Andre
Thu May 18 14:33:10 CDT 2006
No, the 1GB of RAM is a realistic estimate if you plan to run Windows Vista
in addition to additional applications on that system. The visual effects
such Aero do serve a purpose, providing smoother video, thats not jaggy,
also, its easier on the eyes and its just beautiful. What purpose does Aqua
serve in OS X?
--
Andre
Extended64 |
http://www.extended64.com
Blog |
http://www.extended64.com/blogs/andre
http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta
"John John" <audetweld@nbnet.nb.ca> wrote in message
news:%23KX3szqeGHA.2068@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>I have not tried Vista but I just have to wonder...
>
> How much more expensive will the "Aero" Vista Premium be? What will it
> include other than fancy "eye candy" over the other editions? After
> paying that much more for fancy visual effect how many people will
> simply turn the visual effects off, thus flushing money down the drain?
>
> How many people simply turn off all the XP visual effects and run the
> Classic Desktop to have more power to run the applications? Most of the
> XP installations that I have done for friends and neighbours ended up
> without fancy visuals because the users accustomed to the older Windows
> simply hate the XP "Luna" look or they notice how much of a drag these
> visuals have on other applications. Let's be honest, how many of the
> most seasoned and knowledgeable users turn off these fancy features?
>
> From the site Andre pointed us to I read:
>
> A Windows Vista Premium Ready PC includes at least:
>
> * 1 GHz 32-bit (x86) or 64-bit (x64) processor1.
> * 1 GB of system memory.
> * A graphics processor that runs Windows Aero2.
> * 128 MB of graphics memory.
> .....
>
> Not to bitch and complain but I doubt that I would want 1 GB Ram and all
> the graphics memory to be used just so Windows can look pretty. There
> is not just Windows in the picture, along with these new computers with
> tons of memory, fast multi-core cpu's and super expensive video cards
> will come games and applications to make use of it all. I don't need
> Windows to take what the applications want or need. I want my
> applications to scream and Windows to do what it's supposed to do even
> faster and better without crashing! Looking pretty is for other things...
>
> Since Windows 95 haven't we all, or haven't most of use been engaged in
> a tweaking quest to make Windows faster and more robust, a simple search
> on the internet will yield thousands of sites with information and
> suggestions on how to disable non necessary Windows "features". And
> ever since Windows 95, each and every new Windows release brings forth
> more fluff to disable and tweak and a whole pile of new websites devoted
> to the "eternal quest" of making Windows faster. Vista will sure lead
> to many more such "tweaking" sites, a new height in pc "fluff".
>
> John
>
> Andre Da Costa [Extended64] wrote:
>
>> Quote: As they prepare for the arrival of Windows VistaT, customers
>> shopping for new PCs or upgrading their hardware now have more
>> comprehensive guidance to aid them in their decisions. Today,
>> Microsoft Corp. announced the launch of the Windows Vista "Get Ready"
>> Web site, the worldwide availability of Windows Vista Capable PCs,
>> the upcoming availability of Premium Ready PCs and the availability
>> of the Windows Vista Upgrade Advisor beta. "Customers have many
>> options and choices to make when it comes to buying a PC today. A
>> wide range of form factors, price points and new technologies figure
>> into their decisions," said Mike Sievert, corporate vice president of
>> Windows® Product Management and Marketing at Microsoft. "With that
>> in mind, Microsoft and OEMs are making it easier to prepare for the
>> arrival of Windows Vista. Customers now have the information they
>> need to get a great Windows XP-based PC today that will deliver rich
>> Windows Vista experiences tomorrow."
>>
>> Read the rest here:
>>
http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/2006/may06/05-18GetReadyPR.mspx
>>
>>
>> Get Ready website:
>>
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsvista/getready/capable.mspx
>>
>> It seems very fair to me.
>>
>