nick
Sun Dec 02 13:48:59 PST 2007
On Nov 28, 3:01 pm, "Phillip Windell" <philwind...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> I use the full range in both scopes and then use Exclusions to control what
> is given out.
>
> --
> Phillip Windellwww.wandtv.com
>
> The views expressed, are my own and not those of my employer, or Microsoft,
> or anyone else associated with me, including my cats.
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
> "nick" <cipher7...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:3889e930-a0fd-45c9-8e0a-ca4a236f5837@g30g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
> >I have a Windows 2003 network with about 50 client stations. I have
> > two servers running DHCP:
>
> > server01 has a scope of 192.168.2.10-x.x.x.60
> > server02 has a scope of 192.168.2.61-x.x.x.115
>
> > I do very little on the network as far as adding new stations,
> > installing NICs, etc.
>
> > My question: Is this a good way to setup DHCP redundancy or am I
> > missing something?- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Full range and then use exclusions? Can their be conflicts between the
two? Are the lease expirations different?