Darrellg
Thu Jun 14 19:23:56 CDT 2007
Hello David,
It will default to 64-bit.
To run the 32-bit mmc, use %windir%\syswow64\mmc.exe to start it.
Thanks,
Darrell Gorter[MSFT]
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights
--------------------
|> Thread-Topic: adminpak 2003 on Vista 64
|> thread-index: AceuutHrHhOx/JWaTLGBRTp5+DLQhQ==
|> X-WBNR-Posting-Host: 208.5.204.42
|> From: =?Utf-8?B?RGF2aWQgSA==?= <DavidH@discussions.microsoft.com>
|> References: <0D616935-2A6F-4D39-92F4-7661485FCF78@microsoft.com>
<B9E656AB-1843-423F-8C6F-3DF44C688B3A@microsoft.com>
<9721EFEE-D083-4EC9-B30E-6C34C1658CCB@microsoft.com>
<AgE8kNgqHHA.2304@TK2MSFTNGHUB02.phx.gbl>
<86C6FF5D-70EA-462E-B9D0-86E3C89346D9@microsoft.com>
<vo#zV5FrHHA.1540@TK2MSFTNGHUB02.phx.gbl>
<A6087B56-2294-4A02-B41B-2CC4445C0926@microsoft.com>
<33JQWirrHHA.3656@TK2MSFTNGHUB02.phx.gbl>
|> Subject: Re: adminpak 2003 on Vista 64
|> Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 12:33:01 -0700
|> Lines: 229
|> Message-ID: <E1EDD094-4AB0-41FA-BFE3-1EB0AF36C27D@microsoft.com>
|> MIME-Version: 1.0
|> Content-Type: text/plain;
|> charset="Utf-8"
|> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
|> X-Newsreader: Microsoft CDO for Windows 2000
|> Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
|> Importance: normal
|> Priority: normal
|> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.2826
|> Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windows.64bit.general
|> Path: TK2MSFTNGHUB02.phx.gbl
|> Xref: TK2MSFTNGHUB02.phx.gbl microsoft.public.windows.64bit.general:7368
|> NNTP-Posting-Host: tk2msftibfm01.phx.gbl 10.40.244.149
|> X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.windows.64bit.general
|>
|> Hello Darrell,
|> First of all thanks so much for all your help with this.
|> hmm... well I guess I don't really know. I just punch in mmc from the
start
|> box in Vista Ultimate 64. Which would that be? and how can I start one
or the
|> other?
|> Thanks again,
|> David
|>
|> ""Darrell Gorter[MSFT]"" wrote:
|>
|> > Hello David,
|> > Which platform of MMC.exe are you using?
|> > There should be a 32-bit and 64-bit MMC.exe and depending on whether
the
|> > snap-in is 32-bit or 64-bit, will limit what is displayed
|> > Thanks,
|> > Darrell Gorter[MSFT]
|> >
|> > This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights
|> > --------------------
|> > |> Thread-Topic: adminpak 2003 on Vista 64
|> > |> thread-index: AcetvoZ7smXyDRIqQ7+fmGpL7mb+lA==
|> > |> X-WBNR-Posting-Host: 208.5.204.42
|> > |> From: =?Utf-8?B?RGF2aWQgSA==?= <DavidH@discussions.microsoft.com>
|> > |> References: <0D616935-2A6F-4D39-92F4-7661485FCF78@microsoft.com>
|> > <B9E656AB-1843-423F-8C6F-3DF44C688B3A@microsoft.com>
|> > <9721EFEE-D083-4EC9-B30E-6C34C1658CCB@microsoft.com>
|> > <AgE8kNgqHHA.2304@TK2MSFTNGHUB02.phx.gbl>
|> > <86C6FF5D-70EA-462E-B9D0-86E3C89346D9@microsoft.com>
|> > <vo#zV5FrHHA.1540@TK2MSFTNGHUB02.phx.gbl>
|> > |> Subject: Re: adminpak 2003 on Vista 64
|> > |> Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 06:27:01 -0700
|> > |> Lines: 155
|> > |> Message-ID: <A6087B56-2294-4A02-B41B-2CC4445C0926@microsoft.com>
|> > |> MIME-Version: 1.0
|> > |> Content-Type: text/plain;
|> > |> charset="Utf-8"
|> > |> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
|> > |> X-Newsreader: Microsoft CDO for Windows 2000
|> > |> Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
|> > |> Importance: normal
|> > |> Priority: normal
|> > |> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.2826
|> > |> Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windows.64bit.general
|> > |> Path: TK2MSFTNGHUB02.phx.gbl
|> > |> Xref: TK2MSFTNGHUB02.phx.gbl
microsoft.public.windows.64bit.general:7342
|> > |> NNTP-Posting-Host: tk2msftibfm01.phx.gbl 10.40.244.149
|> > |> X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.windows.64bit.general
|> > |>
|> > |> that worked!
|> > |>
|> > |> Another related question: I want to add AD computer and users to a
|> > custom
|> > |> mmc along with DFS Namespace and several other tools I use. But
when I
|> > choose
|> > |> add/remove snap in's from the file pull down menu I do not see any
of
|> > these
|> > |> as a choice. How do add these to a custom .mmc?
|> > |>
|> > |> Thanks,
|> > |> David
|> > |>
|> > |>
|> > |> ""Darrell Gorter[MSFT]"" wrote:
|> > |>
|> > |> > Hello David
|> > |> > I would suggest trying to log in local as the local
administrator to
|> > |> > install it
|> > |> > Thanks,
|> > |> > Darrell Gorter[MSFT]
|> > |> >
|> > |> > This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers
no
|> > rights
|> > |> > --------------------
|> > |> > >Thread-Topic: adminpak 2003 on Vista 64
|> > |> > >thread-index: AcesH8JbHl+on9qtTJ2ZUQWnBorEww==
|> > |> > >X-WBNR-Posting-Host: 208.5.204.46
|> > |> > >From: =?Utf-8?B?RGF2aWQgSA==?= <DavidH@discussions.microsoft.com>
|> > |> > >References:
<0D616935-2A6F-4D39-92F4-7661485FCF78@microsoft.com>
|> > |> > <B9E656AB-1843-423F-8C6F-3DF44C688B3A@microsoft.com>
|> > |> > <9721EFEE-D083-4EC9-B30E-6C34C1658CCB@microsoft.com>
|> > |> > <AgE8kNgqHHA.2304@TK2MSFTNGHUB02.phx.gbl>
|> > |> > >Subject: Re: adminpak 2003 on Vista 64
|> > |> > >Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 04:58:00 -0700
|> > |> > >Lines: 91
|> > |> > >Message-ID: <86C6FF5D-70EA-462E-B9D0-86E3C89346D9@microsoft.com>
|> > |> > >MIME-Version: 1.0
|> > |> > >Content-Type: text/plain;
|> > |> > > charset="Utf-8"
|> > |> > >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
|> > |> > >X-Newsreader: Microsoft CDO for Windows 2000
|> > |> > >Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
|> > |> > >Importance: normal
|> > |> > >Priority: normal
|> > |> > >X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.2826
|> > |> > >Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windows.64bit.general
|> > |> > >Path: TK2MSFTNGHUB02.phx.gbl
|> > |> > >Xref: TK2MSFTNGHUB02.phx.gbl
|> > microsoft.public.windows.64bit.general:7278
|> > |> > >NNTP-Posting-Host: tk2msftibfm01.phx.gbl 10.40.244.149
|> > |> > >X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.windows.64bit.general
|> > |> > >
|> > |> > >Thanks for the response Darrell. As you can see from my previous
post
|> > in
|> > |> > this
|> > |> > >thread I believe I followed the directions in the KB article but
was
|> > still
|> > |> > >unable to use the tools. You suggest that being logged on as a
Domain
|> > |> > Admin
|> > |> > >is not enough. Could you be a little more specific as to what
else do
|> > I
|> > |> > need
|> > |> > >to do.
|> > |> > >Thanks again,
|> > |> > >David
|> > |> > >
|> > |> > >""Darrell Gorter[MSFT]"" wrote:
|> > |> > >
|> > |> > >> Hello David,
|> > |> > >> The Windows 2003 SP1 Admin pack should install on Windows
VIsta and
|> > are
|> > |> > >> supported.
|> > |> > >> Following all the steps in the article should work, just being
|> > logged in
|> > |> > as
|> > |> > >> a Domain Administrator is not enough.
|> > |> > >> This is not the place for Windows Server 2008 admin tools
|> > discussion
|> > |> > yet.
|> > |> > >> Thanks,
|> > |> > >> Darrell Gorter[MSFT]
|> > |> > >>
|> > |> > >> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and
confers no
|> > |> > rights
|> > |> > >> --------------------
|> > |> > >> >Thread-Topic: adminpak 2003 on Vista 64
|> > |> > >> >thread-index: Acep0fWsLs/FqyVPRT+KMu9XGGEdcA==
|> > |> > >> >X-WBNR-Posting-Host: 208.5.204.42
|> > |> > >> >From: =?Utf-8?B?RGF2aWQgSA==?=
<DavidH@discussions.microsoft.com>
|> > |> > >> >References:
<0D616935-2A6F-4D39-92F4-7661485FCF78@microsoft.com>
|> > |> > >> <B9E656AB-1843-423F-8C6F-3DF44C688B3A@microsoft.com>
|> > |> > >> >Subject: Re: adminpak 2003 on Vista 64
|> > |> > >> >Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2007 06:36:03 -0700
|> > |> > >> >Lines: 35
|> > |> > >> >Message-ID:
<9721EFEE-D083-4EC9-B30E-6C34C1658CCB@microsoft.com>
|> > |> > >> >MIME-Version: 1.0
|> > |> > >> >Content-Type: text/plain;
|> > |> > >> > charset="Utf-8"
|> > |> > >> >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
|> > |> > >> >X-Newsreader: Microsoft CDO for Windows 2000
|> > |> > >> >Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
|> > |> > >> >Importance: normal
|> > |> > >> >Priority: normal
|> > |> > >> >X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.2826
|> > |> > >> >Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windows.64bit.general
|> > |> > >> >Path: TK2MSFTNGHUB02.phx.gbl
|> > |> > >> >Xref: TK2MSFTNGHUB02.phx.gbl
|> > microsoft.public.windows.64bit.general:7210
|> > |> > >> >NNTP-Posting-Host: tk2msftibfm01.phx.gbl 10.40.244.149
|> > |> > >> >X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.windows.64bit.general
|> > |> > >> >
|> > |> > >> >Thanks Charlie. That was my suspicion as well. I wonder if
the
|> > |> > analagous
|> > |> > >> >Longhorn administrator tools will be compatible with Vista?
|> > hmmm...
|> > |> > I've
|> > |> > >> been
|> > |> > >> >meaning to load the recent beta of Longhorn anyway, maybe
I'll
|> > give it
|> > |> > a
|> > |> > >> try.
|> > |> > >> >
|> > |> > >> >Thanks
|> > |> > >> >David H
|> > |> > >> >
|> > |> > >> >"Charlie Russel - MVP" wrote:
|> > |> > >> >
|> > |> > >> >> Those AdminPak tools were never designed to run on Vista,
|> > frankly.
|> > |> > I've
|> > |> > >> seen
|> > |> > >> >> enough threads to think that some people have managed to
get
|> > them
|> > |> > >> installed,
|> > |> > >> >> but also enough evidence that they're not all that well
behaved
|> > even
|> > |> > >> then.
|> > |> > >> >> This is, I'm afraid, a place for using Remote Desktop to
the
|> > server.
|> > |> > >> >>
|> > |> > >> >> --
|> > |> > >> >> Charlie.
|> > |> > >> >>
http://msmvps.com/xperts64
|> > |> > >> >>
http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/charlie.russel
|> > |> > >> >>
|> > |> > >> >>
|> > |> > >> >> "David H" <DavidH@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in
message
|> > |> > >> >> news:0D616935-2A6F-4D39-92F4-7661485FCF78@microsoft.com...
|> > |> > >> >> > several threads about adminpak I have read suggest that I
can
|> > not
|> > |> > yet
|> > |> > >> >> > install
|> > |> > >> >> > the adminpak from Win2k3 server R2 on a vista 64 box.
However,
|> > this
|> > |> > KB
|> > |> > >> >> > article suggests that I can
|> > |> > >> >> > (
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx/kb/930056). I
tried
|> > the
|> > |> > >> >> > resolution
|> > |> > >> >> > in the KB article but I still can not run the adminpak
tools,
|> > I
|> > |> > still
|> > |> > >> get
|> > |> > >> >> > the
|> > |> > >> >> > 'MMC could not create the snap-in' error and I am logged
in as
|> > a
|> > |> > >> member of
|> > |> > >> >> > the domain admin's group.
|> > |> > >> >> >
|> > |> > >> >> > So which is it, can I do this or not?
|> > |> > >> >>
|> > |> > >> >
|> > |> > >>
|> > |> > >>
|> > |> > >
|> > |> >
|> > |> >
|> > |>
|> >
|> >
|>