Paul
Wed Aug 13 15:27:04 PDT 2008
To add, it is always much cleaner to add new as opposed to upgrading a box.
A lot of old history goes along with an upgrade. I never upgrade I always
do a new install.
--
Paul Bergson
MVP - Directory Services
MCTS, MCT, MCSE, MCSA, Security+, BS CSci
2008, 2003, 2000 (Early Achiever), NT4
http://www.pbbergs.com
Please no e-mails, any questions should be posted in the NewsGroup
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
"Meinolf Weber" <meiweb(nospam)@gmx.de> wrote in message
news:ff16fb66a65438cacb443c1f48d6@msnews.microsoft.com...
> Hello Yann,
>
> Result at the end will be the same. Do not forget the Global catalog
> checkmark and also make it DNS, best option are Active directory
> integrated zones for DNS. Also reconfigure the clients for the new DNS
> server.
>
> Best regards
>
> Meinolf Weber
> Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and
> confers no rights.
> ** Please do NOT email, only reply to Newsgroups
> ** HELP us help YOU!!!
http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/mul_crss.htm
>
>> I am currently running all my DC with W2000. I want to replace them by
>> new
>> servers running W2003 and therefore need to upgrade my AD to W2003.
>> According to a book and articles I read until now, it seems I have 2
>> solutions to upgrade my AD:
>> 1) In place upgrade : upgrade my current DC which holds FSMO roles and
>> is
>> currently running W2000 to W2003, but this is not the best for me as I
>> want
>> to replace my old servers
>> 2) Clean and Pristine migration : create a new domain on a new W2003
>> server
>> and migrate my resources : a lot of work
>> I was wondering is the following procedure wouldn't upgrade my AD to
>> W2003
>> too:
>> Introduce a new W2003 member server in the domain, run W2003 forest
>> prep and
>> domain prep, promote the new W2003 server as DC, move the FSMO roles
>> to this
>> new server.
>> Will the result be different from in place upgrade?
>> Thank you for your help
>>
>
>