Is there something wrong with the way I'm setting up this rule? I set
it up to forward every message I receive to "people or distribution
list" and have it forwarded to my gmail address. Now when it gets
forwarded a copy of the sent email is placed in my inbox. Is there any
way I can eliminate this redundant step?

Re: Using rules to forward Outlook email to Gmail - getting forwarded email showing up in inbox by Milly

Milly
Mon May 05 20:54:44 PDT 2008

What you want is a redirect, not a forward. Outlook rules do not allow =
for a redirect.

--=20
Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook]

Post all replies to the group to keep the discussion intact. All
unsolicited mail sent to my personal account will be deleted without
reading. =20

<vlasala@gmail.com> wrote in message =
news:d575e481-8f30-42a4-87cb-9effdb16f183@34g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
Is there something wrong with the way I'm setting up this rule? I set
it up to forward every message I receive to "people or distribution
list" and have it forwarded to my gmail address. Now when it gets
forwarded a copy of the sent email is placed in my inbox. Is there any
way I can eliminate this redundant step?

Re: Using rules to forward Outlook email to Gmail - getting forwarded by vlasala

vlasala
Tue May 06 05:18:24 PDT 2008

On May 5, 11:54 pm, "Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook]"
<mil...@donteventhinkaboutemailingmeatmvp.org> wrote:
> What you want is a redirect, not a forward. Outlook rules do not allow for a redirect.
>
> --
> Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook]
>


I was doing this for a couple of years with a different email address
and I never got a copy of the forwarded email in my inbox or sent box.
I didn't save that rule to refer to it but there must be a way to
eliminate that unnecessary email since I already have the original in
my inbox.

Re: Using rules to forward Outlook email to Gmail - getting forwarded by vlasala

vlasala
Tue May 06 05:25:34 PDT 2008

On May 5, 11:54 pm, "Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook]"
<mil...@donteventhinkaboutemailingmeatmvp.org> wrote:
> What you want is a redirect, not a forward. Outlook rules do not allow for a redirect.
>
> --
> Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook]
>
> Post all replies to the group to keep the discussion intact. All
> unsolicited mail sent to my personal account will be deleted without
> reading.
>
> <vlas...@gmail.com> wrote in messagenews:d575e481-8f30-42a4-87cb-9effdb16f183@34g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
>
> Is there something wrong with the way I'm setting up this rule? I set
> it up to forward every message I receive to "people or distribution
> list" and have it forwarded to my gmail address. Now when it gets
> forwarded a copy of the sent email is placed in my inbox. Is there any
> way I can eliminate this redundant step?

well I just set up another rule to send all forwarded emails to that
specific email address to the deleted folders. This seemed to clear up
the problem of the forwarded mail showing up in the inbox. Anyone
seeing that interfering with the first rule at all?

Re: Using rules to forward Outlook email to Gmail - getting forwarded email showing up in inbox by Diane

Diane
Tue May 06 07:22:47 PDT 2008

is outlook downloading your gmail too?

--
Diane Poremsky [MVP - Outlook]
Author, Teach Yourself Outlook 2003 in 24 Hours
Need Help with Common Tasks? http://www.outlook-tips.net/beginner/
Outlook 2007: http://www.slipstick.com/outlook/ol2007/

Outlook Tips by email:
dailytips-subscribe-request@lists.outlooktips.net

Outlook Tips: http://www.outlook-tips.net/
Outlook & Exchange Solutions Center: http://www.slipstick.com
Subscribe to Exchange Messaging Outlook newsletter:
EMO-NEWSLETTER-SUBSCRIBE-REQUEST@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM



<vlasala@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:d575e481-8f30-42a4-87cb-9effdb16f183@34g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
> Is there something wrong with the way I'm setting up this rule? I set
> it up to forward every message I receive to "people or distribution
> list" and have it forwarded to my gmail address. Now when it gets
> forwarded a copy of the sent email is placed in my inbox. Is there any
> way I can eliminate this redundant step?