Tony
Tue Nov 29 06:30:11 CST 2005
Quite! They weren't available here six months ago, so you beat me to it.
What is really surprising, is that the 4200+ walks away favorably compared
with saving a rounded $100!
AND, the spending of an extra $150, will largly be wasted.
(Then , of course, you could donate $1.000 to Intel and let them keep their
Extremities)
Tony. . .
"Colin Barnhorst" <colinbarharst(remove)@msn.com> wrote in message
news:uOxDfYH9FHA.740@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
>I came to the conclusion that the 4400+ was the price/performance sweet
>spot about six months ago and I have not regretted the choice one bit.
>
> --
> Colin Barnhorst [MVP Windows - Virtual Machine]
> (Reply to the group only unless otherwise requested)
> "M. Murcek" <mamurcekjr@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
> news:%238LvYxG9FHA.1484@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
>>
http://reviews.cnet.com/4520-10442_7-6389077-1.html?tag=lnav
>>
>
>