Aaron
Sat Sep 02 23:10:13 CDT 2006
I just checked and it looks like it is indeed there.
- Aaron
"Aaron Kelley" <a_kelley@baylor.edu> wrote in message
news:uFWkh5wzGHA.3440@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>I haven't checked myself, I am basing this completely on one of Thurott's
>recent postings that 3.0 is included now! (New to RC1.)
>
>
http://www.winsupersite.com/reviews/winvista_rc1.asp
>
> (Mixed feelings on Thurott, of course, but you'd think the RC1 review
> would contain accurate information. :-P)
>
> - Aaron
>
> "Colin Barnhorst" <colinbarharst(remove)@msn.com> wrote in message
> news:%23Pgw2BvzGHA.1300@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>> .net framework 2.0 is included. .net framework 1.1 is not but will
>> install if needed to support some programs. I have not heard of 3.0
>> being included but elements needed for some development projects probably
>> are.
>>
>> "Aaron Kelley" <a_kelley@baylor.edu> wrote in message
>> news:%23YxA29uzGHA.4204@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>>>I believe .NET Framework 3.0 is included (installed by default) in Vista
>>>RC1?
>>>
>>> - Aaron
>>>
>>> "Colin Barnhorst" <colinbarharst(remove)@msn.com> wrote in message
>>> news:%23bt2FDrzGHA.1040@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>>>> No. Nor is anything called .net framework 3.0 available as an optional
>>>> update through WU.
>>>>
>>>> "Jud Hendrix" <none@none.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:o0cjf21kf2dof9lg158ak0oan6tqn8tpsc@4ax.com...
>>>>> On Sat, 2 Sep 2006 09:45:14 -0600, "Colin Barnhorst"
>>>>> <colinbarharst(remove)@msn.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>It appears that they come down through Windows Update as soon as Vista
>>>>>>RC1
>>>>>>is installed. At least that was the first thing that happeded to my
>>>>>>Vista
>>>>>>x64 RC1 after I logged in the first time.
>>>>>
>>>>> It seems there will be a Net 3.0 beta as well being released at the
>>>>> same
>>>>> time. Did that come down as well?
>>>>>
>>>>> jud
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>