Carpadum
Fri Dec 07 09:57:00 PST 2007
Have you tried the HP Universal Print Driver for x64 based systems. This is
a driver that is designed to work with almost all HP printers. We use it on
our x64 print server.
"Alan Morris [MSFT]" wrote:
> there are several x64 photosmart drivers included in Vista x64, these can
> be added remotely from x64 Vista or share the
> \system32\driverstore\filerepositry directory on an x64 installed Vista
> machine. These are all inf based. You will need to also install the
> matching Vista x86 driver if the driver name is different than the one from
> HP
>
> HP Photosmart 2570 series" ;
> "HP Photosmart 2600 series" =
> "HP Photosmart 2700 series" = ,
> "HP Photosmart 3100 series" =
> "HP Photosmart 320 Series" =
> "HP Photosmart 3200 series" =
> "HP Photosmart 330 Series" =
> "HP Photosmart 3300 series"
> "HP Photosmart 370 Series"
> "HP Photosmart 380 Series" = ,
> "HP Photosmart 420 Series" = _
> "HP Photosmart 470 Series" = ,
> "HP Photosmart 7200 Series" =
> "HP Photosmart 7400 Series"
> "HP Photosmart 7800 Series" =
> "HP Photosmart 8000 Series" =
> "HP Photosmart 8100 Series"
> "HP Photosmart 8200 Series" =
> "HP Photosmart 8400 Series"
> "HP Photosmart 8700 Series"
>
> --
> Alan Morris
> Windows Printing Team
> Search the Microsoft Knowledge Base here:
>
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=fh;[ln];kbhowto
>
> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
>
> "Michael R. Mastro II" <MichaelRMastroII@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in
> message news:BC2E791E-5234-4001-BADB-AE1E70E070F0@microsoft.com...
> > It is a Photosmart printer. I downloaded bothe the full package and the
> > network only drivers. I have been trying the network only drivers with no
> > success, though I did try the full package once, and that led to the same
> > thing. I wish that the .exe file just decompressed and left you the .inf
> > files, but it doesn't. They wrote it so it is a whole install package.
> > This
> > has me totally perplexed and I am generally annoyed at this whole
> > situation.
> >
> > "Alan Morris [MSFT]" wrote:
> >
> >> Is this some deskjet device? The laser printers normally have an exe but
> >> they just uncompress the files which include the decorated infs.
> >>
> >> Make sure you get the Network drivers not the full package since there is
> >> architecture specific files.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Alan Morris
> >> Windows Printing Team
> >> Search the Microsoft Knowledge Base here:
> >>
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=fh;[ln];kbhowto
> >>
> >> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
> >> rights.
> >>
> >> "Michael R. Mastro II" <MichaelRMastroII@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote
> >> in
> >> message news:03C769CD-D55F-4522-A5E4-AECD36A7AEB0@microsoft.com...
> >> > Ok I have a good question. I recently upgraded my Servers from Windows
> >> > 2003
> >> > R2 (x86) to Windows 2003 R2 (x64). Now I am having a few problems but
> >> > one
> >> > of
> >> > my biggest problems right now stems from my printers. I am unable to
> >> > add
> >> > the
> >> > printers via Print Management. This is because HP in all their
> >> > wonderful
> >> > wisdom does not make a x64 bit driver disk. Don't ask me why. They
> >> > only
> >> > offer it in a downloadable package. Problem is this is not a .zip file
> >> > which
> >> > would make sense. It is a .exe install program. Now I have been on
> >> > the
> >> > phone with HP for days and have cursed them out for not having a .zip
> >> > file
> >> > of
> >> > the drivers. The install package will not make it through the install
> >> > process because it is stupid and is looking for 2 things, the printer
> >> > to
> >> > be
> >> > hooked up via USB, which they aren't because they are network printers,
> >> > and a
> >> > temp folder that self-implodes as soon as the install program makes it.
> >> > So
> >> > their program is hosed and I let them know that. So my question is
> >> > does
> >> > anyone know away around this to add the x64 bit drivers, without having
> >> > to
> >> > use their stupid program?
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
>
>