Darrellg
Tue Sep 06 19:47:45 CDT 2005
Hello Igor,
Yes it was considered.
Thanks,
Darrell Gorter[MSFT]
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights
--------------------
<From: "igor1960" <igortebelev@yahoo.com>
<References: <uq$Lo47rFHA.3720@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl>
<O47L8q8rFHA.912@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl>
<#IQIMB9rFHA.1032@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl>
<S$HK4z$rFHA.3396@TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl>
<u$jAaJAsFHA.1256@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl>
<4yM7y0AsFHA.2536@TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl>
<Subject: Re: activex in 64 bit
<Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2005 14:26:22 -0700
<Lines: 133
<X-Priority: 3
<X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
<X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180
<X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180
<X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
<Message-ID: <OvdzmmysFHA.2008@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl>
<Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windows.64bit.general
<NNTP-Posting-Host: 65.88.178.10
<Path: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl
<Xref: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl microsoft.public.windows.64bit.general:16789
<X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.windows.64bit.general
<
<Darrell,
<As you are MSFT guy here I want to ask you a question:
<Did anybody at MSFT ever considered possibility of running 32bit
ActiveX(s)
<inside 64bit IE? Don't tell me it's impossible, as if you do that: I'll be
<ready to sell you technology to do that...
<
<I
<
<""Darrell Gorter[MSFT]"" <Darrellg@online.microsoft.com> wrote in message
<news:4yM7y0AsFHA.2536@TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl...
<> Hello Colin,
<> Are you using the 32-bit or the 64-bit browser or both?
<> Do you have the case number?
<> That may not be an ActiveX issue, that may be an IE issue with the page
or
<> with the versions supplied to the page.
<> Thanks,
<> Darrell Gorter[MSFT]
<>
<> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights
<> --------------------
<> <From: "Colin Nowell" <Colin@NowSPAMell.co.uk>
<> <References: <uq$Lo47rFHA.3720@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl>
<> <O47L8q8rFHA.912@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl>
<> <#IQIMB9rFHA.1032@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl>
<> <S$HK4z$rFHA.3396@TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl>
<> <Subject: Re: activex in 64 bit
<> <Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2005 22:07:37 +0100
<> <Lines: 80
<> <X-Priority: 3
<> <X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
<> <X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.3790.1830
<> <X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.1830
<> <X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
<> <X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 0535-3, 02/09/2005), Outbound message
<> <X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
<> <Message-ID: <u$jAaJAsFHA.1256@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl>
<> <Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windows.64bit.general
<> <NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.152.177.171
<> <Path: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl
<> <Xref: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl microsoft.public.windows.64bit.general:16519
<> <X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.windows.64bit.general
<> <
<> <Well, I'd say that the fact that the "Microsoft Genuine Advantage
<> Programme"
<> <doesn't work (and I have an open ticket with MS Support about it) and is
<> <"broke" when running x64 Windows ("Operating System not supported") is a
<> <pretty darn good reason....
<> <
<> <Colin
<> <
<> <""Darrell Gorter[MSFT]"" <Darrellg@online.microsoft.com> wrote in
message
<> <news:S$HK4z$rFHA.3396@TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl...
<> <> Hello John,
<> <> I fail to see what point you are trying to make here.
<> <> 64-bit Active-X controls work in the 64-bit browser.
<> <> 32-bit Active-X controls work in the 32-bit browser.
<> <> Since most existing Active-X controls today are 32-bit, the default
<> <> browser
<> <> is 32-bit, however links exist to the 64-bit broswer.
<> <> This gives users the best experience today while 64-bit Active-X
<> controls
<> <> are being generated.
<> <> How is this letting 64-bit users down?
<> <> Thanks,
<> <> Darrell Gorter[MSFT]
<> <>
<> <> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
<> rights
<> <> --------------------
<> <> <From: "John Barnes" <jbfoofy@email.net>
<> <> <References: <uq$Lo47rFHA.3720@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl>
<> <> <O47L8q8rFHA.912@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl>
<> <> <Subject: Re: activex in 64 bit
<> <> <Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2005 08:09:17 -0700
<> <> <Lines: 28
<> <> <X-Priority: 3
<> <> <X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
<> <> <X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2670
<> <> <X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670
<> <> <X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Response
<> <> <Message-ID: <#IQIMB9rFHA.1032@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl>
<> <> <Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windows.64bit.general
<> <> <NNTP-Posting-Host: 0-1pool150-228.nas8.spokane1.wa.us.da.qwest.net
<> <> 67.0.150.228
<> <> <Path: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl
<> <> <Xref: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl
<> microsoft.public.windows.64bit.general:16505
<> <> <X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.windows.64bit.general
<> <> <
<> <> <Another place where Microsoft has let 64-bitters down. They write
<> their
<> <> own
<> <> <ActiveX for a number of processes. At least according to the
<> properties
<> <> <dialog.
<> <> <
<> <> <
<> <> <"Andre Da Costa" <andred25@hotmail.com> wrote in message
<> <> <news:O47L8q8rFHA.912@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
<> <> <> This one is in the hands of the industry, a lot of companies and
<> <> content
<> <> <> based technologies such as Flash Player are not yet supported, not
<> <> until
<> <> <> these technologies are developed and deployed on IE 64-Bit will you
<> see
<> <> <> 64-Bit ActiveX Controls start being developed for that particular
<> <> version
<> <> <> of the browser. Just my opinion.
<> <> <> --
<> <> <> Andre
<> <> <> Extended64 |
http://www.extended64.com
<> <> <> Blog |
http://www.extended64.com/blogs/andre
<> <> <>
http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta
<> <> <> FAQ for MS AntiSpy
<> <>
http://www.geocities.com/marfer_mvp/FAQ_MSantispy.htm
<> <> <> "Kue2" <h.j.kennedy@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
<> <> <> news:uq$Lo47rFHA.3720@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
<> <> <>> any word on when it will be supported in 64 bit?
<> <> <>>
<> <> <>> --
<> <> <>> Hugh
<> <> <>>
<> <> <>
<> <> <
<> <> <
<> <> <
<> <>
<> <
<> <
<> <
<>
<
<
<