Paul
Wed Mar 26 05:50:55 PDT 2008
We own a class B so we have the first two octets as all the same and we
allow the system to create the third octet for us and that works perfectly
fine. Not sure if this is a good or bad thing but would assume this is an
ok practice. I have never seen any info against it.
So if you create a single octet reverse zone the system will create the
folders for you of each subnet.
--
Paul Bergson
MVP - Directory Services
MCT, MCSE, MCSA, Security+, BS CSci
2008, 2003, 2000 (Early Achiever), NT4
http://www.pbbergs.com
Please no e-mails, any questions should be posted in the NewsGroup
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
"JayDee" <dopamine@mail.com> wrote in message
news:462ae412-6522-46bd-b514-826ca1101050@u10g2000prn.googlegroups.com...
> Hi! Our AD has about 26,000 computers. Right now we've got a messy mix
> of Class B and Class C reverse-lookup zones that I want to clean up.
> At first I was considering changing them all to class B's and getting
> rid of the Class C's, but then I was thinking....
>
> what about creating one giant Class A reverse-lookup zone? The entire
> network is on the same first octet, and none of the addresses are
> routable on the internet, so in essence we own the entire class A
> range.
>
> Thanks for your opinions...
>
> - JayDee