We are due to merge with a another company, and due to us having a
more complex AD structure we are bringing the new domain into our AD.

We want to try and hide our domain.com from the end users of the new
company and ours and show a newdom.com (its a bit sensitive as the CEO
does not want the users to feel that they now all belong to old
domain.com).
I have created a new Domain suffix newdom.com so new and migrated
users have this account, but on its own this is not enough.

is there a way to alias the domain, i did hear about a dname in DNS,
but cannot find an real info or if it will hide or alias my existing
domain.

There are other complications in the form of an extensive DFS
namespace but i will post that in the relevant group, but i need
something that will also alias the DFS.

regards

Phil

Re: Hiding the domain name from new company by Ace

Ace
Sat Jun 14 10:07:48 PDT 2008

In news:20a609e8-8fff-42df-9fd6-ed1dcb116328@z72g2000hsb.googlegroups.com,
durx <phil.durkin@work-inc.com> typed:
> We are due to merge with a another company, and due to us having a
> more complex AD structure we are bringing the new domain into our AD.
>
> We want to try and hide our domain.com from the end users of the new
> company and ours and show a newdom.com (its a bit sensitive as the CEO
> does not want the users to feel that they now all belong to old
> domain.com).
> I have created a new Domain suffix newdom.com so new and migrated
> users have this account, but on its own this is not enough.
>
> is there a way to alias the domain, i did hear about a dname in DNS,
> but cannot find an real info or if it will hide or alias my existing
> domain.
>
> There are other complications in the form of an extensive DFS
> namespace but i will post that in the relevant group, but i need
> something that will also alias the DFS.
>
> regards
>
> Phil

What exactly do you mean by "brining the new domain into our AD?" Are you
going to migrate their domain into a new child domain in your existing
forest?

DNS CNAMES, is what you are probably referring to, is problematic with AD
SRV records. Even with DFS. DFS uses the DNS hostname LdapIpAddress
reference, which would be in a single domain environment, the domain name or
'domain.com' to connect by. If a child domain, such as if you were to
migrate their domain into a child domain, would be "newdomain.domain.com,"
if that makes sense.

Assuming you want to migrate the other company's domain into your forest, it
will not really be possible to hide your infrastructure. Remember, and also
assuming if you say your infrastructure is that much more complex and
probably multi-site, you have WINS running and that allow your domain to
show up in the neighborhood.

A new suffix will allow them to logon on with that sufffix using the UPN
method, and once again I'm assuming a migration, but if they logon with the
standard 3-line method (username, password and drop-down box for the NetBIOS
domain name) all trusted domains will show up in the drop-down domain box.

If Exchange is in use, when a user looks up another person's properties of
their GAL entry, they can see the old domain name. There's really no way to
hide that. I mean you can change everyone's email suffix too, but then you
still need to have the old one in place so as to receive mail from business
partners and customers to their old email addresses.

Why not just build a whole new domain and migrate everything into it? That
will clean up everything.

Many companies merge and don't try to hide the old domain. It's just a fact
of life in the corporate world when mergers or takeovers occur. I have two
customers that went thru a merger and one that took over another company. In
that latter, they just merged them in. I taught the IT staff how to teach
their folks to logon to the new domain, but they kept their old email
addresses and taught them how their reply-to will change to the new company.
It's not like the old or new folks don't know about it, you have to give
them credit for their intelligence. Nor does it really affect them either
way other than complicate matters for your IT staff when trying to alter
default AD functionality and making it more difficult when supporting issues
that arise from it.

Maybe you can elaborate a bit more in reference to our discussion on your
current environment and clear up my assumptions and statements, please? It's
difficult to assist with limited information and I'm going by what you
posted.


--
Regards,
Ace

This posting is provided "AS-IS" with no warranties or guarantees and
confers no rights.

Ace Fekay, MCSE 2003 & 2000, MCSA 2003 & 2000, MCSE+I, MCT,
MVP Microsoft MVP - Directory Services
Microsoft Certified Trainer

For urgent issues, you may want to contact Microsoft PSS directly. Please
check http://support.microsoft.com for regional support phone numbers.

Infinite Diversities in Infinite Combinations



Re: Hiding the domain name from new company by durx

durx
Mon Jun 16 04:25:08 PDT 2008

Thanks for the replay Ace.
The reason we dont want to rebuild a new domain is that we have some
3rd party apps that are linked to our domain name and would take
extensive work to have them migrated, plus our financial service are
licensed and built around the domain name not to mention Citrix and
the whole pain of a multi site DFS.

We decided the easiest way was to only rebuild 1 single side of the
merge and bring all of their servers and services into our domain, but
not as a child domain.

Both companies use exchange, and they have 4 exchange servers, we have
3 to consider.

Phil

On 14 Jun, 18:07, "Ace Fekay [MVP]" <PleaseAs...@SomeDomain.com>
wrote:
> Innews:20a609e8-8fff-42df-9fd6-ed1dcb116328@z72g2000hsb.googlegroups.com,durx<phil.dur...@work-inc.com> typed:
>
>
>
>
>
> > We are due to merge with a another company, and due to us having a
> > more complex AD structure we are bringing the new domain into our AD.
>
> > We want to try and hide our domain.com from the end users of the new
> > company and ours and show a newdom.com (its a bit sensitive as the CEO
> > does not want the users to feel that they now all belong to old
> > domain.com).
> > I have created a new Domain suffix newdom.com so new and migrated
> > users have this account, but on its own this is not enough.
>
> > is there a way to alias the domain, i did hear about a dname in DNS,
> > but cannot find an real info or if it will hide or alias my existing
> > domain.
>
> > There are other complications in the form of an extensive DFS
> > namespace but i will post that in the relevant group, but i need
> > something that will also alias the DFS.
>
> > regards
>
> > Phil
>
> What exactly do you mean by "brining the new domain into our AD?" Are you
> going to migrate their domain into a new child domain in your existing
> forest?
>
> DNS CNAMES, is what you are probably referring to, is problematic with AD
> SRV records. Even with DFS. DFS uses the DNS hostname LdapIpAddress
> reference, which would be in a single domain environment, the domain name or
> 'domain.com' to connect by. If a child domain, such as if you were to
> migrate their domain into a child domain, would be "newdomain.domain.com,"
> if that makes sense.
>
> Assuming you want to migrate the other company's domain into your forest, it
> will not really be possible to hide your infrastructure. Remember, and also
> assuming if you say your infrastructure is that much more complex and
> probably multi-site, you have WINS running and that allow your domain to
> show up in the neighborhood.
>
> A new suffix will allow them to logon on with that sufffix using the UPN
> method, and once again I'm assuming a migration, but if they logon with the
> standard 3-line method (username, password and drop-down box for the NetBIOS
> domain name) all trusted domains will show up in the drop-down domain box.
>
> If Exchange is in use, when a user looks up another person's properties of
> their GAL entry, they can see the old domain name. There's really no way to
> hide that. I mean you can change everyone's email suffix too, but then you
> still need to have the old one in place so as to receive mail from business
> partners and customers to their old email addresses.
>
> Why not just build a whole new domain and migrate everything into it? That
> will clean up everything.
>
> Many companies merge and don't try to hide the old domain. It's just a fact
> of life in the corporate world when mergers or takeovers occur. I have two
> customers that went thru a merger and one that took over another company. In
> that latter, they just merged them in. I taught the IT staff how to teach
> their folks to logon to the new domain, but they kept their old email
> addresses and taught them how their reply-to will change to the new company.
> It's not like the old or new folks don't know about it, you have to give
> them credit for their intelligence. Nor does it really affect them either
> way other than complicate matters for your IT staff when trying to alter
> default AD functionality and making it more difficult when supporting issues
> that arise from it.
>
> Maybe you can elaborate a bit more in reference to our discussion on your
> current environment and clear up my assumptions and statements, please? It's
> difficult to assist with limited information and I'm going by what you
> posted.
>
> --
> Regards,
> Ace
>
> This posting is provided "AS-IS" with no warranties or guarantees and
> confers no rights.
>
> Ace Fekay, MCSE 2003 & 2000, MCSA 2003 & 2000, MCSE+I, MCT,
> MVP Microsoft MVP - Directory Services
> Microsoft Certified Trainer
>
> For urgent issues, you may want to contact Microsoft PSS directly. Please
> checkhttp://support.microsoft.comfor regional support phone numbers.
>
> Infinite Diversities in Infinite Combinations- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -


Re: Hiding the domain name from new company by Ace

Ace
Tue Jun 17 21:19:29 PDT 2008

In news:e2e9db70-5c4c-4984-b166-93f214c0d423@34g2000hsf.googlegroups.com,
durx <phil.durkin@work-inc.com> typed:
> Thanks for the replay Ace.
> The reason we dont want to rebuild a new domain is that we have some
> 3rd party apps that are linked to our domain name and would take
> extensive work to have them migrated, plus our financial service are
> licensed and built around the domain name not to mention Citrix and
> the whole pain of a multi site DFS.
>
> We decided the easiest way was to only rebuild 1 single side of the
> merge and bring all of their servers and services into our domain, but
> not as a child domain.
>
> Both companies use exchange, and they have 4 exchange servers, we have
> 3 to consider.
>
> Phil

You have an extensive infrastructure. At least you found a way to make it a
bit easier for you. As for Exchange, when you migrate the users using ADMT,
it will preserve their logon names as long as there are no dupes in the
target (your) domain. While having a two-way trust, use ADMT's SIDHistory
feature. This way they can still access their old domain's resources. Even
mailboxes. As for Exchange, simply mailbox enable the new migrated accounts
and use ExMerge's two-step method. Pump out their original mailboxes into
PSTs, which will automatically be named based on their alias. Then pump them
into their new mailboxes. Before mailbox enabling the, and during
transition, I assume you will do them in blocks of users instead of the
whole company at once. While transitioning, they can still access their old
email. WHen you plan on running ExMerge, while after hours, mailbox enable
them and import the PSTs into them.

I hope that makes sense.

Ace



Re: Hiding the domain name from new company by durx

durx
Wed Jun 18 02:34:21 PDT 2008

On Jun 18, 5:19=A0am, "Ace Fekay [MVP]" <PleaseAs...@SomeDomain.com>
wrote:
> Innews:e2e9db70-5c4c-4984-b166-93f214c0d423@34g2000hsf.googlegroups.com,
> durx <phil.dur...@work-inc.com> typed:
>
> > Thanks for the replay Ace.
> > The reason we dont want to rebuild a new domain is that we have some
> > 3rd party apps that are linked to our domain name and would take
> > extensive work to have them migrated, plus our financial service are
> > licensed and built around the domain name not to mention Citrix and
> > the whole pain of a multi site DFS.
>
> > We decided the easiest way was to only rebuild 1 single side of the
> > merge and bring all of their servers and services into our domain, but
> > not as a child domain.
>
> > Both companies use exchange, and they have 4 exchange servers, we have
> > 3 to consider.
>
> > Phil
>
> You have an extensive infrastructure. At least you found a way to make it=
a
> bit easier for you. As for Exchange, when you migrate the users using ADM=
T,
> it will preserve their logon names as long as there are no dupes in the
> target (your) domain. While having a two-way trust, use ADMT's SIDHistory
> feature. This way they can still access their old domain's resources. Eve=
n
> mailboxes. As for Exchange, simply mailbox enable the new migrated accoun=
ts
> and use ExMerge's two-step method. Pump out their original mailboxes into
> PSTs, which will automatically be named based on their alias. Then pump t=
hem
> into their new mailboxes. Before mailbox enabling the, and during
> transition, I assume you will do them in blocks of users instead of the
> whole company at once. While transitioning, they can still access their o=
ld
> email. WHen you plan on running ExMerge, while after hours, mailbox enabl=
e
> them and import the PSTs into them.
>
> I hope that makes sense.
>
> Ace

Ace,

Yeah we went through a similiar thing 18 months ago when we aquired a
previous company. That was easy as we removced the old domain, this
time we intend to keep our domin but hide the more in your face
branding.

Is there a way to authenticate against a domain suffix for Outlook
over RPC, or are we simply stuck with the true domain name?

Phil

Re: Hiding the domain name from new company by Ace

Ace
Wed Jun 18 04:16:56 PDT 2008

In news:5bd90e57-10a5-4440-aec6-d53110b90a16@f36g2000hsa.googlegroups.com,
durx <phil.durkin@work-inc.com> typed:
> Ace,
>
> Yeah we went through a similiar thing 18 months ago when we aquired a
> previous company. That was easy as we removced the old domain, this
> time we intend to keep our domin but hide the more in your face
> branding.
>
> Is there a way to authenticate against a domain suffix for Outlook
> over RPC, or are we simply stuck with the true domain name?
>
> Phil

Migrations/acquisitions are fun! <grin>

No, not that I ever tested, tried or believe a suffix will work. But you can
try. I mean normally we have users logon based on their logged on account,
and if the machine is not joined and they're connecting as someone else,
usually show them to logon on as domain\user. You can try an alternate
suffixe with the UPN method. Let me know if it works.

Ace





Re: Hiding the domain name from new company by durx

durx
Mon Jun 23 01:07:01 PDT 2008

logging on as domain-suffix\username didnt work.

unless some guru finds a way to create a working alias for a domain,
then i guess we are stuck displaying the domain name.
Me thinks the new CEO may not be too impressed.

cheers


On Jun 18, 12:16=A0pm, "Ace Fekay [MVP]" <PleaseAs...@SomeDomain.com>
wrote:
> Innews:5bd90e57-10a5-4440-aec6-d53110b90a16@f36g2000hsa.googlegroups.com,=
durx<phil.dur...@work-inc.com> typed:
>
> > Ace,
>
> > Yeah we went through a similiar thing 18 months ago when we aquired a
> > previous company. That was easy as we removced the old domain, this
> > time we intend to keep our domin but hide the more in your face
> > branding.
>
> > Is there a way to authenticate against a domain suffix for Outlook
> > over RPC, or are we simply stuck with the true domain name?
>
> > Phil
>
> Migrations/acquisitions are fun! <grin>
>
> No, not that I ever tested, tried or believe a suffix will work. But you =
can
> try. I mean normally we have users logon based on their logged on account=
,
> and if the machine is not joined and they're connecting as someone else,
> usually show them to logon on as domain\user. You can try an alternate
> suffixe with the UPN method. Let me know if it works.
>
> Ace


Re: Hiding the domain name from new company by Ace

Ace
Thu Jul 03 20:36:57 PDT 2008

In news:663a967e-7e3f-4441-8418-fbbd89df4429@s50g2000hsb.googlegroups.com,
durx <phil.durkin@work-inc.com> typed:
> logging on as domain-suffix\username didnt work.
>
> unless some guru finds a way to create a working alias for a domain,
> then i guess we are stuck displaying the domain name.
> Me thinks the new CEO may not be too impressed.
>
> cheers

Sorry for the late response. Had some hardware issues.

I meant to try adding an additional suffix under AD and have them logon as
the suffix using the UPN format, such as user@newsuffix.com. Using the
legacy newsuffix\user methodwill not work with additional suffixes. Please
keep in mind, it's a DNS suffix.

As for the drop-down box using the legacy method, you can't hide any domains
that are trusted. They all simply show up. Sorry...

Ace