(Apologies if I'm in the wrong place; feel free to point me elsewhere if
so...)

I have an application currently [still] running on a Windows 200 server.
Client [socket] connections to this application are established using
the host name. The underlying hardware is falling out of its support
contract, so I need to move the application to something shiny and new[er].

My problem is one of timing.

On "Moving Day", I could just move the server application and then spend
the next few days or weeks helping people reinstall their client
application, pointing them to the new host.

I would prefer something a little less intense, along these lines:

Leading up to "Moving Day", my users would reinstall the client
application, but pointing at "another name" for my current host. I'm
thinking a NetBios alias, because my users also access file shares on
the same host.

On "Moving Day", I would move the server application and then "move" the
"other name" across to the new host so that clients, already using the
"other name", would just work.

Does this sound reasonable? practical? barking mad?

Any advice gratefully received ...

TIA,
Phill W.

Re: Server migration - NetBios alias? by JediK9

JediK9
Sun Dec 30 06:46:52 PST 2007

Hi Phil,

I had to do this at a place I worked at to ensure things like statis drive
mappings and apps using UNC paths didn't all fallover. Quite a normal thing
to do. You can go one of two ways with this (That I know of).

1. Just create your WINS alias as a static entry (make sure you use the
right service type)
2. Do it in the registry of the new server (ie .. it will masquerade as the
old server name). Check out http://www.jsifaq.com/SF/Tips/Tip.aspx?id=0062

NB - Using a DNS alias won't work as an alias for NetBIOS based activity
such as file/printer share mappings etc.
NB - For consistency, when you create the WINS alias (if you opt for this
method), I'd also create the same alias in DNS.

Hope that helps
Rgds
JediK9

"Phill W." <p-.-a-.-w-a-r-d-@-o-p-e-n-.-a-c-.-u-k> wrote in message
news:fk8b1b$3v4$1@south.jnrs.ja.net...
> (Apologies if I'm in the wrong place; feel free to point me elsewhere if
> so...)
>
> I have an application currently [still] running on a Windows 200 server.
> Client [socket] connections to this application are established using the
> host name. The underlying hardware is falling out of its support
> contract, so I need to move the application to something shiny and
> new[er].
>
> My problem is one of timing.
>
> On "Moving Day", I could just move the server application and then spend
> the next few days or weeks helping people reinstall their client
> application, pointing them to the new host.
>
> I would prefer something a little less intense, along these lines:
>
> Leading up to "Moving Day", my users would reinstall the client
> application, but pointing at "another name" for my current host. I'm
> thinking a NetBios alias, because my users also access file shares on the
> same host.
>
> On "Moving Day", I would move the server application and then "move" the
> "other name" across to the new host so that clients, already using the
> "other name", would just work.
>
> Does this sound reasonable? practical? barking mad?
>
> Any advice gratefully received ...
>
> TIA,
> Phill W.