MS draws 64-bit line in the sand...

Tutorials Win: Microsoft Windows Forum

http://www.windowsitpro.com/Article/ArticleID/48600/48600.html
Top

Re: MS draws 64-bit line in the sand... by Andre

Andre
Wed Nov 30 11:10:24 CST 2005

"Longhorn Server Release 2 (R2), due in 2007"

Wrong, Longhorn Server R2 is not expected until 2009, the initial release of
LH Server, will be released in '07.

I see many Companies still on 32 bit Windows Server and client in 2012 and
beyond, look at Windows 2000, released 5 years ago and still going strong.
--
Andre
Extended64 | http://www.extended64.com
Blog | http://www.extended64.com/blogs/andre
http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta
FAQ for MS AntiSpy http://www.geocities.com/marfer_mvp/FAQ_MSantispy.htm


"M. Murcek" <mamurcekjr@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:%2311Vvxc9FHA.1440@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> http://www.windowsitpro.com/Article/ArticleID/48600/48600.html
>


Top

Re: MS draws 64-bit line in the sand... by M

M
Wed Nov 30 11:33:32 CST 2005

I think the main thing is, for users who need the high I/O throughput, x64
Edition makes sense. Also, nobody's going to stop wanting more security,
more reliability, and a bifurcated code base just makes that harder. This
is a replay, in some respects of the shift from 16 to 32 bits, but I think
it's going to happen faster, and Microsoft's pronouncements seem to support
that estimate...

"Andre Da Costa [Extended64]" <andred25@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:uFJ51Dd9FHA.1420@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> "Longhorn Server Release 2 (R2), due in 2007"
>
> Wrong, Longhorn Server R2 is not expected until 2009, the initial release
> of LH Server, will be released in '07.
>
> I see many Companies still on 32 bit Windows Server and client in 2012 and
> beyond, look at Windows 2000, released 5 years ago and still going strong.
> --
> Andre
> Extended64 | http://www.extended64.com
> Blog | http://www.extended64.com/blogs/andre
> http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta
> FAQ for MS AntiSpy http://www.geocities.com/marfer_mvp/FAQ_MSantispy.htm
>
>
> "M. Murcek" <mamurcekjr@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
> news:%2311Vvxc9FHA.1440@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
>> http://www.windowsitpro.com/Article/ArticleID/48600/48600.html
>>
>
>


Top

Re: MS draws 64-bit line in the sand... by Ted

Ted
Wed Nov 30 16:21:06 CST 2005

Aren't MS shooting their foot for current server sales ?


"M. Murcek" <mamurcekjr@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:O0oGhQd9FHA.3660@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
>I think the main thing is, for users who need the high I/O throughput, x64
>Edition makes sense. Also, nobody's going to stop wanting more security,
>more reliability, and a bifurcated code base just makes that harder. This
>is a replay, in some respects of the shift from 16 to 32 bits, but I think
>it's going to happen faster, and Microsoft's pronouncements seem to support
>that estimate...
>
> "Andre Da Costa [Extended64]" <andred25@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:uFJ51Dd9FHA.1420@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
>> "Longhorn Server Release 2 (R2), due in 2007"
>>
>> Wrong, Longhorn Server R2 is not expected until 2009, the initial release
>> of LH Server, will be released in '07.
>>
>> I see many Companies still on 32 bit Windows Server and client in 2012
>> and beyond, look at Windows 2000, released 5 years ago and still going
>> strong.
>> --
>> Andre
>> Extended64 | http://www.extended64.com
>> Blog | http://www.extended64.com/blogs/andre
>> http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta
>> FAQ for MS AntiSpy http://www.geocities.com/marfer_mvp/FAQ_MSantispy.htm
>>
>>
>> "M. Murcek" <mamurcekjr@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
>> news:%2311Vvxc9FHA.1440@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
>>> http://www.windowsitpro.com/Article/ArticleID/48600/48600.html
>>>
>>
>>
>
>


Top

Re: MS draws 64-bit line in the sand... by Andre

Andre
Wed Nov 30 16:46:39 CST 2005

Well, you want be seeing an Exchange 64 bit until 2007 including other
products like Centro, so it will give them time to think about their
decision and make changes if necessary. Testers will also receive both
32-bit and 64-bit Exchange 12, to make a comparison for themselves to find
out if the benefits of a exclusive 64-bit Exchange Server is necessary.
--
Andre
Extended64 | http://www.extended64.com
Blog | http://www.extended64.com/blogs/andre
http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta
FAQ for MS AntiSpy http://www.geocities.com/marfer_mvp/FAQ_MSantispy.htm

"Ted" <2000@xxxmsn.com> wrote in message
news:uG9dcxf9FHA.1484@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> Aren't MS shooting their foot for current server sales ?
>
>
> "M. Murcek" <mamurcekjr@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
> news:O0oGhQd9FHA.3660@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
>>I think the main thing is, for users who need the high I/O throughput, x64
>>Edition makes sense. Also, nobody's going to stop wanting more security,
>>more reliability, and a bifurcated code base just makes that harder. This
>>is a replay, in some respects of the shift from 16 to 32 bits, but I think
>>it's going to happen faster, and Microsoft's pronouncements seem to
>>support that estimate...
>>
>> "Andre Da Costa [Extended64]" <andred25@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:uFJ51Dd9FHA.1420@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
>>> "Longhorn Server Release 2 (R2), due in 2007"
>>>
>>> Wrong, Longhorn Server R2 is not expected until 2009, the initial
>>> release of LH Server, will be released in '07.
>>>
>>> I see many Companies still on 32 bit Windows Server and client in 2012
>>> and beyond, look at Windows 2000, released 5 years ago and still going
>>> strong.
>>> --
>>> Andre
>>> Extended64 | http://www.extended64.com
>>> Blog | http://www.extended64.com/blogs/andre
>>> http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta
>>> FAQ for MS AntiSpy http://www.geocities.com/marfer_mvp/FAQ_MSantispy.htm
>>>
>>>
>>> "M. Murcek" <mamurcekjr@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
>>> news:%2311Vvxc9FHA.1440@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
>>>> http://www.windowsitpro.com/Article/ArticleID/48600/48600.html
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>


Top