Paul
Fri Sep 05 06:54:30 PDT 2008
Correct, but if it is only a dc I would just clean up and repromote.
Restores are a hassle.
--
Paul Bergson
MVP - Directory Services
MCTS, MCT, MCSE, MCSA, Security+, BS CSci
2008, 2003, 2000 (Early Achiever), NT4
http://www.pbbergs.com
Please no e-mails, any questions should be posted in the NewsGroup
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
"Phillip Windell" <philwindell@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:%23hWdmr1DJHA.448@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
> "Paul Bergson [MVP-DS]" <pbergson@allete_nospam.com> wrote in message
> news:us2jkK1DJHA.4976@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>> You can't just name a dc the same and expect it to still work. You need
>> to either do a full restore from backup or do a metadata cleanup. I
>> would do the metadata cleanup and then repromote a new dc and you can
>> name the repromoted dc the same name. I always change the name
>> (Increment the count on the end of the name) but keep the ip address the
>> same.
>
> Yea, I knew that building a machine with the same name is still a
> different machine,...I just wasn't sure about the Metadata side of things
> if the new DC had the same name in the end when finished. So I was hoping
> someone would clarify that.
>
> Now if you restore one from tape using active directory restore mode it
> would be the "same machine",...then there would not be anything to clean
> up? You'd just have to wait for AD Replication to catch up as the DC with
> the authortiative copy of AD refreshes the non-authoritative copy on the
> one resotred?
> --
> Phillip Windell
> www.wandtv.com
>
> The views expressed, are my own and not those of my employer, or
> Microsoft,
> or anyone else associated with me, including my cats.
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>