Netscape 8.0 has been released.

Please try!

http://browser.netscape.com/ns8/

--
Jerry Wong

http://www.geocities.com/jerrywong.geo

¦ý§ÚÌ·Ó¥LªºÀ³³\¡B ¬ß±æ·s¤Ñ·s¦a¡A¦³¸q©~¦b¨ä¤¤¡C(©¼«á3:13)
But in keeping with his promise we are looking forward to
new heaven and a new earth, the home of righteousness.
(2 Peter 3:13)

Shenan
Sat May 21 03:23:00 CDT 2005

Jerry Wong wrote:
> Please try!
>
> http://browser.netscape.com/ns8/

Notice the first security patches have also been released..
http://www.betanews.com/article/Newborn_Netscape_Has_Defects/1116622534

--
Shenan Stanley
MS-MVP
--

Michael
Sat May 21 04:45:39 CDT 2005

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_0027_01C55DAF.2C1FF900
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

In news:u0IbIwdXFHA.1508@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl,
Jerry Wong <jerrywkwong_nospam@netvigator.com> replied with a ;-)
> Please try!
>=20
> http://browser.netscape.com/ns8/

Please don't, =
http://www.betanews.com/article/Newborn_Netscape_Has_Defects/1116622534
"Lead Firefox engineer Ben Goodger criticized the slip up, stating, "If =
security is important to you, this demonstration should show that =
browsers that are redistributions of the official Mozilla releases are =
never going to give you security updates as quickly as Mozilla will =
itself for its supported products," in his personal Web blog.=20

Goodger encourages Internet users to use Firefox in lieu of Netscape, =
deeming it a more secure Web browser. To prove his point, Goodger =
published exploit code demonstrating Netscape's vulnerabilities."=20

As any browser gains popularity it's vulnerabilities will be exploited. =
You must always be carefull when browsing the web. It is a shame that =
the low life mentality of a few disillusioned individuals impacts the =
usefulness of the internet.=20

Always check before leaping.
--=20
Michael Stevens MS-MVP XP
xpnews@bogusmichaelstevenstech.com
http://www.michaelstevenstech.com
For a better newsgroup experience. Setup a newsreader.
http://www.michaelstevenstech.com/outlookexpressnewreader.htm

------=_NextPart_000_0027_01C55DAF.2C1FF900
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD><LINK href=3D"C:\Program Files\OE-QuoteFix\styles.css" =
rel=3Dstylesheet>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2900.2627" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV>In <A class=3D0 =

href=3D"news:u0IbIwdXFHA.1508@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl">news:u0IbIwdXFHA.1508@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl</A>, Jerry Wong <<A class=3D0=20
href=3D"mailto:jerrywkwong_nospam@netvigator.com">jerrywkwong_nospam@netvigator.com</A>>=20
replied with a ;-) >=20
Please try! > > <A class=3D1=20
href=3D"http://browser.netscape.com/ns8/">http://browser.netscape.com/ns8/</A> <SPAN=20
class=3Dq0> Please don't, <A=20
href=3D"http://www.betanews.com/article/Newborn_Netscape_Has_Defects/1116=
622534">http://www.betanews.com/article/Newborn_Netscape_Has_Defects/1116=
622534</A></DIV>
<DIV>
"Lead Firefox engineer Ben Goodger =
criticized the=20
slip up, stating, "If security is important to you, this demonstration =
should=20
show that browsers that are redistributions of the official Mozilla =
releases are=20
never going to give you security updates as quickly as Mozilla will =
itself for=20
its supported products," in his personal Web blog. 
Goodger encourages Internet users to use =
Firefox in=20
lieu of Netscape, deeming it a more <A class=3DiAs=20
style=3D"COLOR: #273595; BORDER-BOTTOM: 1px solid; TEXT-DECORATION: =
underline"=20
href=3D"http://www.betanews.com/article/Newborn_Netscape_Has_Defects/1116=
622534#"=20
target=3D_blank>secure Web</A> browser. To prove his point, Goodger published exploit code=20
demonstrating Netscape's vulnerabilities." 
As any browser gains popularity it's=20
vulnerabilities will be exploited. You must always be carefull when =

browsing the web. It is a shame that the low life mentality of a few=20
disillusioned individuals impacts the usefulness of the internet. =

Always check before leaping. -- =
 Michael=20
Stevens MS-MVP XP <A=20
href=3D"mailto:xpnews@bogusmichaelstevenstech.com">xpnews@bogusmichaelste=
venstech.com</A> <A=20
href=3D"http://www.michaelstevenstech.com">http://www.michaelstevenstech.=
com</A> For=20
a better newsgroup experience. Setup a newsreader. <A=20
href=3D"http://www.michaelstevenstech.com/outlookexpressnewreader.htm">ht=
tp://www.michaelstevenstech.com/outlookexpressnewreader.htm</A></P=
>
 </DIV></BODY></HTML>

------=_NextPart_000_0027_01C55DAF.2C1FF900--

Alias
Sat May 21 05:06:23 CDT 2005

Anything made by AOL should be avoided at all costs!

Alias

"Jerry Wong" <jerrywkwong_nospam@netvigator.com> wrote

> Please try!
>
> http://browser.netscape.com/ns8/
>
>
>
> --
> Jerry Wong
>
> http://www.geocities.com/jerrywong.geo
>
> ¦ý§ÚÌ·Ó¥LªºÀ³³\¡B ¬ß±æ·s¤Ñ·s¦a¡A¦³¸q©~¦b¨ä¤¤¡C(©¼«á3:13)
> But in keeping with his promise we are looking forward to
> new heaven and a new earth, the home of righteousness.
> (2 Peter 3:13)
>

Martin
Sat May 21 05:15:42 CDT 2005

Michael Stevens wrote:
<cut<
> As any browser gains popularity it's vulnerabilities will be exploited.
> You must always be carefull when browsing the web. It is a shame that
> the low life mentality of a few disillusioned individuals impacts the
> usefulness of the internet.
>

That's the point, however if browser "population" is more evenly spread,
the chances of a specific attack is spread accordingly.
Thus a heterogeneous environment has the potention to be more stable
then a homogeneous one.
To bad that a homogeneous environment has more potention to interoperate
then the heterogeneous. Of course this could be resolved by fully
following standards, but then again it if everybody does that, the
heterogeneous part disappears and by this the potential advantage of
stability. So choose your poison wisely.

--
mph

Rick
Sat May 21 08:01:36 CDT 2005

If you had read the article carefully, you would have noted that
Netscape updated their download file late Thursday and the current
download has the security risk fixed.

YOUR INFORMATION IS OUT OF DATE!

Shenan Stanley wrote:
> Jerry Wong wrote:
>
>>Please try!
>>
>>http://browser.netscape.com/ns8/
>
>
> Notice the first security patches have also been released..
> http://www.betanews.com/article/Newborn_Netscape_Has_Defects/1116622534
>

Andre
Sat May 21 10:24:40 CDT 2005

Its an annoying browser.
--

Andre
http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta
FAQ for MS AntiSpy http://www.geocities.com/marfer_mvp/FAQ_MSantispy.htm

"Rick" <rick@home.net> wrote in message
news:OysN5UgXFHA.3584@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
> If you had read the article carefully, you would have noted that Netscape
> updated their download file late Thursday and the current download has the
> security risk fixed.
>
> YOUR INFORMATION IS OUT OF DATE!
>
>
> Shenan Stanley wrote:
>> Jerry Wong wrote:
>>
>>>Please try!
>>>
>>>http://browser.netscape.com/ns8/
>>
>>
>> Notice the first security patches have also been released..
>> http://www.betanews.com/article/Newborn_Netscape_Has_Defects/1116622534
>>

NNBXX
Sat May 21 10:32:40 CDT 2005

Agree. Prefer Firefox by far.

"Andre Da Costa" <andred25@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:u9ts4khXFHA.2684@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> Its an annoying browser.
> --
>
> Andre
> http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta
> FAQ for MS AntiSpy http://www.geocities.com/marfer_mvp/FAQ_MSantispy.htm
>
> "Rick" <rick@home.net> wrote in message
> news:OysN5UgXFHA.3584@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
>> If you had read the article carefully, you would have noted that Netscape
>> updated their download file late Thursday and the current download has
>> the security risk fixed.
>>
>> YOUR INFORMATION IS OUT OF DATE!
>>
>>
>> Shenan Stanley wrote:
>>> Jerry Wong wrote:
>>>
>>>>Please try!
>>>>
>>>>http://browser.netscape.com/ns8/
>>>
>>>
>>> Notice the first security patches have also been released..
>>> http://www.betanews.com/article/Newborn_Netscape_Has_Defects/1116622534
>>>
>
>

Shenan
Sat May 21 10:39:47 CDT 2005

Jerry Wong wrote:
> Please try!
>
> http://browser.netscape.com/ns8/

Shenan Stanley wrote:
>> Notice the first security patches have also been released..
>> http://www.betanews.com/article/Newborn_Netscape_Has_Defects/1116622534

Rick wrote:
> If you had read the article carefully, you would have noted that
> Netscape updated their download file late Thursday and the current
> download has the security risk fixed.
>
> YOUR INFORMATION IS OUT OF DATE!

No - actually my information is not out of date - it is still correct - the
first security patches have been released since the initial release.
Sadly (predictably some would argue) only a short time after the browswer
was released to the public.

Not to mention that is why I pointed to the article... If it can have
defects on day 1... it will have defects on day 500.
Just proving there is no perfect browser... After all, if there was - then
there would have been no point in Netscape still trying in the first place.
heh

--
Shenan Stanley
MS-MVP
--

Jerry
Sat May 21 10:42:22 CDT 2005

No matter 8.0 or 8.0.1, let's try it!

--
Jerry Wong

http://www.geocities.com/jerrywong.geo

????????? ??????,???????(??3:13)
But in keeping with his promise we are looking forward to
new heaven and a new earth, the home of righteousness.
(2 Peter 3:13)
"Rick" <rick@home.net> ???????:OysN5UgXFHA.3584@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
> If you had read the article carefully, you would have noted that Netscape
> updated their download file late Thursday and the current download has the
> security risk fixed.
>
> YOUR INFORMATION IS OUT OF DATE!
>
>
> Shenan Stanley wrote:
>> Jerry Wong wrote:
>>
>>>Please try!
>>>
>>>http://browser.netscape.com/ns8/
>>
>>
>> Notice the first security patches have also been released..
>> http://www.betanews.com/article/Newborn_Netscape_Has_Defects/1116622534
>>

Rick
Sat May 21 10:48:50 CDT 2005

They all have their idiosyncrocies.

Firefox won't save my login properly for my cellular account. The login
id is my phone number, but it's in 3 separate fields. Firefox only
saves the last field, 4 numbers. Netscape 7.2 & 8.0.1 save the entire
number correctly.

You just have to be smarter than the browser!

NNBXX wrote:
> Agree. Prefer Firefox by far.
>
>
> "Andre Da Costa" <andred25@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:u9ts4khXFHA.2684@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
>
>>Its an annoying browser.
>>--
>>
>>Andre
>>http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta
>>FAQ for MS AntiSpy http://www.geocities.com/marfer_mvp/FAQ_MSantispy.htm
>>
>>"Rick" <rick@home.net> wrote in message
>>news:OysN5UgXFHA.3584@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
>>
>>>If you had read the article carefully, you would have noted that Netscape
>>>updated their download file late Thursday and the current download has
>>>the security risk fixed.
>>>
>>>YOUR INFORMATION IS OUT OF DATE!
>>>
>>>
>>>Shenan Stanley wrote:
>>>
>>>>Jerry Wong wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Please try!
>>>>>
>>>>>http://browser.netscape.com/ns8/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Notice the first security patches have also been released..
>>>>http://www.betanews.com/article/Newborn_Netscape_Has_Defects/1116622534
>>>>
>>
>>
>
>

The_Rock
Sat May 21 10:55:02 CDT 2005

its a cone of firefox ... come on now ....

VC

"NNBXX" <jbfaure@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:uPIxWphXFHA.2520@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> Agree. Prefer Firefox by far.
>
>
> "Andre Da Costa" <andred25@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:u9ts4khXFHA.2684@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> > Its an annoying browser.
> > --
> >
> > Andre
> > http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta
> > FAQ for MS AntiSpy http://www.geocities.com/marfer_mvp/FAQ_MSantispy.htm
> >
> > "Rick" <rick@home.net> wrote in message
> > news:OysN5UgXFHA.3584@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
> >> If you had read the article carefully, you would have noted that
Netscape
> >> updated their download file late Thursday and the current download has
> >> the security risk fixed.
> >>
> >> YOUR INFORMATION IS OUT OF DATE!
> >>
> >>
> >> Shenan Stanley wrote:
> >>> Jerry Wong wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>Please try!
> >>>>
> >>>>http://browser.netscape.com/ns8/
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Notice the first security patches have also been released..
> >>>
http://www.betanews.com/article/Newborn_Netscape_Has_Defects/1116622534
> >>>
> >
> >
>
>

Andre
Sat May 21 11:14:06 CDT 2005

Why Jerry, do you like being annoyed?
--

Andre
http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta
FAQ for MS AntiSpy http://www.geocities.com/marfer_mvp/FAQ_MSantispy.htm

"Jerry Wong" <jerrywkwong_nospam@netvigator.com> wrote in message
news:eGOswuhXFHA.3840@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> No matter 8.0 or 8.0.1, let's try it!
>
> --
> Jerry Wong
>
> http://www.geocities.com/jerrywong.geo
>
> ????????? ??????,???????(??3:13)
> But in keeping with his promise we are looking forward to
> new heaven and a new earth, the home of righteousness.
> (2 Peter 3:13)
> "Rick" <rick@home.net> ???????:OysN5UgXFHA.3584@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
>> If you had read the article carefully, you would have noted that Netscape
>> updated their download file late Thursday and the current download has
>> the security risk fixed.
>>
>> YOUR INFORMATION IS OUT OF DATE!
>>
>>
>> Shenan Stanley wrote:
>>> Jerry Wong wrote:
>>>
>>>>Please try!
>>>>
>>>>http://browser.netscape.com/ns8/
>>>
>>>
>>> Notice the first security patches have also been released..
>>> http://www.betanews.com/article/Newborn_Netscape_Has_Defects/1116622534
>>>
>
>

Rick
Sat May 21 12:19:52 CDT 2005

But the point is you did not read the article. The early release on
Thursday morning was based on Firefox 1.0.3 and Netscape quickly updated
the download version with the Firefox 1.0.4 security fix and that is
what is now available.

It is also a very real fact that there are fewer security and privacy
risks in Opera 8.00, Firefox 1.0.4, and now Netscape 8.0.1.

So, your information is still just as out of date as it was in the
beginning!

Shenan Stanley wrote:
> No - actually my information is not out of date - it is still correct - the
> first security patches have been released since the initial release.
> Sadly (predictably some would argue) only a short time after the browswer
> was released to the public.
>
> Not to mention that is why I pointed to the article... If it can have
> defects on day 1... it will have defects on day 500.
> Just proving there is no perfect browser... After all, if there was - then
> there would have been no point in Netscape still trying in the first place.
> heh
>

Shenan
Sat May 21 14:06:03 CDT 2005

Shenan Stanley wrote:
> No - actually my information is not out of date - it is still
> correct - the first security patches have been released since the
> initial release. Sadly (predictably some would argue) only a short time
> after the
> browswer was released to the public.
>
> Not to mention that is why I pointed to the article... If it can
> have defects on day 1... it will have defects on day 500.
> Just proving there is no perfect browser... After all, if there was
> - then there would have been no point in Netscape still trying in
> the first place. heh

Rick wrote:
> But the point is you did not read the article. The early release on
> Thursday morning was based on Firefox 1.0.3 and Netscape quickly
> updated the download version with the Firefox 1.0.4 security fix and
> that is what is now available.
>
> It is also a very real fact that there are fewer security and privacy
> risks in Opera 8.00, Firefox 1.0.4, and now Netscape 8.0.1.
>
> So, your information is still just as out of date as it was in the
> beginning!

Perhaps you should read before you respond... I left my first response to
you above so you could go back and see that not only did I read it, but my
point still stands.

--
Shenan Stanley
MS-MVP
--

Rick
Sat May 21 14:56:59 CDT 2005

Shenan Stanley wrote:
> Shenan Stanley wrote:
>
>>No - actually my information is not out of date - it is still
>>correct - the first security patches have been released since the
>>initial release. Sadly (predictably some would argue) only a short time
>>after the
>>browswer was released to the public.
>>
>>Not to mention that is why I pointed to the article... If it can
>>have defects on day 1... it will have defects on day 500.
>>Just proving there is no perfect browser... After all, if there was
>>- then there would have been no point in Netscape still trying in
>>the first place. heh
>
>
> Rick wrote:
>
>>But the point is you did not read the article. The early release on
>>Thursday morning was based on Firefox 1.0.3 and Netscape quickly
>>updated the download version with the Firefox 1.0.4 security fix and
>>that is what is now available.
>>
>>It is also a very real fact that there are fewer security and privacy
>>risks in Opera 8.00, Firefox 1.0.4, and now Netscape 8.0.1.
>>
>>So, your information is still just as out of date as it was in the
>>beginning!
>
>
> Perhaps you should read before you respond... I left my first response to
> you above so you could go back and see that not only did I read it, but my
> point still stands.
>

Then, if you think you have made some valid point, give me an example of
any software that has ever been produced that didn't have a defect!

No such software has ever existed, and probably never will! So, your
point is absolutely pointless!

Shenan
Sat May 21 15:04:39 CDT 2005

Rick wrote:
> Then, if you think you have made some valid point, give me an example
> of any software that has ever been produced that didn't have a defect!
>
> No such software has ever existed, and probably never will! So, your
> point is absolutely pointless!

Thank you for understanding my point..
And pointing it out again.
Glad you agree, finally.

--
Shenan Stanley
MS-MVP
--

Andre
Sat May 21 15:11:08 CDT 2005

You see what Netscape is doing to us.
--

Andre
http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta
FAQ for MS AntiSpy http://www.geocities.com/marfer_mvp/FAQ_MSantispy.htm

"Rick" <rick@home.net> wrote in message
news:OdPeA9jXFHA.2080@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
> Shenan Stanley wrote:
>> Shenan Stanley wrote:
>>
>>>No - actually my information is not out of date - it is still
>>>correct - the first security patches have been released since the
>>>initial release. Sadly (predictably some would argue) only a short time
>>>after the
>>>browswer was released to the public.
>>>
>>>Not to mention that is why I pointed to the article... If it can
>>>have defects on day 1... it will have defects on day 500.
>>>Just proving there is no perfect browser... After all, if there was
>>>- then there would have been no point in Netscape still trying in
>>>the first place. heh
>>
>>
>> Rick wrote:
>>
>>>But the point is you did not read the article. The early release on
>>>Thursday morning was based on Firefox 1.0.3 and Netscape quickly
>>>updated the download version with the Firefox 1.0.4 security fix and
>>>that is what is now available.
>>>
>>>It is also a very real fact that there are fewer security and privacy
>>>risks in Opera 8.00, Firefox 1.0.4, and now Netscape 8.0.1.
>>>
>>>So, your information is still just as out of date as it was in the
>>>beginning!
>>
>>
>> Perhaps you should read before you respond... I left my first response
>> to you above so you could go back and see that not only did I read it,
>> but my point still stands.
>>
>
> Then, if you think you have made some valid point, give me an example of
> any software that has ever been produced that didn't have a defect!
>
> No such software has ever existed, and probably never will! So, your
> point is absolutely pointless!

anonymus
Sat May 21 15:20:08 CDT 2005

Hey this thing is a very annoying subject. !
"Andre Da Costa" <andred25@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:OIu2gAiXFHA.2420@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> Why Jerry, do you like being annoyed?
> --
>
> Andre
> http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta
> FAQ for MS AntiSpy http://www.geocities.com/marfer_mvp/FAQ_MSantispy.htm
>
> "Jerry Wong" <jerrywkwong_nospam@netvigator.com> wrote in message
> news:eGOswuhXFHA.3840@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
>> No matter 8.0 or 8.0.1, let's try it!
>>
>> --
>> Jerry Wong
>>
>> http://www.geocities.com/jerrywong.geo
>>
>> ????????? ??????,???????(??3:13)
>> But in keeping with his promise we are looking forward to
>> new heaven and a new earth, the home of righteousness.
>> (2 Peter 3:13)
>> "Rick" <rick@home.net> ???????:OysN5UgXFHA.3584@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
>>> If you had read the article carefully, you would have noted that
>>> Netscape updated their download file late Thursday and the current
>>> download has the security risk fixed.
>>>
>>> YOUR INFORMATION IS OUT OF DATE!
>>>
>>>
>>> Shenan Stanley wrote:
>>>> Jerry Wong wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Please try!
>>>>>
>>>>>http://browser.netscape.com/ns8/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Notice the first security patches have also been released..
>>>> http://www.betanews.com/article/Newborn_Netscape_Has_Defects/1116622534
>>>>
>>
>>
>
>

NNBXX
Sat May 21 15:45:39 CDT 2005

Excellent :)

"Andre Da Costa" <andred25@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:ewWm9EkXFHA.3040@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
> You see what Netscape is doing to us.
> --
>
> Andre
> http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta
> FAQ for MS AntiSpy http://www.geocities.com/marfer_mvp/FAQ_MSantispy.htm
>
> "Rick" <rick@home.net> wrote in message
> news:OdPeA9jXFHA.2080@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
>> Shenan Stanley wrote:
>>> Shenan Stanley wrote:
>>>
>>>>No - actually my information is not out of date - it is still
>>>>correct - the first security patches have been released since the
>>>>initial release. Sadly (predictably some would argue) only a short time
>>>>after the
>>>>browswer was released to the public.
>>>>
>>>>Not to mention that is why I pointed to the article... If it can
>>>>have defects on day 1... it will have defects on day 500.
>>>>Just proving there is no perfect browser... After all, if there was
>>>>- then there would have been no point in Netscape still trying in
>>>>the first place. heh
>>>
>>>
>>> Rick wrote:
>>>
>>>>But the point is you did not read the article. The early release on
>>>>Thursday morning was based on Firefox 1.0.3 and Netscape quickly
>>>>updated the download version with the Firefox 1.0.4 security fix and
>>>>that is what is now available.
>>>>
>>>>It is also a very real fact that there are fewer security and privacy
>>>>risks in Opera 8.00, Firefox 1.0.4, and now Netscape 8.0.1.
>>>>
>>>>So, your information is still just as out of date as it was in the
>>>>beginning!
>>>
>>>
>>> Perhaps you should read before you respond... I left my first response
>>> to you above so you could go back and see that not only did I read it,
>>> but my point still stands.
>>>
>>
>> Then, if you think you have made some valid point, give me an example of
>> any software that has ever been produced that didn't have a defect!
>>
>> No such software has ever existed, and probably never will! So, your
>> point is absolutely pointless!
>
>

Andre
Sat May 21 18:38:08 CDT 2005

Netscape 8.0 - Annoying Edition.
--

Andre
http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta
FAQ for MS AntiSpy http://www.geocities.com/marfer_mvp/FAQ_MSantispy.htm

"anonymus" <anonymusdiscusion@killallspammers.com> wrote in message
news:uAfo8JkXFHA.2060@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> Hey this thing is a very annoying subject. !
> "Andre Da Costa" <andred25@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:OIu2gAiXFHA.2420@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
>> Why Jerry, do you like being annoyed?
>> --
>>
>> Andre
>> http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta
>> FAQ for MS AntiSpy http://www.geocities.com/marfer_mvp/FAQ_MSantispy.htm
>>
>> "Jerry Wong" <jerrywkwong_nospam@netvigator.com> wrote in message
>> news:eGOswuhXFHA.3840@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
>>> No matter 8.0 or 8.0.1, let's try it!
>>>
>>> --
>>> Jerry Wong
>>>
>>> http://www.geocities.com/jerrywong.geo
>>>
>>> ????????? ??????,???????(??3:13)
>>> But in keeping with his promise we are looking forward to
>>> new heaven and a new earth, the home of righteousness.
>>> (2 Peter 3:13)
>>> "Rick" <rick@home.net> ???????:OysN5UgXFHA.3584@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
>>>> If you had read the article carefully, you would have noted that
>>>> Netscape updated their download file late Thursday and the current
>>>> download has the security risk fixed.
>>>>
>>>> YOUR INFORMATION IS OUT OF DATE!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Shenan Stanley wrote:
>>>>> Jerry Wong wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Please try!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>http://browser.netscape.com/ns8/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Notice the first security patches have also been released..
>>>>> http://www.betanews.com/article/Newborn_Netscape_Has_Defects/1116622534
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>

Frank
Sat May 21 22:22:32 CDT 2005

Read the EULA carefully!
RESTRICTIONS forbids removing any advertising software that comes with it.

--
Frank Saunders, MS-MVP, IE/OE
Please respond in Newsgroup. Do not send email
http://www.fjsmjs.com
Protect your PC
http://www.microsoft.com/security/protect/

"Rick" <rick@home.net> wrote in message
news:OysN5UgXFHA.3584@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
> If you had read the article carefully, you would have noted that Netscape
> updated their download file late Thursday and the current download has the
> security risk fixed.
>
> YOUR INFORMATION IS OUT OF DATE!
>
>
> Shenan Stanley wrote:
>> Jerry Wong wrote:
>>
>>>Please try!
>>>
>>>http://browser.netscape.com/ns8/
>>
>>
>> Notice the first security patches have also been released..
>> http://www.betanews.com/article/Newborn_Netscape_Has_Defects/1116622534
>>

Les
Sun May 22 12:33:19 CDT 2005

On Sat, 21 May 2005 08:24:40 -0700, "Andre Da Costa"
<andred25@hotmail.com> wrote:

>Its an annoying browser.
>--

What do you expect? I mean after all it is owned by AOHell.

Morituri-|-Max
Sun May 22 15:27:22 CDT 2005

"Rick" <rick@home.net> wrote in message
news:%238%23tNliXFHA.3732@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> But the point is you did not read the article. The early release on
> Thursday morning was based on Firefox 1.0.3 and Netscape quickly updated
> the download version with the Firefox 1.0.4 security fix and that is what
> is now available.
>
> It is also a very real fact that there are fewer security and privacy
> risks in Opera 8.00, Firefox 1.0.4, and now Netscape 8.0.1.

I love Opera.. now if I could get it to recognize and work with my Biometric
Fingerprint Scanner from APC I'd be a happy camper..

Morituri-|-Max
Sun May 22 15:29:02 CDT 2005

"Rick" <rick@home.net> wrote in message
news:OdPeA9jXFHA.2080@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...

> Then, if you think you have made some valid point, give me an example of
> any software that has ever been produced that didn't have a defect!
>
> No such software has ever existed, and probably never will! So, your
> point is absolutely pointless!

MS Windows Millenium Edition.. it was Designed to BSOD.. therefore Ipso
Facto it was not a defect, merely an undocumented feature.

Morituri-|-Max
Sun May 22 15:29:55 CDT 2005

"Frank Saunders, MS-MVP, IE/OE" <franksaunders@mvps.org> wrote in message
news:OiVZD2nXFHA.584@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
> Read the EULA carefully!
> RESTRICTIONS forbids removing any advertising software that comes with it.

Unless you register it.

bp
Mon May 23 12:20:57 CDT 2005

On Sat, 21 May 2005 17:32:40 +0200, "NNBXX"
<jbfaure@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:

>Agree. Prefer Firefox by far.
It is FireFox more or less.
I like how the tabs work better in Netscape but it does have a little
to much bloat for me.
>
>
>"Andre Da Costa" <andred25@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:u9ts4khXFHA.2684@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
>> Its an annoying browser.
>> --
>>
>> Andre
>> http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta
>> FAQ for MS AntiSpy http://www.geocities.com/marfer_mvp/FAQ_MSantispy.htm
>>
>> "Rick" <rick@home.net> wrote in message
>> news:OysN5UgXFHA.3584@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
>>> If you had read the article carefully, you would have noted that Netscape
>>> updated their download file late Thursday and the current download has
>>> the security risk fixed.
>>>
>>> YOUR INFORMATION IS OUT OF DATE!
>>>
>>>
>>> Shenan Stanley wrote:
>>>> Jerry Wong wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Please try!
>>>>>
>>>>>http://browser.netscape.com/ns8/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Notice the first security patches have also been released..
>>>> http://www.betanews.com/article/Newborn_Netscape_Has_Defects/1116622534
>>>>
>>
>>
>

bp
Mon May 23 12:26:09 CDT 2005

On Sat, 21 May 2005 16:38:08 -0700, "Andre Da Costa"
<andred25@hotmail.com> wrote:

>Netscape 8.0 - Annoying Edition.

What's annoying about it ?

bp
Mon May 23 12:28:30 CDT 2005

On Sat, 21 May 2005 12:06:23 +0200, "Alias"
<aka@[notme]maskedandanonymous.org> wrote:

>Anything made by AOL should be avoided at all costs!
Care to explain why?
>
>Alias
>
>"Jerry Wong" <jerrywkwong_nospam@netvigator.com> wrote
>
>> Please try!
>>
>> http://browser.netscape.com/ns8/
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Jerry Wong
>>
>> http://www.geocities.com/jerrywong.geo
>>
>> ¦ý§ÚÌ·Ó¥LªºÀ³³\¡B ¬ß±æ·s¤Ñ·s¦a¡A¦³¸q©~¦b¨ä¤¤¡C(©¼«á3:13)
>> But in keeping with his promise we are looking forward to
>> new heaven and a new earth, the home of righteousness.
>> (2 Peter 3:13)
>>
>

bp
Mon May 23 12:28:41 CDT 2005

On Sat, 21 May 2005 22:22:32 -0500, "Frank Saunders, MS-MVP, IE/OE"
<franksaunders@mvps.org> wrote:

>Read the EULA carefully!
>RESTRICTIONS forbids removing any advertising software that comes with it.

So ?
Do you really think anyone gives a rats Ass about EULA's?

bp
Mon May 23 12:29:16 CDT 2005

On Sat, 21 May 2005 10:39:47 -0500, "Shenan Stanley"
<newshelper@gmail.com> wrote:

>Jerry Wong wrote:
>> Please try!
>>
>> http://browser.netscape.com/ns8/
>
>Shenan Stanley wrote:
>>> Notice the first security patches have also been released..
>>> http://www.betanews.com/article/Newborn_Netscape_Has_Defects/1116622534
>
>Rick wrote:
>> If you had read the article carefully, you would have noted that
>> Netscape updated their download file late Thursday and the current
>> download has the security risk fixed.
>>
>> YOUR INFORMATION IS OUT OF DATE!
>
>No - actually my information is not out of date - it is still correct - the
>first security patches have been released since the initial release.
>Sadly (predictably some would argue) only a short time after the browswer
>was released to the public.

Gee just like IE !!

>
>Not to mention that is why I pointed to the article... If it can have
>defects on day 1... it will have defects on day 500.

Just like IE !

>Just proving there is no perfect browser... After all, if there was - then
>there would have been no point in Netscape still trying in the first place.
>heh

Did some one say it was perfect ? I must have missed it.

Shenan
Mon May 23 12:47:32 CDT 2005

> Did some one say it was perfect ? I must have missed it.

Look - someone else who got the point...

--
Shenan Stanley
MS-MVP
--

bp
Mon May 23 13:02:31 CDT 2005

On Mon, 23 May 2005 12:47:32 -0500, "Shenan Stanley"
<newshelper@gmail.com> wrote:

>> Did some one say it was perfect ? I must have missed it.
>
>Look - someone else who got the point...

Well did they ?

Alias
Mon May 23 13:42:24 CDT 2005

<bp@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:8j4491hqderdcbn0f3rd3v19dgh1fubful@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 21 May 2005 12:06:23 +0200, "Alias"
> <aka@[notme]maskedandanonymous.org> wrote:
>
>>Anything made by AOL should be avoided at all costs!
> Care to explain why?

Sure. AOL Sucks. Why? I don't care for the way they install their software
on my machine and refuse to use any AIM version over 4.8.

Alias
>>
>>Alias
>>
>>"Jerry Wong" <jerrywkwong_nospam@netvigator.com> wrote
>>
>>> Please try!
>>>
>>> http://browser.netscape.com/ns8/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Jerry Wong
>>>
>>> http://www.geocities.com/jerrywong.geo
>>>
>>> ¦ý§ÚÌ·Ó¥LªºÀ³³\¡B ¬ß±æ·s¤Ñ·s¦a¡A¦³¸q©~¦b¨ä¤¤¡C(©¼«á3:13)
>>> But in keeping with his promise we are looking forward to
>>> new heaven and a new earth, the home of righteousness.
>>> (2 Peter 3:13)
>>>
>>
>

Shenan
Mon May 23 17:56:01 CDT 2005

bp wrote:
> Did some one say it was perfect ? I must have missed it.

Shenan Stanley wrote:
> Look - someone else who got the point...

bp wrote:
> Well did they ?

Doesn't matter. It is not.

--
Shenan Stanley
MS-MVP
--

Netscape 8.0 has been released.

Re: Netscape 8.0 has been released. by Shenan

Re: Netscape 8.0 has been released. by Michael

Re: Netscape 8.0 has been released. by Alias

Re: Netscape 8.0 has been released. by Martin

Re: Netscape 8.0 has been released. by Rick

Re: Netscape 8.0 has been released. by Andre

Re: Netscape 8.0 has been released. by NNBXX

Re: Netscape 8.0 has been released. by Shenan

Re: Netscape 8.0 has been released. by Jerry

Re: Netscape 8.0 has been released. by Rick

Re: Netscape 8.0 has been released. by The_Rock

Re: Netscape 8.0 has been released. by Andre

Re: Netscape 8.0 has been released. by Rick

Re: Netscape 8.0 has been released. by Shenan

Re: Netscape 8.0 has been released. by Rick

Re: Netscape 8.0 has been released. by Shenan

Re: Netscape 8.0 has been released. by Andre

Re: Netscape 8.0 has been released. by anonymus

Re: Netscape 8.0 has been released. by NNBXX

Re: Netscape 8.0 has been released. by Andre

Re: Netscape 8.0 has been released. by Frank

Re: Netscape 8.0 has been released. by Les

Re: Netscape 8.0 has been released. by Morituri-|-Max

Re: Netscape 8.0 has been released. by Morituri-|-Max

Re: Netscape 8.0 has been released. by Morituri-|-Max

Re: Netscape 8.0 has been released. by bp

Re: Netscape 8.0 has been released. by bp

Re: Netscape 8.0 has been released. by bp

Re: Netscape 8.0 has been released. by bp

Re: Netscape 8.0 has been released. by bp

Re: Netscape 8.0 has been released. by Shenan

Re: Netscape 8.0 has been released. by bp

Re: Netscape 8.0 has been released. by Alias

Re: Netscape 8.0 has been released. by Shenan