Domain User get another profile

Tutorials Win: Microsoft Windows Forum

- Previous
  - 1
    - Networking and System Administration support http://www.getphpbb.com/phpbb/ittechsupport.html Tag: Domain User get another profile Tag: 234007
  - 2
    - Network password I try to get connected with my laptop and the login comes up asking for a password. I have never set a password for it. How can I get through ??? Tag: Domain User get another profile Tag: 234004
  - 3
    - AD client server communication mechanism Hi there, In W23 server AD will the client PC(XP, W2K) query login servers across all my enterprise if my subnet DC is down? Also question re. browsing company wide resources across servers, is the client PC doing the query or the server on behalf of the client. What communication ports are used for AD? Thank you, T Tag: Domain User get another profile Tag: 234000
  - 4
    - cannot see a computer in My Network Places Hi eveyone! I have this issue that has been going on for about 8 months now and i CANT seem to resolve it. If you can help it would be GREAT! ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Issue: I Have a computer on a remote network that cannot be seen on my windows 2000 server (in My Network Places). HOWEVER, you can type the netbios name in directly and access all the shares on that remote computer. ALSO, you can access the remote computer's shares by typing in the IP address. You can obviously ping the remote computer as well ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ I have been told that it has to do with the browser service, but I dont know how the heck that works (I have printed out the microsoft document, but it was just too confusing) and no-one can give me step-by-step instructions on how to resolve my issue. If someone can help i would be overjoyed!! :D Many Thanks Matt Tag: Domain User get another profile Tag: 233999
  - 5
    - Coservers and Virtual server not communicating Hi, We have installed Everrun FT of Marathon server on windows 2003 servers. The Coservers and the virtual servers have been configured. Also, a workstation has been configured to connect to the virtual server. The Virtual Server is speaking to the CoServers and the workstation. But, the Coservers and the workstation are not speaking to the virtual servers. Could you please advice me on the changes to be done. Thanks and Regards, Ashwini Anil Tag: Domain User get another profile Tag: 233997
  - 6
    - setup shared pcs I have setup 2 PCs identically. Both have Windows 2000 Professional. Both PCs are sharing a router for Internet access. I have mapped the both hardrives to the other PC to make sure I have some kind of emergency way in...(hopefully). What I would like to do is allow users to login to either PC and their profile to be shared as one common profile so that regardless of which PC they login to, they will see the same profile information... ie. "My Documents" for the user that is logged in would synchronize? to the other PC. Is there a way of doing this? Is there an more viable solution? Thank you, Eugene Tag: Domain User get another profile Tag: 233994
  - 7
    - Auto start up I am told there are about 20 - 30 specific places where a program can hide in the registry and be automatically started up when the system boots. Can anybody list all these places? Tag: Domain User get another profile Tag: 233992
  - 8
    - Laptop does not allow access. I have a small network at home. Once networked in a workgroup each computer can see the others. I have a desktop (1) and two laptops (lets call them computers 2 and 3). Laptop 2 is a HP machine and Laptop 3 is a toshiba. Brand has nothing to do with the problem. Laptop 2 shows up on the network neighborhood directories of the others, but, when the other computers try to access laptop they get the following message. "\\jmlaptop is not accessible. The network path was not found. When I ping the laptop I get it just fine and Laptop #2 can access both of the other coputers just fine. I think I have fixed this before by reinstalling tcp/ip drivers. Any insight would be greatly appreciated. JMAC out Tag: Domain User get another profile Tag: 233991
  - 9
    - VPN Authentication to my Domain The issue is that my 10+ remote users connect to my network via a Nortel Contivity Client. The remote users are members of my Domain, but use cached accounts to logon to their laptops since the Domain/Controllers are not available. Once logged on they connect to the Network via the VPN client. They are connected to the network, but are not authenticated via the DC/Domain. My question is since they logon first, then connect to the network, how can I make the remote machines authenticate to the domain post logging on and using VPN software other than Microsoft and Ras? I have tried to map drives using IP addresses, but the users are prompted for credentials to access the mappings, which that session ends every time they logoff. I would like the remote users to be able to access everything they have permissions to access as if they were connected locally. Iâ??ve tried using the LMHost file to point to the DC and the TCP/IP Advanced setting to point to the DNS server, but that doesnâ??t seem to work to authenticate as if they were local, and they would need to reload it post logon. Also, I want to make this automated so the users donâ??t have to run any special commands, they just have to connect to the VPN and have everything at their finger tips. Tag: Domain User get another profile Tag: 233990
  - 10
    - One device, two networks Is it possible to get two virtual networks on one device with some software/options? Scenario: i have one wifi card on my PC and I want to have to separate (virtual) devices: one for Internet connection and one for LAN, with proper routing of course. How can i do that? Thanks in advance, Wojciech Tag: Domain User get another profile Tag: 233989
  - 11
    - User profile and logon script doesn't work over VPN I've been setting up an office with 4 clients using VPN to connect to a remote server. The whole idea is to get the user folders centralised so no matter what computer they're on they have the same files, as they move from the LAN to the remote office from time to time. I've got the VPN connection to work just fine. I can browse the LAN without any latency, but the profile settings does not apply when logging in. I want the 'profile' tab in AD to apply for VPN connected users, in the same manner as for the LAN users today. But I can't get it to work, and I've been all over the net trying to find a solution. The closest I get is this: http://www.microsoft.com/technet/archive/community/columns/inside/techan26.mspx?mfr=true (the topic RRAS, DUN, and the disappearing login script) This doesn't solve my problem though. I'd like to find a solution where I force the client to use the profile tab in AD. If I understand the above article correctly, it's a matter of a 5 second time-out. Is there no way to edit that time-limit? By editing the registry or whatever works... Tag: Domain User get another profile Tag: 233986
  - 12
    - Sharing folders Hello, I have two folders shared in one PC (main PC). I connect to these folders from other PCs (secondary PCs) without any problem. But every time I shut down the main PC, the two folders I share, appears as not shared, and it is neccessary to share them again. I don't want to repeat this operation every time I have to shut down the main PC.Any solution? Thank you very much Tag: Domain User get another profile Tag: 233984
  - 13
    - windows 2000 cannot remote desktop connect to windows 2003 I replaced a winnt domain controller with windows 2003 in mixed mode. The windows 2003 server can remote desktop connect to the windows 2000 and windows 2003. However, windows 2000 cannot remote desktop connect to windows 2003 but can remote desktop to windows 2000. Is there a way to allow windows 2000 server to remote desktop connect to windows 2003? Tag: Domain User get another profile Tag: 233978
  - 14
    - how many connections are allowed to a xp or w2k pro share? there are about 15 clients (dos/98/2k) connected to a win98 "server". if they take out the 98 server and put in xp or w2k pro, will there be grief trying to get all users connected again? For some reason I'm guessing the limit is 10? but is that physical computers or is that 10 users? can I have 15 computers with 1pc -user1 1pc -user2 1pc -user3 1pc -user4 1pc -user5 1pc -user6 1pc -user7 1pc -user8 1pc -user9 and 6 pc's logging in as user10? thanks in advance Tag: Domain User get another profile Tag: 233970
  - 15
    - Logon failure: The user has not been granted the requested logon type I had trouble of getting error: "Logon failure: The user has not been granted the requested logon type at this computer" And I was just fadeup with the same. Microsoft "help" did not helped me (as usual). But this helped me: Open local security policy: Start -> Programs -> Administrative Tools -> Local Security Policy OR Start -> Run -> "secpol.msc" <enter> OR Start -> Run -> "gpedit.msc" <enter> -> Computer Configuration -> Windows Settings And then: Security Settings -> Local Policies -> User Rights Assignment Doube click "Access this computer from the network" and check that EVERYONE is added to the list. If not add it. I am posting this because many many guys have faced this trouble and hoping this would help them all. ~Atul D. Patil Tag: Domain User get another profile Tag: 233969
  - 16
    - Windows time service Hi I have a Windows 2000 professional workstation that can't connect to the network. It errors service not installed. I have looked at the error log for joining the domain it errors on the windows time service not installed. Where can I download or how to install the service on this work station? It is service pack 4 installed. Thanks Tag: Domain User get another profile Tag: 233967
  - 17
    - Need Recommendations for USB KVM Switches We have a special use network with that'll need six USB KVM switches. I was using Belkin PS/2 KVM switches but the reviews for Belkin USB KVM switches aren't very good. On Amazon IOGEAR USB KVM switches seem to get good reviews. Any recommendations for USB KVM switches? Thanks, tom Tag: Domain User get another profile Tag: 233965
  - 18
    - SERVICES.EXE CPU 100% on enable/disable network connection I have a dell laptop running windows 2000 pro that every time the Local Area Network connection is enabled or disabled SERVICES.EXE utilizes 100% CPU for about a minute to a minute and a half. Then the laptop returns to normal. Any help is greatly appreciated. Chet Cook Tag: Domain User get another profile Tag: 233963
  - 19
    - Windows 2000 and Netgear with Bigpond Cable We have bigpod cable and the wireless works on two machines with XP but not on the two wireless machines running 2000 and using Netgear adapters Wg111 and WG511t. Windows 2000 has service pack 4 installed. We have changed the settings in Internet Explorer to automatically detect settings under connections, we have uninstalled and reinstalled softeare for Netgear. Both machines work hard-wired into the modem through a Ethernet cable. What are other options? Tag: Domain User get another profile Tag: 233956
  - 20
    - New Server Hi Guys not sure if this is the right place but here go's. We are planning the replacement of one of our existing servers and as part of this migration we also need to change the name of the device to comply with our new naming standards, my question is how can this be accomplished. I have tried creating a DNS and WIN entry for the old server but pointing them at the new servers IP address, this does work but the test users are being prompted for their login credentials and even then they provide them they are still unable to access the new server. Any help would be appreciated. Murray Tag: Domain User get another profile Tag: 233951
  - 21
    - A a client from other client with computer name in win server 2003 i am able to access any client with ip address but cant able to access any client with their name. i am using won Xp as client With win server 2003 .Please any body help me. Tag: Domain User get another profile Tag: 233945
  - 22
    - How to disable "Network Path Not Found" on Start-Up I have my desktop and laptop computers connected together in a peer-to- peer network with Windows 2000. Each morning when I turn on my computers, whichever one I turn on first stalls with a message that says something like "Cannot connect to computer B." Well, of course computer A can't connect to computer B because I haven't gone down to the other end of my apartment to turn on computer B yet. I can't very well be in two places at once can I? In the meantime, of course, Windows stops loading until I come back to the first computer and click a button to continue loading the operating system. There's also a little box that says something like "do not try to restore the connection in the future." Which I dutifully check each time. But the following morning the same thing happens all over again. How can I configure my network connection so that it will not stall Windows start up each morning when I turn on my computer? I'd like to be able to turn on my computer, go the the kitchen to fix a cup of tea and come back to find the operating system loaded and ready to get to work, instead of finding it stalled at that "can't find other computer" roadblock. Ideally I'd like Windows Networking to just wait its turn, and then after the operating system has finished loading, it could check for the network connection, and if it's not found, to just keep checking at regular intervals until I turn on the other computer. Can that be done? Will in Seattle a.k.a. "Clueless" Tag: Domain User get another profile Tag: 233939
  - 23
    - VPN web traffic I connect into my work through VPN and I would like to redirect my web and newsgroup traffic through my internet connection rather than through the VPN connection. Can someone explain how to do this in Windows 2000 professional please? I have a straightforward broadband connection through my adsl router - no proxy servers, etc... Thanks Tag: Domain User get another profile Tag: 233937
  - 24
    - Win2K "forgets" mapped drive I have two computers, a desktop and laptop, connected together in a Win2K peer-to-peer network. The desktop is a Micron brand and the laptop is a Sony VAIO, so on the VAIO I map the Micron C: drive to M:, and on the Micron I map the VAIO drive to V:. M: for Micron; V: for Vaio; that's easy to remember. At least for me it is. But my computers keep "forgetting" the mapped drives. So, more often than not, each morning when I reboot, the mapped drives have disappeared from the drive listings under "My Computer" in Windows Explorer. And I have to remap them all over again each morning. How can I make those drive letter mappings "stick"? Will in Seattle a.k.a. "Clueless" Tag: Domain User get another profile Tag: 233931
  - 25
    - M'I`5,Persecuti on ' my respons e to th e harassm ent -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- -= my response to the harassment. -= -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- My first reaction. in 1990/91 was to assume that if I broke contact then they would not be. able to follow and would lose interest. So I did the things that have been suggested. by other people; I sold my television, stopped listening. to the radio and tried to withdraw away from the sources of abuse as much as possible.. I reasoned that they must have more important things. to deal with and that normal people would simply leave me alone if it were made difficult for them to continue. their harassment. I reckoned without the sheer vindictiveness. of the abusers. They did not let up but instead "got to" people around me,. mainly people at work, to do their dirty work for them. I went. to see my GP, who refused to believe what he was being told, and refused to direct me on. to anyone who could be of practical assistance. It was not until three years had passed. that the GP admitted the matter. was outside his competence and suggested going to the police. In the summer of. 1994 we called in counter-surveillance experts from a private detective agency to sweep our house and telephone. for bugging devices. They conducted a thorough search and found nothing;. but as noted above, since the. existence of surveillance was being forced in my face by the harassers, you would. expect them to have taken the possibility of a counter-surveillance sweep. into account when planning the type of devices to be. employed. In Easter 1995. I made a complaint to my local Police station in London, but the police have. not expressed any intention to do anything about the continuing harassment ("we're not. saying it's happening and we're not saying it isn't happening" were the. words used). I think the officer I spoke to at Easter wasn't aware of. it happening, although other members of the police force. obviously do know. From April 1995 until the. present time the matter has been discussed in a lot of detail on the Usenet. (Internet) "uk.misc" newsgroup. That discussion has given birth to the. article which you are now reading. My hopes in posting to. Usenet were that wider publicizing would discourage the security services from continuing. their harassment, and "draw people out" into concurring with the truth of what. was being said. Neither of those have followed, but the discussion has served a. purpose in allowing this structured report to be. created. 9038 Tag: Domain User get another profile Tag: 233930
- Next
  - 1
    - M,I-5,Persecut ion pur pose in pu blicizing it; censorsh ip in u k.* newsgrou ps -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= -= purpose in publicizing it;. censorship in uk.* newsgroups -= -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= The postings to uk.misc newsgroup generated a very defensive reaction. from Usenet readers in the UK.. So much so, that they tried strenuously to suppress what. was being said, both by breaking the rules of netiquette in their responses on the forum, and directly by action to revoke. the account from. which the postings were issued. Yet the postings were within the normal. boundaries of behaviour for uk.misc, and. other less partisan spectators did not see justice in the censorship which was effected, as the following. excerpt shows; :Karen. Lofstrom (lofstrom@lava.net) wrote :>It. does seem that the frequency and the size of his posts are :>approaching. net abuse. However, IMHO, they aren't quite there yet. If :>his postmaster were to act in this instance, it would. raise troubling :>censorship. issues. The inescapable conclusion of the. censorship effected on the uk.* newsgroups is that the British are intent on their wrongdoing. remaining concealed, and therefore seek to subvert and. suppress freedom of speech, not only in their. own country where the media shows xenophobic bias and bile against all perceived enemies. within and without, but also in other countries which have their own statutes to. guarantee the basic human right of. free speech. It is absolutely necessary to bring their hate campaign out into the. open where it can be placed under scrutiny. and the harassers seen for what they are. That is the only way of making. it impossible for the security services to. carry it out. There is a wider dimension, though. Xenophobia as demonstrated by. British people and institutions over the last few years belongs to the same stable. as racial hatred. In one case, two youths on a Tube train made that racism explicit by referring to their. victim as a "soft toy, not. up to British Standards". Doubtless others victimize partly on the basis of race (isn?t it odd that they chose to torment someone. who is not ethnically. English?) while expressing their abuse in terms of another. genetic attribute, namely mental illness. All xenophobia on a genetic basis is wrong, but. while racial insults are illegal, abusing the mentally ill is neither against the. law nor subject to similar condemnation when it. is exposed. 6608 Tag: Domain User get another profile Tag: 233929
  - 2
    - M'I`5 Persecution ' a buse in set- up situa tions and in p ublic -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- -= abuse in set-up. situations and in public -= -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Strangers. in the street have recognized me on sight many times, and shown awareness of the current thread of abuse.. To give you one example, in 1992 I was seriously ill, and a manager. at work somewhat humorously said that "it wasn't fair" that people were bullying me.. A few days later, I attended for the first time a. clinic in London as an outpatient, and on my way out was. accosted by someone who asked if "they had paid my fare", with emphasis on the word. "fare". He repeated the word several times in this different context; that they should. have paid my "fare", each time emphasizing the word. For. two and a half years from the time their harassment started until November 1992. I refused to see a psychiatrist, because I reasoned that I was. not ill of my own action or fault, but through the stress caused by harassment, and that a. lessening of the illness would have to be consequent to a removal of its. immediate cause, in other words a cessation of harassment. I also. reasoned that since they were taunting me with jokes about mental illness, if I were to seek treatment then the. abusers would think that they had "won" and been proved "right".. Remember, the constant theme of any persecution. is, "we must destroy you because you're X", whether X is a racial or other attribute. In this case the. X was "we persecute you because you have brain disease". The similarity of this. logic to Nazi attitudes to the mentally ill is. striking. The same manager who'd said "it wasn't fair" asked me in. winter 1992 why I didn't seek help from a psychiatrist;. was it, he asked, because "they would think they had won" if I sought treatment? That was something. I'd never said at work... again, taken separately it proves nothing, but many. such things. over a period of months proves conclusively that people in the company knew what was going on, and in quite a. lot of detail. Usually. harassment in public lacks the level of finesse of "paying your fare". Most people's imagination does not go beyond moronic parroting. of the current term of denigration.. That is not surprising given the average level of. the abusers; if they do not have the intelligence to distinguish wrong from right. then neither will they have the capacity for anything other than mindless repetition of a monosyllabic term. calculated to fit into. their minds. The first incidents of verbal assault in public were in again in the. summer of 1990, although they increased in frequency and venom with time.. In July 1990 the first public. incident occurred on a tube train on the Northern line.. Two men and their girlfriends recognised me; the women sprang to my defence, saying "He looks perfectly normal, he doesn't look ill".. Their boyfriends of course. knew better, and followed the party line; one of them made reference to an "operation", apparently to work at the. tube station but implicitly to a visit that I had made. to hospital a couple of weeks previously. In August 1990 going home from college, soon after getting on. a tube train at. Gloucester Road I was followed by a group of four youths, who started a chant of abuse. That they were targeting me was confirmed by other. people in the carriage, one of whom asked the other "who are. they going on at, is it the bloke who just got on?" to which the. second replied "yes, I think so". I was tempted to reply, but. as in every other instance the abusers are enabled in their cowardice by physically. outnumbering the abused; any confrontation would result in my being beaten. up, followed by a complaint to the police that "he attacked us", and of course. he's ill, so he must have been imagining that we were getting. at him. Shitty, aren't they? But the shittiness. of the four youths on the tube train is as nothing compared to the episode on the National Express coach. to Dover in the summer of 1992.. While going on holiday to the Continent I was verbally set upon by a. couple travelling sitting a few rows behind. The boy did the talking, his female companion contributing only a continuous. empty giggling noise.. He spoke loudly to ensure other people on the coach heard, always about "they" and "this bloke" but. never naming either the abusers or the person he was. talking about. He said "they" had "found somebody from his school, and he was. always really stressed at school". They must have dug deep to find enemies there; perhaps someone who dropped out. of school, someone who didn't do too well later, who was jealous. and keen to get their own back? The boy also said "he was. in a bed and breakfast for only one night and they got him". By a not unexpected coincidence. I had been in a B&B in Oxford a week. previously, which had been booked from work; other things lead me to the conclusion. that the company's offices were bugged for most of the 2 1/2 years that. I was there, so "they" would have known a room in the B&B had been booked. (But I'll. bet "they" didn't tell the company's managers their offices. were bugged, did they?). After a few minutes. of this I went back to where they were sitting and asked where they. were travelling. The boy named a village in France, and the girl's giggling suddenly ceased; presumably it permeated. to her brain cell. what the purpose of the boy's abuse was. This and other set-up situations are. obviously calculated to provoke a direct confrontation which would bring in the. police, with the abusers claiming that they were the ones attacked.. Again in 1992, outside the house. where I was living in Oxford I was physically attacked by someone - not punched, just grabbed by the coat, with. some verbals thrown in for good measure. That was. something the people at work shouldn't have known about... but soon after a couple of people were talking right in. front of me about, "I heard he. was attacked". The UK police have a responsibility for preventing assault occurring, but they. do not seem to take any interest in meeting that responsibility. I suppose their attitude is. that harassment does. not come within their remit unless it involves physical assault, and they will only become involved. once that happens. That is of course quite the wrong attitude for them to take, but as. I now understand, the police investigate only the. crime they wish to investigate; if they do not take your complaints seriously then. there is nothing you can do to make them take. action. 4178 Tag: Domain User get another profile Tag: 233928
  - 3
    - M-I'5-Persecution . wh y w on't th e Br itish police do t heir jo b an d pu t a sto p to it? -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- -=. why won't the British police do their job and put a stop to it? -= -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- The British police obviously do know what is. taking place. Besides my interpretations. of what individual officers have said which forces that conclusion, it would be inconceivable for them to. be unaware of something on. this scale. If they know, then they will know that the abusers have broken. laws in the UK and abroad. Recently the UK introduced. laws against electronic spying which carry. a penalty of several years jail if caught. If the police know illegal. harassment is taking place, and do nothing about it, then they are failing in. their responsibilities. Last Easter (1995) I went into the local. police station in London and spoke to an officer about. the harassment against me. But I couldn't provide tangible evidence; what people said, in many cases years. ago, is beyond proof, and without something to support my statements I. cannot expect a police officer to. take the complaint seriously. The current situation with regard to the police is not one. which allows a breakthrough in dealing with the problem. On. the one hand, most individual officers at. a local police station may not know about the ongoing assaults, so a complaint at that level will. not yield results. Yet the police as an organisation do know of the harassment, and they. must be aware that a complaint has been made at a police station. So it is clearly their. duty to take preventative action against the continuing. molestation, but because the criminals are operating on behalf of a state agency,. the police are not carrying. out their duty. 1748 Tag: Domain User get another profile Tag: 233927
  - 4
    - M'I-5'Persecution ' wh y won't t he B ritish pol ice do th eir jo b a nd p ut a stop to it? -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- -= why won't the British police do their job and put a. stop to it? -= -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- The British police obviously do know what. is taking place. Besides my interpretations of what individual officers have said which forces. that conclusion, it would be inconceivable for them to. be unaware of something on this. scale. If they know, then they will know that the abusers have. broken laws in the UK and abroad. Recently the UK introduced laws against electronic. spying which carry a penalty of several years. jail if caught. If the police know illegal harassment is taking place, and do nothing about it,. then they are failing. in their responsibilities. Last Easter (1995) I went into. the local police station in London and spoke to. an officer about the harassment against me. But I couldn't provide tangible evidence; what people. said, in many cases years ago, is beyond proof, and without something to support. my statements I cannot expect a police officer to take. the complaint seriously. The current. situation with regard to the police is not one which allows a breakthrough in dealing with the problem. On. the one hand, most individual officers at a local police station may. not know about the ongoing assaults, so a complaint at that level will not yield results.. Yet the police as an organisation do know of the harassment, and they must. be aware that a complaint has been made. at a police station. So it is clearly their duty to take preventative action. against the continuing molestation, but because the criminals. are operating on behalf of a state agency, the police are not carrying out. their duty. 1748 Tag: Domain User get another profile Tag: 233926
  - 5
    - M,I`5 Persecut ion Bern ard Levi n expres ses his vie ws The article of which part is. reproduced below was penned by Bernard Levin for the Features section of. the Times on 21 September 1991. To my mind, it described the situation at the time and in. particular a recent meeting with a friend, during which I for the first time. admitted to someone other than my GP that I had been. subjected to a conspiracy of harassment over the previous year and. a half. >There is a madman running loose about London, called David Campbell; I. have >no reason to believe that he is violent, but. he should certainly be >approached with caution. You may know him by the curious. glitter in his >eyes and a persistent trembling of his hands; if. that does not suffice, you >will find him attempting to thrust no fewer than 48 books. into your arms, >all hardbacks, with a promise that, if you should. return to the same >meeting-place next. year, he will heave another 80 at you. > >If, by now,. the police have arrived and are keeping a close watch on him, >you may feel sufficiently emboldened to. examine the books. The jackets are >a model of uncluttered typography, elegantly. and simply laid out; there is >an unobtrusive colophon of. a rising sun, probably not picked at random. >Gaining confidence -. the lunatic is smiling by now, and the policemen, who >know about such things,. have significantly removed their helmets - you >could do worse. than take the jacket off the first book in the pile. The >only word. possible to describe the binding is sumptuous; real cloth in a >glorious shade of dark green, with the title and author in. black and gold >on the. spine. > >Look at it more closely; your eyes do not deceive you -. it truly does have >real top-bands and tail-bands,. in yellow, and, for good measure, a silk >marker ribbon in a lighter green.. The paper is cream-wove and acid-free, >and the. book is sewn, not glued. > >Throughout the encounter, I should have mentioned,. our loony has been >chattering away, although what he is trying to say is. almost impossible to >understand;. after a time, however, he becomes sufficiently coherent to make >clear that he is trying to sell the books to you. Well, now, such. quality >in bookmaking today can only be for collectors' limited. editions at a >fearsome price - #30,. #40, #50? > >No, no, he says, the glitter more powerful than ever and the trembling. of >his hands rapidly spreading throughout his entire body; no, no - the. books >are priced variously at #7,. #8 or #9, with the top price #12. > >At. this, the policemen understandably put their helmets back on; one of >them draws his truncheon and. the other can be heard summoning >reinforcements on his walkie-talkie. The madman. bursts into tears, and >swears. it is all true. > >And it. is. > >David Campbell has acquired the entire rights to the whole. of the >Everyman's Library, which. died a lingering and shameful death a decade or >so. ago, and he proposes to start it all over again - 48 volumes this >September and 80 more next year, in editions I have. described, at the >prices specified. He. proposes to launch his amazing venture simultaneously >in Britain and the United States, with. the massive firepower of Random >Century at his back in. this country, and the dashing cavalry of Knopf >across the water, and no one. who loves literature and courage will forbear >to. cheer. At the time. this article was written I had believed for some time that columnists in the. Times and other journalists had been making references to my situation. Nothing unusual about this. you may think, plenty of people have the same sort of ideas and obviously the papers aren't. writing about them, so why should my beliefs not be as false as. those of others? What makes this article so extraordinary is that three or four. days immediately preceding its publication, I had a meeting with a. friend, during the course. of which we discussed the media persecution, and in particular that by Times columnists. It seemed to. me, reading the article by. Levin in Saturday?s paper, that he was describing in some detail his "artist?s impression" of that meeting. Most telling are. the final sentences, when he. writes, "The madman bursts into tears, and swears it is all. true. And it is." Although I did not "burst into tears" (he seems to be using a bit of poetic licence and exaggerating) I did try hard to. convince my friend that it was all true; and I am able to. concur with Mr Levin, because, of course,. it is. At the beginning of the piece Levin reveals a fear of being. attacked by the "irrational" subject of his story,. saying "I have no reason to believe that he is violent, but he should certainly be. approached with caution". This goes back to the xenophobic propaganda of "defence" against. a "threat" which was seen at the very beginning of. the harassment. The impression of a "madman running loose" who needs to be controlled. through an agency which assigns to itself the mantle of. the "police" is also one which had been expressed. elsewhere. In the final paragraph of this. extract, his reference to Everyman?s Library as having "died a lingering and shameful death a. decade or so ago" shows clearly what. sort of conclusion they wish to their campaign. They want a permanent solution, and. as they are prevented from achieving that solution directly,. they waste significant resources on methods which have been repeatedly. shown to be ineffective for such a purpose. 1748 Tag: Domain User get another profile Tag: 233925
  - 6
    - M'I.5,Pers ecution ' Ber nard Levin expresses his vi ews The article of which part is reproduced below was penned by Bernard. Levin for the Features section of the Times on 21. September 1991. To my mind, it described the. situation at the time and in particular a recent meeting with a friend, during which I. for the first time admitted to someone other than my GP. that I had been subjected to a conspiracy of harassment over the previous. year and a half. >There is a madman running loose about London, called David. Campbell; I have >no reason to believe that he is. violent, but he should certainly be >approached with caution. You may know him by the curious glitter in. his >eyes and a persistent trembling of. his hands; if that does not suffice, you >will find him attempting to thrust no fewer. than 48 books into your arms, >all hardbacks, with a promise that, if you should return to. the same >meeting-place next year, he will heave another 80 at. you. > >If, by now, the police have arrived. and are keeping a close watch on him, >you may feel sufficiently emboldened to examine the books. The. jackets are >a model of uncluttered typography, elegantly and simply laid. out; there is >an unobtrusive colophon of a rising sun, probably not. picked at random. >Gaining confidence - the lunatic. is smiling by now, and the policemen, who >know about such things, have significantly. removed their helmets - you >could. do worse than take the jacket off the first book in the pile. The >only word possible to. describe the binding is sumptuous; real cloth in a >glorious shade. of dark green, with the title and author in black and gold >on the. spine. > >Look at it more closely; your eyes do not deceive you - it. truly does have >real. top-bands and tail-bands, in yellow, and, for good measure, a silk >marker ribbon in. a lighter green. The paper is cream-wove and acid-free, >and the. book is sewn, not glued. > >Throughout the encounter, I should have mentioned,. our loony has been >chattering away, although what he is trying to say is almost impossible. to >understand; after a time, however, he becomes sufficiently coherent. to make >clear that he is. trying to sell the books to you. Well, now, such quality >in bookmaking today can only be. for collectors' limited editions at a >fearsome price -. #30, #40, #50? > >No, no, he says, the glitter more powerful than ever and the trembling. of >his hands. rapidly spreading throughout his entire body; no, no - the books >are priced variously. at #7, #8 or #9, with the top price #12. > >At. this, the policemen understandably put their helmets back on; one of >them draws his truncheon and. the other can be heard summoning >reinforcements on. his walkie-talkie. The madman bursts into tears, and >swears it is. all true. > >And it. is. > >David Campbell has acquired the entire. rights to the whole of the >Everyman's Library, which. died a lingering and shameful death a decade or >so ago, and. he proposes to start it all over again - 48 volumes this >September and 80 more next year, in editions. I have described, at the >prices specified. He proposes to. launch his amazing venture simultaneously >in Britain. and the United States, with the massive firepower of Random >Century at his back in this country, and the dashing cavalry. of Knopf >across the water, and no one who loves. literature and courage will forbear >to. cheer. At the time this article was. written I had believed for some time that columnists. in the Times and other journalists had been making references to my situation. Nothing unusual about this you. may think, plenty of people have the same sort of. ideas and obviously the papers aren't writing about them, so why should my beliefs not be. as false as those of others? What makes this article. so extraordinary is that three or four days immediately preceding its publication,. I had a meeting with a friend, during the course of which we discussed the media. persecution, and in particular that. by Times columnists. It seemed to me, reading the article by Levin in Saturday?s paper, that he was describing in some. detail his "artist?s impression" of that. meeting. Most telling are the final sentences, when he writes, "The madman bursts into tears,. and swears it is all true. And it is." Although. I did not "burst into tears" (he seems to be using a bit of poetic licence and exaggerating) I did try. hard to convince my friend that it was. all true; and I am able to concur with Mr Levin, because,. of course, it is. At the beginning of the piece Levin reveals a fear. of being attacked by the "irrational" subject of. his story, saying "I have no reason to believe that he is violent, but he should. certainly be approached with caution". This goes back to the xenophobic. propaganda of "defence" against a "threat" which was seen at the very beginning of. the harassment. The impression of a "madman running. loose" who needs to be controlled through an agency which assigns to itself the mantle of the "police" is. also one which had been expressed. elsewhere. In the final paragraph of this extract, his reference to Everyman?s. Library as having "died. a lingering and shameful death a decade or so ago" shows clearly what sort of conclusion they wish to their campaign. They want. a permanent solution, and as they are prevented from achieving. that solution directly, they waste. significant resources on methods which have been repeatedly shown to. be ineffective for such a purpose. 6608 Tag: Domain User get another profile Tag: 233924
  - 7
    - M.I 5.Persec ution . wh o know s a bout it ? -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- -= who knows about it?. =- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Many people know, both in the establishment and media, and among. the general public. Despite an absence of its target from. the UK for more than two years, the echoes of paranoia can still be heard loud. and clear from across the water. When it started in 1990, the. only people who knew were those. in BBC television who were spying on my home, and a few radio broadcasters. There were a. few cases of public harassment, but very little compared to the situation that developed a couple of. years later. The list today includes BBC TV. staff (newsreaders such as Martyn Lewis, Michael Buerk, Nicholas Witchell), people from radio. stations such as Chris Tarrant of Capital and Radio 1 DJs, people. in the print media, but also many people in the general public.. All united in a conspiracy which breaks the laws which the UK does have regarding harassment, and. all completely uncaring for any semblance. of decency or elementary respect for individual. rights. The British police (obviously) do know the. nature of the harassment and in all probability the identity of those. behind it. Some time ago I made a complaint to my local police. station in London, without positive result. The UK police are failing in. their duty to see the law enforced in not checking. the abuse. 4178 Tag: Domain User get another profile Tag: 233923
  - 8
    - M.I 5`Persecution . h ow a nd wh y d id it st art? -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- -= how and why did. it start? -= -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- The harassment didn't start by itself, so someone must have. been there at the outset to give it. a firm push and set the "animals" after me. It looks as if I was. set up in June 1990, and the timing indicates someone from university. was responsible. >One thing which has. been missing from this discussion is this simple >prognosis: that maybe he is right and. that, despite his admitted >mental condition, there really. is a campaign against him organised by >now-influential. ex-students of his university. In May or June 1990, Alan Freeman on Radio 1 read out a letter from. someone who had known me for a few years, who wrote of the one who "wore. out his welcome with random. precision" (from the Pink Floyd song). Freeman went on to say to the writer "that's a hell of a letter you wrote. there". The indication is strongly that people I. had parted from soon before nursed a grudge against me and were trying to cause trouble. for me. The suggestion is that. Freeman might have shown the letter to other people, and things could have snowballed from there. Right from. the start the real source (security. services presumed) didn't announce themselves as the origin, but let the "talkers", the radio DJs, believe that they. were the originators. Think about it; if you announce, "we're. MI5 and we have a campaign. against this bloke" then people might not go along with it; but if you say, "everyone else is getting. at this bloke because he 'deserves' it" then people will join in. with fewer qualms. >Why would "they" wish. to assassinate your character? It's. the classic case of hitting a cripple to prove you're stronger. Why would the security services expend hundreds of thousands of pounds and. more than six years of manpower. to try to kill a British citizen? Because they are. motivated by people who knew me at university and feel personal animosity; because they knew me to be. emotionally weak, and it is in the nature of bullies to prey on those known. to be weak; and because they can rely on the. complicity of the establishment, which the security services manipulate and. derive funding from. This is England's biggest humiliation today, and the British security services are. intent on preventing their humiliation becoming. reality by continuing their campaign of attempted murder. to suppress the truth from becoming public. 1748 Tag: Domain User get another profile Tag: 233922
  - 9
    - M-I'5-Persecutio n ` cost of the operati on -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= -= MI5: cost of the. operation -= -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Here's what a couple of other people on. Usenet (uk.misc) had to say regarding the cost of running such. an operation... PO: >Have some sense, grow up and smell. reality. What you are talking about PO: >would take loads of planning, tens of. thousands of pounds and lots of PO: >people involved in the. planning, execution and maintenance of it. You PO: >must have a very high opinion. of yourself to think you are worth it. PM: >But why? And why you? Do you realize how much it would cost to. keep PM: >one person. under continuous surveillance for five years? Think about PM: >all the man/hours. Say they _just_ allocated a two man. team and a PM: >supervisor. OK., Supervisor's salary, say, #30,000. a year. Two men, PM: >#20,000 a year each. But they'd need to work in. shifts -- so it would PM:. >be six men at #20,000 (which with on-costs would work out at more like PM: >#30,000 to the employer.). PM:. > PM: >So, we're talking #30,000 x 6. #180,000. plus. say, #40,000 for the PM: >supervisor. #220,000. Then you've got the. hardware involved. And PM: >any transcription that needs. doing. You don't think the 'Big Boss' PM: >would listen to hours and hours. of tapes, do you. PM:. > PM: >So, all. in all, you couldn't actually do the job for much less than PM: >a quarter million a year.. Over five years. What are you doing that makes PM: >it worth the while of the state to spend. over one and a quarter million PM: >on. you? Those are pretty much the sort of calculations that went through. my head once I stopped to consider what it must be costing them to run. this operation.. The partial answer is, there have been periods when the intensity has been greater, and times when little. has happened. In fact, for much of 1993 and the first half of 1994, very. little happened. Although I don't think that was for reasons of money -. if they can tap into the taxpayer they're not going to be short of resources,. are they? The more complete answer is in the enormity of what. they're doing. Relative to the cost. to British pride of seeing their country humiliated for the persecution of their own citizens, isn't is worth the cost of. four or five people to. try to bring things to a close in the manner they would wish? To the government a million or. two is quite honestly nothing - if they can convince themselves of the necessity of what they're doing,. resources will not be the limiting. factor. 9038 Tag: Domain User get another profile Tag: 233921
  - 10
    - M'I-5,Persecu tion ' Capi tal R adio - C hris Tarra nt -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-= -= Capital Radio - Chris. Tarrant -= -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-= Capital Radio DJs have been "in on it" from the. start. One of the first things I heard in the summer of 1990. was from a Capital DJ who said, "If he listens to Capital then. he can't be all bad" (supportive, you see. We're not bastards). Much of what. came over the radio in 1990 is now so far away the precise details have. been obliterated by time. No diary was kept of the details, and although. archives if they exist may give pointers, the ambiguity of what broadcasters. said would leave that open to re-interpretation. In spring 1994, Chris Tarrant on his Capital morning show. made an aside to someone else in the. studio, about a person he didn't identify. He said, "You know this bloke? He. says we're trying to kill him. We should be done for attempted. manslaughter". That mirrored something I had. said a day or two before. What Tarrant said was understood by the staff member. in the studio he was saying it to; they said, "Oh no, don't. say that" to Tarrant. If any archives exist of the morning show. (probably unlikely) then it could be found there; what he said was so out of context. that he would be very hard put to find an explanation. A couple. of days later, someone at the site where I was working repeated the remark although in a different way; they said there. had been people in a computer room when automatic fire extinguishers. went off and those people were "thinking of suing for. attempted manslaughter". Finally, this isn't confined to the. established radio stations. In 1990 after I had listened to a pirate radio station in South. London for about half an hour, there was an audible phone call in. the background, followed by total silence for a few moments, then shrieks of. laughter. "So what are we supposed to say now? Deadly torture? He's going to talk to us now,. isn't he?", which meant that they. could hear what I would say in my room. 6608 Tag: Domain User get another profile Tag: 233920
  - 11
    - M`I,5.Per secution ` b ugging and counter- surveillance -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- -= MI5: bugging and. counter-surveillance -= -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- PO: >Did you ever look for the bugs in your house ? If not, why not ? I. mean if PO: >I thought that was happening to me, I'd search the. place from top to bottom, PO: >I mean I live there I would know. if anything was out of place. If I was PO: >really suspicious, I would call in. one of those bug detection teams which PO: >have. those machines that pick up the transmitted radio waves. This PO: >reminds me of BUGS, that new programme on. BBC1 on That's exactly. what we did. We went to a competent, professional detective agency in. London, paid them over 400 quid to debug our house. They used scanner devices which go to over 1 GHz and would. pick up any nearby transmitter. in that range, they also checked the phones and found nothing... but if the. tap was at the exchange, then they wouldn't find anything,. would they? CS: >Doesn't this suggest to you that. there are, in fact, no bugs to be found? You. can assume that they've done this sort of thing to other people in more "serious" cases,. where they would know the targets would suspect the presence of electronic surveillance.. So they will have developed techniques and devices which are not readily detectable either by visual. inspection or by electronic means.. What those techniques might be, I couldn't guess. In this case, the existence of bugging devices was. clear from the beginning,. and they "rubbed it in" with what was said by the boy on the coach. It was almost as if they wanted counter-surveillance. people to be called in, who they knew would fail. to detect the bugging devices, causing loss of credibility to the other things I. would have to say relating to the harassment. I. did all the things someone in my situation would do to try to find the bugs. In. addition to calling in professional help using electronic counter-surveillance, I made. a close visual inspection of electrical equipment, plus any points where audio. or video surveillance devices might have. been concealed. Of course, I found nothing. Normal surveillance "mini-cameras" are quite noticeable and require. visible supporting circuitry. It seems to me the best. place to put a small video surveillance device would be additional to a piece of. electronic equipment such as a TV or video. It. would be necessary to physically break in to a property to fit such a. device. 4178 Tag: Domain User get another profile Tag: 233919
  - 12
    - M I.5 P ersecution , t he BBC, telev ision a nd rad io -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-= -= the BBC, television. and radio -= -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-= The first incident. in June 1990 was when a BBC newsreader made what seemed to be a reaction to something which had happened in my home, and out. of context of what they. were reading. My first reaction was disbelief; nothing of the. sort had ever happened before, the idea that such a thing could occur had not crossed my mind, yet there was no doubt. of what had just taken place. My disbelief eroded as this. recurred time after time. Besides the. news, offenders included shows such as Crimewatch (!), Newsnight, and "entertainment" shows. There seems. to be very little moral understanding among the people who make these programmes; they. just assume they will never be caught, so they carry on without a thought for. the illegality or amorality. of what they do. The only time I ever heard a word raised in doubt was by Paxman. being interviewed by someone else (I think by Clive Anderson) back. in 1990; referring to the "watching" he said it troubled him, and when asked by the host what you could do about it, replied. "Well, you could just switch. it off" (meaning the surveillance monitor in the studio). He clearly didn't let his doubts stand. in the way of continued surreptitious spying from his own or. other people's shows, though. Now you're. convinced this is a troll, aren't you? This story has been the subject of. much debate on the uk.* Usenet newsgroups for over a year, and some readers believe it to be an invention (it has even been suggested. that a group of psychology. students are responsible!), others think it symptomatic of a derangement of the. author, and a few give it credence. Quite. a few people do know part or all of the story already, so this text will fill in the gaps in their knowledge. For the. rest, what may persuade you. of the third possibility is that some of the incidents detailed are checkable against any archives of radio and TV programmes. that exist; that the incidents involve named. people (even if those hiding in the shadows have not made their identity or. affiliations evident), and those people may be persuaded to come out with the truth; and that the campaign. of harassment is continuing today both in the UK. and on the American continent, in a. none-too-secret fashion; by its nature the significant risk of exposure increases with. time. On several occasions people said to my face that harassment from. the TV was happening. On the first day I worked in Oxford, I spent the evening in. the local. pub with the company's technical director Ian, and Phil, another employee.. Ian made a few references to me and said to Phil, as if in an aside, "Is he the bloke who's been on TV?". to which Phil replied, "Yes, I think. so". I made a number of efforts to. find the bugs, without success; last year we employed professional counter-surveillance people. to scan for bugs (see later) again without result. In autumn 1990. I disposed of my TV and watched virtually no television for the next. three years. But harassment from TV stations has gone on for over six years and continues to. this day. This is something that many people obviously know is happening; yet the. TV staff have the morality of paedophiles, that. because they're getting away with it they feel no. wrong. Other people who were involved in the abuse in. 1990 were DJs on BBC radio stations, notably disc jockeys from Radio 1 and other stations (see. the following section). Again, since they. don't have sense in the first place they can't be expect to have the moral sense not to be part of. criminal harassment. 1748 Tag: Domain User get another profile Tag: 233918
  - 13
    - Home Network I am no longer able to access my desktop computer (Windows 2000) from my laptop (Windows XP). I installed new antivirus software on my desktop computer and lost the ability to access to the desktop from the laptop. I can't remember how I set up my home network. I am still able to access the internet from my laptop. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks. Tag: Domain User get another profile Tag: 233904
  - 14
    - Windows xp firewall blocking my networked usb printer I have a winxp box and win2k box both connected to a new Netgear DG834G wired router. My printer is connected to a USB port? on the winxp box. Windows 2000 can see Winxp in My Network places, and with winxp's firewall enabled, cannot see the printer. So I disable the firewall and printer is found ok. What do or can I do to put this right: change a setting in the router, or install a different firewall? Also, and this is maybe unrelated, Winxp cannot see either itself or win2k. Thanks Tag: Domain User get another profile Tag: 233900
  - 15
    - Prioritizing Win2000 port traffic Is there a way of doing this? What I want to do is to give port 53 requests first priority then ports 22/513 second ports 25/110/995 third ports 119 fourth port 21 fifth port 80 request 6th. -- Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@nl2k.ab.ca God, Queen and country! Beware Anti-Christ rising! Merry CHRISTmas 2007 and Happy New Year 2008! CHRIST is the reason for the season! Tag: Domain User get another profile Tag: 233892
  - 16
    - I'm locked out of my Win2000 box as admin For some strange reason my administrator password was set to blank??, and now I can't login to win2k as admin, as it won't accept a blank password. I have tried logging in as admin in safe mode but same thing. I am admin in my winXP box, so is there any way I can set an admin password in win2k? Thanks Tag: Domain User get another profile Tag: 233884
  - 17
    - M,I-5'Persecut ion BB C Newscast ers L ie & Deny T heyre Wa tching Me MI5 Persecution: BBC Newscasters Lie. & Deny They're Watching Me Central to the persecution campaign waged against me for some nine. years now by the Security Service. is their use of the media, and in particular the broadcast media, to make clear to me that I am under. surveillance and being watched within. my own home, even by BBC newscasters while they read the news. This is. really an act of arrogance; MI5 and their tools in the television and radio are so sure that they can never be caught, that. they have many times made explicity clear on. broadcast programmes that they are as. capable of seeing me as I am of seeing the broadcast pictures. Even when they have. known I am taping the programmes they still carry on this practice; for examples of TVand. radio presenters caught "in action", see the Evidence area of my. website. If you wish. to reply to this article...... then please include your. name and fax number! I provide the means for recipients to send me their thoughts on the topics. discussed, but ask that you provide me with your. fax number or email address if you require a response. Also would you please send not more than. one or two pages, if by fax.. Thank-you! It started with a Newscaster,. and it continues with Newscasters today The very first incident in. the story started with a reaction by an ITN newscaster, Sue Carpenter, in June of 1990, almost nine years ago. now. She reacted to what she saw in my living room at home as. she read the news. My mother. had brought an apple for me into the room, whereupon the newsreader smirked and giggled, apparently finding this funny. I. couldn't believe what I was seeing.. I carried on watching news and other television programmes to see if presenters. would show signs of "interactive watching"; to my. surprise, this happened again and again. Unfortunately, I did not have my. wits sufficiently about me to videotape these programmes, and it is now almost impossible to obtain recordings dating back. to 1990. However, I have been. busy recording everything Ive watched the last couple of years, and the taping has yielded some. nuggets, which you will find if you point your Web browser at. the "evidence" area of my website, whose URL address is given above. Strangely it is not particularly the BBC. who are "after me" at the moment (with the. exception of occasional fire from Nicholas Witchell), but that supposed paragon of. virtue and decency Jon Snow. of Channel Four TV News (he actually works for ITN), who once claimed hed turned down MI5s offer of a tax-free. salary. I will cover Snows recent actions in a future. article. BBCs. Hidden Shame The first. ever Usenet post (internet newsgroup article) on the subject of the MI5 bugging / BBC watching occurred, as stated in a. previous article, in early May 1995. It is. reproduced here; Date: Thu May 4. 18:27:24 1995 Newsgroups:. alt.conspiracy Subject:. BBC's Hidden Shame Remember the two-way televisions in George. Orwell's 1984? The ones which watched you back? Which you could never. get rid of, only the sound could be turned. down? Well the country which brought Orwell into the. world has made his nightmare follow into the world after him. Since 1990 the British. have been. waging war against one of their own citizens using surveillance to invade privacy. and a campaign of abuse in the transmitted media in their efforts to humiliate. their "victim". I suppose "BBCs Hidden Shame". is more of a wish than a fact. It may be hidden, but the BBC and other. media and security organisations seem to have no. shame whatever in their anti-social, not to say criminal, actions. Nor do the general public, who. seem quite happy to parrot the vilest obscenities without much hesitation. or apparently thought. Martyn Lewis, Nicholas Witchell and. the rest Most of the harassment occurred. in 1990-92, when I wasnt making any recordings, and the BBC wont release copies. of current affairs programmes from that period.... so although I. can remember there were many incidents in that time, even many specifics, I cant dig up. the actual programmes to flesh out the. bones. This year, there. has been at least one incident with Nicholas Witchell as newsreader, which I have. successfully recorded and digitized, i.e. converted. into a computer Quicktime movie file. This has not yet found its way onto. my website (Im a busy man, dontcha know) but you can be sure I will let the. readership of these articles know when that clip makes it onto the web. The Witchell clip was recorded on Saturday 10 April. 1999 at 7pm, and shows Witchell trying to restrain his. features from collapsing into a. smirk. First his upper lip quivers for several minutes, then with the non-excuse of a non-joke his entire face twists. into a grin. It looks as if. he finds me so funny, that he allows himself to submerge any pretence at. professionalism in a sea of MI5-inspired sarcasm and harassment. The two BBC newscasters whose reactions. to me I can remember most vividly over the years are Martyn Lewis. and Nicholas Witchell. I can remember thinking years ago that Michael Buerk was also. seeing me at home; and if the other two are watching then there would be no reason why he. wouldnt be doing the same; but in all honesty I cannot remember. a single clear instance of his reacting through facial or verbal expression. to me. I can remember several. instances of Martyn Lewis reacting to what he saw of me,. however. In early 1992 I was watching the BBC news with Lewis on a small black-and-white portable TV at my then home in Oxford.. I threw a term of abuse at Lewis; he flinched, then gave a grin and made. a comment from which I understood that he. had been on my side, but might have changed. his mind as a result of what Id just said to him. And in spring 1991 I remember Martyn Lewis clearly reacting to what. he saw of me at my then accommodation in Woking, Surrey, by continuing. to stare at some fixed point near the camera after. the news had finished - presumably. this is where the monitor interactively showing pictures of my room was. located. Why would BBC and other Newscasters. Watch and Harass Me, Watching Them? This is a. very difficult question, and I dont actually know the answer. It is a matter of record that the Secret Services are very much part. of the Establishment. The recent exposure of the. "MI6 Agent List" on the internet, and its coverage in the newspapers, reveals how much MI5. and MI6 are recruited from the. ranks of the Establishment. Obviously the relationship. is bi-directional; the Establishment influences MI5/MI6, but the secret services (well, perhaps not so secret now we. know who works for MI6!!!) also influence. the machinery of power and information dissemination i.e. media in this country. So they must have a lot. of covert. leverage with the BBC and ITN. Some of this leverage is obviously through bribery. It is. a matter of record that. MI5 tried some years ago to "buy" Jon Snow of Channel Four TV. He turned them down - obviously they must have approached other. media people as well, and from the lack. of other reports of people turning them down, it may be presumed that some other journalists will have. accepted the sugared carrots put before them. Ironically, Jon Snow. has been taking part in the recent "watching" actions against me. - but why he has allowed himself to be used by the. secret services is something which I do not know. Perhaps the Security Service uses blackmail to twist arms of. journalists into co-operating with. them? I have always thought there was something slightly odd about Martyn Lewiss demeanour. At the time of the Ron. Davies "rough trade" scandal it was reported that MI5 had. known all about Davies predilections and the sham. of his pretence to be a happily married man. Perhaps MI5. have been able to dig something up from Martyn Lewiss private life to blackmail. him into acting on their behalf? And if there wasnt anything before the. "newscaster watching" started then there most certainly is. something now.... once theyve started watching, the newscasters will. surely wish their activities to remain covered-up, and co-operate with the security. service. "Newscaster. Watching" Deliberately Constructed to Mimic Schizophrenia Presumably this is the first case in history of television. journalists actually taking part in acts of real-time, live spying. and reacting against one of their viewers. What you have to understand, though, is. that I was quite mentally healthy in June 1990, certainly relative. to November 1992, when. after two and a half years of harassment I was finally admitted to hospital as an out-patient. MI5 decided from the outset that. they would make me mad; they. constructed the media harassment to resemble what would be reported by a person. with mental illness; and then they carried on years of abuse to inflict on me the. condition which they wished to use as an. excuse to cover up their abuses. I sold my portable TV in. autumn 1990 and stopped watching television regularly. I realise. now that this may have been a mistake. What I should have done. was to watch TV and listen to the radio, but tape-record everything and make a note. of what each excerpt meant to me. I would then be in. a much stronger position as regards to evidence that I am now. That is what I am trying. to do now, but unsurprisingly the TV/radio presenters have. stopped getting at me, now they know they are being recorded. When I started publicising my case on internet newsgroups in 1995,. I was met with the disbelief one might expect to be accorded to a. mentally ill person who talks. about "newscaster watching" and media persecution. Some newsgroup participants thought I had started. a "troll", an invention made to. obtain a reaction; one bright spark even suggested a group of psychology students were behind the articles.. But most people thought the articles were symptomatic of derangement - and. that is exactly what MI5 want people. to think. MI5 chose me as a target because I was mildly mentally ill at the outset in 1990, although I stress. my illness then was very mild. in comparison with November 1992, and because they knew that enough abuse would (a) make me much more seriously ill, and. (b) once I was more ill, they would "get away" with a harassment deliberately. constructed to look like the. symptoms of paranoid schizophrenia. Martyn Lewis Denies & Lies, But Wont in. Writing In. February 1997 I wrote to BBC Viewer & Listener Correspondence and asked them to investigate the. claim that their newscasters had engaged in "real-time spying" on. me. They replied that they had asked Martyn Lewis and Michael Buerk whether they had engaged in such. practices, and that they had both. made verbal denials to VLC, but were refusing to put their denials in. writing. To me it looks as if Lewis and Buerk are happy to lie verbally but. not in writing, because written falsehoods would. place them unambiguously in the wrong, whereas they can try to talk their way out of. verbal lies if they are ever caught, or perhaps even. deny the verbal lies completely? If they lie without shame, then why would they have any shame about. future lies about. lying? BBC-VLC. also said that the BBC "would never engage in any form of surveillance activity" such as that described.. Clearly Martyn Lewis and the. rest have lied to their own organisations personnel about their criminal actions.. So much for the "objective", "truthful" BBC, a nest of shabby. liars. Summons. against the BBC, for Nuisance caused by Newscaster Spying In March 1997. I issued a civil summons against the BBC, seeking injunction against further "newscaster spying", and token damages for. what the BBC had done to me until that date. The. purpose of the summons was to try to "smoke out" the BBC, since obviously. I did not have good evidence which would be necessary for either a civil or criminal case to be made. against them. My summons was. worded as follows; 1. The plaintiff is and was at all material. times residing at [home address]. At some time prior to. or during June 1990, persons of unknown identity entered. Plaintiff's premises and installed concealed television equipment. in said premises. 2. A campaign of harassment was launched against the Plaintiff by. the persons of. unknown identity, which in part took the form of instigating harassment by BBC. TV newscasters (including specifically Michael Buerk and Martyn Lewis) as they read news bulletins, by making. direct and personal comments. to Plaintiff. 3. The campaigns purpose was to subject Plaintiff. to great mental stress and induce mental breakdown. As a result of it Plaintiff did. indeed suffer from severe. mental strain in 1990-97. 4. In order to avoid the mental strain being caused to. him the Plaintiff has been compelled to. stop watching BBC TV news. Defendant therefore committed the tort of private nuisance, since normal. use of home was interfered. with. 5. Plaintiff claims a permanent. injunction prohibiting further nuisance, and damages for. nuisance suffered limited to 5,000. Naturally, my attempt. to smoke-out the BBC and its lying newscasters failed. The BBCs litigation. department sought to have my summons struck out; and they succeeded in. doing so, on the grounds of my action "disclosing no reasonable cause of action". I was. also prevented from issuing. further civil claims against the BBC without leave of the Court. Apparently litigants-in-person frequently / usually have. their claims struck out with this wording,. regardless of the merit of their claims. BBC Suppresses my. Claims of "Watching by Newscasters" BBCs staff magazine Ariel ran my advert "BBC Newsreaders. Spying on my home" for one issue. in the Personal category on 8/July/1997 before it was spotted. and axed by editor Robin Reynolds; please see webpage;. http://www.pair.com/spook/evidence/plaint/ariel.htm Clearly the. BBC will not allow claims of its wrongdoing to be made public in. the media channels it controls. On several occasions people said. to my face that harassment from the TV was happening. On the first day I worked in Oxford,. I spent the evening in the local pub the Rose and Crown with. the company's technical director Ian, and Phil, another employee. Ian made a few references to. me and said to Phil, as if in an aside, "Is he. the bloke who's been on TV?" to which Phil replied,. "Yes, I think so". The reader might. think that mere "watching" by newscasters etc might be a relatively benign happening. But it is not; it is part of MI5s. framework of harassment and lies. On many occasions the. reactions of the BBCs newscasters to. me has been in the nature of sarcasm, implicit contempt and abuse. This is visible in Witchells news programme mentioned. above, where he engages in abuse by laughing at me during his newsreading. It. was particularly visible in the early period of 1990-92, and. as late as Autumn 1993, when during. a Newsnight broadcast Jeremy Paxman interviewed a football person about soccer hooliganism,. and the interviewee gave vent to an unsubtle rant. about "theyre idiots, theyre just idiots, keep up the surveillance". Paxman started grinning, showing. he understood and was taking part in the abuse being perpetrated on that. programme. Conclusion The MI5 Persecution started with harassment by television newscasters,. and today. harassment by TV and radio presenters still forms a key part of MI5s activities against me. When this business started in June. 1990 I was in relatively good health of mind. Years of. persecution by the secret police and their mouthpieces in the. state-run BBC and other media eroded my health until MI5 achieved their aim of seeing me rendered mentally ill. in November 1992. The diagnosis which was forced. on me unfortunately and ironically meant that my. reports of the harassment are disregarded, because the. mentally ill are second-class citizens in todays Britain. Yet TV. and radio harassment continues, albeit in a reduced form, despite my. taping all the programmes I watch, resulting in my being able to obtain and demonstrate objectively on. the website instances of media presenters attacking me. Unfortunately. these recorded instances are quite tenuous; I might understand them, the presenters understand what it. is theyre doing, but. despite many thousands of people knowing the truth of the "newscaster watching", the. omerta continues and they continue to refuse to admit the truth of the. matter. It is a terrible indictment of British society that there is. not even one decent person willing to speak out. I look forward to the day when the. truth does finally emerge, and the mass corruption which has allowed the MI5 persecution to take place is. finally purged and the Establishment criminals. caught and appropriately punished. 5408 Tag: Domain User get another profile Tag: 233876
  - 18
    - M`I 5`Persec ution - Fo ur Y ears of MI 5 Per secution Post s on Int ernet Ne wsgroups Four. Years of "MI5 Persecution" Posts on Internet Newsgroups For approximately the first three. years of the MI5 persecution, from June 1990. until late 1992, I kept as quiet as possible, in the hope that by not reacting, MI5s interest in me would decrease and they would simply go. away of their own accord. This. is the sort of behaviour some people employ against bullies; if the bullies arent getting a. reaction, then they might simply go away. and victimize someone else. Unfortunately, this tactic didnt. work. The quieter I became, the more shrill and hysterical the noise from the Security Service. operatives. For about two years I didnt watch TV. news at all. Yet this only heightened their obsessed fixation; they continued to. follow me wherever I went, they continued to induce harassment at work. by managers and fellow workers, and they continued to encourage me. to commit suicide. They seemed to regard my refusal to react as a crime which they would have. to "put right" by ever more extreme forms. of abuse. Finally, in 1995, I changed tactics radically. Since late 1994 I had. had accounts with internet providers in Ontario,. Canada. I discovered the cornucopia of. internet newsgroups, on every topic from consumer electronics, to politics and legal topics, and I discovered. online services such as Compuserve and AOL. In. May 1995, I made the first posting to the conspiracy newsgroup, on the subject. of "BBCs Hidden Shame". BBC's Hidden. Shame The internet newsgroup discussion, which. has now reached its fourth anniversary,. started with an article in alt.conspiracy, which I reproduce here. Date: Thu May. 4 18:27:24 1995 Newsgroups:. alt.conspiracy Subject:. BBC's Hidden Shame Remember the two-way televisions in George Orwell's 1984? The ones which watched. you back? Which you. could never get rid of, only the sound could be turned down? Well the country which brought Orwell into the world has made his nightmare follow. into the world after him. Since 1990 the British have. been waging war against one of their own citizens using. surveillance to invade privacy and a campaign of abuse in the transmitted. media in their efforts to humiliate their "victim". And the most remarkable thing about it is that what they. do is not even illegal - the UK has no laws to protect the privacy. of its citizens, nor does it proscribe harassment or abuse except in the case of racial. abuse. A lot of people in England know. this to be going on, yet so far they have maintained perfect "omerta"; not a sound, not a squeak has escaped into. the English press, and for all the covert. harassment absolutely nothing has come out into the public domain. Have the British gone mad? I. think we should be told At this point, I did not name MI5 as my persecutors. I was. still unsure that they. were the ones responsible for the "psychological terrorism". In followup posts. however I did name them; and the persecutors have never denied the claim; so I think my guess is valid. (The Security. Service Tribunal in 1997 have said. "no determination in your favour was made", but it is a well established fact that MI5 lies routinely. to the Tribunal which has never found in favour of a plaintiff, so. no conclusions can be drawn from. this.) This. first post was made to alt.conspiracy, but further posts were made to the UK-local newsgroups,. in particular uk.misc but also uk.legal and uk.politics (which is now called uk.politics.misc). Some. time ago I tried to take. the battle to the Compuserve forums, UKPOLITICS (which is now called UKCURRENT - current affairs), but my articles were censored. by the forum. operators. Such censorship is impossible on the internet newsgroups. Police Refuse to. Act I have complained several times to the Metropolitan Police, who. have each time refused. to help. From: Green. <Green@guidion.demon.co.uk> Newsgroups:. uk.misc,uk.politics,alt.politics.british,soc.culture.british Subject: Re:. MI5 Persecution: Why Aren't the British Police Doing Their Job? Reply-To:. Green@guidion.demon.co.uk Date: Sun Apr 7 21:13:30. 1996 In. article <DpIE0r.736.0.bloor@torfree.net> . bu765@torfree.net "Mike Corley" writes: >Last Easter (1995) I went into the local police station in. London and spoke to >an officer about the harassment against me. But I. couldn't provide tangible >evidence; what people said, in many cases. years ago, is beyond proof, and >without something to support my statements I cannot. expect a police officer to >take. the complaint seriously. This in itself dos not suggest. that the police have it in for you. The old bill operates on extremely. tight spending limits forced on them by that pillock Michael Howard, and without evidence, they often have higher priorities than chasing. something that. cannot go to court. I doubt that the police are actually being leant on, but they probably realise. that if they looked into this, they would be leant on hard. The met. always stays away from anything that looks like. it has Defence, Security or secret service interest already, because. they realise that they are below these government agencies in the general pecking. order. If I walked. into my local nick and complained that MI5 were snooping on me, they would show me the door without even. looking at my evidence, because that bored desk seargant with only five years to go before he retires. doesn't want to start fucking about with somebody who has. incurred the wrath of Stella Rimington. He would rather deal with the lost dogs and driving licence producers, eat his cheese and pickle sandwiches and. piss off home at the end of his shift than have. some high ranking spook having a go at his boss and. getting him a bollocking. In short, you have earned much sympathy but little surprise. Just. remember that saying about the. enemy of your enemies. Most recently,. I wrote in March 1999 to Charing Cross Police Station CID. They did not acknowledge or reply to my letter. When I. phoned them up, the detective Id written to treated me to a. sadly not unusual display of police bigotry,. with an uneducated rant about "your paranoid rubbish". It would be nice to think that. such uneducated bigotry is something other than wholly typical of police. behaviour, but unfortunately that is an illusion that. is rapidly dispelled. Uncorruptible Jon Snow. of Channel Four News From previous articles the. reader will know what I think Jon Snow has recently been. watching me while he reads Channel Four News in the evening. Recently I digitized a few moments of one such. broadcast, where his face twists into a smile, without there being anything in. the news broadcast to cause merriment. Here is. a usenet post from some time ago on MI5s "bought and paid for" tools in. the so-called "free" press. Peter Harding. (harding@ermine.ox.ac.uk) wrote: : I was at speakers' corner on Sunday. There was one. chap who was bellowing : about something or other, I don't know what, but. one thing he said to :. someone caught my ear: : "BBC,. MI5, same thing." Can't disagree with. that sentiment. Wasn't. it documented that MI5 sometimes "bought" journalists and broadcasters? I remember. reading a report by some jouralist who had been offered an extra tax-free income by MI5. to become their covert mouthpiece, and had refused. ............................................................................. > : >mouthpiece, and. had refused. >. : >. : It was Jon Snow of Channel 4. > > Was. it reported in any of the papers? It has been reported several times. The most recent was in. Private Eye, a few months back.. As I recall they also wanted information from him; journalists would be a natural choice for. members of the Security Service and the Secret Intelligence Service for. information sources. > It might be interesting to see what he had. to say regarding their > attempt to recruit. him. He was most concerned that many others would have accepted. such an offer. However, we can probably make. an educated guess as to some of those who accepted: Nigel West (Rupert Allason,. MP) and Chapman Pincher would come near to the top of the. list. -- \/ David Boothroyd. Socialist and election analyst. Omne ignotum. pro magnifico. British Elections. and Politics at http://www.qmw.ac.uk/~laws/election/home.html I wish I was. in North Dakota. Next General Election must be before 22nd May '97 The House of Commons now : C 324,. Lab 272, L Dem 25, UU 9, PC 4, SDLP 4, SNP 4, UDUP 3, Ind 1, Ind. UU 1, Spkrs 4. Government majority = 1. Telephone Tate 6125. Corrupt Security Service agents steal. millions from taxpayers Money is of course a. factor in the grand equation which is the MI5 persecution. It costs money for the Security Service to "buy". people in the. media etc. But that is only a small part of their expenditure of taxpayers resources. Most of the expenditure is directly on the. salaries if the agents. involved; and in this post I put forward the theory that MI5 are trying to draw out their involvement for. as long as possible, very cynically, to maximise their income and line their own. pockets. At each stage they have tried to pretend that I am something. out of the ordinary. Either I was. very stupid ("he's an idiot") or very clever ("he's like a genius"). Either I was a threat to Western. civilization (Levin once referred to me as the next Hitler) or I was completely. defenceless ("a soft toy"). Now, it should be obvious to any person with common-sense that I am not. out of the ordinary in any way. I have an IQ which is average for the Web,. I am racially white European, and there are plenty of. other people with schizophrenia or epilepsy out there who haven't. been targeted for MI5 attention, so why me? I think the answer is that the MI5 agents who harass me have cynically. exploited the situation by painting. me as extraordinary in order to assure themselves of well-paid employment funded by the. ordinary British taxpayer. To put it bluntly, they are stealing millions of pounds from the taxpayer to. feed their own pockets. This assertion is supported by the. observation that it's the same agents who are doing the harassment. Six months ago in a local hospital I was. harassed by someone whose face I had seen (he had stared straight at me aggressively, at the. time I just thought it was some nutter. but it turns out he was one of "them") aboard a KLM flight a couple of years ago. It's presumably been the same people. most of the time. I've seen the way contractors act when they don't want their positions terminated.. Would these agents really want to lose their well-paid employment harassing me?. Presumably they are promising their bosses a "breakthrough". (ie my demise) real-soon-now and have been for the last seven years, while all the while these MI5. agents skim millions off. the taxpayer. I wouldn't mind a job like. that. Perhaps if I persecute myself a little bit, like standing in front of a mirror and shouting mindless obscenities, do. you reckon I'd get a slice of the caky. Service Tribunal. This year Nick Brooks, current Tribunal Secretary, confirmed to me that he could not think of. a single case where the Tribunal had found in favour. of a complainant. Here is my usenet post. from two years ago. Subject: MI5:. "It wasn't us" Newsgroups:. uk.misc,uk.legal Organization: Toronto. Free-Net "The. Security Service Tribunal have now investigated your complaint and have asked me to inform. you that no determination in your favour has been made on your. complaint." Signed ER Wilson, Tribunal. Secretary Well that's a relief then.. All that spamming for nothing eh. Gaw blimey, if they say. they're not doing it then it can't be them, can it? In a recent letter to Mr Brooks I expressed the opinion that. the Tribunal were unable. to fulfil their responsibilities in the face of MI5 falsehoods. Nevertheless, I do intend to make. another complaint to the Tribunal in the near future,. despite the Tribunal appearing to be a toothless. watchdog. Discrimination against a Unit. Minority MI5. have been very clear in their instructions as to what I should do. They have openly shouted at me the word "suicide", and also from. the other abuse it is clear. that they want my existence terminated. This point is covered. in more detail in a previous article. The following post describes the xenophobic nature of MI5s campaign against. me. They have refined their. bigotry down to a unit minority, yet they make use of the discrimination. against the mentally ill which is a feature of current British. society. Subject: Re: MI5 says "Kill. Yourself" Newsgroups:. uk.misc,uk.legal,uk.politics.misc,uk.media References:. <zlsiida.4248.3258FE24@fs1.mcc.ac.uk> <53eeev$cmg@axalotl.demon.co.uk> Organization: Toronto. Free-Net Distribution: iain@hotch.demon.co.uk (Iain. L M Hotchkies) wrote: >Indeed. If you've ever had a 'conversation'. with someone suffering >from florid schizophrenia, you'll know how difficult it can. be to >'argue' with. them. I. don't have florid symptoms. But I'm in a difficult situation, because those people who don't know,. aren't going to believe, and those who do, they just go along with the crowd. It's. never a good idea to go against the grain, and the grain here is defined by interests in the establishment and the media.. Even people who could say. out loud what was happening won't, because then there's a risk that. they'll be seen as traitors and ostracised. Usually this type of 'hidden abuse' is racial and targetted at. a racial minority within a country. You keep. the minorities out of the good jobs, but you don't admit. discrimination exists. It happens everywhere, not just in Britain. The persecution that. is going on now is in reality a refined form of racism. Instead of "nigger" it's. "nutter", and abusing the mentally ill is still socially acceptable today. In 50. years it might not be, but today there isn't any. social or legal sanction against it. So really they've refined racial harassment down to a minority. of one. The words may be different, but. the methods are the same. 3938 Tag: Domain User get another profile Tag: 233875
  - 19
    - M.I'5.Persecution . MI5 Waste Ta xpayer Million s on Pointl ess Hate-Cam paign MI5 Persecution. Update: Friday 30 April, 1999 If You Intend To. Reply, Please Read This Please.... keep your response to one page!. Faxes over. a page or two will be. deleted without being read. Somewhere between. 0 and 100% The last few days there have. been no clear recordable instances of abuse. However, while travelling on the. Underground, while walking around near. my home and going to friends homes, I am constantly troubled by thoughts that those people over there might be about. to get at me; that the couple sitting. in the opposite seats laughing are in fact laughing at me; et cetera, et. cetera. A comment by a scientist to the BSE inquiry sticks in my. mind. He described the. possible scale of the epidemic as "between 0% and 100%". It might not be happening, it might not. happen at all, to any discernable degree.... or it might be total. Without. clear recording, which seems to have. become impossible the last couple of weeks, there is no way of knowing. whether the harassment really is continuing, whether we have entered a temporary hiatus, or. whether perhaps it has perhaps stopped for now. But for the time. being I think there arent any reasons to dicontinue these faxes.. I only re-started them six weeks ago in response to a resumption of MI5 harassment;. and I think I will need to be more convinced of absence of persecution before I discontinue my. complaints. The Newscasters are still. watching In the last few weeks there have. been at least a couple of fairly overt instances of. "interactive watching" by newscasters. I reported this in a previous "MI5 Persecution. Update". These instances are really very rare compared to. 1990-91, when there were many dozens of such occurrences. Undoubtedly the reduction is. due to my practice of videotaping everything I see.. Recently I had the opportunity of showing this years "happenings" (Jon Snow/Nicholas Witchell) to. my psychiatrist, and he agreed that in both cases. the newscasters were expressing. merriment without visible cause, and that objectively it might be possible for my claims. to be true - although of course other people reported similar thoughts to him, and this thinking is. usually a symptom of. illness. Read About the MI5. Persecution on the World Wide Web The March 1998 issue (number 42) of. .net Magazine reviews the website describing it as an "excellent site". Since August 11, 1996 over. 50,000 people have browsed this. website. You are encouraged to read. the web pages which include a FAQ (frequently asked. questions) section outlining the nature of the persecutors, their methods of harassment through the media, people. at work and among the general. public an evidence section, which carries audio. and video clips of media and workplace harassment,. rated according to how directly I think they refer to me objective descriptions. of the state security agencies involved scanned texts of the complaints I have made to media and state. security agencies. involved posts which have been made to. netnews over the last four years on this topic Keith Hill MP. (Labour - Streatham), my elected representative, as ever refuses to. help. MI5 Waste Taxpayer. Millions on Pointless Hate-Campaign Recently. I was talking to an independent observer about the nature and purpose of the perceived campaign of persecution. against me. The person I spoke to, a highly intelligent man, said he was struck by the. utter pointlessness of the perceived campaign against me.. He also said that, if my theories were in fact true, many people would have to be. involved, in the surveillance itself, and in the technical. side of the delivery of information from my home to. TV studios for example, if the "interactive watching" were happening as described. He voiced these. thoughts without any prompting from me; but both. I and other observers had arrived at pretty much the same conclusions, some. years ago. I saw a. team of four men at Toronto Airport in 1993 To carry out the surveillance alone, full-time, would employ four or. five men, or. their equivalent in terms of man-hours. Each man would "work" an eight-hour. shift, so you would need at least three men doing the surveillance, plus a connecting link /. manager. An indicator that this estimate is correct arrived in 1993, when. I was accosted by one of a group of four men at Toronto Airport; he said, laughing, "if he tries. to run away well find him". Plainly these were the men who had. been involved in the intrusive surveillance of me for the preceding. three years. On. other occasions, I have seen the same man on two or three occasions. On one such occasion, at Ottawas Civic. Hospital in November 1996; he gave his name to the doctor as "Alan Holdsworth" or some such; my hearing is. not very good sometimes and I am not sure. of the surname, although I am sure "Alan" was his first name. I saw. exactly the same man again in Ottawa, at the airport, in. July 1998. Obviously, other people must be "working" with this person; he would not be the sole agent employed in. this case. Usenet readers views. on the Cost to MI5 of Running the Campaign Here's what a. couple of other people on internet newsgroups / Usenet (uk.misc) had. to say regarding the cost of running such an operation... PO: >Have some sense, grow up. and smell reality. What you are talking about PO: >would take loads of planning, tens of thousands of pounds. and lots of PO: >people involved in the. planning, execution and maintenance of it. You PO: >must have a very high opinion of yourself to think you are worth. it. and...... PM: >But why? And why you?. Do you realize how much it would cost to keep PM: >one person under continuous surveillance for five years? Think. about PM: >all the man/hours. Say they _just_. allocated a two man team and a PM: >supervisor. OK., Supervisor's salary, say, #30,000 a. year. Two men, PM: >#20,000 a year each. But. they'd need to work in shifts -- so it would PM: >be six men at #20,000 (which. with on-costs would work out at more like PM:. >#30,000 to the employer.) PM:. > PM: >So, we're talking #30,000 x 6.. #180,000. plus say, #40,000 for the PM: >supervisor. #220,000. Then you've. got the hardware involved. And PM: >any transcription that needs doing. You don't think. the 'Big Boss' PM: >would listen to. hours and hours of tapes, do you. PM:. > PM: >So, all in. all, you couldn't actually do the job for much less than PM: >a quarter million a. year. Over five years. What are you doing that makes PM: >it worth. the while of the state to spend over one and a quarter million PM:. >on you? Those are pretty much. the sort of calculations that went through my head once I stopped to consider what it must be costing. them to run this operation. At the very least, a quarter million. a year - and probably much more, given the. intrusive and human-resource-intensive methods employed. Times nine. years. Equals well over two million pounds - and probably much,. much more. Its wasteful. for someone with my skills to be unemployed The wastefulness of the MI5. campaign against me is not just that of futile expenditure on their side. It is also extremely wasteful. for someone with my. talents to be unemployed and on a disability pension. I am highly qualified in numerate disciplines, yet am. unable to work, specifically because of the MI5 hate-campaign against me.. It is a terrible waste of resources for a supposedly efficient economy like that of the UK to. be squandering. the talents of a skilled and capable worker. I made every effort to remain. in employment for as long as I could, but ultimately I was defeated by MI5s employment of massive. resources specifically targeted on my workplaces with the sole aim. of seeing me evicted from those. workplaces. You might expect this sort of behaviour from the. Stasi or some other secret police force in a communist country where labour is cheap, and. the governments aim on seeing its citizens confined; but for a. supposedly free and efficient economy like Britains, the wastefulness resulting both directly. and indirectly from the Security Services activities is simply. criminal, and should never be allowed. The international dimension means the costs are. multiplied many times overoer had any sense, then they have surely taken leave of them over. the last. nine years. Four. years of persecution in Canada The persecution re-started within less than. five minutes of my arrival in Canada, as documented above,. and in the "frequently asked questions" article on the website. The words, "if he. tries to run away well find him" spoken by one of the harassers at Toronto. Airport are now imprinted on my. mind. A year later I emigrated to Canada,. intending to find a job and settle there, hoping that MI5s interest. in me might dim with time. I did manage to find work there, but my hopes of avoiding Security Service. interest were ground into dust. As detailed above, I saw. the same man in November 1996 and July 1998, both times. in Ottawa. Apart from these encounters, there were numerous incidents between. 1994 and 1998 of harassment, of an identical nature and in most cases using identical. words to what had occurred in the UK. It became quite clear to me that. the permanent surveillance and harassment operation which MI5. had subjected me to in England was being. continued. For a team. of four or five men to be employed overseas must cost a lot more than. if they operate in their home country. And for MI5 to continue the operation for a period of over four. years, continuously, must cost many hundreds of thousands of pounds. This confirms my belief. that the state is funding the campaign against mehat the. Security Service receives current annual funding of #160M. Divided by 1850 staff, works. out at #86,000. But the unit. annual cost of each "watcher" must be much higher than this, especially given the frequently mobile. and overseas nature of their actions of the last few. years. A very conservative figure might be a little over #100,000 pa for each of a team of five. people, or half a million pounds per year.. For nine years, so far. So the most conservative estimate of the surveillance element alone is perhaps four. or five million pounds since. 1990. This guesstimate is of course theoretical -. I am not privy to inside details of how MI5 split their funding. But to take some other. examples, the cost of a US counter-surveillance specialist. per day is USD 5,000. Even if the agents permanently assigned to me are. not of this calibre - even if they employ specialists when difficult. work planting bugs etc is encountered - their salary and. support costs must still be very. high. The individual agents are doing well for themselves as they are well-paid to. exercise psychopathic instincts which in any sane society would see them in prison; but the taxpayers who must fund. this terribly wasteful exercise are being "done" out. of hundreds of thousands of pounds each. year. It must be emphasised that the. above estimates are highly conservative. Besides the surveillance operation, it. must carry a high cost in man-hours to. propagate covert slanders through the population; to setup. and maintain the "interactive watching" links to TV and radio stations, which. these organisations continue desparately to "lie and deny"; and to induce antipathy in co-workers which would. not otherwise exist. Why they are wasting Millions of Pounds on a "Nobody from South. London" As remarked in the prologue to. this article, it is really most extraordinary that. the Security Service spends a chunk of its budget, every year for. nine years so far, on a meaningless campaign against a "nobody from South London". That they are spending. such a large amount of money has been confirmed. to me on several occasions, usually by oblique references to. "its costing this country millions". The supposed "logic". behind the persecution is that MI5 wish to avoid their harassment of me, and the involvement of the UK media, to be made public;. yet as the reader will appreciate that is a circular. argument, "theyre doing it because they want to keep it secret and avoid. humiliation for themselves and their country" begs the question, "why did. they start doing it in the first place?", to which. in truth I myself do not know the answer. Plainly MI5 with its rich budget can afford half a million pounds a. year to waste on a "nobody from South London". Some time ago I was talking to. a British surveillance professional on Compuserve who. told me "this work costs a lot of money and is usally. because the person I am following has done something (usually criminal) to warrant all this. money and time being spent." Yet in this particular case it. is plainly not the "victims fault" that the harassment is taking place. The hate-campaign. against me is completely the. creation of the obsessive psychologies of the MI5 agents who have. made themselves my persecutors; it is obviously a "personal" campaign. for them, and for years they misuse taxpayer funding to. feed their insane, unnatural and fixated fantasies. 2468 Tag: Domain User get another profile Tag: 233874
  - 20
    - M'I-5'Persecuti on ' Comparin g th e M I5 Persec ution w ith Germ an Fi nal Solu tion MI5 Persecution Update:. Friday 16 April, 1999 If You Intend To Reply,. Please Read This Please.... keep your response to one page!. Faxes over a page or two. will be deleted without being. read. BBC newscaster Nicholas Witchell. cant stop himself laughing During 1990-91 there were very many. instances of "interactive television" where newscasters. and other TV presenters saw on a screen before them what was happening in my home, and. reacted, frequently by laughing. at me. During this period I unfortunately did not record these programmes. For the last year or. two, I have been recording everything I watch, and there. has been a drastic decrease in such incidents. However, on occasion, television presenters do still engage. in "interactive watching" and react to what. they see. This has been evident with. Jon Snow of Channel Four News recently - a particularly interesting case, since it has been established that he cannot be corrupted. by money (it. is well-documented that MI5 offered him a tax-free salary and he turned them down). I wonder what device MI5. are using to encourage him to do. the "interactive watching"? On Saturday 10. April 1999 at 7pm, Nicholas Witchell on BBC2 News reacted when he saw that I was watching the programme,. and I have his reactions stored. safely on videotape. I have watched this tape several times and I am entirely confident that my. evaluation of his reactions is correct. For several minutes. his upper lip quivered in mirth as he attempted to keep a straight face. Then finally. his self-control evaporated through the excuse of a weak joke and. his face collapsed into a grin. The strange thing is that I dont know why he was laughing at me, what. I had done recently to "deserve" to. be laughed at. The MI5 persecutors usually manage. to invent some justification as to why people should laugh at and/or abuse me ("hes an X", "it was so funny" etc), so. Mr Witchell could have been laughing for any number of reasons. Perhaps. he found the views I have been expressing in these articles amusing? I suppose. if youre paid enough money and ordered to laugh then. even the most innocuous thing becomes. funny. Jon Snow of Channel Four News cant stop. himself smirking, either. On 12 February. 1999 I was watching Channel Four News presented by Jon Snow. As usual, I was recording the. programme, so that if anything out of the ordinary happened, Id be able to go back. and watch it again. Now, Jon Snow, by his own. claim, is uncorruptible. He says he turned down an. offer of a substantial tax-free salary from MI5 - they wanted to make him their. mouthpiece, and he told them where to get off. So you will be most surprised to learn that. Jon Snow "interactively watched" me that. evening, and on many other evenings. Approximately fifteen. minutes into the programme, he announced that the US President would be making. a live appearance at about 7.30pm; I looked at the clock on. the mantelpiece; and Snow saw me looking at the clock, and visibly tried to. suppress a smirk. Uncorruptible, are you, Mister Snow? If not money, then why. are you watching me, Mister Snow? Are. they forcing you to watch me? Cant you turn the. monitor off, Mister Snow? Keith Hill MP (Labour. - Streatham), my elected representative, as ever refuses. to help. Comparing. the MI5 Persecution with German "Final Solution" It might seem offensive. to compare the mass murder of millions of civilians in wartime with the peacetime persecution of. merely one person. Yet. the comparison has been coursing through my mind for several years now, because the brutality of German intent to. "sub-humans" is very much. comparable to the brutality of British intent to someone they vituperate and term "not up to British standards".. The methods may differ, but the persecutors mindset is. the same. The Germans first targeted the mentally disabled,. too During WW2 millions of ethnic Russians, Poles, Jews, mentally. ill, gypsies and other minorities were rounded up and murdered in purpose-built. camps by the German regime, in the name. of "racial superiority". Fifty years on, the British Secret Police, MI5, instituted a campaign of. mass hysteria;. but in their cowardice, limited their activities to one single victim. It is instructive to. note that the early German "cleansing" effort was directed primarily not at Jews, but. at the mentally ill. The Nazis set up the T4 project in the thirties. to "cleanse" away 70,000 mentally disabled people,. including schizophrenics and epileptics. After WW2 the Jews with their. media influence used the reaction from the holocaust to roll back anti-semitism in the Western. countries; however, the mentally ill are today still a persecuted. group in the modern Western world as they were under. the Nazis (the current Jewish home secretary in the UK intends to bring in laws for. incarceration without any criminal charge for some mentally ill people - he protects his own minority, but does. nothing for the other minorities in todays society), and this continuing bias forms. a central cause for the current. acts of persecution in the UK. Widespread knowledge of what is happening. to the "un-British" minority In both the German persecution of the thirties and early forties,. and the current British persecution, many, many people are well. aware of whats happening. There is. widespread complicity through inaction of populace; and in a substantial proportion. of the mainstread population, the persecution had/has widespread enthusiastic support; yet. in both the German case in the 1940s and the British today,. the existence of persecution is a. mass secret which must be never admitted out loud. In the recent Lawrence case this "secret bigotry". has been termed "institutionalised racism", and that is a very good word. for what the British are doing today The persecutory. attitudes and omerta regarding them are so deeply ingrained in the national psyche. that they define the national. mood During WW2 many Germans knew minorities were disappearing, and. through inaction quietly. condoned their government's mass murder of "un-German" minorities and inferior "foreigners";. and in the 1990s, similarly, many English people know what the MI5 British Secret. Police have been doing, and not only condone it, but actively take. part, because of. xenophobia against the "un-British" unit minority that is the target of "British" actions. This attitude by the British. persecutors has been made explicit through the. words "he's not up to British standards"; the British seem to have found their very own "untermenschen" to. victimise. Why these obsessive. "holy wars" happen This. type of aggression occurs when the majority is threatened or humiliated in some way, economically, militarily or. culturally. In pre-WW2 Germany the threat. was primarily economic and military, following Germany's humiliating defeat in the first. world war and the reparations it was. forced to pay. In modern Britain, one might guess that the majority English who are behind the persecution feel pressured. by the swiftly diminishing status of Britain in. the world, and the rapidly increasing coloured colonisation of their country, which in time. will see the ethnic English a minority in their own land,. and their more antisocial elements, unable to reply to the obvious. threat, instead project their aggression onto another, weaker,. unit minority In both cases there. is a whiff of "holy war" or irrational obsession with the persecution.. Certainly the German behaviour fifty years ago bordered on the. not-quite-sane, and the current British behaviour towards their chosen victim is strongly tinged with. a leave-taking of reason. And the choices open to the. victims are the same, since MI5 will never allow me to escape them, "if he tries to run away we'll. find him", just like the commandant of Auschwitz telling the new arrivals, "the. only escape is through. the chimney". The Victim Will Destroy Us if We Dont. Destroy Him First The persecutors propaganda is the same. Fifty. years ago the Germans said, "if we don't do it. to the Jews then the Jews will do it to us"; and MI5's propaganda in the. early nineties concentrated on their victim as a "monster" aesome. "untermenschen" minority. "We. are decent fellows" say the Brutal Persecutors During the course of researching this. article I read part of the very interesting book, "Hitler - A Study. in Tyranny", by Alan Bullock. This volume contains a quote. from Himmler on the "Final Solution"; "Most of you know what it means when a hundred corpses. are lying side by side, or five hundred or one thousand. To have stuck it out,. and at the same time .... to have remained decent fellows, that is what has. made us hard. This is a page of. glory in our history which has never been written and is. never to be written." In the MI5 persecution, too, there. is a thread of deliberate brutality to the sick and. vulnerable, while the persecutors maintain that "we are decent. fellows". There is almost a conscious schizophrenia in the self-attitudes of the Security Service operatives and those in. the public who they employ against me, which. reflects the contradiction evident in the German attitude above. On. the one hand, they stoop to the lowest and most base behaviour; yet at. the same time, the MI5 operatives tell themselves that since. they are civilised British people, then surely they must by definition be "decent fellows".. Any indecency is made the fault of the victim; "hes. making us persecute him, so we need feel no guilt". Yet the conduct is. atypical of the way these peoples see their normal modes of behaviour. Befslaughter was. not typical of normal German behaviour up. to that point. Similarly, the current MI5 abuse goes against the grain of British self-image. as being "reserved" and "decent", since they are using terms. of abuse which are common among blacks and other supposedly less-developed races, but. not among the English. Conclusion The ultimate aim of both persecutions. is the humiliation and physical extinction of the persecuted group. The Germans did this in a. very direct way; the British Secret Police MI5 are acting. indirectly and relying on self-extinction of their target, because. in peacetime and in the current somewhat false climate. of "political correctness" more direct methods are impossible. If MI5 undertook more direct action. the mass "omerta" would be broken. I have written this. article with sincerity to show how a historically recent persecution in another country parallels. what is being done in this country today. In both. cases, the evil-doers are of their countries establishments, and rely on widespread tacit support. to maintain the persecution and. omerta around it. While the holocaust was undoubtedly the greater evil, it is important. to be aware of the fact that had the Germans not been defeated fifty years ago, their plans would have. gone through to total. completion. In Britain today no force threatens the "permanent government" of which the Security Service forms a part; and it looks. very unlikely that the wrongs perpetrated. by the MI5 secret police will ever be revealed to. public view, and the British secret state brought to justice for its evil. actions. 998 Tag: Domain User get another profile Tag: 233873
  - 21
    - IPX routing in Windows 2000 Professional Greetings: How may I enable or install IPX routing in Win2k Pro? I have a Win98 guest running in a 'virtualbox' vm which has IP and IPX (and a Novell 32-bit client) configured. The host sees two NICs: its ethernet hardware NIC and the virtualbox 'Host Network Interface (TAP)' virtual NIC; I have IP routing working (a registry change enabled it) between these interfaces and consequently Microsoft SMB networking is working on the Win98 guest. The Win2k Pro host has NWLink configured and also has a Novell client installed and is logged in to a NW3.12 (bindery) server. I need to route RIP and SAP for IPX between the two interfaces (host physical and guest virtual) -- as is already working for IP to permit the Win98 guest to login and use Netware services. I have Win2k Server and NT3.51 and NT4.0 Server in case some code is needed to be installed on the Win2k Pro host for this purpose (from RRAS?). All replies appreciated. Michael Tag: Domain User get another profile Tag: 233872
  - 22
    - two nic cards in server. 1 cisco router via leased line modem. Right now I have the router setup with DHCP and connected to the switch. All workstation can access the internet this way. Would the better setup be to connect directly into the 1st NIC of the server and have the 2nd NIC cable going into the switch? Is ISA required if this was the case? Tag: Domain User get another profile Tag: 233871
  - 23
    - Ports opened in router show up as closed with external port scan I am currently trying to setup VPN on a 2000 server using Microsoft VPN using L2TP with shared key authorization through a Linksys router connected to a DSL modem. Been running into connection error 789. In the router I have enabled Port Forwarding of port 1701, 500 and 1723 using both UDP and TCP on the router. When I run a port scan only port 1723 comes back as opened. The others claim to be closed. Any reason why this would be occuring. They are clearly opened in the router settings. Thanks in advance, Adam Tag: Domain User get another profile Tag: 233869
  - 24
    - Win 2K "Forgets" Networked Drive Mapping Why does Windows keep "forgetting" it's mapped drives? I'm wondering if it's something I'm doing, or something being done by some software I'm running. Or could it just be that Win 2K is, like me, getting old and becoming forgetful? ;o) I have just two computers, a desktop and a laptop, connected via a peer-to-peer network. The desktop is a Micron brand and the laptop is a Sony VAIO brand. I've chosen the drive letters "M" and "V," respectively, to represent the C: drives of the Micron and VAIO c