Time Clock

Hey has anyone notice that in the rtm of x64 the clock does not keep the
right time. It always loses about 1.5 hours each day. And the update does
not update the clock. The only way it will update is to do it manually.
Did not have this problem in 1433 or 1288

James
Fri Jun 03 12:13:52 CDT 2005

I'm not seeing that problem. My computer's clock ran ridiculously fast
(about two-fold) once, and it resolved itself with a hard reset.

"t" <a@a.com> wrote in message news:O5Ofi0FaFHA.3596@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> Hey has anyone notice that in the rtm of x64 the clock does not keep the
> right time. It always loses about 1.5 hours each day. And the update does
> not update the clock. The only way it will update is to do it manually.
> Did not have this problem in 1433 or 1288
>

MHPNW
Fri Jun 03 12:26:18 CDT 2005

Haven't had that prob with mine.....and I've had it installed for about 3
weeks RTM, and 6 Months on the beta ....
I'd be checking my MB Battery........

Dennis
"t" <a@a.com> wrote in message news:O5Ofi0FaFHA.3596@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> Hey has anyone notice that in the rtm of x64 the clock does not keep the
> right time. It always loses about 1.5 hours each day. And the update does
> not update the clock. The only way it will update is to do it manually.
> Did not have this problem in 1433 or 1288
>
>

Charlie
Fri Jun 03 12:37:19 CDT 2005

check that the Windows Time Service is running. I can't really double check
this here, since I'm on a domain and the domain controller sets the time. But
there's really no reason other than the time service being off that you would
have a problem.

--
Charlie.

t wrote:
> Hey has anyone notice that in the rtm of x64 the clock does not keep
> the right time. It always loses about 1.5 hours each day. And the
> update does not update the clock. The only way it will update is to
> do it manually. Did not have this problem in 1433 or 1288