FG_Init failed! status=bc"
> > >
> > > Intel Premier support wasn't much helpful, just said that although v3.7
> > > supports complete PXA family (including PXA27x), but doesn't support
> > > CE5.0.
> > > This might be the true reason, but I just wanted to check if anyone here's
> > > able to run it.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Martin
> >
> >
> >