Re: Distribution Lists by Ed
Ed
Wed Jul 09 07:04:16 PDT 2008
Are they using cached mode, and, if so, is their offline address book
configured for full synchronization of all details? Is the synchronization
up to date?
--
Ed Crowley MVP
"There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems."
.
"Andy White" <whitean@bupa.com.nospam> wrote in message
news:u2EKyvZ4IHA.3396@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
> Hi Dave,
>
> When the owner looks at the DL is blank but when I look at it all is fine.
> None of the members are "hidden" all should be visible. No permissions
> have change and I have even made sure they have full permissions to the
> DL. If I remove the owner from the permissions, apply it and then re add
> them it resolves the issue for a couple of days but then comes back again.
>
> Cheers
>
> Andy
>
> "DaveMills" <DaveMills@newsgroup.nospam> wrote in message
> news:ep9774p6foq64cb0vsivmqpdak7lfk0i6q@4ax.com...
>> What sort of problems? Can see the member when they should not be able to
>> or not
>> see them when they should or something else.
>>
>> On Tue, 8 Jul 2008 13:23:01 +0100, "Andy White" <whitean@bupa.com.nospam>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>Hi All,
>>>
>>>Wasn't sure which would be the best group to post this in.........
>>>
>>>We seem to be having some issues with people viewing distribution list
>>>members. The members are not hidden and if I remove the persons
>>>permissions
>>>and reapply them it seems to rectify the problem for a little while. I
>>>don't
>>>know if it is coincidence or not but most of the people having a problem
>>>seem to be listed as the manager of the DL. I have looked and followed
>>>the
>>>article about setting the permissions in security rather than on the
>>>managed
>>>by option but this doesn't seem to make a difference.
>>>
>>>This is all running on Exchange 2003 in a cluster with outlook 2003
>>>clients
>>>
>>>Any ideas?
>>>
>>>TIA
>>>
>>>Andy
>>>
>> --
>> Dave Mills
>> There are 10 type of people, those that understand binary and those that
>> don't.
>
>