GetTickCount in debug builds

Tutorials Win: Microsoft Windows Forum

- Previous
  - 1
    - media player error Hello everyone, I am using x86 based board, having 82855gme controller(wince 6.0), I am using Intel IGD display driver. I couldnt able to play video file using this display driver. I tried with everything same but only changed display driver to VGA Linear flatframebuffer, after changing it i could able to play the video file. I dont have source code for IGD display(only having the dll), i need to use only this display driver only since it has other supports. With igd display if i try to play a file it opens windows media player and it closed suddenly. My question is Why i couldnt able to play the video file with igd driver? And what can be done to overcome it. Here is my retail message(i think it is sufficient) the last few lines after the ***** is when i tried to play the video file. Thanks, Sankarraj Microsoft Windows CE BIOS Bootloader Version 2.3 (Built Apr 4 2005)INFO: code=0x4. INFO: code=0x4. INFO: code=0x4. Jumping to image (address=0x224B10) Debug Serial Init SysInit: GDTBase=81568000 IDTBase=815723a0 KData=8156d800 Windows CE Kernel for i486 Built on Feb 6 2007 at 14:57:31 INFO:OALLogSetZones: dpCurSettings.ulZoneMask: 0xb RTC - Status Reg B - 0x02 X86Init done, OEMAddressTable = 80224b30, RAM mapped = 04000000. Override Serial Driver: No COM port selected for serial KITL transport, no override necessary. Error! ST0=70 T=0 ICHAC97: Installed ISR handler, Dll = 'giisr.dll', Handler = 'ISRHandler', Irq = 5, PhysAddr = 0xdc00 Error! ST0=70 T=0 Error! ST0=70 T=0 Error! ST0=70 T=0 ******************** Exception 'Access Violation' (14): Thread-Id=05f9000e(pth=82f055ec), Proc-Id=00400002(pprc=8156f800) 'NK.EXE', VM-active=05e6000e(pprc=82ed2b58) 'ceplayer.exe' PC=c01322bb(gwes.dll+0x000522bb) RA=00000000(???+0x00000000) SP=e175f858, BVA=00000000 Exception 'Raised Exception' (-1): Thread-Id=05f9000e(pth=82f055ec), Proc-Id=00400002(pprc=8156f800) 'NK.EXE', VM-active=05e6000e(pprc=82ed2b58) 'ceplayer.exe' PC=c0033907(k.coredll.dll+0x00013907) RA=c0033957(k.coredll.dll+0x00013957) SP=e175f2d4, BVA=ffffffff Tag: GetTickCount in debug builds Tag: 101467
  - 2
    - MI5 Persecution: Goldfish and Piranha 29/9/95 (5613) I just thought I'd let you know what I've been reading into the "Crusader" spam. I don't want to post this to usenet because somebody might try to tie that in to my posts in some way (someone already has, in uk.misc). First of all, I'd like to ask you to believe that my phone line in my apartment is bugged, and has been for many months. I have moved a couple of times this year, but "they" have faithfully been on my trail. Anyway, let's suppose my phone line is bugged. Now, when I talk to my internet service provider, it's over a SLIP (now PPP) connection. So if you wanted to bug what was said, either you'd listen in over the line and have to decode the transmission, or you could go to the service provider (more difficult) and ask them to decode a particular user's connection. OK, so now they're listening to everything I do over my SLIP/PPP connection. A couple of months ago I was messing around with faking articles through nntp servers and through anonymous remailers. I chose a nice inconspicuous newsgroup for my little tests, something no-one would ever notice. Guess which newsgroup I chose??? Yes, _FISH_!!! or rec.aquaria to be precise And guess what articles I tried to post? Goldfish, Koi carp and, you'll never guess... PIRANHA!!! The goldfish article and the Koi went through, but the piranha didn';t appear. by now you probably think this is too silly for words. But if you look in the papers a few eeks ago you will find John Major, Tonny Blair and Paddy Ashdown sharing a "private joke" about Major's sunburnt goldfish. We haven't had anything about Koi yet (they must be too dull ). Now, sent by someone who clearly knew what they were doing (they chose an Italian backbone site for their launch point) we have many thousands of messages to people all over the globe. All about piranha, and with the punchline "that gives you something to think about, doesn't it?" The way it works is that they're trying to kill two birds with one stone again. I don't knoiw why they should be against these national alliance people, but my interpretation is that they simultaneously try to discredit them, and stem the flow of Corley articles. ================================================================= In article <DFnE55.8tF.0.bloor@torfree.net>, Mike Corley <bu765@torfree.net> wrote: > >John J Smith (J.J.Smith@ftel.co.uk) wrote: > >: b) we do know who you are. Or are you someone else we don't know about? >: You are currently known as "That bloody persistant net nutter, who's >: expanding from uk.misc to the rest of the world". > >I think the point I was trying to make is that I could tell you things >from my personal life, at home and at work, which would add credibility >to my story. But if I named people, then (a) they would object violently >to being included in this shenanigans, and (b) I would be revealing my >identity which would be bad for my personal life and my work life. Of >course some people in my personal life, and at work, do know who "mike >corley" is. But at least we're observing a studied silence for now. :People can always be called "MR X", to save them being named. : :I'm completely perplexed as to what you mean by b). Revealing identity? :To who? And why would this be bad for any part of your life when you :already have a less than respectful reputation here? I'll just enumerate one or two things that I can still remember. Sometime around August/Sept 1992 I was living in a house in Oxford, and coming out of the house was physically attacked by someone - not punched, just grabbed by the coat, with some verbals thrown in for good measure. That was something the people at work shouldn't have known about... but soon after a couple of people were talking right in front of me about, "yeah, I heard he was attacked". Again, one I went for a walk in some woods outside Oxford. The next day, at work, someone said "you know he went to the forest yesterday". I don't want to put details on usenet of what happened because to do so would be to risk it happening again. If you put ideas in peoples' heads then you can find them reflecting back at you, and I don't want that. Also I can't remember that much from three years ago. From november 1992 I started taking "major tranquilizers" and just blotted the whole thing from my mind. >This is a feature time and time again, that the security services >(presumed) get at you by manipulating other people around you to get at >you. If you have their contacts, manpower, resources and technology then >you can do that sort of thing. :But why? Are you a threat? They pretend they "have" to get at me. After the first few weeks they had to find a reason to spy and abuse. You can't abuse someone unless they're in the wrong in some way. What I did "wrong" was to be ill. So it became "nutter" and "monster" and "he's going to attack us" coupled with "ha ha ha, he can't do anything to defend himself, it was so funny". That obvious contradiction within their propaganda is something they blithely ignore. :So, the Security Services never *actually* appear, and you assume that :they get someone else to do your dirty work. This is a bit of a big :logical step, here: That person doesn't like me, or is causing me trouble, :it's not because they've got problems themselves, it must be the "Security :Services". Yes. Because people are infallible. Or is there more? A single source is indicated because of the range of harassment. BBC + Capital + manipulated_public_at_large + set_up_situations, what does that add up to? Add in the technology to carry out the covert spying and the manpower and knowhow to follow you around for five years without being spotted. It smells very much of the security services, because there is no other organization (to my knowledge) which does the things I've seen these people do. Remember, they have deliberately chosen the softest of soft targets to victimize. They purposely chose a mentally ill person who they thought would be likely to kill himself anyway, so that they could get away with murder. And in all likelihood it will have started as a personal vendetta by someone. Who could that be? I don't know, but I can give you some clues. The first possibility (deep breath) is that someone from my college set me up. Six years ago I graduated from university in the UK, during the last year there I was steadily getting more and more ill. I know that I was talking in my sleep; although I don't know what I was saying, it got me a reputation, and if someone from my college talked afterwards to the "wrong" people then that could be the reason for all that has followed. I think that's the strongest contender for source. Directly beneath my room lived another bloke who frequently had his friends round late at night, after the time that I went to sleep. So they could have heard what I was saying in my sleep, and that could have got me the reputation for "talking to myself". What I don't know is why that should have rebounded a year after I left. You'd think it would have happened sooner; it's a bit odd to wait for a year and then start abuse. That leads me to question what in particular happened around May/June 1990 for them to start then. >What I don't know is how it looks from the other side, from the side of >the people who are being manipulated to get at me. On a couple of >occasions I have challenged people to tell the truth of the matter, but >they have alwats ducked the challenge. :Have you ever considered the possibility, that you have made a mistake, and :the people don't know what you are talking about? Yes. I am currently considering the possibility that some people around me know only what is being posted on Usenet, and have not been "contacted" by "them". But I _know_ that others have been contacted. :What words? Are they in common use? Could they be a catchphrase of a :popular comedian?: "Nice to see you, to see you nice"? In England the all-time No. 1 is "nutter". Easter this year, returning home from Clapham police station to report five years of harassment ("we're not saying it's happening and we're not saying it isn't happening"), another "not happening" incident of harassment when a cowardly little slut did her country proud by yelling "nutter, nutter, nutter" in the face of the hated enemy. What can you do about that? You can't yell abuse back in their face, because they know they're supported by their peers, by the media, by the murderers in the security forces. You can't put them down when the fascist establishment is on their side. You can't hit them, because they would deny their abuse, they would deny knowing anything, and bring charges against the "nutter" who attacked them "at random". >You know, you're >passing saomeone, they're hardly going to construct an argument for your >benefit, so they work a word of abuse into the conversation which they >can giggle at. :Abuse such as what? We're all adults here, we can take it. Is this abuse :aimed at you? How can you tell it is? I think I've said already what the words are. Thing is, at any given time the language is consistent. In January everyone's calling you X, then a few weeks later people stop calling you X and start calling you Y. You can tell it's aimed at me, because when people repeatedly say the same words are you walk past, then laugh, you would have to be hard of understanding not to recognize it. >Or they repeat something that's been said somewhere else... the PE thing >being a case in point. PE says it, then other people pick up the refrain. :Remind me who PE is again. PE = "Private Eye" >: >To give you an example, which I mentioned in another posting. In around >: >October 1992, Private Eye ran a cover with the heading "Major's support >: >lowest ever", with John calling to Norma on the cover "come back, Norma". >: >Only one obvious interpretation to that, isn';;t there? I certainly >: >thought so when I saw that cover. Wrongo!! Down the pub with people from work >: >Simon says to phil, "don';t you think it's wrong then?" phil says, "well >: >private eye are usuallyright"..."hislop strikes again.. > >: Erm. Mike? Heeeelllllooo? What are you on about. What is the other >: interpretation then? Norma having an affair? Seems a bit wrong, with the >: heading "Majors support Lowest ever"... > >No, this one isn't obvious , it really does need to be explained. I >certainly didn't understand it when I first saw it. You see, the kernel >of vitriol is in the words "come back". At the time, the themes of >abuse were centred around interpretations of those two words (stretch your >mind a little bit, I don't have to spell it out for you, surely). :You did in your mail item. : :You seem to be scouting about something called a "Double Entendre". The :inference being "Come" = Ejaculation, "Back" = Anus (not the first part :of the body I would have went for, I would have foolishly gone for "Back", :silly old me). : :You see to have picked a sodomy double entendre out of a Private Eye :headline. They are everywhere. The English language has much double :meaning in it, and if you put your mind to it, you could pull a double :entendre out of a randomly chosen page of the bible. So what? >The point is that when Simon pointed it out to Phil, he did recognise >what it meant after a moment's thought... and so did I... and so did the >people who repeated it several times later... so however murky it may >seem to you, that is the meaning they intended it to have... I still don't really know if the meaning was intended when that headline was written, or if it was simply "found" after the fact. The reason I think it might be the former is that I got quite a lot of abuse along the lines of "sound-alike" or "double-entendre" at work, in particularly from Steve. So "double" inevitably came to mean split-personality, "two people in one"; "back" inevitably came to mean "backside", "come" inevitably meant you-know- what, "split" (well, we'd better split now) again you can guess, "bent" (of a similar bent), the list goes on forever. These aren't "nice" double- entendres intended for comedy, they're nasty words to humiliate and cause pain. If I could turn the clock back three years then I would sue my former employers for harassment and I would almost certainly win. I had to take pills after a year of Oxford, so they wouldn't be able to lie their way out of it. Actually, I could still take them to court - the main obstacle being that three years after the fact is a bit late and much of what happened, the details that would be necessary for a case to go to court, has just been obliterated by time. : Smid ============================================== From: flames@flames.cityscape.co.uk (Peter Kr|ger) Newsgroups: uk.misc,soc.culture.british,alt.conspiracy,uk.media,uk.legal Subject: Re: Mike Corley - a (helpful) suggestion Date: Mon Oct 2 05:43:42 1995 In article <812551172snz@objmedia.demon.co.uk>, Snail <snail@objmedia.demon.co.uk> says: >Indeed, I feel that my Usenet access is censored simply because I don't want >to download groups he is partaking in, because of his behaviour. > >I wasn't that bothered, but I am starting to get seriously pissed off >with him. Which takes a lot. Hi Snail This person Corley seems quite interesting for three reasons. I put the following at the end of a post in another thread just to see if he was reading any other threads in uk.media. It seems he is probably not. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Heres an interesting little story from back in the early days of CCD technology. There was this miniature camera which was designed to fit behind the infrared receiver lens of the remote control system (just beside the IR sensor itself) the camera clocked out the data in 256 lines of 256 pixels from a Fairchild chip and fed it out, a line at a time, into the VBI within the TV set itself. The signal could be picked up remotely from a standard license detector van from where it was stripped out of the surrounding RF signal and relayed back to the TV station where it was displayed as a slowscan monochrome image in a corner of the news readers monitor. 5613 Tag: GetTickCount in debug builds Tag: 101466
  - 3
    - MI5 Persecution: Watch Out, Forger About 27/9/95 (4099) From: ray@ultimate-tech.com (Ray Dunn) Newsgroups: uk.misc,soc.culture.british Subject: Re: An apology from Mike Corley Date: Wed Sep 27 14:20:36 1995 In referenced article, David Wooding says... >Well, Mike Corley might or might not have written the apologies, but I >think not. I thought the following line both witty and imaginative. > >>>It was the razor blades stuffed down between the keys that told me. Corley himself denies posting this "apology", but I'm impressed if it is a forgery. Here's the header of my received email. It looks very genuine except for the fact that postings to newsgroups are directed through demon's mail to news gateway, which is strange. Also the message id is <m0sxbx2-000JEeC@bloor.torfree.net> which seems to be in a different format from previous Corley postings, e.g. <DFJJB3.6Ft.0.bloor@torfree.net The mail seems to have been received directly from mail.torfree.net. One way of telling for sure would be if anyone on the recipient list contacted torfree, but did not publish any complaints on the newsgroups - he would not have had access to their address in that case. >Received: from SpoolDir by ULTIMATE (Mercury 1.20); 26 Sep 95 12:00:14 +0500 >Return-path: <bu765@torfree.net> >Received: from mail.torfree.net by smtp.ultimate-tech.com (Mercury 1.20); > 26 Sep 95 12:00:04 +0500 >Received: from bloor.torfree.net ([199.71.188.18]) by mail.torfree.net > (/\==/\ Smail3.1.28.1 #28.6; 16-jun-94) > via sendmail with smtp id <m0sxbyy-000LXSC@mail.torfree.net> > for <ray@ultimate-tech.com>; Tue, 26 Sep 95 11:31 EDT >Received: from torfree.net by bloor.torfree.net with smtp > (Smail3.1.28.1 #6) id m0sxbx2-000JEeC; Tue, 26 Sep 95 11:29 EDT >Message-Id: <m0sxbx2-000JEeC@bloor.torfree.net> >Apparently-To: bu765@torfree.net, snail@objmedia.demon.co.uk, > ray@ultimate-tech.com, Frank@acclaim.demon.co.uk, > p.marshall@axion.bt.co.uk, me93jrb@brunel.ac.uk, > mikeh@mordor.com, > michael@everyman.demon.co.uk, tim@xara.co.uk, > Alan.Holmes@brunel.ac.uk, uk.misc@news.demon.co.uk, > uk-misc@news.demon.co.uk, uk-media@news.demon.co.uk, > uk.media@news.demon.co.uk, uk.legal@news.demon.co.uk, > uk-legal@news.demon.co.uk, alt-conspiracy@news.demon.co.uk, > alt.conspiracy@news.demon.co.uk, > soc.culture.british@news.demon.co.uk, > soc-culture-british@news.demon.co.uk, > soc-culture-canada@news.demon.co.uk, > soc.culture.canada@news.demon.co.uk >Newsgroups: uk.misc, uk.media, soc.culture.british, soc.culture.canada, uk.legal, alt.conspiracy >From: bu765@torfree.net (Mike Corley) >Subject: Oops! Sorry! >Organization: Toronto Free-Net >X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2] >Date: Thu, 26 Sep 1995 01:23:45 GMT >Lines: 27 >X-PMFLAGS: 33554560 -- Ray Dunn (opinions are my own) | Phone: (514) 938 9050 Montreal | Phax : (514) 938 5225 ray@ultimate-tech.com | Home : (514) 630 3749 4099 Tag: GetTickCount in debug builds Tag: 101461
  - 4
    - open bank and other optimizations Hi, I want to take adventage of the open bank and open row policy available in the processor (it can keep 4 banks open per bank, for a total of 12 banks at a time) that I am using (AU1xxx), by locating code, data, etc. on separete SDRAM bank and row boundaries. The processor's documentation says that it can be done using the linker, to indicate aligment of the various sections. The PB and VS compiler allows to do that with: #pragma comment(linker, "/SECTION:name, ALIGN=#") My problem is, I do no understand how all this fit together. For example, how can I use this technique to align network buffers or program code on an SDRAM bank boundary (i.e. a 128 MB SDRAM with 32 MB bank size and 4 KB row size)? Thanks a lot for your help. Alex PS: Any tips in finding way to reduce the working set of my application under WinCE? Tag: GetTickCount in debug builds Tag: 101459
  - 5
    - Kernel Profiler - Required Compiler / Linker Switches? Hi all, I've got a driver I'm needing to profile that for various reasons gets built via gmake on the command line in a tree completely outside of the normal CE build process. This isn't an issue, but I'm trying to profile the driver and think I'm missing something as all the profiler hits inside the driver are getting registered as : <UNACCOUNTED FOR> Checking the documentation for the kernel profiler, normally in CE land you include profiling info in a driver via : 1) set IMGPROFILER=1 2) set WINCEMAP=1 So I'm running a debug build and have checked that I'm generating map files by specifying : -map:drivername.map -mapinfo:lines I also manually copied the drivers dll and test harness .exe as well as associated files to the release directory just in case : driver.dll driver.map driver.pdb driver.rel driver.dll driver.dll drivertest.ex2 drivertest.map drivertest.pdb However this didn't help so I'm leaning towards thinking that I've somehow missed a compiler or linker flag thats needed. Any suggestions? Cheers, ~Pev Tag: GetTickCount in debug builds Tag: 101458
  - 6
    - MI5 Persecution: Question and Answer 27/9/95 (2585) In article <DFGxnF.Cr8.0.bloor@torfree.net> bu765@torfree.net "Mike Corley" writes: >>> ##: There were also a few other things said at the trial >>> ##: relating to this which I won't repeat here; it was in the papers >>> ##: at the time anyway. This quote and others said by and about this >>> ##: witness were repeating things that had been said by and about >>> ##: me at around that time. When, where and by whom ? Let's have some details that can be checked. I'm not going to repeat them. They're hurtful to me because they contained abuse that was directed against me by someone else at the time and which got picked up and thrown again in the trial. It is a matter of record but I won't repeat it here. >>> PM: >Who's character is being assassinated? It isn't clear from the post. >>> PM: >Are we talking about Grenville Janner? I thought he was a spook >>> PM: >himself? He's certainly able to hold his own on the issue you cite. >>> ##: Mine, mainly. The reason for putting that episode at the top >>> ##: of the posting is that they tried to kill two birds with one stone >>> ##: at the Beck trial - they simultaneously put words into the mouth >>> ##: of their invented "witness" to smear Janner, and repeated exactly, >>> ##: word-for-word, stuff which had been said by and about me. Why would "they" wish to assassinate your character? Well, let's put it this way - just because this is the first time it's happened in this way, from these people, on this scale, doesn't mean that it hasn't happened before, on a lesser scale. At university there were people who quite overtly hated me and would have wished something nasty to happen to me. Because of where I went making the wrong sort of enemies is pretty deadly. "They" would wish to assassinate my character because it had all been done before, and because they knew I would not be able to react in any other way than I'd reacted previously. >>> ##: They invaded my home with their bugs, they repeated what I >>> ##: was saying in the privacy of my home, and they laughed that it >>> ##: was "so funny", that I was impotent and could not even communicate >>> ##: what was going on. Who did this? Our friends on BBC television, >>> ##: our friends in ITN, last but not least our friends in Capital >>> ##: Radio in London and on Radio 1. Please give details of when, where and by whom these comments were made, so that they can be checked. This was four, five years ago... sorry, I don't remember. I can remember individual incidents, words which were repeated by different people at different times in different locations. Around the end of 1992 Private Eye rtan a front-cover with John and Norma Major, with the title "Major's support lowest ever" and John saying to Norma "Come back norma" on the front cover. What can you read in to that? Not a lot, seems like standard fare for PE. The first time I saw it I was in the pub with some people from work. One was expressing doubts to the other (let's call the first one Simon, shall we? and the second one Phil?) about whether what was going on was right. Phil's answer was that if Private Eye was doing it then it must be ok, "they're usually right". A few days later, again near work, there were some students laughing in the street, "Were you COMING BACK later? But I thought you said you were COMING BACK ha ha ha?" Play on words, you see. Not very nice, either. I had start medication soon afterwards. Clever people, these chaps who think up PE titles. Just slightly lacking in any sense of morality. >>> ##: How did they do this? I'll give you an example. About a year ago, >>> ##: I was listening to Chris Tarrant (Capital Radio DJ among other >>> ##: pursuits) on his radio morning show, when he said, talking about >>> ##: someone he didn't identify, "you know this bloke? he says we're >>> ##: trying to kill him. We should be done for attempted manslaughter" >>> ##: which mirrored something I had said a day or two before. >>> ##: Now that got broadcast to the whole of London - if any recordings >>> ##: are kept of the shows then it'll be there. What was the date of the broadcast ? Out of 2 million plus listeners, why should you be the only one that Tarrant was allegedly referring to ? Sometyime in spring 1994. I can't remember the date, I heard the broadcast in the car - I was going into the office from London that day and just happened to snap on the radio, and hey presto! Mr Tarrant gives us the benefit of his excellent understanding. >>> ##: That's exactly what we did. We went to a competent, professional >>> ##: detective agency in London, paid them over 400 quid to debug our house. >>> ##: They found nothing. What was the name of the detective agency and their address ? I don't see why I should tell you that, but they're in Yellow Pages; they're a well-established outfit. >>> PM: >What? Spend a quarter mil. a year to amuse themselves? And why not >>> PM: >change every now and again? Why keep watching you? (Unless you _are_ >>> PM: >doing something, and I don't think you are, though you may have some >>> PM: >deep, dark secret in your past.) >>> >>> ##: See the above. Is there a deep dark secret in your past ? Apart from "it's all happened before in a different way", no. >>> ##: In a couple of cases people have even known my name - when I was in >>> ##: London over Easter somebody (no idea who they were, just some bloke with >>> ##: his girlfriend) called me by name - quite clearly, and my name is >>> ##: distinctive. Is your name truly Mike Corley, or are you using it as an alias ? It's an alias. I'm not English by ethnic origin. If someone manages to pronounce my name as well as that guy did then they must have been really trying. >>> ##: There's a little story behind this. First of all, in 1992 I worked >>> ##: for a company where the people made clear they knew what was going on, >>> ##: first of all directly (the very first evening I was there I went out to >>> ##: the pub with them and the Technical Director said to another guy, >>> ##: "is this the bloke who's been on TV?" "yeah, I think so") Have you appeared, or been reported by name on TV ? When, where and by whom ? No. Never. Not directly. >>> ##: Also, in summer 1992 I went on a trip abroad to Europe by coach, What was the name of the coach company and your date of departure ? It was a national express coach. At dover we boarded a ferry for Holland somewhere. The company that organized the trip went out of business some time ago, so they won't have records of passengers - so we can't get any corroboration from anyone else that way. We tried all that last summer, ran into a brick wall. The other thing is in summer 1992 I was visibly ill, so other people in the party might remember that more than anyone getting at me on the coach trip. >>> ##: >>Yes, this gets me. I think the answer is that I was set up by >>> ##: >>someone. I was very aware when this started back in 1990 that I >>> ##: >>was being painted as a "threat" to which people had to "react" Why were you being painted as a "threat"; is this related to a "deep,dark, secret" ? Aaaarrrrgh. I think I should make clear that that's their created justification rather than the real reason. They started harassing first and then came up with the reasons for it. >>> >>> ##: I think I know who set me up. Who ? Someone who knew me some time ago. Someone who would have been able to talk this little campaign into existence. >>> ##: The bloke can't even control his own mind without medicine. Is this true ? What is the medication and dosage ? Yes, I'm afraid so. Sulpiride, 200mg a day. It's designed to stop people coming up with the sort of ideas you've heard here for the last few weeks. Give him a higher dose!! In the long term it causes tardive dyskinesia, tardive dementia and general nasty stuff to your brain. So it's three years of sulpiride talking to you here. >-- >john heelan 2585 Tag: GetTickCount in debug builds Tag: 101457
  - 7
    - MI5 Persecution: Options 21/9/95 (1071) From: john heelan <john@lorca.demon.co.uk> Newsgroups: uk.misc,alt.current-events.net-abuse,alt.journalism Subject: Re: CENSORHSIP IS IMMORAL, UNJUST AND WRONG Date: Thu, 21 Sep 95 19:17:30 GMT Organization: (Private) Lines: 65 Message-ID: <811711050snz@lorca.demon.co.uk> References: <DF8DMu.Dqu.0.bloor@torfree.net> <43qpdh$iki@news3.digex.net> Reply-To: john@lorca.demon.co.uk X-NNTP-Posting-Host: lorca.demon.co.uk X-Newsreader: Demon Internet Simple News v1.29 You have to admit that Mike is persistent and obviously feels deeply that he is being hounded by the "Security Services" and there is a Conspiracy out to get him personally. If that is true, then we should be concerned; if he is just paranoid, then we should empathise with his sickness. What we should not do is to invite censorship....that just could be implicitly joining in the putative Conspiracy. Let's look at Mike's potential options (and the alleged responses he has received): > 1. Complain to the Police: (their alleged response > "Don't be silly, Sir"; Mike's rationale "They are part > of the Conspiracy") > I don't think the police as an organisation are part of it. They're certainly not the source. The officer I spoke to at Easter clearly didn't know anything about it. And that was at my local police station in London - if anyone in the police knew you would think the people at your local cop shop would. A couple of years ago I had to go into the station after a motoring infraction, the guy I spoke to then said something about "brain like a computer sir" which my suspicions latched on to - (I'm alleged to be a programmer as some people reading this know) - but as per the usual "can';t prove nuthin" and you ask yourself if you're just being stupid suspecting on the basis of a straw > 2. Complain to a Member of Parliament (Mike's rationale: "Can't > because they are part of the Conspiracy") > I could do that actually. But he would probably tell me to go see the police, for which see above. > 3. Make it visible through the UK Press. (Mike's rationale: > "Can't because they are part of the Conspiracy") > They are actually. There's a difference though in the way journalists react to this stuff when they're "got to" by the security service. This is completely giving the game away, but the trouble originally started with my reading into stuff that was being written by Times columnists, in particular our antagonistic friend Mr Levin. But you see that some journalists are taking part in the conspiracy and others are only doing it because their puppet masters have been feeding them information which they can't allow themselves to ignore. The security services have their hooks into the UK media, this case shows that very explicitly. You also see how things get gradualkly wqorse with a particular journalist; a couple of weeks ago Peter Tory in the Express was writing about "nerds seeking their revenge on him through the Net", guess what that was about. > 4. Complain to the UK Security Services. (Mike's rationale: "Can't > because they ARE the Cnspiracy") > Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? If the fascist Gestapo bastards plot to see you dead then who's going to deal with it? Not the security services, that's for sure. > 5. Make it visible through Internet: (Mike has done this > suvccessfully; but any gainsayers are "part of the Conspiracy". > I don;t think you';re part of the consipracy if you refuse to believe or email the postmaster. Those who do know are keeping their silence. > 6. Complain to the Canadian National and State Governments. (Has > Mike done this yet ?) > No. It's a UK problem so that's where it should be dealt with. The perpetrators are UK residents, are unidentified, and would be difficult to deal with through the Canadian courts. Ditto the police in Canada, ditto the press - it isn't their problem, it's caused by UK people against someone from the UK. Of course Canadian laws are being broken relating to harassment and "stalking" which do not exist in the UK, but the Canadian police do not have a very good record of enforcing those laws anyway. > 7. Complain to the Canadian Security Services (Has Mike done this > yet ?) > > 8. Complain to the Canadian Press. (Has Mike done this yet ?) > I think if they didn't knoiw, they'd just think you were having delusions; and if they did, then they would side with the people with the power, the smiling English people with their knives out. Remember, nobody uis going to side with the person who has less power in a copfrontation. The team over here in Canada have the resources of their organization behind them, other broadcasters etc in the UK would have influence with their counterparts in Canada; after all, this was once a British colony, there is still a feeling of "looking up to" the UK among many Canadians, so if a team of security services arrives from the UK with apparently limitless resources to pursue their target, people over here will forget anything they ever knew about basic human rights and go along with what they are told to do and how they are told to behave. > 9. Complain to non-UK TV Watchdogs (Does Canada have an "Oprah > Winfrey ? Has Mike done this yet ?) > > 10. Complain to the EC Court of Human Rights. (Has Mike done > this yet ?) > > ........or...are 6,7,8,9,10 also all part of > the Conspiracy ? > > > > -- > john heelan 1071 Tag: GetTickCount in debug builds Tag: 101449
  - 8
    - makefile Hi all, In wince the makefile gets details from the sources filesto make the image.but is it possible that the make file can build without the help from sources file.if yes please explain a little Thanks Nihar Tag: GetTickCount in debug builds Tag: 101448
  - 9
    - Query on catalog components hi all This is srikanth. I am writing application to test USB driver in the wince 5.0 and I am using intel PXA27x platform (Mainstone II board). I am having very basic doubt in the wince: In the right side catalog items these are the main components: 1. BSP's 2. CORE O.S 3. DEVICE DRIVERS 4. PLATFORM MANAGER. In the BSP's/ INTEL PXA27x Dev Platform: ARMV4, there is a usb host is there, In the CORE O.S/Wince Devices, USB Host Support is there, and in the DEVICE DRIVERS, there is USB Host is there. What is the difference between these three USB Hosts? Any body having idea please differentiate clearly. If I want to test the USB Driver (Let suppose PEN Drive (usb Mass-storage device) by adding componets to the O.S design view. Which host I need to add to the o.s design. and at the same time for client driver: which componet I need to add to the o.s design. i.e I want to test usb driver by using the pen-driver by opening the pendrive and creating a files in that, or open a file in the pen-drive by using application program. I am not getting any icon or any indication in the desktop when I attatch a USB device(pen drive) to the usb port of the intel board. In our board touch screen is not working, only display we can able to see. In my application I used create file function. The code snippet is shown below: int WINAPI WinMain(HINSTANCE hInstance, HINSTANCE hPrevInstance, LPTSTR lpCmdLine, int nCmdShow) { HANDLE hFile; hFile = CreateFile((LPCTSTR)"\\USB Disk", GENERIC_WRITE| GENERIC_READ, 0, 0, OPEN_EXISTING, FILE_ATTRIBUTE_NORMAL, NULL); if( hFile == INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE ) { DEBUGMSG(1, (L"File not Copied successfully*************")); } else { DEBUGMSG(1, (L"File Copied successfully*************")); } return 0; } The createfile was giving invalid handle, because of path was not correct. what path I need to mention in the createfile function. Any body who is having idea on this please reply me. Thanks and regards, john lee Tag: GetTickCount in debug builds Tag: 101447
  - 10
    - "the selected configuration does not have a installed debugger" Hello, I Uninstall my win CE 5.0 and made a new installation of same win CE 5.0 in other location,when i about to run the platform builder after the installation there comes an error that "the selected configuration does not have a installed debugger " let me know the reason and recovery method thanks for your time Tag: GetTickCount in debug builds Tag: 101446
  - 11
    - How can I make a smartphone system? 1)It is say that the smartphone uses the Windows CE core operating system (OS) . Now I have Windows CE 5.0. What else do I need to "make" a smartphone system? 2)In the Windows CE "New Platform Wizard-step4", there're several design templates, but I can not find "smartphone" template. 3)Does "smartphone"="windows ce"+"today plusin" ? Thanks for any advices. Tag: GetTickCount in debug builds Tag: 101443
  - 12
    - using wavedev driver to record problem---noise hello, my platform is s3c2442+wince 5.0 +wolfson wm8976 codec,and i develope the wav driver based on the structure of driver MS provided(public/oak/s3c2410/wavdev), and now the playback part is ok,when it play mp3 file,the sound is good. but when I use the wavrec.exe to record,it got some noise.and the digital signal from wm8976 ADC is ok,no such noise,but when it record to wavrec.wav and then play it.it get noise and in the wavrec.exe,it setting: channels =1,bitspersample =16,samplerate =44100 (the wm8976 has only a ADC) where is the noise from?can anybody give some help?what's the function render2() in input.cpp Tag: GetTickCount in debug builds Tag: 101442
  - 13
    - Replace the ip stack in WinCE? Hi all, In my previous project, I worked under Linux to modify the IP protocol stack, actually replace it with a routing protocol designed for car-2- car communications. In Linux it is possible since I have raw access to the protocol stack, but under WinCE I have no idea how to do this... I know the tcp/ip architecture under WinCE is like Winsock API -> TCP/ IP(tckstk.dll) -> NDIS -> device driver. Anybody knows if it is possible to do my job under WinCE? If yes, on which layer I should put my efforts to? Thanks a lot! Hao Wang Tag: GetTickCount in debug builds Tag: 101441
  - 14
    - What am I missing? I installed PB 6.0 and can't see any BSPs. (other than CEPC) I downloaded the trial to PB 6.0 and visual studio 2005 Installed both and chose x86 (not ARM,MIPS or other processors) for PB 6.0 Then when I go to create an image, it lists only CEPC, not any geode bsps for which I am trying to create. (which should have been displayed as it is x86 and is listed during the install process when you chose x86) Any ideas? Thanks J PS I know geodes are x86, but they require their own BSPs. Tag: GetTickCount in debug builds Tag: 101439
  - 15
    - Information abt .REL files Hi Ppl, I am working on a windows CE project and want to understand the " .rel " file in detail, as in : what are they, what is the format, why are they formed.. etc. I did also try to google on that but somehow didnot get the Initial basic info one needs to know, to be able to understand them. Can some1 plz give me a pointer on that .. Plz excuse me if this is not the rgt grp for this post, but then do update me abt the correct post as well. Thanks in Advance. Tag: GetTickCount in debug builds Tag: 101435
  - 16
    - How to share a folder on CE Hello, Is it possible to enable a CE5.0's folder share on LAN? Thanks. Cheng Shi Emtronix Tag: GetTickCount in debug builds Tag: 101430
  - 17
    - Problem with eboot Hi, I am having two problems with eboot that I can't figure out: 1=2E When eboot tries to load OS from Flash, it sends the following message to debug serial Microsoft Windows CE Ethernet Bootloader Common Library Version 1.1 Built Jun 7 2007 14:54:25 Hit ENTER within 3 seconds to change boot setting! System reaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa..... serial port keeps seding a's whereas it should have displayed "System ready!" and "Preparing for download...." 2=2E If I try to burn nk.bin from PB I get the following: Microsoft Windows CE Ethernet Bootloader Common Library Version 1.1 Built Jun 7 2007 14:54:25 Hit ENTER within 3 seconds to change boot setting! Ethernet Boot Loader Configuration: 0) MAC Address: 12:13:17:28:31:00 1) Static IP address: 10.10.0.1 2) Static Subnet mask: 255.255.255.0 3) DHCP: Disabled 4) Reset to factory default configuration 5) Save current Eboot Configuration D) Download image now E) Erase NOR Flash L) Launch existing OS Image from NOR Flash R) Launch existing OS image from RAM A) AutoBoot: Enabled NOR Enter your selection: d System ready! Preparing for download... +EbootSendBootmeAndWaitForTftp Sent BOOTME to 255.255.255.255 Sent BOOTME to 255.255.255.255 Locked Down Link 1 Src IP 10.10.0.1 Port 0400 Dest IP 10.10.0.5 Port 0512 EthDown::TFTPD_OPEN::boot.bin -EbootSendBootmeAndWaitForTftp Download BIN file information: ----------------------------------------------------- [0]: Base Address=3D0x80040000 Length=3D0xF2A67C rom_offset=3D0x0. Flash Programming is about to start! Hit "F" to proceed! Starting Flash Programming 0xA0040000 0x88240000 0x3CA99F Sector Erase at [0xA0040000h - 0xA0F6A678h]... \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/ \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/ \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/ \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/ \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/ \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/ \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/ \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/ Programming at [0xA0040000h - 0xA0F6A678h]... PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP Flash Write Complete Flash Verifing at [0xA0040000h - 0xA0F6A678h]... SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS Flash Programming Complettttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt= tttttttttttttttt.... serial port keeps sending t's. It should have just sent "Flash Programming Complete". Is this something wrong the the memory or the program itself? Thanks for any pointers. Tag: GetTickCount in debug builds Tag: 101427
  - 18
    - Quarts Unresolved Externals I am getting the following when I sysgen: C:\WINCE500\public\directx\oak\lib\ARMV4I\debug\quartz.lib C: \WINCE500\PBWorkspaces\3Play\WINCE500\MX21_ARMV4I\cesysgen\oak\lib \ARMV4I\debug\quartz0.lib C:\WINCE500\public\directx\sdk\lib\ARMV4I \debug\dmoguids.lib C:\WINCE500\PBWorkspaces\3Play\WINCE500\MX21_ARMV4I \cesysgen\oak\lib\ARMV4I\debug\quartz1.lib C:\WINCE500\PBWorkspaces \3Play\WINCE500\MX21_ARMV4I\cesysgen\oak\lib\ARMV4I\debug\quartz2.lib C:\WINCE500\PBWorkspaces\3Play\WINCE500\MX21_ARMV4I\cesysgen\oak\lib \ARMV4I\debug\quartz3.lib C:\WINCE500\public\directx\oak\lib\ARMV4I \debug\wmt_strmcore.lib C:\WINCE500\public\directx\oak\lib\ARMV4I\debug \wmt_splitter.lib C:\WINCE500\public\directx\oak\lib\ARMV4I\debug \acmobj.lib C:\WINCE500\public\directx\oak\lib\ARMV4I\debug\icmobj.lib C:\WINCE500\public\directx\oak\lib\ARMV4I\debug\m3uplayl.lib C: \WINCE500\public\directx\oak\lib\ARMV4I\debug\xmlplayl.lib C: \WINCE500\public\directx\oak\lib\ARMV4I\debug\urlgrab.lib C: \WINCE500\public\directx\oak\lib\ARMV4I\debug\urlobj.lib C: \WINCE500\public\directx\oak\lib\ARMV4I\debug\wmt_filestrm.lib C: \WINCE500\PBWorkspaces\3Play\WINCE500\MX21_ARMV4I\cesysgen\sdk\lib \ARMV4I\debug\strmiids.lib C:\WINCE500\public\directx\oak\lib\ARMV4I \debug\qtzbase.lib C:\WINCE500\public\directx\oak\lib\ARMV4I\debug \quartzstub.lib C:\WINCE500\public\directx\oak\lib\ARMV4I\debug \dxmasfstub.lib C:\WINCE500\public\directx\oak\lib\ARMV4I\debug \cedrm.lib C:\WINCE500\PBWorkspaces\3Play\WINCE500\MX21_ARMV4I\cesysgen \sdk\lib\ARMV4I\debug\uuid.lib C:\WINCE500\PBWorkspaces\3Play \WINCE500\MX21_ARMV4I\cesysgen\sdk\lib\ARMV4I\debug\ole32.lib C: \WINCE500\PBWorkspaces\3Play\WINCE500\MX21_ARMV4I\cesysgen\sdk\lib \ARMV4I\debug\oleaut32.lib C:\WINCE500\PBWorkspaces\3Play \WINCE500\MX21_ARMV4I\cesysgen\sdk\lib\ARMV4I\debug\dxguid.lib C: \WINCE500\public\directx\oak\lib\ARMV4I\debug\wmtguid.lib C: \WINCE500\PBWorkspaces\3Play\WINCE500\MX21_ARMV4I\cesysgen\sdk\lib \ARMV4I\debug\mmtimer.lib C:\WINCE500\PBWorkspaces\3Play \WINCE500\MX21_ARMV4I\cesysgen\oak\target\ARMV4I\debug\0409\quartz.res C:\WINCE500\PBWorkspaces\3Play\WI NCE500\MX21_ARMV4I\cesysgen\sdk\lib\ARMV4I\debug\coredll.lib C: \WINCE500\public\common\sdk\lib\ARMV4I\debug\corelibc.lib C:\WINCE500\PBWorkspaces\3Play\WINCE500\MX21_ARMV4I\cesysgen\oak\lib \ARMV4I\debug\quartz.exp quartz1.lib(urlrdr.obj) : error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol DeleteUrlCacheEntryW referenced in function "private: unsigned long __cdecl CURLReader::ThreadProcEnd(void)" (? ThreadProcEnd@CURLReader@@AAAKXZ) quartz1.lib(urlrdr.obj) : error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol RevokeBindStatusCallback referenced in function "private: unsigned long __cdecl CURLReader::ThreadProcEnd(void)" (? ThreadProcEnd@CURLReader@@AAAKXZ) quartz1.lib(urlrdr.obj) : error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol RegisterBindStatusCallback referenced in function "public: long __cdecl CURLReader::StartDownload(void)" (? StartDownload@CURLReader@@QAAJXZ) quartz1.lib(urlrdr.obj) : error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol CreateURLMoniker referenced in function "public: long __cdecl CURLReader::StartDownload(void)" (?StartDownload@CURLReader@@QAAJXZ) C:\WINCE500\PBWorkspaces\3Play\WINCE500\MX21_ARMV4I\cesysgen\oak\target \ARMV4I\debug\quartz.dll : fatal error LNK1120: 4 unresolved externals NMAKE : fatal error U1077: 'link' : return code '0x460' Those functions are in urlmon and I see that urlmon is getting built. Why isn't it being included in this sysgen? The build of DirectX works, just the sysgen doesn't. Any help is appreciated. Tag: GetTickCount in debug builds Tag: 101423
  - 19
    - ACM Unresolved Errors I had my platform building just fine in PB5. I added several graphics, audio and multimedia items to the catalog. I can't remember which ones I added. Now when I build and sysgen or even just sysgen (I still can't figure out which is which and when to do them) I get the following: TARGETNAME: coredll makefile.def: Including C:\WINCE500\public\common\oak\misc \sources.ReleaseType_SDK BUILD_MARKER:LINK_DLL_START Linking C:\WINCE500\PBWorkspaces\3Play \WINCE500\MX21_ARMV4I\cesysgen\sdk\lib\ARMV4I\debug\coredll.lib link -lib -out:C:\WINCE500\PBWorkspaces\3Play\WINCE500\MX21_ARMV4I \cesysgen\sdk\lib\ARMV4I\debug\coredll.lib -def:C: \WINCE500\PBWorkspaces\3Play\WINCE500\MX21_ARMV4I\cesysgen\oak\lib \ARMV4I\debug\coredll.def -machine:thumb @C:\DOCUME~1\tpitman \LOCALS~1\Temp\nm3D68.tmp Microsoft (R) Library Manager Version 7.10.4017 Copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. -nodefaultlib -ignore:4001 -subsystem:windowsce,5.00 C:\WINCE500\PBWorkspaces\3Play\WINCE500\MX21_ARMV4I\cesysgen\oak\lib \ARMV4I\debug\coredll_ALL.lib coredll.def : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol acmDriverAdd coredll.def : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol acmDriverClose coredll.def : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol acmDriverDetails coredll.def : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol acmDriverEnum coredll.def : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol acmDriverID coredll.def : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol acmDriverMessage coredll.def : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol acmDriverOpen coredll.def : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol acmDriverPriority coredll.def : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol acmDriverRemove coredll.def : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol acmFilterChoose coredll.def : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol acmFilterDetails coredll.def : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol acmFilterEnum coredll.def : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol acmFilterTagDetails coredll.def : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol acmFilterTagEnum coredll.def : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol acmFormatChoose coredll.def : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol acmFormatDetails coredll.def : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol acmFormatEnum coredll.def : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol acmFormatSuggest coredll.def : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol acmFormatTagDetails coredll.def : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol acmFormatTagEnum coredll.def : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol acmGetVersion coredll.def : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol acmMetrics coredll.def : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol acmStreamClose coredll.def : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol acmStreamConvert coredll.def : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol acmStreamMessage coredll.def : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol acmStreamOpen coredll.def : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol acmStreamPrepareHeader coredll.def : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol acmStreamReset coredll.def : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol acmStreamSize coredll.def : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol acmStreamUnprepareHeader C:\WINCE500\PBWorkspaces\3Play\WINCE500\MX21_ARMV4I\cesysgen\sdk\lib \ARMV4I\debug\coredll.lib : fatal error LNK1120: 30 unresolved externals NMAKE : fatal error U1077: 'link' : return code '0x460' Stop. Any idea how to figure out which item messed things up? I would hate to have to take them all out one at a time because I can't remember them all. Is there some way to just know? Better yet is there a way to find where these things are defined and INCLUDE the right thing so it will build? Tag: GetTickCount in debug builds Tag: 101419
  - 20
    - Problem with bootpart.lib Hi, I'm developing an bootloader/OAL for a PXA255/32MB StrataFlash in PB4.2 using as a model the XSCBD BSP. When I try to save an image to FLASH using bootpart.lib I get the following message: IsValidMBR: MBR sector = 0xFFFFFFFF OpenPartition: Invalid MBR. Formatting flash. Enter LowLevelFormat [0x0, 0x7D]. Erasing flash block(s) [0x0, 0x7D] (please wait): Done. WriteMBR: MBR block = 0x0. MD_WriteSector: Timed out writing buffered data CreatePartition: could not write to block 0x0 Done. OpenPartition: Partition Exists=0x0 for part 0x21. CreatePartition: Enter CreatePartition for 0x21. LastLogSector: Last log sector is: 0xF80F. CreatePartition: Start = 0x1, Num = 0x661. Log2Phys: Logical 0x1 -> Physical 0x1 MD_WriteSector: Timed out writing buffered data CreatePartition: can't mark sector info. ERROR: OEMLaunch: failed to create/open BINFS partition. To get at this point takes a lot of time... so, a couple of question arises: 1. What is the problem? 2. Is this the only way to save the image? I mean, I could use FMD to write/read it, as it's done with bootloader config info. Is there a reason to do it this way? does kernel use this partition afterward or it's just for using the remaining space as an extended partition? Regards JSS Tag: GetTickCount in debug builds Tag: 101418
  - 21
    - Making flash the root file system I have been posting and getting responses on the following thread: http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.windowsce.platbuilder/browse_thread/thread/781ae18f7672e308/9c607c8638e297e8#9c607c8638e297e8 Suddenly I can't post to it. I try to post and it says post successful, but the post never shows up. I waited for an hour and it still didn't show up. Normally it shows up within a few seconds or minutes at the most. I hope noone minds that I start a new thread because of that. If you read that thread you saw that I had trouble just getting the flash driver to load. I have the flash driver loading and a new drive on my device called NAND Flash. I can create folders and files on this drive and everything works fine. I have the following registry settings: [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Drivers\BuiltIn\NandFlash] "Dll"="nandfcd.dll" "Order"=dword:0 "Prefix"="DSK" "Profile"="FlashDisk" "IClass"=multi_sz:"{A4E7EDDA-E575-4252-9D6B-4195D48BB865}" "FriendlyName"="i.MX21 NAND FLASH Driver" ; These can overridden in the particular named profile ; Various Flags ; AutoFormat - Formats the store automatically ; AutoPart - Automatically partitions the store with largest creatable partition ; AutoMount - Automatically Mounts each detected partition (if FSD driver is available) ; MountFlags (deprecated in WinCE 5.0)- Flags on how the partition is mounted ; 1 - Hidden file system ; 2 - May contain system registry ; 4 - Mount as root of file system, "\" ; 8 - Hide ROM when mounting FS root ; 10 - Mount filesystem as an external ROM filesystem ; 20 - Treat all files and subdirectories as system files ; The following registry values replace the MountFlags: ; MountHidden - Hidden file system (same as MountFlags=1) ; MountAsBootable - May contain system registry (same as MountFlags=2) ; MountAsRoot - Mount as root of file system, "\" (same as MountFlags=4) ; MountAsROM - Mount as an external ROM filesystem (same as MountFlags=10) ; MountSystem - Treat all files and subdirectories as system files (same as MountFlags=20) [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\System\StorageManager\Profiles\FlashDisk] "Name"="i.MX21 NAND FLASH" "Folder"="NAND Flash" "DefaultFileSystem"="FATFS" "AutoMount"=dword:1 ; Auto part and format disk if no partitions are present. ; WARNING! This can cause long boot times when encountering a fresh disk. "AutoPart"=dword:1 "AutoFormat"=dword:1 ; Default values for fatfs. These can be overridden per profile ; Flags DWORD See available flags below ; Valid Bits for Flags registry value ;FATFS_UPDATE_ACCESS 0x00000001 update access times if set ;FATFS_DISABLE_LOG 0x00000002 disable event logging if set ;FATFS_DISABLE_AUTOSCAN 0x00000004 disable automatic ScanVolume() ;FATFS_VERIFY_WRITES 0x00000008 verify all writes (as opposed to a handful) ;FATFS_ENABLE_BACKUP_FAT 0x00000010 add a backup FAT to all formats ;FATFS_FORCE_WRITETHROUGH 0x00000020 Force fat to be always writethrough ;FATFS_DISABLE_AUTOFORMAT 0x00000040 disable automatic formatting of unformatted volumes ;FATFS_WFWS_NOWRITETHRU 0x00010000 disable writethrough on WriteFileWithSeek API, ; improve memory-mapped file performance ;FATFS_DISABLE_FORMAT 0x00020000 disable format ;FATFS_TRANS_DATA 0x00040000 transact data on a write (i.e. clone cluster on every write) ;FATFS_TFAT_USECLUS1 0x00080000 Use cluster 1 entry in FAT table for TFAT transaction. ; By default, TFAT uses the NOF field of the boot sector ;FATFS_DISABLE_TFAT_REDIR 0x00100000 Indicates to disable redirect the root directory ; to another hidden directory for FAT12 or 16, ; since root dir isn't transacted in those cases ;FATFS_TFAT_ALWAYS 0x00200000 Always mark transaction status, even only one sector in FAT is changed ;FATFS_FORCE_TFAT 0x00400000 Force TFAT transactioning even if volume isn't formatted as TFAT ; NOTES: common.reg default is "Flags"=dword:00000064 [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\System\StorageManager\Profiles\FlashDisk\FATFS] ; Override common setting to enable automatic formatting of unformatted volumes "Flags"=dword:00000024 ; Additional settings for multi xip or persistent storage in NAND ; Entry for nand driver to be loaded by storage manager. ; Once a driver has been loaded by storage manager, it will not ; be loaded again by device manager. ; Note: Needed for Hive registry or persistent storage [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\System\StorageManager\AutoLoad\Nandfcd] "DriverPath"="Drivers\\BuiltIn\\NandFlash" ; LoadFlags 0x01 == load synchronously "LoadFlags"=dword:1 "BootPhase"=dword:0 ; Note: if BinFS is used together with PS, then should ensure ; this is loaded after BinFS by setting order to 1 and that ; BinFS autoload order is 0. "Order"=dword:0 ; NAND persistent storage settings only [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\System\StorageManager\Profiles\FlashDisk\FATFS] ; System registry in FATFS partition "MountAsBootable"=dword:1 ; To mount FAT partition as root "MountAsRoot"=dword:1 As you can see I have set the flash to mount as bootable and mount as root. I also have ROM File System as a part of my platform. How do I tell if it is working? If I create a folder or file under My Documents and reboot it doesn't stay like the ones I create on NAND Flash drive do. I looked through the debug log and don't see any errors. The only thing I do see is that the formatter is running every time it loads. Here is the output: 8943 PID:bfc44ee TID:bfc44ca 0x8bfc4288: FLASHDRV.DLL:L2P_GetPhysicalSectorAddr() - Secondary table doesn't exist for logical sector 0x0!!! 8977 PID:bfc44ee TID:bfc44ca 0x8bfc4288: PD_FormatPartition - type is 6 8979 PID:bfc44ee TID:bfc44ca 0x8bfc4288: NumSec=130720 BytesPerSec=512 FreeSec=0 BiggestCreatable=0 8979 PID:bfc44ee TID:bfc44ca 0x8bfc4288: Partition PART00 NumSectors=130718 8979 PID:bfc44ee TID:bfc44ca 0x8bfc4288: MSPART!PD_OpenPartition: dwStoreId=000B2F30, PartName=PART00 8993 PID:bfc44ee TID:bfc44ca 0x8bfc4288: >>> Loading module fatfsd.dll at address 0x03E40000-0x03E6B000 (RW data at 0x01FF2000-0x01FF263C) Loaded symbols for 'C:\WINCE500\PBWORKSPACES\3PLAY\RELDIR \MX21_ARMV4I_DEBUG\FATFSD.DLL' 9005 PID:bfc44ee TID:bfc44ca 0x8bfc4288: >>> Loading module fatutil.dll at address 0x03E10000-0x03E27000 (RW data at 0x01FED000-0x01FEE0E8) Loaded symbols for 'C:\WINCE500\PBWORKSPACES\3PLAY\RELDIR \MX21_ARMV4I_DEBUG\FATUTIL.DLL' 9009 PID:bfc44ee TID:bfc44ca 0x8bfc4288: FormatDisk!FormatVolume: New extended boot sector successfully written 9508 PID:bfc44ee TID:bfc44ca 0x8bfc4288: FLASHDRV.DLL:L2P_GetPhysicalSectorAddr() - Secondary table doesn't exist for logical sector 0x200!!! 10002 PID:bfc44ee TID:bfc44ca 0x8bfc4288: FLASHDRV.DLL:L2P_GetPhysicalSectorAddr() - Secondary table doesn't exist for logical sector 0x400!!! 10033 PID:bfc44ee TID:bfc44ca 0x8bfc4288: FormatDisk!FormatVolume: New FAT #0 successfully written 10034 PID:bfc44ee TID:bfc44ca 0x8bfc4288: FormatDisk!FormatVolume: New root directory successfully written 10036 PID:bfc44ee TID:bfc44ca 0x8bfc4288: FormatDisk!FormatVolume: New BPB successfully written 10036 PID:bfc44ee TID:bfc44ca 0x8bfc4288: FormatDisk!FormatVolume complete. 10037 PID:bfc44ee TID:bfc44ca 0x8bfc4288: <<< Unloading module fatutil.dll at address 0x03E10000-0x03E27000 (RW data at 0x01FED000-0x01FEE0E8) Unloaded symbols for 'C:\WINCE500\PBWORKSPACES\3PLAY\RELDIR \MX21_ARMV4I_DEBUG\FATUTIL.DLL' 10038 PID:bfc44ee TID:bfc44ca 0x8bfc4288: FSD_MountDisk: mounting volumes for hDsk=000B4CA0 10040 PID:bfc44ee TID:bfc44ca 0x8bfc4288: FATFS!OpenVolume: access time updates disabled 10040 PID:bfc44ee TID:bfc44ca 0x8bfc4288: FATFS!OpenVolume: event logging enabled 10041 PID:bfc44ee TID:bfc44ca 0x8bfc4288: FATFS!OpenVolume: automatic scanning disabled 10041 PID:bfc44ee TID:bfc44ca 0x8bfc4288: FATFS!OpenVolume: write verify disabled 10041 PID:bfc44ee TID:bfc44ca 0x8bfc4288: FATFS!OpenVolume: extra FAT on format disabled 10041 PID:bfc44ee TID:bfc44ca 0x8bfc4288: FATFS!OpenVolume: force write through enabled 10043 PID:bfc44ee TID:bfc44ca 0x8bfc4288: FATFS!OpenVolume: Codepage = 1 10045 PID:bfc44ee TID:bfc44ca 0x8bfc4288: FATFS!OpenVolume: Number of path cache entries = 50 10063 PID:bfc44ee TID:bfc44ca 0x8bfc4288: >>> Loading module diskcache.dll at address 0x03E30000-0x03E39000 (RW data at 0x01FF0000-0x01FF04F4) Loaded symbols for 'C:\WINCE500\PBWORKSPACES\3PLAY\RELDIR \MX21_ARMV4I_DEBUG\DISKCACHE.DLL' 10065 PID:bfc44ee TID:bfc44ca 0x8bfc4288: CreateCache: Successful. Cache Size: 256 KB, Start: 32, End: 1053. 10066 PID:bfc44ee TID:bfc44ca 0x8bfc4288: CreateCache: Successful. Cache Size: 512 KB, Start: 1054, End: 130717. 10480 PID:bfc44ee TID:bfc44ca 0x8bfc4288: FATFS!InitVolume: FAT version: 32 10480 PID:bfc44ee TID:bfc44ca 0x8bfc4288: FATFS!InitVolume: Cluster Size (Sectors): 1 10482 PID:bfc44ee TID:bfc44ca 0x8bfc4288: FS: Registering file system NAND Flash, index 4, flags 0x00000002 10483 PID:bfc44ee TID:bfc44ca 0x8bfc4288: FS: Mount complete (NAND Flash, index 4, flags 0x00000002) 10484 PID:bfc44ee TID:bfc44ca 0x8bfc4288: InitSharedHeap: 44000000 10000 c 10485 PID:bfc44ee TID:bfc44ca 0x8bfc4288: InitSharedHeap: return 44000060 10495 PID:bfc44ee TID:bfc44ca 0x8bfc4288: >>> Loading module relfsd.dll at address 0x03E00000-0x03E0B000 (RW data at 0x01FEB000-0x01FEBADC) Loaded symbols for 'C:\WINCE500\PBWORKSPACES\3PLAY\RELDIR \MX21_ARMV4I_DEBUG\RELFSD.DLL' 10501 PID:bfc44ee TID:bfc44ca 0x8bfc4288: FS: Registering file system Release, index 5, flags 0x00000000 10501 PID:bfc44ee TID:bfc44ca 0x8bfc4288: Mounted ReleaseFSD volume '\Release' 10514 PID:bfc44ee TID:bfc44ca 0x8bfc4288: size of 'dbglist.txt' = 00000000 10516 PID:bfc44ee TID:bfc44ca 0x8bfc4288: FS: Mount complete (Release, index 5, flags 0x00000000) 10516 PID:bfc44ee TID:bfc44ca 0x8bfc4288: FSREG: Unable to read value "NoDefaultUser" under HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\init\BootVars 10516 PID:bfc44ee TID:bfc44ca 0x8bfc4288: FSREG: Logging in default user. 10517 PID:bfc44ee TID:bfc44ca 0x8bfc4288: FSREG: Unable to read value "DefaultUser" under HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\init\BootVars 10517 PID:bfc44ee TID:bfc44ca 0x8bfc4288: SetCurrentUser: Logging out (nobody), logging in default 10517 PID:bfc44ee TID:bfc44ca 0x8bfc4288: FS: Using default path "\profiles\" The problem with thinking that is it is that files in NAND Flash stick around after a reboot. Maybe the root is at a different location or partition? Any ideas? Tag: GetTickCount in debug builds Tag: 101416
  - 22
    - WiFi support in WinCE 6.0 Dear All, From the documentation of WinCE 6.0, it mentioned that "Windows Embedded CE 6.0 does not support Native Wi-Fi". So if we want to support Wi-Fi in our OS, do we need to include third-party driver for it, or Wireless LAN (WLAN) 802.11 STA is good enough? Thanks, James Tag: GetTickCount in debug builds Tag: 101412
  - 23
    - Bluetooth File Transfer Dear All: I have Windows CE PXA 270 based platform with CSR uart Bluetooth interface. I am looking for Blutooth file transfer application, from PDA to PC and from PC to PDA. So far no luck. If anyone suggest me where to find or willing to do it for me, it will be grat help. I have added OBEX server and client both to my image. My e-mail is jules.karim@viewsonic.com. Thanks Tag: GetTickCount in debug builds Tag: 101407
  - 24
    - Installing a new BSP Hi All, Can anyone tell me what I did wrong in installing a new BSP to the PB6? The following is what I did: 1. I converted a previous BSP from .cec to .pbcxml file. 2. I created a folder \MyTest\Catalog under \PLATFORM and copied that pbcxml file to that folder. 3. Create a new OS, but my new BSP was not in the available BSP list. Thanks in advance, James Tag: GetTickCount in debug builds Tag: 101406
  - 25
    - Have you succeed to make the nand flash as usb mass storage? Has anybody ever succeeded to make the nand flash as usb mass storage? According to the document, we need to set following REG items: [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Drivers\USB\FunctionDrivers\Mass_Storage_Class] "Dll"="usbmsfn.dll" "Vendor"=dword:17CC "Product"=dword:2280 "InterfaceSubClass"=dword:06 "InterfaceProtocol"=dword:50 "DeviceName"="DSK1:" "Removable"=dword:0 The key operation is to change the "DeviceName"="DSK1:" I have tried to change the DeviceName, such as "DSK1" , "MSFLASH" etc, but not succeed yet! Is there anyone succeed? (CE5 , S3C2440 BSP) Tag: GetTickCount in debug builds Tag: 101400
- Next
  - 1
    - default.fdf file is restored after readRegistryFormOem calls I implemented Read/WriteRegistryToOEM functions on my target (CEPC) and everything worked fine for a while. Since some days, my registry is not more persistent and I dont know why. My readRegistryFromEOM function is called, data seems to be valid (I verified with a checksum computed in both read/write functions), but registry is not updated. I excluded default.fdf file from my image and now, registry is well updated at boot. My conclusions are : 1. my Read/WriteRegistryToOEM functions implementation is OK. 2. for an unknown reason, the system, after having updated registry with readRegistryFromEOM calls, is restoring default registry. Does someone know what could be this reason ? Thanks Dominique Tag: GetTickCount in debug builds Tag: 101396
  - 2
    - Problems with emulation ( Plat. Builder & VS2005 ) Hello, After some problems, I have connected VStudio 2005 with the emulator launched from the Platform builder as is reported in http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms228708(VS.80).aspx . But know I have another problem: in the SDK I have developed, the only "target" that appears in the visual studio is the "CEPC 86 Release" , but not the "Windows CE 5.0 device" that is the one that connects with the emulator. What I'm doing wrong? Should I develope a SDK that includes the "Windows CE 5.0 device" ? ( I haven`t found how to do it ) Thanks Tag: GetTickCount in debug builds Tag: 101392
  - 3
    - A issue about KITL Hi everyone, I need your help! Now I met a problem when I use USB KITL. I can use USB KITL to download the image, but when the system starts. There is just one message in the PB output window: "Sp=ffffc7cc". Then I can get a debug message from serial debug port:"RndisMini rcv REMOTE_NDIS_RESET_MSG from host!". When I use USB protocol analyzer debug the USB BUS, I found the device send the data packet including debug message "Sp=ffffc7cc" to host, but the host didn't response to this packet. Then when 2 seconds past, the device restransmit it and timeout. After that HOST send REMOTE_NDIS_RESET_MSG to device and the connection failed. From the USB protocol analyzer I didn't find any protocol error. I just want to know why the host side didn't response to the debug message data packet. Thanks. Tag: GetTickCount in debug builds Tag: 101391
  - 4
    - Hive based registry Hi all, I wanted to implement hive based registry in an x86 based board, i am using wince 6.0(We have done the same in wince 5.0 successfully). I wanted to get hive registry in compact flash(I am using atapi driver). I could able to boot the system with "ram based reg", but for hive it is not coming up. i tried with setting PRJ_ENABLE_ FSREGHIVE as 1, no use. So here is the debug output, i deleted something. I have selected RAM and ROM file system also tried with ROM only file system.(See the last few lines) Thanks and Regards, Sankarraj Microsoft Windows CE BIOS Bootloader Version 2.3 (Built Apr 4 2005)INFO: code=0x4. INFO: code=0x4. INFO: code=0x4. Jumping to image (address=0x226DF0) Debug Serial Init SysInit: GDTBase=82474000 IDTBase=8247e8c0 KData=82479800 Windows CE Kernel for i486 Built on Feb 6 2007 at 14:58:03 INFO:OALLogSetZones: dpCurSettings.ulZoneMask: 0xb PCIBIOS:: BIOS Address static map to addr=a00e0000 GetPicRoutingIrqTable: Start search_pci_bios start CE Ethernet Bootloader found 32Bit BIOS Entry master_bios32=a00f0000 bios32_call_offset=10010 for CE/PC Return from First BIOS EAX=49435000 EBX=f0000,ECX=10000 EDX=31 32 PCI BIOS offset located.addr=10031 32 PCI BIOS Present EDX=20494350,EAX=1 EBX=f0210,ECX=10001 +GetRoutingOption search_pci_routing search_pci_routing found entry =a00f3e50 CE/PC GetRoutingOption, found ROM version for Routing table. GetRoutingOption return SUCCESS .AH=0 ScanConfiguredIrq with PCI Exclusive Irq Bit (wExClusive) =0 ScanConfigureIrq: BufferSize = 144 @ address 824777ea OSAXST0: Platform Name = Geode Platform OSAXST1: >>> Loading Module 'kd.dll' (0x83FDC57C) at address 0xC0010000-0xC003E000 in Process 'NK.EXE' (0x8247BC80) KD: Starting kernel debugger software probe (KdStub) - KD API version 22 Calling KDEnableInt (FALSE, NULL) without previously calling KDEnableInt (FALSE, p) OSAXST1: >>> Loading Module 'NK.EXE' (0x8247BC80) at address 0x80220000-0x80233000 in Process 'NK.EXE' (0x8247BC80) Message Queue support initialized, g_hMsgQHeap = d0040750 OSAXST1: >>> Loading Module 'filesys.dll' (0x83FBA198) at address 0xC0170000-0xC01EA000 in Process 'NK.EXE' (0x8247BC80) OSAXST1: >>> Loading Module 'fsdmgr.dll' (0x83FBA2D0) at address 0xC0520000-0xC0556000 in Process 'NK.EXE' (0x8247BC80) FSDMGR!DllMain: DLL_PROCESS_ATTACH CertMod.dll not found, using old OEM Trust Model FileSystem Starting - starting with clean file system FSDMGR!STOREMGR_Initialize FSDMGR!InitializeStoreAPI FSDMGR!MountTable_t::RegisterVolumeName: Registered "StoreMgr" at index 2FSDMGR!MountTable_t::RegisterVolume: Registered volume at index 2 (Name="StoreMgr", MountFlags=0x1)FSDMGR!InitializeROMFileSystem: File System=ROM OSAXST1: >>> Loading Module 'romfsd.dll' (0x83FA43E4) at address 0xC01F0000-0xC01F6000 in Process 'NK.EXE' (0x8247BC80) FSDMGR!MountTable_t::RegisterVolumeName: Registered "ROM" at index 3FSDMGR!MountTable_t::RegisterVolume: Registered volume at index 3 (Name="ROM", MountFlags=0x71)FSVOL: Opening existing volume FSVOL: Volume heap already initialized FSREG: Mounted ROM portion of boot registry FSVOL: Creating clean virtual volume FSVOL: Initializing volume heap FSREG: Mounted RAM portion of boot registry Override Serial Driver: No COM port selected for serial KITL transport, no override necessary. FS: Creating signal event SYSTEM/DevMgrApiSetReady FS: Creating signal event SYSTEM/PowerManagerReady FS: Creating signal event SYSTEM/GweApiSetReady FS: Creating signal event SYSTEM/BatteryAPIsReady FS: Creating signal event SYSTEM/NLedAPIsReady FSREG: Unable to read value "Start DevMgr" under HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\init\BootVars FILESYS: Starting boot phase 0. FSDMGR!STOREMGR_StartBootPhase BootPhase=0 (PrevBootPhase=-1) FSDMGR: File security disabled. FSDMGR!AutoLoadFileSystems: CurrentBootPhase=FSDMGR!PNPThread: Using PNPUnloadDelay of 4096 FSDMGR!PNPThread: PNPThread starting! 0, LoadFlags=1 FSDMGR!AutoLoadFileSystem: CurrentBootPhase=0, RootKey=System\StorageManager\AutoLoad, FileSystem_t=ObjectStore FILESYS: RAM File System FSD_MountDisk registering folder "Object Store" FSDMGR!MountTable_t::RegisterVolumeName: Registered "Object Store" at index 4FSDMGR!MountTable_t::RegisterVolume: Registered volume at index 4 (Name="", MountFlags=0x44)FILESYS: Starting boot phase 1. FSDMGR!STOREMGR_StartBootPhase BootPhase=1 (PrevBootPhase=0) FSDMGR!AutoLoadFileSystems: CurrentBootPhase=1, LoadFlags=1 FILESYS: Starting device and waiting for boot file system. OSAXST1: >>> Loading Module 'device.dll' (0x83F889EC) at address 0xC0380000-0xC0384000 in Process 'NK.EXE' (0x8247BC80) OSAXST1: >>> Loading Module 'devmgr.dll' (0x83F88B24) at address 0xC0390000-0xC03AF000 in Process 'NK.EXE' (0x8247BC80) OSAXST1: >>> Loading Module 'k.ceddk.dll' (0x83F88C5C) at address 0xC0600000-0xC060A000 in Process 'NK.EXE' (0x8247BC80) OSAXST1: >>> Loading Module 'pm.dll' (0x83F88DA4) at address 0xC03E0000-0xC0400000 in Process 'NK.EXE' (0x8247BC80) *** DLL_PROCESS_ATTACH - Current Process: 0x42, ID: 0x400002 *** Fil+InitDeviceFileSystems FSDMGR!MountTable_t::RegisterVolumeName: Registered "$device" at index 5FSDMGR!MountTable_t::RegisterVolume: Registered volume at index 5 (Name="$device", MountFlags=0x1)FSDMGR!MountTable_t::RegisterVolumeName: Registered "$bus" at index 6FSDMGR!MountTable_t::RegisterVolume: Registered volume at index 6 (Name="$bus", MountFlags=0x1)-InitDeviceFileSystems: esys: Loaded device.dll FILESYS: Waiting for device manager to signal BootPhase1 completion. status is 1 Ceddk!CalibrateStallCounter: Enter Ceddk!CalibrateStallCounter: Could not find stall counter Ceddk!BeginCalibration: min(1194) max(1326) Ceddk!BeginCalibration: Calibration timed out (51 tries). Defaulting to 1 ms resolution. PlatformValidatePMRegistryreturningGDA::Chennai::Power Thread Started RunningDEVICE!DevloadInit DEVICE!InitDevices: Root Key is Drivers\BuiltIn. DEVICE!RegReadActivationValues RegQueryValueEx(Drivers\BuiltIn\Prefix) returned 2 DEVICE!RegReadActivationValues RegQueryValueEx(Drivers\BuiltIn\BusPrefix) returned 2 OSAXST1: >>> Loading Module 'busenum.dll' (0x83F7C0C0) at address 0xC03D0000-0xC03D8000 in Process 'NK.EXE' (0x8247BC80) DEVICE!RegReadActivationValues RegQueryValueEx(Drivers\BuiltIn\CgcePrep\BusPrefix) returned 2 OSAXST1: >>> Loading Module 'cgceprep.dll' (0x83F75BAC) at address 0xC0E10000-0xC0E15000 in Process 'NK.EXE' (0x8247BC80) ERROR!!! Calling SetKMode ERROR!!! Calling SetKMode DeviceFolder::LoadDevice(Drivers\BuiltIn\CgcePrepDEVICE!RegReadActivationValues RegOpenKeyEx(Notify) returned 2. DEVICE!I_ActivateDeviceEx: can't find all required activation values in 'Notify' ) last 90 TicksDEVICE!RegReadActivationValues RegQueryValueEx(Drivers\BuiltIn\PCI\Prefix) returned 2 DEVICE!RegReadActivationValues RegQueryValueEx(Drivers\BuiltIn\PCI\BusPrefix) returned 2 OSAXST1: >>> Loading Module 'pcibus.dll' (0x83F75CE4) at address 0xC0C60000-0xC0C7A000 in Process 'NK.EXE' (0x8247BC80) ATAPI:PCIConfig!DeviceConfig+(1) PCIBUS!PCICfgAllocIoSpace: Failed to place Device resource: Bus 0, Device 31, Function 3 ATAPI:PCIConfig!DeviceConfig+(1) ATAPI:PCIConfig!DeviceConfig+(1) ATAPI:PCIConfig!DeviceConfig+(1) ATAPI:PCIConfig!DeviceConfig+(1) ATAPI:PCIConfig!DeviceConfig+(1) OSAXST1: <<< Unloading Module 'atapi.dll' (0x83F75EDC) at address 0xC04C0000-0xC04E8000 in Process 'NK.EXE' (0x8247BC80) OSAXST1: >>> Loading Module 'atapi.dll' (0x83F75EDC) at address 0xC04C0000-0xC04E8000 in Process 'NK.EXE' (0x8247BC80) ATAPI:PCIConfig!DeviceConfig+(2) OSAXST1: <<< Unloading Module 'atapi.dll' (0x83F75EDC) at address 0xC04C0000-0xC04E8000 in Process 'NK.EXE' (0x8247BC80) OSAXST1: >>> Loading Module 'atapi.dll' (0x83F75EDC) at address 0xC04C0000-0xC04E8000 in Process 'NK.EXE' (0x8247BC80) ATAPI:PCIConfig!DeviceConfig+(3) OSAXST1: <<< Unloading Module 'atapi.dll' (0x83F75EDC) at address 0xC04C0000-0xC04E8000 in Process 'NK.EXE' (0x8247BC80) DEVICE!RegReadActivationValues RegQueryValueEx(Drivers\BuiltIn\PCI\Instance\ALI14531\BusPrefix) returned 2 OSAXST1: >>> Loading Module 'atapi.dll' (0x83F6609C) at address 0xC04C0000-0xC04E8000 in Process 'NK.EXE' (0x8247BC80) DEVICE!RegReadActivationValues RegQueryValueEx(Drivers\BuiltIn\PCI\Instance\ALI14531\Device0\BusPrefix) returned 2 DEVICE!LaunchDevice: Init() failed for device 0xd004ae70 DEVICE!I_ActivateDeviceEx: couldn't activate: prefix DSK, index 1, dll atapi.dll, context 0xd029cf20 DEVICE!RegReadActivationValues RegQueryValueEx(Drivers\BuiltIn\PCI\Instance\ALI14531\Device1\BusPrefix) returned 2 DEVICE!LaunchDevice: Init() failed for device 0xd004b070 DEVICE!I_ActivateDeviceEx: couldn't activate: prefix DSK, index 1, dll atapi.dll, context 0xd029cf20 DEVICE!RegReadActivationValues RegQueryValueEx(Drivers\BuiltIn\PCI\Instance\ALI14531\Device2\BusPrefix) returned 2 FILESYS: Waiting for device manager to signal BootPhase1 completion. DEVICE!LaunchDevice: Init() failed for device 0xd004b270 DEVICE!I_ActivateDeviceEx: couldn't activate: prefix DSK, index 1, dll atapi.dll, context 0xd029cf20 DEVICE!RegReadActivationValues RegQueryValueEx(Drivers\BuiltIn\PCI\Instance\ALI14531\Device3\BusPrefix) returned 2 DEVICE!LaunchDevice: Init() failed for device 0xd004b470 DEVICE!I_ActivateDeviceEx: couldn't activate: prefix DSK, index 1, dll atapi.dll, context 0xd029cf20 DeviceFolder::LoadDevice(Drivers\BuiltIn\PCI\Instance\ALI14531) last 6365 TicksDeviceFolder::LoadDevice(Drivers\BuiltIn\PCI) last 10275 TicksDEVICE!RegReadActivationValues RegOpenKeyEx(Notify) returned 2. DEVICE!I_ActivateDeviceEx: can't find all required activation values in 'Notify' FILESYS: Waiting for bootable file system to be mounted. FILESYS: Waiting for bootable file system to be mounted. FILESYS: Waiting for bootable file system to be mounted. FILESYS: Waiting for bootable file system to be mounted. Tag: GetTickCount in debug builds Tag: 101389
  - 5
    - BUG: Windows CE 5.0 Update 070430_2007M04 April 2007 QFE I have just spent the best part of three days working out why my platform rebuilt from source control has stopped working. The answer is that the Microsoft PB 5.0 QFE for April 2007 has updated the source files for the default bus driver (defbus.h, defbus.cpp) but has *NOT* provided an update for the precompiled library files (defbuslib.lib, defbuslib.pdb) as is normal practice. Therefore, when you recompile a BSP where the code includes "defbus.h" and links to "defbuslib.lib" you have a mismatch between the library implementation of class DeviceFolder, and what your compiled code assumes!!!! As the class now has a new member variable, this breaks the implementation of the functions that are fully defined in the header file. The problem manifested itself by: sometimes causing memory violation exceptions, and, when no exception, not fully loading all of the detected devices on a bus (mine is PCI bus). The reason being is that the linked list of device folder is broken. WORKAROUNDS: 1. In Platformbuilder, open a workspace and navigate to PUBLIC\COMMON \OAK\DRIVERS\BUSENUM in the FileView tab. Right click and select "Build current project". Do this for both DEBUG and RETAIL builds, and repeat for all of the processors you need to support. Now SYSGEN your platform, specifying "clean before build". -or- 2. Clone the code in PUBLIC\COMMON\OAK\DRIVERS\BUSENUM\BUSDEF into your BSP using SysgenCapture (search the help for how to do this). Modify your existing drivers to use your local copy of "defbuslib.lib", then rebuild your BSP. Then SYSGEN your platform, specifying "clean before build". Regards, Andrew. Tag: GetTickCount in debug builds Tag: 101373
  - 6
    - Unable to expand the directories under PLAFORM in PB window Hi All I need some help regarding the issue which i am facing..i cant expand the directory under the WINCE500\PLATFORM from the wince plaform builder tool's window...ie no bsp is visible under platform. though they are actually there in the G:\wince500 folder(when i browse through the directory by exploring the correct path ), but i cant see it in PB window.... what can be the reason and the correct solution. I am able to buid the workspace successfully. i have tried to reinstall the PB tool but to no help. If someone has faced such a problem and forund the solution plz help me . thanks in advance regards Parsh Tag: GetTickCount in debug builds Tag: 101371
  - 7
    - What happened to all the posts from 6/6? Should I post again? Will it be possible to see them? Tag: GetTickCount in debug builds Tag: 101368
  - 8
    - 128MB SDRAM Configuration Hi All, I'm working on Mainstone II BSP with PXA270 on WinCE 5.0 Platform. My image (Nk.bin) works well when the SDRAM is configured for 64MB. When I configure the SDRAM for 128MB, It just hangs at the following point, EbootSendBootmeAndWaitForTftp ****** OEMVerifyMemory checking physical range [ 0xA0100000 ==> 0xA0DCF3D3 ]... ****** RAM address ****** rom_offset=0x0. ROMHDR at Address 80100044h Download successful! Jumping to image at 0x80101000 - physical 0xA0101000 Got EDBG_CMD_JUMPIMG Got EDBG_CMD_CONFIWindows CE Kernel for ARM (Thumb Enabled) Built on Jun 24 2004 at 18:25:00 ProcessorType=0411 Revision=7 sp_abt=ffff5000 sp_irq=ffff2800 sp_undef=ffffc800 OEMAddressTable = 80106154 Sp=ffffc7cc PXA Configuration: MDCNFG Register --- 0x88000AD1 MDRFER Register --- 0x2093A01E MDMRS Register --- 0x00000000 I have posted my config.bib and oemaddress table for the reference: MEMORY IF IMGFLASH! ; Name Start Size Type ; ------- -------- -------- ---- RSVD 80000000 000FF000 RESERVED ARGS 800FF000 00001000 RESERVED NK 80100000 03000000 RAMIMAGE RAM 83100000 04FFFFFF RAM ENDIF IF IMGFLASH ; Name Start Size Type ; ------- -------- -------- ---- RSVD 80000000 000FF000 RESERVED ARGS 800FF000 00001000 RESERVED NK 94C80000 03F00000 RAMIMAGE RAM 80100000 03F00000 RAM ENDIF ; Reserve ZBANK virtual block (No physical memory ; is required to back this virtual range). ; ZBANK 90700000 00100000 RESERVED CONFIG IF IMGFLASH ROMSTART = 94C80000 ROMSIZE = 03F00000 ROMWIDTH = 32 ELSE AUTOSIZE = ON ENDIF KERNELFIXUPS=ON ; @CESYSGEN IF !NK_NKNOCOMP COMPRESSION=ON ; @CESYSGEN ENDIF !NK_NKNOCOMP ; @CESYSGEN IF NK_NKNOCOMP COMPRESSION=OFF ; @CESYSGEN ENDIF NK_NKNOCOMP IF IMGPROFILER PROFILE=ON ELSE PROFILE=OFF ENDIF OEMAddrtable DCD 0x80000000, 0xA0000000, 128 ; SDRAM bank 0 (64MB). DCD 0x88000000, 0x5C000000, 1 ; Internal memory storage(256KB). DCD 0x88100000, 0x58000000, 1 ; Internal memory control. DCD 0x88200000, 0x4C000000, 1 ; USB host. DCD 0x88300000, 0x48000000, 1 ; Memory control Memory-mapped registers. DCD 0x88400000, 0x44000000, 1 ; LCD Memory-mapped registers. DCD 0x88500000, 0x40000000, 32 ; peripherals Memory- mapped registers. DCD 0x8A500000, 0x3C000000, 16 ; PCMCIA S1 common memory space. DCD 0x8B500000, 0x38000000, 32 ; PCMCIA S1 attribute memory space. DCD 0x8D500000, 0x30000000, 1 ; PCMCIA S1 I/O space. DCD 0x8D600000, 0x2C000000, 16 ; PCMCIA S0 common memory space. DCD 0x8E600000, 0x28000000, 32 ; PCMCIA S0 attribute memory space. DCD 0x90600000, 0x20000000, 1 ; PCMCIA S0 I/O space. DCD 0x90700000, 0xE0000000, 1 ; Zero-bank (in reserved slot - no physical memory required). DCD 0x90800000, 0x14000000, 1 ; nCS5: eXpansion board header. DCD 0x90900000, 0x10000000, 1 ; nCS4: Ethernet controller. DCD 0x90A00000, 0x0A000000, 1 ; nCS2 (upper half): 2MB SRAM. DCD 0x90B00000, 0x08000000, 1 ; nCS2 (lower half): Board registers (FPGA). DCD 0x90C00000, 0x04000000, 64 ; nCS1: Storage(64MB). DCD 0x94C00000, 0x00000000, 64 ; nCS0: Boot Flash1 (64MB). DCD 0x00000000, 0x00000000, 0 ; end of table Also, RAM is contiguos. Am i missing any configuration here??? Tag: GetTickCount in debug builds Tag: 101367
  - 9
    - VIA CN700 Direct 3D Hardware support Hi again to all, we use a JetWay J7F2WE1G5D based on VIA CN700 ChipSet + integrated S3 Unichrome Pro graphics, we tried WinCE 5.0 and 6.0 with all the last update but we are unable to make work the Direct 3D hardware driver (if there is inside the BSP from VIA, no word that say NO 3D). All the 3D Test work using 3D reference driver (-ref parameter) with WinCE 5.0 but not with 6.0, the problem reported is always "unable to create D3DM device" There is someone that have an idea ?? Thanks and regards -- Massimo B. (Italy) R & D department Tag: GetTickCount in debug builds Tag: 101366
  - 10
    - ce 6.0 bsp clone error Hi, all? I'm trying to clone a ce 6.0 bsp to another one. Curiously the original bsp has nor catalog directory and .pbcxml file. But the bsp can be shown at pb 6.0 and I can create a project using the bsp. But when I try to clone the bsp, there happen the following error at the cloning process. "Could not find a part of the path 'C:\wince600\platform\mynewbsp\catalog\mynewbsp.pbcxml'. " How can I solve this error? Is there anybody to help me? Tag: GetTickCount in debug builds Tag: 101365
  - 11
    - Application hangs Hi, I am working with wince 5.0 and PXA270 mainstone II platform. I am running an application which executes some tests(like SD/CF Card read/write, Get wifi signal strength, Audio play etc..like this some test cases) continuously. I am printing "started" before start of first test and printing "end" after last test.After executing the last test again it will execute first test. Means it will print started..end started ..end continuously. This application executed successfully upto 2 hrs after that it is hanging. It is hanging after printing "end"( Task bar and application is hanging . I am not getting any exception in hyperterminal or any fatal error in the application) so i cant able to get the reason for hanging. Can any one tell what may be the reason ? Are there any wince tools are there to debug this issue? Thanks in advance Tag: GetTickCount in debug builds Tag: 101363
  - 12
    - Wince application hangs Hi, I am working with Wince 5.0 and PXA 270 mainstoneII platform. I am running one applicatin which executes some tests (like SD/CF card read/write tests, get wifi signal strength,Audio play etc.. like this some many tests) continuously. I am printing "started" before first test and printing "end" after last test.After executing last test again it will execute the first test .This will happen continuously. Means it will print started..end ..started..end .. This application is running successfully upto 2 hrs after that it is hanging( Task bar and application is hanging. I am not getting any exception in hyper terminal or fatal error in the application while hanging). I cant able to get the reason for this hanging. Can any one tell me what may be the reason. Are there any wince tools are there to debug this issue?? Thanks in advance Tag: GetTickCount in debug builds Tag: 101361
  - 13
    - about .rc file control hi. i have one question. i want to change control panel(power). so i define one vaulue in MYPROJECT.BAT file. the define value is "PLATCFG_BATTERY=1". of course set to MYPROJECT.CMN file. after i checked this value in "\CLPMAIN\power.cpp" result is define TRUE. but i checked this value in cplmain.rc file. result is define FALSE. how to control .rc file? under code is my test code. - MYPROJECT.BAT SET PLATCFG_BACKUPBATTERY=1 - power.cpp #ifdef PLATCFG_BACKUPBATTERY RETAILMSG(1,(_T(" [PM:(power.cpp)] PLATCFG_BACKUPBATTERY is define \n"))); // enter here #else RETAILMSG(1,(_T(" [PM:(power.cpp)] PLATCFG_BACKUPBATTERY is not define \n"))); #endif // PLATCFG_BACKUPBATTERY - cplmain.rc IDD_BATTERY DIALOG DISCARDABLE 0, 0, 132, 140 STYLE DS_CONTROL | WS_CHILD | WS_VISIBLE | WS_CLIPSIBLINGS BEGIN #ifdef PLATCFG_BACKUPBATTERY LTEXT "Charging",IDC_STATIC_CHARGE_MAIN,4,40,122,8 CONTROL "Progress2",IDC_PROGRESS_MAIN,"msctls_progress32", PBS_SMOOTH | WS_BORDER,12,59,102,9 LTEXT "0",IDC_STATIC,5,59,10,8 LTEXT "100",IDC_STATIC,116,59,13,8 LTEXT "Charging",IDC_STATIC_CHARGE_BACK,5,98,122,8 CONTROL "Progress2",IDC_PROGRESS_BACK,"msctls_progress32", PBS_SMOOTH | WS_BORDER,12,117,102,9 LTEXT "0",IDC_STATIC,5,117,10,8 LTEXT "100",IDC_STATIC,116,117,13,8 GROUPBOX "Main Battery",IDC_STATIC,0,24,131,51 GROUPBOX "Backup Battery",IDC_STATIC,0,81,131,51 #else LTEXT "Main battery",IDC_STATIC_MAIN,5,43,43,8 LTEXT "Charging",IDC_STATIC_CHARGE_MAIN,6,52,122,8 LTEXT "Backup battery",IDC_STATIC_BACK,5,53,49,8,NOT WS_VISIBLE GROUPBOX "",-1,25,42,105,6 GROUPBOX "",-1,53,53,74,6,NOT WS_VISIBLE CONTROL "Progress2",IDC_PROGRESS_MAIN,"msctls_progress32",PBS_SMOOTH | WS_BORDER,12,63,102,9 LTEXT "0",-1,5,63,10,8 LTEXT "100",-1,116,63,13,8 LTEXT "Charging",IDC_STATIC_CHARGE_BACK,5,64,122,8,NOT WS_VISIBLE CONTROL "Progress2",IDC_PROGRESS_BACK,"msctls_progress32",PBS_SMOOTH | NOT WS_VISIBLE | WS_BORDER,12,75,102,9 LTEXT "0",-1,5,75,10,8,NOT WS_VISIBLE LTEXT "100",-1,116,75,13,8,NOT WS_VISIBLE #endif no entered "#ifdef PLATCFG_BACKUPBATTERY" construction. what kind of need another control? plz...advice to me. aaplks@hotmail.com Tag: GetTickCount in debug builds Tag: 101360
  - 14
    - Win CE 5.0 Yearly Update (through 12/31/2004) iHello, I want to get the updates for 2004, the link on the WIn CE Home page has been changed to the Download page and this MSI is not available or cannot be found. Does anyone have a copy of this ? Thanks Aidan Tag: GetTickCount in debug builds Tag: 101355
  - 15
    - need help trying to integrate IPSM Hi all, I'm trying to include Intel PSM in our system, but with no success. There are many things that I don't know, or don't understand. We work with windows CE 6.0, PXA270, MAINSTONEIII bsp, P30 single 64MB flash. We have IPSM version 4.0. We work with MCPII_MODULE. The reason we are using PSM is because we want to be able to save some small text files in flash memory. No more than that. I worked according to the instructions in the Porting Guide of the PSM. I calculated the flash starting address according to the table in oemaddrtab_cfg.inc. In the table it is 0x9AA00000, but this is cached. In ifm_sys.c I need to put an uncached address, therefore it is 0xBAA00000. (As far as I understand the gap between them - 0x20000000- is set by DUAL_MAP_OFFSET). But in what situations do I have to change this value? I didn't specify a full map of the flash, only what I need. I only have one SA (Sub-Array), which I located in the address 59MB after flash start, and gave it a size of 4MB(1MB is left for safety). This way I don't touch the boot and the image code. For our needs 4 MB is much more than enough. I don't know whether it's ok to do it like that. In the file psmfsd.reg In the section which is "no root no hive" I erased all extras, and now there is only "PSM1", with volume name "IPSM1". In the other sections of that same .reg file I only changed the volume name to "IPSM1". I don't really understand what I have to write in the batch file- mainstoneiii.bat. Do I need to set ROOT, HIVE_REGISTRY or both? (as of now they're both set). What I want is that when the system comes up, I'll be able to see the directory "IPSM1". I don't really care whether it's inside "My Device", or anywhere else, I just want to be able to know where it is, be able to insert files inside it, write some text to these files, and the files be saved in flash. And what about checking some check-boxes in the catalog? Which ones need to be checked? As of now what I have checked is from Storage Devices\MSFlash Drivers\Intel StrataFlash NOR Driver , from File Systems and Data Store\File System-Internal\RAM and ROM File System, from File Systems and Data Store\Registry Storage\Hive-based Registry. Are these correct? Should I check some others? What happens now in my system is that there is no IPSM in it. I wait until after the system comes up, and then try to look for the IPSM directory, and of course, I can't find it. Probably because it isn't thereâ?¦. Please help me in solving this problem. Thank you all very much for your time Tag: GetTickCount in debug builds Tag: 101349
  - 16
    - build query hi all, I am working in applicaton development on top of bluetooth stack. wince has given some sample drivers in the following path: C:\WINCE500PUBLIC\COMMON\OAK\DRIVERS\BLUETOOTH\SAMPLE In the workspace if I see in the file view these are defaultly excluded from the build. How I can make these are part of my image. by including to the build. Any body who knows about this pls reply me. Thanks and regards, srikanth Tag: GetTickCount in debug builds Tag: 101343
  - 17
    - Attach emulator to Visual studio 2005 Hello, I cant attach my emulator from Platf. Builder with Visaul studio 2005. I have followed all the steps of the topic http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms228708(vs.80).aspx but it still doesn't works. I launch the emulator with PB and I execute the ConmanClient2.exe and the MCaccept.exe and then I run Tools-> connect to device in the VS2005. but it fails ( after some time) and says "activesync is not instaled". I have configured the VS2005 Tools->Options->device with the IP of the emulator, I also have changed my PC IP address to be in the same network than the emulator ( I dont know if it's necessary).. but it doesn't work. I have also tried enabling and disabling KITL as I have read somewhere... I don't know what I'm doing wrong. The only thing I doubt is about the "target" combobox in the Platform builder, witch I have set to "CE device" ( if I set it to Windows CE 5.0 device when I try to attach it fails with: Warning: Debugger service map is set to none. If your image has debugging support it may not boot properly. Cannot access selected Device from service host. Debugger could not initialize connection. The Kernel Debugger is waiting to connect with target. The Kernel Debugger has been disconnected successfully. ) any idea? thank you very much and sorry for my english Tag: GetTickCount in debug builds Tag: 101338
  - 18
    - catalog query hi all, This is srikanth. I am writing application to test USB driver in the wince 5.0 and I am using intel PXA27x platform (Mainstone II board). I am having very basic doubt in the wince: In the right side catalog items these are the main components: 1. BSP's 2. CORE O.S 3. DEVICE DRIVERS 4. PLATFORM MANAGER. In the BSP's/ INTEL PXA27x Dev Platform: ARMV4, there is a usb host is there, In the CORE O.S/Wince Devices, USB Host Support is there, and in the DEVICE DRIVERS, there is USB Host is there. What is the difference between these three USB Hosts? Any body having idea please differentiate clearly. If I want to test the USB Driver (Let suppose PEN Drive (usb Mass-storage device) by adding componets to the O.S design view. Which host I need to add to the o.s design. and at the same time for client driver: which componet I need to add to the o.s design. i.e I want to test usb driver by using the pen-driver by opening the pendrive and creating a files in that, or open a file in the pen-drive by using application program. I am not getting any icon or any indication in the desktop when I attatch a USB device(pen drive) to the usb port of the intel board. In our board touch screen is not working, only display we can able to see. In my application I used create file function. The code snippet is shown below: int WINAPI WinMain(HINSTANCE hInstance, HINSTANCE hPrevInstance, LPTSTR lpCmdLine, int nCmdShow) { HANDLE hFile; hFile = CreateFile((LPCTSTR)"\\USB Disk", GENERIC_WRITE| GENERIC_READ, 0, 0, OPEN_EXISTING, FILE_ATTRIBUTE_NORMAL, NULL); if( hFile == INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE ) { DEBUGMSG(1, (L"File not Copied successfully*************")); } else { DEBUGMSG(1, (L"File Copied successfully*************")); } return 0; } The createfile was giving invalid handle, because of path was not correct. what path I need to mention in the createfile function. Any body who is having idea on this please reply me. Thanks and regards, srikanth Tag: GetTickCount in debug builds Tag: 101337
  - 19
    - Wince Application is hanging Hi all, I am working with WINCE 5.0 and PXA 27X . I am running one application which will run some tests (like Audio play, SD and CF Card read/write,get wifi signal strength etc..like this so many tests are there) continuously. After the test is executed ,again it will start executing from first test. This should happen continuously. I am printing "started" before start of first test and "end" after last test. The application is running continuously fine for some duration (2 hrs)after that the application is hanging after displaying "end".(Task bar and application is hanging .It is not showing any exception in the hyper terminal or it is not giving any fatal application error) So i cant able to find what test is causing this problem. Because it is hanging after "end" .i am not getting any hint. Can anyone suggest What may be the problem ,how to debug this.Is there any wince tools are there to resolve this issue. Thanks in advance Tag: GetTickCount in debug builds Tag: 101336
  - 20
    - Display problem using ddi_hflat.dll I am using a board that uses SH7760 processor with onboard epson S1D13806 controller for graphics display. I am successful in bringing up the NK.bin by modifying the ddi.c in the OAL to initialize the epson controller. I am able to see the Wince startup screen with start button and taskbar on the LCD display. To verify the working of the hflat driver, a sample application was executed at the OS startup. I have a problem, the display is refreshing abnormally from top to bottom. The LCD resolution is 640 * 480, 8BPP, 60Hz frequency. I saw the previous post on similar issues, but those are not helping me. The same settings are working perfectly on Vxworks. Is there anything related to FQCR settings in the OAL/STARTUP/Startup.src file that i need to make? any pointers on this would be greatly helpful. Tag: GetTickCount in debug builds Tag: 101331
  - 21
    - wavedev2 driver - multiple channels and sw mixer I have an unusual audio setup! I have three stereo audio output channels (I2S) that I need to support from one CE 6 audio driver. I don't want to do any mixing or volume control of the signals, the "codec" will do that. One application will give me data at 8kHz which I will always need to upsample to 44.1kHz and pass onto the codec on a particular I2S pin. Another will supply 11.025kHz data which I again need to upsample to 44.1kHz and output always on a particular I2S pin. The third application will supply 44.1kHz data which I need to output on a third fixed I2S channel. I intend to support this by returning that my wavedev2 driver supports three output channels in response to the WODM_GETNUMDEVS message, then the application software can supply the correct device ID in calls to waveOutOpen. I have a couple of questions: 1) I understand that I can't use the swmixer because I have more than one output channel? So, I wanted to indicate that my driver can support 8kHz, 11.026kHz and 44.1kHz rates directly, then do the sample rate conversion inside my driver. However, it doesn't appear that I can indicate in a WAVEOUTCAPS that the driver can cope with 8kHz data - only 11.025, 22.05, or 44.1 looking at the defines in mmsystem.h Could I use the swmixer? I don't want it mixing any of the audio streams together, but maybe I could rely on it to do the upsampling? 2) Is there a better way of allowing application software which audio output channel to open when the driver supports several? Regards, Matthew Tag: GetTickCount in debug builds Tag: 101323
  - 22
    - USB mouse Can I connect one USB mouse or any other device into (mini)USB of my Windows CE device and get its input by code? I only need to connect a simple (physical) on/off button into my Windows CE to input a start/stop when my application is running so that is can do something due to this input: any idea? Mhaxx Tag: GetTickCount in debug builds Tag: 101319
  - 23
    - SYSGEN :****** B A T C H R E C U R S I O N exceeds STACK limits ****** Hi all, Do anybody know what this error is for ??? CEBUILD: Running sysgen preproc (for COMMON) Starting sysgen phase for project ( common ) ****** B A T C H R E C U R S I O N exceeds STACK limits ****** Recursion Count=1239, Stack Usage=90 percent ****** B A T C H PROCESSING IS A B O R T E D ****** PlatX_2430 - 0 error(s), 0 warning(s) ========== Build: 1 succeeded or up-to-date, 0 failed, 0 skipped ========== i am getting this error whenever I am trying to sysgen the platform (with all options i have tried out) I dont wanna re-install the platform builder so please if anybody knows it that will be great help to me. :) Thanks, Nagesh Tag: GetTickCount in debug builds Tag: 101318
  - 24
    - bsp clone error Hi, when i try to clone mainstone bsp with ce 6 i get Could not find file 'C:\WINCE600\platform\MainTest\catalog\MainTest.pbcxml'. error. Thanks Tag: GetTickCount in debug builds Tag: 101316
  - 25
    - *_NotInstalled.txt files after installing QFEs We (and our customers) are constantly having problems with QFEs not installing properly: Even when starting from a fresh PB 5.0 installaion and installing QFEs in the proper order, the '\WINCE500\Updates'-folder contains '*_NotInstalled.txt' files, that show that some files of some QFEs didn't get installed. At first we thought it was because the installation routine of such a QFE has found that the patches (or newer ones) to the respective files have already been installed, but we have seen cases where new files (for Net CF 2.0) should have been added, but just weren't installed at all. It seems to make a difference whether we install, e.g. the 2006 RollUp or the monthly 2006 QFEs (in order), whether 2004/2005-RollUps are installed or not, etc. Unfortunately the most obvious way of installation (PB5 -> RollUp2006 -> monthly 2007) does not necessarily result in the least '_NotInstalled'-files. The best result I was so far able to achieve is 'PB5 -> RollUp 2004 -> RollUp 2005 -> Monthly 2006 -> Monthly 2007' but even then 2007M01 and 2007M02 resulted in patches not getting installed (IP and WMT for 2007M01 and DirectX for 2007M02). What is going on here? This is really annoying, because each time one of our customers wants to use one of our BSPs it is a long-time trial-and-error phase until the customer has a QFE combination that works. Can anyone help? Tag: GetTickCount in debug builds Tag: 101313

In Sue Loh's precursor to what is now the Windows CE Base Team Blog,
she mentions functionality incorporated into Windows CE debug builds
designed to catch misuse of the GetTickCount function:

GetTickCount - Truth and Fiction
http://blogs.msdn.com/sloh/archive/2005/04/05/405724.aspx
"To help catch such errors in applications and drivers, Windows CE
does a little thing on debug builds - it initializes the tick count
such that it rolls over 3 minutes after boot."

I am not seeing this on my Windows CE 4.2 x86 debug build. Two
questions:

1) Where did this start in Windows CE (which version), or is it BSP-
specific?
2) How can I do this manually for my debug build?

Any help would be appreciated as the alternative is to wait ~50
days. :)

Top

Re: GetTickCount in debug builds by Bruce

Bruce
Fri Jun 08 09:52:05 CDT 2007

Initialize CurMSec to a large number in OEMInit()

--
Bruce Eitman (eMVP)
Senior Engineer
beitman AT applieddata DOT net

Applied Data Systems
www.applieddata.net
An ISO 9001:2000 Registered Company
Microsoft WEP Gold-level Member

"John S." <john.spraul@apisoftwareinc.com> wrote in message
news:1181311817.542358.116100@n4g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
> In Sue Loh's precursor to what is now the Windows CE Base Team Blog,
> she mentions functionality incorporated into Windows CE debug builds
> designed to catch misuse of the GetTickCount function:
>
> GetTickCount - Truth and Fiction
> http://blogs.msdn.com/sloh/archive/2005/04/05/405724.aspx
> "To help catch such errors in applications and drivers, Windows CE
> does a little thing on debug builds - it initializes the tick count
> such that it rolls over 3 minutes after boot."
>
> I am not seeing this on my Windows CE 4.2 x86 debug build. Two
> questions:
>
> 1) Where did this start in Windows CE (which version), or is it BSP-
> specific?
> 2) How can I do this manually for my debug build?
>
> Any help would be appreciated as the alternative is to wait ~50
> days. :)
>

Top

Re: GetTickCount in debug builds by John

John
Fri Jun 08 14:22:54 CDT 2007

Thank you for your help. If anyone is willing clarify the following I
would feel more comfortable understanding the change. I do not have
much experience deciphering BSP hierarchies.

1) Does it matter if I modify CurMSec before or after InitClock()/
anything within OEMInit()? (Should it just be the first thing?)

2) OEMInit() in \PUBLIC\COMMON\OAK\CSP\I486\OAL\cfwpc.c?
(Since the platform is x86 & appears to be based on the GEODE
platform, which appears to inherit from CEPC.)

3) Where is CurMSec actually defined / initialized? I could not find
an actual variable definition for CurMSec except in LoadCEPC.

Thanks again!

On Jun 8, 9:52 am, "Bruce Eitman [eMVP]"
<beitman.nos...@applieddata.net.nospam> wrote:
> Initialize CurMSec to a large number in OEMInit()
>
> --
> Bruce Eitman (eMVP)
> Senior Engineer
> beitman AT applieddata DOT net
>
> Applied Data Systems
> www.applieddata.net
> An ISO 9001:2000 Registered Company
> Microsoft WEP Gold-level Member
>
> "John S." <john.spr...@apisoftwareinc.com> wrote in message
>
> news:1181311817.542358.116100@n4g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
> > In Sue Loh's precursor to what is now the Windows CE Base Team Blog,
> > she mentions functionality incorporated into Windows CE debug builds
> > designed to catch misuse of the GetTickCount function:
>
> > GetTickCount - Truth and Fiction
> >http://blogs.msdn.com/sloh/archive/2005/04/05/405724.aspx
> > "To help catch such errors in applications and drivers, Windows CE
> > does a little thing on debug builds - it initializes the tick count
> > such that it rolls over 3 minutes after boot."
>
> > I am not seeing this on my Windows CE 4.2 x86 debug build. Two
> > questions:
>
> > 1) Where did this start in Windows CE (which version), or is it BSP-
> > specific?
> > 2) How can I do this manually for my debug build?
>
> > Any help would be appreciated as the alternative is to wait ~50
> > days. :)- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Top

Re: GetTickCount in debug builds by embdev

embdev
Fri Jun 08 14:49:25 CDT 2007

On Jun 8, 3:22 pm, "John S." <john.spr...@apisoftwareinc.com> wrote:
> Thank you for your help. If anyone is willing clarify the following I
> would feel more comfortable understanding the change. I do not have
> much experience deciphering BSP hierarchies.
>
> 1) Does it matter if I modify CurMSec before or after InitClock()/
> anything within OEMInit()? (Should it just be the first thing?)
>
> 2) OEMInit() in \PUBLIC\COMMON\OAK\CSP\I486\OAL\cfwpc.c?
> (Since the platform is x86 & appears to be based on the GEODE
> platform, which appears to inherit from CEPC.)
>
> 3) Where is CurMSec actually defined / initialized? I could not find
> an actual variable definition for CurMSec except in LoadCEPC.
>
> Thanks again!
>
> On Jun 8, 9:52 am, "Bruce Eitman [eMVP]"
>
>
>
> <beitman.nos...@applieddata.net.nospam> wrote:
> > Initialize CurMSec to a large number in OEMInit()
>
> > --
> > Bruce Eitman (eMVP)
> > Senior Engineer
> > beitman AT applieddata DOT net
>
> > Applied Data Systems
> > www.applieddata.net
> > An ISO 9001:2000 Registered Company
> > Microsoft WEP Gold-level Member
>
> > "John S.&qu