crashed DC1 server

Tutorials Win: Microsoft Windows Forum

- Previous
  - 1
    - Domain Administrator Lockout Hi, I see in system even log SAM database error messages saying that Account Can't be locked, due to resource error Event ID:12294, and that account is domain\administrator That means something or someone is trying to logon to domain as administrator but failing. (also can't lock the account, because I disabled). How I find from what IP or workstation these attempt being made? Event log doesn't mention Thanks MC Tag: crashed DC1 server Tag: 176451
  - 2
    - Group nesting troubles Hi folks, I'm having a bit a problem with some group nesting issues and I hope some of you might be able to point out the errors of me ways. Please see the problem below: A user cannot access a folder on a file server. This folder has NTFS modify access permission set for "Group C". The user is a member of "Group A" which is nested in "Group B" which is in turn nested in "Group C". Folder Resource -> Group C -> Group B -> Group A -> User Native mode 2003 domain Group A (Universal Distribution) Group B (Universal Security Group) Group C (Universal Security Group) If the user is added directly to the folder resource he can access the folder so I am wondering if this a nesting issue (access token limitation) or an issue with Security/Distribution? Very much appreciate any help or pointers. Thank you. Tag: crashed DC1 server Tag: 176449
  - 3
    - retiring the 1st DC in the domain I am running a 2000 domain, all servers run Win2k /SP4. I would like to retire the 1st domain server and use the server at a small remote site which is not part of the domain. As I write this, this machine currently runs all 5 FSMO roles. My qustion is, how shoudl I transfer these? Are there any problems even if the transfer is succesful? Any suggestion in general? Regards, Tag: crashed DC1 server Tag: 176445
  - 4
    - domain users can not change printer page layout hi, i am using widows 2003 server as domain controller i want that the users should not change the page layout of the printer when they send a page for printing. i want that all the users should print the page only in A4 type. i want to restrict users to print only A4 page format print. can any body help me. thanks. Tag: crashed DC1 server Tag: 176440
  - 5
    - Using old machine to upgrade from NT to 2k then move FSMOs all to I have to upgrade the network at my school. I have been having problems with tests of CDs to upgrade with my HP Poliant servers. I am wondering if i can use one of my workstations (at least 1.8GHz CPUs) to install NT on as a BDC then upgrade to PDC...then upgrade to 2k. I know this isn't great since the machine is older. Could I do this just to upgrade the database to A.D. then run DCPROMO on my 2k member servers and then transfer all the FSMO roles off the old workstation. Thanks for any advise. Tag: crashed DC1 server Tag: 176438
  - 6
    - naming information cannot be located because Hello to all Pro Naming Information cannot be located because: the specified domain either does not exist or could not be contacted. Scenario: Problem with Windows 2000 Advanced Server failed to boot up, then force it to boot i use F8 then goto Last good known configuration and it boot up. But the Problem is when I click on "Active Directory Users and Computers" it displays "Naming Information cannot be..." error but when i click on "Connect to Domain Controller..." and put the server.domain_name.local it can connect to domain. Another problem occur when i want to share my folder for example then add permission to it will display the "Object Picker cannot open because no locations from which objects could be found." therefore i cannot open the Active Directory Users. Pls. help God bless Tag: crashed DC1 server Tag: 176436
  - 7
    - Deleted Accounts(E-mail Exchange) HELP!!! We are currently sitting in a Mixed Mode Environment. Between a WinNT Domain and Win2K Active Directory. We have Multiple WinNT Domain. In Active Directory Management, under Users I noticed there was alot of User Accounts that all had a -1 after them. So I highlighted all these accounts and deleted them. When I did this, it apparently wiped out all the e-mail accounts on the other NT Domains out there. Somehow, these accounts with the -1 were associated to e-mail accounts on the other NT Domains. Can anyone explain why? And since this account is deleted, it looks like the e-mail account is deleted as well. Is the e-mail account gone as well, or is there a way to restore it?? Any help would be appreicated. Tag: crashed DC1 server Tag: 176424
  - 8
    - testing authoritative restore of objects in a windows 2003 SP2 domain Hi guys, I need to test the authoritative restore of a couple of objects in a 2k3 SP2 domain. I have two questions: If I have 3 servers: server1: All FSMO roles (GC too) server2: GC server3: GC Is it ok to perform the authoritative restore on server1 ? Is it ok to just shutdown the other two domain controllers while doing the restore procedure and turn them on once the restore is completed ? Will they automatically replicate with the primary domain controller and get the new (or old,,,depending on how you see it ;-)) objects according to standard AD replications ? Also, does the restore procedure restores exchange attributes, in the event the restore also includes a mailbox enabled user ? Thank you so much in advance for your answer. Have a nice day, zz Tag: crashed DC1 server Tag: 176414
  - 9
    - Unable to login from Pre Windows 2000 PCs I have a Domain for which I have created one additional DC. I still have some win9x PCs which login to this domain for resource utilization. All of a sudden they started to get "The username Or Passwword you have typed is incorrect or logon to domain is denied" error. Where as I tried login with the same user and password from WinXPP pcs there they were successfull. I installed ADSClient also but for no avail. ADC is running web services also. Then I tried restarting the ADC then only the Win9x PC were able to login. Can anybody throw some light on why this happened. Cheers, Sudhi... Tag: crashed DC1 server Tag: 176410
  - 10
    - Remote Reboot Registry Keys I am looking for the Rebote Reboot Registry keys but am having no luck in locating them. I need these because I have added Guest and Interactive to the users list and need to copy this to all my other stations remotely. Any one with a suggestion is greatly appreciated. Thanks James Tag: crashed DC1 server Tag: 176409
  - 11
    - problem in xp One day i insert a chip(monthly) cd and i got some alerts through kaspersky anti virus that some exe files are executing then i quarantine .. From that time onwords my account hass been logged off and asking for password eventhough i dont have password,.. i entered ok with out any password then logged in and logged off... even if i got this problem with adminstrtor as user name .. anybody helpme please!!!! Tag: crashed DC1 server Tag: 176408
  - 12
    - login Scripts not running I have an OU that caintain another OU beneath it. The aprent OU is called WSUS and the lowere OU is called W2K. W2K contains all W2K workstations and WSUS contains the WinXP workstations. I have an GPO on each. WSUS contains the settings for Windows update as well as a login script to enable automatic updates and start the service becuase the services are stoped and disabled. W2K runs a login script to correct DSRT issues. Both login scripts are computer policies. The strange thing is everythingr uns fine on the XP cleints. For the W2K clients who are not at the main site where the script is located in the netlogon directory on the main DC it appears the script is not running. Shouldn't the GPO flow down to the W2K direcotry. Is there any reason why the script to start automatic updates wouldn't apply to cleints at a different site. Any help would be most appreciated. Tag: crashed DC1 server Tag: 176389
  - 13
    - Configure NTP server/clients with no internet connections All, I have a newtwork with several w2k servers and winXp clients. I have no internet connection. I have recently been having time issues on my network. Time is not syncn'ing up with my NTP time server anymore.. And i think i messed it up.. I want to have ServerA host my NTP time source using the CMOS battery on the server, and all the XP clients point to ServerA for their NTP time provider. How do i configure this properly? Is there a GOOD KB article on how to setup disconnected (no internet) networks with a proper NTP time source? TIA Drum on .. .. . . . Tag: crashed DC1 server Tag: 176388
  - 14
    - Set UNIX Attributes by Command line Hello there'a way or a script (by command line) to set UNIX Attributes (nis Domain, uid, ecc.) in active dictory? Tanks to all Tag: crashed DC1 server Tag: 176387
  - 15
    - AD User & Inherited Permissions I have a Domain Admin User object that is behaving strangely. It is located in the root of the domain object. When I go into the security tab and then select the advanced button, I notice the the inherited permission check box is not selected. So I selected it and clicked Apply and OK. A Couple hours latter the box is unchecked. I then manually checked the box on all of our DC's within about 2 minutes time. Within an hour or two the box was unchecked again. I need this Domain Admin to receive the Inherited permissions. Where do I go from here? Jim Tag: crashed DC1 server Tag: 176382
  - 16
    - Rename Domain Controller DC Hi Pros, I been trying to rename the current DC, from WORLDGROUPC to WORLDGROUPC by using Netdom. WORLDGROUP is the old DC with Windows NT 4.0 and WORLDGROUPC is Windows server 2003 we are going to replace the Old server to the new one, therefore, we need to change the NEW server(WORLDGROUPC) to the name of the OLD server(WORLDGROUP). the thing is, I have disconnected the NEW DC from the network when i tried rename it, so that it won't crashes with the OLD DC (which is still running) in the network. so, now the DC (WORLDGROUPC) is standalone, doesn't connect to any network, and i want to change the DC name to WORLDGROUP but in the command Prompt: >netdom computername WORLDGROUPC /add WORLDGROUP When i enter this, it prompt up error: RPC Server is unavailable. please help me to solve this problem, thanks in advance -- Message posted via WinServerKB.com http://www.winserverkb.com/Uwe/Forums.aspx/windows-2000-active-directory/200801/1 Tag: crashed DC1 server Tag: 176380
  - 17
    - Active directory replication schedule Hello, can someone explane to me what the differents are between replication schedules? I mean when i open sites and services I see one schedule on the NTDS settings of the site (NTDS site setting), drill down on that site i see a schedule on the replication partner server settings, and I can see a schedule on the site links. I cant exacly tell what the different is can anybody tell me? Thanks, Eric Tag: crashed DC1 server Tag: 176369
  - 18
    - Grant ntfs permission on domain computer to WORKGROUPComp\User How can I grant ntfs permission on domain computer to WORKGROUPComp \User? 1. Computer CompA is a member of Domain DomA 2. Computer CompB is standalone workgroup machine 3. There is TCP/IP connection, routing and DNS resolution between CompA and CompB 4. I need to grant the CompA\SomeUser the permission on some folder of CompB What is the correct method to perform this? Thanks in advance, Dmitry Tag: crashed DC1 server Tag: 176368
  - 19
    - Practice Test Search Engine, It will be your best web site | http://exams.googletoad.com http://exams.googletoad.com Just write your exam number or general phrase (70-227,642-642,cisco,oracle,microsoft,hp,juniper etc.) and hit the search button. Choose your dump (actualtests,pass4sure) , click detail page and click download button. If you have any request just fill the form on the site.. Enjoy.. Tag: crashed DC1 server Tag: 176367
  - 20
    - IWAM and IUSR Accounts I'm fairly clueless as to why these accounts are needed. I see the explanation in the account properties, but my question is, does every server in the domain need to have one of these user accounts? Tag: crashed DC1 server Tag: 176364
  - 21
    - Delegatoin w/ Protocol transition in a Windows 2000 native domain Hi, Some background information first. I have a root domain "rootdom.com" and two child domains "c1.rootdom.com" and "c2.rootdom.com". In the c1 domain I have an IIS 6 with an ASP.net application on it that's running forms-based authentication as well as an Exchange 2003 frontend server running integrated authentication (integrated authentication is the only box checked). The ASP.NET application needs delegated access to the exchange frontend-server by means impersonating the user who's logged in with forms authentication and querying webdav with the user's credentials. What I've done so far: 1. Created a domain user in the "rootdom.com"-domain called "DelegationUser". This account is trusted for delegation. I don't have the "Delegation" tab you get in a 2003-native domain since I'm running 2000-native on all domains. 2. Created service principal names for the "DelegationUser" user the service principal names are: "aspnetserver" and "aspnetserver.c1.rootdom.com" 3. Assigned "DelegationUser" to the ApplicationPool that's running the ASP.NET application which included adding delegationuser to the IIS_WPG group and granting the user the "Act as part of the operating system" privelege on the ASP.NET server. 4. Turned off impersonation on the ASP.NET application 5. Used programmatic impersonation in the ASP.NET application where I create a "new WindowsIdentity(UPN_OF_USER_I_WANT_TO_IMPERSONATE).Impersonate()" 6. While impersonating I query the Exchange 2003-frontend server with webdav. 7. End impersonation and revert to the application pool user which runs the ASP.NEt application Step 6 fails with a 401-error code while steps 1-5 seem to work just fine. I've even checked the identity of the current thread while impersonating, and I can see that it is in fact the user that I'm impersonating. However, the identity is not being delegated to the exchange 2003 server. Things I've tried my self: 1. Trusting the computer accounts for the ASP.NET server and the Exchange 2003 frontend server for delegation. However, this didn't make any difference. 2. Looking in the IIS log "C:\Windows\System32\LogFiles" on the Exchange 2003 server. Doing this I can see that the IIS is reading my webdav queries as anonymous requests. This leads me to believe that it's reverting to NTLM which isn't delegatable. 3. Looking in the event log of the c1.rootdom.com DC and I've seen no failure audits. I presume that this is the DC that should be issuing tickets for the aspnetserver? I know the above scenario works with constrained delegation, since I've done it in a 2003-native domain set up. But it SHOULD work in a 2000-native domain as well. Any help? Tag: crashed DC1 server Tag: 176359
  - 22
    - DC Demotion Checklist? Greetings, I know there are a ton of checklist for promoting a server to a domain controller, but how about in the other direction? We are carrying out a hardware replacement and need to demote the DC's that are being retired. Are there steps I need to take care of or people I need to notify prior to doing so? Are there any steps I should take other than just running DCpromo and being done with it? Any suggestions appreciated. Tag: crashed DC1 server Tag: 176354
  - 23
    - What Is A Domain Name And Where To Register? A domain name is an alias for an IP address. Now what is an IP address? An IP address is a numeric code that signifies where to look through the Internet for content. An example of an IP address would be 22.226.141.25. Rather than typing in a long and easily forgotten IP address, a domain name helps you by typing an easily remembered name to access the same site. For example, www.domainsatretail.com is a domain name that points to a specific IP address. People can remember a domain name such as www.domainsatretail.com much easier than they can a long numeric code. Domain names are everywhere as many use it everyday. Think of search sites. Google and Yahoo both have corresponding domain names www.google.com and www.yahoo.com. If you have ever sent an email you have used a domain name. For example when http://www.dontplayplay.com/html/Internet/20060929/31898.html Tag: crashed DC1 server Tag: 176352
  - 24
    - What Is A Domain Name And Where To Register? A domain name is an alias for an IP address. Now what is an IP address? An IP address is a numeric code that signifies where to look through the Internet for content. An example of an IP address would be 22.226.141.25. Rather than typing in a long and easily forgotten IP address, a domain name helps you by typing an easily remembered name to access the same site. For example, www.domainsatretail.com is a domain name that points to a specific IP address. People can remember a domain name such as www.domainsatretail.com much easier than they can a long numeric code. Domain names are everywhere as many use it everyday. Think of search sites. Google and Yahoo both have corresponding domain names www.google.com and www.yahoo.com. If you have ever sent an email you have used a domain name. For example when http://www.dontplayplay.com/html/Internet/20060929/31898.html Tag: crashed DC1 server Tag: 176351
  - 25
    - Disable network bridge by GPO Hi, My company has a Windows 2000 network with XP and 2000 workstations. We are trying to disable Network Bridge by using GPO, so we took an XP system template and add it to the Administrative templates on a Windows 2000 DC and enabled "Prohibit installation and configuration of Network Bridge on your DNS domain network" from "Local Computer Policy, Computer Configuration, Administrative Templates, Network, and Network Connections." It works if there is no network bridge on the XP workstation, but if there is already a bridge setup, the GPO cannot be applied to it. Any suggestions? Thanks. William Tag: crashed DC1 server Tag: 176349
- Next
  - 1
    - kostenloser werbefreier webspace mit domain kostenloser werbefreier webspace mit domain http://www.xd03.com/webspace/ http://www.xd03.com/webspace/ http://www.xd03.com/webspace/ http://www.xd03.com/webspace/ kostenloser werbefreier webspace mit domain frei webspace werbefrei mit domain host webspace werbefrei mit domain bilder webspace werbefrei mit domain kostenlos webspace werbefrei mit domain php 2gb webspace werbefrei mit domain webspace werbefrei mit domain test kostenlose webspace werbefrei mit domain homepage webspace werbefrei mit domain webspace werbefrei mit domain mieten kostenlosen webspace werbefrei mit domain kostenlos webspace werbefrei mit domain webspace werbefrei mit domain angebot domain und webspace werbefrei mit domain domain webspace werbefrei mit domain shop webspace werbefrei mit domain funpic webspace werbefrei mit domain kostenlos werbefrei webspace werbefrei mit domain webspace werbefrei mit domain frontpage bilder webspace werbefrei mit domain webspace werbefrei mit domain guenstig webspace werbefrei mit domain schweiz unlimited webspace werbefrei mit domain webspace werbefrei mit domain vergleich 100 mb webspace werbefrei mit domain gratis webspace werbefrei mit domain mit php webhosting webspace werbefrei mit domain kostenfrei webspace werbefrei mit domain typo3 webspace werbefrei mit domain ftp webspace werbefrei mit domain kostenlos reseller webspace werbefrei mit domain kostenlos php webspace werbefrei mit domain freier webspace werbefrei mit domain webspace werbefrei mit domain anbieter php webspace werbefrei mit domain gratis domains webspace werbefrei mit domain web hosting unlimited domains gmx webspace werbefrei mit domain webspace werbefrei mit domain angebote 100mb webspace werbefrei mit domain domain mit webspace werbefrei mit domain webspace werbefrei mit domain kostenfreier webspace werbefrei mit domain confixx webspace werbefrei mit domain gratis webspace werbefrei mit domain ftp cgi webspace werbefrei mit domain werbefreier webspace werbefrei mit domain billig webspace werbefrei mit domain asp webspace werbefrei mit domain webspace werbefrei mit domain hosting provider webspace werbefrei mit domain domain webspace werbefrei mit domain kostenlos kostenloser webspace werbefrei mit domain webspace werbefrei mit domain werbefrei cheap webspace werbefrei mit domain blog webspace werbefrei mit domain gratis webspace werbefrei mit domain webspace werbefrei mit de domain webspace werbefrei mit com domain webspace werbefrei mit net domain webspace werbefrei mit org domain webspace werbefrei mit info domain webspace werbefrei mit biz domain webspace werbefrei mit gr domain webspace werbefrei mit ag domain webspace werbefrei mit nl domain webspace werbefrei mit us domain webspace werbefrei mit la domain webspace werbefrei mit eu domain webspace werbefrei mit be domain webspace werbefrei mit at domain webspace werbefrei mit ch domain webspace werbefrei mit mx domain webspace werbefrei mit br domain webspace werbefrei mit pl domain webspace werbefrei mit ru domain webspace werbefrei mit jp domain webspace werbefrei mit mobi domain webspace werbefrei mit pr domain de domains guenstig bestellen und registrieren com domains guenstig bestellen und registrieren net domains guenstig bestellen und registrieren org domains guenstig bestellen und registrieren info domains guenstig bestellen und registrieren biz domains guenstig bestellen und registrieren gr domains guenstig bestellen und registrieren ag domains guenstig bestellen und registrieren nl domains guenstig bestellen und registrieren us domains guenstig bestellen und registrieren la domains guenstig bestellen und registrieren eu domains guenstig bestellen und registrieren be domains guenstig bestellen und registrieren at domains guenstig bestellen und registrieren ch domains guenstig bestellen und registrieren mx domains guenstig bestellen und registrieren br domains guenstig bestellen und registrieren pl domains guenstig bestellen und registrieren ru domains guenstig bestellen und registrieren pr domains guenstig bestellen und registrieren mobi domains guenstig bestellen und registrieren reseller domains bestellen order and register greek domains cheap web hosting and domain provider cheap san francisco web hosting and domain service web hosting and domain reseller cheap hosting and domainservice cheap web hosting and domain reseller service webhosting and domain reseller service cheap hosting and domain service hosting web hosting domain internet domain service cheap transfer domains dns hosting dns domain dedicated hosting with cheap domain internet webhosting with cheap domain domains host webhosting free web hosting offer domain offer hosting agreements domain agreements php web hosting with cheap domain hosted domains webhosting domain cheap web host domain register cheap globat hosting domain register resell domains webspace reseller affordable web hosting web hosting providers domain providers register domains order webspace high quality web hosting and domain service traffic flat domain register webhosting web hosting domain service register cheap domains php hosting domain service php register cheap domains asp hosting domain service asp register cheap domains webhosting webdesign domain service cheap buy cheap domains webhosting email provider domain provider webhosting provider webspace server hosting server housing domain register ftp webhosting ftp webspace domain service register cheap internet domains dna domain internet webspace buy cheap domain hosting cheap webspace hosting buy cheap domains order cheap webspace with domain fast web hosting cheap domains for sale domains for sale cheap webhosting with cheap domain linux domain hosting linux webhosting free web hosting domain service register cheap domains Tag: crashed DC1 server Tag: 176346
  - 2
    - Best Free People Search I came across this site that looks pretty amazing. You can conduct your own people searches and best of all it's free to sign up. http://www.bestfreepeoplesearches.info Tag: crashed DC1 server Tag: 176345
  - 3
    - Prevent some Domain Admin Account from creating USERS, Groups, OUs How Can I PREVENT some specific Domain Admin Accounts from creating User Account, Security Groups, OUs and modifying those object properties?? These Domain Admin Account handle administrative tasks over Domain Controllers Servers such as: Install/Uninstall Software, Add Server Roles, Promote New Domain Controller, Configure AD Replication, DNS Configuration, DHCP Configuration, Manage Event Viewer, TroubleShooting related Tasks, Restart Services,etc... As far as I know the only way they can do all those things in a domain Controller Server is making those Users Account Domain Admins.... Im almost sure that the "Delegate Control" Concept doesnt work in this case, please correct me if Im wrong.... I Tried Restrict loading of Active Directory Users & Computers snap- in into MMC.... but the users already know how to manage Users or Groups using Command - Line Tools or Scripts.... I Tried removing those Account from Domain Admins Group.... I created a group where I place all of those user accounts, then I placed these group as member of other Built In Security Group Such as: DHCP Administrators, DNS Administrators, Server Operators, Network Configuration Operators, etc.... I Also gave most of the Privileges that Domain Admin Group Has... and yes.. I prevented these users from managing Users, Groups or OUs.. but that also I prevented these users from Installing/Uninstalling software, Restarting Services, Adding Roles, they couldnt handle AD Replication, etc.... So at the end it didnt work the way I wanted.... And finally I tried to place these accounts in two Security Groups: Domain Admins and a group called "LEVEL1". Using ADUC Permissions TAB, I configure "LEVEL1" group with DENY permisiions over USER, GROUP an OUs Objects... hoping that "the most restrictive permission would apply"... but sadly... it didnt work neither.... So I really hope you can guide how to achieve this goal. Tag: crashed DC1 server Tag: 176343
  - 4
    - M.I 5-Perse cution . my re sponse to the harassme nt -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- -=. my response to the harassment -= -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- My first reaction in 1990/91 was to assume that if I. broke contact then they would not be able to follow. and would lose interest. So I did the things that have been suggested. by other people; I sold my television, stopped. listening to the radio and tried to withdraw away from the sources of abuse as much as possible. I. reasoned that they must have more important things to deal with and that normal people. would simply leave me alone if it were made. difficult for them to continue their harassment. I reckoned without the sheer. vindictiveness of the abusers. They did not let up but instead "got to" people around me, mainly. people at work, to do their dirty work for them. I went to see my. GP, who refused to believe what he was being told, and. refused to direct me on to anyone who could be of practical assistance. It was not until three years had. passed that the GP admitted the matter was outside his competence and. suggested going to the police. In the summer of. 1994 we called in counter-surveillance experts from a private detective. agency to sweep our house and telephone for bugging devices. They conducted a thorough search and found nothing; but. as noted above, since the existence of surveillance was being forced in. my face by the harassers, you. would expect them to have taken the possibility of a counter-surveillance sweep into account when planning the type. of devices to. be employed. In Easter. 1995 I made a complaint to my local Police station in London, but the police have not expressed any intention to do. anything about the continuing harassment ("we're not saying. it's happening and we're not saying. it isn't happening" were the words used). I think the officer I spoke to at Easter wasn't aware of it happening, although. other members of the police force obviously. do know. From April 1995 until the present time the matter has. been discussed in a lot of detail on the. Usenet (Internet) "uk.misc" newsgroup. That discussion has given birth to the article which. you are now reading. My hopes in posting to Usenet. were that wider publicizing would discourage the security services from continuing their harassment, and "draw. people out" into concurring with the truth of. what was being said. Neither of those have followed, but the discussion has served a purpose in allowing. this structured report to. be created. 9037 Tag: crashed DC1 server Tag: 176339
  - 5
    - M,I.5 Persecution ' purpose in publi cizing it; censorship in u k.* news groups -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= -= purpose in publicizing it;. censorship in uk.* newsgroups -= -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= The postings to uk.misc newsgroup generated a very defensive reaction. from Usenet. readers in the UK. So much so, that they tried strenuously to suppress what. was being said, both by breaking the rules of netiquette in their responses on the forum, and directly. by action to revoke the account from. which the postings were issued. Yet the postings. were within the normal boundaries of behaviour for uk.misc, and other less. partisan spectators did not see justice in the censorship which was. effected, as the following excerpt shows; :Karen Lofstrom. (lofstrom@lava.net) wrote :>It. does seem that the frequency and the size of his posts are :>approaching net abuse. However, IMHO, they aren't quite. there yet. If :>his postmaster. were to act in this instance, it would raise troubling :>censorship. issues. The inescapable conclusion of the censorship. effected on the uk.* newsgroups is that the British are intent on. their wrongdoing remaining concealed, and therefore seek to subvert and suppress freedom. of speech, not only in their own country where the media shows xenophobic bias. and bile against all perceived enemies. within and without, but also in other countries which have their own statutes to guarantee the. basic human right of. free speech. It is absolutely necessary to bring their hate campaign out into the. open where it can be placed under scrutiny and the. harassers seen for what they are. That is. the only way of making it impossible for the security services to carry it out. There is a wider dimension, though.. Xenophobia as demonstrated by British people. and institutions over the last few years belongs to the same stable. as racial hatred. In one case, two youths on a Tube train made that racism explicit by referring to their. victim as a "soft toy, not up to. British Standards". Doubtless others victimize partly on the basis of. race (isn?t it odd that they chose to torment someone who is. not ethnically English?) while expressing their abuse in terms of another genetic attribute, namely. mental illness. All xenophobia on a genetic basis is wrong,. but while racial insults are illegal, abusing the mentally ill is neither against the law. nor subject to similar condemnation when it. is exposed. 6607 Tag: crashed DC1 server Tag: 176337
  - 6
    - M'I-5,Pers ecution ' abu se in se t-up situati ons and in pub lic -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- -= abuse in set-up. situations and in public -= -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Strangers in the street have recognized me on sight. many times, and shown awareness of the current thread of abuse. To give. you one example, in 1992 I was seriously ill, and a manager. at work somewhat humorously said that "it wasn't fair" that people were bullying me. A. few days later, I attended for the first time a clinic in London as an outpatient, and. on my way out was accosted by. someone who asked if "they had paid my fare", with emphasis on the word "fare". He repeated the. word several times in this different context;. that they should have paid my "fare", each time emphasizing the word. For. two and a half years from the time their harassment started until November 1992 I refused to see. a psychiatrist, because I reasoned that I was not ill of my own action or fault,. but through the stress caused by harassment, and that a. lessening of the illness would have to be consequent to a removal of its immediate cause, in other. words a cessation of harassment. I also reasoned that since they were taunting. me with jokes about mental illness, if I were to seek treatment then the. abusers would think that they had "won" and. been proved "right". Remember, the constant theme of any persecution. is, "we must destroy you because you're X", whether X is a racial or other attribute. In this. case the X was "we persecute. you because you have brain disease". The similarity of this logic to Nazi attitudes to the mentally ill is. striking. The same manager. who'd said "it wasn't fair" asked me in winter 1992 why I didn't seek. help from a psychiatrist; was it, he asked, because "they would think they had won" if I sought treatment? That was something. I'd never said at work... again, taken separately it proves nothing,. but many such things. over a period of months proves conclusively that people in the company knew what was going on, and in quite a. lot of detail. Usually harassment in public lacks the level. of finesse of "paying your fare". Most people's imagination does not go beyond. moronic parroting of the current term of denigration. That is not surprising given. the average level of the abusers; if they. do not have the intelligence to distinguish wrong from right then neither will. they have the capacity for anything other than mindless repetition of a monosyllabic term. calculated to fit into. their minds. The first incidents of verbal assault in public were in again. in the summer of 1990, although they increased in frequency. and venom with time. In July 1990 the first public incident occurred on a. tube train on the Northern line. Two men and their girlfriends recognised me; the. women sprang to my defence, saying. "He looks perfectly normal, he doesn't look ill". Their boyfriends of course knew better, and followed the party line; one. of them made reference to an. "operation", apparently to work at the tube station but implicitly to a visit that I had made to hospital a couple. of weeks previously. In August 1990. going home from college, soon after getting on a tube train at Gloucester Road I was. followed by a group of four youths, who started a chant of abuse. That. they were targeting me was confirmed by other people in the carriage, one of whom asked the other. "who are they going on at, is it the bloke who just got on?" to which the second replied "yes, I. think so". I was tempted to reply, but as in every other instance the. abusers are enabled in their. cowardice by physically outnumbering the abused; any confrontation would result in my. being beaten up, followed by a complaint to the police that "he attacked us", and. of course he's ill, so he must have been imagining that we were. getting at him. Shitty, aren't they? But the. shittiness of the four youths on the tube train is as nothing compared. to the episode on the National Express coach to Dover in the summer of 1992. While going on holiday to the. Continent I was verbally set upon by a couple. travelling sitting a few rows behind. The boy did the talking, his. female companion contributing only a continuous empty giggling noise.. He spoke loudly to ensure other people on the coach heard, always about "they" and "this bloke" but never naming either the. abusers or the person he was talking about. He said. "they" had "found somebody from his school, and he was always really stressed at. school". They must have dug deep to find enemies there; perhaps someone. who dropped out of school, someone who didn't do too well later, who was jealous and keen to get. their own back? The. boy also said "he was in a bed and breakfast for only one night and. they got him". By a not unexpected coincidence I had been in a B&B in Oxford a week previously, which had been. booked from work; other things lead me to the conclusion that the company's offices. were bugged for most of the 2 1/2 years that I was there, so "they" would have known. a room in the B&B had been booked. (But. I'll bet "they" didn't tell the company's managers their offices were bugged,. did they?). After a few minutes of this I went. back to where they were sitting and asked where they were travelling. The boy named a village in. France, and the girl's giggling suddenly ceased; presumably. it permeated to her brain cell. what the purpose of the boy's abuse was. This and other set-up. situations are obviously calculated to provoke a direct confrontation which would bring. in the police, with the abusers claiming that they were the ones attacked. Again. in 1992, outside the house where I was. living in Oxford I was physically attacked by someone - not punched, just grabbed by the. coat, with some verbals thrown in for good measure. That was something the people at work shouldn't. have known about... but soon after a couple of people were talking right in. front of me. about, "I heard he was attacked". The UK police have a responsibility for preventing assault occurring, but they do not seem to. take any interest in. meeting that responsibility. I suppose their attitude is that harassment does not come within. their remit unless it involves physical assault, and they will only become involved. once that happens. That is of course quite the wrong attitude for them to take, but as I now understand, the. police investigate only the crime they wish to investigate; if they do. not take your complaints seriously then there is nothing you. can do to make them take. action. 4177 Tag: crashed DC1 server Tag: 176336
  - 7
    - M'I`5'Perse cution wh y wo n't th e B ritish p olice do the ir job a nd put a st op to it? -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- -= why won't the British police do their job and put a stop. to it? -= -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- The British police obviously do know what is taking place. Besides. my interpretations of what. individual officers have said which forces that conclusion, it would be inconceivable. for them to be unaware of something on this. scale. If they know,. then they will know that the abusers have broken laws in the UK and abroad. Recently. the UK introduced laws against electronic spying which carry a penalty of several. years jail if caught. If the police know illegal harassment is taking place, and do nothing. about it, then they are failing in their. responsibilities. Last Easter (1995) I. went into the local police station in London and spoke to an officer. about the harassment against me. But I couldn't provide tangible evidence; what people said, in many cases years ago, is. beyond proof, and. without something to support my statements I cannot expect a police officer to take. the complaint seriously. The current situation with regard to the police is not one which. allows a breakthrough in. dealing with the problem. On the one hand, most individual officers at a local police. station may not know about the ongoing assaults, so a complaint at that level will not yield results.. Yet the police as an organisation do know of the harassment, and they must be aware. that a complaint has been made at a police station.. So it is clearly their duty to take. preventative action against the continuing molestation, but because the criminals are operating on behalf of a state agency, the. police are not carrying. out their duty. 1747 Tag: crashed DC1 server Tag: 176335
  - 8
    - M,I`5,Persec ution why w on't t he Britis h p olice do th eir job an d p ut a st op to it ? -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- -= why won't the British police do. their job and put a stop to it? -= -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- The British police obviously. do know what is taking place. Besides my interpretations. of what individual officers have said which forces that conclusion, it would be inconceivable for them to be. unaware of something on this. scale. If they know, then they will know that the. abusers have broken laws in the UK and. abroad. Recently the UK introduced laws against electronic spying which carry a penalty. of several years jail if caught. If the police know illegal harassment is taking. place, and do nothing about it, then they are failing in. their responsibilities. Last Easter (1995) I went into the local police station in. London and spoke to an officer about the harassment. against me. But I couldn't provide tangible evidence; what people said, in many cases years ago,. is beyond proof, and without something to support. my statements I cannot expect a police officer. to take the complaint seriously. The current situation with regard to the. police is not one which allows a breakthrough in dealing with the. problem. On the one hand, most individual officers at a local police station may not know. about the ongoing assaults, so a. complaint at that level will not yield results. Yet the police as an organisation do know of the harassment, and. they must be aware that a complaint has. been made at a police station. So it is clearly their duty to take. preventative action against the continuing molestation, but because the criminals. are operating on behalf of a state agency, the police are not carrying out. their duty. 1747 Tag: crashed DC1 server Tag: 176334
  - 9
    - M,I`5 Persecutio n ' Bern ard Le vin expr esses hi s v iews The article of which part is reproduced below was penned. by Bernard Levin for the Features. section of the Times on 21 September 1991. To my mind, it described the situation at the time and in. particular a recent meeting with a. friend, during which I for the first time admitted to someone other than my GP that I had been subjected to. a conspiracy of harassment over the previous year and. a half. >There is a madman. running loose about London, called David Campbell; I have >no reason to believe that. he is violent, but he should certainly be >approached with caution. You may know. him by the curious glitter in his >eyes and a persistent trembling of his hands; if. that does not suffice, you >will find him attempting to thrust no. fewer than 48 books into your arms, >all. hardbacks, with a promise that, if you should return to the same >meeting-place next year, he will heave another 80. at you. > >If, by now, the police have arrived and are keeping a close watch. on him, >you may feel sufficiently emboldened to examine the books.. The jackets are >a model of uncluttered typography, elegantly and simply laid out;. there is >an unobtrusive colophon of a rising sun, probably not picked. at random. >Gaining confidence - the lunatic is smiling by now, and the. policemen, who >know about. such things, have significantly removed their helmets - you >could do worse than take the jacket off the first book. in the pile. The >only word. possible to describe the binding is sumptuous; real cloth in a >glorious shade of dark green, with the. title and author in black and gold >on the. spine. > >Look at it more closely; your eyes do not deceive you -. it truly does have >real top-bands. and tail-bands, in yellow, and, for good measure, a silk >marker ribbon in a. lighter green. The paper is cream-wove and acid-free, >and the book is sewn, not. glued. > >Throughout the encounter, I should have mentioned,. our loony has been >chattering away, although what he is trying to say is. almost impossible to >understand;. after a time, however, he becomes sufficiently coherent to make >clear that he is trying to sell the books to. you. Well, now, such quality >in bookmaking today can only be for collectors' limited editions. at a >fearsome price -. #30, #40, #50? > >No,. no, he says, the glitter more powerful than ever and the trembling of >his hands rapidly spreading throughout his entire body; no, no - the. books >are priced variously at #7, #8 or #9, with. the top price #12. > >At this, the. policemen understandably put their helmets back on; one of >them draws his truncheon and the other. can be heard summoning >reinforcements on his walkie-talkie. The madman bursts into tears,. and >swears. it is all true. > >And it. is. > >David Campbell has acquired the entire rights. to the whole of the >Everyman's Library, which died a lingering and shameful. death a decade or >so ago, and he proposes. to start it all over again - 48 volumes this >September and 80 more next year, in editions I have. described, at the >prices specified. He proposes to. launch his amazing venture simultaneously >in Britain and the United States,. with the massive firepower of Random >Century at his back in. this country, and the dashing cavalry of Knopf >across the water, and no one. who loves literature and courage will forbear >to. cheer. At the time this article was. written I had believed for some time that columnists in the Times and other. journalists had been making references to my situation. Nothing unusual about. this you may think, plenty of people have the same sort of ideas and obviously the papers aren't. writing about them, so. why should my beliefs not be as false as those of others? What makes this article so extraordinary is. that three or four days immediately preceding its publication,. I had a meeting with a friend, during the course of which. we discussed the media persecution, and in particular. that by Times columnists. It seemed to me, reading the article by Levin in Saturday?s paper, that he was describing. in some detail his "artist?s impression" of that. meeting. Most telling are the final sentences, when he writes, "The madman bursts into tears, and swears. it is all true. And it is." Although I did not "burst into tears" (he seems. to be using. a bit of poetic licence and exaggerating) I did try hard to convince my. friend that it was all true; and I am able to concur with Mr Levin, because, of course,. it is. At the beginning of the piece. Levin reveals a fear of being attacked by the "irrational" subject of his story,. saying "I have no reason to believe that he is violent, but he should certainly. be approached with caution". This goes back to. the xenophobic propaganda of "defence" against a "threat" which was seen at the very beginning of the harassment.. The impression of a "madman running loose" who needs to be controlled through an. agency which assigns to. itself the mantle of the "police" is also one which had been expressed. elsewhere. In the. final paragraph of this extract, his reference to Everyman?s Library as having "died a lingering and shameful death a decade. or so ago" shows clearly what sort of conclusion they. wish to their campaign. They want a permanent solution, and as they. are prevented from achieving that solution directly, they waste. significant resources on methods which have been repeatedly. shown to be ineffective for such a purpose. 1747 Tag: crashed DC1 server Tag: 176333
  - 10
    - M,I-5'P ersecution Berna rd Levi n expre sses h is views The article of which part is reproduced below was penned by Bernard. Levin for the Features section of the Times on 21. September 1991. To my mind, it described the situation at the time. and in particular a recent meeting with a friend, during which I. for the first time admitted to someone other than my GP that I had been subjected to a conspiracy of. harassment over the previous. year and a half. >There is a madman running loose. about London, called David Campbell; I have >no reason to believe that he is. violent, but he should certainly be >approached with caution. You may know him by. the curious glitter in his >eyes and a. persistent trembling of his hands; if that does not suffice, you >will find him attempting to thrust no. fewer than 48 books into your arms, >all hardbacks, with. a promise that, if you should return to the same >meeting-place next year, he will heave. another 80 at you. > >If, by now, the police have arrived and are. keeping a close watch on him, >you. may feel sufficiently emboldened to examine the books. The jackets are >a model of uncluttered typography, elegantly and simply laid out;. there is >an unobtrusive colophon of a rising. sun, probably not picked at random. >Gaining confidence - the lunatic is smiling by now,. and the policemen, who >know about such things, have significantly removed their. helmets - you >could do worse than take the jacket off the first book. in the pile. The >only word possible to describe the binding is sumptuous; real cloth in. a >glorious shade of dark green, with the title and. author in black and gold >on the. spine. > >Look at it more closely; your eyes. do not deceive you - it truly does have >real top-bands and tail-bands, in yellow,. and, for good measure, a silk >marker ribbon in a lighter green. The paper is cream-wove. and acid-free, >and the book is sewn, not. glued. > >Throughout. the encounter, I should have mentioned, our loony has been >chattering away, although what he is trying to say is almost impossible. to >understand; after a. time, however, he becomes sufficiently coherent to make >clear that he is trying to. sell the books to you. Well, now, such quality >in bookmaking today. can only be for collectors' limited editions at a >fearsome price -. #30, #40, #50? > >No, no, he says, the glitter more powerful than ever and. the trembling of >his hands rapidly spreading throughout his entire body; no, no. - the books >are priced variously. at #7, #8 or #9, with the top price #12. > >At this, the policemen. understandably put their helmets back on; one of >them draws his truncheon and the other. can be heard summoning >reinforcements on his walkie-talkie. The madman bursts. into tears, and >swears it is. all true. > >And it. is. > >David Campbell has acquired. the entire rights to the whole of the >Everyman's Library, which died a lingering. and shameful death a decade or >so ago, and he proposes. to start it all over again - 48 volumes this >September and 80 more next year, in editions. I have described, at the >prices specified. He proposes to. launch his amazing venture simultaneously >in Britain and the United States,. with the massive firepower of Random >Century at his. back in this country, and the dashing cavalry of Knopf >across the water, and no one who loves. literature and courage will forbear >to. cheer. At the. time this article was written I had believed for some time that columnists in the Times and other journalists. had been making references to my situation. Nothing unusual about this you may think, plenty. of people have the same sort of ideas and obviously the. papers aren't writing about them, so why should my beliefs. not be as false as those of others? What makes this article so extraordinary is. that three or four days immediately preceding its publication, I had. a meeting with a friend, during the course of which we discussed the media. persecution, and in particular that by Times. columnists. It seemed to me, reading the article by Levin in Saturday?s paper, that he. was describing in some detail his "artist?s impression". of that meeting. Most telling are the final sentences,. when he writes, "The madman bursts into tears, and swears it is all true. And. it is." Although I did not "burst into tears" (he seems to be using a bit. of poetic licence and exaggerating) I did try hard to convince my friend that it was all true; and I am able to concur with Mr. Levin, because,. of course, it is. At the. beginning of the piece Levin reveals a fear of being attacked by the "irrational" subject of. his story, saying "I have no reason to believe that he is violent, but he should certainly be. approached with caution". This goes back to the xenophobic propaganda of "defence" against. a "threat" which was seen. at the very beginning of the harassment. The impression of a "madman running loose" who needs to be controlled. through an agency which assigns to itself. the mantle of the "police" is also one which had been expressed. elsewhere. In the final paragraph. of this extract, his reference to Everyman?s Library as having "died a lingering and shameful death a decade or. so ago" shows clearly what sort of. conclusion they wish to their campaign. They want a permanent. solution, and as they are prevented from achieving that solution directly, they. waste significant resources on methods which have been repeatedly shown to. be ineffective for such a purpose. 6607 Tag: crashed DC1 server Tag: 176332
  - 11
    - M`I,5.Pe rsecution - who knows abo ut i t? -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- -= who knows about it?. =- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Many people know, both in the establishment and media, and. among the general public. Despite an absence. of its target from the UK for more than two years, the echoes of paranoia can still be heard loud and clear. from across the water. When it started in 1990,. the only people who knew were those in BBC television who. were spying on my home, and a few radio broadcasters. There were a few cases. of public harassment, but very little compared. to the situation that developed a couple of years later. The list today. includes BBC TV staff (newsreaders such as Martyn Lewis, Michael. Buerk, Nicholas Witchell), people from radio stations such as Chris Tarrant of Capital and Radio 1 DJs, people in the print media,. but also. many people in the general public. All united in a conspiracy which breaks the laws which the UK does. have regarding harassment, and all completely uncaring. for any semblance of decency or elementary respect for individual. rights. The British police (obviously) do know the nature of. the harassment and in all probability the identity of those. behind it. Some time ago I made a complaint to my local police station in. London, without positive result. The UK police are failing in their duty to see the law enforced in. not checking. the abuse. 4177 Tag: crashed DC1 server Tag: 176331
  - 12
    - M'I.5,Persecu tion , h ow a nd wh y did it start ? -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- -= how and why did. it start? -= -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- The harassment didn't start by itself, so someone must. have been there at the outset to give it a firm push and set the "animals" after. me. It looks as. if I was set up in June 1990, and the timing indicates someone from university was. responsible. >One thing which. has been missing from this discussion is this simple >prognosis: that maybe he is right. and that, despite his admitted >mental condition, there really is a campaign. against him organised by >now-influential ex-students of his. university. In May or. June 1990, Alan Freeman on Radio 1 read out a letter from someone who had known me for a. few years, who wrote of the one who "wore out his welcome with random. precision" (from the Pink Floyd song). Freeman went on to say to the writer "that's a hell of a letter you wrote there".. The indication is strongly that people I had parted from. soon before nursed a grudge against me and were trying. to cause trouble for me. The suggestion is. that Freeman might have shown the letter to other people, and things could have. snowballed from there. Right from the start the real source (security services presumed) didn't. announce themselves as the origin, but let the "talkers", the radio DJs, believe that. they were the originators. Think about it; if you announce, "we're MI5 and we. have a campaign against this bloke" then people might not go along with. it; but if you say, "everyone else is. getting at this bloke because he 'deserves' it" then. people will join in with fewer qualms. >Why would "they" wish. to assassinate your character? It's the classic case of hitting a cripple to prove you're stronger.. Why would the security services expend hundreds of thousands of. pounds and more than six years of manpower to try to kill. a British citizen? Because they are motivated by people who knew me. at university and feel personal animosity; because they knew me. to be emotionally weak, and it is in the nature of bullies to prey. on those known to be weak; and because they can rely on the complicity of the establishment, which. the security services manipulate and. derive funding from. This is England's biggest humiliation today, and. the British security services are intent on preventing their humiliation becoming reality by continuing. their campaign of attempted murder. to suppress the truth from becoming public. 1747 Tag: crashed DC1 server Tag: 176330
  - 13
    - M.I'5`P ersecution . cost of th e op eration -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= -=. MI5: cost of the operation -= -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Here's what a couple of other people on. Usenet (uk.misc) had to say regarding the. cost of running such an operation... PO:. >Have some sense, grow up and smell reality. What you are talking about PO: >would take loads of planning, tens of thousands of. pounds and lots of PO: >people involved in the planning, execution and maintenance. of it. You PO: >must have a very high opinion of yourself. to think you are worth it. PM: >But why? And why you? Do you realize how much it. would cost to keep PM: >one person. under continuous surveillance for five years? Think about PM: >all the man/hours. Say they _just_ allocated a two. man team and a PM:. >supervisor. OK., Supervisor's salary, say, #30,000 a year. Two men, PM: >#20,000 a year each. But they'd need to work in. shifts -- so it would PM: >be six men at #20,000 (which with on-costs would work. out at more like PM: >#30,000. to the employer.) PM:. > PM: >So, we're talking #30,000 x 6. #180,000. plus say,. #40,000 for the PM: >supervisor. #220,000.. Then you've got the hardware involved. And PM: >any transcription that needs doing.. You don't think the 'Big Boss' PM: >would listen to hours and hours. of tapes, do you. PM:. > PM: >So, all in all, you couldn't actually do the job for much. less than PM: >a quarter million. a year. Over five years. What are you doing that makes PM: >it worth the while of the state to. spend over one and a quarter million PM: >on. you? Those are pretty. much the sort of calculations that went through my head once I stopped to consider what. it must be costing them to run this operation. The partial answer is, there have been periods. when the intensity has been greater, and times when. little has happened. In fact, for much of 1993 and. the first half of 1994, very little happened. Although I. don't think that was for reasons of money - if they can tap into the taxpayer they're not going to. be short of resources, are they? The more complete answer is in the enormity of what. they're doing. Relative to the cost to British pride of. seeing their country humiliated for the persecution of their own citizens, isn't is worth the cost of four or. five people to try. to bring things to a close in the manner they would wish? To the government. a million or two is quite honestly nothing - if they can convince themselves of the necessity. of what they're doing, resources will not be the limiting. factor. 9037 Tag: crashed DC1 server Tag: 176329
  - 14
    - M I-5 Persec ution , Capit al Radi o - Ch ris Tarra nt -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-= -= Capital Radio - Chris. Tarrant -= -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-= Capital Radio DJs have been "in on it". from the start. One of the first things I heard in the summer of 1990 was from a Capital DJ. who said, "If he listens to Capital then he can't be all. bad" (supportive, you see. We're not bastards). Much of what came over the radio in 1990 is now. so far away the. precise details have been obliterated by time. No diary was kept of the details,. and although archives if they exist may give pointers, the ambiguity of what broadcasters said would. leave that open to re-interpretation. In spring 1994, Chris Tarrant on his Capital morning show made. an aside to someone else in the studio, about. a person he didn't identify. He said, "You. know this bloke? He says we're trying to kill him. We should be done for attempted. manslaughter". That mirrored. something I had said a day or two before. What Tarrant said was understood by the staff member in the studio he. was saying it to; they said, "Oh no, don't say that" to Tarrant. If any archives exist of. the morning show (probably unlikely) then it could be. found there; what he said was so out of context that he would be. very hard put to find an explanation. A couple of days later, someone. at the site where I was working repeated the remark although in a different way; they said there had been people. in a computer room when automatic fire extinguishers went off. and those people were "thinking of suing for. attempted manslaughter". Finally, this isn't confined to the. established radio stations. In 1990 after I had listened to a pirate radio station in South. London for about half an hour, there was an audible phone call in the background,. followed by total silence for a few moments, then shrieks of laughter. "So. what are we supposed to say. now? Deadly torture? He's going to talk to us now, isn't he?",. which meant that they could hear what I would say in my room. 6607 Tag: crashed DC1 server Tag: 176327
  - 15
    - M`I 5.Persecution . bu gging a nd counter-surveill ance -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- -= MI5: bugging and. counter-surveillance -= -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- PO: >Did. you ever look for the bugs in your house ? If not, why not ? I mean if PO: >I thought that was happening to me,. I'd search the place from top to bottom, PO: >I mean I live there. I would know if anything was out of place. If I was PO: >really suspicious, I would call in one of those bug detection. teams which PO: >have those machines. that pick up the transmitted radio waves. This PO: >reminds me of BUGS,. that new programme on BBC1 on That's exactly. what we did. We went to a competent, professional detective agency in London,. paid them over 400 quid to debug our house. They used scanner. devices which go to over 1 GHz and would pick up any nearby transmitter in that range, they. also checked the phones and found nothing... but if the. tap was at the exchange, then they wouldn't find anything,. would they? CS:. >Doesn't this suggest to you that there are, in fact, no bugs to be found? You can assume. that they've done this sort of thing to other people in more "serious" cases, where they would know. the targets would suspect the presence of electronic surveillance. So they. will have developed techniques and devices which are not readily detectable either. by visual inspection or by. electronic means. What those techniques might be, I couldn't guess. In this case, the existence. of bugging devices was clear from the beginning, and they "rubbed it in" with what was. said by the boy on the coach. It was almost as if they wanted counter-surveillance people. to be called in, who. they knew would fail to detect the bugging devices, causing loss of credibility to the other. things I would have to say relating to the harassment. I did all. the things someone in my situation would do to try to find the bugs. In addition. to calling in professional help using electronic counter-surveillance, I made. a close visual inspection of electrical equipment, plus any points where audio. or video surveillance devices might have. been concealed. Of course, I found nothing. Normal surveillance "mini-cameras" are. quite noticeable and require visible supporting circuitry. It seems to. me the best place to put a small video surveillance device would be additional to a piece of electronic equipment such as a. TV or video. It would be necessary to physically break in to a property. to fit such a. device. 4177 Tag: crashed DC1 server Tag: 176326
  - 16
    - M'I.5,Persecution ' th e BBC, telev ision and r adio -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-= -= the. BBC, television and radio -= -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-= The first incident in June 1990 was when a BBC newsreader made what. seemed to be a reaction to something which had. happened in my home, and out of context. of what they were reading. My first reaction was disbelief; nothing of the sort had ever happened before, the idea that such a. thing could occur had not. crossed my mind, yet there was no doubt of what had just taken place. My. disbelief eroded as this recurred time after time. Besides the news, offenders included shows such as. Crimewatch (!), Newsnight, and "entertainment" shows. There seems to be very. little moral understanding among the people who make these. programmes; they just assume they will never be caught, so. they carry on without a thought for the illegality or amorality of what they do. The only time I. ever heard a word raised in doubt was by Paxman being interviewed by someone. else (I think by Clive Anderson) back in 1990; referring to. the "watching" he said it troubled him, and. when asked by the host what you could do about it, replied "Well, you. could just switch it off" (meaning the surveillance monitor in the studio). He clearly didn't let his doubts stand in the way of. continued surreptitious spying from his own or other people's shows,. though. Now you're convinced this. is a troll, aren't you? This story has been the subject of much debate on the uk.* Usenet newsgroups for over a year,. and some readers believe it to be an invention (it has even been. suggested that a. group of psychology students are responsible!), others think it symptomatic of. a derangement of the author, and a few give it credence. Quite. a few people do know part or all of the story already, so this text will fill in the gaps in. their knowledge. For the rest, what may persuade you of the third possibility. is that some of the incidents detailed are checkable against any archives. of radio and TV programmes that exist; that the incidents involve named people. (even if those hiding in the shadows have not. made their identity or affiliations evident), and those people may be persuaded to come out with. the truth; and that the campaign of harassment is continuing today both in the UK and on. the American continent, in a. none-too-secret fashion; by its nature the significant risk of exposure increases with. time. On several occasions people said to my face that. harassment from the TV was happening. On the first. day I worked in Oxford, I spent the evening in the local pub with the company's. technical director Ian, and Phil, another employee. Ian made a few references to me and said to. Phil, as if in an aside, "Is he the bloke who's been on TV?" to which. Phil replied, "Yes, I think. so". I made a number of efforts to find the bugs, without. success; last year we employed professional counter-surveillance people. to scan for bugs (see later) again without result. In autumn. 1990 I disposed of my TV and watched virtually. no television for the next three years. But harassment from TV stations. has gone on for over six years and continues to this day. This is something that many people. obviously know is happening; yet the TV staff have. the morality of paedophiles, that because they're getting away with it they feel no. wrong. Other people who were involved in the abuse in. 1990 were DJs on BBC radio stations, notably disc jockeys from Radio 1 and other stations. (see the following section).. Again, since they don't have sense in the first place they can't be expect to have the moral sense not to be. part of criminal harassment. 1747 Tag: crashed DC1 server Tag: 176325
  - 17
    - how to remove nt4 pdc from Win2000 AD? dear all, i've a Win2000 AD built up 2 years ago and the nt4 pdc is still left inside the AD under "Active Directory Users and Computers" --> "Domain Controllers". i want to delete it from the AD, however, i got an error saying "DSA object cannot be deleted." how can i clean this up? thx in advance!!! and happy new year to u all!!! regards, LM Tag: crashed DC1 server Tag: 176313
  - 18
    - Removing an old user from Active Directory? Is there anything special that needs to be done when removing a user from Active Directory Users and Computers? Remove seems too simple. I am sure there will be "junk" lying about. Thanks. Oh Windows 2000 SP 4 Advanced Server. -- George Hester _________________________________ Tag: crashed DC1 server Tag: 176307
  - 19
    - Help! I just inatalled Microsoft Virtual PC 2007 on my laptop and i made a new virtual disk and it wont boot! it keeps saying " Reboot and select proper boot device or insert boot media in selected boot device" What do i do?? Tag: crashed DC1 server Tag: 176304
  - 20
    - big problem with active directory I made a mistake and now don't have any user without active directory restrictions the problem is that i have the Adminstrator password, but the desktop is like the same desktop of all the other users, is there any way to undo this, or to somehow enter de users and move the administrator back to a folder without restrictions. Please i need help Tag: crashed DC1 server Tag: 176302
  - 21
    - External Associated Account Greetings All, I am in a bit of a jam, I am new to scripting and I am trying to figure out how I can script the "Associated External Account" in Exchange to a account in a trusted domain and not the usual "SELF" account. Ideally the script would call a input file such as a txt file or csv since I am trying to perform a batch modify of about 500 users at a time. I have found several articles and scripts that perform the function individually but not a batch method. I am having trouble trying to tie it in with a input file, I am a newbie when it comes to scripting so bear with me. Any help or direction would be kindly appreciated. Thank you. Vid Tag: crashed DC1 server Tag: 176301
  - 22
    - External Associated Account Greetings All, I am in a bit of a jam, I am new to scripting and I am trying to figure out how I can script the "Associated External Account" in Exchange to a account in a trusted domain and not the usual "SELF" account. Ideally the script would call a input file such as a txt file or csv since I am trying to perform a batch modify of about 500 users at a time. I have found several articles and scripts that perform the function individually but not a batch method. I am having trouble trying to tie it in with a input file, I am a newbie when it comes to scripting so bear with me. Any help or direction would be kindly appreciated. Thank you. Vid Tag: crashed DC1 server Tag: 176300
  - 23
    - M'I.5,Per secution , BB C N ewscasters Li e & Deny The yre Wa tching Me MI5 Persecution: BBC Newscasters. Lie & Deny They're Watching Me Central to the persecution campaign waged against me. for some nine years now by. the Security Service is their use of the media, and in particular the broadcast media, to make clear to me that I am. under surveillance and being watched within my own home, even. by BBC newscasters while they read the news. This is really an act of arrogance; MI5. and their tools in the television and radio are so sure. that they can never be caught, that they have many. times made explicity clear on broadcast programmes that they are as capable of. seeing me as I am of seeing the broadcast pictures. Even when they have known I am taping the programmes. they still carry on this practice; for examples. of TVand radio presenters caught "in action", see the Evidence area of my. website. If you wish. to reply to this article...... then please include your name and fax number! I provide the means. for recipients. to send me their thoughts on the topics discussed, but ask that you. provide me with your fax number or email address if you require a response. Also would you please send not more than one or. two pages, if by fax.. Thank-you! It. started with a Newscaster, and it continues with Newscasters today The very first. incident in the story started with a reaction by an ITN newscaster, Sue Carpenter, in June of 1990, almost nine years ago. now. She reacted to what she. saw in my living room at home as she read the news. My mother. had brought an apple for me into the room, whereupon the newsreader smirked and giggled, apparently finding this funny. I. couldn't believe what I was seeing. I. carried on watching news and other television programmes to see if presenters would. show signs of "interactive watching"; to my surprise, this happened again and again.. Unfortunately, I did not have my wits sufficiently about me to videotape these. programmes, and it is. now almost impossible to obtain recordings dating back to 1990. However, I have. been busy recording everything Ive watched the last couple of years, and the taping has yielded some nuggets, which you will. find if you. point your Web browser at the "evidence" area of my website, whose URL address is given above. Strangely it is. not particularly the BBC who are "after me" at the moment (with the. exception of occasional fire from Nicholas. Witchell), but that supposed paragon of virtue and decency Jon Snow. of Channel Four TV News (he actually works for ITN), who once claimed hed turned down MI5s offer of a tax-free salary. I will cover. Snows recent actions in a future. article. BBCs. Hidden Shame The first ever Usenet post (internet newsgroup article) on. the subject of the MI5 bugging / BBC watching occurred,. as stated in a previous article, in early May 1995. It. is reproduced here; Date: Thu May. 4 18:27:24 1995 Newsgroups:. alt.conspiracy Subject: BBC's Hidden. Shame Remember the two-way televisions in George. Orwell's 1984? The ones which watched you back? Which you could never get. rid of, only the sound could be turned. down? Well. the country which brought Orwell into the world has made his nightmare follow into the world after him. Since 1990. the British have been waging war against one of their own citizens. using surveillance to invade privacy and a campaign of abuse in the transmitted. media in their efforts to humiliate. their "victim". I suppose "BBCs Hidden Shame" is more. of a wish than a fact. It may be hidden, but the BBC and other media and security organisations seem. to have no shame whatever in their. anti-social, not to say criminal, actions. Nor do. the general public, who seem quite happy to parrot the vilest. obscenities without much hesitation or apparently thought. Martyn Lewis, Nicholas Witchell and. the rest Most of the harassment occurred in 1990-92, when I. wasnt making any recordings, and the BBC wont. release copies of current affairs programmes from that. period.... so although I can remember there were many incidents in that. time, even many specifics, I cant dig up the actual programmes to flesh. out the bones. This year, there. has been at least one incident with Nicholas Witchell as newsreader, which I have. successfully recorded and digitized, i.e. converted into a computer Quicktime movie file.. This has not yet found its way onto my website (Im a busy man, dontcha. know) but you can be sure I will let. the readership of these articles know when that clip makes it onto the web.. The Witchell clip was recorded on Saturday 10 April 1999 at. 7pm, and shows Witchell trying to restrain his features from collapsing into a smirk. First his upper lip quivers for several. minutes, then with the non-excuse of a non-joke. his entire face twists into a grin. It looks as if he finds me so funny, that he allows. himself to submerge any pretence at professionalism in a sea of MI5-inspired. sarcasm and harassment. The two. BBC newscasters whose reactions to me I can remember most vividly over the years. are Martyn Lewis and Nicholas Witchell. I can remember thinking. years ago that Michael Buerk was also seeing me at home; and if the other two are watching then there. would be no reason why he wouldnt be doing the same; but in all honesty I cannot remember. a single clear instance of his. reacting through facial or verbal expression to me. I can remember several instances of Martyn Lewis. reacting to what he saw of me, however. In early 1992 I was watching the BBC news with Lewis. on a small black-and-white portable TV at my. then home in Oxford. I threw a term of abuse. at Lewis; he flinched, then gave a grin and made a comment from which I. understood that he had been on my side, but might have changed his mind as a. result of what Id just said to him. And in spring 1991 I remember Martyn Lewis clearly. reacting to what he saw of me at my then accommodation in. Woking, Surrey, by continuing to stare at some fixed point near the camera after. the news had finished - presumably this is where the monitor interactively showing pictures. of my room was. located. Why would BBC and other Newscasters Watch and Harass Me,. Watching Them? This is a very difficult question,. and I dont actually know the answer. It is a matter of record that the Secret Services are very. much part of the Establishment. The recent exposure of the "MI6 Agent List" on. the internet, and its coverage in the newspapers, reveals how much MI5. and MI6 are recruited from the. ranks of the Establishment. Obviously the relationship is bi-directional; the Establishment influences MI5/MI6,. but the secret services (well, perhaps not so secret now we know who works. for MI6!!!) also influence. the machinery of power and information dissemination i.e. media in this country. So they. must have a lot of covert leverage with the BBC. and ITN. Some of this leverage is obviously through bribery. It is. a matter of record that MI5 tried some years ago to "buy". Jon Snow of Channel Four TV. He turned them down - obviously they. must have approached other media people as well, and from the lack of other reports of people turning. them down, it may be presumed that some. other journalists will have accepted the sugared carrots. put before them. Ironically, Jon Snow has been taking part in the. recent "watching" actions against me - but why he has allowed himself to be used by the secret services is something which I do. not know. Perhaps the Security Service uses blackmail to twist. arms of journalists into co-operating with them? I have always thought there. was something slightly odd about Martyn. Lewiss demeanour. At the time of the Ron Davies "rough trade" scandal it was. reported that MI5 had known all about Davies predilections and the sham of. his pretence to be a happily married man. Perhaps MI5. have been able to dig something up from Martyn Lewiss private life to blackmail. him into acting on their behalf? And if there wasnt anything before the. "newscaster watching" started then there most certainly is. something now.... once theyve started watching, the newscasters will surely. wish their activities to remain covered-up, and co-operate with the security. service. "Newscaster Watching" Deliberately. Constructed to Mimic Schizophrenia Presumably this. is the first case in history of television journalists actually taking part in acts. of real-time, live spying and reacting against one of their viewers. What you have. to understand, though, is that I was quite mentally healthy in June 1990, certainly relative. to November 1992, when after two and a half. years of harassment I was finally admitted to hospital as an out-patient. MI5 decided. from the outset that they would make me mad;. they constructed the media harassment to resemble what would be. reported by a person with mental illness; and then they carried on years of abuse to inflict on. me the condition which they wished to use as an. excuse to cover up their abuses. I sold. my portable TV in autumn 1990 and stopped watching television regularly. I realise now that this may have. been a mistake. What I should have done was to watch TV. and listen to the radio, but tape-record everything and make a note. of what each excerpt meant to me. I would then be in. a much stronger position as regards to evidence that I am now. That is. what I am trying to do now, but unsurprisingly the TV/radio presenters have stopped getting at me,. now they know they are being recorded. When I started publicising my case on. internet newsgroups in 1995, I was met with the disbelief one might expect to. be accorded to a mentally ill person who talks about. "newscaster watching" and media persecution. Some newsgroup participants thought I had started a "troll",. an invention made to obtain a. reaction; one bright spark even suggested a group of psychology students were behind the articles.. But most people thought the articles were symptomatic of. derangement - and that is exactly what MI5 want people to think. MI5 chose me. as a target because I was mildly mentally ill at the outset in 1990, although I. stress my illness then was very mild in comparison with November. 1992, and because they knew that enough abuse would. (a) make me much more seriously ill, and (b) once I was more ill, they would "get away" with a harassment deliberately. constructed to. look like the symptoms of paranoid schizophrenia. Martyn Lewis Denies & Lies, But Wont in. Writing In February 1997 I wrote. to BBC Viewer & Listener Correspondence and asked them to investigate the claim that their newscasters had engaged. in "real-time spying" on me. They. replied that they had asked Martyn Lewis and Michael Buerk whether. they had engaged in such practices, and that they had both made verbal denials to VLC, but were refusing to put. their denials in. writing. To me it looks as if Lewis. and Buerk are happy to lie verbally but not in writing, because written falsehoods would place them unambiguously in. the wrong, whereas they can try. to talk their way out of verbal lies if they are ever caught, or perhaps even. deny the verbal lies completely? If they lie without shame, then why would they have any shame about. future lies about. lying? BBC-VLC also said that the BBC "would never engage. in any form of surveillance activity" such as that described. Clearly. Martyn Lewis and the. rest have lied to their own organisations personnel about their criminal actions. So much for the "objective", "truthful" BBC, a. nest of shabby. liars. Summons against the BBC, for Nuisance. caused by Newscaster Spying In March 1997. I issued a civil summons against the BBC, seeking injunction against further "newscaster spying",. and token damages for what the BBC had done to me until that date. The. purpose of the summons was to try to "smoke out". the BBC, since obviously I did not have good evidence which would be necessary for. either a civil or criminal case to be made against them. My summons was. worded as follows; 1.. The plaintiff is and was at all material times residing at [home address]. At. some time prior to or during June 1990, persons of unknown identity entered. Plaintiff's premises and installed concealed television equipment. in said premises. 2. A campaign of harassment was launched against the Plaintiff. by the persons of unknown identity, which. in part took the form of instigating harassment by BBC TV newscasters (including specifically Michael. Buerk and Martyn Lewis) as they read news bulletins,. by making direct and personal comments. to Plaintiff. 3. The. campaigns purpose was to subject Plaintiff to great mental stress and induce mental breakdown. As a result of it Plaintiff did. indeed suffer from severe mental strain. in 1990-97. 4. In order to avoid the mental strain. being caused to him the Plaintiff has been. compelled to stop watching BBC TV news. Defendant therefore committed the. tort of private nuisance, since normal use of home was interfered. with. 5. Plaintiff claims a permanent. injunction prohibiting further nuisance, and. damages for nuisance suffered limited to 5,000. Naturally, my attempt to smoke-out the BBC. and its lying newscasters failed. The BBCs litigation department sought to have my summons. struck out; and they succeeded in. doing so, on the grounds of my action "disclosing no reasonable cause of action". I was also prevented. from issuing further civil claims against. the BBC without leave of the Court. Apparently litigants-in-person frequently /. usually have their claims struck out with this wording,. regardless of the merit of their claims. BBC Suppresses my Claims of "Watching. by Newscasters" BBCs staff magazine Ariel ran my advert "BBC. Newsreaders Spying on my home" for one issue in the Personal category on 8/July/1997 before it. was spotted. and axed by editor Robin Reynolds; please see webpage;. http://www.pair.com/spook/evidence/plaint/ariel.htm Clearly the BBC will not. allow claims of its wrongdoing to be made public in. the media channels it controls. On. several occasions people said to my face that harassment from the TV was happening. On the first day. I worked in Oxford, I spent the evening in the local pub the Rose. and Crown with the company's technical director Ian,. and Phil, another employee. Ian made a few references to me and said to. Phil, as if in an aside, "Is he the bloke who's been on TV?" to which Phil. replied, "Yes, I think so". The reader might. think that mere "watching" by newscasters etc might be a relatively benign happening. But. it is not; it is part of MI5s framework of harassment and lies.. On many occasions the reactions of the BBCs newscasters to me has been in. the nature of sarcasm, implicit contempt and abuse. This is visible in Witchells news programme mentioned. above, where he engages in abuse by laughing at me. during his newsreading. It was particularly. visible in the early period of 1990-92, and as late as Autumn 1993, when during. a Newsnight broadcast Jeremy Paxman interviewed a football. person about soccer hooliganism, and the interviewee gave vent to an unsubtle rant. about "theyre idiots, theyre just idiots, keep up the surveillance". Paxman started grinning, showing. he understood and was taking part. in the abuse being perpetrated on that programme. Conclusion The MI5 Persecution started with harassment. by television newscasters, and today harassment by TV and radio presenters still forms. a key part of MI5s activities against me. When this. business started in June 1990 I was in relatively good health of mind. Years of persecution. by the secret police and their mouthpieces in the state-run BBC and other. media eroded my health until MI5 achieved their aim of seeing. me rendered mentally ill in November 1992. The diagnosis which was forced on me. unfortunately and ironically meant that. my reports of the harassment are disregarded, because the mentally ill are. second-class citizens in todays Britain. Yet TV and radio harassment continues, albeit in a reduced form,. despite my taping. all the programmes I watch, resulting in my being able to obtain and demonstrate objectively. on the website instances of media presenters attacking me. Unfortunately these. recorded instances are quite tenuous; I might understand them, the presenters understand what it is theyre. doing, but despite many thousands of people knowing the truth of the. "newscaster watching", the omerta continues and they continue to refuse to. admit the truth of the matter. It is a terrible indictment of British. society that there is not even one decent person willing to. speak out. I look forward to. the day when the truth does finally emerge, and the mass corruption which has allowed the MI5 persecution to take place is. finally purged and the Establishment criminals. caught and appropriately punished. 5407 Tag: crashed DC1 server Tag: 176297
  - 24
    - M-I'5-Persecu tion . Four Years of MI 5 Persec ution P osts on Inter net Newsgr oups Four Years of. "MI5 Persecution" Posts on Internet Newsgroups For approximately the first three years of. the MI5 persecution, from June 1990 until late 1992, I kept as quiet as possible, in. the hope that by not reacting, MI5s interest in me would. decrease and they would simply go away of their own accord. This is the. sort of behaviour some people employ against. bullies; if the bullies arent getting a reaction, then they might simply go away. and victimize someone else. Unfortunately, this. tactic didnt work. The quieter I became, the more shrill and hysterical the noise from the Security Service. operatives. For about two years I didnt watch TV news at all. Yet. this only heightened their obsessed fixation; they. continued to follow me wherever I went, they continued to induce harassment at work by. managers and fellow workers, and they continued to. encourage me to commit suicide. They seemed to regard my refusal to react as a crime which they would have to "put right" by. ever more. extreme forms of abuse. Finally, in. 1995, I changed tactics radically. Since late 1994 I had had accounts with internet providers in Ontario,. Canada. I discovered the cornucopia of internet newsgroups,. on every topic from consumer electronics, to. politics and legal topics, and I discovered online services such as Compuserve and AOL.. In May 1995, I made the first posting to. the conspiracy newsgroup, on the subject of "BBCs Hidden Shame". BBC's Hidden. Shame The. internet newsgroup discussion, which has now reached its fourth anniversary, started with. an article in alt.conspiracy, which I reproduce here. Date: Thu May. 4 18:27:24 1995 Newsgroups:. alt.conspiracy Subject: BBC's Hidden. Shame Remember the. two-way televisions in George Orwell's 1984? The ones which watched you back? Which you could never get rid. of, only the sound could be turned down? Well the country which brought Orwell. into the world has made his nightmare follow into the world after him. Since 1990 the British. have been waging war against one of their own citizens using surveillance. to invade privacy and a campaign of abuse in the transmitted media in. their efforts to humiliate their "victim". And the most remarkable thing about it is that what they do. is not even illegal - the UK has no laws. to protect the privacy of its citizens, nor does it proscribe harassment or abuse. except in the case of racial abuse. A lot of people in England know this to be going on,. yet so far they have maintained perfect "omerta"; not a sound, not a squeak has escaped into. the English press, and for all. the covert harassment absolutely nothing has come out into the public domain. Have the. British gone mad? I think we should be told At this point, I did not name MI5 as my persecutors. I was. still unsure that they. were the ones responsible for the "psychological terrorism". In followup posts however I did name them; and the persecutors have. never denied the. claim; so I think my guess is valid. (The Security Service Tribunal in 1997. have said "no determination in your favour was made", but it is a well established fact that MI5. lies routinely to the Tribunal which has never found in favour of a plaintiff, so. no conclusions can be drawn from. this.) This first post was made to alt.conspiracy, but further posts were. made to the UK-local newsgroups, in particular uk.misc but. also uk.legal and uk.politics (which is now called. uk.politics.misc). Some time ago I tried to take the battle. to the Compuserve forums, UKPOLITICS (which is now called UKCURRENT - current affairs), but my articles were censored. by the forum. operators. Such censorship is impossible on the internet newsgroups. Police Refuse to. Act I. have complained several times to the Metropolitan Police, who have each time. refused to help. From: Green. <Green@guidion.demon.co.uk> Newsgroups:. uk.misc,uk.politics,alt.politics.british,soc.culture.british Subject: Re: MI5 Persecution: Why Aren't the British Police Doing. Their Job? Reply-To:. Green@guidion.demon.co.uk Date: Sun Apr 7 21:13:30. 1996 In. article <DpIE0r.736.0.bloor@torfree.net> . bu765@torfree.net "Mike Corley" writes: >Last Easter (1995) I went into the. local police station in London and spoke to >an officer about the. harassment against me. But I couldn't provide tangible >evidence; what people said, in many cases years ago,. is beyond proof, and >without something to support my statements. I cannot expect a police officer to >take the complaint. seriously. This in itself dos not suggest that the. police have it in for you. The old bill operates. on extremely tight spending limits forced on them by that pillock Michael Howard, and without evidence, they. often have higher priorities than chasing something that cannot go. to court. I doubt that the police are actually being leant on,. but they probably realise that if they looked into this, they. would be leant on hard. The met always stays away from anything that looks like it has Defence, Security or secret. service interest already, because they realise that they are below these government agencies in. the general pecking. order. If I walked into my local nick and complained that MI5 were snooping. on me, they would show me the door without even looking at. my evidence, because that bored desk seargant with only five years to go before he retires doesn't want. to start fucking about with somebody who has incurred the wrath of Stella Rimington. He. would rather deal with the lost dogs and driving licence producers,. eat his cheese and pickle sandwiches and piss off home at the end of his shift. than have some high ranking spook having a go at his boss and getting. him a bollocking. In short, you have earned much sympathy but little surprise. Just remember that. saying about. the enemy of your enemies. Most recently, I wrote. in March 1999 to Charing Cross Police Station CID. They did not acknowledge. or reply to my letter. When I phoned them up, the detective Id written to treated. me to a sadly not unusual display of police bigotry, with an. uneducated rant about "your paranoid rubbish". It would be. nice to think that such uneducated bigotry is something other than wholly typical of police behaviour, but unfortunately that. is an illusion that is rapidly. dispelled. Uncorruptible. Jon Snow of Channel Four News From previous articles the reader will know what I think. Jon Snow has recently been watching me while he reads. Channel Four News in the evening. Recently I digitized a few moments. of one such broadcast, where his. face twists into a smile, without there being anything in the news broadcast to cause merriment. Here is. a usenet post from some time ago on MI5s "bought and paid for" tools in the so-called. "free" press. Peter Harding. (harding@ermine.ox.ac.uk) wrote: : I was. at speakers' corner on Sunday. There was one chap who was bellowing : about something or other, I don't know what, but. one thing he said to : someone caught. my ear: : "BBC, MI5, same. thing." Can't. disagree with that sentiment. Wasn't it. documented that MI5 sometimes "bought" journalists and broadcasters? I remember reading. a report by some jouralist who had been offered an extra tax-free income by MI5 to become. their covert mouthpiece, and had refused. ............................................................................. > : >mouthpiece,. and had refused. >. : > : It. was Jon Snow of Channel 4. > > Was it reported. in any of the papers? It has been reported several. times. The most recent was in Private Eye, a few months back. As I recall they also wanted. information from him; journalists would be. a natural choice for members of the Security Service and. the Secret Intelligence Service for information sources. > It might be. interesting to see what he had to say regarding their > attempt. to recruit him. He was most concerned that many others would have. accepted such an offer. However, we can probably make an educated. guess as to some of those who accepted:. Nigel West (Rupert Allason, MP) and Chapman Pincher would come. near to the top of the list. -- \/ David. Boothroyd. Socialist and election analyst. Omne ignotum pro magnifico. British Elections and Politics. at http://www.qmw.ac.uk/~laws/election/home.html I. wish I was in North Dakota. Next General Election must be before 22nd May '97 The House of Commons now : C 324, Lab 272, L Dem 25, UU. 9, PC 4, SDLP 4, SNP 4, UDUP 3, Ind 1, Ind UU 1, Spkrs 4. Government majority = 1.. Telephone Tate 6125. Corrupt. Security Service agents steal millions from taxpayers Money is of course a factor in the. grand equation which is the MI5 persecution.. It costs money for the Security Service to "buy" people in the media etc. But that is only a small. part of their expenditure of taxpayers resources. Most of the expenditure is directly. on the salaries if the agents involved; and. in this post I put forward the theory that MI5 are trying to draw out their involvement for as long. as possible, very cynically, to maximise their income and. line their own pockets. At each stage they have tried to. pretend that I am something out of the ordinary. Either I was very stupid ("he's an idiot") or very clever ("he's like. a genius"). Either I was. a threat to Western civilization (Levin once referred to me as the next Hitler) or I was completely defenceless ("a. soft toy"). Now, it should be obvious to any person with common-sense that I am not out of. the ordinary in any way. I have an IQ which is average for the Web, I. am racially white European, and there are plenty of other people with schizophrenia. or epilepsy out there who haven't. been targeted for MI5 attention, so why me? I think the answer is that the MI5 agents who. harass me have cynically exploited the situation by painting me as extraordinary in order to. assure themselves of well-paid employment funded by the ordinary British. taxpayer. To put it bluntly, they are stealing millions of pounds from the taxpayer to feed their own. pockets. This assertion is supported by the observation that it's the. same agents who are doing the harassment. Six months ago in a local hospital I was. harassed by someone whose face I had seen (he had stared straight at me aggressively, at the time I. just thought it was some nutter but it turns out he was one of "them") aboard. a KLM flight a couple of years ago. It's presumably been the same people most of. the time. I've seen the way contractors act when they don't want their. positions terminated. Would these agents really want to. lose their well-paid employment harassing me? Presumably they are promising their bosses a "breakthrough" (ie my demise) real-soon-now and have. been for the last seven years, while all the while. these MI5 agents skim millions off. the taxpayer. I wouldn't mind a job like that. Perhaps if I persecute myself a. little bit, like standing in front of a mirror and. shouting mindless obscenities, do you reckon I'd get a slice of the caky Service Tribunal. This. year Nick Brooks, current Tribunal Secretary, confirmed to me. that he could not think of a single case where the Tribunal. had found in favour of a complainant. Here is my usenet post. from two years ago. Subject: MI5: "It wasn't. us" Newsgroups:. uk.misc,uk.legal Organization: Toronto. Free-Net "The. Security Service Tribunal have now investigated your complaint and have asked me to inform you that no determination in your favour has been made. on your. complaint." Signed ER. Wilson, Tribunal Secretary Well that's a relief then. All that spamming. for nothing eh. Gaw blimey, if they say they're not doing it then it. can't be them, can it? In. a recent letter to Mr Brooks I expressed the opinion that the Tribunal were unable to fulfil their responsibilities in the face of. MI5 falsehoods. Nevertheless, I. do intend to make another complaint to the Tribunal in the near future, despite the. Tribunal appearing to be a toothless. watchdog. Discrimination against. a Unit Minority MI5 have been. very clear in their instructions as to what I should do. They. have openly shouted at me the word "suicide", and also from the other abuse it is clear that they want my. existence terminated. This point is covered in more. detail in a previous article. The following post describes the xenophobic nature of MI5s campaign against. me. They have refined their bigotry down. to a unit minority, yet they make use of the discrimination against the mentally ill which is a feature. of current British. society. Subject: Re: MI5 says. "Kill Yourself" Newsgroups:. uk.misc,uk.legal,uk.politics.misc,uk.media References:. <zlsiida.4248.3258FE24@fs1.mcc.ac.uk> <53eeev$cmg@axalotl.demon.co.uk> Organization: Toronto. Free-Net Distribution: iain@hotch.demon.co.uk (Iain. L M Hotchkies) wrote: >Indeed. If. you've ever had a 'conversation' with someone suffering >from florid schizophrenia,. you'll know how difficult it can be to >'argue' with. them. I don't have. florid symptoms. But I'm in a difficult situation, because those people who. don't know, aren't going to believe, and those who do, they just go along with the crowd. It's. never a good idea to go against the grain, and the grain here is defined by interests in the establishment and. the media. Even people who could say out loud what was happening won't, because then. there's a risk that they'll be. seen as traitors and ostracised. Usually this type of 'hidden abuse' is racial and. targetted at a racial minority within a country. You keep the minorities. out of the good jobs, but you don't admit discrimination exists. It happens everywhere, not. just in Britain. The persecution that is going on now is in reality a. refined form of racism. Instead of "nigger" it's "nutter", and abusing. the mentally ill is still socially. acceptable today. In 50 years it might not be, but today there isn't any social or legal sanction. against it. So really they've refined racial harassment down to a minority of one.. The words may be different, but the methods. are the same. 3937 Tag: crashed DC1 server Tag: 176296
  - 25
    - M`I 5.Pe rsecution ` M I5 Wast e Ta xpayer Million s on Pointless Hate-C ampaign MI5 Persecution Update: Friday 30 April,. 1999 If You. Intend To Reply, Please Read This Please.... keep your response to one page!. Faxes. over a page or two will be. deleted without being read. Somewhere between. 0 and 100% The last few days there have been. no clear recordable instances of abuse. However, while travelling. on the Underground, while walking around near my home and going to friends homes, I. am constantly troubled by thoughts that. those people over there might be about to get at me; that the couple sitting in the opposite seats. laughing are in fact laughing at me; et cetera, et. cetera. A. comment by a scientist to the BSE inquiry sticks in my mind. He described the. possible scale of the epidemic as "between 0% and 100%". It might not be. happening, it might not happen at all, to any discernable degree.... or. it might be total. Without clear recording, which seems to have become impossible the last. couple of weeks, there is no way of knowing whether the harassment really is continuing,. whether we have entered a temporary hiatus,. or whether perhaps it has perhaps stopped for now. But for the time being I think there arent any reasons to dicontinue. these faxes. I only re-started them six weeks ago in. response to a resumption of MI5 harassment; and I think I will need to be more convinced. of absence of persecution before I discontinue. my complaints. The Newscasters are still. watching In the last few weeks there have. been at least a couple of fairly overt instances of. "interactive watching" by newscasters. I reported this in a previous "MI5. Persecution Update". These. instances are really very rare compared to 1990-91, when there were many dozens of such occurrences. Undoubtedly the reduction is. due to my practice of videotaping everything I see. Recently I had the. opportunity of showing this. years "happenings" (Jon Snow/Nicholas Witchell) to my psychiatrist, and he agreed. that in both cases the newscasters were expressing. merriment without visible cause, and that objectively it might be possible for my claims to be true -. although of course other people reported similar thoughts to him, and this thinking. is usually a symptom of. illness. Read About the MI5 Persecution on the. World Wide Web The March. 1998 issue (number 42) of .net Magazine reviews the website describing it as an "excellent site". Since. August 11, 1996 over 50,000 people have browsed this. website. You are encouraged to read the. web pages which include a FAQ (frequently asked questions) section. outlining the nature of the persecutors, their methods of harassment through the media, people. at work and among the general. public an evidence section, which carries. audio and video clips of media and workplace harassment, rated according to how directly I think they. refer to me objective descriptions of. the state security agencies involved scanned texts of the. complaints I have made to media and state security agencies. involved posts which have been made to netnews over the last. four years on this topic Keith Hill MP (Labour - Streatham), my. elected representative, as ever refuses to. help. MI5. Waste Taxpayer Millions on Pointless Hate-Campaign Recently I was talking to. an independent observer about the nature and purpose of the perceived campaign of persecution against. me. The person I spoke to, a highly intelligent man, said he. was struck by the utter pointlessness. of the perceived campaign against me. He also said that, if my theories were. in fact true, many people would have to be involved, in the surveillance itself, and in the technical side of. the delivery of information. from my home to TV studios for example, if the "interactive watching" were happening as. described. He voiced these thoughts without any prompting from me; but both I and other observers. had arrived at pretty much. the same conclusions, some years ago. I saw a team of four men at Toronto. Airport in 1993 To carry out the surveillance alone, full-time, would. employ four or five men, or. their equivalent in terms of man-hours. Each man would "work" an eight-hour shift, so you would need at least. three men doing the surveillance, plus. a connecting link / manager. An indicator that this estimate is correct arrived in 1993, when I was accosted by. one of a group of four men at Toronto Airport; he said, laughing,. "if he tries to run away well find him". Plainly these. were the men who had been involved in the intrusive surveillance of. me for the preceding three years. On other occasions, I have seen the. same man on two or three occasions. On one such occasion, at Ottawas Civic Hospital in November 1996;. he gave his name to the doctor as "Alan Holdsworth" or some such;. my hearing is not very good sometimes and I am not sure of the. surname, although I am sure "Alan" was his first name. I saw exactly the same man again in. Ottawa, at the airport, in July 1998. Obviously, other people must. be "working" with this person; he would not be the sole agent employed in. this case. Usenet readers views on the Cost to. MI5 of Running the Campaign Here's what a couple of other people. on internet newsgroups / Usenet (uk.misc) had to say. regarding the cost of running such an operation... PO: >Have some sense, grow up and. smell reality. What you are talking about PO: >would take loads of. planning, tens of thousands of pounds and lots of PO: >people. involved in the planning, execution and maintenance of it. You PO: >must have a very high opinion of yourself to think you are worth. it. and...... PM: >But why?. And why you? Do you realize how much it would cost to keep PM: >one person under continuous surveillance. for five years? Think about PM: >all the man/hours.. Say they _just_ allocated a two man team and a PM: >supervisor. OK., Supervisor's salary, say,. #30,000 a year. Two men, PM: >#20,000 a year each. But. they'd need to work in shifts -- so it would PM: >be six men at #20,000 (which with on-costs would work. out at more like PM:. >#30,000 to the employer.) PM:. > PM: >So, we're. talking #30,000 x 6. #180,000. plus say, #40,000 for the PM: >supervisor. #220,000.. Then you've got the hardware involved. And PM: >any transcription that needs doing. You don't think the. 'Big Boss' PM: >would listen to hours and. hours of tapes, do you. PM:. > PM: >So, all in all, you couldn't actually do the job for. much less than PM: >a quarter million a year. Over. five years. What are you doing that makes PM:. >it worth the while of the state to spend over one and a quarter million PM:. >on you? Those are pretty much. the sort of calculations that went through my head once I stopped to. consider what it must be costing them to run this operation. At the very least, a quarter million a year - and. probably much more, given the intrusive and. human-resource-intensive methods employed. Times nine years. Equals well over two million pounds -. and probably. much, much more. Its wasteful for someone with my skills. to be unemployed The wastefulness of the MI5 campaign against me is not just. that of futile expenditure on their side.. It is also extremely wasteful for someone with my talents to be unemployed and on a disability. pension. I am highly qualified in numerate disciplines,. yet am unable to work, specifically because of the MI5 hate-campaign against me. It is a terrible. waste of resources for a supposedly efficient economy like that of the UK to. be squandering. the talents of a skilled and capable worker. I made every effort to remain in employment for as. long as I could, but ultimately I was. defeated by MI5s employment of massive resources specifically targeted on my workplaces with the sole aim. of seeing me evicted from those. workplaces. You might expect this sort of behaviour from the. Stasi or some other secret police force in a communist country where labour is cheap,. and the governments aim on seeing its citizens confined; but for a supposedly free and efficient. economy like Britains, the wastefulness resulting both directly and. indirectly from the Security Services activities is simply. criminal, and should never be allowed. The international dimension means the costs are. multiplied many times overoer had any sense, then they. have surely taken leave of them over the last. nine years. Four years of. persecution in Canada The persecution re-started within less than five minutes. of my arrival in Canada, as documented above,. and in the "frequently asked questions" article on the website.. The words, "if he tries to run away well find him" spoken by one of the harassers at Toronto. Airport are now imprinted on. my mind. A year later I emigrated. to Canada, intending to find a job and settle there, hoping that MI5s interest in. me might dim with time. I did manage to find. work there, but my hopes of avoiding Security Service interest were ground into dust.. As detailed above, I saw the same man in November 1996 and July 1998, both times. in Ottawa. Apart from these encounters, there were numerous incidents between 1994 and 1998. of harassment, of an identical nature and. in most cases using identical words to what had occurred in the. UK. It became quite clear to me that the permanent surveillance and. harassment operation which MI5 had subjected me to in England. was being continued. For a team of four or. five men to be employed overseas must cost a lot more than if they operate in their home country. And for MI5 to. continue the operation for a period of. over four years, continuously, must cost many hundreds of thousands of pounds. This confirms my belief. that the state is funding the campaign against mehat the Security Service. receives current annual funding of #160M. Divided by 1850 staff, works. out at #86,000. But the unit annual cost of each. "watcher" must be much higher than this, especially given the frequently mobile. and overseas nature of their actions of the last few years. A very conservative figure. might be a little over #100,000 pa for each of a team. of five people, or half a million pounds per year. For nine years, so. far. So the most conservative estimate of the surveillance element alone is. perhaps four or five million pounds since. 1990. This guesstimate is of course theoretical - I am not privy. to inside details of how MI5 split their funding. But to take some other. examples, the cost of. a US counter-surveillance specialist per day is USD 5,000. Even. if the agents permanently assigned to me are not of this calibre - even. if they employ specialists when difficult work planting bugs etc is encountered - their salary and support costs must still. be very high. The individual agents. are doing well for themselves as they are well-paid to exercise psychopathic instincts which in any sane. society would see them in prison; but the taxpayers who must fund. this terribly wasteful exercise are being "done". out of hundreds of thousands of pounds each. year. It must be. emphasised that the above estimates are highly conservative. Besides the surveillance operation, it must. carry a high cost in man-hours to propagate covert. slanders through the population; to setup and maintain the "interactive watching" links. to TV and radio stations, which. these organisations continue desparately to "lie and deny";. and to induce antipathy in co-workers which would not otherwise exist. Why they are wasting. Millions of Pounds on a "Nobody from South London" As remarked in the prologue to this article, it is really. most extraordinary that the Security. Service spends a chunk of its budget, every year for nine years so far, on a meaningless campaign. against a "nobody from South London". That they are spending. such a large amount of money has been confirmed to. me on several occasions, usually by oblique references to. "its costing this country millions". The supposed "logic" behind the persecution is that MI5 wish to avoid their. harassment of me, and the involvement of the UK. media, to be made public; yet as the reader will appreciate that is a circular argument, "theyre. doing it because they want to keep it secret and avoid. humiliation for themselves and their country" begs the question, "why did they start doing it in. the first place?", to which in truth I myself do not know the. answer. Plainly MI5 with its rich budget can. afford half a million pounds a year to waste on. a "nobody from South London". Some time ago I was talking to a British. surveillance professional on Compuserve who told me "this work costs a. lot of money and is usally because the person I am following has done. something (usually criminal) to warrant all this money and time being spent." Yet in this particular case it is plainly not. the "victims fault". that the harassment is taking place. The hate-campaign against me is completely the creation of the obsessive psychologies of the. MI5 agents who have made themselves my persecutors;. it is obviously a "personal" campaign for them, and for. years they misuse taxpayer funding to feed their insane, unnatural and. fixated fantasies. 2467 Tag: crashed DC1 server Tag: 176295

Hi,

Murphy rules again. An old Windows 2003 server was the first DC in the AD.
It was schema master, etc. The new server arrived this week but... the old
one quit yesterday with a repeated STOP 0x0000007B error. I cannot get it
back up, I cannot even access the disks using a tool like BartPE.

There is a Windows 2003 DC2 server in the same domain that I want to give
all FSMO's. Doing that it rather straight forward as far as I know, but... I
still need to delete the crashed DC1 from the domain. Which KB describes all
the steps? I cannot find it?

Bonno Bloksma

Top

Re: crashed DC1 server by Meinolf

Meinolf
Fri Feb 01 09:48:46 PST 2008

Hello Bonno,

Remove the old crashed DC:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/555846/en-us

How to seize the 5 FSMO roles (Sroll down to SEIZE roles):
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/255504/en-us

Also you have to make the running DC Global catalog server and DNS serv