M,I`5,Persec ution why w on't t he Britis h p olice do th eir job an d p ut a st op to it ?
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
-= why won't the British police do. their job and put a stop to it? -=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
The British police obviously. do know what is taking place. Besides my
interpretations. of what individual officers have said which forces that
conclusion, it would be inconceivable for them to be. unaware of something
on this. scale.
If they know, then they will know that the. abusers have broken laws in the
UK and. abroad. Recently the UK introduced laws against electronic spying
which carry a penalty. of several years jail if caught. If the police know
illegal harassment is taking. place, and do nothing about it, then they are
failing in. their responsibilities.
Last Easter (1995) I went into the local police station in. London and spoke
to an officer about the harassment. against me. But I couldn't provide
tangible evidence; what people said, in many cases years ago,. is beyond
proof, and without something to support. my statements I cannot expect a
police officer. to take the complaint seriously.
The current situation with regard to the. police is not one which allows a
breakthrough in dealing with the. problem. On the one hand, most individual
officers at a local police station may not know. about the ongoing assaults,
so a. complaint at that level will not yield results. Yet the police as an
organisation do know of the harassment, and. they must be aware that a
complaint has. been made at a police station. So it is clearly their duty to
take. preventative action against the continuing molestation, but because
the criminals. are operating on behalf of a state agency, the police are not
carrying out. their duty.
1747 Tag: M'I`5'Perse cution wh y wo n't th e B ritish p olice do the ir job a nd put a st op to it? Tag: 176334
M,I`5 Persecutio n ' Bern ard Le vin expr esses hi s v iews
The article of which part is reproduced below was penned. by Bernard Levin
for the Features. section of the Times on 21 September 1991. To my mind, it
described the situation at the time and in. particular a recent meeting with
a. friend, during which I for the first time admitted to someone other than
my GP that I had been subjected to. a conspiracy of harassment over the
previous year and. a half.
>There is a madman. running loose about London, called David Campbell; I have
>no reason to believe that. he is violent, but he should certainly be
>approached with caution. You may know. him by the curious glitter in his
>eyes and a persistent trembling of his hands; if. that does not suffice, you
>will find him attempting to thrust no. fewer than 48 books into your arms,
>all. hardbacks, with a promise that, if you should return to the same
>meeting-place next year, he will heave another 80. at you.
>
>If, by now, the police have arrived and are keeping a close watch. on him,
>you may feel sufficiently emboldened to examine the books.. The jackets are
>a model of uncluttered typography, elegantly and simply laid out;. there is
>an unobtrusive colophon of a rising sun, probably not picked. at random.
>Gaining confidence - the lunatic is smiling by now, and the. policemen, who
>know about. such things, have significantly removed their helmets - you
>could do worse than take the jacket off the first book. in the pile. The
>only word. possible to describe the binding is sumptuous; real cloth in a
>glorious shade of dark green, with the. title and author in black and gold
>on the. spine.
>
>Look at it more closely; your eyes do not deceive you -. it truly does have
>real top-bands. and tail-bands, in yellow, and, for good measure, a silk
>marker ribbon in a. lighter green. The paper is cream-wove and acid-free,
>and the book is sewn, not. glued.
>
>Throughout the encounter, I should have mentioned,. our loony has been
>chattering away, although what he is trying to say is. almost impossible to
>understand;. after a time, however, he becomes sufficiently coherent to make
>clear that he is trying to sell the books to. you. Well, now, such quality
>in bookmaking today can only be for collectors' limited editions. at a
>fearsome price -. #30, #40, #50?
>
>No,. no, he says, the glitter more powerful than ever and the trembling of
>his hands rapidly spreading throughout his entire body; no, no - the. books
>are priced variously at #7, #8 or #9, with. the top price #12.
>
>At this, the. policemen understandably put their helmets back on; one of
>them draws his truncheon and the other. can be heard summoning
>reinforcements on his walkie-talkie. The madman bursts into tears,. and
>swears. it is all true.
>
>And it. is.
>
>David Campbell has acquired the entire rights. to the whole of the
>Everyman's Library, which died a lingering and shameful. death a decade or
>so ago, and he proposes. to start it all over again - 48 volumes this
>September and 80 more next year, in editions I have. described, at the
>prices specified. He proposes to. launch his amazing venture simultaneously
>in Britain and the United States,. with the massive firepower of Random
>Century at his back in. this country, and the dashing cavalry of Knopf
>across the water, and no one. who loves literature and courage will forbear
>to. cheer.
At the time this article was. written I had believed for some time that
columnists in the Times and other. journalists had been making references to
my situation. Nothing unusual about. this you may think, plenty of people
have the same sort of ideas and obviously the papers aren't. writing about
them, so. why should my beliefs not be as false as those of others?
What makes this article so extraordinary is. that three or four days
immediately preceding its publication,. I had a meeting with a friend,
during the course of which. we discussed the media persecution, and in
particular. that by Times columnists. It seemed to me, reading the article
by Levin in Saturday?s paper, that he was describing. in some detail his
"artist?s impression" of that. meeting. Most telling are the final
sentences, when he writes, "The madman bursts into tears, and swears. it is
all true. And it is." Although I did not "burst into tears" (he seems. to be
using. a bit of poetic licence and exaggerating) I did try hard to convince
my. friend that it was all true; and I am able to concur with Mr Levin,
because, of course,. it is.
At the beginning of the piece. Levin reveals a fear of being attacked by the
"irrational" subject of his story,. saying "I have no reason to believe that
he is violent, but he should certainly. be approached with caution". This
goes back to. the xenophobic propaganda of "defence" against a "threat"
which was seen at the very beginning of the harassment.. The impression of a
"madman running loose" who needs to be controlled through an. agency which
assigns to. itself the mantle of the "police" is also one which had been
expressed. elsewhere.
In the. final paragraph of this extract, his reference to Everyman?s Library
as having "died a lingering and shameful death a decade. or so ago" shows
clearly what sort of conclusion they. wish to their campaign. They want a
permanent solution, and as they. are prevented from achieving that solution
directly, they waste. significant resources on methods which have been
repeatedly. shown to be ineffective for such a purpose.
1747 Tag: M'I`5'Perse cution wh y wo n't th e B ritish p olice do the ir job a nd put a st op to it? Tag: 176333
M,I-5'P ersecution Berna rd Levi n expre sses h is views
The article of which part is reproduced below was penned by Bernard. Levin
for the Features section of the Times on 21. September 1991. To my mind, it
described the situation at the time. and in particular a recent meeting with
a friend, during which I. for the first time admitted to someone other than
my GP that I had been subjected to a conspiracy of. harassment over the
previous. year and a half.
>There is a madman running loose. about London, called David Campbell; I have
>no reason to believe that he is. violent, but he should certainly be
>approached with caution. You may know him by. the curious glitter in his
>eyes and a. persistent trembling of his hands; if that does not suffice, you
>will find him attempting to thrust no. fewer than 48 books into your arms,
>all hardbacks, with. a promise that, if you should return to the same
>meeting-place next year, he will heave. another 80 at you.
>
>If, by now, the police have arrived and are. keeping a close watch on him,
>you. may feel sufficiently emboldened to examine the books. The jackets are
>a model of uncluttered typography, elegantly and simply laid out;. there is
>an unobtrusive colophon of a rising. sun, probably not picked at random.
>Gaining confidence - the lunatic is smiling by now,. and the policemen, who
>know about such things, have significantly removed their. helmets - you
>could do worse than take the jacket off the first book. in the pile. The
>only word possible to describe the binding is sumptuous; real cloth in. a
>glorious shade of dark green, with the title and. author in black and gold
>on the. spine.
>
>Look at it more closely; your eyes. do not deceive you - it truly does have
>real top-bands and tail-bands, in yellow,. and, for good measure, a silk
>marker ribbon in a lighter green. The paper is cream-wove. and acid-free,
>and the book is sewn, not. glued.
>
>Throughout. the encounter, I should have mentioned, our loony has been
>chattering away, although what he is trying to say is almost impossible. to
>understand; after a. time, however, he becomes sufficiently coherent to make
>clear that he is trying to. sell the books to you. Well, now, such quality
>in bookmaking today. can only be for collectors' limited editions at a
>fearsome price -. #30, #40, #50?
>
>No, no, he says, the glitter more powerful than ever and. the trembling of
>his hands rapidly spreading throughout his entire body; no, no. - the books
>are priced variously. at #7, #8 or #9, with the top price #12.
>
>At this, the policemen. understandably put their helmets back on; one of
>them draws his truncheon and the other. can be heard summoning
>reinforcements on his walkie-talkie. The madman bursts. into tears, and
>swears it is. all true.
>
>And it. is.
>
>David Campbell has acquired. the entire rights to the whole of the
>Everyman's Library, which died a lingering. and shameful death a decade or
>so ago, and he proposes. to start it all over again - 48 volumes this
>September and 80 more next year, in editions. I have described, at the
>prices specified. He proposes to. launch his amazing venture simultaneously
>in Britain and the United States,. with the massive firepower of Random
>Century at his. back in this country, and the dashing cavalry of Knopf
>across the water, and no one who loves. literature and courage will forbear
>to. cheer.
At the. time this article was written I had believed for some time that
columnists in the Times and other journalists. had been making references to
my situation. Nothing unusual about this you may think, plenty. of people
have the same sort of ideas and obviously the. papers aren't writing about
them, so why should my beliefs. not be as false as those of others?
What makes this article so extraordinary is. that three or four days
immediately preceding its publication, I had. a meeting with a friend,
during the course of which we discussed the media. persecution, and in
particular that by Times. columnists. It seemed to me, reading the article
by Levin in Saturday?s paper, that he. was describing in some detail his
"artist?s impression". of that meeting. Most telling are the final
sentences,. when he writes, "The madman bursts into tears, and swears it is
all true. And. it is." Although I did not "burst into tears" (he seems to be
using a bit. of poetic licence and exaggerating) I did try hard to convince
my friend that it was all true; and I am able to concur with Mr. Levin,
because,. of course, it is.
At the. beginning of the piece Levin reveals a fear of being attacked by the
"irrational" subject of. his story, saying "I have no reason to believe that
he is violent, but he should certainly be. approached with caution". This
goes back to the xenophobic propaganda of "defence" against. a "threat"
which was seen. at the very beginning of the harassment. The impression of a
"madman running loose" who needs to be controlled. through an agency which
assigns to itself. the mantle of the "police" is also one which had been
expressed. elsewhere.
In the final paragraph. of this extract, his reference to Everyman?s Library
as having "died a lingering and shameful death a decade or. so ago" shows
clearly what sort of. conclusion they wish to their campaign. They want a
permanent. solution, and as they are prevented from achieving that solution
directly, they. waste significant resources on methods which have been
repeatedly shown to. be ineffective for such a purpose.
6607 Tag: M'I`5'Perse cution wh y wo n't th e B ritish p olice do the ir job a nd put a st op to it? Tag: 176332
M`I,5.Pe rsecution - who knows abo ut i t?
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
-= who knows about it?. =-
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Many people know, both in the establishment and media, and. among the
general public. Despite an absence. of its target from the UK for more than
two years, the echoes of paranoia can still be heard loud and clear. from
across the water. When it started in 1990,. the only people who knew were
those in BBC television who. were spying on my home, and a few radio
broadcasters. There were a few cases. of public harassment, but very little
compared. to the situation that developed a couple of years later.
The list today. includes BBC TV staff (newsreaders such as Martyn Lewis,
Michael. Buerk, Nicholas Witchell), people from radio stations such as
Chris Tarrant of Capital and Radio 1 DJs, people in the print media,. but
also. many people in the general public. All united in a conspiracy which
breaks the laws which the UK does. have regarding harassment, and all
completely uncaring. for any semblance of decency or elementary respect
for individual. rights.
The British police (obviously) do know the nature of. the harassment and in
all probability the identity of those. behind it. Some time ago I made a
complaint to my local police station in. London, without positive result.
The UK police are failing in their duty to see the law enforced in. not
checking. the abuse.
4177 Tag: M'I`5'Perse cution wh y wo n't th e B ritish p olice do the ir job a nd put a st op to it? Tag: 176331
M'I.5,Persecu tion , h ow a nd wh y did it start ?
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
-= how and why did. it start? -=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
The harassment didn't start by itself, so someone must. have been there at
the outset to give it a firm push and set the "animals" after. me. It looks
as. if I was set up in June 1990, and the timing indicates someone from
university was. responsible.
>One thing which. has been missing from this discussion is this simple
>prognosis: that maybe he is right. and that, despite his admitted
>mental condition, there really is a campaign. against him organised by
>now-influential ex-students of his. university.
In May or. June 1990, Alan Freeman on Radio 1 read out a letter from someone
who had known me for a. few years, who wrote of the one who "wore out his
welcome with random. precision" (from the Pink Floyd song). Freeman went on
to say to the writer "that's a hell of a letter you wrote there".. The
indication is strongly that people I had parted from. soon before nursed a
grudge against me and were trying. to cause trouble for me.
The suggestion is. that Freeman might have shown the letter to other people,
and things could have. snowballed from there. Right from the start the real
source (security services presumed) didn't. announce themselves as the
origin, but let the "talkers", the radio DJs, believe that. they were the
originators. Think about it; if you announce, "we're MI5 and we. have a
campaign against this bloke" then people might not go along with. it; but if
you say, "everyone else is. getting at this bloke because he 'deserves' it"
then. people will join in with fewer qualms.
>Why would "they" wish. to assassinate your character?
It's the classic case of hitting a cripple to prove you're stronger.. Why
would the security services expend hundreds of thousands of. pounds and more
than six years of manpower to try to kill. a British citizen? Because they
are motivated by people who knew me. at university and feel personal
animosity; because they knew me. to be emotionally weak, and it is in the
nature of bullies to prey. on those known to be weak; and because they can
rely on the complicity of the establishment, which. the security services
manipulate and. derive funding from. This is England's biggest humiliation
today, and. the British security services are intent on preventing their
humiliation becoming reality by continuing. their campaign of attempted
murder. to suppress the truth from becoming public.
1747 Tag: M'I`5'Perse cution wh y wo n't th e B ritish p olice do the ir job a nd put a st op to it? Tag: 176330
M.I'5`P ersecution . cost of th e op eration
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=. MI5: cost of the operation -=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Here's what a couple of other people on. Usenet (uk.misc) had to say
regarding the. cost of running such an operation...
PO:. >Have some sense, grow up and smell reality. What you are talking about
PO: >would take loads of planning, tens of thousands of. pounds and lots of
PO: >people involved in the planning, execution and maintenance. of it. You
PO: >must have a very high opinion of yourself. to think you are worth it.
PM: >But why? And why you? Do you realize how much it. would cost to keep
PM: >one person. under continuous surveillance for five years? Think about
PM: >all the man/hours. Say they _just_ allocated a two. man team and a
PM:. >supervisor. OK., Supervisor's salary, say, #30,000 a year. Two men,
PM: >#20,000 a year each. But they'd need to work in. shifts -- so it would
PM: >be six men at #20,000 (which with on-costs would work. out at more like
PM: >#30,000. to the employer.)
PM:. >
PM: >So, we're talking #30,000 x 6. #180,000. plus say,. #40,000 for the
PM: >supervisor. #220,000.. Then you've got the hardware involved. And
PM: >any transcription that needs doing.. You don't think the 'Big Boss'
PM: >would listen to hours and hours. of tapes, do you.
PM:. >
PM: >So, all in all, you couldn't actually do the job for much. less than
PM: >a quarter million. a year. Over five years. What are you doing that makes
PM: >it worth the while of the state to. spend over one and a quarter million
PM: >on. you?
Those are pretty. much the sort of calculations that went through my head
once I stopped to consider what. it must be costing them to run this
operation. The partial answer is, there have been periods. when the
intensity has been greater, and times when. little has happened. In fact,
for much of 1993 and. the first half of 1994, very little happened. Although
I. don't think that was for reasons of money - if they can tap into the
taxpayer they're not going to. be short of resources, are they?
The more complete answer is in the enormity of what. they're doing. Relative
to the cost to British pride of. seeing their country humiliated for the
persecution of their own citizens, isn't is worth the cost of four or. five
people to try. to bring things to a close in the manner they would wish? To
the government. a million or two is quite honestly nothing - if they can
convince themselves of the necessity. of what they're doing, resources will
not be the limiting. factor.
9037 Tag: M'I`5'Perse cution wh y wo n't th e B ritish p olice do the ir job a nd put a st op to it? Tag: 176329
M I-5 Persec ution , Capit al Radi o - Ch ris Tarra nt
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=
-= Capital Radio - Chris. Tarrant -=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=
Capital Radio DJs have been "in on it". from the start. One of the first
things I heard in the summer of 1990 was from a Capital DJ. who said, "If
he listens to Capital then he can't be all. bad" (supportive, you see. We're
not bastards). Much of what came over the radio in 1990 is now. so far away
the. precise details have been obliterated by time. No diary was kept of the
details,. and although archives if they exist may give pointers, the
ambiguity of what broadcasters said would. leave that open to
re-interpretation.
In spring 1994, Chris Tarrant on his Capital morning show made. an aside to
someone else in the studio, about. a person he didn't identify. He said,
"You. know this bloke? He says we're trying to kill him. We should be done
for attempted. manslaughter".
That mirrored. something I had said a day or two before. What Tarrant said
was understood by the staff member in the studio he. was saying it to; they
said, "Oh no, don't say that" to Tarrant. If any archives exist of. the
morning show (probably unlikely) then it could be. found there; what he said
was so out of context that he would be. very hard put to find an explanation.
A couple of days later, someone. at the site where I was working repeated the
remark although in a different way; they said there had been people. in a
computer room when automatic fire extinguishers went off. and those people
were "thinking of suing for. attempted manslaughter".
Finally, this isn't confined to the. established radio stations. In 1990
after I had listened to a pirate radio station in South. London for about
half an hour, there was an audible phone call in the background,. followed
by total silence for a few moments, then shrieks of laughter. "So. what are
we supposed to say. now? Deadly torture? He's going to talk to us now, isn't
he?",. which meant that they could hear what I would say in my room.
6607 Tag: M'I`5'Perse cution wh y wo n't th e B ritish p olice do the ir job a nd put a st op to it? Tag: 176327
M`I 5.Persecution . bu gging a nd counter-surveill ance
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
-= MI5: bugging and. counter-surveillance -=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
PO: >Did. you ever look for the bugs in your house ? If not, why not ? I mean if
PO: >I thought that was happening to me,. I'd search the place from top to bottom,
PO: >I mean I live there. I would know if anything was out of place. If I was
PO: >really suspicious, I would call in one of those bug detection. teams which
PO: >have those machines. that pick up the transmitted radio waves. This
PO: >reminds me of BUGS,. that new programme on BBC1 on
That's exactly. what we did. We went to a competent, professional detective
agency in London,. paid them over 400 quid to debug our house. They used
scanner. devices which go to over 1 GHz and would pick up any nearby
transmitter in that range, they. also checked the phones and found
nothing... but if the. tap was at the exchange, then they wouldn't find
anything,. would they?
CS:. >Doesn't this suggest to you that there are, in fact, no bugs to be found?
You can assume. that they've done this sort of thing to other people in more
"serious" cases, where they would know. the targets would suspect the
presence of electronic surveillance. So they. will have developed techniques
and devices which are not readily detectable either. by visual inspection or
by. electronic means. What those techniques might be, I couldn't guess.
In this case, the existence. of bugging devices was clear from the
beginning, and they "rubbed it in" with what was. said by the boy on the
coach. It was almost as if they wanted counter-surveillance people. to be
called in, who. they knew would fail to detect the bugging devices, causing
loss of credibility to the other. things I would have to say relating to the
harassment.
I did all. the things someone in my situation would do to try to find the
bugs. In addition. to calling in professional help using electronic
counter-surveillance, I made. a close visual inspection of electrical
equipment, plus any points where audio. or video surveillance devices might
have. been concealed. Of course, I found nothing. Normal surveillance
"mini-cameras" are. quite noticeable and require visible supporting
circuitry. It seems to. me the best place to put a small video surveillance
device would be additional to a piece of electronic equipment such as a. TV
or video. It would be necessary to physically break in to a property. to fit
such a. device.
4177 Tag: M'I`5'Perse cution wh y wo n't th e B ritish p olice do the ir job a nd put a st op to it? Tag: 176326
M'I.5,Persecution ' th e BBC, telev ision and r adio
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=
-= the. BBC, television and radio -=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=
The first incident in June 1990 was when a BBC newsreader made what. seemed
to be a reaction to something which had. happened in my home, and out of
context. of what they were reading. My first reaction was disbelief; nothing
of the sort had ever happened before, the idea that such a. thing could
occur had not. crossed my mind, yet there was no doubt of what had just
taken place. My. disbelief eroded as this recurred time after time. Besides
the news, offenders included shows such as. Crimewatch (!), Newsnight, and
"entertainment" shows. There seems to be very. little moral understanding
among the people who make these. programmes; they just assume they will
never be caught, so. they carry on without a thought for the illegality or
amorality of what they do. The only time I. ever heard a word raised in
doubt was by Paxman being interviewed by someone. else (I think by Clive
Anderson) back in 1990; referring to. the "watching" he said it troubled
him, and. when asked by the host what you could do about it, replied "Well,
you. could just switch it off" (meaning the surveillance monitor in the
studio). He clearly didn't let his doubts stand in the way of. continued
surreptitious spying from his own or other people's shows,. though.
Now you're convinced this. is a troll, aren't you? This story has been the
subject of much debate on the uk.* Usenet newsgroups for over a year,. and
some readers believe it to be an invention (it has even been. suggested that
a. group of psychology students are responsible!), others think it
symptomatic of. a derangement of the author, and a few give it credence.
Quite. a few people do know part or all of the story already, so this text
will fill in the gaps in. their knowledge. For the rest, what may persuade
you of the third possibility. is that some of the incidents detailed are
checkable against any archives. of radio and TV programmes that exist; that
the incidents involve named people. (even if those hiding in the shadows
have not. made their identity or affiliations evident), and those people
may be persuaded to come out with. the truth; and that the campaign of
harassment is continuing today both in the UK and on. the American
continent, in a. none-too-secret fashion; by its nature the significant risk
of exposure increases with. time.
On several occasions people said to my face that. harassment from the TV was
happening. On the first. day I worked in Oxford, I spent the evening in the
local pub with the company's. technical director Ian, and Phil, another
employee. Ian made a few references to me and said to. Phil, as if in an
aside, "Is he the bloke who's been on TV?" to which. Phil replied, "Yes, I
think. so".
I made a number of efforts to find the bugs, without. success; last year we
employed professional counter-surveillance people. to scan for bugs (see
later) again without result. In autumn. 1990 I disposed of my TV and watched
virtually. no television for the next three years. But harassment from TV
stations. has gone on for over six years and continues to this day. This is
something that many people. obviously know is happening; yet the TV staff
have. the morality of paedophiles, that because they're getting away with it
they feel no. wrong.
Other people who were involved in the abuse in. 1990 were DJs on BBC radio
stations, notably disc jockeys from Radio 1 and other stations. (see the
following section).. Again, since they don't have sense in the first place
they can't be expect to have the moral sense not to be. part of criminal
harassment.
1747 Tag: M'I`5'Perse cution wh y wo n't th e B ritish p olice do the ir job a nd put a st op to it? Tag: 176325
how to remove nt4 pdc from Win2000 AD?
dear all,
i've a Win2000 AD built up 2 years ago and the nt4 pdc is still left
inside the AD under "Active Directory Users and Computers" --> "Domain
Controllers". i want to delete it from the AD, however, i got an
error saying "DSA object cannot be deleted." how can i clean this up?
thx in advance!!! and happy new year to u all!!!
regards,
LM Tag: M'I`5'Perse cution wh y wo n't th e B ritish p olice do the ir job a nd put a st op to it? Tag: 176313
Removing an old user from Active Directory?
Is there anything special that needs to be done when removing a user from
Active Directory Users and Computers? Remove seems too simple. I am sure
there will be "junk" lying about. Thanks. Oh Windows 2000 SP 4 Advanced
Server.
--
George Hester
_________________________________ Tag: M'I`5'Perse cution wh y wo n't th e B ritish p olice do the ir job a nd put a st op to it? Tag: 176307
Help!
I just inatalled Microsoft Virtual PC 2007 on my laptop and i made a new
virtual disk and it wont boot! it keeps saying " Reboot and select proper
boot device or insert boot media in selected boot device" What do i do?? Tag: M'I`5'Perse cution wh y wo n't th e B ritish p olice do the ir job a nd put a st op to it? Tag: 176304
big problem with active directory
I made a mistake and now don't have any user without active directory
restrictions
the problem is that i have the Adminstrator password, but the desktop is
like the same desktop of all the other users, is there any way to undo this,
or to somehow enter de users and move the administrator back to a folder
without restrictions.
Please i need help Tag: M'I`5'Perse cution wh y wo n't th e B ritish p olice do the ir job a nd put a st op to it? Tag: 176302
External Associated Account
Greetings All,
I am in a bit of a jam, I am new to scripting and I am trying to figure out
how I can script the "Associated External Account" in Exchange to a account
in a trusted domain and not the usual "SELF" account. Ideally the script
would call a input file such as a txt file or csv since I am trying to
perform a batch modify of about 500 users at a time. I have found several
articles and scripts that perform the function individually but not a batch
method. I am having trouble trying to tie it in with a input file, I am a
newbie when it comes to scripting so bear with me. Any help or direction
would be kindly appreciated. Thank you.
Vid Tag: M'I`5'Perse cution wh y wo n't th e B ritish p olice do the ir job a nd put a st op to it? Tag: 176301
External Associated Account
Greetings All,
I am in a bit of a jam, I am new to scripting and I am trying to figure out
how I can script the "Associated External Account" in Exchange to a account
in a trusted domain and not the usual "SELF" account. Ideally the script
would call a input file such as a txt file or csv since I am trying to
perform a batch modify of about 500 users at a time. I have found several
articles and scripts that perform the function individually but not a batch
method. I am having trouble trying to tie it in with a input file, I am a
newbie when it comes to scripting so bear with me. Any help or direction
would be kindly appreciated. Thank you.
Vid Tag: M'I`5'Perse cution wh y wo n't th e B ritish p olice do the ir job a nd put a st op to it? Tag: 176300
M'I.5,Per secution , BB C N ewscasters Li e & Deny The yre Wa tching Me
MI5 Persecution: BBC Newscasters. Lie & Deny They're Watching Me
Central to the persecution campaign waged against me. for some nine years
now by. the Security Service is their use of the media, and in particular
the broadcast media, to make clear to me that I am. under surveillance and
being watched within my own home, even. by BBC newscasters while they read
the news. This is really an act of arrogance; MI5. and their tools in the
television and radio are so sure. that they can never be caught, that they
have many. times made explicity clear on broadcast programmes that they are
as capable of. seeing me as I am of seeing the broadcast pictures. Even
when they have known I am taping the programmes. they still carry on this
practice; for examples. of TVand radio presenters caught "in action", see
the Evidence area of my. website.
If you wish. to reply to this article......
then please include your name and fax number! I provide the means. for
recipients. to send me their thoughts on the topics discussed, but ask that
you. provide me with your fax number or email address if you require a
response. Also would you please send not more than one or. two pages, if by
fax.. Thank-you!
It. started with a Newscaster, and it continues with Newscasters today
The very first. incident in the story started with a reaction by an ITN
newscaster, Sue Carpenter, in June of 1990, almost nine years ago. now. She
reacted to what she. saw in my living room at home as she read the news. My
mother. had brought an apple for me into the room, whereupon the newsreader
smirked and giggled, apparently finding this funny. I. couldn't believe
what I was seeing. I. carried on watching news and other television
programmes to see if presenters would. show signs of "interactive
watching"; to my surprise, this happened again and again.. Unfortunately, I
did not have my wits sufficiently about me to videotape these. programmes,
and it is. now almost impossible to obtain recordings dating back to 1990.
However, I have. been busy recording everything Ive watched the last couple
of years, and the taping has yielded some nuggets, which you will. find if
you. point your Web browser at the "evidence" area of my website, whose URL
address is given above. Strangely it is. not particularly the BBC who are
"after me" at the moment (with the. exception of occasional fire from
Nicholas. Witchell), but that supposed paragon of virtue and decency Jon
Snow. of Channel Four TV News (he actually works for ITN), who once claimed
hed turned down MI5s offer of a tax-free salary. I will cover. Snows recent
actions in a future. article.
BBCs. Hidden Shame
The first ever Usenet post (internet newsgroup article) on. the subject of
the MI5 bugging / BBC watching occurred,. as stated in a previous article,
in early May 1995. It. is reproduced here;
Date: Thu May. 4 18:27:24 1995
Newsgroups:. alt.conspiracy
Subject: BBC's Hidden. Shame
Remember the two-way televisions in George. Orwell's 1984? The ones which
watched you back? Which you could never get. rid of, only the sound could
be turned. down?
Well. the country which brought Orwell into the world has made his
nightmare follow into the world after him. Since 1990. the British have
been waging war against one of their own citizens. using surveillance to
invade privacy and a campaign of abuse in the transmitted. media in their
efforts to humiliate. their "victim".
I suppose "BBCs Hidden Shame" is more. of a wish than a fact. It may be
hidden, but the BBC and other media and security organisations seem. to
have no shame whatever in their. anti-social, not to say criminal,
actions. Nor do. the general public, who seem quite happy to parrot the
vilest. obscenities without much hesitation or apparently thought.
Martyn Lewis, Nicholas Witchell and. the rest
Most of the harassment occurred in 1990-92, when I. wasnt making any
recordings, and the BBC wont. release copies of current affairs programmes
from that. period.... so although I can remember there were many incidents
in that. time, even many specifics, I cant dig up the actual programmes to
flesh. out the bones.
This year, there. has been at least one incident with Nicholas Witchell as
newsreader, which I have. successfully recorded and digitized,
i.e. converted into a computer Quicktime movie file.. This has not yet
found its way onto my website (Im a busy man, dontcha. know) but you can be
sure I will let. the readership of these articles know when that clip makes
it onto the web.. The Witchell clip was recorded on Saturday 10 April 1999
at. 7pm, and shows Witchell trying to restrain his features from collapsing
into a smirk. First his upper lip quivers for several. minutes, then with
the non-excuse of a non-joke. his entire face twists into a grin. It looks
as if he finds me so funny, that he allows. himself to submerge any
pretence at professionalism in a sea of MI5-inspired. sarcasm and
harassment.
The two. BBC newscasters whose reactions to me I can remember most vividly
over the years. are Martyn Lewis and Nicholas Witchell. I can remember
thinking. years ago that Michael Buerk was also seeing me at home; and if
the other two are watching then there. would be no reason why he wouldnt be
doing the same; but in all honesty I cannot remember. a single clear
instance of his. reacting through facial or verbal expression to me.
I can remember several instances of Martyn Lewis. reacting to what he saw
of me, however. In early 1992 I was watching the BBC news with Lewis. on a
small black-and-white portable TV at my. then home in Oxford. I threw a
term of abuse. at Lewis; he flinched, then gave a grin and made a comment
from which I. understood that he had been on my side, but might have
changed his mind as a. result of what Id just said to him.
And in spring 1991 I remember Martyn Lewis clearly. reacting to what he saw
of me at my then accommodation in. Woking, Surrey, by continuing to stare
at some fixed point near the camera after. the news had finished -
presumably this is where the monitor interactively showing pictures. of my
room was. located.
Why would BBC and other Newscasters Watch and Harass Me,. Watching Them?
This is a very difficult question,. and I dont actually know the answer. It
is a matter of record that the Secret Services are very. much part of the
Establishment. The recent exposure of the "MI6 Agent List" on. the
internet, and its coverage in the newspapers, reveals how much MI5. and MI6
are recruited from the. ranks of the Establishment. Obviously the
relationship is bi-directional; the Establishment influences MI5/MI6,. but
the secret services (well, perhaps not so secret now we know who works. for
MI6!!!) also influence. the machinery of power and information
dissemination i.e. media in this country. So they. must have a lot of
covert leverage with the BBC. and ITN.
Some of this leverage is obviously through bribery. It is. a matter of
record that MI5 tried some years ago to "buy". Jon Snow of Channel Four
TV. He turned them down - obviously they. must have approached other media
people as well, and from the lack of other reports of people turning. them
down, it may be presumed that some. other journalists will have accepted
the sugared carrots. put before them. Ironically, Jon Snow has been taking
part in the. recent "watching" actions against me - but why he has allowed
himself to be used by the secret services is something which I do. not
know.
Perhaps the Security Service uses blackmail to twist. arms of journalists
into co-operating with them? I have always thought there. was something
slightly odd about Martyn. Lewiss demeanour. At the time of the Ron Davies
"rough trade" scandal it was. reported that MI5 had known all about Davies
predilections and the sham of. his pretence to be a happily married
man. Perhaps MI5. have been able to dig something up from Martyn Lewiss
private life to blackmail. him into acting on their behalf? And if there
wasnt anything before the. "newscaster watching" started then there most
certainly is. something now.... once theyve started watching, the
newscasters will surely. wish their activities to remain covered-up, and
co-operate with the security. service.
"Newscaster Watching" Deliberately. Constructed to Mimic Schizophrenia
Presumably this. is the first case in history of television journalists
actually taking part in acts. of real-time, live spying and reacting
against one of their viewers. What you have. to understand, though, is that
I was quite mentally healthy in June 1990, certainly relative. to November
1992, when after two and a half. years of harassment I was finally admitted
to hospital as an out-patient. MI5 decided. from the outset that they would
make me mad;. they constructed the media harassment to resemble what would
be. reported by a person with mental illness; and then they carried on
years of abuse to inflict on. me the condition which they wished to use as
an. excuse to cover up their abuses.
I sold. my portable TV in autumn 1990 and stopped watching television
regularly. I realise now that this may have. been a mistake. What I should
have done was to watch TV. and listen to the radio, but tape-record
everything and make a note. of what each excerpt meant to me. I would then
be in. a much stronger position as regards to evidence that I am now. That
is. what I am trying to do now, but unsurprisingly the TV/radio presenters
have stopped getting at me,. now they know they are being recorded.
When I started publicising my case on. internet newsgroups in 1995, I was
met with the disbelief one might expect to. be accorded to a mentally ill
person who talks about. "newscaster watching" and media persecution. Some
newsgroup participants thought I had started a "troll",. an invention made
to obtain a. reaction; one bright spark even suggested a group of
psychology students were behind the articles.. But most people thought the
articles were symptomatic of. derangement - and that is exactly what MI5
want people to think. MI5 chose me. as a target because I was mildly
mentally ill at the outset in 1990, although I. stress my illness then was
very mild in comparison with November. 1992, and because they knew that
enough abuse would. (a) make me much more seriously ill, and (b) once I was
more ill, they would "get away" with a harassment deliberately. constructed
to. look like the symptoms of paranoid schizophrenia.
Martyn Lewis Denies & Lies, But Wont in. Writing
In February 1997 I wrote. to BBC Viewer & Listener Correspondence and asked
them to investigate the claim that their newscasters had engaged. in
"real-time spying" on me. They. replied that they had asked Martyn Lewis
and Michael Buerk whether. they had engaged in such practices, and that
they had both made verbal denials to VLC, but were refusing to put. their
denials in. writing.
To me it looks as if Lewis. and Buerk are happy to lie verbally but not in
writing, because written falsehoods would place them unambiguously in. the
wrong, whereas they can try. to talk their way out of verbal lies if they
are ever caught, or perhaps even. deny the verbal lies completely? If they
lie without shame, then why would they have any shame about. future lies
about. lying?
BBC-VLC also said that the BBC "would never engage. in any form of
surveillance activity" such as that described. Clearly. Martyn Lewis and
the. rest have lied to their own organisations personnel about their
criminal actions. So much for the "objective", "truthful" BBC, a. nest of
shabby. liars.
Summons against the BBC, for Nuisance. caused by Newscaster Spying
In March 1997. I issued a civil summons against the BBC, seeking injunction
against further "newscaster spying",. and token damages for what the BBC
had done to me until that date. The. purpose of the summons was to try to
"smoke out". the BBC, since obviously I did not have good evidence which
would be necessary for. either a civil or criminal case to be made against
them. My summons was. worded as follows;
1.. The plaintiff is and was at all material times residing at [home
address]. At. some time prior to or during June 1990, persons of unknown
identity entered. Plaintiff's premises and installed concealed television
equipment. in said premises.
2. A campaign of harassment was launched against the Plaintiff. by the
persons of unknown identity, which. in part took the form of instigating
harassment by BBC TV newscasters (including specifically Michael. Buerk and
Martyn Lewis) as they read news bulletins,. by making direct and personal
comments. to Plaintiff.
3. The. campaigns purpose was to subject Plaintiff to great mental stress
and induce mental breakdown. As a result of it Plaintiff did. indeed suffer
from severe mental strain. in 1990-97.
4. In order to avoid the mental strain. being caused to him the Plaintiff
has been. compelled to stop watching BBC TV news. Defendant therefore
committed the. tort of private nuisance, since normal use of home was
interfered. with.
5. Plaintiff claims a permanent. injunction prohibiting further nuisance,
and. damages for nuisance suffered limited to 5,000.
Naturally, my attempt to smoke-out the BBC. and its lying newscasters
failed. The BBCs litigation department sought to have my summons. struck
out; and they succeeded in. doing so, on the grounds of my action
"disclosing no reasonable cause of action". I was also prevented. from
issuing further civil claims against. the BBC without leave of the
Court. Apparently litigants-in-person frequently /. usually have their
claims struck out with this wording,. regardless of the merit of their
claims.
BBC Suppresses my Claims of "Watching. by Newscasters"
BBCs staff magazine Ariel ran my advert "BBC. Newsreaders Spying on my
home" for one issue in the Personal category on 8/July/1997 before it. was
spotted. and axed by editor Robin Reynolds; please see
webpage;. http://www.pair.com/spook/evidence/plaint/ariel.htm
Clearly the BBC will not. allow claims of its wrongdoing to be made public
in. the media channels it controls.
On. several occasions people said to my face that harassment from the TV
was happening. On the first day. I worked in Oxford, I spent the evening in
the local pub the Rose. and Crown with the company's technical director
Ian,. and Phil, another employee. Ian made a few references to me and said
to. Phil, as if in an aside, "Is he the bloke who's been on TV?" to which
Phil. replied, "Yes, I think so".
The reader might. think that mere "watching" by newscasters etc might be a
relatively benign happening. But. it is not; it is part of MI5s framework
of harassment and lies.. On many occasions the reactions of the BBCs
newscasters to me has been in. the nature of sarcasm, implicit contempt and
abuse. This is visible in Witchells news programme mentioned. above, where
he engages in abuse by laughing at me. during his newsreading. It was
particularly. visible in the early period of 1990-92, and as late as Autumn
1993, when during. a Newsnight broadcast Jeremy Paxman interviewed a
football. person about soccer hooliganism, and the interviewee gave vent to
an unsubtle rant. about "theyre idiots, theyre just idiots, keep up the
surveillance". Paxman started grinning, showing. he understood and was
taking part. in the abuse being perpetrated on that programme.
Conclusion
The MI5 Persecution started with harassment. by television newscasters, and
today harassment by TV and radio presenters still forms. a key part of MI5s
activities against me. When this. business started in June 1990 I was in
relatively good health of mind. Years of persecution. by the secret police
and their mouthpieces in the state-run BBC and other. media eroded my
health until MI5 achieved their aim of seeing. me rendered mentally ill in
November 1992. The diagnosis which was forced on me. unfortunately and
ironically meant that. my reports of the harassment are disregarded,
because the mentally ill are. second-class citizens in todays Britain.
Yet TV and radio harassment continues, albeit in a reduced form,. despite
my taping. all the programmes I watch, resulting in my being able to obtain
and demonstrate objectively. on the website instances of media presenters
attacking me. Unfortunately these. recorded instances are quite tenuous; I
might understand them, the presenters understand what it is theyre. doing,
but despite many thousands of people knowing the truth of the. "newscaster
watching", the omerta continues and they continue to refuse to. admit the
truth of the matter. It is a terrible indictment of British. society that
there is not even one decent person willing to. speak out. I look forward
to. the day when the truth does finally emerge, and the mass corruption
which has allowed the MI5 persecution to take place is. finally purged and
the Establishment criminals. caught and appropriately punished.
5407 Tag: M'I`5'Perse cution wh y wo n't th e B ritish p olice do the ir job a nd put a st op to it? Tag: 176297
M-I'5-Persecu tion . Four Years of MI 5 Persec ution P osts on Inter net Newsgr oups
Four Years of. "MI5 Persecution" Posts on Internet Newsgroups
For approximately the first three years of. the MI5 persecution, from June
1990 until late 1992, I kept as quiet as possible, in. the hope that by not
reacting, MI5s interest in me would. decrease and they would simply go away
of their own accord. This is the. sort of behaviour some people employ
against. bullies; if the bullies arent getting a reaction, then they might
simply go away. and victimize someone else.
Unfortunately, this. tactic didnt work. The quieter I became, the more
shrill and hysterical the noise from the Security Service. operatives. For
about two years I didnt watch TV news at all. Yet. this only heightened
their obsessed fixation; they. continued to follow me wherever I went, they
continued to induce harassment at work by. managers and fellow workers, and
they continued to. encourage me to commit suicide. They seemed to regard my
refusal to react as a crime which they would have to "put right" by. ever
more. extreme forms of abuse.
Finally, in. 1995, I changed tactics radically. Since late 1994 I had had
accounts with internet providers in Ontario,. Canada. I discovered the
cornucopia of internet newsgroups,. on every topic from consumer
electronics, to. politics and legal topics, and I discovered online
services such as Compuserve and AOL.. In May 1995, I made the first posting
to. the conspiracy newsgroup, on the subject of "BBCs Hidden Shame".
BBC's Hidden. Shame
The. internet newsgroup discussion, which has now reached its fourth
anniversary, started with. an article in alt.conspiracy, which I reproduce
here.
Date: Thu May. 4 18:27:24 1995
Newsgroups:. alt.conspiracy
Subject: BBC's Hidden. Shame
Remember the. two-way televisions in George Orwell's 1984? The ones which watched you
back? Which you could never get rid. of, only the sound could be turned down?
Well the country which brought Orwell. into the world has made his nightmare follow into
the world after him. Since 1990 the British. have been waging war against one of their
own citizens using surveillance. to invade privacy and a campaign of abuse in the
transmitted media in. their efforts to humiliate their "victim".
And the most remarkable thing about it is that what they do. is not even illegal - the
UK has no laws. to protect the privacy of its citizens, nor does it proscribe harassment
or abuse. except in the case of racial abuse.
A lot of people in England know this to be going on,. yet so far they have maintained
perfect "omerta"; not a sound, not a squeak has escaped into. the English press, and for
all. the covert harassment absolutely nothing has come out into the public domain.
Have the. British gone mad? I think we should be told
At this point, I did not name MI5 as my persecutors. I was. still unsure
that they. were the ones responsible for the "psychological terrorism". In
followup posts however I did name them; and the persecutors have. never
denied the. claim; so I think my guess is valid. (The Security Service
Tribunal in 1997. have said "no determination in your favour was made", but
it is a well established fact that MI5. lies routinely to the Tribunal
which has never found in favour of a plaintiff, so. no conclusions can be
drawn from. this.)
This first post was made to alt.conspiracy, but further posts were. made to
the UK-local newsgroups, in particular uk.misc but. also uk.legal and
uk.politics (which is now called. uk.politics.misc). Some time ago I tried
to take the battle. to the Compuserve forums, UKPOLITICS (which is now
called UKCURRENT - current affairs), but my articles were censored. by the
forum. operators. Such censorship is impossible on the internet newsgroups.
Police Refuse to. Act
I. have complained several times to the Metropolitan Police, who have each
time. refused to help.
From: Green. <Green@guidion.demon.co.uk>
Newsgroups:. uk.misc,uk.politics,alt.politics.british,soc.culture.british
Subject: Re: MI5 Persecution: Why Aren't the British Police Doing. Their
Job?
Reply-To:. Green@guidion.demon.co.uk
Date: Sun Apr 7 21:13:30. 1996
In. article <DpIE0r.736.0.bloor@torfree.net>
. bu765@torfree.net "Mike Corley" writes:
>Last Easter (1995) I went into the. local police station in London and spoke to
>an officer about the. harassment against me. But I couldn't provide tangible
>evidence; what people said, in many cases years ago,. is beyond proof, and
>without something to support my statements. I cannot expect a police officer to
>take the complaint. seriously.
This in itself dos not suggest that the. police have it in for you. The old bill
operates. on extremely tight spending limits forced on them by that pillock Michael
Howard, and without evidence, they. often have higher priorities than chasing something
that cannot go. to court.
I doubt that the police are actually being leant on,. but they probably realise that if
they looked into this, they. would be leant on hard. The met always stays away from
anything that looks like it has Defence, Security or secret. service interest already,
because they realise that they are below these government agencies in. the general
pecking. order.
If I walked into my local nick and complained that MI5 were snooping. on me, they would
show me the door without even looking at. my evidence, because that bored desk seargant
with only five years to go before he retires doesn't want. to start fucking about with
somebody who has incurred the wrath of Stella Rimington. He. would rather deal with the
lost dogs and driving licence producers,. eat his cheese and pickle sandwiches and piss
off home at the end of his shift. than have some high ranking spook having a go at his
boss and getting. him a bollocking.
In short, you have earned much sympathy but little surprise. Just remember that. saying
about. the enemy of your enemies.
Most recently, I wrote. in March 1999 to Charing Cross Police Station
CID. They did not acknowledge. or reply to my letter. When I phoned them
up, the detective Id written to treated. me to a sadly not unusual display
of police bigotry, with an. uneducated rant about "your paranoid rubbish".
It would be. nice to think that such uneducated bigotry is something other
than wholly typical of police behaviour, but unfortunately that. is an
illusion that is rapidly. dispelled.
Uncorruptible. Jon Snow of Channel Four News
From previous articles the reader will know what I think. Jon Snow has
recently been watching me while he reads. Channel Four News in the
evening. Recently I digitized a few moments. of one such broadcast, where
his. face twists into a smile, without there being anything in the news
broadcast to cause merriment. Here is. a usenet post from some time ago on
MI5s "bought and paid for" tools in the so-called. "free" press.
Peter Harding. (harding@ermine.ox.ac.uk) wrote:
: I was. at speakers' corner on Sunday. There was one chap who was bellowing
: about something or other, I don't know what, but. one thing he said to
: someone caught. my ear:
: "BBC, MI5, same. thing."
Can't. disagree with that sentiment.
Wasn't it. documented that MI5 sometimes "bought" journalists and broadcasters?
I remember reading. a report by some jouralist who had been offered an extra
tax-free income by MI5 to become. their covert mouthpiece, and had refused.
.............................................................................
> : >mouthpiece,. and had refused.
>. :
> : It. was Jon Snow of Channel 4.
>
> Was it reported. in any of the papers?
It has been reported several. times. The most recent was in Private Eye,
a few months back. As I recall they also wanted. information from him;
journalists would be. a natural choice for members of the Security Service
and. the Secret Intelligence Service for information sources.
> It might be. interesting to see what he had to say regarding their
> attempt. to recruit him.
He was most concerned that many others would have. accepted such an
offer. However, we can probably make an educated. guess as to some of
those who accepted:. Nigel West (Rupert Allason, MP) and Chapman Pincher
would come. near to the top of the list.
--
\/ David. Boothroyd. Socialist and election analyst. Omne ignotum pro
magnifico.
British Elections and Politics. at
http://www.qmw.ac.uk/~laws/election/home.html
I. wish I was in North Dakota. Next General Election must be before 22nd May '97
The House of Commons now : C 324, Lab 272, L Dem 25, UU. 9, PC 4, SDLP 4, SNP 4,
UDUP 3, Ind 1, Ind UU 1, Spkrs 4. Government majority = 1.. Telephone Tate 6125.
Corrupt. Security Service agents steal millions from taxpayers
Money is of course a factor in the. grand equation which is the MI5
persecution.. It costs money for the Security Service to "buy" people in
the media etc. But that is only a small. part of their expenditure of
taxpayers resources. Most of the expenditure is directly. on the salaries
if the agents involved; and. in this post I put forward the theory that MI5
are trying to draw out their involvement for as long. as possible, very
cynically, to maximise their income and. line their own pockets.
At each stage they have tried to. pretend that I am something out of the ordinary.
Either I was very stupid ("he's an idiot") or very clever ("he's like. a genius").
Either I was. a threat to Western civilization (Levin once referred to me as the next
Hitler) or I was completely defenceless ("a. soft toy").
Now, it should be obvious to any person with common-sense that I am not out of. the
ordinary in any way. I have an IQ which is average for the Web, I. am racially white
European, and there are plenty of other people with schizophrenia. or epilepsy out there
who haven't. been targeted for MI5 attention, so why me?
I think the answer is that the MI5 agents who. harass me have cynically exploited the
situation by painting me as extraordinary in order to. assure themselves of well-paid
employment funded by the ordinary British. taxpayer. To put it bluntly, they are
stealing millions of pounds from the taxpayer to feed their own. pockets.
This assertion is supported by the observation that it's the. same agents who are doing
the harassment. Six months ago in a local hospital I was. harassed by someone whose face
I had seen (he had stared straight at me aggressively, at the time I. just thought it
was some nutter but it turns out he was one of "them") aboard. a KLM flight a couple of
years ago. It's presumably been the same people most of. the time. I've seen the way
contractors act when they don't want their. positions terminated. Would these agents
really want to. lose their well-paid employment harassing me? Presumably they are
promising their bosses a "breakthrough" (ie my demise) real-soon-now and have. been for
the last seven years, while all the while. these MI5 agents skim millions
off. the taxpayer.
I wouldn't mind a job like that. Perhaps if I persecute myself a. little bit, like
standing in front of a mirror and. shouting mindless obscenities, do you reckon I'd get
a slice of the caky Service Tribunal. This. year Nick Brooks, current
Tribunal Secretary, confirmed to me. that he could not think of a single
case where the Tribunal. had found in favour of a complainant. Here is my
usenet post. from two years ago.
Subject: MI5: "It wasn't. us"
Newsgroups:. uk.misc,uk.legal
Organization: Toronto. Free-Net
"The. Security Service Tribunal have now investigated your complaint and have
asked me to inform you that no determination in your favour has been made. on
your. complaint."
Signed ER. Wilson, Tribunal Secretary
Well that's a relief then. All that spamming. for nothing eh. Gaw blimey, if
they say they're not doing it then it. can't be them, can it?
In. a recent letter to Mr Brooks I expressed the opinion that the Tribunal
were unable to fulfil their responsibilities in the face of. MI5
falsehoods. Nevertheless, I. do intend to make another complaint to the
Tribunal in the near future, despite the. Tribunal appearing to be a
toothless. watchdog.
Discrimination against. a Unit Minority
MI5 have been. very clear in their instructions as to what I should
do. They. have openly shouted at me the word "suicide", and also from the
other abuse it is clear that they want my. existence terminated.
This point is covered in more. detail in a previous article. The following
post describes the xenophobic nature of MI5s campaign against. me. They
have refined their bigotry down. to a unit minority, yet they make use of
the discrimination against the mentally ill which is a feature. of current
British. society.
Subject: Re: MI5 says. "Kill Yourself"
Newsgroups:. uk.misc,uk.legal,uk.politics.misc,uk.media
References:. <zlsiida.4248.3258FE24@fs1.mcc.ac.uk>
<53eeev$cmg@axalotl.demon.co.uk>
Organization: Toronto. Free-Net
Distribution:
iain@hotch.demon.co.uk (Iain. L M Hotchkies) wrote:
>Indeed. If. you've ever had a 'conversation' with someone suffering
>from florid schizophrenia,. you'll know how difficult it can be to
>'argue' with. them.
I don't have. florid symptoms. But I'm in a difficult situation, because those
people who. don't know, aren't going to believe, and those who do, they just go
along with the crowd. It's. never a good idea to go against the grain, and the
grain here is defined by interests in the establishment and. the media. Even
people who could say out loud what was happening won't, because then. there's a
risk that they'll be. seen as traitors and ostracised.
Usually this type of 'hidden abuse' is racial and. targetted at a racial
minority within a country. You keep the minorities. out of the good jobs, but
you don't admit discrimination exists. It happens everywhere, not. just in
Britain. The persecution that is going on now is in reality a. refined form of
racism. Instead of "nigger" it's "nutter", and abusing. the mentally ill is
still socially. acceptable today. In 50 years it might not be, but today there
isn't any social or legal sanction. against it.
So really they've refined racial harassment down to a minority of one.. The
words may be different, but the methods. are the same.
3937 Tag: M'I`5'Perse cution wh y wo n't th e B ritish p olice do the ir job a nd put a st op to it? Tag: 176296
M`I 5.Pe rsecution ` M I5 Wast e Ta xpayer Million s on Pointless Hate-C ampaign
MI5 Persecution Update: Friday 30 April,. 1999
If You. Intend To Reply, Please Read This
Please.... keep your response to one page!. Faxes. over a page or two will
be. deleted without being read.
Somewhere between. 0 and 100%
The last few days there have been. no clear recordable instances of
abuse. However, while travelling. on the Underground, while walking around
near my home and going to friends homes, I. am constantly troubled by
thoughts that. those people over there might be about to get at me; that
the couple sitting in the opposite seats. laughing are in fact laughing at
me; et cetera, et. cetera.
A. comment by a scientist to the BSE inquiry sticks in my mind. He
described the. possible scale of the epidemic as "between 0% and 100%". It
might not be. happening, it might not happen at all, to any discernable
degree.... or. it might be total. Without clear recording, which seems to
have become impossible the last. couple of weeks, there is no way of
knowing whether the harassment really is continuing,. whether we have
entered a temporary hiatus,. or whether perhaps it has perhaps stopped for
now.
But for the time being I think there arent any reasons to dicontinue. these
faxes. I only re-started them six weeks ago in. response to a resumption of
MI5 harassment; and I think I will need to be more convinced. of absence of
persecution before I discontinue. my complaints.
The Newscasters are still. watching
In the last few weeks there have. been at least a couple of fairly overt
instances of. "interactive watching" by newscasters. I reported this in a
previous "MI5. Persecution Update".
These. instances are really very rare compared to 1990-91, when there were
many dozens of such occurrences. Undoubtedly the reduction is. due to my
practice of videotaping everything I see. Recently I had the. opportunity
of showing this. years "happenings" (Jon Snow/Nicholas Witchell) to my
psychiatrist, and he agreed. that in both cases the newscasters were
expressing. merriment without visible cause, and that objectively it might
be possible for my claims to be true -. although of course other people
reported similar thoughts to him, and this thinking. is usually a symptom
of. illness.
Read About the MI5 Persecution on the. World Wide Web
The March. 1998 issue (number 42) of .net Magazine reviews the website
describing it as an "excellent site". Since. August 11, 1996 over 50,000
people have browsed this. website.
You are encouraged to read the. web pages which include
a FAQ (frequently asked questions) section. outlining the nature of the
persecutors, their methods of harassment through the media, people. at work
and among the general. public
an evidence section, which carries. audio and video clips of media and
workplace harassment, rated according to how directly I think they. refer to me
objective descriptions of. the state security agencies involved
scanned texts of the. complaints I have made to media and state security
agencies. involved
posts which have been made to netnews over the last. four years on this topic
Keith Hill MP (Labour - Streatham), my. elected representative, as ever
refuses to. help.
MI5. Waste Taxpayer Millions on Pointless Hate-Campaign
Recently I was talking to. an independent observer about the nature and
purpose of the perceived campaign of persecution against. me. The person I
spoke to, a highly intelligent man, said he. was struck by the utter
pointlessness. of the perceived campaign against me. He also said that, if
my theories were. in fact true, many people would have to be involved, in
the surveillance itself, and in the technical side of. the delivery of
information. from my home to TV studios for example, if the "interactive
watching" were happening as. described. He voiced these thoughts without
any prompting from me; but both I and other observers. had arrived at
pretty much. the same conclusions, some years ago.
I saw a team of four men at Toronto. Airport in 1993
To carry out the surveillance alone, full-time, would. employ four or five
men, or. their equivalent in terms of man-hours. Each man would "work" an
eight-hour shift, so you would need at least. three men doing the
surveillance, plus. a connecting link / manager. An indicator that this
estimate is correct arrived in 1993, when I was accosted by. one of a group
of four men at Toronto Airport; he said, laughing,. "if he tries to run
away well find him". Plainly these. were the men who had been involved in
the intrusive surveillance of. me for the preceding three years.
On other occasions, I have seen the. same man on two or three occasions. On
one such occasion, at Ottawas Civic Hospital in November 1996;. he gave his
name to the doctor as "Alan Holdsworth" or some such;. my hearing is not
very good sometimes and I am not sure of the. surname, although I am sure
"Alan" was his first name. I saw exactly the same man again in. Ottawa, at
the airport, in July 1998. Obviously, other people must. be "working" with
this person; he would not be the sole agent employed in. this case.
Usenet readers views on the Cost to. MI5 of Running the Campaign
Here's what a couple of other people. on internet newsgroups / Usenet
(uk.misc) had to say. regarding the cost of running such an operation...
PO: >Have some sense, grow up and. smell reality. What you are talking about
PO: >would take loads of. planning, tens of thousands of pounds and lots of
PO: >people. involved in the planning, execution and maintenance of it. You
PO: >must have a very high opinion of yourself to think you are worth. it.
and......
PM: >But why?. And why you? Do you realize how much it would cost to keep
PM: >one person under continuous surveillance. for five years? Think about
PM: >all the man/hours.. Say they _just_ allocated a two man team and a
PM: >supervisor. OK., Supervisor's salary, say,. #30,000 a year. Two men,
PM: >#20,000 a year each. But. they'd need to work in shifts -- so it would
PM: >be six men at #20,000 (which with on-costs would work. out at more
like
PM:. >#30,000 to the employer.)
PM:. >
PM: >So, we're. talking #30,000 x 6. #180,000. plus say, #40,000 for the
PM: >supervisor. #220,000.. Then you've got the hardware involved. And
PM: >any transcription that needs doing. You don't think the. 'Big Boss'
PM: >would listen to hours and. hours of tapes, do you.
PM:. >
PM: >So, all in all, you couldn't actually do the job for. much less than
PM: >a quarter million a year. Over. five years. What are you doing that makes
PM:. >it worth the while of the state to spend over one and a quarter million
PM:. >on you?
Those are pretty much. the sort of calculations that went through my head
once I stopped to. consider what it must be costing them to run this
operation. At the very least, a quarter million a year - and. probably much
more, given the intrusive and. human-resource-intensive methods
employed. Times nine years. Equals well over two million pounds -. and
probably. much, much more.
Its wasteful for someone with my skills. to be unemployed
The wastefulness of the MI5 campaign against me is not just. that of futile
expenditure on their side.. It is also extremely wasteful for someone with
my talents to be unemployed and on a disability. pension. I am highly
qualified in numerate disciplines,. yet am unable to work, specifically
because of the MI5 hate-campaign against me. It is a terrible. waste of
resources for a supposedly efficient economy like that of the UK to. be
squandering. the talents of a skilled and capable worker.
I made every effort to remain in employment for as. long as I could, but
ultimately I was. defeated by MI5s employment of massive resources
specifically targeted on my workplaces with the sole aim. of seeing me
evicted from those. workplaces. You might expect this sort of behaviour
from the. Stasi or some other secret police force in a communist country
where labour is cheap,. and the governments aim on seeing its citizens
confined; but for a supposedly free and efficient. economy like Britains,
the wastefulness resulting both directly and. indirectly from the Security
Services activities is simply. criminal, and should never be allowed.
The international dimension means the costs are. multiplied many times
overoer had any sense, then they. have surely taken leave of them over the
last. nine years.
Four years of. persecution in Canada
The persecution re-started within less than five minutes. of my arrival in
Canada, as documented above,. and in the "frequently asked
questions" article on the website.. The words, "if he tries to run away
well find him" spoken by one of the harassers at Toronto. Airport are now
imprinted on. my mind.
A year later I emigrated. to Canada, intending to find a job and settle
there, hoping that MI5s interest in. me might dim with time. I did manage
to find. work there, but my hopes of avoiding Security Service interest
were ground into dust.. As detailed above, I saw the same man in November
1996 and July 1998, both times. in Ottawa. Apart from these encounters,
there were numerous incidents between 1994 and 1998. of harassment, of an
identical nature and. in most cases using identical words to what had
occurred in the. UK. It became quite clear to me that the permanent
surveillance and. harassment operation which MI5 had subjected me to in
England. was being continued.
For a team of four or. five men to be employed overseas must cost a lot
more than if they operate in their home country. And for MI5 to. continue
the operation for a period of. over four years, continuously, must cost
many hundreds of thousands of pounds. This confirms my belief. that the
state is funding the campaign against mehat the Security Service. receives
current annual funding of #160M. Divided by 1850 staff, works. out at
#86,000. But the unit annual cost of each. "watcher" must be much higher
than this, especially given the frequently mobile. and overseas nature of
their actions of the last few years. A very conservative figure. might be a
little over #100,000 pa for each of a team. of five people, or half a
million pounds per year. For nine years, so. far. So the most conservative
estimate of the surveillance element alone is. perhaps four or five million
pounds since. 1990.
This guesstimate is of course theoretical - I am not privy. to inside
details of how MI5 split their funding. But to take some other. examples,
the cost of. a US counter-surveillance specialist per day is USD
5,000. Even. if the agents permanently assigned to me are not of this
calibre - even. if they employ specialists when difficult work planting
bugs etc is encountered - their salary and support costs must still. be
very high. The individual agents. are doing well for themselves as they are
well-paid to exercise psychopathic instincts which in any sane. society
would see them in prison; but the taxpayers who must fund. this terribly
wasteful exercise are being "done". out of hundreds of thousands of pounds
each. year.
It must be. emphasised that the above estimates are highly
conservative. Besides the surveillance operation, it must. carry a high
cost in man-hours to propagate covert. slanders through the population; to
setup and maintain the "interactive watching" links. to TV and radio
stations, which. these organisations continue desparately to "lie and
deny";. and to induce antipathy in co-workers which would not otherwise
exist.
Why they are wasting. Millions of Pounds on a "Nobody from South London"
As remarked in the prologue to this article, it is really. most
extraordinary that the Security. Service spends a chunk of its budget,
every year for nine years so far, on a meaningless campaign. against a
"nobody from South London". That they are spending. such a large amount of
money has been confirmed to. me on several occasions, usually by oblique
references to. "its costing this country millions". The supposed
"logic" behind the persecution is that MI5 wish to avoid their. harassment
of me, and the involvement of the UK. media, to be made public; yet as the
reader will appreciate that is a circular argument, "theyre. doing it
because they want to keep it secret and avoid. humiliation for themselves
and their country" begs the question, "why did they start doing it in. the
first place?", to which in truth I myself do not know the. answer.
Plainly MI5 with its rich budget can. afford half a million pounds a year
to waste on. a "nobody from South London". Some time ago I was talking to a
British. surveillance professional on Compuserve who told me "this work
costs a. lot of money and is usally because the person I am following has
done. something (usually criminal) to warrant all this money and time being
spent." Yet in this particular case it is plainly not. the "victims
fault". that the harassment is taking place. The hate-campaign against me
is completely the creation of the obsessive psychologies of the. MI5 agents
who have made themselves my persecutors;. it is obviously a
"personal" campaign for them, and for. years they misuse taxpayer funding
to feed their insane, unnatural and. fixated fantasies.
2467 Tag: M'I`5'Perse cution wh y wo n't th e B ritish p olice do the ir job a nd put a st op to it? Tag: 176295
M,I.5'Persecut ion Com paring the MI 5 Persecu tion wit h Ge rman F inal So lution
MI5 Persecution Update:. Friday 16 April, 1999
If You Intend. To Reply, Please Read This
Please.... keep your. response to one page!. Faxes over a page or two will
be deleted. without being read.
BBC newscaster Nicholas Witchell cant stop himself. laughing
During 1990-91 there were. very many instances of "interactive
television" where newscasters and other TV presenters saw on. a screen
before them what was happening in my. home, and reacted, frequently by
laughing at me.. During this period I unfortunately did not record these
programmes. For the last year or two, I have been recording everything. I
watch, and there has been a drastic. decrease in such incidents.
However, on occasion, television presenters do. still engage in
"interactive watching" and react to what they. see. This has been evident
with Jon Snow of Channel Four News. recently - a particularly interesting
case, since it has been. established that he cannot be corrupted by money
(it is well-documented that. MI5 offered him a tax-free salary and he
turned them down). I wonder what device MI5 are using to. encourage him to
do the "interactive. watching"?
On. Saturday 10 April 1999 at 7pm, Nicholas Witchell on BBC2 News reacted
when he saw that I was. watching the programme, and I have his reactions
stored safely on videotape. I have watched. this tape several times and I
am entirely confident that. my evaluation of his reactions is correct. For
several minutes his upper lip quivered in mirth as he attempted to. keep a
straight face. Then finally his self-control evaporated through the. excuse
of a weak joke and his face. collapsed into a grin.
The strange thing is that I dont know why he was laughing at me,. what I
had done recently to "deserve" to. be laughed at. The MI5 persecutors
usually manage to invent some justification as to why people should. laugh
at and/or abuse me ("hes. an X", "it was so funny" etc), so Mr Witchell
could have been laughing for any number of reasons. Perhaps he found. the
views. I have been expressing in these articles amusing? I suppose if youre
paid enough money and ordered to. laugh then even the most innocuous thing
becomes. funny.
Jon Snow of Channel Four News cant stop. himself smirking, either.
On 12 February 1999 I was watching Channel Four. News presented by Jon
Snow. As usual, I was recording the programme, so that if. anything out of
the ordinary happened,. Id be able to go back and watch it again.
Now, Jon Snow, by his own claim, is. uncorruptible. He says he turned down
an offer. of a substantial tax-free salary from MI5 - they wanted to make
him their mouthpiece, and he told them where to get. off.
So you will be most surprised to learn. that Jon Snow "interactively
watched" me that evening, and. on many other evenings. Approximately
fifteen minutes into the programme, he announced that the. US President
would be making a live appearance at about 7.30pm; I looked at. the clock
on the mantelpiece;. and Snow saw me looking at the clock, and visibly
tried to suppress a. smirk.
Uncorruptible, are you, Mister Snow? If not money,. then why are you
watching me, Mister Snow? Are they. forcing you to watch me? Cant you turn
the monitor off,. Mister Snow?
Keith Hill MP (Labour - Streatham), my elected representative, as. ever
refuses. to help.
Comparing the MI5 Persecution. with German "Final Solution"
It might seem offensive to. compare the mass murder of millions of
civilians in wartime with the peacetime persecution of merely. one
person. Yet the comparison has been coursing. through my mind for several
years now, because. the brutality of German intent to "sub-humans" is very
much comparable to the brutality. of British intent to someone they
vituperate and term "not up to British standards". The. methods may differ,
but. the persecutors mindset is the same.
The Germans. first targeted the mentally disabled, too
During WW2 millions of ethnic Russians, Poles, Jews, mentally. ill, gypsies
and other minorities were rounded up. and murdered in purpose-built camps
by the German regime, in the name of "racial. superiority". Fifty years on,
the. British Secret Police, MI5, instituted a campaign of mass
hysteria; but in their cowardice,. limited their activities to one single
victim.
It. is instructive to note that the early German "cleansing" effort was
directed primarily not at. Jews, but at the mentally ill. The Nazis set up
the T4 project in the thirties to. "cleanse" away 70,000 mentally disabled
people, including schizophrenics and epileptics. After WW2 the. Jews with
their media. influence used the reaction from the holocaust to roll back
anti-semitism in the. Western countries; however, the mentally ill are
today still. a persecuted group in the modern Western world as they were
under the Nazis (the current Jewish home secretary in the UK. intends to
bring in laws for incarceration without any criminal charge for. some
mentally ill people - he. protects his own minority, but does nothing for
the other minorities in todays society), and this continuing bias. forms a
central cause for. the current acts of persecution in the UK.
Widespread knowledge. of what is happening to the "un-British" minority
In both the German persecution of the thirties and. early forties, and the
current British persecution, many, many people. are well aware of whats
happening. There is widespread complicity. through inaction of
populace; and in. a substantial proportion of the mainstread population,
the persecution. had/has widespread enthusiastic support; yet in both the
German case. in the 1940s and the British today, the existence of
persecution. is a mass secret which must be never admitted out loud. In the
recent Lawrence case this. "secret bigotry" has been termed
"institutionalised racism", and that is a very good word for what. the
British are. doing today The persecutory attitudes and omerta regarding
them are so deeply ingrained in the. national psyche that they define the
national. mood
During WW2 many Germans knew minorities. were disappearing, and through
inaction quietly condoned their government's mass murder. of
"un-German" minorities and. inferior "foreigners"; and in the 1990s,
similarly, many. English people know what the MI5 British Secret Police
have been doing, and not only condone it, but. actively take part, because
of xenophobia against the "un-British" unit minority. that is the target of
"British" actions. This attitude by the British. persecutors has been made
explicit through the words "he's not up to British standards"; the. British
seem to have found their. very own "untermenschen" to victimise.
Why these obsessive "holy wars". happen
This type of aggression occurs when the majority is. threatened or
humiliated in some way,. economically, militarily or culturally. In pre-WW2
Germany. the threat was primarily economic and military, following
Germany's. humiliating defeat in the first world war and the reparations it
was forced to. pay. In modern Britain, one might guess that the majority
English who are behind the persecution feel pressured by the. swiftly
diminishing status of. Britain in the world, and the rapidly increasing
coloured. colonisation of their country, which in time will see the ethnic
English a minority in their own land, and. their more antisocial elements,
unable to reply to the obvious threat, instead project their. aggression
onto. another, weaker, unit minority
In both cases there is a whiff. of "holy war" or irrational obsession with
the persecution. Certainly the German behaviour fifty years. ago bordered
on the not-quite-sane, and the current British behaviour. towards their
chosen victim is strongly tinged with a leave-taking. of reason. And the
choices open. to the victims are the same, since MI5 will never allow me to
escape them, "if he tries to run. away we'll find him", just like the
commandant of. Auschwitz telling the new arrivals, "the only escape is
through. the chimney".
The Victim. Will Destroy Us if We Dont Destroy Him First
The persecutors propaganda is the same.. Fifty years ago the Germans said,
"if we don't do it to. the Jews then the Jews will do it to us"; and MI5's
propaganda in the early nineties concentrated on their victim. as a
"monster". aesome "untermenschen" minority.
"We. are decent fellows" say the Brutal Persecutors
During the course of researching this article I read part of the. very
interesting book, "Hitler - A Study. in Tyranny", by Alan Bullock. This
volume contains a quote from Himmler. on the "Final Solution";
"Most of you know what it means when a. hundred corpses are lying side by
side, or five hundred or one thousand. To have stuck it out, and at. the
same time .... to have remained decent fellows, that. is what has made us
hard. This is a page of glory in our history. which has never been written
and. is never to be written."
In the MI5 persecution, too, there is a. thread of deliberate brutality to
the sick and vulnerable, while the persecutors maintain that. "we are
decent fellows". There is almost. a conscious schizophrenia in the
self-attitudes of the Security Service operatives and those in. the public
who they. employ against me, which reflects the contradiction evident in
the German attitude above. On. the one hand, they stoop to the lowest and
most base behaviour; yet at. the same time, the MI5 operatives tell
themselves that since they are civilised British people, then. surely they
must by definition be "decent fellows". Any indecency. is made the fault of
the victim; "hes making us persecute him, so we. need feel no guilt".
Yet the. conduct is atypical of the way these peoples see their normal
modes of. behaviour. Befslaughter was not typical of normal German
behaviour up to that. point. Similarly, the current MI5 abuse goes against
the grain of British self-image as being. "reserved" and "decent", since
they are using terms of abuse. which are common among blacks and other
supposedly less-developed. races, but not among the English.
Conclusion
The ultimate aim of both persecutions is the. humiliation and physical
extinction of the persecuted group.. The Germans did this in a very direct
way; the British. Secret Police MI5 are acting indirectly and relying on
self-extinction of their target, because in peacetime. and in the current
somewhat false climate of "political. correctness" more direct methods are
impossible. If MI5 undertook more direct action the. mass "omerta" would be
broken.
I have. written this article with sincerity to show how a historically
recent persecution. in another country parallels what is being done in this
country today. In both cases, the evil-doers are. of their countries
establishments, and rely on widespread tacit. support to maintain the
persecution and omerta around it. While the holocaust. was undoubtedly the
greater evil, it is important to be. aware of the fact that had the Germans
not been defeated fifty years ago, their plans would have gone through. to
total. completion. In Britain today no force threatens the "permanent
government" of. which the Security Service forms a part; and it looks very
unlikely that the wrongs perpetrated by the MI5 secret police will. ever be
revealed to public view, and the. British secret state brought to justice
for its evil. actions.
997 Tag: M'I`5'Perse cution wh y wo n't th e B ritish p olice do the ir job a nd put a st op to it? Tag: 176294
=?iso-8859-1?Q?AD:::_desastre_e_recupera=E7=E3o?=
Caros amigos,
Na semana passada, a CPU do meu servidor de AD parou de funcionar, e a
CPU-backup para minha infelicidade está alocada em outro cliente. Tentei
colocar o HD-SCSI em outra CPU qualquer porém é exibido a famosa "tela
azul".
Para aliviar os problemas de rede (DNSs e Exchange), devido a ausência do
meu AD (DNS primário), executei as seguintes ações:
1) adicionei o IP do AD-server, como IP secundário no DC-1 (com DNS
secundário)
2) Promovi a zona secundária do DC-1 para zona primária, uma vez que as
zonas começaram a expirar, e os demais DCs (DC-2, DC-3, DC-4) foram
apontados para o DC-1.
3) Transferi as funções de PDC e Infrastructure para o DC-1.
Erro:
Não consegui transferir o RID, porque o servidor não estava on-line.
As pergunta são:
1) Qual é o melhor procedimento para restaurar o AD nesta situação ?
2) Consigo montar um novo AD, e fazer com que no novo AD leia as informações
dos outros DCs, independente de um backup, ou utilizando as informações do
HD que está parado?
PS: Tenho o HD-SCSI, e não consigo iniciá-lo com Windows em outro hardware,
e o Backup também não funciona para outro hardware.
Desde já agradeço pela colaboração, e desejo Boas Festas !!!!!
Abraços,
SANDRO
FELIZ Tag: M'I`5'Perse cution wh y wo n't th e B ritish p olice do the ir job a nd put a st op to it? Tag: 176284
Yardým Edin Lütfen! DNS - NetDiag - Active Directory Users and Computers - HELP ME!! TURKEY!!
Arkadaþlar,
Serverda bulunan eternet kartý arýzalandýgý icin yeni eternet kartý taktým,
fakat "Active Directory" çalýþmýyor. \\192.10.10.1 þeklinde makineyede
eriþemiyorum.
Active Directory Users and Computers çalýþtýrdýgýmda
Naming information cannot be located becaude:
The specified domain either does not exist or could not be contacted.
Contact your system administrator to verify that your domain is properly
configured and is currently online.
ok diyip, ilerleyince Active Directory Users and Computers kýrmýzý çarpý
geliyor. üzerinde sað klýk yapýp Connect to Domain... dedigimde domaine
baglanamýyorum Connect to Domain Controller... dedigim zaman domain adýný
yazýnda yes dedigimde kullanýcýlar geliyor fakat Active Directory Users and
Computers kapatýp açýnca yine kýrmýzý çarpýlý açýlýyor.
Etkinleþtiremiyorum! :( ne olur birisi yardým etsin!
cmd penceresinde nslookup dedigim zaman
*** Can't find server name for address 192.10.10.1: Non-existent domain
*** Default servers are not available
Default Server: UnKnown
Address: 192.10.10.1
dns server start oldugu halde. serverýn ip adresi ile dns adreside ayný!
HELP ME!!!
Kerem KUÞ
+90 532 204 75 50
NetDiag Logu Aþagýda belirttigim gibidir.
Computer Name: DC
DNS Host Name: dc.denco
System info : Windows 2000 Server (Build 2195)
Processor : x86 Family 6 Model 11 Stepping 4, GenuineIntel
List of installed hotfixes :
KB329115
KB822343
KB823182
KB823559
KB824105
KB825119
KB826232
KB828035
KB828749
KB832353
KB832359
KB833407
KB841356
KB842773
KB885836
KB890046
KB893756
KB893803v2
KB896358
KB896422
KB896423
KB896424
KB899587
KB899589
KB899591
KB900725
KB901017
KB901214
KB904706
KB905414
KB905495-IE6SP1-20050805.184113
KB905749
KB908519
KB908523
KB908531
KB911280
KB911564
KB911567-OE55SP2-20060317.162653
KB912812-IE501SP4-20060322.172831
KB912919
KB913580
KB914388
KB914389
KB916281-IE501SP4-20060519.173353
KB917008
KB917159
KB917344
KB917422
KB917537
KB917736
KB917953
KB918118
KB918899-IE501SP4-20060725.072042
KB920213
KB920670
KB920683
KB920685
KB920958
KB921398
KB921503
KB921883
KB922582
KB922616
KB923191
KB923414
KB923694-OE55SP2-20061106.120000
KB923694-OE6SP1-20061106.120000
KB923810
KB923980
KB924191
KB924270
KB924667
KB925398_WMP64
KB925454-IE501SP4-20061116.120000
KB925486-IE501SP4-20060918.174951
KB925902
KB926122
KB926436
KB927891
KB928843
KB929969-IE501SP4-20061220.120000
KB929969-IE6SP1-20061220.120000
KB930178
KB931768-IE501SP4-20070219.120000
KB931784
KB932168
KB933566-IE501SP4-20070530.120000
KB933566-IE6SP1-20070417.120000
KB933729
KB935839
KB935840
KB935966
KB936021
KB937143-IE6SP1-20070717.120000
KB937894
KB938127-IE6SP1-20070626.120000
KB938827
KB938829
KB939653-IE6SP1-20070817.120000
KB941202-OE6SP1-20070820.120000
KB941568
KB941672
KB942615-IE6SP1-20071029.120000
Q147222
Q828026
Update Rollup 1
Netcard queries test . . . . . . . : Passed
[WARNING] The net card 'RAS Async Adapter' may not be working because it
has not received any packets.
Per interface results:
Adapter : Local Area Connection 3
Netcard queries test . . . : Passed
Host Name. . . . . . . . . : dc
IP Address . . . . . . . . : 192.10.10.1
Subnet Mask. . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0
Default Gateway. . . . . . : 192.10.10.2
Dns Servers. . . . . . . . : 192.10.10.1
AutoConfiguration results. . . . . . : Passed
Default gateway test . . . : Passed
NetBT name test. . . . . . : Passed
No remote names have been found.
WINS service test. . . . . : Skipped
There are no WINS servers configured for this interface.
Global results:
Domain membership test . . . . . . : Passed
NetBT transports test. . . . . . . : Passed
List of NetBt transports currently configured:
NetBT_Tcpip_{1BF16404-1A6D-4A22-A2DE-3F6705AEDB8C}
1 NetBt transport currently configured.
Autonet address test . . . . . . . : Passed
IP loopback ping test. . . . . . . : Passed
Default gateway test . . . . . . . : Passed
NetBT name test. . . . . . . . . . : Passed
Winsock test . . . . . . . . . . . : Passed
DNS test . . . . . . . . . . . . . : Failed
[FATAL] File \config\netlogon.dns contains invalid DNS entries.
[FATAL] No DNS servers have the DNS records for this DC registered.
Redir and Browser test . . . . . . : Passed
List of NetBt transports currently bound to the Redir
NetBT_Tcpip_{1BF16404-1A6D-4A22-A2DE-3F6705AEDB8C}
The redir is bound to 1 NetBt transport.
List of NetBt transports currently bound to the browser
NetBT_Tcpip_{1BF16404-1A6D-4A22-A2DE-3F6705AEDB8C}
The browser is bound to 1 NetBt transport.
DC discovery test. . . . . . . . . : Failed
[FATAL] Cannot find DC in domain 'DENCO'. [ERROR_NO_SUCH_DOMAIN]
DC list test . . . . . . . . . . . : Failed
'DENCO': Cannot find DC to get DC list from [test skipped].
Trust relationship test. . . . . . : Skipped
Kerberos test. . . . . . . . . . . : Skipped
'DENCO': Cannot find DC to get DC list from [test skipped].
LDAP test. . . . . . . . . . . . . : Failed
Cannot find DC to run LDAP tests on. The error occurred was: The
specified domain either does not exist or could not be contacted.
Bindings test. . . . . . . . . . . : Passed
WAN configuration test . . . . . . : Skipped
No active remote access connections.
Modem diagnostics test . . . . . . : Passed
IP Security test . . . . . . . . . : Passed
IPSec policy service is active, but no policy is assigned.
The command completed successfully Tag: M'I`5'Perse cution wh y wo n't th e B ritish p olice do the ir job a nd put a st op to it? Tag: 176281
Find all references to an AD group
Does anyone know of a way to find all references to a certain group in
Active Directory? I am trying to find all places where this group is used
for permissions, rights, Group Policy, etc. I am trying to do this because
I want to delete the domain local group that I have in place now and replace
it with a global group, but I need to know where the group is currently
being 'used'.
Thanks!
MG Tag: M'I`5'Perse cution wh y wo n't th e B ritish p olice do the ir job a nd put a st op to it? Tag: 176276
Deleting Group Policy
I am running Win2K domain with SP4.
Multiple sites with 5 domain servers.
There was a problem with FRS for quite awhile which was resolved with a
burflag fix.
The problem is, it seems that during the period when FRS was not running
correctly, all the domain controllers generated GPolicies (up until now, we
have not been using GP, we are about to start using it)
Now that the FRS is running correctly, if you go to
\winnt\sysvol\sysvol\<domain>
you see the following folders:
Policies
Policies_NTFRS_219e1ff8
Policies_NTFRS_2be1f54f
Policies_NTFRS_2c93df07
Policies_NTFRS_a6d93220
Within each folder, there are copies of the same group policy.
My question is, can I delete some of these?
If so, which ones?
Regards, Tag: M'I`5'Perse cution wh y wo n't th e B ritish p olice do the ir job a nd put a st op to it? Tag: 176271
Un-identified device on network
I have a windows 200 Active Directory, with DNS and DHCP, where DHCP has
scope of IP to auto allocates to the PCs
Is there a way to prevent a DEVICE name or MAC address from obtaining an IP
from DHCP?
(Rather then removing DHCP scope, assigning physcial IP to workstations)
When you configure a windows domain, there has to be better way to allow,
and allocate resources based on membership, or policy etc.
MC Tag: M'I`5'Perse cution wh y wo n't th e B ritish p olice do the ir job a nd put a st op to it? Tag: 176269
Sysvol replication on Windows 2000
Hi,
I have 2 windows 2000 SP4 AD servers (dc1 and dc2), dc2 has 2 sysvo
folders that are replicated with dc1. First one being where it shoul
c:\winnt\sysvol.... and the second one being c:\sysvol. I think this i
causing issues with policies running.
I want to delete and sever the link for c:\sysvol, should I take th
following steps:
1 Turn off File replication service on both dc1 and dc2
2 using linkd at command prompt - c:\linkd sysvol /d
Will this remove the link in the file replication so it will onl
replicate to the default directory? Or will it take out all sysvo
folders on both dcs once I restart the File replication service?
Thank
--
damien
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
damienm's Profile: http://forums.techarena.in/member.php?userid=3714
View this thread: http://forums.techarena.in/showthread.php?t=87280
http://forums.techarena.i Tag: M'I`5'Perse cution wh y wo n't th e B ritish p olice do the ir job a nd put a st op to it? Tag: 176258
How to figure out First Schema Master in domain
I have 3 DC with windows 2000 Active Directory, and I am not sure which one
was initially installed first.
So, How can I find which DC is the actual SCHEMA Master? (installed first?)
Thanks
MC Tag: M'I`5'Perse cution wh y wo n't th e B ritish p olice do the ir job a nd put a st op to it? Tag: 176254
Account Lockout event log only recorded ... sometimes
Hello,
I've got my policy set up on Account Management success and Failure and I
have been getting records in the event log when user accounts lock out (a
644 event) and I still get them, but it seems to be a hit-or-miss thing
recently. If I weren't getting any, I would think the policy wasn't right,
but it's an intermittent issue. I know about the event log bug, and I
archive the logs with a VBscript every night so they don't get too big and
start dropping them, but there is at least one account, and probably more,
that is not recording the event of its locking out, and I need to see those
so I can inform the developer the originating machine name.
Any ideas? Tag: M'I`5'Perse cution wh y wo n't th e B ritish p olice do the ir job a nd put a st op to it? Tag: 176252
Migration from NT Mixed to 200 Native?
Hi, and sorry for the vague post, but I'm really only starting to get a
handle on things.
I've just become "the I.T. guy" at a company, and their directory system is
basically nonexistent right now. They upgraded from NT to 2K and a couple
of the five servers are 2K3 now. But I just realized they never fully
updated to a Win2K Native AD structure.
I'm wondering if there are any "gotcha" moments I need to check for before I
I make the decision about whether to upgrade the directory structure.
One complicating factor I've run into, although it may not *really* matter:
DHCP and DNS are run by our ISP. I do not have access to DNS records to see
if SRV records can be created/supported, and I know just enough about AD to
think this could be a problem.
Guidance? Ideas? Suggestions?
Whatever you can give would be greatly appreciated.
-RØß-
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com Tag: M'I`5'Perse cution wh y wo n't th e B ritish p olice do the ir job a nd put a st op to it? Tag: 176251
Install new font file
I need to install a praticular font file for our check printer on each local
workstation. The problem is one would need local admin right to do this and
the users do not have this right by default. Instead of having to be at each
physical computer is there another option via group policy or a script by
chance? Remote desktop is not possible since the workstations are windows
2000. Any advice is much apprecaited. Tag: M'I`5'Perse cution wh y wo n't th e B ritish p olice do the ir job a nd put a st op to it? Tag: 176247
Automate Install
I'm not sure where else to tuen on this one so I figured I 'd take a shote
posting the question here. An application we use we just updated to a new
version and it turns out this new version requires a new version of java. My
probelm is that the application automaticly pull down and trys to install
this newest version from the install source. The problem is that we do not
allow download rights or local administrative rights to our user base. This
presents a problem on how to deploy this to the user base without having to
individual install the application on each windows 2000 machine. I've
adverted the download right by making the server where the install source for
java is a trusted site and allowing downloads form the trusted site but can't
figure a way to solve the local admin rights issue. Any sugestions on this?
Is there a way to create a msi package for the java I need or automate the
install using some for of an answer file? Can I install through group policy
or a script? Tag: M'I`5'Perse cution wh y wo n't th e B ritish p olice do the ir job a nd put a st op to it? Tag: 176246
Lastlogon: Many DCs showing Identical Timestamp
I am using the "Additional Account Info" tab on the AD Users and Computers
GUI (acctinfo.dll) to compare Last Logon timestamp to the values that I get
using Vbscript's Get method, and GetEx method (e.g. set objLogon =
ousr.Get("lastLogon")). I am specifying a specific DC to query in the LDAP
path in the Vbscript. I noticed that many user accounts have the identical
timestamp on many DCs in the "Additional Account Info" tab on the DCs. How
can this be? Also, the results will always match the output from the Get
method, or the Getex method, but not both. There seems to be no pattern. Tag: M'I`5'Perse cution wh y wo n't th e B ritish p olice do the ir job a nd put a st op to it? Tag: 176243
DCdiag reports "missing expected value"
Hi,
Have an interesting AD query.
A genuis Help Desk support person added an XP pc to the domain with the same
name as a remote site server and this XP PC managed to take over the site DC
attributes i.e. FRS et al..
Using DCDIAG on one of my site servers (remote location WAN) reports the
following:
[1] Problem: Missing Expected Value
Base Object:
CN= GREENHUNDRED,OU=Domian Controllers,DC=apollo,DC=local
Base object Description: "DC Account Object"
Value Object Attribute Name: frsComputerReferenceBL
Value Object Description: "SYSVOL FRS Member Object"
See q312862
How can I remove/fix the error above?
Thanks.. Tag: M'I`5'Perse cution wh y wo n't th e B ritish p olice do the ir job a nd put a st op to it? Tag: 176242
Computer relationship to domain is lost
have 5 computers that keep losing their domain relationship everytime they
restart. Error message at logon is: 'Windows cannot connect to the domain,
either because the domain controller is down or otherwise unavailable, or
because your computer account was not found.'
When I remove the computer from the domain and re-add it then I can log in
with no problem until I log off again or restart the system then the same
error message comes up.
Client OS: WinXP SP2
Server OS: Windows Server 2003
Has any of you experienced this? I appreciate your help. Tag: M'I`5'Perse cution wh y wo n't th e B ritish p olice do the ir job a nd put a st op to it? Tag: 176239
Account Replication between two Different Active Directory Domains
I have an Active Directory Domain with 20,000 exchange mail user
accounts, called foo.edu. I would now like to create a second new
Active Directory Domain called school.edu and replicate foo.edu 20,000
exchange accounts to school.edu, to create a single sign on. Also
changes made in either Active Directory would need to be replicated to
the other Active Directory. Please help (Mike). Tag: M'I`5'Perse cution wh y wo n't th e B ritish p olice do the ir job a nd put a st op to it? Tag: 176236
create adm file
Hello,
we have problem with slow windows xp boot. I waits for the starting scripts.
There is a possibility to create a registry entry to set this process
assyncron.
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\policies\system]
"RunStartupScriptSync"=dword:00000000
The problem is I tried this to put in a policy using reg2adm. It looks good,
but with this policy it is not possible to set the value 0. Only 1 or
higher.
This is the result:
________________
CLASS MACHINE
CATEGORY "SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\policies\system"
KEYNAME "SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\policies\system"
POLICY "RunStartupScriptSync"
PART "RunStartupScriptSync"
NUMERIC
VALUENAME "RunStartupScriptSync"
END PART
END POLICY
END CATEGORY
_____________________
May someone has an idea?
Thanks in advance
Dirk Tag: M'I`5'Perse cution wh y wo n't th e B ritish p olice do the ir job a nd put a st op to it? Tag: 176233
AD replication issue
ok here is what happened...
in our remote datacenter, there was an electrical issue and lost power
everything came back up ok, but the 2 dc's there (2003 SP2) that are older
systems and the date reset to january 2002 (since fixed)
this is the cause of the event below. i'm trying to determine the best way
to resolve it.
at the same time, users are being prompted for credentials when getting
their mail.
not sure if exchange (2003 SP2) is affected by this or if it's a separate
issue
here is the event:
Event Type: Error
Event Source: NTDS Replication
Event Category: Replication
Event ID: 2042
Date: 12/11/2007
Time: 2:55:46 PM
User: NT AUTHORITY\ANONYMOUS LOGON
Computer: <computername>
Description:
It has been too long since this machine last replicated with the named
source machine. The time between replications with this source has exceeded
the tombstone lifetime. Replication has been stopped with this source.
The reason that replication is not allowed to continue is that the two
machine's views of deleted objects may now be different. The source machine
may still have copies of objects that have been deleted (and garbage
collected) on this machine. If they were allowed to replicate, the source
machine might return objects which have already been deleted.
Time of last successful replication:
2002-01-28 06:53:13
Invocation ID of source:
0478f6c8-f6b8-0478-0100-000000000000
Name of source:
8cf34e45-547f-48d8-9870-bc0d59d31827._msdcs.<domain>.com
Tombstone lifetime (days):
60
The replication operation has failed.
User Action:
Determine which of the two machines was disconnected from the forest and is
now out of date. You have three options:
1. Demote or reinstall the machine(s) that were disconnected.
2. Use the "repadmin /removelingeringobjects" tool to remove inconsistent
deleted objects and then resume replication.
3. Resume replication. Inconsistent deleted objects may be introduced. You
can continue replication by using the following registry key. Once the
systems replicate once, it is recommended that you remove the key to
reinstate the protection.
Registry Key:
HKLM\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\NTDS\Parameters\Allow Replication
With Divergent and Corrupt Partner
For more information, see Help and Support Center at
http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp. Tag: M'I`5'Perse cution wh y wo n't th e B ritish p olice do the ir job a nd put a st op to it? Tag: 176226
Implementing an approval workflow for delegating administration
I'm looking for a solution to provide an approval process and audit
tracking for a delegated OU.
The scenario is:
- client submits request for access change.
- their manager approves
- application owner approves
- system implements the approved changes and logs who approved, what
change, and when.
Anyone know of a product or preferably open source project providing
this functionality? Tag: M'I`5'Perse cution wh y wo n't th e B ritish p olice do the ir job a nd put a st op to it? Tag: 176225
Bulk Import from Lotus
Hi,
I'll try to expose you our situation:
We have a native 2003 forest with one domain. Our main LDAP structure is
a Lotus Domino Server 7.x that contains all relevant data from company
users. We need to import some imperative users fields from Lotus to
Active Directory users.
Then we have some restrictions. In active Lotus there are a lot of users
that don't match with Active Directory and also there are some users
that don't exists in AD, then we have not to import lotus users fields
to AD users fields.
Is there any utilty to make easier this procedure?. May I script in anyway?.
Thanks in advance.
Regards. Tag: M'I`5'Perse cution wh y wo n't th e B ritish p olice do the ir job a nd put a st op to it? Tag: 176215
Sysvol location
I have a Windows 2003 domain. When I do a dfsutil /pktinfo the list of
domain controllers for the sysvol referral do not have the same site DCs
listed first. Should they be? Tag: M'I`5'Perse cution wh y wo n't th e B ritish p olice do the ir job a nd put a st op to it? Tag: 176214
Telephone section not visible via SEARCH, FOR PEOPLE
I am using Window XP, on START, SEARCH, FOR PEOPLE, it only show some
of the Active Directory information.
Are there anyway to show the TELEPHONE section of Active Directory and
allow me to update the 'mobile phone' information ?
I am expecting the telephone information will flow onto Exchange which
when I pull up the GAL, mobile phone information will be there
eventually.
Any comment and advice most appreciated. KL Tag: M'I`5'Perse cution wh y wo n't th e B ritish p olice do the ir job a nd put a st op to it? Tag: 176213
Error in LDAP Service. Help!
Two messages are reported in the Event Viewer when I reboot my W2K Server:
1. The server failed to start due to an initialization error. Verify the
configuration. Error description is: GetLastError()=997 : CreateAccount for
Anonymous users.
2. Site Server LDAP Service cannot initialize the following object:
GetLastError()=997 : Init LdapExtension.
Then, the NetLogong service does not start automaticaly.
Anyone can help?
Thanks much,
Leonardo Tag: M'I`5'Perse cution wh y wo n't th e B ritish p olice do the ir job a nd put a st op to it? Tag: 176209
Security Group not giving users access
Here is my basic setup...
I have a folder created for all departments in my organization. These
folders are not shared. I have created a security group named after the
folder. (ex. sales folder access) I then give full rights to this security
group. I then place users in the group.
For some reason this does not give them access to the folder. I have to
give each user rights to the folder before it will work.
Any ideas? Tag: M'I`5'Perse cution wh y wo n't th e B ritish p olice do the ir job a nd put a st op to it? Tag: 176202
Default Access Permissions to Active Directory
All, what is the default permission to active directory or where can I look
to find? Right now, any and all people in our IT Department can access
Access Directory after installing the Admin Pak.
Your help is appreciated. Tag: M'I`5'Perse cution wh y wo n't th e B ritish p olice do the ir job a nd put a st op to it? Tag: 176201
DC Restore
I had a problem about 2 weeks ago. I had 2 of 4 hard drives fail on my RAID
5 volume. I also did not have any spares for replacement so I had to wait a
few days. The server is a second DC in this building, but one of 5 in my
enviroment. I had decent backups of the server.
When I recieved the drives I installed them, installed Windows 2000 Server
and then did a restore from tape. This was at least 5 days after the
failure. Now that the server is restored I have issues with clients
connecting to shares regarding authentication. I have loads of errors in the
event log regardign directory communication.
I have tried doing a dcpromo and the authentication fails there as well. Is
there something that I can do to resolve this issue? Tag: M'I`5'Perse cution wh y wo n't th e B ritish p olice do the ir job a nd put a st op to it? Tag: 176200
Pls help!! Problem of Rebuilding indices of Active Didectory
Hi all
I have a problem after installed SP2 for Windows server 2003, it always
prompt "The Active directory is rebuilding indices" too long time when
server starting up and show "SAM failed start the to TCP/IP or SPX/IPX
litening thread" in system log. And I cannot ping this server from other PC
and can ping other PC on this server, Anyone can tell me why and how to
fixed it? thx very much for helping.
Rgds
Alan Tag: M'I`5'Perse cution wh y wo n't th e B ritish p olice do the ir job a nd put a st op to it? Tag: 176190
Search Distribution list owner
Hi,
We have a situation where one of the users have left the organisation
and he used to be the manager for quite a number of Distribution lists.
These distribution lists are part of different OUs, and we do not have a
master list of the DLs he owned. Now, we would need to find out the
diffferent DLs that he was the owner of and get that changed to a
different owner.
The challenge here is, there are close to 10000 DLs across the company
and to make things worse, this employees account has now been deleted
from AD.
Thanks,
Jai
--
cooljai
------------------------------------------------------------------------
cooljai's Profile: http://forums.techarena.in/member.php?userid=36607
View this thread: http://forums.techarena.in/showthread.php?t=865411
http://forums.techarena.in Tag: M'I`5'Perse cution wh y wo n't th e B ritish p olice do the ir job a nd put a st op to it? Tag: 176189
Add New Computer Object With VBS
Hey All!
When creating a new computer object, we change the 'users/group can
join this computer to a domain' option from 'Domain Admins' to
'Authenticated Users'.
I'm trying to accomplish it with a script as shown below. If I leave
out the defaultgroup line, the object gets created. When run with the
defaultgroup I get an error - a constraint violation occurred. Am I
using the correct attribute ('defaultGroup') to accomplish this and if
so how do I fix it? If not, which attribute do I use?
Thanks
GHG
Set objComputer = objContainer.Create("Computer", "cn=" &
strComputer)
objComputer.Put "sAMAccountName", strComputer & "$"
objComputer.Put "Description", strDescription
>> objComputer.Put "defaultGroup", "Authenticated Users" <<
objComputer.Put "userAccountControl", 4096
objComputer.SetInfo Tag: M'I`5'Perse cution wh y wo n't th e B ritish p olice do the ir job a nd put a st op to it? Tag: 176183
Possible breach
Is there a way to see if someone added a user account to our active
directory that dows not show in ADUC? Tag: M'I`5'Perse cution wh y wo n't th e B ritish p olice do the ir job a nd put a