Dodgy USB Stick Handling

Tutorials Win: Microsoft Windows Forum

- Previous
  - 1
    - OT - Memtest86 3.4a released yesterday Memtest86 (http://www.memtest86.com/), the memory test utility recommended by many in this NG, has a new update to version 3.4a Click on "Free Download" on the left pane and you will be able to choose your format/version. Changelog doesn't reflect what has changed from v3.4 (Aug 2nd) to v3.4a (Dec 27th). Direct D/L link for ISO version: http://www.memtest86.com/memtest86-3.4a.iso.zip Direct D/L link for installer: http://www.memtest86.com/memtest34a.zip Carlos Tag: Dodgy USB Stick Handling Tag: 54474
  - 2
    - several unknown problems Hi, i have got some problems!!! I have a problem , when i start my windows this log appears C WINDOWS C WINDOWS\system32/oeofc.exe the NTVDM CPU has encountered an illegal instruction CS: 0534 IP: 01c5 OP 63 68 61 7273 CLOSE IGNORE together with that Faryoll.exe has encountered an problem and needs to close!!! Besides many of Critical System proceses have turned on at Task Manager several times-for example( svchost.exe have turned on 5 times ) and of course there are processes that even i dont know about like nvsvc86.exe and if not wrong slrb0ty.exe what the hell is that all ? please help Tag: Dodgy USB Stick Handling Tag: 54448
  - 3
    - Can't get Product updates I have Windows xp Professional Version 2002. I have major problems with MS Explorer and outlook as well. When trying to get online updates the system would not recognize my product key. I have the original package but still its not going through. Please help!!! Tag: Dodgy USB Stick Handling Tag: 54442
  - 4
    - Core 2 processors and XP version We are currently running Optiplex 745's with Core 2 6600 processors. We are looking to create a specification for procuring new PC's soon, probably with Core 2 Duo processors. According to Intel's website, and Wikipedia, both the Core 2 and Core 2 duo are 64 bit processors. Yet, I am almost certain that we are running 32 bit XP, and I am a bit confused as to how this can be. My system info says I have XP version 5.1.2600 SP2 Build 2600. Can someone explain to me what part of this I have wrong? How can 32 bit windows run on a 64 bit processor? Tag: Dodgy USB Stick Handling Tag: 54437
  - 5
    - Visual C++ [any year / version] refuses to install I recently got a friend of mine to construct this PC for me. He bought an OEM version of Vista x64 to put on it, and as such, I'm unable to talk directly to microsoft unless I want to pay like $60 per incident. So, here's my issue: I have two programs which require an updated version of Visual C++: Norton Internet Security and BioShock. I have tried installing both Visual C++ 2005 and 2008, but after I reboot, the programs still give me the same error messages, which, after being chased through tech support for both programs, leads me back to a needed VC++ update. My system specs are: Vista Home Premium x64 1.6GHz Intel Pentium Dual Core Processor clocked at 2.63GHz 4GB (2x2GB) G.SKILL RAM nVidia GeForce 6600 LE 512 [I don't know if you need this much, but it can't hurt =) ] Tag: Dodgy USB Stick Handling Tag: 54433
  - 6
    - Long reboot times Sometimes when I restart it will literally take hours for it come back up. This seems to occur randomly but I have noticed that it definitely happens when I install new software. I can't even get it into safe mode when this happens. I have 64-Bit ultimate Intel Boxdx38bt Motherboard Core 2 Quad 6600 4GB DDR3 Ram Tag: Dodgy USB Stick Handling Tag: 54427
  - 7
    - 64 bit "Windows Washer" I have been using Webroot's Window Washer to keep my traces hidden. They do not make a 64 bity version. does anyone have a suggestion for a similar product in a Vista 64 bit version? Tag: Dodgy USB Stick Handling Tag: 54425
  - 8
    - M I.5 Per secution ' BBC Ne wscasters L ie & De ny Theyr e Watc hing Me MI5. Persecution: BBC Newscasters Lie & Deny They're Watching Me Central to the persecution campaign waged against me for some nine. years now by the. Security Service is their use of the media, and in particular the broadcast media, to make clear to me that I. am under surveillance and being watched within my own. home, even by BBC newscasters while they read the news.. This is really an act of arrogance; MI5 and their tools in the television and radio are. so sure that they can never be caught, that they have many times made explicity clear on broadcast programmes that they. are as capable of seeing me as I. am of seeing the broadcast pictures. Even when they have known. I am taping the programmes they still carry on this practice;. for examples of TVand radio presenters caught "in action", see the Evidence area of. my website. If you wish to reply to. this article...... then please include your name and fax number! I provide. the means for recipients to send me their thoughts on the topics discussed, but. ask that you provide me with your fax number or email address if you require. a response. Also would. you please send not more than one or two pages, if by fax.. Thank-you! It started with. a Newscaster, and it continues with Newscasters today The very first incident in the story started with a. reaction by an ITN newscaster, Sue Carpenter, in June of 1990, almost nine. years ago now. She reacted to what she saw in. my living room at home as she read the news. My mother had brought an apple for me. into the room, whereupon the newsreader smirked and giggled, apparently finding this funny.. I couldn't believe what I was seeing. I carried on watching news and other. television programmes to see if presenters would show. signs of "interactive watching"; to my surprise, this. happened again and again. Unfortunately, I did not have my wits sufficiently about me to videotape. these programmes, and it is now almost. impossible to obtain recordings dating back to 1990. However, I have been. busy recording everything Ive watched the last couple of years, and the taping has yielded some nuggets, which. you will find if you point your Web. browser at the "evidence" area of my website, whose URL address. is given above. Strangely it is not particularly the BBC who are "after me" at the moment (with the exception of occasional. fire from Nicholas Witchell), but that supposed paragon of virtue and. decency Jon Snow of. Channel Four TV News (he actually works for ITN), who once claimed hed turned down MI5s offer of a tax-free salary. I will cover Snows. recent actions in. a future article. BBCs. Hidden Shame The first ever. Usenet post (internet newsgroup article) on the subject of the MI5 bugging / BBC watching occurred, as stated. in a previous article, in early May. 1995. It is reproduced here; Date: Thu May. 4 18:27:24 1995 Newsgroups:. alt.conspiracy Subject: BBC's Hidden. Shame Remember the two-way televisions in George. Orwell's 1984? The ones which watched you. back? Which you could never get rid of, only the sound could be turned. down? Well. the country which brought Orwell into the world has made his nightmare follow into the world after him. Since 1990 the. British have been waging war against. one of their own citizens using surveillance to invade privacy and a campaign of abuse in. the transmitted media in their efforts. to humiliate their "victim". I suppose "BBCs Hidden Shame" is more of a wish. than a fact. It may be hidden, but the BBC and other. media and security organisations seem to have no shame whatever in their anti-social, not to say. criminal, actions. Nor do the general. public, who seem quite happy to parrot the vilest obscenities. without much hesitation or apparently thought. Martyn Lewis, Nicholas Witchell and. the rest Most. of the harassment occurred in 1990-92, when I wasnt making any recordings, and the. BBC wont release copies of current affairs programmes from that period.... so although I can remember there were many. incidents in that time, even many specifics, I cant dig up the actual. programmes to flesh. out the bones. This. year, there has been at least one incident with Nicholas Witchell as newsreader, which I have successfully recorded and. digitized, i.e. converted into a computer Quicktime movie. file. This has not yet found its way. onto my website (Im a busy man, dontcha know) but you can be sure I will. let the readership of these articles know when that clip makes it onto the web. The Witchell clip was. recorded on Saturday 10 April 1999 at 7pm, and shows Witchell. trying to restrain his features from collapsing into a smirk. First. his upper lip quivers for several minutes, then with the non-excuse of a non-joke his entire face twists into. a grin. It looks as if. he finds me so funny, that he allows himself to submerge any pretence at professionalism. in a sea of MI5-inspired sarcasm and harassment. The two BBC newscasters whose reactions to me I can remember most. vividly over. the years are Martyn Lewis and Nicholas Witchell. I can remember thinking years ago that Michael Buerk was also. seeing me at home; and if the. other two are watching then there would be no reason why he wouldnt be doing the same; but in all honesty I cannot remember a single. clear instance. of his reacting through facial or verbal expression to me. I can remember several instances of. Martyn Lewis reacting to what he saw of me, however. In early 1992 I was watching the BBC news. with Lewis on a small black-and-white portable TV at my then home in Oxford. I threw. a term of abuse at Lewis; he flinched, then gave a grin and made. a comment from. which I understood that he had been on my side, but might have changed his mind as a result of. what Id just said to him. And in spring 1991 I. remember Martyn Lewis clearly reacting to what he saw of me at my then. accommodation in Woking, Surrey, by continuing to stare at some fixed point near the. camera after the news had finished - presumably this is where the monitor interactively showing pictures. of my room was. located. Why would BBC and other Newscasters Watch and. Harass Me, Watching Them? This is a very difficult question,. and I dont actually know the answer. It is a matter. of record that the Secret Services are very much part of the Establishment. The. recent exposure of the "MI6 Agent List" on the internet,. and its coverage in the newspapers, reveals how much MI5 and MI6 are recruited from the ranks of. the Establishment. Obviously the relationship. is bi-directional; the Establishment influences MI5/MI6, but the secret services (well, perhaps not so secret now. we know who works for MI6!!!) also influence the machinery. of power and information dissemination i.e.. media in this country. So they must have a lot of covert leverage with. the BBC and ITN. Some of this leverage. is obviously through bribery. It is a matter of record that MI5. tried some years ago to "buy" Jon Snow of Channel Four TV. He. turned them down - obviously they must have approached other media people as well, and from. the lack of other reports of people turning them down, it. may be presumed that some other journalists will have accepted the sugared carrots put before them. Ironically, Jon Snow has. been taking part in the recent "watching" actions against me -. but why he has allowed himself to. be used by the secret services is something which I do not know. Perhaps the Security Service uses blackmail to twist arms of. journalists into co-operating with them? I have always thought there. was something slightly odd about Martyn Lewiss demeanour. At the time of. the Ron Davies "rough trade" scandal. it was reported that MI5 had known all about Davies predilections and the sham of his pretence to be a. happily married man. Perhaps MI5 have been able to dig something. up from Martyn Lewiss private life to blackmail him into acting on their behalf?. And if there wasnt. anything before the "newscaster watching" started then there most certainly is something now..... once theyve started watching, the newscasters. will surely wish their activities to remain covered-up, and co-operate with. the security service. "Newscaster. Watching" Deliberately Constructed to Mimic Schizophrenia Presumably this is the first case. in history of television journalists actually taking part in acts of real-time,. live spying and reacting against one of their viewers. What. you have to understand, though, is that I was quite mentally healthy in June 1990,. certainly relative to November 1992, when after two and a half years of harassment. I was finally admitted to. hospital as an out-patient. MI5 decided from the outset that they would make me mad; they constructed the media harassment to resemble what. would be reported by a person with mental. illness; and then they carried on years of abuse to. inflict on me the condition which they wished to use as an. excuse to cover up their abuses. I sold my portable TV in autumn 1990 and stopped watching. television regularly. I realise now that this may have been a mistake. What. I should have done was to watch TV and listen. to the radio, but tape-record everything and make a note. of what each excerpt meant to me. I would then be in a much stronger position as regards to evidence that I. am now. That is what I. am trying to do now, but unsurprisingly the TV/radio presenters have stopped getting at me, now. they know they are being recorded. When I started publicising my case on internet newsgroups. in 1995, I was met with the disbelief one might expect to be. accorded to a mentally ill person who talks about. "newscaster watching" and media persecution. Some newsgroup participants thought I had started a "troll",. an invention made to obtain a reaction; one bright spark. even suggested a group of psychology students were behind the articles. But most people thought. the articles were symptomatic of derangement - and that is exactly. what MI5 want people to. think. MI5 chose me as a target because I was mildly mentally ill. at the outset in 1990, although I stress my illness then was very mild in comparison with. November 1992, and because they knew that enough abuse would. (a) make me much more seriously ill, and (b) once I was more ill, they would "get away" with a harassment deliberately. constructed to look. like the symptoms of paranoid schizophrenia. Martyn Lewis. Denies & Lies, But Wont in Writing In February 1997 I wrote to BBC Viewer & Listener Correspondence. and asked them to investigate the claim that their newscasters had engaged. in "real-time spying" on me. They replied that they. had asked Martyn Lewis and Michael Buerk whether they had. engaged in such practices, and that they had both made verbal denials to VLC, but. were refusing to put their denials in. writing. To. me it looks as if Lewis and Buerk are happy to lie verbally but not in writing, because written falsehoods would. place them unambiguously in the wrong, whereas they. can try to talk their way out of verbal lies if they are ever caught, or perhaps even deny the. verbal lies completely? If they lie. without shame, then why would they have any shame about future lies about. lying? BBC-VLC also said. that the BBC "would never engage in any form of surveillance activity" such as that described. Clearly. Martyn Lewis and the rest have. lied to their own organisations personnel about their criminal actions. So much for the "objective", "truthful" BBC, a nest. of shabby. liars. Summons against the BBC, for Nuisance caused by Newscaster. Spying In. March 1997 I issued a civil summons against the BBC, seeking injunction against further "newscaster spying",. and token damages for what the BBC had done to me until that date. The purpose of. the summons was to try to "smoke out" the BBC,. since obviously I did not have good evidence which would be necessary for either a. civil or criminal case to be made against them. My. summons was worded as follows; 1. The plaintiff. is and was at all material times residing at [home address]. At some time prior to or during. June 1990, persons of unknown identity entered Plaintiff's premises and. installed concealed television equipment in. said premises. 2. A. campaign of harassment was launched against the Plaintiff by the persons of unknown. identity, which in part took the form of instigating harassment by BBC TV newscasters (including specifically Michael Buerk. and Martyn Lewis) as they read news bulletins, by making. direct and personal comments. to Plaintiff. 3. The campaigns purpose was to. subject Plaintiff to great mental stress and induce mental breakdown. As a result of it. Plaintiff did indeed suffer from. severe mental strain in 1990-97. 4. In order to avoid the mental. strain being caused to him the Plaintiff has been compelled to stop watching BBC TV news. Defendant. therefore committed the tort of private nuisance,. since normal use of home was interfered. with. 5. Plaintiff claims a permanent injunction prohibiting. further nuisance, and damages for nuisance suffered limited to. 5,000. Naturally, my attempt to smoke-out the BBC and its. lying newscasters failed. The BBCs litigation department sought to have. my summons struck out; and they. succeeded in doing so, on the grounds of my action "disclosing no reasonable cause of action". I was also prevented. from issuing. further civil claims against the BBC without leave of the Court.. Apparently litigants-in-person frequently / usually have their claims struck out with this wording, regardless of the merit of. their claims. BBC Suppresses my Claims of "Watching by. Newscasters" BBCs staff magazine Ariel ran my advert "BBC Newsreaders Spying on. my home" for. one issue in the Personal category on 8/July/1997 before it was spotted and axed. by editor Robin Reynolds; please see webpage;. http://www.pair.com/spook/evidence/plaint/ariel.htm Clearly. the BBC will not allow claims of its wrongdoing to be made public in the media. channels it controls. On several occasions people said to my. face that harassment from the TV was happening. On the first day I worked in Oxford, I spent the evening. in the local pub the. Rose and Crown with the company's technical director Ian, and Phil, another employee. Ian made a few references to me. and said to Phil, as if in an aside, "Is he the bloke. who's been on TV?" to which Phil. replied, "Yes, I think so". The reader might think that mere "watching" by newscasters. etc might be a relatively benign happening. But it is. not; it is part of MI5s framework of harassment and lies. On many. occasions the reactions of the BBCs newscasters to me has been in the nature. of sarcasm, implicit contempt and abuse. This is visible in Witchells news. programme mentioned above, where he engages in abuse by laughing at me during his. newsreading. It was particularly visible in. the early period of 1990-92, and as late as Autumn 1993,. when during a Newsnight broadcast Jeremy Paxman interviewed a football person about. soccer hooliganism, and the interviewee gave vent to an unsubtle rant about "theyre idiots,. theyre just idiots, keep up the surveillance". Paxman started grinning, showing he understood. and was taking part in the abuse being perpetrated on. that programme. Conclusion The MI5. Persecution started with harassment by television newscasters, and today harassment by TV and radio presenters still forms. a key part of MI5s activities against me. When this business started. in June 1990 I was in relatively good. health of mind. Years of persecution by the secret police and their mouthpieces in the state-run BBC and other. media eroded my health until. MI5 achieved their aim of seeing me rendered mentally ill in November. 1992. The diagnosis which was forced on me unfortunately and ironically. meant that my reports of the harassment are disregarded, because. the mentally ill are second-class citizens in todays Britain. Yet TV and radio. harassment continues, albeit in a reduced form, despite my taping all the programmes I watch, resulting in my being able to. obtain and demonstrate objectively. on the website instances of media presenters attacking me.. Unfortunately these recorded instances are quite tenuous; I might understand them, the presenters understand what it is theyre. doing, but despite many thousands. of people knowing the truth of the "newscaster watching", the omerta continues and they. continue to refuse to admit the truth. of the matter. It is a terrible indictment of British society that there is. not even one decent person willing to speak out. I look forward to the day when the truth does. finally emerge, and the mass corruption which has allowed the MI5 persecution to take place is finally purged. and the. Establishment criminals caught and appropriately punished. 5413 Tag: Dodgy USB Stick Handling Tag: 54423
  - 9
    - M.I 5-Persecut ion ` Four Years of MI 5 Persecution Post s on I nternet Newsgr oups Four Years of "MI5 Persecution" Posts on. Internet Newsgroups For approximately the first. three years of the MI5 persecution, from June 1990 until late 1992, I kept as quiet as. possible, in the hope that by not reacting, MI5s interest in me would decrease and they would. simply go away of their own accord. This is the sort of behaviour some. people employ against bullies; if. the bullies arent getting a reaction, then they might simply go away and victimize. someone else. Unfortunately, this tactic didnt work. The quieter I. became, the more shrill and hysterical the noise from the. Security Service operatives. For about two years I didnt watch TV news at all. Yet. this only heightened their obsessed fixation; they. continued to follow me wherever I went, they continued to induce harassment. at work by managers and fellow workers, and they continued to encourage me to commit suicide. They seemed to. regard my refusal to react as a crime which they. would have to "put right" by ever more. extreme forms of abuse. Finally, in 1995, I changed tactics radically. Since late 1994. I had had accounts with internet providers in Ontario, Canada. I. discovered the cornucopia of internet newsgroups, on every topic from. consumer electronics, to politics and legal topics, and I. discovered online services such as Compuserve and AOL. In May 1995, I made. the first posting to the conspiracy. newsgroup, on the subject of "BBCs Hidden Shame". BBC's Hidden. Shame The internet newsgroup. discussion, which has now reached its fourth anniversary,. started with an article in alt.conspiracy, which I reproduce here. Date: Thu May 4. 18:27:24 1995 Newsgroups:. alt.conspiracy Subject: BBC's. Hidden Shame Remember the. two-way televisions in George Orwell's 1984? The ones which watched you back? Which you. could never get rid of, only the sound could be turned down? Well the. country which brought Orwell into the world has made his nightmare follow into the world after him. Since 1990 the. British have been waging war against one of their own citizens using surveillance to invade. privacy and a campaign of abuse in the transmitted media in their efforts to humiliate. their "victim". And the most remarkable thing about it. is that what they do is not even illegal - the UK has no laws to protect the privacy. of its citizens, nor does it proscribe harassment or abuse except in the case. of racial abuse. A lot of people in England know. this to be going on, yet so far they have maintained perfect "omerta"; not a sound, not a squeak. has escaped into the English press, and for all. the covert harassment absolutely nothing has come out into the public domain. Have the British gone mad? I think we should be. told At this point, I did. not name MI5 as my persecutors. I was still unsure that they were the. ones responsible for the "psychological terrorism". In followup posts. however I did name them; and the persecutors have never denied the claim; so I think. my guess is valid. (The Security Service Tribunal in 1997 have said "no determination. in your favour was made", but it is a well. established fact that MI5 lies routinely to the Tribunal which has never found in favour of a plaintiff, so no conclusions can. be drawn from. this.) This first post. was made to alt.conspiracy, but further posts were made to the UK-local newsgroups, in particular uk.misc. but also uk.legal and uk.politics (which is now called. uk.politics.misc). Some time ago I tried to take the. battle to the Compuserve forums, UKPOLITICS (which is now called UKCURRENT - current affairs), but my articles. were censored by the forum operators. Such censorship. is impossible on the internet newsgroups. Police Refuse to. Act I have. complained several times to the Metropolitan Police, who have each time refused to. help. From: Green. <Green@guidion.demon.co.uk> Newsgroups:. uk.misc,uk.politics,alt.politics.british,soc.culture.british Subject: Re:. MI5 Persecution: Why Aren't the British Police Doing Their Job? Reply-To:. Green@guidion.demon.co.uk Date: Sun Apr 7 21:13:30. 1996 In. article <DpIE0r.736.0.bloor@torfree.net> bu765@torfree.net. "Mike Corley" writes: >Last Easter (1995) I went into the local police station in. London and spoke to >an officer about the harassment against me. But. I couldn't provide tangible >evidence; what people said, in. many cases years ago, is beyond proof, and >without something to support my statements I cannot expect a. police officer to >take. the complaint seriously. This in itself dos not suggest that the police have it in. for you. The old bill operates. on extremely tight spending limits forced on them by that pillock Michael Howard, and without evidence, they often have higher priorities than. chasing something that cannot go. to court. I doubt that the police are. actually being leant on, but they probably realise that if they. looked into this, they would be leant on hard. The met always stays away from anything that. looks like it has Defence, Security or secret service interest already, because they realise that they are below. these government agencies in the general pecking. order. If. I walked into my local nick and complained that MI5 were snooping on me, they would show me the door without even looking at my evidence, because that bored desk. seargant with only. five years to go before he retires doesn't want to start fucking about with somebody who has incurred the wrath of. Stella Rimington. He would rather deal with the lost dogs and driving licence producers, eat his cheese and pickle sandwiches and. piss off home at the end of his shift than have. some high ranking spook having a go at his boss and getting him a. bollocking. In short, you have earned much sympathy but. little surprise. Just remember that saying about. the enemy of your enemies. Most recently, I. wrote in March 1999 to Charing Cross Police Station CID. They did not acknowledge or reply to my. letter. When I phoned them up, the detective. Id written to treated me to a sadly not unusual display of police bigotry,. with an uneducated rant about "your paranoid rubbish". It would be nice to think that such uneducated bigotry is. something other than wholly typical of police behaviour, but unfortunately that. is an illusion that is rapidly. dispelled. Uncorruptible Jon Snow. of Channel Four News From previous articles the reader will know what I think. Jon Snow has recently been watching me while he reads Channel. Four News in the evening. Recently I digitized a few moments of one. such broadcast, where his. face twists into a smile, without there being anything in the news broadcast to cause merriment. Here is a usenet post from some time. ago on MI5s "bought and paid for" tools in. the so-called "free" press. Peter Harding. (harding@ermine.ox.ac.uk) wrote: :. I was at speakers' corner on Sunday. There was one chap who was bellowing : about something or other, I don't know what, but one thing. he said to : someone caught. my ear: : "BBC, MI5, same. thing." Can't. disagree with that sentiment. Wasn't it. documented that MI5 sometimes "bought" journalists and broadcasters? I remember reading a report by some jouralist who had been offered an. extra tax-free income. by MI5 to become their covert mouthpiece, and had refused. ............................................................................. > : >mouthpiece, and. had refused. >. : > : It was Jon Snow of. Channel 4. > > Was it reported in any of the. papers? It. has been reported several times. The most recent was in Private Eye, a few months back. As I recall they also wanted. information from him; journalists would be a natural choice. for members of the Security Service and the Secret Intelligence Service for information. sources. > It might be interesting to see what he. had to say regarding their > attempt. to recruit him. He was most concerned. that many others would have accepted such an offer. However, we can probably make an educated. guess as to some of those who accepted:. Nigel West (Rupert Allason, MP) and Chapman Pincher would come near to the top. of the list. -- \/ David Boothroyd. Socialist and election analyst. Omne. ignotum pro magnifico. British Elections and Politics. at http://www.qmw.ac.uk/~laws/election/home.html I. wish I was in North Dakota. Next General Election must be before 22nd May '97 The House of Commons now : C 324, Lab 272,. L Dem 25, UU 9, PC 4, SDLP 4, SNP 4, UDUP. 3, Ind 1, Ind UU 1, Spkrs 4. Government majority = 1. Telephone Tate 6125. Corrupt Security Service agents steal millions. from taxpayers Money is. of course a factor in the grand equation which is the MI5 persecution. It costs money for the Security. Service to "buy" people in the media etc. But that is only. a small part of their expenditure of taxpayers resources. Most of the expenditure. is directly on the salaries if the agents involved; and in this post I. put forward the theory that MI5 are trying to draw out their involvement for as long. as possible, very cynically, to maximise their income and. line their own pockets. At each stage they have tried to pretend that. I am something out of the ordinary. Either I was very stupid ("he's an idiot") or very clever ("he's like. a genius"). Either I was a threat to Western civilization (Levin once referred to. me as the next Hitler) or I. was completely defenceless ("a soft toy"). Now, it should be. obvious to any person with common-sense that I am not out of the ordinary in any way. I have an IQ which. is average for the Web, I am racially white European, and there are plenty of other people with schizophrenia or epilepsy. out there who haven't. been targeted for MI5 attention, so why me? I think the answer is that the MI5 agents who harass me have cynically exploited. the situation. by painting me as extraordinary in order to assure themselves of well-paid employment funded by the ordinary British. taxpayer. To put it bluntly, they are stealing millions. of pounds from the taxpayer to feed their own pockets. This assertion is supported by the observation that it's the same agents. who are doing the harassment.. Six months ago in a local hospital I was harassed by someone whose face I had. seen (he had stared straight at me aggressively, at the time I just thought it was some nutter but it turns out he was one of "them") aboard. a KLM flight a couple of years ago. It's presumably been. the same people most of the time. I've seen the way contractors act. when they don't want their positions terminated. Would these agents really. want to lose their well-paid employment harassing me? Presumably they are promising their bosses. a "breakthrough" (ie my demise) real-soon-now and have been for the last seven years, while all the while. these MI5 agents skim millions off. the taxpayer. I wouldn't. mind a job like that. Perhaps if I persecute myself a little bit, like standing in front. of a mirror and shouting mindless obscenities, do you reckon I'd get a. slice of the caky Service Tribunal. This year Nick Brooks, current Tribunal Secretary, confirmed to me that he could not. think of a single case where the Tribunal had found in favour of. a complainant. Here is my usenet post from. two years ago. Subject: MI5: "It wasn't. us" Newsgroups:. uk.misc,uk.legal Organization: Toronto. Free-Net "The. Security Service Tribunal have now investigated your complaint and have asked me to inform you that no determination in your favour has. been made on your. complaint." Signed ER. Wilson, Tribunal Secretary Well. that's a relief then. All that spamming for nothing eh. Gaw blimey, if they say they're not. doing it then it can't be them, can it? In a recent. letter to Mr Brooks I expressed the opinion that the Tribunal were unable to fulfil their responsibilities in the. face of MI5 falsehoods.. Nevertheless, I do intend to make another complaint to the Tribunal in the. near future, despite the Tribunal appearing to be a toothless. watchdog. Discrimination against. a Unit Minority MI5 have been. very clear in their instructions as to what I should do.. They have openly shouted at me the word "suicide", and also from the other abuse it is clear that they. want my existence terminated. This point is covered in more. detail in a previous article. The following post describes the xenophobic nature. of MI5s campaign against me. They have refined their bigotry down to a unit minority,. yet they make use of the discrimination against. the mentally ill which is a feature of current British. society. Subject:. Re: MI5 says "Kill Yourself" Newsgroups:. uk.misc,uk.legal,uk.politics.misc,uk.media References:. <zlsiida.4248.3258FE24@fs1.mcc.ac.uk> <53eeev$cmg@axalotl.demon.co.uk> Organization: Toronto. Free-Net Distribution: iain@hotch.demon.co.uk. (Iain L M Hotchkies) wrote: >Indeed. If you've ever had a 'conversation' with someone. suffering >from florid schizophrenia,. you'll know how difficult it can be to >'argue' with. them. I don't have florid symptoms. But I'm. in a difficult situation, because those people who don't know, aren't going to believe, and those. who do, they just go along with the crowd. It's. never a good idea to go against the grain, and the grain here is defined by interests. in the establishment and the media. Even people who could say. out loud what was happening won't, because then there's a risk that they'll be seen as traitors and. ostracised. Usually. this type of 'hidden abuse' is racial and targetted at a racial minority. within a country. You keep the minorities out of the good jobs, but you don't admit discrimination exists.. It happens everywhere, not just in Britain. The persecution that is going on now. is in reality a refined form of racism. Instead of "nigger". it's "nutter", and abusing the mentally ill is still socially acceptable today. In 50 years it might not be, but. today there isn't any social or. legal sanction against it. So really they've refined racial harassment down to a minority of one.. The words may be different, but the methods. are the same. 3943 Tag: Dodgy USB Stick Handling Tag: 54422
  - 10
    - M I-5 Per secution ' M I5 Was te T axpayer Mi llions on P ointless Hate-Camp aign MI5 Persecution Update: Friday 30. April, 1999 If You. Intend To Reply, Please Read This Please.... keep your response to one. page!. Faxes over a page or two will be deleted without being. read. Somewhere. between 0 and 100% The last few days there have been no clear recordable instances. of abuse. However, while travelling on the Underground, while walking. around near my home and going to friends homes, I am constantly troubled. by thoughts that those people over there might be about to get at me;. that the couple sitting in the opposite seats laughing are in. fact laughing at me; et cetera,. et cetera. A comment by a scientist. to the BSE inquiry sticks in my mind. He described. the possible scale of the epidemic as "between 0% and 100%". It might not. be happening, it might not happen at all, to any discernable degree.... or it might be total.. Without clear recording, which seems to have become impossible the last couple of weeks,. there is no way of knowing whether the harassment really is continuing, whether we. have entered a temporary hiatus, or whether perhaps it has perhaps stopped. for now. But for the time being I think there arent any reasons to. dicontinue these faxes. I only re-started them six weeks ago in response to a. resumption of MI5 harassment; and. I think I will need to be more convinced of absence of persecution before I discontinue my. complaints. The Newscasters are. still watching In the last few weeks there have been. at least a couple of fairly overt instances. of "interactive watching" by newscasters. I reported this in a previous. "MI5 Persecution Update". These instances are really very rare compared to. 1990-91, when there were many dozens of such occurrences. Undoubtedly the reduction is. due to my practice. of videotaping everything I see. Recently I had the opportunity of showing this years "happenings" (Jon Snow/Nicholas. Witchell) to my psychiatrist, and he agreed that in both cases the. newscasters were expressing merriment without visible cause, and that. objectively it might be possible for my claims. to be true - although of course other people reported similar thoughts to him, and. this thinking is usually a symptom of. illness. Read About the MI5 Persecution on. the World Wide Web The March 1998 issue (number 42) of .net. Magazine reviews the website describing it as an. "excellent site". Since August 11, 1996 over 50,000 people have browsed. this website. You are encouraged to read the. web pages which include a FAQ (frequently asked questions) section outlining. the nature of the persecutors, their methods of. harassment through the media, people at work and among the. general public an evidence section, which carries audio and video clips of. media and workplace harassment, rated according to. how directly I think they refer to me objective descriptions of the state security agencies. involved scanned texts of the complaints I have. made to media and state security agencies. involved posts which have been made. to netnews over the last four years on this topic Keith Hill. MP (Labour - Streatham), my elected representative, as ever refuses. to help. MI5 Waste. Taxpayer Millions on Pointless Hate-Campaign Recently I was talking to an independent. observer about the nature and purpose of the perceived campaign. of persecution against me. The person I spoke to, a. highly intelligent man, said he was struck by the utter pointlessness of the perceived campaign against me.. He also said that, if my theories were in fact true, many people would have. to be involved, in the surveillance itself, and in the technical side of the. delivery of information from my home to TV studios for example,. if the "interactive watching" were happening as described. He. voiced these thoughts without any prompting from me; but. both I and other observers had arrived at pretty much the same conclusions, some years. ago. I. saw a team of four men at Toronto Airport in 1993 To carry out the surveillance alone, full-time, would employ. four or five men, or their equivalent in. terms of man-hours. Each man would "work" an eight-hour shift, so you would need. at least three men doing the surveillance, plus a connecting link / manager. An indicator. that this estimate is correct arrived in 1993, when I. was accosted by one of a group of four men at Toronto Airport; he said,. laughing, "if he tries to run away well find him". Plainly these were the men who had been. involved in the intrusive surveillance of me for the. preceding three years. On other occasions, I have seen the same man on two or. three occasions. On one such occasion, at Ottawas. Civic Hospital in November 1996; he gave his name to the doctor as "Alan Holdsworth" or some. such; my hearing is not very good sometimes. and I am not sure of the surname, although I am sure "Alan" was his first name. I saw exactly the same man again in Ottawa,. at the airport,. in July 1998. Obviously, other people must be "working" with this person; he would not be the sole agent employed. in this case. Usenet readers views. on the Cost to MI5 of Running the Campaign Here's what. a couple of other people on internet newsgroups / Usenet (uk.misc) had. to say regarding the cost of running such an operation... PO: >Have some sense, grow up and smell reality. What you are talking. about PO: >would take loads of planning, tens of thousands of pounds. and lots of PO: >people involved in the planning, execution and maintenance. of it. You PO: >must have a very high opinion of yourself to think. you are worth it. and...... PM: >But why? And why you? Do you realize how much it would cost. to keep PM: >one person under continuous. surveillance for five years? Think about PM: >all the man/hours. Say they _just_ allocated a two man. team and a PM: >supervisor. OK., Supervisor's salary, say, #30,000 a year.. Two men, PM: >#20,000 a year each. But they'd. need to work in shifts -- so it would PM: >be six men at. #20,000 (which with on-costs would work out at more like PM: >#30,000 to the. employer.) PM:. > PM: >So, we're talking #30,000 x. 6. #180,000. plus say, #40,000 for the PM: >supervisor.. #220,000. Then you've got the hardware involved. And PM: >any transcription that needs doing. You don't think the 'Big. Boss' PM: >would listen to hours and hours. of tapes, do you. PM:. > PM: >So, all in all, you couldn't actually do the job for much. less than PM: >a. quarter million a year. Over five years. What are you doing that makes PM: >it worth the while of the state to. spend over one and a quarter million PM: >on. you? Those are pretty. much the sort of calculations that went through my head once I stopped. to consider what it must be costing them to run this operation. At the very least, a quarter million. a year - and probably much more, given the intrusive and human-resource-intensive. methods employed. Times nine years. Equals well over. two million pounds - and probably. much, much more. Its wasteful for someone. with my skills to be unemployed The wastefulness of the MI5. campaign against me is not just that of futile expenditure on their side. It is also. extremely wasteful for someone with my talents to be. unemployed and on a disability pension. I am highly qualified in numerate disciplines, yet am. unable to work, specifically because of the MI5 hate-campaign against. me. It is a terrible waste of resources for a supposedly efficient economy like that of the UK. to be squandering the talents of. a skilled and capable worker. I made every effort to remain in employment for as long. as I could, but ultimately I was. defeated by MI5s employment of massive resources specifically targeted on my workplaces with. the sole aim of seeing me evicted from those workplaces. You might expect this sort of. behaviour from the Stasi or some. other secret police force in a communist country where labour. is cheap, and the governments aim on seeing its citizens confined;. but for a supposedly free and efficient economy like Britains, the wastefulness resulting both directly and indirectly. from the Security Services activities is. simply criminal, and should never be allowed. The international dimension means the. costs are multiplied many times overoer had any sense, then. they have surely taken leave of them over the last nine. years. Four years of persecution. in Canada The persecution. re-started within less than five minutes of my arrival in Canada, as documented. above, and in the "frequently asked questions" article on the. website. The words, "if he tries to run away well find him" spoken by one. of the harassers at Toronto Airport are now imprinted on. my mind. A. year later I emigrated to Canada, intending to find a job and settle there, hoping that MI5s interest in me might dim. with time. I did manage to find work there, but. my hopes of avoiding Security Service interest were ground into dust. As detailed above, I saw. the same man in November 1996 and July 1998, both times. in Ottawa. Apart from these encounters, there were numerous incidents between 1994 and 1998 of harassment,. of an identical nature and in most. cases using identical words to what had occurred in the UK. It became quite clear to me. that the permanent surveillance and harassment operation which. MI5 had subjected me to in England was. being continued. For a team of four or five men to be employed overseas must. cost a lot more than if they operate in their home country. And for MI5 to. continue the operation for a period of over four years, continuously, must. cost many hundreds of thousands of pounds. This confirms my. belief that the state. is funding the campaign against mehat the Security Service receives current annual. funding of #160M. Divided by 1850 staff, works out at #86,000. But the. unit annual cost of each "watcher" must be much higher than this, especially given the frequently. mobile and overseas nature of their. actions of the last few years. A very conservative figure might be a little over #100,000 pa for each of a team of five people,. or half a million pounds per year. For nine years, so far. So the. most conservative estimate of the surveillance element alone is perhaps four or five. million pounds. since 1990. This guesstimate is of course theoretical - I am not. privy to inside details of how. MI5 split their funding. But to take some other examples, the cost of a US counter-surveillance specialist per. day is USD 5,000.. Even if the agents permanently assigned to me are not of this calibre - even if they employ specialists when. difficult work planting bugs etc is encountered - their salary and support costs must. still be very high. The individual agents are doing well. for themselves as they are well-paid to exercise psychopathic instincts which in any. sane society would see them in prison; but the taxpayers who must. fund this terribly wasteful exercise are being. "done" out of hundreds of thousands of pounds each. year. It must be. emphasised that the above estimates are highly conservative. Besides the surveillance operation, it. must carry a high cost in man-hours to propagate covert slanders through the. population; to setup and maintain the "interactive watching" links to TV and. radio stations,. which these organisations continue desparately to "lie and deny"; and. to induce antipathy in co-workers which would not otherwise exist. Why they are wasting Millions of Pounds. on a "Nobody from South London" As remarked in the prologue to. this article, it is really most extraordinary that the Security Service spends a. chunk of its budget, every year for nine years so. far, on a meaningless campaign against a "nobody from South London". That they are spending such a large. amount of money has been confirmed to me on several occasions,. usually by oblique references. to "its costing this country millions". The supposed "logic" behind the persecution is that MI5 wish to. avoid their harassment of me, and the involvement of the UK media, to be. made public; yet as the reader will appreciate that is a. circular argument, "theyre doing it because they. want to keep it secret and avoid humiliation for themselves and their. country" begs the question, "why did they start doing it in the first place?", to. which in truth I myself do not know the answer. Plainly MI5 with its rich budget can afford half. a million pounds a year to waste on a "nobody from South. London". Some time ago I was talking to a British. surveillance professional on Compuserve who told me "this work costs a lot of money and is usally because the person. I am following has done something (usually criminal) to warrant all this. money and time being spent." Yet in this particular case it is plainly not the. "victims fault" that the harassment is taking place. The. hate-campaign against me is completely the creation of the. obsessive psychologies of the MI5 agents who have made themselves my persecutors; it. is obviously a "personal" campaign for them, and. for years they misuse taxpayer funding to feed their insane,. unnatural and fixated fantasies. 2473 Tag: Dodgy USB Stick Handling Tag: 54421
  - 11
    - M'I-5 P ersecution C omparing th e MI5 Persec ution wit h Germ an Fin al Soluti on MI5. Persecution Update: Friday 16 April, 1999 If You Intend To Reply, Please. Read This Please.... keep your response to one. page!. Faxes over a page or two will be deleted. without being read. BBC newscaster Nicholas Witchell cant. stop himself laughing During 1990-91 there were very many instances of. "interactive television" where newscasters and other TV presenters. saw on a screen before them. what was happening in my home, and reacted, frequently by laughing at me. During this period I unfortunately did not. record these programmes. For the last year or two, I. have been recording everything I watch, and there has been a drastic. decrease in such incidents. However, on. occasion, television presenters do still engage in "interactive watching" and react to what. they see. This has been evident with Jon Snow of Channel Four News recently. - a particularly interesting case,. since it has been established that he cannot be corrupted by money (it is well-documented that MI5. offered him a tax-free salary and he turned them down). I wonder what device MI5 are using. to encourage him to do the "interactive. watching"? On Saturday 10 April 1999. at 7pm, Nicholas Witchell on BBC2 News reacted when he saw that I was watching the. programme, and I have his reactions stored safely on videotape. I have watched this tape several times. and I am entirely confident that my evaluation of his reactions is. correct. For several minutes his upper. lip quivered in mirth as he attempted to keep a straight face. Then finally his self-control. evaporated through the excuse of. a weak joke and his face collapsed into a grin. The strange thing. is that I dont know why he was laughing at me, what I had done recently to "deserve" to be. laughed at. The MI5 persecutors usually manage to invent some justification as to. why people should laugh at and/or abuse me ("hes an X", "it was so funny". etc), so Mr Witchell could have been laughing. for any number of reasons. Perhaps he found the views I have been expressing. in these articles amusing? I suppose if youre paid enough. money and ordered to laugh then even the most innocuous thing becomes. funny. Jon Snow of Channel Four News. cant stop himself smirking, either. On 12 February 1999 I was watching Channel Four. News presented by Jon Snow. As usual, I. was recording the programme, so that if anything out of the ordinary happened,. Id be able to go back and watch it again. Now, Jon Snow, by his own claim,. is uncorruptible. He says he turned down an offer of a substantial tax-free salary. from MI5 - they wanted to make him their. mouthpiece, and he told them where to get off. So you will be most surprised to. learn that Jon Snow "interactively watched" me. that evening, and on many other evenings. Approximately fifteen. minutes into the programme, he announced that the US President would be making a. live appearance at about 7.30pm; I looked at the clock on the mantelpiece; and Snow saw me. looking at the clock, and visibly tried to suppress a. smirk. Uncorruptible, are. you, Mister Snow? If not money, then why are you watching me, Mister Snow? Are they forcing you to watch me? Cant you. turn the monitor off,. Mister Snow? Keith Hill MP (Labour. - Streatham), my elected representative, as ever refuses. to help. Comparing the. MI5 Persecution with German "Final Solution" It might seem offensive to. compare the mass murder of millions of civilians in wartime. with the peacetime persecution of merely one person. Yet the comparison. has been coursing through my mind for several years now, because the brutality of German intent to "sub-humans". is very much comparable to the brutality of British. intent to someone they vituperate. and term "not up to British standards". The methods may differ, but the persecutors. mindset is the same. The Germans first targeted the. mentally disabled, too During. WW2 millions of ethnic Russians, Poles, Jews, mentally ill, gypsies and other minorities were rounded up. and murdered in purpose-built camps by the German regime, in. the name of "racial superiority". Fifty years on, the British Secret Police, MI5, instituted a campaign of. mass hysteria;. but in their cowardice, limited their activities to one single victim. It is. instructive to note that the early German "cleansing" effort was directed primarily not at Jews, but at the mentally ill.. The Nazis set up the T4 project in the. thirties to "cleanse" away 70,000 mentally disabled people, including schizophrenics and epileptics.. After WW2 the Jews with their media influence. used the reaction from the holocaust to roll back anti-semitism. in the Western countries; however, the mentally ill are today still. a persecuted group in the modern Western world as they were under the Nazis (the current Jewish home. secretary in the UK intends to bring in laws for incarceration without any criminal charge for. some mentally. ill people - he protects his own minority, but does nothing for the other minorities in todays society), and this. continuing bias forms a central cause for. the current acts of persecution in the UK. Widespread knowledge. of what is happening to the "un-British" minority In both the German persecution. of the thirties and early forties, and the current British persecution, many, many people. are well aware of whats happening. There is. widespread complicity through inaction of populace; and in. a substantial proportion of the mainstread population, the persecution had/has widespread enthusiastic support;. yet in both the German case. in the 1940s and the British today, the existence of persecution is a mass secret which must be never admitted. out loud. In the recent Lawrence case this "secret bigotry" has been. termed "institutionalised. racism", and that is a very good word for what the British are doing. today The persecutory attitudes and omerta regarding them are so deeply ingrained in the national psyche that they. define the national. mood During WW2 many Germans knew minorities. were disappearing, and through inaction quietly condoned their government's mass. murder of "un-German" minorities and inferior "foreigners"; and in. the 1990s, similarly, many English people know what. the MI5 British Secret Police have. been doing, and not only condone it, but actively take part, because of xenophobia. against the "un-British" unit minority that is the target of "British" actions. This attitude by the British. persecutors has been made explicit through the words "he's. not up to British standards"; the British seem. to have found their very own "untermenschen" to victimise. Why these obsessive. "holy wars" happen This. type of aggression occurs when the majority is threatened or humiliated in some way, economically,. militarily or culturally. In pre-WW2 Germany the threat was primarily. economic and military, following Germany's humiliating defeat in. the first world war and the reparations it was forced to. pay. In modern Britain, one might guess that the majority English who are behind the persecution feel pressured. by the swiftly diminishing. status of Britain in the world, and the rapidly increasing coloured colonisation of their country, which in time will see. the ethnic English a minority in their own land, and their. more antisocial elements, unable to reply to the obvious. threat, instead project their aggression onto. another, weaker, unit minority In both. cases there is a whiff of "holy war" or irrational obsession with the persecution. Certainly the German. behaviour fifty years ago bordered on the not-quite-sane, and the current British behaviour towards. their chosen victim is. strongly tinged with a leave-taking of reason. And the choices open to the victims are the same, since MI5 will never allow me. to escape. them, "if he tries to run away we'll find him", just like the commandant of Auschwitz telling. the new arrivals, "the only escape is through. the chimney". The Victim Will Destroy. Us if We Dont Destroy Him First The persecutors propaganda is the same. Fifty years. ago the Germans said, "if we don't do it to the. Jews then the Jews will do it to us"; and MI5's propaganda in the. early nineties concentrated on their victim as a "monster" aesome. "untermenschen" minority. "We are decent fellows" say the Brutal. Persecutors During the course of. researching this article I read part of the very interesting book, "Hitler - A. Study in Tyranny", by Alan Bullock. This volume contains a quote from Himmler on the. "Final Solution"; "Most of you know what it means when a. hundred corpses are lying side by side, or five hundred or one thousand. To. have stuck it out, and at the same time .... to have remained decent fellows, that is. what has made us hard. This. is a page of glory in our history which has never been written and is. never to be written." In the MI5 persecution, too, there is a thread of deliberate brutality. to the sick and vulnerable, while. the persecutors maintain that "we are decent fellows". There. is almost a conscious schizophrenia in the self-attitudes of the Security Service. operatives and those in the public who they employ against me, which reflects the contradiction evident. in the German. attitude above. On the one hand, they stoop to the lowest and most. base behaviour; yet at the same time, the MI5 operatives tell themselves that since they are civilised British people, then. surely they must by definition be "decent fellows". Any indecency is made the fault. of the victim; "hes making us. persecute him, so we need feel no guilt". Yet the. conduct is atypical of the way these peoples see their normal modes of behaviour.. Befslaughter was not typical of normal German behaviour up to that point. Similarly, the current. MI5 abuse goes against the grain of British self-image as being "reserved" and. "decent", since they are. using terms of abuse which are common among blacks and other supposedly less-developed races, but not among the. English. Conclusion The ultimate. aim of both persecutions is the humiliation and physical extinction of the persecuted group.. The Germans did this in a very direct way; the British Secret. Police MI5 are acting indirectly and relying on self-extinction of their target, because. in peacetime and in the current somewhat false climate of. "political correctness" more direct methods are impossible.. If MI5 undertook more direct action the mass "omerta" would be broken. I have written this article with sincerity to show how a. historically recent persecution in another. country parallels what is being done in this country today. In both cases, the. evil-doers are of their countries establishments,. and rely on widespread tacit support to maintain the persecution and omerta around. it. While the holocaust was undoubtedly the greater evil, it is important to be. aware of the fact that had the Germans not been defeated fifty. years ago, their plans would have gone through to total completion. In Britain today no force threatens the. "permanent government" of which the Security Service forms a part; and. it looks very unlikely that the. wrongs perpetrated by the MI5 secret police will ever be revealed to public view, and the British secret state brought. to justice for its. evil actions. 1003 Tag: Dodgy USB Stick Handling Tag: 54420
  - 12
    - Win2K8 Server Newsgroup(s) Is anyone aware of the presence of a Windows Server 2008 newsgroup ? I am familiar with the TechNet forum but have been searching in vain for a newsgroup. Anything out there ? Info would be greatly appreciated. Thanks - and - happy holidays to all. ................ John. Tag: Dodgy USB Stick Handling Tag: 54417
  - 13
    - Is Windows XP 64bit going down the way OS/2 did? My favorite OS was OS/2. I like Windows XP 64 and it looks to me as if it's going to disappear just like OS/2 did because of lack of hardware support. Isn't that a shame? :( Tag: Dodgy USB Stick Handling Tag: 54401
  - 14
    - bios update causes reactivation Hi. I just flashed my BIOS to the latest version and now my Vista 64 bit claims there has been a hardware change and I need to reactivate vista... when I click on Ã¤ctivate over the internet"it says my key is already in use.. This is the only computer that this Vista is installed on and I'm not to happy that this has happened... what should I do? is this going to happen every time I flash my BIOS? System specs: Motherboard: EVGA 122-CK-NF68 CPU: Intel Q6600 RAM: Corsair TwinXPC800 4GB Video: 2 x EVGA GeForce 8800GTS SLI mode HDD: 2 x WD Raptors 76GB in raid config OS: Windows Vista Premium 64 bit OEM Tag: Dodgy USB Stick Handling Tag: 54396
  - 15
    - Dell Precision Windows xp64 SCSI 2nd hard drive problems. I have a Precision 670 Dell computer that is running Windows XP 64. The Dell has a Seagate ST3146854LW 136GB SCSI drive in it. The system has been running fine although I am running out of disk space and will also be moving over to Windows Vista x64 Ultimate shortly. I purchased a new (From Seagate) ST3300655LW 300GB SCSI hard drive and added it to my system. The 136GB original drive is SCSI ID 0 and the new 300GB drive is SCSI ID 1. The new drive is the exact same line of drive as my original one, it's just a larger version. My system boots up fine and Disk Management sees the new drive. I created a single partition the same size as the original drive that came with my computer (136GB). The partition formats fine from within Disk Management. Formated NTFS, Default Allocation Unit size. Not using quick format and not using compression. Once the drive is formatted I am able to copy files to it but only a few ones. Any attempt to copy lots of files (20+) results in the drive hanging and locking up the computer. No problems seem to be occuring with the old drive. Suggestions? Tag: Dodgy USB Stick Handling Tag: 54389
  - 16
    - Setting up mulitboot with Ultimate 32- & 64-bit Can I install a multiboot set-up with Vista Ultimate-32 and Ultimate-64? As Vista Ultimate is on the same machine but different partitions I can not use both versions at the same time so therefore can I not use the same product key for both installs? FYI, I purchased the full version and not the upgrade version. I have followed the instructions for "Install more that one operating system (multiboot)" in Windows Help and Support. Ater installing Ultimate-32 I ran Windows Update and then installed Norton and all my other programs and related documents. After a fresh reboot running Ult-32 I placed the Ult-64 DVD in the drive, double-clicked on the drive and received the following error message: Windows Setup Setup can not run on this version of the Operating System. To install Windows please try booting from the install media. Background: Originally purchased and installed Ult-64 so I could gain access to more installed RAM for video editing. But after loading all my software and data found that I could not install Media Center as Ult-64 could not "find" my tuner. After spending hours searching as well as speaking with HP customer service it was determined that there were no 64-bit drivers for my tuner card (ViXS PureTV-U 48B0) so if I wanted to use Media Center I could only use Ult-32. They suggested that I might want to try a multiboot and install Ult-64 on a separate partition and then boot with Ult-64 when I want to edit and use Ult-32 the rest of the time. As I will only use Ultimate-64 for video editing occasionally, this sounded like a reasonable suggestion but have not been able to install Ult-64. Your help and advice is appreciated! Tag: Dodgy USB Stick Handling Tag: 54380
  - 17
    - Where is the software support for 64 bit Windows? It's been a little over one year that I've been using XP64. It is apparent to me by now that hardware drivers are hard to find for this 64bit OS furthermore, I have NOT seen any software boxes in the retail stores that claim to support Windows XP 64 bit. After Windows 2000, XP, comes Vista (the 32 bit version) so there is no mention whatsoever about XP 64 bit or Vista 64 bit. Photoshop CS runs on XP but WILL NOT run on XP 64 It seems that Photoshop CS2 will run on XP 64 but the retail box doesn't say so. Some people do have luck running these types of high-priced software on xp64 bit and Vista ultimate but why won't the manufacturers admit one way or the other? Personally, I like the 64 bit version of Windows XP64 - even though it seems to me that even Microsoft doesn't fully support it (no 64 bit flash, and no 64bit IE software update, it reverts to the 32 bit version for that to which I say horse manure). My question is: what the hell is going on with this 64bit nonsense? By the time everyone wakes up and supports this 64 bit hot air, we'll be ready for 128 and maybe 256 bit. Microsoft, whasssup?? Tag: Dodgy USB Stick Handling Tag: 54375
  - 18
    - Problems with ADI AD1888 Sound This solution is for AD1888 Audio Chipsets with Windows Vista x64 Only ============================================== I have been searching for some time for a driver for the ADI AD1888 Onboard Soundmax surround sound card on my ASUS K8V-MX Motherboard. After a great deal of time trying to fix the problem of sound being erratic crackling excessive echo etc. reading a number of reviews of the motherboard stating that the onboard sound was AC-97 Compatible, I had the idea of trying an AC-97 Driver package for Windows Vista x64 (64bit) at 1st I thought that it did not work as I heard nothing from the speakers, but I had the Audio icon in the taskbar stating :- Volume : 60 Speakers Realtec AC-97 Audio for Via (R) Audio Controller I switched the Speaker plug to the Line out and hey presto! I now have decent sound but not surround support. If you have a similar problem with Vista64 you can obtain the driver package at http://ut200x.ath.cx/vista-x64/AC97-Vista64.zip size: 29mb Tag: Dodgy USB Stick Handling Tag: 54373
  - 19
    - Merry Christmas Merry Christmas everyone!!.A safe & happy holiday! Daylight Savings Guy look at this way,you are never in da dark very long.{:-)) Your electric bill must be small......have a good one. Tag: Dodgy USB Stick Handling Tag: 54372
  - 20
    - Getting started I would like to try out this edition of Windows XP to take advantage of dual processing and threading. The problem is that the hardware drivers seem to be built for Windows XP (i.e. there is no specific mention of support for the x64 edition). Are drivers that run on Win XP 32 Bit compatible with the 64 bit edition? Tag: Dodgy USB Stick Handling Tag: 54356
  - 21
    - ISO burner for XP64 Is there an ISO image burner (preferably free) for XP64? I tried InfraREcorder but all I got is coasters. Thanks. Tag: Dodgy USB Stick Handling Tag: 54355
  - 22
    - OT - Daylight savings in Argentina This is not specific to Vista x64 but to all MS OS's. After zillions of years with no Daylight Savings policy in Argentina, our brand new female president Cristina has decreed that we are going to have a Daylight Savings policy by a law in our country. Effective 0 hour of Dec 30 until 0 hour March 16, 2008 the clocks will be advanced 1 hour meaning that we will be moving from GMT -3 to GMT -2. Can MS release an update (I have seen updates for other countries lately) for Argentina? BTW this clock change is almost meaningless in the place where I live. Sun comes out at 4:00 AM and goes out close to midnight in summer. :) Carlos ---------------- This post is a suggestion for Microsoft, and Microsoft responds to the suggestions with the most votes. To vote for this suggestion, click the "I Agree" button in the message pane. If you do not see the button, follow this link to open the suggestion in the Microsoft Web-based Newsreader and then click "I Agree" in the message pane. http://windowshelp.microsoft.com/communities/newsgroups/en-us/default.mspx?mid=ee212587-9ab5-40a2-8e6d-b4a1664bcc12&dg=microsoft.public.windows.64bit.general Tag: Dodgy USB Stick Handling Tag: 54353
  - 23
    - MERRY CHRISTMAS! A Merry Christmas to you all! AndyB Tag: Dodgy USB Stick Handling Tag: 54349
  - 24
    - MCAAHNY, evvabody. . . :0) !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Tony. . . Tag: Dodgy USB Stick Handling Tag: 54347
  - 25
    - Hidden Vista64/32 Tricks, Tips, Tools ! These Hidden Tools Will help you get maximum performance, What are The Best of Vista 64/32, Tweak Security Settings in XP and Vista,How Using USB keys to improve Vista performance, Networking Vista and much more at... http://vista-tricks-tips.blogspot.com Tag: Dodgy USB Stick Handling Tag: 54344
- Next
  - 1
    - iv upgraded from xp home tp xp pro iv did a upgrade from xp home to xp pro and it went well but now it says i have no sound card can any one help with this problem . Tag: Dodgy USB Stick Handling Tag: 54342
  - 2
    - Shortcuts on the desktop and in the start menu are missing, Hey Everytime i install a program, game or just someting, it doesn't put a shortvut on the desktop or in the start menu, even if it normally does. The software can still be found in "Program Files", and in the controlpanel (hope that's what's called in english) I'm using Vista 64-bit, which i just installed yesterday. In the first few hours, software got installed and placed their shortcuts as thye should, but then the problem came. If i remember right the problem came after i've solved the problem with "BOOTMGR" because i have SATA2 and an IDE harddisk. /Denno Tag: Dodgy USB Stick Handling Tag: 54330
  - 3
    - hard drive failure apparently my hard drive is dead...when I went to turn my computer on, only the fans came on, although I can feel activity in the hard drive, nothing comes up on screen. Need help trouble shooting, or info on how to retrieve data using a friend's computer via a slave, etc...HELP! Tag: Dodgy USB Stick Handling Tag: 54320
  - 4
    - Programming on Vista Ultimate... Hello, I was wondering whether anyone has had any problems with using .NET or Eclipse on Vista Ultimate or any 64bit operating systems. I am thinking of getting a new laptop but it is preloaded with Vista Ultimate. Any info would be appreciated. Thanks! Tag: Dodgy USB Stick Handling Tag: 54316
  - 5
    - BSOD, mismanaging system PTEs, x64/WinServer2003? My power unit & graphics card went down. PCWorld(UK) fitted new graphics [GeForce 8400GS] and power unit. WEB access runs for ~5minutes & then BSOD, saying : "The driver is mismanaging system PTEs. disable BIOS memory options eg caching, shadowing STOP: 0x000000DA, etc" Google search yielded a MS Hotfix KB831899 but this failed : "different hardware platform" Other Googles suggest the NVIDIA driver is incorrect, hence the Hotfix. Yet another implies WindowsServer2003 is problem (this came with the ASUS board but is not used(?) since I use Win XP x64 SP2. System: ASUS A8N5X m/bd; Athlon x64 2.4GHz, twin 300GB h/ds, 2Gb RAM WEB acces via ethernet cable to router[Belkin Wireless G] cable modem[VirginMedia] @ 4Gb/s What next? Anyone got better ideas, please? roj, tearing hair from already bald top! DuH! --- avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean. Virus Database (VPS): 071222-0, 22/12/2007 Tested on: 23/12/2007 12:49:44 avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2007 ALWIL Software. http://www.avast.com Tag: Dodgy USB Stick Handling Tag: 54314
  - 6
    - Why does my computer not close down completely? I bought a new computer with Vista home premium installed. I have not installed much yet because I have been having problems 'restarting' and'shutting down'. In essence when i shut down or restart the computer it closes down to a certain point where the computer is still on but with no functionality i.e. no image being sent and no computer noise from the hardware working. At this point I have left it for over 30 minutes and in the end had to shut it down by pressing and holding the power button on the fron tof the computer. To restart I have to turn the power off at the back of the computer as if i don't all I get is the whirling sound of the fan at initial start-up continuously. Any idea??? -- msw Tag: Dodgy USB Stick Handling Tag: 54313
  - 7
    - Windows Media Player 10 Hi, I have Windows X64 Pro. I recently installed Windows Media Player 10 and it's not working right. It stops playing at any random time. I want to uninstall it and reinstall it but it's not in Add/Remove Programs and the folder doesn't have an Uninstaller. How can I uninstall Media Player 10 so that I can reinstall it? -- Denise ~ If you don't know where you came from, you won't know where you're going. Tag: Dodgy USB Stick Handling Tag: 54307
  - 8
    - Dual Boot Vista & Server ?? Can anyone tell me if its possible to install Vista 64 and then install Server 2008 and switch between them using Vista boot manager or something like it ? I'd like to try out the test version of server but also use the PC for normal usage in Vista. The PC is not a business PC, just for home use and trying out different OS's. I realise I could do it with VMWare or maybe Virtual PC but thats another learning curve I;d rather not go to. Thanks for any constructive comments Mike Tag: Dodgy USB Stick Handling Tag: 54301
  - 9
    - Trying to install "new" monitor .inf file in Vista 64 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_00EF_01C844C3.C525F610 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit name of file: sceptre_vista_certified.inf see attachment of inf I'm trying to install So far tried these methods in Vista 64 1. Right clicked on file choose "install" this did not work error message I received "a referral was returned from the server" was in a pop-up box with a red x C:\sceptre_vista_certified.inf 2. At an elevated command prompt changed to C:\ Previously I had copied the sceptre_vista_certified.inf to C: 3. pasted this to the elevated command prompt of c:\>rundll32 syssetup,SetupInfObjectInstallAction DefaultInstall 128 .\sceptre_vista_certified.inf No response received What am I doing wrong? Got this method from this link: http://www.windowsitpro.com/Articles/ArticleID/14750/14750.html?Ad=1 Can anyone help here? Thanks ------=_NextPart_000_00EF_01C844C3.C525F610 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="sceptre_vista_certified.inf" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="sceptre_vista_certified.inf" ;SCEPTRE MONITOR DEVICE INFORMATION FILE FOR WINDOWS 2000,=20 ;WINDOWS XP and Windows Vista ;SCEPTRE INC EDITED BY ROBERT LI ;REVISION DATE 07/24/07 ; =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D Version section = =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D [VERSION] SIGNATURE=3D"$Windows NT$" CLASS=3DMONITOR ClassGuid =3D {4d36e96e-e325-11ce-bfc1-08002be10318} PROVIDER=3D%MFG% DriverVer=3D03/08/2007,2.0.1 CatalogFile =3D monitor.cat [SourceDisksNames] 1=3D"Sceptre LCD Monitor Installation Disk",,0 [DestinationDirs] DefaultDestDir=3D11 ; =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D = Manufacturer/Models sections =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D [MANUFACTURER] %MFG%=3DSCEPTRE, NTamd64 [SCEPTRE.NTamd64] ;LCD MONITOR ;SCEPTRE %SPT2091%=3DSPT2091, MONITOR\SPT2091 ;X20WG-Naga %SPT2011%=3DSPT2011, MONITOR\SPT2011 ;X20WG-1080P %SPT2200%=3DSPT2200, MONITOR\SPT2200 ;X22WG-Gamer %SPT2301%=3DSPT2301, MONITOR\SPT2301 ;X23WG-1080P %SPT2201%=3DSPT2201, MONITOR\SPT2201 ;X22WG-1080P %SPT2401%=3DSPT2401, MONITOR\SPT2401 ;X24WG-Naga ;INSTALL SECTIONS ;X20WGNAGA [SPT2091] DelReg=3DDEL_CURRENT_REG AddReg=3DSPT2091.AddReg, 1680, DPMS AddReg=3DSPT2091.AddReg, 1280, DPMS [SPT2091.AddReg] HKR,"MODES\1680,1050",MODE1,,"30.5-66.0,55.0-60.0,+,+" HKR,"MODES\1280,1024",MODE1,,"30.5-83.0,55.0-76.5,+,+" HKR,,ICMProfile,1,7 =20 ;X20WG1080P [SPT2011] DelReg=3DDEL_CURRENT_REG AddReg=3DSPT2091.AddReg, 1680, DPMS AddReg=3DSPT2091.AddReg, 1280, DPMS [SPT2011.AddReg] HKR,"MODES\1680,1050",MODE1,,"30.5-66.0,55.0-60.0,+,+" HKR,"MODES\1280,1024",MODE1,,"30.5-83.0,55.0-76.5,+,+" HKR,,ICMProfile,1,7 =20 ;X22WGGAMER [SPT2200] DelReg=3DDEL_CURRENT_REG AddReg=3DSPT2200.AddReg, 1680, DPMS AddReg=3DSPT2200.AddReg, 1280, DPMS [SPT2200.AddReg] HKR,"MODES\1680,1050",MODE1,,"30.5-66.0,55.0-60.0,+,+" HKR,"MODES\1280,1024",MODE1,,"30.5-83.0,55.0-76.5,+,+" HKR,,ICMProfile,1,7 =20 ;X23WG1080P [SPT2301] DelReg=3DDEL_CURRENT_REG AddReg=3DSPT2301.AddReg, 1440, DPMS AddReg=3DSPT2301.AddReg, 1280, DPMS [SPT2301.AddReg] HKR,"MODES\1440,900",MODE1,,"30.5-73.0,55.0-75.0,+,+" HKR,"MODES\1280,1024",MODE1,,"30.5-83.0,55.0-76.5,+,+" HKR,,ICMProfile,1,7 =20 ;X22WG1080P [SPT2201] DelReg=3DDEL_CURRENT_REG AddReg=3DSPT2201.AddReg, 1680, DPMS AddReg=3DSPT2201.AddReg, 1280, DPMS [SPT2201.AddReg] HKR,"MODES\1680,1050",MODE1,,"30.5-66.0,55.0-60.0,+,+" HKR,"MODES\1280,1024",MODE1,,"30.5-83.0,55.0-76.5,+,+" HKR,,ICMProfile,1,7 =20 =0A= ;X24WG-Naga [SPT2401] DelReg=3DDEL_CURRENT_REG AddReg=3DSPT2401.AddReg, 1920, DPMS AddReg=3DSPT2401.AddReg, 1280, DPMS [SPT2401.AddReg] HKR,"MODES\1920,1200",MODE1,,"30.5-76.0,55.0-60.0,+,-" HKR,"MODES\1280,1024",MODE1,,"30.5-83.0,55.0-76.5,+,+" ;COMMON ADD/DEL REG SECTION [DEL_CURRENT_REG] HKR,MODES HKR,,MAXRESOLUTION HKR,,DPMS HKR,,ICMProfile ; Pre-defined AddReg sections [1680] HKR,,MaxResolution,,"1680,1050" [1440] HKR,,MaxResolution,,"1440,900" [1280] HKR,,MaxResolution,,"1280,1024" [1920] HKR,,MaxResolution,,"1920,1200" [DPMS] HKR,,DPMS,,1 ;STRINGS SECTION [Strings] MonitorClassName=3D"Monitor" MFG=3D"SCEPTRE, INC." SPT2091=3D"SCEPTRE X20WG-Naga" SPT2011=3D"SCEPTRE X20WG-1080P" SPT2200=3D"SCEPTRE X22WG-Gamer" SPT2301=3D"SCEPTRE X23WG-1080P" SPT2201=3D"SCEPTRE X22WG-1080P" SPT2401=3D"SCEPTRE X24WG-Naga" ;END OF FILE ------=_NextPart_000_00EF_01C844C3.C525F610-- Tag: Dodgy USB Stick Handling Tag: 54299
  - 10
    - New install XP Pro 64: video glitch on first boot Hello! I decided to create a dual boot 32/64 installation on a secondary computer in my home. Everything for the installation went as intended. However, upon initial boot from the hard drive into Windows, the welcome screen is chopped and distorted in horizontal segments of about half an inch apart. I can see the mouse pointer move around, but the pointer is split into about 15 pieces scattered across the screen. My hardware is an Athlon 64 4000+, 7800GTX and a Dell 2405 FPW LCD monitor. This hardware functions (and has been for over a year) flawlessly, so it is not a faulty hardware issue. I have trie plugging the DVI cable for the monitor into both DVI ports on the back of the 7800GTX but the result is identical. If this is a driver issue, how do I get the appropriate driver installed on the computer if I cannot see what is going on on the screen? Thanks very much in advance for any help anyone can give. Happy Holidays! Ryan Tag: Dodgy USB Stick Handling Tag: 54289
  - 11
    - Problems with USB device drivers This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_000B_01C8449D.742C6580 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable After installation of Windows XP 64bit, I noticed that I cannot read any = USB device. All drivers for the mobo were updated and so is the BIOS. I = get the following error message: Windows cannot load the device driver for this hardware. The driver may = be corrupted or missing. (Code 39) Click Troubleshoot to start the troubleshooter for this device. Even after trouble shooting I have no luck. Anybody? Thx. ------=_NextPart_000_000B_01C8449D.742C6580 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; = charset=3Diso-8859-1"> <META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.6000.16587" name=3DGENERATOR> <STYLE></STYLE> </HEAD> <BODY> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>After installation of Windows XP 64bit, = I noticed=20 that I cannot read <STRONG><U>any</U></STRONG> USB device. All drivers = for the=20 mobo were updated and so is the BIOS. I get the following error=20 message:</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><STRONG>Windows cannot load the device = driver for=20 this hardware. The driver may be corrupted or missing. (Code=20 39)</STRONG></FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><STRONG></STRONG></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><STRONG>Click Troubleshoot to start the = troubleshooter for this device.</STRONG></FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Even after trouble shooting I have no = luck.=20 Anybody? Thx.</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML> ------=_NextPart_000_000B_01C8449D.742C6580-- Tag: Dodgy USB Stick Handling Tag: 54288
  - 12
    - Attention Carlos As of today this is what I'm getting when sending you e-mail. "This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification. Delivery to the following recipients failed. ___________________________________________" <<< your e-mail addy here. Is your mail-box working...........or maybe full? Thanks Tag: Dodgy USB Stick Handling Tag: 54287
  - 13
    - Telephony Will Not Start I am unable to Dial-up the Interent because the Telephony Service will not start. I have: Entered Run services.msc, right-clicked on Telephony, and left-clicked Properties; with Start-up type set to Manual I clicked the Start button. Instead of starting error message 1053 appeared. The message said, the service did not respond to the service request in timely fashion. I checked to see if the services Telephony depends were running and both Plug-N-Play and RPC had started. I entered the path to the executable program and found svchost.exe in C:\WINDOWS\System32, but the path also had a suffix -k tapisrv, so I performed a search for tapisrv and found tapisrv.dll in C:WINDOWS/System32. I searched the Registry for svchost, tapisrv and found it in HKEY_USERS, under AppEvents, Software, Microsoft, Search Assistant, ACMru, 5603, 002. I ran net stop tas, rebooted and performed the net start tas command. Telephony did not start; local was checked and PnP and RPC both started. I ran sfc/scannow, put my system disk in the CD drive and watched it verified the hidden files. Then I rebooted. Telephony still did not start. When I clicked on the Telephony Start button, I got error message 1053. Event Viewer â?? System displays the following error messages: 7000 Telephony service failed to respond to start request 7001 Remote Access Control Mgr failed to start because t depends on Telephony 7009 Timeout waiting for Telephony 7024 Routing and Remote Access terminated 1060 Application Popup The description for 1060: \SystemRoot\Sys\Wow64\Drivers\mdc8021x.sys has been blocked from loading due to icompatability with nthis system; and in the detail it said file name ws03res.dll Event Viewer - Applications has a Warning Category Ci Service. The IISADMIN service is not available, so virtual roots cannot be indexed Could this be the cause of the Telephony Service not starting? Can someone help me? -- NC Tag: Dodgy USB Stick Handling Tag: 54274
  - 14
    - Telephony will not start -- NC Tag: Dodgy USB Stick Handling Tag: 54271
  - 15
    - INF file for my monitor I downloaded a inf file for my monitor.How do I install it in Vista 64? It's for vista. Tag: Dodgy USB Stick Handling Tag: 54252
  - 16
    - NVidia ForceWare 169.25's whql for Vista x64 NVidia has released a new whql set of drivers for Vista x64. http://www.nvidia.com/object/winvista_x64_169.25_whql.html Carlos Tag: Dodgy USB Stick Handling Tag: 54245
  - 17
    - ATI 7.12's for Vista x64 are out ATI (http://game.amd.com/us-en/drivers_catalyst.aspx?p=vista64/common-vista64) has released a new set of drivers for their video cards. Carlos Tag: Dodgy USB Stick Handling Tag: 54243
  - 18
    - If you are using an nVidia chipset and cannot use 4GB in Vista... If you are getting a bluescreen when attempting to boot into Vista and you have just tried to increase the ram to 4GB or more and if your mobo has an nVidia chipset then this kb article may be for you. It has download links for patching both 32-bit and 64-bit Vista. Please review the Symtoms listed in the kb before downloading. http://support.microsoft.com/kb/930261/en-us Tag: Dodgy USB Stick Handling Tag: 54239
  - 19
    - No 1152 x 864 resolution option I'm running Vista Ultimate x64 with an eVGA nVidia 8800 GT 512 MB (superclocked). My graphics driver is forceware 169.02. I have a 19" Samsung SyncMaster 997df CRT that I'm currently using. However, I am not given the option to change my resolution to 1152 x 864. It goes from 1024 x 768 to 1280 x 720 onwards and completely skips the resolution I want. I prefer the 1152 x 864 as it's sharper than the 1024 x 768 but yet the text isn't so small I have to strain my eyes to read it (as with 1280 x 1024). Does anyone know if this is a Vista x64 problem or a problem with the nVidia drivers? I've checked eVGA's and nVidia's websites and they both claim that my 8800 GT and 169.02 driver can display many more resolutions than are available to me. Tag: Dodgy USB Stick Handling Tag: 54238
  - 20
    - Memory Diagnostic tool in Vista 64 Is this memory Diagnostic tool any good? How many passes should I set it for? Thanks Tag: Dodgy USB Stick Handling Tag: 54224
  - 21
    - Registering DLL Hi I'm trying to register a DLL, but somehow I can't manage to do that, I end up with a error message "Unable to find module" or something. I'm trying to achive this by using regsvr32.exe from the syswow folder, but it cannot be done. Has someone encourted this before? If so, please help, I need to configure a production server, and I'm running out of time. Thx -- Boro Causev MCSE, MCSA, MCDBA, MCAD CompTIA A+, Network+, Security+ Tag: Dodgy USB Stick Handling Tag: 54223
  - 22
    - Motorola phones USB driver v3.3.0 for x64 Motorola released a new set of drivers for their mobile phones for 64-bit versions of XP and Vista. http://developer.motorola.com/docstools/USB_Drivers/ I am successfully using the prior version (v3.2.0) with my Motorola W510 phone and Windows Vista x64. These drivers are not necessary for the usual USB Mass Storage function, but they allow you to use your phone with Motorola Mobile Phone Tools, P2K Tools, Mobiledit, etc. Carlos Tag: Dodgy USB Stick Handling Tag: 54222
  - 23
    - NVidia 169.21's whql for XP x64 released Nvidia has released a new set of whql drivers for its graphics cards in Windows XP x64. http://www.nvidia.com/object/winxp64_169.21_whql.html Carlos Tag: Dodgy USB Stick Handling Tag: 54221
  - 24
    - RAM problems To increase performance in pc i decided to upgrade from 2GB to 4GB but after start the computer and logging in i was having some performance issues which i had not had before and my proccessor (Q6600) was at 35% constantly. i updated my subscore and found that i had gone from 4.4 with 2GB to 1.6 with 4GB also games that i could play before now have appaling frame rates. I am using 64-bit visita the RAM is matching 4x1GB 800mhz oh, and i have installed the visit 64-bit patch that is supposed to deal with it Tag: Dodgy USB Stick Handling Tag: 54207
  - 25
    - RC for XP SP3 (32-bit) http://www.informationweek.com/news/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=205100675&cid=nl_IWK_daily Where does XP X64 fit into the scheme of things regarding SP3? I realize the RC mentioned in the article is not for X64. But does that mean there'll be one coming soon for us leading-edgers? Or does X64 not need the fixes that SP3 contains? Tag: Dodgy USB Stick Handling Tag: 54205

(XP X64, all patches)

I have a number of USB sticks that work fine and a few that work fine
on X32 but not on X64.

Device manager assigns a drive letter and I can operate on the USB
using line mode in a command window
(Isn't DOS wonderful!).

In the GUI world the drive does not show in My Computer or anywhere
else, except device manager as a disk, as it should.

Event Viewer has an error 111 which MS Help indicates is a a problem
with the device, not XP, but 32 bit versions of XP are happy with the
device. Any idea where I might look for the disconnect between device
management and the GUI? The problem sticks are by multiple USB
vendors.

Thanks :-)

CF

Top